DOCSLIB.ORG

The Chapter Model Project Teams

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FWD.us CHAPTER TEAM MANUAL second edition CHAPTER TEAM MANUAL Table of Contents THANK YOU FOREWORD OUR MISSION PART 1: YOUR CHAPTER THE CHAPTER MODEL PROJECT TEAMS PART 2: YOUR CHALLENGE DEMOCRACY PROJECT 2.0 PROJECT CO-FOUNDERS PROJECT PART 3: YOUR FWDMONTHLY APPENDIX BEFORE WE BEGIN That’s not fair, and it isn’t a recipe for collective prosperity. We can do better. Thank you Sometimes we can expand opportunity just by getting out of people’s way, We were founded in April like removing the legal obstacles that 2013 by leaders of the tech prevent talented immigrants from fully contributing to our communities. But community to give our values ensuring fair chances and collective a voice in politics. We are a prosperity requires more. The best tech companies invest in their employees, community of dreamers and cultivate their talents, and construct doers, idealists and engineers. environments that encourage creativity We imagine new possibilities, and collaboration. We need public policies that provide the same support for every and then make them real. At our person in this country. And we need best, we make the world a better policies that produce the innovation and place for millions of people. infrastructure that will enable everyone to put their abilities into action. Achieving these ambitious aims would be every person should have the opportunity hard work even in the best of times, but to contribute. It doesn’t matter where a it’s made even tougher by our democracy’s person comes from or who their parents current dysfunctions. To achieve better are. What counts are creativity, talent, policies we need to build a better and the willingness to work hard. political system—one that can rise above These values are important to us gridlock and embrace bold new ideas. because human ability provides the We know that politics isn’t pretty. At foundation for everything we do. But times, it can be tempting to opt out. But they‘re not just “tech” values, they’re disengagement is not an option, not if American values. We’re lucky to live we’re serious about building a better world. in a country that believes everyone should have a fair shot to succeed. We strive to create a potent new political movement. Through local Chapters and Yet despite this core commitment, many Americans face a future of to engage in innovative advocacy that diminished opportunities. Mobility is stagnant, inequality soaring, and growth the terms of public debate. It’s going to feeble. Our schools are in disarray, our be challenging. But that’s never stopped infrastructure in disrepair. Our middle us before. Every day we bring incredible class, once robust, is shrinking. ingenuity and passion to our work; it’s time Our community needs to reckon with to bring that same spirit to our democracy. these challenges. The new knowledge economy is a source of both dynamism and dislocation, innovation as well as inequality. Not enough people ThankThe FWD.us Team You are getting the chance to contribute. FOREWORD WHY IMMIGRATION Our Mission REFORM NOW FWD.us is an organization for today’s world; it hinders the U.S. in a global economy and fails to live up started by key leaders in the to our American ideals. Reforming our tech and entrepreneurial broken system is critically important to community to engage the economic growth, creating American jobs, and ensuring the U.S.’s continued tech community to advocate competitiveness. This is an urgent for policies that will make the national issue, we have a once in a generation opportunity to get it right, American dream achievable in and it needs to get done right now. the 21st century economy. How do we do that? Immigration OUR ADVOCACY reform, improving the quality of The tech community can be a positive science and technology education, force in American politics. We have built and encouraging more investment in a talented, bipartisan organization and breakthrough technologies in a manner the infrastructure to enable tech to make an impact on the important issue of immigration reform, and others to come. WHAT WE BELIEVE The global economy is changing, grassroots organizing in targeted districts, online advocacy campaigns, concentrated changes to remain competitive. We paid media in targeted districts, and a are working to encourage Congress focus on earned media. As members of to pass policies that maximize the the tech community, we care deeply about potential of our country’s workforce to build the knowledge economy. immigration system so that we do right by our economy and American families. OUR TEAM CO-CHAIRS San Francisco: Brian Goldsmith, James broad array of entrepreneurs and tech Hong, Rick Marini, Hemant Taneja, Greg leaders, our team consists of a bipartisan Tseng, Josh Wiseman, Tali Rapaport Silicon Valley: Tom Baruch, Trevor levels of government and campaigns at Cornwell, Alex Rampell, Brett Rochkind, all points along the political spectrum. Yun-Fang Juan, Mike McCue, Nima Asharbeygi, Babak Pahlavan FOUNDERS New York City: James Robinson, Rony Zarom, David Kidder Aditya Agarwal, Jim Breyer, Matt Miami: Anton Diego, Seth Cassel Cohler, Ron Conway, John Doerr, Los Angeles: Seth Berman Drew Houston, Chamath Palihapitiya, Sanghvi, Mark Zuckerberg. MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS Tim Armstrong, Steve Ballmer, Juan Calle, Steve Chen, Brian Chesky, Chris Cox, Barry Diller, Stanley F. Druckenmiller, John Fisher, Paul Graham, Reed Hastings, Chad Hurley, Josh James, Dick Kramlich, Peter Kellner, Max Levchin, Joe Lonsdale, Andrew Mason, Marissa Mayer, Mary Meeker, Dave Morin, Jon Oringer, Hadi Partovi, Greg Penner, Alison Pincus, Mark Pincus, Keith Rabois, Hosain Rahman, Eric Schmidt, Darian Shirazi, Brad Smith, Kevin Systrom, Padmasree Warrior, Fred Wilson PART ONE: YOUR CHAPTER We bring together passionate, talented engage in innovative advocacy that The Chapter Model educates elected decision makers and changes the terms of public debate. FWD.us Chapters are the central home for everything Each Chapter* is overseen by Regional that we do—building networks, Co-Chairs, Ambassadors, and members. innovating advocacy, and sharing stories. Chapter Locations San Francisco, Silicon Valley, Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston, *Philadelphia, Austin, New York City. * CO- CHAIRS ORGANIZERS AMBASSADORS MEMBER PROJECTS DEMOCRACY 2.0 CO-FOUNDERS CO-CHAIRS AMBASSADORS ORGANIZERS Ambassadors are volunteer Regional Organizers contributors and leaders who work closely provide FWD.us resources and training to all Chapter local leadership and serve FWD.us Chapters. They members in order to as featured speakers focus internally on the maintain active local at FWDMonthly. health of the Chapter Chapters and successful and support each of our project teams. membership projects. DIRECT ADVOCACY resources and guidance to fuel Project Teams advocacy and engagement. The backbone of the local FWD. Members, part of at least one project us Chapter is its membership. team, meet once a month with their local Chapter at FWDMonthly* Our membership program brings together dedicated supporters in a political FWDMonthly Afterwards, you will break FWDMonthly is our local Chapter challenges. From devising meeting held once a month to explore innovative ways to connect the intersection of tech and politics constituents to Congress, to and engage in advocacy—both in amplifying compelling local *doing and in innovating how it’s done. Guest speakers will share their be critical to our success. expertise on the month’s issue. DEMOCRACY 2.0 CO-FOUNDERS PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT A team of innovators A team of problem A team of donors and focused on developing new solvers and strategists volunteers who organize and creative strategies who want to use their discussions on tech and to engage with elected specialized skills to shape politics at quarterly decision makers. the national narrative on ThinkFWD events. critical political issues. PART TWO: PROJECT TEAMS Each member can join one of three Project Your Challenge Project, and the Co-Founders Project. We see our job as identifying and analyzing problems that stand Every chapter members is also encouraged to sign up for our Rapid Response team in the way of progress. From who will be ready to act when a political there, our goal is to empower development requires a fast response. you to solve important political DEMOCRACY PROJECT challenges using your creativity, The mission of the passion, and skills. That means Democracy Project is to the Ambassadors in your city will create and implement more present your project team with a elected decision-makers. challenge at each FWDMonthly. These will be big-picture obstacles that 2.0 PROJECT give you the opportunity to advance The mission of the 2.0 Project immigration reform and change the is to use tech’s specialized politics-as-usual of Washington, D.C. skillset to shape public perception on today’s most After that, it’s completely up to you. At important political issues. each FWDMonthly, your team will decide what you would like to do that month to tackle your challenge. You are welcome CO-FOUNDERS PROJECT to dream big or think small depending The mission of the Co- upon your availability, and to use any and Founders Project is to all resources and skills at your disposal facilitate discussion to develop innovative solutions. at the intersection of technology and politics. Everyone who comes to FWDMonthly is a member of FWD. But we don’t want FWD to just be another card in your wallet, or a check you send each year. The way this chapter will work is every month you will break out into your respective team and we Rapid Response Team This is politics. Things Our goal is to empower the sharpest change quickly and suddenly. minds in tech, design and business to We are assembling a rapid advocate for some of the toughest public response team to be ready to go when policy challenges of our generation.
Recommended publications
  • Filed by Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. II Pursuant To

    Filed by Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. II Pursuant To

    Filed by Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. II Pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act of 1933 and deemed filed pursuant to Rule 14a-12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Subject Company: Opendoor Commission File No. 001-39253 Chamath Palihapitiya, CEO and Founder, Social Capital Hedosophia II CNBC Squawk Box Interview Transcript September 15, 2020 ANDREW ROSS SORKIN: Good morning and welcome back to Squawk Box, I’m Andrew Ross Sorkin along with Joe Kernen, Becky is off today. This hour, we're going to strain the broadband and try something we haven’t done in months, we’re going to bring in a guest host for the entire hour. There’s no better person for that than Chamanth Palihapitiya, the Founder and CEO of Social Capital. He’s also the chairman of Virgin Galactic and Co-owner of the NBA’s Golden State Warriors, and recently he’s been very active in the realm of SPACs, special purpose acquisition companies, and this morning he has some breaking news on this very topic. We’re thrilled to have you here Chamanth, and no less you’re breaking news on the air. I’ll let you take it away, what’s the news? CHAMATH PALIHAPITIYA: Andrew, well, thanks for letting me do this with you guys. The news is that IPOB is merging with Opendoor, and Opendoor will be going public. This is the largest online consumer real estate business in the United States. It's doing something really incredible and what I wanted to do was take an opportunity to give the viewers a sort of behind-the-scenes look at how we decided to do this investment.
  • Public Comments October 30 to November 12, 2013

    Public Comments October 30 to November 12, 2013

    Public Comments October 30 to November 12, 2013 From: Ron Conway Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 3:03 PM To: Nancy Bechtle Subject: Join me in supporting the Lucas Cultural Arts Museum in the Presidio in SF To the Board of the Presidio Trust: As you know, I have a passion for making and keeping San Francisco at the forefront of innovation. Through sf.citi, the nonprofit organization I founded to help promote San Francisco as the country’s 21st century capital of technology and forward thinking, I watch every day the work of countless artists, technicians and talented people that keep this city at the top of its game. I believe that the Lucas Cultural Arts Museum is the perfect addition to San Francisco’s cityscape: not only an attraction that will generate interest in and support for the Presidio (not to mention millions of dollars each year in revenue for the Presidio through land rents) but specifically as a beacon that says to the world that San Francisco is, and will remain, this country’s capital of innovation. Certainly, there is no greater innovator around than George Lucas. His films and his vision have transformed cinema. His businesses have transformed the tech sector, specifically digital technology. And, his passion for education has resulted in a world-class collection of art (still growing) that is second to none. San Francisco deserves this museum. It demands it. I, along with those listed below, are supporting this museum not because of George Lucas, but rather because of the promise it represents.
  • Cecilia Diaz Critical/Cultural Methods Dr. Bob Bednar 4/8//21

    Cecilia Diaz Critical/Cultural Methods Dr. Bob Bednar 4/8//21

    Cecilia Diaz Critical/Cultural Methods Dr. Bob Bednar 4/8//21 Research Project Draft Protests in the name of social reform have recently undergone drastic transformations in how they are founded and manifested. The ascension of social media use in the early 2000s gave rise to streamlined instant communication between people that otherwise may have never communicated organically. History has proven that we gather together in times of hardship and join forces when those hardships necessitate change and reform. The internet eliminates the practical issue of distance and facilitates the possibility of an infinite number of formed communities. In the case of protest, it facilitates the ability to organize and gather to demand social and political change. Sebastián Valenzuela suggests that one explanation for use of social networks and political protest may be online expression as a foundation for action. It is stated, “In addition to cognitive preparation, the expression of opinions can be facilitators of political protest” (Valenzuela, 2014). Research has shown that when individuals talk about political subjects publicly, they are more likely to mobilize and engage in political activities. The expression “allows people to face their ideas, make arguments, and reflect on the information obtained” (Schmitt-Beck, 2008). Platforms like Twitter and Facebook have acted as multiplexes for the expression of political views and serve as the foundation for many modern protests such as the Black Lives Matter movement, #MeToo, Arab Spring, and the Sunflower Student Movement. The protest this study will focus on is unique in that it was not founded as a politically driven protest but became one, or perhaps more accurately, was received as one as it gained popularity in mainstream media publics.
  • The-Growth-Handbook.Pdf

    The-Growth-Handbook.Pdf

    Authoritative, actionable strategies on how to grow your business. Intercom builds a suite of messaging-first products that all modern internet businesses can use to accelerate growth across the customer lifecycle, from acquisition to engagement and support. www.intercom.com We also regularly share our thoughts on growth, marketing, sales, startups and the business of software. blog.intercom.com Executive Editors: Adam Risman and Geoffrey Keating Copy Editor: Karen Ostergren Book Design: Judson Collier and Kelly Carpenter Art Direction: Justin Pervorse © 2018 Intercom Inc. ISBN: 978-0-9861392-9-1 We’ll spare you the legal mumbo jumbo. But please don’t share this book or rip off any content or imagery in it without giving us appropriate credit and a link. Got questions? Drop us a note at [email protected]. 06 21 31 48 57 69 Chamath Palihapitiya, Founder and CEO, Social Capital and Facebook’s first VP of Growth When asked, I often tell people that the key to seem smart. Great things are simple. We had a very understanding growth is two things: simple framework for growth – acquisition, activation, engagement, virality. Having this framework allowed 1. A fundamental understanding of your product and, us to prioritize our work, design experiments, build specifically, what the key reasons people use it are. products and so on. It also allowed everyone to It’s easy to be confused about what true value looks like understand it and see how decisions were made in a and, as a byproduct, conflate causation and correlation: logical, transparent way. motivations and root causes versus byproducts and outcomes.
  • Ronald Conway and Family - Committee Summary Based on Data Exported from the Ethics Commission Campaign Finance Database - 1/1/2010 Through 10/28/2012

    Ronald Conway and Family - Committee Summary Based on Data Exported from the Ethics Commission Campaign Finance Database - 1/1/2010 Through 10/28/2012

    Ronald Conway and Family - Committee Summary Based on data exported from the Ethics Commission Campaign Finance Database - 1/1/2010 through 10/28/2012 Filer/Committee Total Amount SAN FRANCISCANS FOR FAIR TAXES AND BETTER CITY SERVICES, YES ON E, A $275,000.00 BROAD COALITION OF SMALL BUSINESSES, LABOR UNIONS, AND TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES San Franciscans for Jobs and Good Government, Supporting Ed Lee for Mayor $105,693.62 2011 YES ON B, SAN FRANCISCANS FOR CLEAN AND SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, $100,100.00 WITH MAJOR SUPPORT FROM SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE, RON CONWAY AND THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND SAN FRANCISCO WOMEN FOR ACCOUNTABILITY AND A RESPONSIBLE $69,000.00 SUPERVISOR OPPOSING CHRISTINA OLAGUE 2012 Coalition For Civil Sidewalks $65,000.00 San Francisco Alliance For Jobs and Sustainable Growth PAC $60,000.00 Mayor Ed Lee for San Francisco Committee $49,000.00 Cunnie for Sheriff 2011 sponsored by the San Franc $35,000.00 Coalition for Sustainable Housing, A Committee in Support of Proposition C $25,000.00 San Franciscans United for Pension and Health Reform, Yes on C, No on D, a $25,000.00 coalition of public employees, taxpayers and business groups SAVE HETCH HETCHY, NO ON F, A COALITION OF BUSINESS, LABOR AND $25,000.00 TAXPAYERS, WITH MAJOR FUNDING BY THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION, DIGNITY HEALTH, AND THE BAY AREA COUNCIL Why Tuesday San Francisco $25,000.00 San Francisco Parent Political Action Committee $20,000.00 A New San Francisco Majority in Support of the Democratic County Central $15,000.00 Committee 2012 * YES ON PROPOSITION B, supported by Public Defender Jeff Adachi, author $15,000.00 Harriet Heyman, business investors Michael Moritz & Warren Hellman, Basic American Goods executives…(Complete Name See Form 410) San Franciscans For A Better Muni, A Coalition Of Muni Riders, Concerned $10,000.00 Citizens, And Supervisor Sean R.
  • Open Internet Investors Letter the Honorable Tom Wheeler, Chairman Federal Communications Commission 445 12Th Street

    Open Internet Investors Letter the Honorable Tom Wheeler, Chairman Federal Communications Commission 445 12Th Street

    7/2/2014 Open Internet Investors Letter Open Internet Investors Letter The Honorable Tom Wheeler, Chairman Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington D.C. 20554 May 8, 2014 Dear Chairman Wheeler: We write to express our support for a free and open Internet. We invest in entrepreneurs, investing our own funds and those of our investors (who are individuals, pension funds, endowments, and financial institutions). We often invest at the earliest stages, when companies include just a handful of founders with largely unproven ideas. But, without lawyers, large teams or major revenues, these small startups have had the opportunity to experiment, adapt, and grow, thanks to equal access to the global market. As a result, some of the startups we have invested in have managed to become among the most admired, successful, and influential companies in the world. We have made our investment decisions based on the certainty of a level playing field and of assurances against discrimination and access fees from Internet access providers. Indeed, our investment decisions in Internet companies are dependent upon the certainty of an equal­ opportunity marketplace. Based on news reports and your own statements, we are worried that your proposed rules will not provide the necessary certainty that we need to make investment decisions and that these rules will stifle innovation in the Internet sector. If established companies are able to pay for better access speeds or lower latency, the Internet will no longer be a level playing field. Start­ups with applications that are advantaged by speed (such as games, video, or payment systems) will be unlikely to overcome that deficit no matter how innovative their service.
  • Bad Actors: Authenticity, Inauthenticity, Speech, and Capitalism

    Bad Actors: Authenticity, Inauthenticity, Speech, and Capitalism

    ARTICLES BAD ACTORS: AUTHENTICITY, INAUTHENTICITY, SPEECH, AND CAPITALISM Sarah C. Haan* ABSTRACT “Authenticity” has evolved into an important value that guides social media companies’ regulation of online speech. It is enforced through rules and practices that include real-name policies, Terms of Service requiring users to present only accurate information about themselves, community guidelines that prohibit “coordinated inauthentic behavior,” verification practices, product features, and more. This Article critically examines authenticity regulation by the social media industry, including companies’ claims that authenticity is a moral virtue, an expressive value, and a pragmatic necessity for online communication. It explains how authenticity regulation provides economic value to companies engaged in “information capitalism,” “data capitalism,” and “surveillance capitalism.” It also explores how companies’ self-regulatory focus on authenticity shapes users’ views about objectionable speech, upends traditional commitments to pseudonymous political expression, and encourages collaboration between the State and private companies. The Article concludes that “authenticity,” as conceptualized by the industry, is not an important value for users on par with privacy or dignity, but that it offers business value to companies. Authenticity regulation also provides many of the same opportunities for viewpoint discrimination as does garden-variety content moderation. * Associate Professor of Law, Washington and Lee University School of Law. The Author thanks Carliss Chatman, Rebecca Green, Margaret Hu, Lyman Johnson, Thomas Kadri, James Nelson, Elizabeth Pollman, Carla L. Reyes, Christopher B. Seaman, Micah Schwartzman, Morgan Weiland, participants in the W&L Law 2019 Big Data Research Colloquium, and participants in the 2019 Yale Freedom of Expression Scholars Conference (“FESC VII”), for their insightful comments on early drafts of this Article.
  • FROM EDITORS to ALGORITHMS a Values-Based Approach to Understanding Story Selection in the Facebook News Feed

    FROM EDITORS to ALGORITHMS a Values-Based Approach to Understanding Story Selection in the Facebook News Feed

    Running head: DEVITO / FROM EDITORS TO ALGORITHMS 1 FROM EDITORS TO ALGORITHMS A Values-Based Approach to Understanding Story Selection in the Facebook News Feed Michael A. DeVito Department of Communication Studies Northwestern University Evanston, IL, USA [email protected] http://www.mikedevito.net/ This is a pre-print version of an article published that has been accepted for publication in Digital Journalism. For quotation, please consult the final, published version of the article at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1178592. Please cite as: DeVito, M. A. (2016) From Editors to Algorithms: A values-based approach to understanding story selection in the Facebook news feed. Digital Journalism Ahead of print. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2016.1178592 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author thanks Eileen Emerson for her research assistance, as well as Kerric Harvey, David Karpf, and Emily Thorson of The George Washington University for their guidance and support during the initial research on this piece. The author also thanks the anonymous reviewers, William Marler, and the members of Aaron Shaw’s “Bring Your Own Research” group at Northwestern University for their feedback on the manuscript. FUNDING This research was partially supported by a thesis grant from The George Washington University’s School of Media and Public Affairs, with which the author was previously affiliated. DEVITO / FROM EDITORS TO ALGORITHMS (PRE-PRINT) 2 FROM EDITORS TO ALGORITHMS A Values-Based Approach to Understanding Story Selection in the Facebook News Feed Facebook’s News Feed is an emerging, influential force in our personal information flows, especially where news information is concerned.
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C

    UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C

    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A (Rule 14a-101) INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. ) Filed by the Registrant x Filed by a party other than the Registrant o Check the appropriate box: o Preliminary Proxy Statement o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) x Definitive Proxy Statement o Definitive Additional Materials o Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12 Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. (Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): x No fee required. o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: (5) Total fee paid: o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
  • Digital Garage Invests in SV Angel to Strengthen Its Silicon Valley Investment Portfolio

    Digital Garage Invests in SV Angel to Strengthen Its Silicon Valley Investment Portfolio

    30 June 2011 Digital Garage, Inc. Digital Garage Invests in SV Angel To Strengthen Its Silicon Valley Investment Portfolio Digital Garage, Inc. (JASDAQ: 4819, Head Office: Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, Japan, President & Group CEO: Kaoru Hayashi, henceforth DG), through its investments and new business development subsidiary DG Incubation, Inc. (Head Office: Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, Japan, President: Yasuyuki Rokuyata, henceforth DGI) made an investment in ‘SV Angel III’, a venture fund with a prominent Silicon Valley investor Ron Conway as its primary strategic advisor. SV Angel, founded by Ron Conway and David Lee, is a fund focusing mainly on providing mentoring to the early-stage startup companies. With recognized for the early-backing of Google, PayPal and Twitter, hugely successful Silicon Valley investor and entrepreneur Ron Conway, it puts priority on funding and business development of social media and mobile technology services. The fund’s investments portfolio companies include: about.me (http://about.me/, acquired by AOL), Bump Technologies (http://bu.mp/, acquired), Flipboard (http://flipboard.com/), Milo (http://milo.com/, acquired by eBay) and Path (http://www.path.com/) among others. Furthermore, there are a number of common items on Ron Conway’s and DGI’s portfolio, such as Twitter, Path, Three SF (acquired by Electric Arts), Fotonauts (http://fotopedia.com/) and Context Logic (http://contextlogic.com). Partnership with SV Angel provides DGI with ample opportunities for indirect investments in the Silicon Valley and San Francisco based promising startup ventures. This newly-earned access to the talented young entrepreneurs is expected to introduce considerable stabilization of DGI’s investments portfolio. This is especially because through strengthening of ties with the fund’s network of angel investors and entrepreneurs, DGI gains first-hand information on the industry’s newest trends.
  • Filed by Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. III Pursuant to Rule

    Filed by Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. III Pursuant to Rule

    Filed by Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. III Pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act of 1933 and deemed filed pursuant to Rule 14a-12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Subject Company: Clover Health Investments, Corp. Commission File No. 001-39252 Clover Health - SCH Merger Announcement: Full CNBC Squawk Box Transcript Squawk Box – Interview with Chamath Palihapitiya and Vivek Garipalli CNBC October 6, 2020 Clip 1 Clip 2 ANDREW ROSS SORKIN: Welcome back to Squawk. This morning, Chamath Palihapitiya unveiling his next SPAC target, healthcare startup Clover Health and Chamath is back with us to explain why. Chamath, make the argument. CHAMATH PALIHAPITIYA, CEO, SOCIAL CAPITAL: Well, Andrew, let's just take a step back. You know, when the pandemic started, I, like a lot of Americans, just felt enormous anxiety, and what I tried to do was do the best I could to learn as much about the healthcare system and the pandemic specifically. And it was very hard for me. You know, I’m trying to navigate an understand of testing, understanding medicines, understanding a course of care if I were to get the disease, what I would do, and I was left with just a lot of confusion. And so, I took a step back, and I wanted to actually understand the state of healthcare more broadly. And what I found was really disturbing. Since 1970, what we have done as Americans is we have now, on a per capita basis, increased healthcare spending by 31 times, meaning for every dollar we spent in 1970, we now spend $31.
  • Founder Mark Zuckerberg, Eduardo Saverin, Dustin Moskovitz, Chris Hughes

    Founder Mark Zuckerberg, Eduardo Saverin, Dustin Moskovitz, Chris Hughes

    Facebook Facebook, Inc. Type Private Founded Cambridge, Massachusetts[1] (2004) Founder Mark Zuckerberg, Eduardo Saverin, Dustin Moskovitz, Chris Hughes Headquarters Palo Alto, California, U.S., will be moved to Menlo Park, California, U.S. in June 2011 Area served Worldwide Mark Zuckerberg (CEO), Chris Cox (VP of Product), Sheryl Sandberg (COO), Donald E. Key people Graham (Chairman) Net income N/A Website facebook.com Type of site Social network service Registration Required Users 600 million[5][6] (active in January 2011) Launched February 4, 2004 Current status Active Facebook (stylized facebook) is a social network service and website launched in February 2004, operated and privately owned by Facebook, Inc. As of January 2011, Facebook has more than 600 million active users. Users may create a personal profile, add other users as friends, and exchange messages, including automatic notifications when they update their profile. Additionally, users may join common interest user groups, organized by workplace, school, or college, or other characteristics. The name of the service stems from the colloquial name for the book given to students at the start of the academic year by university administrations in the USA to help students get to know each other better. Facebook allows anyone who declares themselves to be at least 13 years old to become a registered user of the website. Facebook was founded by Mark Zuckerberg with his college roommates and fellow computer science students Eduardo Saverin, Dustin Moskovitz and Chris Hughes. The website's membership was initially limited by the founders to Harvard students, but was expanded to other colleges in the Boston area, the Ivy League, and Stanford University.