<<

Pharmacological Reports Copyright © 2012 2012, 64, 305–314 by Institute of Pharmacology ISSN 1734-1140 Polish Academy of Sciences

Influenceofcalciumchannelblockerson andantinociceptiveactivitiesof valproicacidinpentylenetetrazole-kindledmice

MonaF.El-Azab,YasserM.Moustafa

DepartmentofPharmacologyandToxicology,FacultyofPharmacy,SuezCanalUniversity,Ismailia41522,Egypt

Correspondence: MonaF.El-Azab,e-mail: [email protected];[email protected]

Abstract: Backgroud: Comorbidities of comprise some pain disorders, including acute nociceptive pain, therefore, antiepileptic drugs can prove efficacy in the management of this kind of pain albeit with several adverse reactions. The current study aimed to evaluate the modulatory effects of blockers on the anticonvulsant and antinociceptive effects of valproic acid (VPA) inpentylenetetrazole(PTZ)-kindledmice. Methods: Kindled mice were treated with 20 mg/kg (ip) of , , or , then VPA (200 mg/kg, ip) at 30 min intervalsbeforePTZadministration(35mg/kg, ip). Results: Our data demonstrated that the three calcium channel blockers afforded a protection against sub-convulsive doses of PTZ. Their protective effects were comparable to that exerted by the standard antiepileptic drug, VPA. The anticonvulsant activity of VPA was further enhanced by its combination with diltiazem. Also, PTZ-kindling reduced pain-threshold as evaluated by hot plate anal- gesimeter and acetic acid-induced writhing test. Although the repeated administration of VPAsignificantly increased pain-threshold in kindled mice, it was not able to normalize it. Similar results were obtained with diltiazem and nifedipine. Interestingly, combina- tionofdiltiazemornifedipinewithVPA elicitedthemostprofoundantinociceptiveeffectinkindledmice. Conclusions: These results demonstrate for the first time the beneficial role of some calcium channel blockers in combination with VPA in the management of acute nociceptive pain. Therapeutically, this enhancing profile for calcium channel blockers fosters asaferandmoreeffectivedrug-combinationregimenthanvalproicacidalone.

Keywords: diltiazem,epilepsy,kindling,nifedipine,nociception,pentylenetetrazole,valproicacid,verapamil

Abbreviations: PTZ – pentylenetetrazole, VPA – valproic acid have been reported to be comorbid with epilepsy, in- cludingcertainpaindisorders[43]. Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional expe- rience that is associated with actual or potential tissue damage. Pain can be classified as acute or chronic Introduction based on the length of time the pain is experienced. Acute pain, resulting from tissue damage, is a normal Epilepsy is one of the most common neurologic disor- physiological response and serves a protective func- ders, with prevalence estimates for active epilepsy tion. Nociceptive pain is typically acute in nature and ranging from 0.2–4.1% [6]. A number of conditions diminishes upon healing, while chronic pain is an ab-

Pharmacological Reports, 2012, 64, 305–314 305 normal sensation usually occurring after direct injury on the anticonvulsant and antinociceptive activities of or damage to a nerve. For individuals experiencing VPA inpentylenetetrazole(PTZ)-kindledmice. chronic pain, their pain usually includes inflammatory and neuropathic pain [45, 58]. Similar pathophysio- logical and biochemical reactions were detected in neuropathic pain syndromes and epilepsy [61]. There- fore, antiepileptic drugs can prove their efficacy in the MaterialsandMethods managementofthiscondition. Most of antiepileptic drugs can reduce neuronal hy- perexcitability by inhibiting ion channels, although Experimentalanimals they may act simultaneously on different parts of the nociceptive pathway [61]. Valproic acid (VPA) is All animal procedures and the experimental protocols widely used in the management of epilepsy, bipolar were approved by the research and ethics committee disorders, social phobias, and neuropathy [29]. VPA of Suez Canal University. Two hundred and twenty causes an increased concentration of natural inhibitor, four male Swiss albino mice (weighing 22–26 g) were GABA, in central nervous system (CNS) synapses obtained from the Egyptian Organization for Biologi- [12] and hence is used for the treatment of chronic in- cal Products and Vaccines (Vacsera, Egypt) and tractable pain [13]. Unluckily, VPA is known to in- housed under controlled conditioning (25 ± 1°C tem- duce several adverse reactions including hemorrhagic perature, 55–65% relative humidity, 12 h dark/light pancreatitis, bone marrow suppression and hepatotox- cycles). After 7 days of acclimatization to laboratory icity [7, 18]. Moreover, VPA toxicity that can seri- conditions, the animals were randomly assigned to ously mount to death has also been reported [48]. experimental groups, 14 mice each. Food and water Therefore, diverse concepts have been adopted to sub- were allowed ad libitum during the study period. All side such VPA’s toxicity, which merely focused on tests were performed between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. lessening it either by enhancing the mitochondrial to minimize circadian influences on seizure suscepti- fatty-acyl transport for its b-oxidation products or bility. combating oxidative stress [34, 47]. On the contrary, little, if any, attempts have targeted enhancing the Chemicalsanddrugs pharmacologic efficacy of VPA so as to reduce its ef- fectivedose,hencealsotoxicity. The following drugs were used in the current study: Calcium ion is a regulator of metabolic pathways nifedipine (Epico Pharmaceutical Industrial Co.), dil- and serves important functions as a second messenger. tiazem and verapamil (Sigma Pharmaceutical Indus- Calcium ion influx occurs by voltage dependent and/or trial Co.). VPA (sodium salt), PTZ and all other -operated calcium channels [32]. A calcium chemicals were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, ion flux into the intracellular space represents the first USA). stage of epileptic neuronal events [10]. The initiation of epileptogenic activity in the neuron is thought to involve the normal phenomenon known as “intrinsic Pharmacologicaltreatments burst firing” that is activated by an inward calcium ion current [16]. It was demonstrated that calcium ion Animals were divided into 16 main groups, 14 mice flux into the pre-synaptic terminal is an important fac- each. All calcium channel blockers (diltiazem, nife- tor for neurotransmission [46]. The blockade of dif- dipine, and verapamil) were suspended in a 1% aque- ferent types of calcium ion channels was proposed as ous solution of Tween 80 and administered intraperi- a possible mechanism of action of VPA [9, 51]. Fur- toneally (ip) at a dose of 20 mg/kg of body weight thermore, epileptic depolarizations of neurons were [40]. Fresh drug solutions were prepared on each day found to be depressed by calcium block- of experimentation and administered with or without ers[23,46]. VPA (200 mg/kg) 30 min before PTZ administration, Accordingly, we aimed in the current study to a time proven to allow peak plasma VPA level to be evaluate the modulatory effects of three calcium reached [24]. The experimental design is summarized channel blockers; diltiazem, nifedipine, or verapamil, inTable1.

306 Pharmacological Reports, 2012, 64, 305–314 Calciumchannelblockersinepilepticnociceptivepain Mona F. El-Azab and Yasser M. Moustafa

Tab.1. Summaryofexperimentaldesign the reaction time of each mouse when placed on a hot plate (Panlab LE 7406, Spain) maintained at 55°C. No. Controlgroups No. Kindledgroups Before the administration of test compounds, the 1 Normal 2 PTZ baseline hot plate latency, defined as licking or jump- ing, of each mouse was determined. After treatment, 3 VPA 4 PTZ+VPA a maximal possible latency of 60 s was allowed, after 5 Diltiazem 6 PTZ+Diltiazem which mice not responding were removed from the 7 Nifedipine 8 PTZ+Nifedipine hot plate surface to avoid tissue damage [33]. For the 9 Verapamil 10 PTZ+Verapamil determination of maximum possible effects, hot plate 11 VPA+Diltiazem 12 PTZ+VPA+Diltiazem test was performed 6 times (at 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 min) post-PTZ injection in the same animals. 13 VPA+Nifedipine 14 PTZ+VPA+Nifedipine The nociceptive thresholds at 120 min were the mini- 15 VPA+Verapamil 16 PTZ+VPA+Verapamil mal in the current study; therefore, the 120 min results wereexpressed. First column shows the control groups corresponding for each kin- dled group. Second column shows kindled groups which received sub-convulsive doses of pentylenetetrazole (PTZ, 35 mg/kg, ip) Aceticacid-inducedwrithing every other day, for a total of 11 injections, either alone or in different combinations with valproic acid (VPA, 200 mg/kg, ip), diltiazem (20 mg/kg, ip), nifedipine (20 mg/kg, ip), or verapamil (20 mg/kg, ip). Two hours after the last dose of PTZ, an acetic acid Treatments with VPA and/or calcium channel blockers were com- menced 30 min before each PTZ injection. At the end of experiment, solution (0.8%; 0.1 ml/10 g body weight) was admin- i.e., after the last dose of PTZ, all groups were divided into 2 sub- istered ip to all subgroups “b”. After a further 10 min, groups, a and b, 7 mice each. These subgroups were used for hot platetestandaceticacid-inducedwrithingtest,respectively the number of constrictions was recorded for another 10min[17].

Statisticalanalysis Kindlinginductionandstaging All data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. Statisti- cal significance was tested by one way analysis of For kindling induction, PTZ was freshly dissolved in variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni post-hoc normal saline and a sub-convulsive dose (35 mg/kg, analysis. The confidence limit of p < 0.05 was consid- ip) was administered every other day, for a total of 11 eredstatisticallysignificant. injections [27]. After each injection of sub-convulsive dose of PTZ, mice in different groups were observed for 30 min and PTZ-induced seizures were evaluated and classified according to the scoring system of Fischer and Kittner [20]: 0 – no evidence of convul- sive activity; 1 – ear and facial twitching, head nodding; Results 2 – myoclonic jerks; 3 – forelimb clonuses, full rear- ing; 4 – generalized clonic convulsions rearing, jump- Kindlingstage ing, falling down, loss of righting reflex; 5 – clonic- tonicconvulsions,tonichindlimbextensions. Repeated treatment with PTZ at a sub-convulsive The mean seizure stages were calculated for all dose, every other day for a total of 11 injections, in- groupsaftereachPTZinjection. duced chemical kindling (Fig. 1). Our data demon- strated that single treatment with the antiepileptic Hotplatemethod drug VPA or any of the calcium channel blockers; dil- tiazem, nifedipine, or verapamil, 30 min before PTZ Hot plate is one of the most commonly used methods injections significantly decreased the kindling stage for the evaluation of antinociceptive drug effect. In compared to PTZ-treated mice. Similar results were the current study, the effect of tested drugs on no- obtained when VPA was administered concurrently ciceptive thresholds was assessed in all subgroups “a” with diltiazem, nifedipine or verapamil, where a sig- using the mouse hot plate analgesimeter by evaluating nificant (p < 0.05) reduction in kindling stage was ob-

Pharmacological Reports, 2012, 64, 305–314 307 Fig. 1. Effects of daily ip administration of 20 mg/kg of diltiazem (upper panel), nifedipine (middle panel), or verapamil (lower panel) either alone or in combi- nation with VPA (VPA, 200 mg/kg), on the development of PTZ-induced kin- dling (35 mg/kg, ip, every other day, for a total of 11 injections) in mice. Mice were scored using Fischer and Kittner seizure stage rating scale. Data are presented as the mean seizure stage ± SEM. All data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post- hoc test; · p £ 0.05 with respect to PTZ, * p £ 0.05 with respect to PTZ + VPA. Eachgroupconsistedof14mice

served in comparison with untreated kindled group. Hotplatetest Unlike nifedipine and verapamil, co-administration of diltiazem with VPA showed significant (p < 0.05) re- Effects of administration of PTZ, valproic acid, or duction in the kindling stage compared to valproic calcium channel blockers on the cut time of the hot acid-treatedkindledgroup(Fig.1). plate test were evaluated in the current study (Fig. 2).

308 Pharmacological Reports, 2012, 64, 305–314 Calciumchannelblockersinepilepticnociceptivepain Mona F. El-Azab and Yasser M. Moustafa

Fig. 2. Effects of daily ip administration of 20 mg/kg of diltiazem (upper panel), nifedipine (middle panel), or verapamil (lower panel) either alone or in combi- nation with VPA (VPA, 200 mg/kg), on the cut time (s) of the hot plate test (55°C) in control as well as PTZ-kind- led (35 mg/kg, ip, every other day, for a total of 11 injections) mice. Values were obtained at 120 min after last PTZ injection and expressed as the mean ± SEM. All data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post- hoc test; · p £ 0.05 with respect to con- # trol, * p £ 0.05 with respect to PTZ, p £ 0.05 with respect to VPA, ° p £ 0.05 with respect to corresponding control. Eachgroupconsistedof7mice

Our results indicated that sub-convulsive doses of administration of VPAwith any of the three calcium chan- PTZ decreased the cut time of the hot plate test sig- nel blockers increased the cut time dramatically compared nificantly (p < 0.05) compared to control group. to control group and restored the cut time to normal level Treatment of control mice with anti-epileptic drug, in kindled groups. It is also observed that combining dilti- valproic acid, or calcium channel blockers, diltiazem azem or nifedipine with VPA significantly (p < 0.05) in- or nifedipine significantly (p < 0.05) increased the cut creased the cut time compared to VPA treated group, the time when compared to control group. On the other effect that was not shown with verapamil. hand, treatment with verapamil, showed no signifi- cant difference from control group. Moreover, ad- Aceticacidwrithingtest ministration of valproic acid, diltiazem or nifedipine to kindled mice significantly (p < 0.05) increased the Effects of administration of PTZ, valproic acid, or cut time compared to PTZ-treated group to restore it calcium channel blockers on the number of writhings to normal level. In contrast, administration of verapa- have been also investigated. Current results indicated mil showed no significant difference from kindled that sub-convulsive doses of PTZ increased the group. Furthermore, the results indicated that co- number of writhings significantly (p < 0.05) in com-

Pharmacological Reports, 2012, 64, 305–314 309 Fig. 3. Effects of daily ip administration of 20 mg/kg of diltiazem (upper panel), nifedipine (middle panel), or verapamil (lower panel) either alone or in combi- nation with VPA (VPA, 200 mg/kg), on the number of writhings induced by acetic acid solution (0.8%; 0.1 ml/ 10 g, ip) in control as well as PTZ- kindled (35 mg/kg, ip, every other day, for a total of 11 injections) mice. Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM. All data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test; · p £ 0.05 with respect to control, * p £ # 0.05 with respect to PTZ, p £ 0.05 with respect to VPA, ° p £ 0.05 with re- ¶ spect to PTZ + VPA, p £ 0.05 with re- spect to corresponding control. Each groupconsistedof7mice

parison with control group. On the other hand, control mice treated with VPA in combination with any of the mice treated with VPA or the calcium channel block- three studied calcium channel blockers showed a sig- ers, diltiazem or nifedipine, but not verapamil, nificantly (p < 0.05) reduced number of writhings showed a significantly (p < 0.05) reduced number of compared to untreated control mice. It is also observed writhings compared to untreated control group. Fur- that combining diltiazem or nifedipine, but not verapa- thermore, treatment of kindled groups with valproic mil, with VPA significantly decreased the number of acid, diltiazem, or nifedipine significantly (p < 0.05) writhings observed in control mice when compared to decreased the number of writhings as compared to valproic acid-treated control group. Comparable results PTZ-treated group to restore it to normal level. Con- were observed in kindled groups treated with the previ- versely, administration of verapamil to kindled mice ous combination where a significant (p < 0.05) de- showed no significant difference from PTZ-treated creased number of writhings was detected as compared group. In addition, the results indicated that control to untreated kindled group (Fig. 3).

310 Pharmacological Reports, 2012, 64, 305–314 Calciumchannelblockersinepilepticnociceptivepain Mona F. El-Azab and Yasser M. Moustafa

Discussion against sub-convulsive doses of PTZ in kindled mice, suggesting their beneficial role in reducing seizure se- verity. Our finding is in contrary with previous study This study describes, for the first time, the enhancing reported by Czuczwar et al. [14], where none of these effect of calcium channel blockers on both the anti- calcium channel blockers showed any protective ef- convulsant and antinociceptive activities of VPA in fect against PTZ-induced convulsions. The use of dif- a PTZ animal convulsion model. Seizures can arise ferent kindling strategies could explain the diverse re- when there is a disruption of mechanisms that nor- sults obtained in both experiments. The protection af- mally create a balance between excitation and inhibi- forded by the three calcium channel blockers was tion. Kindled seizures are widely accepted as an ani- comparable to the standard antiepileptic drug VPA. mal model of temporal lobe epilepsy, wherein re- This finding is consistent with previous findings peated sub-threshold brain stimulation, electrical or which demonstrated that epileptic depolarizations of chemical, leads to behavioral signs of tonic and clonic neurons were found to be depressed by calcium ion seizures [50]. This model of epilepsy has the advan- channel blockers [11, 23, 46, 49]. In addition, co- tages of both an epileptogenic and a spontaneous sei- administration of diltiazem with VPA showed a fur- zure model. Since spontaneity and recurrence of sei- ther significant reduction in kindling stage suggesting zures are the basic features of human epilepsy, that the protective effect of VPA against epileptic sei- chronic models like kindling are advantageous over zuresisenhancedbydiltiazem. acutemodels[4]. Antiepileptic drugs display common antinoci- Valporic acid and its salts, sodium or ceptive and analgesic effects. Perception in general, , are effective antiepileptics with a broad including pain perception, is strongly influenced by spectrum of activity [3], however, there is a discrep- the functional status of the brain [38, 39, 42]. Several ancy in its effect in animal models. A study performed reports indicated that epilepsy patients suffer from by Gasior et al. showed that VPA failed to reduce the different types of pain [8, 15, 19, 60]. However, very sensitivity of kindled mice to the convulsive and le- few reports demonstrated the occurrence of neuro- thal effects of PTZ [21]. Similarly, VPA did not mod- pathic pain in epilepsy patients [43]. Neuropathic ify the course of kindling induced by PTZ in the study pain, whether of peripheral or central origin, is char- carried out by Ilhan et al. [26]. In contrast, the current acterized by a neuronal hyperexcitability in damaged study showed that the administration of VPA induced areas of the nervous system due to a series of molecu- protection against sub-convulsive doses of PTZ in lar changes in the brain, the dorsal horn of the spinal kindled mice. Our results came in parallel with previ- cord, dorsal root ganglia, and the peripheral nocicep- ous studies which indicated that VPA increased PTZ tors [5, 53]. The data obtained in the current study thresholds to different seizure types [24, 37]. The pro- demonstrated that kindling with PTZ significantly in- tective effect of VPA on PTZ-induced kindling is be- tensified the nociceptive effect induced either ther- lieved to be achieved through different neural mecha- mally or chemically. In contrast, Mareš and Rokyta nisms including inhibition of the voltage-dependent have indicated that antinociception occurs following sodium channels, increased concentration of natural in- epileptic tonic-clonic seizures in experimental animal hibitor GABA in CNS synapses, facilitation of GABA- [41]. This discrepancy may be due to using different ergic neurotransmission, reduced N-methyl-D-aspartate experimental design. On the other hand, the anti- (NMDA)-receptor mediated glutamate excitation, in- nociceptive effect of VPA has been indicated in earlier creased serotonergic inhibition and attenuation of studies in animal models and human [36, 57]. Our neurogenicinflammation[12,28,35,36,44,57]. findings came in parallel with previously reported re- Calcium ion plays an important role in the patho- sults where the administration of VPA to control mice genesis of epilepsy. A calcium ion flux into the intra- as well as PTZ-treated mice showed significant anti- cellular space represents the first stage of epileptic nociceptive effect in two experimental models of neuronal events [10] where an increased intracellular pain. The antinociceptive effect of VPA could be ex- calcium level or enhanced calcium conductance can plained based on its previously mentioned neural be observed during epileptic activity [54, 56]. In the mechanisms of action [35, 36, 44]. Similarly, other present study, the calcium channel blockers, dilti- studies have used the hot plate to evaluate the anti- azem, nifedipine or verapamil induced protection nociceptive effect of some antiepileptic drugs or their

Pharmacological Reports, 2012, 64, 305–314 311 derivatives [38, 39, 45]. Our study represents an addi- served up on combined therapy allows for lower tional evidence that antiepileptic agents could be use- doses with definitely less toxic concentrations of VPA fulinthemanagementofacutenociceptivepain. to be therapeutically applied. If the results from this Recently, great progress has been made in under- study could be extrapolated to clinical settings, the standing the cellular targets for anticonvulsant agents. combination of calcium channel blockers with VPA In addition to blocking voltage-gated ion channels in might be beneficial for both epilepsy and pain relief in the CNS (e.g., Ca2+ channels), these agents can affect humans. the same cellular targets in cell bodies of peripheral sensory neurons that convey nociceptive signals to the spinal cord [52]. Several types of calcium channels Acknowledgments: have been shown to be prominently involved in pain TheauthorsthankSigmaPharmaceuticalIndustrialCo.,Egypt,for thegenerousgiftofdiltiazemandverapamil.Nifedipinewaskindly regulation [59]. A recent discovery showed that in- providedbyEpicoPharmaceuticalIndustrialCo.,Egypt. creases in calcium ion promote ischemia-induced neuronal injury [55]. This could explain the anti- nociceptive effect obtained in the current study fol- lowing the administration of calcium channel block- ers, diltiazem or nifedipine, to control mice or PTZ- References: treated mice in writhing test. The observed potentiating effect of concurrent administration of diltiazem or 1. Al-GayyarMM,AbdelsaidMA,MatragoonS,PillaiBA, nifedipine on the antinociception exerted by VPA in El-RemessyAB:Thioredoxininteractingproteinis control mice as well as PTZ-treated mice could be anovelmediatorofretinalinflammationandneurotoxic- explained on the same bases. Our data confirm the ity.BrJPharmacol,2011,164,170–180. 2. Al-HumayydMS:Effectofdiltiazem,nifedipineand previously reported antinociceptive effect of dilti- verapamilontheantinociceptiveactionofacetylsalicylic azem and nifedipine [2, 31]. Verapamil failed to pro- acidinmice.GenPharmacol,1991,22,121–125. duce a similar antinociceptive effect. This could be 3. AleyKO,KulkarniSK:GABAergicagents-induced due to the pharmacodynamic properties of this cal- antinociceptiveeffectinmice.MethodsFindExpClin cium channel antagonist [22, 32]. The observed anti- Pharmacol,1989,11,597–601. 4. AliA,AhmadFJ,PillaiKK,VohoraD:pro- epileptogenic effect of verapamil could be due to its tectsagainstpentylenetetrazole-inducedkindlingin antioxidant and neuroprotective activities [1, 30]. mice.BrJPharmacol,2005,145,880–884. An alternative possibility is that verapamil, a known 5. BackonjaMM:Useoffortreatmentof P-glycoprotein inhibitor [25], acted by facilitating the neuropathicpain.Neurology,2002,59,S14–17. brain penetration of the concurrently administered 6. BanerjeePN,FilippiD,AllenHauserW:Thedescriptive VPA. epidemiologyofepilepsy–areview.EpilepsyRes, 2009,85,31–45. 7. BedryR,ParrotF:Severevalproatepoisoning.Réanima- tion,2004,13,324–333. 8. BellWL,WalczakTS,ShinC,RadtkeRA:Painfulgen- eralisedclonicandtonic-clonicseizureswithretained Conclusions consciousness.JNeurolNeurosurgPsychiatry,1997,63, 792–795. 9. BorowiczKK,CzuczwarSJ:Effectofsomeconvulsants It is concluded from the present study that the calcium ontheprotectiveactivityofloreclezoleanditscombina- channel blockers, diltiazem, nifedipine and verapamil tionswithvalproateorinamygdala-kindled decreased the kindling stage produced by PTZ to rats.PolJPharmacol,2003,55,727–733. 10. CaddickSJ,WangC,FletcherCF,JenkinsNA,Copeland a comparable level of VPA. The antiepileptic drug, NG,HosfordDA:Excitatorybutnotinhibitorysynaptic VPA, as well as diltiazem or nifedipine, but not vera- transmissionisreducedinlethargic(Cacnb4(lh))andtot- pamil, produced antinociception in two mouse models tering(Cacna1atg)mousethalami.JNeurophysiol,1999, of pain. A novel finding of this study is that co- 81,2066–2074. 11. administration of diltiazem or nifedipine with VPA re- CatterallWA,Perez-ReyesE,SnutchTP,StriessnigJ: InternationalUnionofPharmacology.XLVIII.Nomen- tained nociception to normal levels thus indicating the clatureandstructure-functionrelationshipsofvoltage- superiority of combined treatment to individual regi- gatedcalciumchannels.PharmacolRev,2005,57, mens. Further, the enhanced anticonvulsant effect ob- 411–425.

312 Pharmacological Reports, 2012, 64, 305–314 Calciumchannelblockersinepilepticnociceptivepain Mona F. El-Azab and Yasser M. Moustafa

12. ChapmanA,KeanePE,MeldrumBS,SimiandJ, 28. JensenTS:Anticonvulsantsinneuropathicpain:ration- VernieresJC:Mechanismofanticonvulsantactionof aleandclinicalevidence.EurJPain,2002,6,SupplA, valproate.ProgNeurobiol,1982,19,315–359. 61–68. 13. CzuczwarM,KisJ,Œwi¹derM,TurskiWA,Przesmycki 29. JohannessenCU,JohannessenSI:Valproate:past,pres- K:Evaluationofinteractionbetweenvalproateandba- ent,andfuture.CNSDrugRev,2003,9,199–216. clofenintheformalintestinmice.PolJPharmacol, 30. KaloniaH,KumarP,KumarA:Attenuationofproin- 2001,53,51–54. flammatorycytokinesandapoptoticprocessbyverapa- 14. CzuczwarSJ,MalekU,KleinrokZ:Influenceofcalcium milanddiltiazemagainstquinolinicacidinduced channelinhibitorsupontheanticonvulsantefficacyof Huntingtonlikealterationsinrats.BrainRes,2011, commonantiepilepticsagainstpentylenetetrazol-induced 1372,115–126. convulsionsinmice.Neuropharmacology,1990,29, 31. KolevaM,DimovaS:Effectsofnifedipine,verapamil, 943–948. diltiazemandontheantinociceptiveac- 15. D’AlessandroR,SacquegnaT,PazzagliaP,LugaresiE: tivityofacetaminophen.MethodsFindExpClinPhar- Postepilepticandmigraine.JNeurolNeuro- macol,2000,22,741–745. surgPsychiatry,1988,51,596–597. 32. Ku³ak W, Sobaniec W, Wojtal K, Czuczwar SJ: Calcium 16. deFalcoFA,BartiromoU,MajelloL,DiGeronimoG, modulation in epilepsy. Pol J Pharmacol, 2004, 56, 29–41. MundoP:Calciumantagonistinintractable 33. LaughlinTM,TramKV,WilcoxGL,BirnbaumAK: epilepsy.Epilepsia,1992,33,343–345. Comparisonofantiepilepticdrugs,, 17. deSousaDP,deSousaOliveiraF,deAlmeidaRN: andinmousemodelsofacute,prolonged, Evaluationofthecentralactivityofhydroxydihydrocar- andchronicnociception.JPharmacolExpTher,2002, vone.BiolPharmBull,2006,29,811–812. 302,1168–1175. 18. El-MowafyAM,Abdel-DayemMA,Abdel-AzizA, 34. LheureuxPE,HantsonP:Carnitineinthetreatmentof El-AzabMF,SaidSA:Eicosapentaenoicacidablates valproicacid-inducedtoxicity.ClinToxicol(Phila), valproate-inducedliveroxidativestressandcellularde- 2009,47,101–111. rangementwithoutalteringitsclearancerate:dynamic 35. LoscherW:Basicpharmacologyofvalproate:areview synergyandtherapeuticutility.BiochimBiophysActa, after35yearsofclinicaluseforthetreatmentofepi- 2011,1811,460–467. lepsy.CNSDrugs,2002,16,669–694. 19. EschleD,SiegelAM,WieserHG:Epilepsywithsevere 36. LoscherW:Valproate:areappraisalofitspharmacody- abdominalpain.MayoClinProc,2002,77,1358–1360. namicpropertiesandmechanismsofaction.ProgNeuro- 20. FischerW,KittnerH:Influenceofethanolonthe biol,1999,58,31–59. pentylenetetrazol-inducedkindlinginrats.JNeural 37. LoscherW,NauH,MarescauxC,VergnesM:Compara- Transm,1998,105,1129–1142. tiveevaluationofanticonvulsantandtoxicpotenciesof 21. GasiorM,UngardJT,BeekmanM,CarterRB,Witkin valproicacidand2-en-valproicacidindifferentanimal JM:Acuteandchroniceffectsofthesyntheticneuroac- modelsofepilepsy.EurJPharmacol,1984,99,211–218. tive,,againsttheconvulsiveandle- 38. £uszczkiJJ:Dose-responserelationshipanalysisof thaleffectsofpentylenetetrazolinseizure-kindledmice: dosesandtheirantinociceptiveeffectsinhot- comparisonwithandvalproate.Neuropharma- platetestinmice.PharmacolRep,2010,62,942–948. cology,2000,39,1184–1196. 39. £uszczkiJJ,Ko³aczA,WojdaE,CzuczwarM, 22. HamannSR,ToddGD,McAllisterRGJr.:Thepharma- Przesmycki K, Czuczwar SJ: Synergistic interaction of ga- cologyofverapamil.V.Tissuedistributionofverapamil bapentin with tiagabine in the hot-plate test in mice: an iso- andinratanddog.Pharmacology,1983, bolographic analysis. Pharmacol Rep, 2009, 61, 459–467. 27,1–8. 40. £uszczkiJJ,TrojnarMK,TrojnarMP,Kimber-TrojnarZ, 23. HockermanGH,PetersonBZ,JohnsonBD,Catterall SzostakiewiczB,Zadro¿niakA,BorowiczKK, WA:Moleculardeterminantsofdrugbindingandaction CzuczwarSJ:Effectsofthreecalciumchannelantago- onL-typecalciumchannels.AnnuRevPharmacolToxi- nists(,diltiazemandverapamil)onthepro- col,1997,37,361–396. tectiveactionoflamotrigineinthemousemaximal 24. Hoffmann,K,Czapp,M,Loscher,W:Increaseinantie- electroshock-inducedseizuremodel.PharmacolRep, pilepticefficacyduringprolongedtreatmentwithval- 2007,59,672–682. proicacid:roleofinhibitionofhistonedeacetylases? 41. MarešJ,RokytaR:Algesthesiaafterepilepticseizure. EpilepsyRes,2008,81,107–113. PhysiolRes,2009,58,279–285. 25. IannettiP,SpaliceA,ParisiP:Calcium-channelblocker 42. NicholsonB:Gabapentinuseinneuropathicpainsyn- verapamiladministrationinprolongedandrefractory dromes.ActaNeurolScand,2000,101,359–371. statusepilepticus.Epilepsia,2005,46,967–969. 43. OttmanR,LiptonRB,EttingerAB,CramerJA,Reed 26. IlhanA,GurelA,ArmutcuF,KamisliS,IrazM:Antie- ML,MorrisonA,WanGJ:Comorbiditiesofepilepsy: pileptogenicandantioxidanteffectsof Nigellasativa oil resultsfromtheEpilepsyComorbiditiesandHealth againstpentylenetetrazol-inducedkindlinginmice.Neu- (EPIC)survey.Epilepsia,2011,52,308–315. ropharmacology,2005,49,456–464. 44. OwensMJ,NemeroffCB:Pharmacologyofvalproate. 27. InanS,BuyukafsarK:Antiepilepticeffectsoftwo PsychopharmacolBull,2003,37Suppl2,17–24. Rho-kinaseinhibitors,Y-27632and,inmice. 45. Sa³atK,FilipekB,WiêckowskiK,MalawskaB:Analge- BrJPharmacol,2008,155,44–51. sicactivityof3-mono-substitutedderivativesof

Pharmacological Reports, 2012, 64, 305–314 313 dihydrofuran-2-oneinexperimentalrodentmodelsof 53. Tremont-LukatsIW,MegeffC,BackonjaMM:Anticon- pain.PharmacolRep,2009,61,807–818. vulsantsforneuropathicpainsyndromes:mechanismsof 46. SchumacherTB,BeckH,SteinhauserC,SchrammJ, actionandplaceintherapy.Drugs,2000,60,1029–1052. ElgerCE:Effectsof,,andga- 54. TsakiridouE,BertolliniL,deCurtisM,AvanziniG, bapentinoncalciumchannelsinhippocampalgranule PapeHC:SelectiveincreaseinT-typecalciumconduc- cellsfrompatientswithtemporallobeepilepsy.Epilep- tanceofreticularthalamicneuronsinaratmodelofab- sia,1998,39,355–363. senceepilepsy.JNeurosci,1995,15,3110–3117. 55. 47. SimopoulosAP:Essentialfattyacidsinhealthand TwedeVD,MiljanichG,OliveraBM,BulajG:Neuro- protectiveandcardioprotectiveconopeptides:anemerg- chronicdiseases.ForumNutr,2003,56,67–70. ingclassofdrugleads.CurrOpinDrugDiscovDevel, 48. SpillerHA,KrenzelokEP,Klein-SchwartzW,Winter 2009,12,231–239. ML,WeberJA,SolleeDR,BanghSA,GriffithJR:Mul- 56. Vreugdenhil M, Wadman WJ: Enhancement of calcium ticentercaseseriesofvalproicacidingestion:serumcon- currents in rat hippocampal CA1 neurons induced by kin- centrationsandtoxicity.JToxicolClinToxicol,2000, dling epileptogenesis. Neuroscience, 1992, 49, 373–381. 38,755–760. 57. WinklerI,BlotnikS,ShimshoniJ,YagenB,DevorM, 49. SwiaderM,BorowiczKK,PorebiakJ,KleinrokZ, BialerM:Efficacyofantiepilepticisomersofvalproic CzuczwarSJ:Influenceofagentsaffectingvoltage- acidandinaratmodelofneuropathicpain. dependentcalciumchannelsanddantroleneontheanti- BrJPharmacol,2005,146,198–208. convulsantactionoftheAMPA/kainatereceptorantago- 58. WoolfCJ,MannionRJ:Neuropathicpain:aetiology, nistLY 300164inmice.EurNeuropsychopharmacol, symptoms,mechanisms,andmanagement.Lancet,1999, 2002,12,311–319. 353,1959–1964. 50. SzyndlerJ,PiechalA,Blecharz-KlinK,SkórzewskaA, 59. YakshTL:Calciumchannelsastherapeutictargetsin MaciejakP,WalkowiakJ,TurzyñskaDetal.:Effectof neuropathicpain.JPain,2006,7,S13–30. kindledseizuresonratbehaviorinwaterMorrismaze 60. YazawaS,IkedaA,SawamotoN,TeradaK,Fukuyama testandaminoacidconcentrationsinbrainstructures. H,TanakaM,ShibasakiH:Painfulfocalsensoryseizure PharmacolRep,2006,58,75–82. arisingfromtheprimarysomatosensorycortex.Intern 51. TodorovicSM,LingleCJ:Pharmacologicalpropertiesof Med,2003,42,875–879. 61. T-typeCa2+ currentinadultratsensoryneurons:effects ZarembaPD,Bia³ekM,B³aszczykB,CioczekP, ofanticonvulsantandanestheticagents.JNeurophysiol, CzuczwarSJ:Non-epilepsyusesofantiepilepsydrugs. 1998,79,240–252. PharmacolRep,2006,58,1–12. 52. TodorovicSM,RastogiAJ,Jevtovic-TodorovicV:Potent analgesiceffectsofanticonvulsantsonperipheralther- malnociceptioninrats.BrJPharmacol,2003,140, Received: May17,2011; intherevisedform: October1,2011; 255–260. accepted: November21,2011.

314 Pharmacological Reports, 2012, 64, 305–314