DOCSLIB.ORG

Communication for Sustained Livelihoods and Food Security

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Communication for Sustained Livelihoods and Food Security Communication for Sustained Livelihoods and Food Security ASSESSMENT REPORT FUNDED BY DISCLAIMER This study is commissioned by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), as part of the “Communication for Sustained Livelihood and Food Security” project, implemented in cooperation with the Myanmar Ministry of Information, and funded by the Livelihoods and Food Security Trust Fund (LIFT) (www.lift‐fund.org). The report was prepared by DantDaLun Management and Consulting Services Company Ltd., with participation from regional and national local partners and stakeholders including, State and local government entities, NGOs, rural communities, community‐based associations, institutions and project beneficiaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. UNESCO does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of its use thereof. Authorization from UNESCO is required before citing, referencing or/and reproducing this report, in part or whole. For further information, please contact the below: UNESCO Myanmar UN Building No.6 Natmauk Road, Tamwe Township Yangon ‐ The Republic of the Union of Myanmar Tel: + 95 1 542910‐19; Ext: 130,109 Fax: +951 544531 E‐mail: [email protected] © UNESCO 2015 All rights reserved 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS DantDaLun Management and Consulting Services Company Ltd. would like to thank all those who have contributed to making this study possible. In particular, we would like to express our appreciation for the support and guidance of UNESCO and LIFT during the study. Special appreciation is also extended to the Myanmar Ministry of Information for their active collaboration, and facilitation of field data‐collection and research study through letters of introduction and coordination with the local stakeholders. The support of the respective State and local governments is also highly appreciated for smooth implementation of the assessment. The study team would like to express its appreciation to the LIFT partners who gave the time and effort of their staff to provide ground support during the data collection process, despite their own busy schedules and priorities. The survey would not have been possible without their assistance. DantDaLun appreciates the hard work of the study team – Lead Consultant, Steven Lanjouw; Agricultural Expert, Paul Roelofson; Team Leaders, Khin Hnin Yu, Mai Mang Sui Nawn and Kyaw Thura; Data Supervisors, Ohnmar Htun, Thae Phyu Htun and Khaing Kyaw Nyo; Analysis and Reporting Consultant, Choo Phuah; Statistician, U Zaw Win; as well as the enumerators and data processing team. October 2015 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Table of contents ................................................................................................................................................ 3 List of Acronyms .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 7 I. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 11 II. Study objectives and design ...................................................................................................................... 11 A. Study objectives ................................................................................................................................... 11 B. Study areas........................................................................................................................................... 11 C. Study questions .................................................................................................................................... 15 D. Study framework .................................................................................................................................. 15 E. Study methods ..................................................................................................................................... 17 III. Study findings ........................................................................................................................................... 19 A. General information ............................................................................................................................. 19 B. Agricultural and livelihood situation ..................................................................................................... 22 C. Overview of information needs and communication channels ............................................................. 25 D. Agriculture and livelihood information needs ...................................................................................... 32 E. Use of different means of communication ........................................................................................... 42 F. Mapping of current information channels ............................................................................................ 47 G. Summary of key findings by states and regions .................................................................................... 60 IV. Key information gaps and preferred channels of communication ............................................................. 64 A. Key information gaps ........................................................................................................................... 64 B. Analysis of preferred communication channels .................................................................................... 64 V. Recommendations .................................................................................................................................... 68 VI. Bibliography .............................................................................................................................................. 70 VII. Annexes .................................................................................................................................................... 72 Annex 1: Data collection tools ....................................................................................................................... 73 Annex 2: List of organisations interviewed .................................................................................................... 95 Annex 3: Description of agriculture and livelihood information categories ................................................... 98 Annex 4: Data on access to communications from 2014 census .................................................................... 99 3 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: List of study townships and villages ..................................................................................................... 13 Table 2: Profile of survey townships .................................................................................................................. 14 Table 3: Information categories and types of information ................................................................................ 16 Table 4: Overall socio‐economic conditions in the study states/regions ........................................................... 20 Table 5: Percentage of respondents who indicate they need information related to different categories ........ 25 Table 6: Most important types of information needed ..................................................................................... 26 Table 7: Use of different communication channels to access livelihood information ........................................ 32 Table 8: Mapping of available information sources on livelihoods and food security ........................................ 49 Table 9: Access to communication channels by state/region ............................................................................ 57 Table 10: Most important types of information needed and current available sources of information (shaded rows are areas where the information gap is high) ........................................................................................... 65 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Map of study areas ............................................................................................................................. 12 Figure 2: Occupation of respondents ................................................................................................................ 21 Figure 3: Age distribution of respondents ......................................................................................................... 21 Figure 4: Ethnic composition of respondents .................................................................................................... 22 Figure 5: Household income sources ................................................................................................................. 23 Figure 6: Land area cultivated by households ................................................................................................... 24 Figure 7: Source of information
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Learning with the Irrawaddy, No. 42 to Accompany the January 2010 Issue of the Irrawaddy Magazine
    Learning with The Irrawaddy, No. 42 To accompany the January 2010 issue of The Irrawaddy magazine. Selected article: Taking Over the Airwaves A. Activities before reading Activity 1 Discussion: Who is listening? What is the man in the picture holding? What does the word ‘airwaves’ in the title mean? What do you think this article is about? Do you or your family listen to the radio? If yes, what programmes do you like to listen to? If no, what programmes do you think you would like to listen to? Activity 2 Technical Vocabulary The words in column A are key words in this article. In the context of radio, they have a more technical meaning than when used in other contexts. Match them to the correct definition in column B. Use a dictionary if you need to. A B 1. airwaves (n) a. permit or permission 2. broadcast (v/n) b. wave-band for specific radio station 3. frequency (n) c. channel for carrying broadcast sound (n) 4. high-fidelity (adj) d. send out (information) electronically (v) 5. license (n/v) e. send out (information) widely 6. medium / media(n) f. distance between the centre and the edge of a circle 7. radius (n) g. accurate sound quality 8. transmit (v) h. The means or method by which something is communicated Activity 3 Grammar Review: practice with question-forms Radio and other media, broadcast things they think will interest people. In this exercise, write down the question you would ask someone, to find out this information. Remember to use ‘you’ in the question, not ‘they’.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewership and Listenership Survey
    VIEWERSHIP & Listenership Survey Lashio & North Okkalapa Research conducted by Ah Yo, Su Mon, Soe Win Myint with the FEBRUARY 2017 assistance of LRC in Lashio, Saitta Thukha Development Institute in REPORT WRITTEN BY: North Okkalapa, and Xavey Research Solutions. Anna Zongollowicz, PhD FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Isla Glaister Country, Director of Search for Common Ground - Myanmar Email: [email protected] VIEWERSHIP & LISTENERSHIP SURVEY Lashio & North Okkalapa 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary 4 TV 5 Radio 6 Social Media 6 Reaction to News 6 Conclusion 7 Recommendations 7 Listenership & Viewership Survey 8 Introduction 8 Youth 9 Media 9 Methodology 11 Sampling 12 Limitations 12 Findings 13 Demographics 13 TV Viewership 14 Radio Listenership 16 Social Media 17 Reaction to News 18 Conclusion 19 Recommendations 20 References 21 SEARCH FOR COMMON GROUND VIEWERSHIP & LISTENERSHIP SURVEY Lashio & North Okkalapa 3 CONTENTS Executive Summary 4 TV 5 Radio 6 Social Media 6 Reaction to News 6 Conclusion 7 Recommendations 7 Listenership & Viewership Survey 8 Introduction 8 Youth 9 Media 9 Methodology 11 Sampling 12 Limitations 12 Findings 13 Demographics 13 TV Viewership 14 Radio Listenership 16 Social Media 17 © Search for Common Ground - Myanmar (2017) Disclaimer Reaction to News 18 The research has been carried out with the financial assistance of the Peace Support Fund. Conclusion 19 The opinions expressed in the report are those of the authors and in no circumstances Recommendations 20 refer to the official views of Search for Common Ground or the Peace Support Fund. References 21 SEARCH FOR COMMON GROUND VIEWERSHIP & LISTENERSHIP SURVEY Lashio & North Okkalapa 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The report contains findings from a quantitative survey examining TV viewership, radio listenership and social media usage, which was conducted in the third week of November 2016 in Lashio (Shan State) and North Okkalapa (Greater Yangon).
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar Business Guide for Brazilian Businesses
    2019 Myanmar Business Guide for Brazilian Businesses An Introduction of Business Opportunities and Challenges in Myanmar Prepared by Myanmar Research | Consulting | Capital Markets Contents Introduction 8 Basic Information 9 1. General Characteristics 10 1.1. Geography 10 1.2. Population, Urban Centers and Indicators 17 1.3. Key Socioeconomic Indicators 21 1.4. Historical, Political and Administrative Organization 23 1.5. Participation in International Organizations and Agreements 37 2. Economy, Currency and Finances 38 2.1. Economy 38 2.1.1. Overview 38 2.1.2. Key Economic Developments and Highlights 39 2.1.3. Key Economic Indicators 44 2.1.4. Exchange Rate 45 2.1.5. Key Legislation Developments and Reforms 49 2.2. Key Economic Sectors 51 2.2.1. Manufacturing 51 2.2.2. Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry 54 2.2.3. Construction and Infrastructure 59 2.2.4. Energy and Mining 65 2.2.5. Tourism 73 2.2.6. Services 76 2.2.7. Telecom 77 2.2.8. Consumer Goods 77 2.3. Currency and Finances 79 2.3.1. Exchange Rate Regime 79 2.3.2. Balance of Payments and International Reserves 80 2.3.3. Banking System 81 2.3.4. Major Reforms of the Financial and Banking System 82 Page | 2 3. Overview of Myanmar’s Foreign Trade 84 3.1. Recent Developments and General Considerations 84 3.2. Trade with Major Countries 85 3.3. Annual Comparison of Myanmar Import of Principal Commodities 86 3.4. Myanmar’s Trade Balance 88 3.5. Origin and Destination of Trade 89 3.6.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study from Myanmar How to Inform, Empower, and Impact Communities
    INFORMATION ECOSYSTEMS in transition: A case stUDY from myanmar HOW to inform, emPOWer, anD imPact commUnities Mon State, Myanmar Pilot Study PART ONE: RESEARCH FINDINGS ABOUT THE AUTHORS ABOUT THE RESEARCH TEAM EXecUtiVE SUmmary Andrew Wasuwongse is a graduate of the Johns Hopkins Established in 1995, Myanmar Survey Research (MSR) University’s School of Advanced International Studies in is a market and social research company based in Washington, DC. He holds a master’s degree in International Yangon, Myanmar. MSR has produced over 650 Relations and International Economics, with a concentration research reports in the fields of social, market, and in Southeast Asia Studies. While a research assistant for environmental research over the past 16 years for UN the SAIS Burma Study Group, he supported visits by three agencies, INGOs, and business organizations. Burmese government delegations to Washington, DC, including officials from Myanmar’s Union Parliament, ABOUT INTERNEWS in MYANMAR Ministry of Health, and Ministry of Industry. He has worked as a consultant for World Vision Myanmar, where he led an Internews is an international nonprofit organization whose assessment of education programs in six regions across mission is to empower local media worldwide to give people Myanmar, and has served as an English teacher in Kachin the news and information they need, the ability to connect State, Myanmar, and in Thailand on the Thai-Myanmar border. and the means to make their voices heard. Internews He speaks Thai and Burmese. provides communities with the resources to produce local news and information with integrity and independence. Alison Campbell is currently Internews’ Senior Director With global expertise and reach, Internews trains both media for Global Initiatives based in Washington, DC, overseeing professionals and citizen journalists, introduces innovative Internews’ environmental, health and humanitarian media solutions, increases coverage of vital issues and helps programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban–Rural Differences in the Prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus Among 25–74 Year-Old Adults of the Yangon Region, Myanmar: Two Cross- Sectional Studies
    Open Access Research BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020406 on 30 March 2018. Downloaded from Urban–rural differences in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus among 25–74 year-old adults of the Yangon Region, Myanmar: two cross- sectional studies Wai Phyo Aung,1,2 Aung Soe Htet,1,3 Espen Bjertness,1 Hein Stigum,1 Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong,4 Marte Karoline Råberg Kjøllesdal1 To cite: Aung WP, Htet AS, ABSTRACT Strengths and limitations of this study Bjertness E, et al. Urban–rural Objectives To investigate the association between urban– differences in the prevalence of rural location and the occurrence of diabetes mellitus (DM) ► The study followed the internationally recommend- diabetes mellitus among 25–74 in the Yangon Region, and to estimate the proportion of year-old adults of the Yangon ed WHO STEP protocol. urban and rural participants already diagnosed with DM, Region, Myanmar: two cross- ► A national reference laboratory was used for the in- and of those, the proportion under treatment and under sectional studies. BMJ Open vestigation of fasting plasma glucose. control. 2018;8:e020406. doi:10.1136/ ► Both urban and rural areas were included. bmjopen-2017-020406 Design Two cross-sectional studies, using the WHO STEPs ► Because the results were from only one region of methodology. Myanmar, the results might not be generalised to the ► Prepublication history for Setting The Yangon Region of Myanmar, urban and rural this paper is available online. entire Myanmar population. areas. To view these files, please visit the journal online (http:// dx. doi. Participants Men and women, aged 25–74 years, included during the study period from September– org/ 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Occupation and Industry Report
    THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census The Union Report: Occupation and Industry Census Report Volume 2-B Department of Population Ministry of Immigration and Population MYANMAR March 2016 The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census The Union Report: Occupation and Industry Census Report Volume 2-B For more information contact: Department of Population Ministry of Immigration and Population Office No. 48 Nay Pyi Taw MYANMAR Tel: +95 67 431 062 www.dop.gov.mm March, 2016 Foreword The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census was conducted in March 2014 by the Ministry of Immigration and Population (MOIP). It was supported by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and development partners, namely Australia, Finland, Germany, Italy, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. This is the first census in over three decades; the last censuses being in 1983 and 1973. This census was undertaken within the provisions of the Population and Housing Census Law enacted in July 2013. Its results are vital to the planning and development of Myanmar. The results will inform on-going reforms, policy making and planning for development at all levels. The results of the 2014 Census have been published so far in three volumes. The first was the Preliminary Results (Census Volume 1), which was released in August 2014. The Census Main Results were launched in May 2015 by H.E. U Thein Sein, the President of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar. These included The Union Report (Census Report Volume 2), Highlights of the Main Results (Census Report Volume 2-A), and the reports of each of the 15 States and Regions (Census Report Volume 3-[A to O]).
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights Situation Overview
    Myanmar: Sagaing/Mandalay earthquake Situation Report No. 3 This report is produced by OCHA on behalf of the Humanitarian Coordinator. It covers the period from 13 to 16 November 2012. Highlights • The Government indicates at least 16 people were killed and 52 other injured in the earthquake, registering 6.8 on the Richter scale that struck Sagaing and Mandalay Regions on 11 November. Unofficial reports suggest the number of casualties and injured may be higher. • The Government reports that over 400 houses, 65 schools and 100 religious buildings were damaged. • Out of 22 Townships affected across Sagaing and Mandalay Regions, initial information indicates that Singu and Thabeikkyin Townships in Mandalay and Kyaukmyaung sub-township in Sagaing were most affected. • The Government at Union and Region level has been the first responder. The UN Humanitarian Co-ordinator has been in regular contact with the Government to offer assistance of the international humanitarian community should this be needed. • An inter-agency rapid assessment team, comprising CARE, Save the Children, UNICEF and the Myanmar Nurses and Midwife Association, has been undertaking assessments across four townships, including Singu, Shwebo, Kyauk Myaung and Thabeikkyin, since 13 November. Myanmar Red Cross Society (MRCS) deployed three emergency response teams for assessments in the affected villages in Singu Township. • Needs identified preliminarily include temporary schools, and temporary shelters and non-food items for the families whose houses were destroyed in the earthquake. 16 52 400 65 22 deaths injuries houses schools townships destroyed damaged affected Situation Overview At least 16 people were killed and 52 injured, according to the Government as of 16 November, in the earthquake of 6.8 on the Richter scale in Sagaing and Mandalay Regions on 11 November, also causing damages to public buildings, residential houses and infrastructures.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule of Law and Access to Justice Reform in Myanmar
    RULE OF LAW AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE REFORM IN MYANMAR RESEARCH PROJECT SUMMARIES 2019-2020 Supported by the Denmark-Myanmar Programme on Rule of Law and Human Rights This book is the result of human rights thematic group research project on “Rule of Law and Access to Justice Reform in Myanmar”. It aimed to produce quality papers which discussed about the approach taken by the Government, especially the Office of the Supreme Court and Attorney General’s Office Strategy to increase respect for rule of law and fundamental human rights in Myanmar. The Rule of Law and Access to Justice Reform in Myanmar Research Project Summaries, 2020 (Yangon, Myanmar). Published by the Denmark-Myanmar Progrmme on Rule of Law and Human Rights Copy-Editor – Dr Simon Robins Cover Design © Za Mal Din Printing House – 5 PIXELS Company Limited, Building No. (17), Pathein Kyaung Street, Near of National Races Village, Tharketa Township, Yangon. Disclaimer This publication was arranged and funded by the Denmark-Myanmar Programme on Rule of Law and Human Rights. The opinions expressed in it are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Embassy of Denmark in Myanmar. Researchers Dr Thi Thi Lwin, Daw May Thu Zaw, Dr Mya Myo Khaing, Dr Yu Mon Cho, Dr Yin Yin Myint, Daw Moe Thu, Daw Khin Soe Soe Aye, Dr May Thu Zar Aung, Dr Ei Thandar Swe, Dr Thin Thin Khaing, Dr Pa Pa Soe Senior Research Advisers Dr Mike Hayes Dr Bencharat Sae Chua Dr Suphamet Yunyasit Dr Duanghathai Buranajaroenkij Review Committee Members Dr Khin Chit Chit Dr Khin Khin Oo Dr Martin
    [Show full text]
  • Migrants from Myanmar and Risks Faced Abroad
    MIGRANTS FROM MYANMAR AND RISKS FACED ABROAD A desk study YEARS International Organization for Migration The views, opinions, findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of IOM or its Member States. The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the work do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IOM concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning its frontiers or boundaries. IOM is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society. As an intergovernmental organization, IOM acts with its partners in the international community to: assist in meeting the operational challenges of migration; advance understanding of migration issues; encourage social and economic development through migration; and uphold the human dignity and well-being of migrants. This study is part of the Migrants In Countries In Crisis (MICIC) Initiative. This publication has been made possible by the support of the American people through the US Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration (PRM). The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any agency of the Government of the United States of America. AUTHOR David Ndegwa COORDINATORS Lorenzo Guadagno Yin Mar Saw Sharon Dimanche GRAPHIC DESIGN Pierluigi Rauco PHOTO CREDITS IOM/Piers Benatar IOM Editorial: International Organization for Migration 17 Route des Morillons 1211 Geneva 19 Switzerland Tel.: +41 22 717 91 11 Fax: +41 22 798 61 50 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.iom.int © 2016 International Organization for Migration (IOM) All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report Myanmar
    Country Report Myanmar Natural Disaster Risk Assessment and Area Business Continuity Plan Formulation for Industrial Agglomerated Areas in the ASEAN Region March 2015 AHA CENTRE Japan International Cooperation Agency OYO International Corporation Mitsubishi Research Institute, Inc. CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. Overview of the Country Basic Information of Myanmar 1), 2), 3) National Flag Country Name Long form: Republic of the Union of Myanmar Short form: Myanmar Capital Naypidaw Area (km2) Total : 676,590 Land: 653,290 Inland Water: 23,300 Population 53,259,018 Population density 82 (people/km2 of land area) Population growth 0.9 (annual %) Urban population 33 (% of total) Languages Myanmar Ethnic Groups Burmese (about 70%),many other ethnic groups Religions Buddhism (90%), Christianity, Islam, others GDP (current US$) (billion) 55(Estimate) GNI per capita, PPP - (current international $) GDP growth (annual %) 6.4(Estimate) Agriculture, value added 48 (% of GDP) Industry, value added 16 (% of GDP) Services, etc., value added 35 (% of GDP) Brief Description Myanmar covers the western part of Indochina Peninsula, and the land area is about 1.8 times the size of Japan. Myanmar has a long territory stretching north to south, with the Irrawaddy River running through the heart of the country. While Burmese is the largest ethnic group in the country, the country has many ethnic minorities. Myanmar joined ASEAN on July 23, 1997, together with Laos. Due to the isolationist policy adopted by the military government led by Ne Win which continued until 1988, the economic development of Myanmar fell far behind other ASEAN countries. Today, Myanmar is a republic, and President Thein Sein is the head of state.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Right to a Nationality in Myanmar
    Foreword Many women in Myanmar do not have full access to the rights guaranteed by the applicable domestic and international legal framework. This is partly due to a large portion of the population bearing the burden of an insecure legal identity. According to Census data, almost a third of the population of Myanmar do not have a form of identity document, 54% of those who do not have identity cards are women. In this sense, a common goal of the Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC), the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), and UN Women is to improve the protection of women in Myanmar through the recognition of legal identity rights, including access to civil documents and citizenship, and thus improving access to the services that are dependent on a secure legal identity. Hence, the NRC in Myanmar, UNHCR and UN Women seek to remove legal and practical obstacles concerning access to documents and citizenship, paying attention to the gender dimension of such obstacles. In this context, this report ¬aims to expand existing knowledge on the gender dimension and the impact that the the current legislation and the factual lack of documentation to confirm citizenship has for women. Efforts to improve gender equality in citizenship issues are ongoing. The UNHCR has an important presence in Myanmar and plays an essential role in coordinating protection actors. UN Women is promoting gender equality through advocacy, research and other activities. Since June 2012, NRC has been supporting the Myanmar Ministry of Immigration, Labour & Populations (MoLIP) to speed up the issuance of national identity cards to conflict-affected communities in the South East.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Anti-Muslim Violence in Burma: a Call for Accountability and Prevention
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research City College of New York 2013 Patterns of Anti-Muslim Violence in Burma: A Call for Accountability and Prevention Andrea Gittleman Physicians for Human Rights Marissa Brodney Physicians for Human Rights Holly G. Atkinson CUNY City College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cc_pubs/408 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Physicians for Patterns of Anti-Muslim Human Rights Violence in Burma: A Call for Accountability August 2013 and Prevention A mother looks out from her tent alongside physiciansforhumanrights.org her children at a camp for internally displaced persons on the outskirts of Sittwe, Burma. Photo: Paula Bronstein/Getty Images About Physicians for Human Rights For more than 25 years, PHR’s use of science and medicine has been on the cutting edge of human rights work. 1986 2003 Led investigations of torture in Warned U.S. policymakers on health Chile, gaining freedom for heroic and human rights conditions prior doctors there to and during the invasion of Iraq 1988 2004 First to document the Iraqi use Documented genocide and sexual of chemical weapons on Kurds, violence in Darfur in support of providing evidence for prosecution international prosecutions of war criminals 2010 1996 Investigated the epidemic of Exhumed mass graves
    [Show full text]