DOCSLIB.ORG

Lawquadranglenotes 0 Lawquadranglenotes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN L NON-PROFIT LAW SCHOOL ORGANIZATION Q B38 HUTCHINS HALL U.S. POSTAGE PAID N ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN ANN ARBOR, MI PERMIT #144 48109-1215 5 LAWQUADRANGLENOTES 0 LAWQUADRANGLENOTES . 2 50.2 • SUMMER • 2008 0 Jeffrey Fisher, ’97: Approaching the nation’s highest bench Michigan Law launches facilities expansion project S Federalist Society holds national student conference at Michigan Law U M Judging alumni by their book covers M Looking again at the Geneva Conventions E R 2 0 0 8 The University of Michigan Law School Volume 50, Number 2 SUMMER 2008 On the cover: Jeffrey L. Fisher, ’97, answers reporters’ If you are a Law School graduate, questions about his appearance before the U.S. Supreme please send your change of address to: EVENTS CALENDAR Court last winter to argue for damages for victims of the Exxon-Valdez oil spill in 1989. Law School Development and Alumni Relations (Photo by Tim Sloan/AFP/Getty Image). 109 East Madison July 26 – August 2 ..................National Bar Association Annual Meeting, Houston Copyright © 2008 Suite 3000 The Regents of the University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, MI 48104-2973 All rights reserved. Phone: 734.615.4500 August 7 – 12 ..........................American Bar Association Annual Meeting, New York City Law Quadrangle Notes (USPA #144) is issued by the Fax: 734.615.4539 University of Michigan Law School. Postage paid at E-mail: [email protected] September 25 – 26 .................Conference – An Environmental Agenda for the Next Administration Ann Arbor, Michigan. Publication office: Law Quadrangle Notes, University of Michigan (Environmental Law and Policy Program) Law School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215. Non-alumni readers and others should address: Published two times a year. September 26 – 28 .................Reunion of the classes of 1953, ’58, ’63, ’68, ’73, and ’78 Postmaster, send address changes to: Editor Editor, Law Quadrangle Notes Law Quadrangle Notes October 3 – 5 ..........................Reunion of the classes of 1983, ’88, ’93, ’98, and ’03 University of Michigan Law School B38 Hutchins Hall B38 Hutchins Hall Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215 Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215 October 24 ..............................Conference – Happy, Healthy Lawyers Fax: 734.615.4277 (Office of Career Services, Washtenaw County Chapter of Women E-mail: For Class Notes – [email protected] Lawyers Association of Michigan) Editor/Writer: Tom Rogers For other communications: [email protected] Writers: Shannon Cook; Becky Freligh; John P. Masson; Jeff Mortimer; Richard W. Pogue, ’53; November 7 – 8 ......................Symposium – Law and Economics of Drug Development Mathias Reimann, LL.M. ’83 Director of Publications: Lisa Mitchell-Yellin www.law.umich.edu November 14 – 15 ..................Building On Campaign Finale, Ann Arbor Art Director: Laura Jarvis Design: Dennis Liske, Phoenix Press Inc., Laura Jarvis December 19 ..........................Senior Day Photo credits: Peter Aaron/Esto, Washington University; Bryan Becker, Duke University and UVA Special Collections; Jay Dotson, University of Washington; Gregory Fox This calendar is correct at deadline time, but is subject to change. Photography; Sam Hollenshead Photography; For the most recent calendar information, go to www.law.umich.edu. Michael Johnson, Stanford University; John P. Masson; Tim Sloan/AFP/Getty Images; University Photo Services (Scott Galvin, Lin Jones) The University of Michigan, as an equal opportunity/ affirmative action employer, complies with all applicable federal and state laws regarding nondiscrimination and affirmative action, including Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The University of Michigan is committed to a policy of nondiscrimination and equal opportunity for all persons regardless of race, sex, color, religion, creed, national origin or ancestry, age, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, disability, or Vietnam-era veteran status in employment, educational programs and activities, and admissions. Inquiries or complaints may be addressed to the Senior Director for Institutional Equity and Title IX/Section 504 Coordinator, Office of Institutional Equity, 2072 Administrative Services Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1432, 734.763.0235, TTY 734.647.1388. For other University of Michigan information call 734.764.1817. The Regents of the University of Michigan Julia Donovan Darlow, Ann Arbor Laurence B. Deitch, Bingham Farms Olivia P. Maynard, Goodrich Rebecca McGowan, Ann Arbor Andrea Fischer Newman, Ann Arbor Andrew C. Richner, Grosse Pointe Park S. Martin Taylor, Grosse Pointe Farms Katherine E. White, Ann Arbor Mary Sue Coleman (ex officio) [ o p e n i n g ] Global Leadership in Law Michigan Law has been in the forefront of legal education since its founding in 1859. That means we’ve got much to celebrate when we kick off our sesquicentennial celebration in January 2009 with journeys through our history and forays into our future. You can enter the wonderful world of our celebration through the “History and Traditions” web page. www.law.umich.edu/historyandtraditions We’ll be adding to it regularly so we invite you to come back often. 1859 • 2009 Global Leadership in Law LQN SUMMER 2008 1 A message from Dean Caminker 1933. That was the year the University of Michigan and its Law School completed the most iconic and dramatic academic complex on campus, and among the most impressive on any campus in this country, for that matter. The Law Quadrangle’s distinctive architectural style immediately epitomized Michigan Law’s academic rigor and special sense of community. This remarkable collection of buildings has been a source of great pride for generations of Michigan students, faculty, and alumni. We smile when visitors catch their breath upon entering the Reading Room, or delight in discovering the gargoyle-like faces hidden in the stonework. And yet, Michigan’s legal education is vastly different today than in the days those stones were first laid. The spaces first designed for 500 students and 17 faculty members now house 1,150 students, 81 full time faculty members and 60 adjuncts and visiting professors. And the needs of our academic community have changed along with the times: technologically, pedagogically, socially. It is our responsibility both to honor our unique architectural history and to address these increasingly pressing contemporary needs. You can read more about the project and the lead architects, Last December the University’s Board of Regents approved Hartman-Cox from Washington, D.C., on pages 10–15. The the Law School’s major building and expansion project. We firm has a well-deserved reputation for award-winning design will add a new academic building south of the Quad, at the married to existing buildings of architectural significance. We corner of State and Monroe Streets, along with an enclosed are excited to enhance the Law School’s signature complex Law School Commons within the Quad between Hutchins Hall as we add critical 21st century features and facilities that will and the Legal Research building. The new facility will give us benefit students for generations to come. much needed seminar and classroom space, offices for the legal It seems especially appropriate to care for our historic clinics, space for student organizations, and faculty offices. The architectural treasures as we look ahead to the Law School’s Commons will provide the first indoor gathering spot outside sesquicentennial in 2009. Already we are renovating the the dining hall the School has ever had. All of this will support Reading Room with a generous gift from U-M alumnus our efforts to provide the best possible legal education and Charles Munger and have watched with keen interest as further the collegiality for which we are justly celebrated. craftspersons lower chandeliers in preparation for restoration First as a member of the faculty and now as dean, I have and design considerable functional improvements in tabletop, enjoyed the sense of historic significance that enfolds our overhead, and hallway lighting. The lighting will enhance the community; and yet we must build out our facilities to support learning environment while it revitalizes the room’s decora- our Law School’s scholarly energy and national leadership. tive and distinctive design. You can see some of the work in I have established building committees of faculty, staff, and progress on page 74. students to help us define our needs for academic space. This work has built a tremendous sense of momentum because these facility plans are not just blueprints for bricks and mortar— they house our vision for the future. 2 LQN SUMMER 2008 We will celebrate the groundbreaking for the new building and the completion of the Reading Room restoration as part of the School’s sesquicentennial activities. The birthday celebra- tion will kick off early in 2009 and include an autumn gala dinner for alumni and many other special events throughout the sesquicentennial year. Our Winter 2009 issue of Law Quadrangle Notes will be dedicated to the 150th anniversary. This anniversary edition will include historical highlights, special feature stories, a schedule of sesquicentennial events, and the architectural renderings for our new facilities as we look to the future of Michigan’s renowned and rigorous legal education. We have long relied on LQN to bring news of the Law School to our alumni and friends. Look for graphic updates and even more feature stories in upcoming issues as we continue to enhance this publication—such as the cover story on alumnus Jeff Fisher on page 6. In addition, we wish to expand our communication opportunities to include more timely and regular news. So beginning this year we will produce two print issues of LQN annually along with our new monthly electronic newsletter. The newsletter offers brief updates in a multi-media format, while LQN will continue to provide the more in-depth information readers have come to expect from our Law School magazine. If you wish to read the monthly e-news but have not yet received it via e-mail, visit the alumni and friends section of our website at www.law.umich.edu.
Recommended publications
  • The Spokane County GOP Recommends That Citizens Vote Rejected on R-88 Which Also Means You Are Voting to Reject I-1000

    The Spokane County GOP Recommends That Citizens Vote Rejected on R-88 Which Also Means You Are Voting to Reject I-1000

    10/10/19 Referendum Measure No. 88 The legislature passed Initiative Measure No. 1000 concerning affirmative action and remedying discrimination, and voters have filed a sufficient referendum petition on this act. Initiative I000 would allow the state to remedy discrimination On the November ballot for certain groups and to implement affirmative action, without there will be several state the use of quotas or preferential treatment (as defined), in public and local ballot measures education, employment, and contracting. along with twelve state advisory measures. When Should Initiative 1000 be ballots drop our Spokane [ ] Approved County GOP website, [ X ] Rejected www.spokanegop.com, will have information on all of these. One of the most important measures and one that seems most confusing is R-88 which is associated with Initiative 1000 (I-1000). The Spokane County GOP recommends that citizens vote Rejected on R-88 which also means you are voting to reject I-1000. Why REJECT R-88/I-1000? In spite of what proponents say, I-1000 will legalize discrimination and repeal the current existing law (I-200) that treats all people equally. I-1000 is discriminatory as it will provide preference to certain groups, but not others, because of characteristics such as race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin in public education, public employment and public contracting as long as this one discriminating characteristic is not the sole reason for affirmative action/preferential treatment. No longer will the state have to adhere to the principle of equality for everyone approved by voters in 1998 as I-200. Under I-1000 the State will be empowered to discriminate against any group it decides is underrepresented and allow lesser qualified candidates to fill positions being considered.
  • DECODING CONNERLY: Ward Connerly Research Fact Sheet

    DECODING CONNERLY: Ward Connerly Research Fact Sheet

    DECODING CONNERLY: Ward Connerly Research Fact Sheet Ward Connerly is an African-American Republican based in California who for years has toured the country proposing, and often successfully enacting, anti-equal opportunity ballot initiatives in numerous states. Connerly claims he wants to live in a color-blind society, yet welcomes the support of the white supremacist Ku Klux Klan, saying “If the Ku Klux Klan thinks that equality is right, God bless them. Thank them for finally reaching the point where logic and reason are being applied instead of hate.”1 Connerly’s campaigns deceptively employ civil rights language. He calls his proposals “civil rights” initiatives, when they are the opposite. He invokes the language and metaphors of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. to persuade people to sign onto his anti-equal opportunity initiatives.2 Connerly goes to extremes. In 2003 he tried to do away with California’s collection of health data and other statistics essential to monitoring racial disparities. His proposition, the Racial Privacy Initiative,3 failed. Of the $1.7 million in donations for that campaign, $1.4 million came from six right-wing, extremist donors.4 Connerly breaks the law. The California Racial Privacy Initiative was funded through the American Civil Rights Coalition (ACRC), a Connerly-run nonprofit organization. The state of California sued and fined ACRC for violating campaign finance laws. Connerly admitted violating the law and paid a hefty fine. He later tried to skirt financial disclosure rules again, in Michigan in 2006.5 Connerly engages in fraud and unethical tactics. Connerly has a history of lying and using deceitful tactics to obtain the required signatures for his anti-equal opportunity petitions.
  • The Portland Spectator, February 2003

    The Portland Spectator, February 2003

    Portland State University PDXScholar University Archives: Campus Publications & Portland Spectator Productions 2-15-2003 The Portland Spectator, February 2003 Portland State University. Student Publications Board Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/spectator Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Portland State University. Student Publications Board, "The Portland Spectator, February 2003" (2003). Portland Spectator. 2. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/spectator/2 This Book is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Portland Spectator by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. THE AGE OF WHITE GUILT • FOCUS ON DIVERSITY • SEX & THE CITY The Portland Spectator FEBRUARY 2003 Why Greed is Good FEBRUARY 2003 MISSION STATEMENT The purpose of the Portland Spectator is to provide the students, faculty, and staff with the alternative viewpoint to the left-wing mentality forced upon all at Portland State University. The Portland Spectator is concerned with the defense LIFE LIBERTY PROPERTY and advancement of the ideals under which our great Republic was founded. Our viewpoint originates from the following principles: Editor-in-Chief Individual Liberty Napoleon Linardatos Limited Government Managing Editor Free Market Economy and Free Trade Joey Coon The Rule of Law Senior Editor Shahriyar Smith The Portland Spectator is published by the Portland State University Copy Editor Publication Board; and is staffed solely by volunteer editors and writers. The Mary McShane Portland Spectator is funded through incidental student fees, advertisement rev- enue, and private donations.
  • Why Affirmative Action Remains Essential in the Age of Obama Reginald T

    Why Affirmative Action Remains Essential in the Age of Obama Reginald T

    Campbell Law Review Volume 31 Article 4 Issue 3 Spring 2009 January 2009 Why Affirmative Action Remains Essential in the Age of Obama Reginald T. Shuford Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.campbell.edu/clr Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons Recommended Citation Reginald T. Shuford, Why Affirmative Action Remains Essential in the Age of Obama, 31 Campbell L. Rev. 503 (2009). This Speech is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Repository @ Campbell University School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Campbell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Repository @ Campbell University School of Law. Shuford: Why Affirmative Action Remains Essential in the Age of Obama Why Affirmative Action Remains Essential in the Age of Obama REGINALD T. SHUFORD* INTRODUCTION With the election of Barack Obama to the most powerful position in the world, the presidency of the United States of America, many opined that America finally conquered her racial demons,' some trumpeting the term "post-racial" as though it were a fait accompli.2 That an African-American man-much less one with such a nontradi- tional name3-could ascend to the highest office in the land, they * Senior Staff Attorney, Racial Justice Program, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation. I would like to thank my colleagues at the ACLU, especially those in the Racial Justice Program, for their support and wisdom, and the inspiration they provide by their unflinching commitment to ensuring that Americans in every context experience the complete measure of what it means to be fully included in society.
  • Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Government Operations

    Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Government Operations

    S. Prt. 107–84 EXECUTIVE SESSIONS OF THE SENATE PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS VOLUME 4 EIGHTY-THIRD CONGRESS FIRST SESSION 1953 ( MADE PUBLIC JANUARY 2003 Printed for the use of the Committee on Governmental Affairs U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 83–872 WASHINGTON : 2003 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Jan 31 2003 21:53 Mar 31, 2003 Jkt 083872 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 E:\HR\OC\83872PL.XXX 83872PL COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS 107TH CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut, Chairman CARL LEVIN, Michigan FRED THOMPSON, Tennessee DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii TED STEVENS, Alaska RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio MAX CLELAND, Georgia THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah MARK DAYTON, Minnesota JIM BUNNING, Kentucky PETER G. FITZGERALD, Illinois JOYCE A. RECHTSCHAFFEN, Staff Director and Counsel RICHARD A. HERTLING, Minority Staff Director DARLA D. CASSELL, Chief Clerk PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS CARL LEVIN, Michigan, Chairman DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii, SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois TED STEVENS, Alaska ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio MAX CLELAND, Georgia THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah MARK DAYTON, Minnesota JIM BUNNING, Kentucky PETER G. FITZGERALD, Illinois ELISE J. BEAN, Staff Director and Chief Counsel KIM CORTHELL, Minority Staff Director MARY D.
  • The Negative Impact of the Diversity Rationale on White Identity Formation, 89 N.Y.U

    The Negative Impact of the Diversity Rationale on White Identity Formation, 89 N.Y.U

    University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository Articles Faculty and Deans 2014 White Like Me: The egN ative Impact of the Diversity Rationale on White Identity Formation Osamudia R. James University of Miami, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/fac_articles Part of the Education Law Commons, Law and Race Commons, and the Law and Society Commons Recommended Citation Osamudia R. James, White Like Me: The Negative Impact of the Diversity Rationale on White Identity Formation, 89 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 425 (2014). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Deans at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW VOLUME 89 MAY 2014 NUMBER 2 ARTICLES WHITE LIKE ME: THE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF THE DIVERSITY RATIONALE ON WHITE IDENTITY FORMATION OSAMUDIA R. JAMES* In several cases addressing the constitutionality of affirmative action admissions policies, the Supreme Court has recognized a compelling state interest in schools with diverse student populations. According to the Court and affirmative action proponents, the pursuit of diversity does not only benefit minority students who gain expanded access to elite institutions through affirmative action. Rather, diver- sity also benefits white students who grow through encounters with minority stu- dents, it contributes to social and intellectual life on campus, and it serves society at large by aiding the development of citizens equipped for employment and citizen- ship in an increasingly diverse country.
  • Color- Blind Constitutionalism, and Postracial Rhetoric †

    Color- Blind Constitutionalism, and Postracial Rhetoric †

    The Associated Dangers of “Brilliant Disguises,” Color- Blind Constitutionalism, and Postracial Rhetoric † andré douglas pond cummings * INTRODUCTION Affirmative action, since its inception in 1961, has been under siege. The backlash against affirmative action began in earnest almost immediately following its origination through President John F. Kennedy’s and President Lyndon B. Johnson’s Executive Orders. 1 Organized hostility in opposition to affirmative action crystallized early with “color-blind” theories posited and adopted, 2 “reverse discrimination” alleged and embraced, 3 and constitutional narrowing through adoption of white-privileged justifications. 4 Enmity against affirmative action continues unabated today as exemplified by recent academic writings and studies purporting to prove that affirmative action positively injures African Americans 5 and recent state-wide campaigns seeking to eradicate affirmative action through state constitutional amendments. 6 Further, a more subtle affront to affirmative action has emerged recently as dozens of commentators and millions of Americans now argue that, with the election of Barack Obama as president, the United States has officially entered a postracial era. 7 Postracialism, in averring that the election of an African American president formally † Copyright © 2010 andré douglas pond cummings. * Visiting Professor of Law, University of Iowa College of Law. Professor of Law, West Virginia University College of Law. J.D., Howard University School of Law. I am grateful to Professor Anne Lofaso, West Virginia University College of Law, for reading early stage drafts of this piece. Of course, as usual, the politics and errata of this Commentary belong exclusively to me. 1. President Kennedy issued Executive Order 10,925, “Establishing the President’s Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity.” Exec.
  • 2016 NLG Honorees

    2016 NLG Honorees

    ww.nlg.org/conventionLearn more! Dozens of social justice oriented CLEs, workshops, panels and events on movement law! Honoring Soffiyah Elijah • Albert Woodfox • Michael Deutsch • Audrey Bomse Javier Maldonado • Noelle Hanrahan • Emily Bock • With Keynote Speaker Elle Hearns Co-Sponsored by NYU School of Law Public Interest Law Center* | National Lawyers Guild Foundation *Current NYU Law students and 2016 graduates will receive complimentary convention registration New York City & the Origins of the Guild The New York City Chapter is thrilled to welcome you to the 2016 NLG Convention. It has been a long while since the convention was last held in NYC. Through the generous co-sponsorship of the Public Interest Law Center at NYU School of Law, including Dean Trevor Morrison, Assistant Dean for Public Service Lisa Hoyes and Prof. Helen Hershkoff, our conference this year has access to wonderful Greenwich Village classroom meeting facilities and dormitory housing. Our sincere thanks to NYU for partnering with us. 2016 is turning out to be a turning point year for law in our country. Thus, we feel especially privileged to engage allies from social justice organizations in New York and the East Coast in discussions about the future of crucial progressive issues. The Supreme Court is in the balance for the next generation; public figures project a vision which is less fair, less tolerant, and downright racist. Shocking as these times are, this is when the NLG needs to be at its best to defend peoples’ rights. Hard times have often brought out the best in the NLG. From the Guild’s early beginnings, when it was formed as a racially and ethnically integrated alternative to the segregated American Bar Association, NLG-NYC members have played an integral role.
  • NLG #Law4thepeople Convention

    NLG #Law4thepeople Convention

    NLG #LAW4THEPEOPLE CONVENTION August 2016 New York City NYU School of Law 1 Cover: Guild contingent at disarmament rally, New York City, 1982. From left: Teddi Smokler, Stanley Faulkner, Ned Smokler, Peter Weiss, Deborah Rand, Harry Rand, Victor Rabinowitz, Gordon Johnson, unidentified. Photo curated as part of the NLG's 50th anniversary photo spread by Tim Plenk, Joan Lifton, and Jonathan Moore in 1987. Layout and Design by Tasha Moro WELCOME TO NEW YORK! Dear fellow Guild members, supporters, and allies: On behalf of the New York City Chapter, welcome to the NLG’s Annual Banquet. Each year convention participants pause for an evening of celebration, to savor reflection with like-minded legal activists and recommit to the work of justice. We hope you have enjoyed convening on campus, which was once the traditional format for NLG conventions, and that you have found the facilities amenable to productive work. Please join us in heartfelt thanks to New York University School of Law’s Public Interest Law Center (PILC) for co-hosting the Convention, including Dean Trevor Morrison, Assistant Dean for Public Service Lisa Hoyes, Prof. Helen Hershkoff, NYU Law’s Events Coordinator Josie Haas, Alesha Gooden, Nikita Chardhry, Ashley Martin, and Jerry Roman of NYU’s Office of Housing Services. A special salute goes to Lisa Borge, Programs Manager of the NYU Law Public Interest Law Center. The New York City Chapter has been fortunate to have generations of members who have worked in support of movements for social justice. They have founded projects that have gone on to become national programs or nonprofit organizations, and started law collectives, movement offices, and public interest law firms.
  • Participation by the Public in the Federal Judicial Selection Process

    Participation by the Public in the Federal Judicial Selection Process

    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 43 Issue 1 Issue 1 - January 1990 Article 8 1-1990 Participation by the Public in the Federal Judicial Selection Process William G. Ross Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Judges Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons Recommended Citation William G. Ross, Participation by the Public in the Federal Judicial Selection Process, 43 Vanderbilt Law Review 1 (1990) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol43/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 43 JANUARY 1990 NUMBER 1 Participation by the Public in the Federal Judicial Selection Process William G. Ross* I. INTRODUCTION ...................................... 2 II. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ................................ 3 A. Early H istory .................................. 3 B. The Early Twentieth Century .................. 6 C. Hughes and Parker ............................ 10 D. Black, Frankfurter,and Clark .................. 13 E. Haynsworth and Carswell ...................... 15 F. Rehnquist Nomination: 1971 .................... 21 G. Recent Nominations ........................... 22 III. DEFINING THE ROLE OF THE PUBLIC ...................... 25 IV. THE ROLE OF THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION ......... 35 A. Procedures and Practices ...................... 35 B. The ABA Case ................................ 42 1. Antecedents ............................... 42 2. The District Court's Decision ............... 45 3. The Supreme Court's Decision .............. 48 4. The Concurring Opinion ................... 51 5. Criticism of the Majority and Concurring O pinions .................................. 54 V. CONGRESSIONAL REVIEw OF THE ABA STANDING COMMIT- TEE ..................................................... 61 VI.
  • Affirmative Action, Comparable Worth, and the Women's Movement

    Affirmative Action, Comparable Worth, and the Women's Movement

    TOWARD GENDER EQUALITY: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, COMPARABLE WORTH, AND THE WOMEN'S MOVEMENT SACHA E. DE LANGE* INTRODUCTION Affirmative action 1 seems to have become the most recognized strategy for integrating the sexes in the workplace. In fact, according to some scholars and activists, women are "widely assumed... [to] have been the primary benefi- ciaries of affirmative action in employment." 2 However, a study of the evidence indicates that "the actual results of affirmative action [for women] belie the rhe- toric." 3 Moreover, the assumption that affirmative action was a major part of modem anti-discrimination policy and that women could not be without it is not clearly reflected in feminist practice. In addition to affirmative action, the wo- men's movement has focused on a wide range of issues pertaining to employ- ment rights, including the concept of comparable worth, or "equal pay for work of equivalent value." 4 This concept addressed the disparity in wages through a system of job evaluations that would require employers to pay female employees in female-dominated jobs the same salaries as males in male-dominated jobs of comparable value, and was used as part of a strategy aimed at broadening the feminist base by taking on the problem of the gender-based wage gap. This Law Clerk to the Honorable Janet C. Hall, United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. J.D., New York University School of Law, 2006; M.A. (History), Leiden University (the Netherlands), 2001; B.A., Swarthmore College, 1998. The author would like to thank Profes- sor Deborah Malamud, Professor Paulette Caldwell, and the editors of the New York University Review of Law & Social Change.
  • EXTENSIONS of REMARKS 39419 Mr

    EXTENSIONS of REMARKS 39419 Mr

    December 1, 1970 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 39419 Mr. MILLS: Committee on Ways and By Mr. KASTENMEIER: By Mr. KUYKENDALL (for himself, Mr. Means. H.R. 19567. A blll to continue until H.R. 19884. A blll to provide relief in pat­ GROVER, Mr. CLEVELAND, Mr. DON H. the close of September 30, 1973, the Inter­ ent and trademark cases affected by the CLAUSEN, Mr. MCEWEN, Mr. DUNCAN, national Coffee Agreement Act of 1968; with emergency situation in the U.S. Postal Serv­ Mr. SCHWENGEL, Mr. DENNEY, Mr. amendments (Rept. No. 91-1641). Referred ice which began on March 18, 1970; to the McDONALD of Michigan, Mr. HAM­ to the Committee of the Whole House on the Committee on the Judiciary. MERSCHMIDT, Mr. BROCK, and Mr. State of the Union. By Mr. McMILLAN (for himself and ANDERSON of Tennessee) : Mr. STAGGERS: Committee on Interstate Mr FuQUA): H.R. 19891. A bill to name a Federal build­ and Foreign Commerce. S. 2162. An act to H.R. 19885. A bill to provide additiOIIlal ing in Memphis, Tenn., for the late Clifford provide for special packaging to protect chil­ revenue for the DIStrict of Columbia, and for Davis; to the Committee on Public Works. dren from serious personal injury or serious other purposes; t~ the Committee on the By Mr. PEPPER: illness resulting from handling, using, or in­ District of Columbia. H.R. 19892. A bill to declare a portion of gesting household substances, and for other By Mr. PELLY: the Oleta River in Dade County, Fla., non­ purposes; with an amendment (Rept.