Overview of Stevedoring Sector in Russia in 2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Overview of Stevedoring Sector in Russia in 2016 Overview of Stevedoring Sector in Russia in 2016 With the support of: Table of Contents Introduction 1 Current Market Positions of Russian Seaports 2 Steady Growth 5 Cargo Turnover Trends in Russian Seaports 5 Major Market Players in Russia, 2016 7 Cargo Turnover Across Russian Sea Basins 9 Development Prospects 11 Sources of Financing 16 State Support for Private Investments 20 Public Private Partnerships 20 VAT Breaks 23 Tax Breaks for Investors in the Free Port of Vladivostok 24 Constraints 26 Railway Infrastructure 27 Relations with Customs Authorities 30 Conclusion 32 Contacts 33 Introduction The stevedoring sector is an integral link in the international trade chain. Around 60% of Russia’s cargo imports and exports are processed in seaports¹. The balanced and timely development of port infrastructure should improve the competitiveness of Russian exports on the global market. The stevedoring sector has been developing impressively over the last 16 years: between 2000 and 2016 the cargo turnover of Russian seaports increased almost four-fold. Moreover, it is forecast to increase by another 14%-18% by 20202. EY closely monitors the current processes. We prepared this report with the support of the Association of Commercial Seaports in order to analyze expert opinions about further development of the sector, key constraints, and sources of financing for investment projects. We conducted a market survey for this report to learn respondents’ opinions on a number of key issues. The survey covered 26 companies, including stevedoring holding companies, stevedoring operating companies, and raw material suppliers who own cargo terminals in seaports. Among respondents were top managers, including CEOs, CFOs, Sales Directors, Strategy Directors, and Logistics Directors. We thank all the participants for sharing their opinions, and we hope this overview will be of use to both them and a wider range of investors. 1 https://customs.news/porty-rossii-obespechivayut-60-ved-strany/ 2 According to Federal Target Program “Development of the Transportation System in Russia (2010-2020)” as amended on 27 February 2017 Overview of Stevedoring Sector in Russia in 2016 | 1 Current Market Positions of Russian Seaports International trade is the main driver Foreign Trade Turnover of Select Countries, 2016, trillion US dollars behind the development of the port 4.0 industry. Around 90% of cargo is 3.7 3.7 3.5 transported by sea3. The US and China were the leading countries in terms of 3.0 2.3 foreign trade turnover in 2016 ($3.7 2.5 trillion each), while Russia’s turnover was 2.0 around $0.5 trillion. 1.5 1.3 Trillion dollars USA dollars Trillion 1.0 0.8 Foreign trade turnover in Russia declined 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 by 11.4% YoY in dollar terms in 20164, 0.0 which was mostly due to the reduced China USA Germany Japan Canada India Russia Australia exports in monetary terms because Sources: The Central Intelligence Agency, CBR of low raw materials prices. In volume terms, however, exports of Russia’s main products, coal and oil, increased by 9.6% Cargo Transhipment Structure in Russian Seaports by Cargo Destination, 2016, % and 4.2%, respectively. Since raw material exports account for the majority of cargo 10% turnover in Russian seaports, the positive 7% trend in volume terms helped sustain the Exports growth in overall cargo turnover. 4% 722 Imports million tons Transit Cabotage 79% Source: Seaports, No. 1, 2017 3 https://business.un.org/en/entities/13 4 Central Bank of Russia 2 | Overview of Stevedoring Sector in Russia in 2016 As well as foreign trade volumes, the cargo Cargo Turnover of Major Seaports in Europe, million tons turnover and concentration of seaports in any particular country are impacted by 445 Rotterdam 466 the length of the coastline, the location of 461 the manufacturers, and internal logistical 199 routes, which determine whether transit Antwerp 208 214 cargo flows can be serviced. Despite 146 comparable foreign trade volumes, the Hamburg 138 coastline in China is 37% shorter than that 138 of the USA (14.5 thous. km vs 19.9 thous. 122 Novorossiysk 127 km)5. The above factors explain why 131 most of the giant ports, including Ningbo, 95 Algeciras 98 Tianjin, Shanghai, and Qingdao (with cargo 103 flows of over 500 million tons per annum), 76 are located in China. Ust-Luga 88 93 Russia’s foreign trade volume is about 79 Marseille 82 one-seventh of China’s, while the coastline 81 is 54% longer (22.4 thous. km vs 14.5 80 thous. km). These factors in particular Amsterdam 78 79 explain why Russia has no giant seaports 78 with cargo turnover comparable to the Bremen 73 largest seaports of China. Nevertheless, 74 the scale of the main ports in Western 67 Valencia 70 Russia is comparable to the largest ones 71 in Europe, and Russia’s port industry as a 61 whole is extremely promising in terms of Saint Petersburg 52 49 opportunities for both increasing foreign 2014 2015 2016 trade volumes and developing internal logistics routes to service transit cargo Sources: ACS, data of foreign ports flows. The largest volume of cargo in Russia in As of year-end 2016, the Register of 2016 (131 million tons) was processed by Seaports in Russia included 67 seaports6, Novorossiysk commercial seaport, which located along the seashores of 12 seas ranked fourth amongst European ports. that lead to three oceans as well as the Moreover, the cargo turnover steadily Caspian Sea. In geographical terms, increased between 2014 and 2016. Russian seaports are located in five sea basins (Baltic, Azov-Black Sea, Caspian, The new port of Ust-Luga has also steadily Arctic, and Far Eastern). increased cargo turnover, having captured volumes from Big port Saint Petersburg, The three largest seaports in Russia in which, in turn, had recorded a declining terms of transhipment volumes in 2016 trend. It is worth noting that the combined were Novorossiysk (38.6 million tons of cargo turnover of Ust-Luga port and Big dry cargo and 92.8 million tons of liquid port Saint Petersburg increased by 1.4% in cargo), Ust-Luga (30.9 million tons of 2016, while the largest seaport in Europe, dry cargo and 62.5 million tons of liquid Rotterdam, posted a decline of 1.1%. cargo), and Vostochny (35.8 million tons of dry cargo and 32.7 million tons of liquid cargo)7. 5 https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/ 6 Source: Rosstat, http://www.morflot.ru/deyatelnost/morskoy_transport/reestr_mp.html Overview of Stevedoring Sector in Russia in 2016 | 3 7 Source: Seaports, No. 2, 2017 Largest Seaports of Russia in Terms of Cargo Transhipments, 2016 Azov-Black Sea basin 10 8 Liquid Dry cargo, 7 No. Seaport cargo, million tons million tons 9 1 Novorossiysk 92.8 38.6 2 Kavkaz 12.6 20.6 3 Tuapse 16.3 8.9 14 4 Taman 10.7 2.8 5 Rostov-on-Don 3.8 9.2 11 6 Azov 0.4 6.2 15 16 17 Baltic basin Liquid Dry cargo, No. Seaport cargo, million tons million tons 7 Ust-Luga 62.5 30.9 23 25 8 Primorsk 64.4 - 21 9 Big port Saint 6.54 42.1 19 Petersburg 13 10 Vysotsk 11 6.1 12 11 Kaliningrad 2.4 9.3 5 Caspian basin 2 Liquid Dry cargo, 4 18 No. Seaport cargo, 6 million tons 20 million tons 22 12 Makhachkala 2.8 0.4 1 13 Astrakhan 0.03 2.6 3 24 Arctic basin Liquid Dry cargo, No. Seaport cargo, million tons million tons 14 Murmansk 11.4 22 15 Varandey 8 - 16 Sabetta 2.8 - 17 Dudinka 1.2 Far-Eastern basin Liquid Dry cargo, No. Seaport cargo, million tons million tons 18 Vostochny 32.7 35.8 19 Vanino 2.3 27.9 20 Nakhodka 6.6 16.7 21 Prigorodnoye 16.4 - 22 Vladivostok 3.1 11.3 23 DeKastri 11.3 0.2 24 Posyet 1 7.2 25 Shakhtersk - 4 Sources: Seaports, No. 2, 2017, EY analysis. 4 | Overview of Stevedoring Sector in Russia in 2016 Steady Growth Cargo Transhipment Accumulative Growth Indices in 2009-2016, % Trends in Russian 180% 170% 169% Seaports 160% 150% 145% The increase in cargo transhipment 140% 141% 130% volumes across Russian seaports in 127% 120% 2009-2013 was largely in line with the 110% 110% growth of international sea trade. Further, 100% despite the negative Russian GDP growth, 90% it has even exceeded the global growth 80% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 level since 2014. Moreover, the increase Dry cargo in Russia Global sea trade in cargo transhipment volumes across Liquid cargo in Russia Russian GDP (in real prices) Russian seaports has outperformed the Transhipment of all types Global GDP (in real prices) increase in Russian exports as a whole. of cargo in Russia Russian exports (in real prices) Thus, Russia’s stevedoring sector Sources: Rosstat, Oxford Economics, Clarkson research, EY analysis. demonstrated steady positive growth in cargo handling in 2009-2016. Over Cargo Transhipment in Russian Seaports in 2009-2016, million tons that period, cargo transhipment volumes across Russian seaports increased by 722 677 almost 1.5 times, from 496 million tons to 589 624 526 536 567 722 million tons. 496 386 331 364 315 334 301 It is worth noting that the increase in 298 314 dry cargo transhipment volumes has 292 312 336 significantly outperformed that of liquid 198 212 235 252 256 cargo. This trend is due to the more than two-fold increase in coal transhipment 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 in Russian seaports in 2009-2016, while Dry cargo Liquid cargo crude oil transhipments barely increased in Source: Rosstat Overview of Stevedoring Sector in Russia in 2016 | 5 2009-2015, starting to grow steadily only Cargo Turnover Growth across Russian Seaports in 2016 vs 2015 by Cargo Type, in 2016.
Recommended publications
  • East Russia Economic Agenda
    The Far East Development Fund Energy tariffs for will participate in the industrial consumers implementation of will be reduced three new projects Russia welcomes For Japanese Japanese business The Eastern Port is now companies, Russia a resident of the Free is a new frontier for in the Far East Port business opportunities EAST RUSSIA No. 2 | JAN 2017 ECONOMIC AGENDA EVENTS FACTS AND OPINIONS LAW ENFORCEMENT PROJECTS • The boundaries of • 421 projects, the new • FAW trucks will be • The construction the Komsomolsk ASEZ mechanisms give manufactured in the of a fertilizer plant will be extended 1225 billion rubles Free Port • The construction of • ASEZ will be created in • Development of the • Cashew nuts will be the thermal insulating Nikolayevsk-on-Amur Far East: map produced in the Free paint production plant Port Chinese investors hone in on projects A new coal terminal is in Primorye to be built in Vanino 10 facts about the Yakut winter Contacts: The investor of the Free www.investvostok.ru What life is like in the coldest region Port will build social +7 (495) 540 41-63 of the Far East housing [email protected] Official Bulletin of the Ministry for development of the Russian Far East. This document was prepared by The Far East Investment and Export Agency, an autonomous non-commercial organization. Distributed by subscription. When using materials, reference to the source is required. JAN’17 EASTERN RUSSIA ECONOMIC AGENDA EVENTS 6–7 September6–7 September 2017 2017 Official Bulletin of the Ministry for development of the Russian Far East. This document was prepared by All published information is relevant as of January 17, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Seaports in Russia
    SEAPORTS IN RUSSIA FLANDERS INVESTMENT & TRADE MARKET SURVEY Russian seaports November 2015 André DE RIJCK, Vlaams Economisch Vertegenwoordiger in Moskou Economic Representation of Flanders c/o Embassy of Belgium Mytnaya st. 1, bld.1, entrance 2, 119049 Moscow, RUSSIA T: +7 499 238 60 85/96 | F: +7 499 238 51 15 [email protected] Table of Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Russian largest seaports top-7 by cargo turnover ........................................................................................................... 4 Brief analysis of seaport infrastructure in Russia............................................................................................................. 4 Dynamics of cargo turnover of Russian seaports (2010-2014 yy in mln.tons) ................................................. 5 Cargo turnover structure in 2014 (mln tons, “%” year–on–year changes compared to 2013) ............... 6 The dynamics of cargo turnover by essentials categories in 2013-2014 yy. (in mln.tons) ......................... 7 Structure of the cargo turnover by category in 2014 ..................................................................................................... 8 The cargo turnover structure by Russian ports in 2014 in mln.tons ..................................................................... 9 Russian seaports market share structure
    [Show full text]
  • Argus Russian Coal
    Argus Russian Coal Issue 17-36 | Monday 9 October 2017 MARKET COmmENTARY PRICES Turkey lifts coal imports from Russia Russian coal prices $/t Turkey increased receipts of Russian thermal coal by 9pc on Delivery basis NAR kcal/kg Delivery period 6 Oct ± 29 Sep the year in January-August, to 7.79mn t, according to data fob Baltic ports 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 86.97 -0.20 from statistics agency Tuik, amid higher demand from utili- fob Black Sea ports 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 90.63 -0.25 ties and households. Russian material replaced supplies from cif Marmara* 6,000 Nov 17 100.33 0.33 South Africa, which redirected part of shipments to more fob Vostochny 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 100.00 1.00 profitable markets in Asia-Pacific this year. fob Vostochny 5,500 Nov-Dec 17 87.0 0 1.75 *assessment of Russian and non-Russian coal In August Russian coal receipts rose to over 1.26mn t, up by 15pc on the year and by around 19pc on the month. Russian coal prices $/t This year demand for sized Russian coal is higher com- Delivery basis NAR kcal/kg Delivery period Low High pared with last year because of colder winter weather in 2016-2017, a Russian supplier says. Demand for coal fines fob Baltic ports 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 85.25 88.00 fob Black Sea ports 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 89.50 91.00 from utilities has also risen amid the launch of new coal- fob Vostochny 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 100.00 100.00 fired capacity, the source adds.
    [Show full text]
  • Specifics and Conditions of Russian Far East Seaports Development Within the Framework of International Transport and Logistic Corridors
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Marine Science&Education, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2012, pp. 59-65 SPECIFICS AND CONDITIONS OF RUSSIAN FAR EAST SEAPORTS DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT AND LOGISTIC CORRIDORS Andrey I. Fisenko The article analyses the current state and ways of development of Russian Far East seaports in the environment of national and international «East-West» transport- logistic corridors creation, as well as possibility of their integration into transnational cargo and passenger transportation system. Keywords: sea ports, port-hub, international transport corridors, transport centre. According to the federal document (draft) “Strategy of Russian Ports Infrastructure Development till 2030” developed by specialists from the Government and the largest maritime sector companies of the Russian Federation, Russia should work out the following main objectives [2] to create national seaport infrastructure with high competitive abilities at international level: - provision of sufficient capacities for cargo transhipment ; - provision of economically efficient port infrastructure; - achievement of internationally competitive services provided by the Russian seaports; - ensuring safe and secure development and daily activity of the seaport infrastructure and maritime transport; - solution of social issues of the seaport infrastructure development. The decision to start transport complex modernization in accordance 58 59 Andrey I. Fisenko with the Transport Strategy of the Russian Federation stipulates the development of the Europe-East Asia transport corridors. In this case according to the logistic scheme, the main traffic flows should pass through the ports of the Far East of Russia [1]. The perspective cargo base tending to the Russian Far East basin is expertly estimated in 400 million tones including 160 million tons of bulk liquids and 240 million tons of dry cargo.
    [Show full text]
  • INDIA-RUSSIA Identifying New Opportunities Contents Russian Federation Fact Sheet
    INDIA-RUSSIA Identifying New Opportunities Contents Russian Federation Fact Sheet . 3 n Why Russia? . 3 n Russia vs Rest of World comparison . 6 Russian Far East. 8 n Why the Russian Far East. 8 Title : India-Russia: Identifying New Opportunities v Russia Far East - Basic Facts . 9 Year : September 2017 v International Importance of the Russia Far East . 10 Copyright : No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form by photo, photoprint, microfilm or any other means n without the written permission of FICCI and Ernst & Young Far East and the world. 11 Disclaimer: The information and opinions contained in this document have been compiled or arrived at from sources v International relations . 11 believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty expressed is made to their accuracy, completeness or correctness. This document is for information purpose only. The information contained in this document is published for n Opportunities for Indian Industry. 11 the assistance of the recipient but is not to be relied upon as authoritative or taken in substitution for the exercise of judgment by any recipient. This document is not intended to be a Reverse SEZs with Russian Far East. 13 substitute for professional, technical or legal advice. All opinions expressed in this document are subject to n change without notice. Background. 13 FICCI and Ernst & Young do not accept any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss howsoever arising from n Reverse SEZs Example. 14 any use of this document or its contents or otherwise arising in connection herewith. 1 Contents Russian Federation Fact Sheet .
    [Show full text]
  • Report: GTI Trade and Investment Cooperation
    GTI Trade and Investment Cooperation Proceedings of the Roundtable Meeting on 30 August 2017 Changchun, PR China Greater Tumen Initiative (GTI) Secretariat Tayuan Diplomatic Compound 1-1-142 No.1 Xindong Lu, Chaoyang District Beijing, 100600, China www. tumenprogramme. org Tel:+86-10-653205543 Fax: +86-10-6532-6465 [email protected] ©2017 by Greater Tumen Initiative The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Greater Tumen Initiative (GTI). GTIdoes not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accept no responsibil- ity for any consequence of their use. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, GTI doesnot intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Cover Photo by: Greater Tumen Initiative (on the top) Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH (on the bottom left) Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH (on the bottom right) The GTI Trade and Investment Roundtable Meeting and this report was prepared with financial sup- port from Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, commissioned by the German Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) Contributors: The following persons contributed to this report: Dorothea LAZARO, KIM Jin Ho, YANG Zhengwei, LI Shuai,, Bayarsaikhan DELGER, Doo Jung Soo, Battsetseg TUVSHINTUGS, HONG Hyun Mun, Vladimir VAGANOV, Munkh-Orgil BATBAYAR, HEO Seong Moo, Igor KRESTININ, JIANG Qiao, GAO Ming, Lkhagvasuren LKHAGVA, HONG JongMin, ZHANG Yuebin, KANG Daehyun, Magnus C.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Russian Sea Port Infrastructure. Automotive Logistics
    Development of the Russian Sea Port Infrastructure. Automotive Logistics. Container Logistics in Russia. ɝ. ɋɚɧɤɬ-ɉɟɬɟɪɛɭɪɝ, ɭɥ. ɉɨɥɢɬɟɯɧɢɱɟɫɤɚɹ, ɞ. 29 Ɍɟɥɟɮɨɧ: (812) 333-13-10, Ɏɚɤɫ: (812) 333-13-11 e-mail: [email protected] www.morproekt.ru 1 Morstroytechnology, LLC (MST for short) Our engineering background contributes to the approach to logistic analysis. We focus on: Pre-Design Research: Feasibility Study, Business Planning, Development Concepts etc. ; Engineering and Design: • universal and dedicated port terminals (general cargo, container, dry bulk, liquid bulk etc.); • logistic centers and related infrastructure; • optimization of hydraulic constructions Supervision; General Design; Consulting and Engineering; Berths and Buildings Survey; Engineering Survey; Marketing Research, traffic forecasting; Logistic Strategy; Logistic Optimization; Feasibility Study http://www.morproekt.ru/ 2 Plan Changes in Logistic and Infrastructure. Transformation of the Soviet Transport System «Renaissance» of Port Construction in 1990-2000. Growth Factors Review of Cargo Flows. Modal Split Russian Transport System Geography Baltic Sea. Throughput of the Baltic Sea Ports Main Development Projects in the Inner Harbors of St. Petersburg St. Petersburg Outer Ports Development Projects Ports Ust-Luga, Vysotsk, Kaliningrad Russian Transport System Geography – Arctic. Throughput of the Arctic Ports Murmansk Transport Node. Development of SCP Murmansk, Lavna, Sabetta Terminal at Cape Kamenniy – Branch of Sabetta Port Black and Azov Seas. Ports’ Throughput Ports Taman, Novorossiysk Caspian Sea. Ports’ Throughput Far Eastern Ports. Ports’ Throughput Coal terminals at the Far East – Vostochny, Vanino, others Oil and oil products terminals on the Far East of Russia Disproportion of Sea Port and Railway Infrastructure Russian Automotive Logistics Market Russian Container Market http://www.morproekt.ru/ 3 Long-period Changes in Logistic and Infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Argus Russian Coal TWICE MONTHLY Volume V Issue No 20 Friday 15 October 2010
    www.argusmedia.com Argus Russian Coal TWICE MONTHLY Volume V Issue No 20 Friday 15 October 2010 Exports show mixed results Monthly average prices* $/t Russian seaborne coal exports are showing a decline on last year fob Baltic fob Yuzhny fob Vostochny but remain higher than in 2008. In January-September 66.9mn t of Sep 90.8 95.0 101.7 coal was dispatched from the ports compared with 70mn t in the Aug 90.8 95.2 104.0 * 6,000 Kcal NAR, up to 1% sulphur, delivery in 90 days same period of 2009 and 61.8mn t in the same nine months of 2008. Shipments to Asia this year are significantly higher than in the Coal export dynamics: Major northwest ports ’000t previous years although they are obstructed by railway problems. Murmansk Ust-Luga Riga In September less than 2.6mn t was shipped through the far east 1,200 ports compared with 3mn t in August 2010 and the same amount 1,100 in September 2009 (see table p2). The largest far east outlet, 1,000 Vostochny port, handled just over 1mn t — but part of the sched- 900 800 uled tonnage failed to arrive as a result of the railcar shortage and 700 lack of coal, the port says. But the nine-month figure for the far east 600 ports dwarfs the results of 2009 and 2008 (see chart p9). 500 Exports to northwest Europe increased compared with the pre- 400 vious months to nearly 3.6mn t in September, and many ports were Sep 09 Nov 09 Jan 10 Mar 10 May 10 Jul 10 Sep 10 able to reduce their accumulated stocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward Expanding Japan–Russia–China Multimodal Transportation
    Toward Expanding Japan–Russia–China Multimodal Transportation Toward Expanding Japan–Russia–China Multimodal Transportation ARAI, Hirofumi Director and Senior Research Fellow, Research Division, ERINA ZHU, Yonghao Associate Professor, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Fukushima University / ERINA Collaborative Researcher LI, Jinbo Director, Strategy Research Center, People’s Government of Suifenhe City Introduction decline. As shown in Table 1, while there was an increasing It would be no exaggeration to say that the economic trend for the trade volumes with Japan of China’s Northeast relationship between Japan and China is the closest bilateral from 2000 on, its share of Japan–China trade went from relationship in the world. However, within China’s 12.4% in 2000 to 7.3% in 2012 for exports, and from 7.6% Northeast, which is geographically close to Japan, the in 2000 to 4.4% in 2012 for imports. This is due to Japan– relationship between Japan and the inland provinces of Jilin China trade being concentrated in coastal areas, such as the and Heilongjiang is comparatively weak. At present for Pearl River Delta, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Bohai Japan’s trade with these areas, there is no alternative but to Sea Rim. use a circuitous route via Dalian, Yingkou and other ports on Second, taking a look at the trade volumes with Japan of the Bohai Sea. However, if the ports of Russia’s Primorsky each of the Northeast provinces, it can be seen that Liaoning Krai are used, it will be possible to greatly shorten the Province has a runaway lead.
    [Show full text]
  • Euro Asian Transport Links Inland Vs
    EURO ASIAN TRANSPORT LINKS INLAND VS. MARITIME TRANSPORT: COMPARISON STUDY This study was undertaken as part of the UNECE Expert Group on Euro-Asian Transport Links (EATL) under the EATL project Phase II. This draft cannot be quoted nor cited as it is the subject of approval by the governments of countries participating in the EATL EG. Any comments about this study may be provided to [email protected]. 8 November 2010 DRAFT FOR COMMENTS ONLY (Not to be cited or quoted) Contents Contents................................................................................................................................................2 LIST OF FIGURES................................................................................................................................3 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS................................................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................5 CHAPTER 1: TRADE BETWEEN ASIA AND EUROPE.................................................................8 CHAPTER 2 BLOCK TRAINS IN EUROPE AND ASIA ...............................................................13 EXISTING BLOCK TRAINS IN EUROPE – ASIA .............................................................................................13 Poti – Baku ...................................................................................................................................13 Vostochny,
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Current Status of the Multimodal Transport Via Ferry in the GTR
    EVALUATION STUDY ON THE SEA-LAND ROUTES IN NORTHEAST ASIA 2014 Greater Tumen Initiative (GTI) Secretariat Tayuan Diplomatic Compound 1-1-142 No. 1 Xindong Lu, Chaoyang District Beijing, 100600, China www.tumenprogramme.org Tel: +86-10-6532-5543 Fax: +86-10-6532-6465 [email protected] The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Greater Tumen Initiative (GTI) or members of its Consultative Commission and Transport Board or the governments they represent. GTI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, GTI does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. “Evaluation Study on the Sea-Land Routes in Northeast Asia” was financed and carried out by Korea Maritime Institute, Dr. Lee Sung-woo, Dr. Kim Geun-sub and Dr. Kim Eun-woo. The Study aimed at assessment of the problems and impediments for ferry services in East/Japan Sea. The Study results and conclusions serve to facilitate the intermodal transportation services in the Greater Tumen Region through the promotion of the land-sea shipping lines. FOREWORD Northeast Asia is one of the fastest growing economic blocks in the world. It carries large clout in the global economy and trade due remarkable growth it has posted so far.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Conditions for Socio-Economic Development in Russian Regions
    Online ISSN 2412-0731 Сertificate of registration media ЭЛ № ФС77-61272 from April 3, 2015 www.r-economy.ru 2019, 5(1) Online ISSN 2412-0731 Published quarterly Founded in 2015 r-economy.ru 2019, 5(1) Founders Contact information Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch 19 Mira St., 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia of the Russian Academy of Sciences phone: +7 (343) 375-95-23 The Ural Federal University named e-mail: [email protected] after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin Editor-in-Chief Irina D. Turgel, Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin (Ekaterinburg, Russia) Deputy Editor-in-Chief Aleksandr A. Kuklin, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (Ekaterinburg, Russia) Gavriil A. Agarkov, Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin (Ekaterinburg, Russia) International Board Gianni Betti, Associate Professor of Statistics, Yulia G. Lavrikova, Acting Director, Institute The University of Siena (Siena, Italy) of Economics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Ekaterinburg, Russia) Isolde Brade, Senior Researcher, Leibniz Institute for Regional Geography (Leipzig, Germany) Vitaly N. Lazhentsev, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Syktyvkar, Russia) Valery A. Chereshnev, Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Perm, Russia) Valery L. Makarov, Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow, Russia) Igor M. Drapkin, Professor of Economics, Ural Federal University (Ekaterinburg, Russia) Marina Yu. Malkina, Professor of Economics, Lobachevsky University (Nizhny Novgorod, Russia) Oleg Yu. Golubchikov, Senior Lecturer in Human Geography, Cardiff University (Cardiff, Wales) Marko D.
    [Show full text]