DOCSLIB.ORG

Peneplain Formation in Southern Tibet Predates the India-Asia Collision and Plateau Uplift

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Peneplain Formation in Southern Tibet Predates the India-Asia Collision and Plateau Uplift Downloaded from geology.gsapubs.org on September 13, 2011 Peneplain formation in southern Tibet predates the India-Asia collision and plateau uplift Ralf Hetzel1, István Dunkl2, Vicky Haider2, Marcus Strobl1, Hilmar von Eynatten2, Lin Ding3, and Dirk Frei4 1Institut für Geologie und Paläontologie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Corrensstraße 24, 48149 Münster, Germany 2Geowissenschaftliches Zentrum der Universität Göttingen, Abteilung Sedimentologie/ Umweltgeologie, Goldschmidtstraße 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany 3Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research and Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China 4Department of Earth Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, 7602 Matieland, South Africa ABSTRACT STUDY AREA The uplift history of Tibet is crucial for understanding the geodynamic and paleoclima- The investigated bedrock peneplain is located tologic evolution of Asia; however, it remains controversial whether Tibet attained its high in the northern Lhasa block (Fig. 1A, inset) and elevation before or after India collided with Asia ~50 m.y. ago. Here we use thermochronologic was carved into Cretaceous granitoids and very and cosmogenic nuclide data from a large bedrock peneplain in southern Tibet to shed light on low grade metamorphic sediments of Jurassic the timing of the uplift. The studied peneplain, which was carved into Cretaceous granitoids age. Field investigations and the analysis of and Jurassic metasediments, is located in the northern Lhasa block at an altitude of ~5300 m. digital elevation models show that originally Thermal modeling based on (U-Th)/He ages of apatite and zircon, and apatite fi ssion track the peneplain extended for at least ~150 km data, indicate cooling and exhumation of the granitoids between ca. 70 and ca. 55 Ma, followed east-west and ~75 km north-south. Streams that by a rapid decline in exhumation rate from ~300 m/m.y. to ~10 m/m.y. between ca. 55 and incised the original erosion surface have gen- ca. 48 Ma. Since then, the peneplain has been a rather stable geomorphic feature, as indicated erated a local relief of as much as a few hun- by low local and catchment-wide erosion rates of 6–11 m/m.y. and 11–16 m/m.y., respectively, dred meters and divide the peneplain into dif- which were derived from cosmogenic 10Be concentrations in bedrock, grus, and stream sedi- ferent well-preserved parts that are at similar ment. The prolonged phase of erosion and planation that ended ca. 50 Ma removed 3–6 km of elevations of ~5200 m to ~5400 m (Strobl et al., rock from the peneplain region, likely accomplished by laterally migrating rivers. The lack of 2010). The best preserved portion of the original equivalent sediments in the northern Lhasa block and the presence of a regional unconformity planation surface occurs near the town of Ban- in the southern Lhasa block indicate that the rivers delivered this material to the ocean. This goin, where it was eroded into granitoids that implies that erosion and peneplanation proceeded at low elevation until India’s collision with intruded Early Cretaceous sediments (Fig. 1; Asia induced crustal thickening, surface uplift, and long-term preservation of the peneplain. see the GSA Data Repository1 for a descrip- tion of geomorphology and fi eld photographs). INTRODUCTION siderable north-south shortening in the Lhasa Locally, the granitoids underneath the peneplain The growth of the Tibetan Plateau, the high- block and the Qiangtang terrane at long 85°E are overlain by continental red beds of Eocene est plateau on Earth, with a mean elevation of are crosscut by undeformed granitoids dated at age (Qu et al., 2003) along a gently dipping 5 km above sea level (Fielding et al., 1994), has ca. 99 Ma, ca. 113 Ma, and ca. 153 Ma (Mur- unconformity (Fig. 1). These red beds contain long been attributed to India’s collision with phy et al., 1997). Likewise, shortening at 87°E abundant granitic detritus, indicating that the Asia (Argand, 1924; Dewey et al., 1988; Tap- occurred before ca. 118 Ma and there is no evi- granitoids had been exhumed to the surface by ponnier et al., 2001), which started ca. 50 Ma dence for deformation between the Cenomanian Eocene time. Field observations show that the (Patriat and Achache, 1984; Rowley, 1996; Naj- (ca. 95 Ma) and the early Tertiary (Kapp et al., peneplain exposes bedrock or is covered by man et al., 2010). However, the preceding accre- 2007). Hence, the thickened crust was subject to block fi elds generated by frost weathering of the tion of continental terranes to Asia (e.g., Dewey erosion for tens of millions of years before the granitoids (Fig. DR2A in the Data Repository). et al., 1988) raises the possibility that crustal collision of India, which may have reduced the Where present, the soil between the blocks is thickening, and hence surface uplift, occurred crustal thickness substantially before the India- thin (<30 cm) and contains large amounts of much earlier. It has been argued that the colli- Asia collision started. The detritus derived from granite grus. sion between the Lhasa block and the Qiantang the erosion of the Early Cretaceous orogen is terrane (Fig. 1A, inset) resulted in crustal short- partly preserved in the mid-Cretaceous Takena METHODS AND RESULTS ening, which may have raised southern Tibet to Formation of the Lhasa block (Dewey et al., We dated the emplacement age and the cool- an elevation of 3–4 km during the Cretaceous 1988; Leeder et al., 1988), but was also trans- ing history of the granitoids in the Bangoin (Murphy et al., 1997; Kapp et al., 2005, 2007). ported farther south and deposited in the Xigaze region with U/Pb geochronology and low-tem- However, the following observations suggest forearc basin (Dürr, 1996) located just north of perature thermochronological methods (Table 1; that crustal shortening in several regions of the the Indus-Yarlung suture (Fig. 1A, inset). Tables DR1–DR5). Five U/Pb ages reveal that Lhasa block and the Qiangtang terrane does Here we apply an independent approach the granitoids intruded their sedimentary host not necessarily imply that southern Tibet as a to constrain the early uplift of southern Tibet, rock between ca. 120 and ca. 110 Ma. The sub- whole reached a high elevation and remained which is based on quantifying the age and geo- sequent cooling history is constrained by seven high until the onset of the India-Asia collision. morphic evolution of a large bedrock peneplain First, marine limestones document that many using low-temperature thermochronology and 1GSA Data Repository item 2011287, geomorphic regions of southern Tibet remained close to sea cosmogenic nuclides. We use the term peneplain description of peneplain, details of geochronologic level until the Albian (ca. 100 Ma) or Cenoma- to denote a nearly featureless, gently undulating and cosmogenic radionuclide samples, and analy- ses, is available online at www.geosociety.org/pubs/ nian (ca. 95 Ma) (Marcoux et al., 1987; Leeder land surface of considerable area, which has ft2011.htm, or on request from editing@geosociety et al., 1988; Yin et al., 1988). Second, thrust been produced by erosion almost to base level .org or Documents Secretary, GSA, P.O. Box 9140, fault systems interpreted to have caused con- (cf. Jackson, 1997). Boulder, CO 80301, USA. © 2011 Geological Society of America. For permission to copy, contact Copyright Permissions, GSA, or [email protected]. GEOLOGY,Geology, October October 2011; 2011 v. 39; no. 10; p. 983–986; doi:10.1130/G32069.1; 2 fi gures; 2 tables; Data Repository item 2011287. 983 Downloaded from geology.gsapubs.org on September 13, 2011 89°50'E 90° 90°10' 89°50'E 90° A B Elevation (m) 5628 16.29 ± 0.50 31°30'N 31°30'N China 5350 H-30 5075 6.97 ± 0.22 H-24 H-31 12.61 ± 0.39 4800 India 7.90 ± 0.25 4524 DC-31 6.91 ± 0.22 90°10' H-29 Bangoin 10.66 ± 0.33 H-23 ult Qaidam Bangoin gh fa Ta basin tyn Al 11.09 ± 0.34 DC-33 Jinsha suture 31°20' 31°20' 14.47 ± 0.45 Qiangtang terrane 12.30 ± 0.38 Ba 6.76 ± 0.21 ngo ng suture study N Lhasa block area I 10.54 ± 0.33 ndus-Yarlung suture 6.58 ± 0.21 H i 6.44 ± 0.20 m a l 05 a y a km Grus Early Cretaceous granitoids Eocene red beds Local and catchment-wide Sample Bedrock Early Cretaceous sediments Alluvial sediments erosion rates (m/m.y.) 6.89 ± 0.22 type Stream sediment Figure 1. A: Geologic map of peneplain region in northern Lhasa block near town of Bangoin and sample locations. U/Pb dating and thermo- chronology performed on granitoid samples revealed their intrusion ages and their subsequent cooling history. Inset maps show continental terranes of Tibetan Plateau, bounded by suture zones, and depict their location in Central Asia. B: Digital elevation model (30 m resolution) of study area with local and catchment-wide erosion rates (m/m.y.) quantifi ed from concentrations of cosmogenic 10Be in quartz. Peneplain is in brown. TABLE 1. U/Pb AND THERMOCHRONOLOGICAL AGE DATA hence erosion rates, were presumably different Sample U/Pb age*† (U-Th)/He zircon age§ Apatite fi ssion track age§ (U-Th)/He apatite age§ from those today. On the fl at peneplain, where number (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) a thin veneer of soil is present between bedrock H-23 117.0 ± 2.8 77.1 ± 7.9 59.4 ± 2.3 56.2 ± 0.9 blocks in most areas, a warmer and more stable H-24 – 80.2 ± 5.0 58.5 ± 3.3 56.3 ± 0.7 climate in the Tertiary may have caused soils to H-29 111.7 ± 1.6 75.1 ± 6.6 56.8 ± 2.8 53.6 ± 1.2 be thicker than today.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 40. Appalachian Planation Surfaces
    Chapter 40 Appalachian Planation Surfaces The Appalachian region not only includes the mountains, but also the surrounding provinces. During the erosion episode (see Chapter 8 and Appendix 4), rocks of the Appalachians were sometimes planed into a flat or nearly flat planation surface, especially on the provinces east and west of the Blue Ridge Mountains (Figure 40.1). But planation surfaces are also found in the Appalachian Mountains, mainly on the mountaintops. Figure 40.1. Map of the Appalachian provinces and the two provinces to the west (from Aadland et al., 1992). Due to their rolling and dissected morphology, the Appalachian provinces are rarely called planation surfaces, but they would mostly be erosion surfaces. I will continue to use the more descriptive term, planation surface, with the understanding that many of these are erosion surfaces. The Appalachian provinces exhibit three possible planation surfaces, from east to west, they include: (1) the Piedmont Province, (2) the accordant mountaintops of the Valley and Ridge Province (part of the Appalachian Mountains), and (3) the Appalachian Plateau which is divided into the Allegheny Plateau in the north and the Cumberland Plateau in the south. I also will include the Interior Low Plateaus Province to the west of the Appalachian Plateau. Many articles have been published about the Appalachian planation surface. Their origin is controversial among secular geologists, but they can readily be explained by the runoff of the global Genesis Flood. Figure 40.2. Lake on the Piedmont near Parkersville, South Carolina, showing general flatness of the terrain. The Piedmont Planation Surface The Piedmont Province begins just east of the Blue Ridge Mountains from the Hudson River in the north to Alabama in the south.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms
    Title 430 – National Soil Survey Handbook Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms Subpart A – General Information 629.0 Definition and Purpose This glossary provides the NCSS soil survey program, soil scientists, and natural resource specialists with landform, geologic, and related terms and their definitions to— (1) Improve soil landscape description with a standard, single source landform and geologic glossary. (2) Enhance geomorphic content and clarity of soil map unit descriptions by use of accurate, defined terms. (3) Establish consistent geomorphic term usage in soil science and the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS). (4) Provide standard geomorphic definitions for databases and soil survey technical publications. (5) Train soil scientists and related professionals in soils as landscape and geomorphic entities. 629.1 Responsibilities This glossary serves as the official NCSS reference for landform, geologic, and related terms. The staff of the National Soil Survey Center, located in Lincoln, NE, is responsible for maintaining and updating this glossary. Soil Science Division staff and NCSS participants are encouraged to propose additions and changes to the glossary for use in pedon descriptions, soil map unit descriptions, and soil survey publications. The Glossary of Geology (GG, 2005) serves as a major source for many glossary terms. The American Geologic Institute (AGI) granted the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) permission (in letters dated September 11, 1985, and September 22, 1993) to use existing definitions. Sources of, and modifications to, original definitions are explained immediately below. 629.2 Definitions A. Reference Codes Sources from which definitions were taken, whole or in part, are identified by a code (e.g., GG) following each definition.
    [Show full text]
  • Erosional Cycles in the Front Range of Colorado and Their Correlation 1
    BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA W VOL. 36. PP. 498-512 SEPTEMBER 30. 1925 EROSIONAL CYCLES IN THE FRONT RANGE OF COLORADO AND THEIR CORRELATION 1 BY HOJIKR P. LITTLE (P resented in abstract before the Society December 29, J02J,1) CONTENTS Puice Introduction................................................. ......................................................................... 495 Peneplains of the Front Range................................................................................. 497 General statement...................................................................................................... 497 The Flattop peneplain............................................................................................... 498 The Rocky Mountain peneplain............................................................................. 500 The Park stage............................................................................................................. 504 The Fountain Creek stage....................................................................................... 507 The Canyon-cutting stage........................................................................................ 509 Age and correlation of erosion cycles..................................................... ............... 509 Discussion......................................................: ....................................................................... 510 Bibliography.........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Remarkable African Planation Surface Michael J
    Papers The remarkable African Planation Surface Michael J. Oard Geomorphology, within the uniformitarian paradigm, has great difficulty explaining the origin of landforms. One of these landforms, most of which were once much larger, is the planation surface. Planation surfaces are common and worldwide. They are not forming today but are being destroyed. Africa is covered with the most planation surfaces of any continent, but the number and age of the planation surfaces has always been controversial. A new synthesis of African planation surfaces concludes that there is one large, warped planation surface on Africa, called the African Surface. Most of the African Surface is capped by a chemical precipitate called a duricrust, the origin of which is a puzzle. Planation and erosion surfaces could readily have formed as the floodwater retreated off the continents during uplift. eologists once thought that by throwing out the Genesis minor forms such as hill, valley, slope, esker, and GFlood in Earth history they could easily explain the dune.”5 features of the earth’s surface. William Morris Davis, the Other names for geomorphology are ‘physiography’ most renowned geomorphologist in the early and mid- and ‘physical geography’. Various regions of the earth have twentieth century, stated: been subdivided according to similar geomorphology and “The emancipation of geology from the doctrine are called ‘provinces’. of catastrophism was a necessary step before The definition of ‘landform’ from the fifth edition of the progress could be made towards an understanding Glossary of Geology is the same as the one from the older of the lands.”1 Dictionary of Geological Terms,6 except for the addition As a result of this shift in worldview in the of the phrase “by natural processes”.
    [Show full text]
  • Formation Mechanism for Upland Low-Relief Surface Landscapes in the Three Gorges Region, China
    remote sensing Article Formation Mechanism for Upland Low-Relief Surface Landscapes in the Three Gorges Region, China Lingyun Lv 1,2, Lunche Wang 1,2,* , Chang’an Li 1,2, Hui Li 1,2 , Xinsheng Wang 3 and Shaoqiang Wang 1,2,4 1 Key Laboratory of Regional Ecology and Environmental Change, School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China; [email protected] (L.L.); [email protected] (C.L.); [email protected] (H.L.); [email protected] (S.W.) 2 Hubei Key Laboratory of Critical Zone Evolution, School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China 3 Hubei Key Laboratory of Regional Development and Environmental Response, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China; [email protected] 4 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 9 November 2020; Accepted: 26 November 2020; Published: 27 November 2020 Abstract: Extensive areas with low-relief surfaces that are almost flat surfaces high in the mountain ranges constitute the dominant geomorphic feature of the Three Gorges area. However, their origin remains a matter of debate, and has been interpreted previously as the result of fluvial erosion after peneplain uplift. Here, a new formation mechanism for these low-relief surface landscapes has been proposed, based on the analyses of low-relief surface distribution, swath profiles, χ mapping, river capture landform characteristics, and a numerical analytical model. The results showed that the low-relief surfaces in the Three Gorges area could be divided into higher elevation and lower elevation surfaces, distributed mainly in the highlands between the Yangtze River and Qingjiang River.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 41. Canadian Planation Surfaces
    Chapter 41 Canadian Planation Surfaces Chapters 36 to 40 summarized information on planation surfaces in the United States, but also included several planation surfaces on the High Plains of south-central Canada. There are numerous planation surfaces in the rest of Canada that are important for understanding the continent wide nature of Flood runoff. Figure 41.1 is a map of the geomorphological regions of Canada, many of which I will be mentioning in this chapter. Since Alaskan geomorphology is generally an extension of northwest Canadian geomorphology, Alaska will be included in this chapter on Canadian planation surfaces. Figure 41.1. The general geomorphological regions of Canada (from Bostock, 1970, p. 12). The Huge Canadian Shield Exhumed Planation Surface The Canadian Shield, west, south, and east of Hudson Bay (Figure 41.1) is a huge dissected planation surface.1,2 However, it is and exhumed planation surface (see Appendix 15). The surface was first planed, covered by sediments that hardened into rock, and then re-eroded 1 Bostock, H.S., 1970. Physiographic subdivisions of Canada. In, Douglas, R.J.W. (editor), Geology and Economic Minerals of Canada, Part A, Geological Survey of Canada, Economic Geology Report 1, Ottawa, Canada, pp. 9–30. 2 Ambrose, J.W., 1964. Exhumed paleoplains of the Precambrian Shield of North America. American Journal of Science 262:817–857. exposing most of the surface. The planation surface on the southeast part of the shield has been documented by Ian Juby,3 summarized in Appendix 18. The evidence for the Canadian Shield being a planation surface is that the surface continues underneath the sedimentary rocks that still remain on parts of the exhumed surface.4 It is also interesting that glaciation only superficially modified the planation surface,4 which is strange if there were 30 or more ice ages during the past 2.5 million years,5 as purported by uniformitarian scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of the High Elevated Pyrenean Peneplain Julien Babault, Jean Van Den Driessche, Stéphane Bonnet, Sébastien Castelltort, Alain Crave
    Origin of the high elevated Pyrenean peneplain Julien Babault, Jean van den Driessche, Stéphane Bonnet, Sébastien Castelltort, Alain Crave To cite this version: Julien Babault, Jean van den Driessche, Stéphane Bonnet, Sébastien Castelltort, Alain Crave. Origin of the high elevated Pyrenean peneplain. Tectonics, American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2005, 24 (2), art. no. TC2010, 19 p. 10.1029/2004TC001697. hal-00077900 HAL Id: hal-00077900 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00077900 Submitted on 29 Jun 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. TECTONICS, VOL. 24, TC2010, doi:10.1029/2004TC001697, 2005 Origin of the highly elevated Pyrenean peneplain Julien Babault, Jean Van Den Driessche, and Ste´phane Bonnet Ge´osciences Rennes, UMR CNRS 6118, Universite´ de Rennes 1, Rennes, France Se´bastien Castelltort Department of Earth Sciences, Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule-Zentrum, Zurich, Switzerland Alain Crave Ge´osciences Rennes, UMR CNRS 6118, Universite´ de Rennes 1, Rennes, France Received 9 June 2004; revised 5 December 2004; accepted 13 December 2004; published 19 April 2005. [1] Peneplanation of mountain ranges is generally base level in the penultimate stage of a humid, fluvial considered the result of long-term erosional processes geomorphic cycle.’’ They specify that ‘‘peneplain’’ also that smooth relief and lower elevation near sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Etchplain, Rock Pediments, Glacises and Morphostructural Analysis of the Bohemian Massif (Czech Republic) Jaromir Demek [email protected] Rudka Č
    GeoMorfostrukturnímorfologický a sborník tektonické 2 problémy ČAG, ZČU v Plzni, 2003 Etchplain, rock pediments, glacises and morphostructural analysis of the Bohemian Massif (Czech Republic) Jaromir Demek [email protected] Rudka č. 66, Kunštát na Moravě CZ 679 72 The Bohemian Massif forms the western part of Czech Republic. The massif belongs to the Western European Platform, which basement was consolidated by Variscan folding. The Bohemian Massif is characterized by a typical platform regime during Mesozoic and Paleogene Periods, i.e. by low intensity of tectonic movements and slight relief differentiation. This regime was reflected in a structural compatibility and morphological uniformity of the Massif, with altitudes of its planated surface (mostly peneplain with thick regolith mantle) ranging from 0 to 200 m a.s.l. The present-day relief of the Bohemian Massif developed for the most part in the Neotectonic period (Upper Oligocene to Quaternary). The older idea that o the Bohemian Massif responded to stresses caused by neotectonic movements generally as a rigid unit (with some differences in individual regions) and o that in the Bohemian Massif preserved in very large extent old peneplain (KUNSKÝ, 1968, p. 27), seams to be abandoned now. Already in 1930 Ms. Julie Moschelesová proposed the hypothesis of neotectonic megaanticlinals and megasynclinals in the basement of the Bohemian Massif. At present the Bohemian Massif is understood as a complex mountain, which relief is composed of megaanticlinals and megasynclinals, horstes and grabens and volcanic mountains? Individual parts of the Bohemian Massif moved in different directions and with different intensity during Neotectonic Period. The determination of directions, intensity and type of Neotectonic deformations of the Earth’s crust is difficult due to lack of correlated deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Observation in Geomorphology
    2 Observation in Geomorphology Bruce L. Rhoads and Colin E. Thorn Department of Geography, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ABSTRACT Observation traditionally has occupied a central position in geomorphologic research. The prevailing, tacit attitude of geomorphologists toward observation appears to be consistent with radical empiricism. This attitude stems from a strong historical emphasis on the value of fieldwork in geomorphology, which has cultivated an aesthetic for letting the data speak for themselves, and from cursory and exclusive exposure of many geomorphologists to empiricist philosophical doctrines, especially logical positivism. It is, by and large, also an unexamined point of view. This chapter provides a review of contemporary philosophical perspectives on scientific observation. This discussion is then used as a filter or lens through which to view the epistemic character and role of observation in geomorphology. Analysis reveals that whereas G.K. Gilbert's theory-laden approach to observation preserved scientific objectivity, the extreme theory-ladenness of W.M. Davis's observational procedures often resulted in considerable subjectivity. Contemporary approaches to observation in geomorphology are shown to conform broadly with the model provided by Gilbert. The hallmark of objectivity in geomorphology is the assurance of data reliability through the introduction of fixed rule-based procedures for obtaining information. INTRODUCTION Geomorphologists traditionally have assigned great virtue to observation. The venerated status of observation can be traced to the origin of geomorphology as a field science in the late 1800s. Exploration of sparsely vegetated landscapes in the American West by New- berry, Powell, Hayden, Gilbert, and others inspired perceptive insights about landscape dynamics that provided a foundation for the discipline (Baker and Twidale 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • A Geomorphic Classification System
    A Geomorphic Classification System U.S.D.A. Forest Service Geomorphology Working Group Haskins, Donald M.1, Correll, Cynthia S.2, Foster, Richard A.3, Chatoian, John M.4, Fincher, James M.5, Strenger, Steven 6, Keys, James E. Jr.7, Maxwell, James R.8 and King, Thomas 9 February 1998 Version 1.4 1 Forest Geologist, Shasta-Trinity National Forests, Pacific Southwest Region, Redding, CA; 2 Soil Scientist, Range Staff, Washington Office, Prineville, OR; 3 Area Soil Scientist, Chatham Area, Tongass National Forest, Alaska Region, Sitka, AK; 4 Regional Geologist, Pacific Southwest Region, San Francisco, CA; 5 Integrated Resource Inventory Program Manager, Alaska Region, Juneau, AK; 6 Supervisory Soil Scientist, Southwest Region, Albuquerque, NM; 7 Interagency Liaison for Washington Office ECOMAP Group, Southern Region, Atlanta, GA; 8 Water Program Leader, Rocky Mountain Region, Golden, CO; and 9 Geology Program Manager, Washington Office, Washington, DC. A Geomorphic Classification System 1 Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 5 I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 6 History of Classification Efforts in the Forest Service ............................................................... 6 History of Development .............................................................................................................. 7 Goals
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Review of the San Juan Peneplain Southwestern Color~ Do
    Critical Review of the San Juan Peneplain Southwestern Color~ do GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 594-I Critical Review of the San Juan Peneplain Southwestern Colorado By THOMAS A. STEVEN SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL -PAPER 594-I The volcanic and geomorphic history of the San Juan Mountains indicates no peneplain cycle of erosion between the end of ma;·or volcanism and the present time UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1968 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Albstract ----------------------------------------­ I 1 Discussion of the San Juan peneplain-Continued Introduction -------------------------------------­ 1 3. The peneplain remnants -------------------- 18 Alcknowledgments --------------------------------- 2 4. Postpeneplain deformation -------------------- 9 General geology of the San Juan region ___________ _ 2 5. Postpeneplain alluviation and volcanism ______ _ 10 The peneplain concept ----------------------------­ 4 6. Postpeneplain development of drainage_------- 12 Discussion of the San Juan peneplain -------------- 6 Possible character of the late Tertiary landscape ___ _ 13 1. Subsidence of the prevolcanism erosion surface _ 6 Summary ----·------------------------------------ 14 2. Volcanism and volcano-tectonic deformation Catalog of peneplain remnants ----------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 51. Does the Weathering Hypothesis Explain Planation
    Chapter 51 Does the Weathering Hypothesis Explain Planation Surfaces? Like Davis’s hypothesis, all the other hypotheses of landscape evolution that were developed over a period of more than 100 years, have been found wanting (see Appendix 19). Only one major hypothesis remains, the weathering hypothesis, also called etchplanation. It attempts to explain flat or nearly flat surfaces. The Weathering Hypothesis Weathering is defined as the in situ alteration and/or disintegration of rocks at or near the earth’s surface.1 Erosion is, “The general process or the group of processes whereby the materials of the Earth’s crust are loosened, dissolved, or worn away, and simultaneously moved from one place to another…2 Denudation is, “The sum of the processes that result in the wearing away or progressive lowering the Earth’s surface by various natural agencies, which include weathering, erosion, mass wasting, and transportion…”3 Denudation has a wider meaning than erosion and also includes the physical removal of the eroded or weathered material from the area and not just the movement of material a little. The weathering hypothesis was first proposed by J.D. Falconer in 1911.4 It was especially emphasized and developed by Wayland in the early 1930s and by Bailey Willis in his study of East African plateaus and rift valleys.5 The hypothesis was advanced by Büdel during the third quarter of the twentieth century, primarily to account for tropical erosion and planation surfaces.6 The weathering hypothesis seems to be the only one that is seriously considered by geomorphologists, but that of course does not mean it is correct.
    [Show full text]