DOCSLIB.ORG

Course No. Pl.Path.5.4 DISEASES of FIELD and HORTICULTURAL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Course No. Pl.Path.5.4 DISEASES of FIELD and HORTICULTURAL Theory Note B. Sc (Agril.) Course No. Pl.Path.5.4 DISEASES OF FIELD AND HORTICULTURAL CROPS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT-I(CREDIT 2+1) Semester-V Compiled and Edited by DR. D.M.PATHAK ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR AND HEAD DEPARTMENT OF PLANT PATHOLOGY COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE NAVSARI AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY CAMPUS BHARUCH -392012 Course Title: Diseases of Field and Horticultural Crops and Their Management- I Course No. Pl. Path. 5.4 Course Credit: 2 + 1 = 3 SYLLABUS Theory: Economic importance, symptoms, etiology, epidemiology, disease cycle and integrated management of diseases of Groundnut, Sesamum, Castor, Cotton, Bajra, Finger millet, Sorghum, Maize, Rice, Pigeon pea, Soybean, Black gram, green gram, Tobacco, Coconut, Pomegranate, Tea, Coffee, Banana, Papaya, Tomato, Okra, Brinjal, Cluster bean, Beans and Colocasia. Practical: Identification and histopathological studies of selected diseases of field and horticultural crops covered in theory. Field visit for the diagnosis of field and horticultural crop diseases.Collection and preservation of plant diseased specimens for Herbarium. Suggested readings: 1. Sanjeev Kumar (2016). Diseases of Field Crops and Their Integrated Management. New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi – 110 034 2. Shahid Ahamad and Udit Narain (2007). Ecofriendly management of plant diseases. Daya Publishing house, New Delhi – 110 035. 3. Rangaswami, G. and Mahadevan, A. (2008). Diseases of crop plants in India. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi – 110 001. 4. Sanjeev Kumar (2015). Diseases of horticultural crops: Identification & management. New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi – 110 034. 5. Singh,R. S. (2018). Diseases of fruit crops. MEDTECH A division of Scientific International Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi – 110 002. 6. Sharma,I. M. and Gautam,H. R. (2017). About diseases of horticultural crops. Neoti Book Agency Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi – 110 002. 7. Gupta, S. K. Sharma, R. C. and Monica Sharma (2017). Disease of Vegetable Ornamental and Spice Crops. Scientific Publishers (India) P.O. Box. 91, Jodhpur – 342 001. 8. Singh R. S. (2014). Plant Diseases. OXFORD & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi - 110 049 9. Singh, R. S. (2016). Diseases of vegetable crops. CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd. Delhi – 110 092. 10. Singh, R. S. (2017). Diseases of Fruit Crops. OXFORD & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi - 110 049 11. Steven, T. Koike, Peter Gladders and Albert O. Paulus. (2017). Vegetable Diseases. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL. Introduction: Among various causal agent of plant disease, fungi were the first to be recognized. The contagious nature of wheat smut was shown by Prevost in 1807. From this basic report, many others reported fungal diseases of crops. But systematic investigation o the pathogenic nature of plant diseases goes to the great German scientist Anton de Berry (1831- 1888) who is considered as father of plant pathology. Of the 30,000 plant diseases recorded from different countries about 5,000 diseases are present in India. There are no dependable survey of number of humans living on earth. The world population was 6.2 billion in 2000 and expected 7.1 billion by the year 2010. Currently it increased by 1 billion every 11 years. In which 50-80% of the population is engaged in agriculture. Even though 2 billion people suffer from hunger or malnutrition. To feed this people and the additional millions to come in next few years all possible methods of increasing world food supply are being pursued including crop protection i.e. disease management. It is estimated that the total annual production for all agricultural crops world wide is about $ 12000-13000 billion. Of this, about $ 500 billion worth of produce is lost annually to diseases, insects and weeds. Approximately 26 $ billion is spent annually for pesticides alone fungicides, insecticides and herbicides. In United States alone each year crop worth 9.1$ billion are lost to diseases. Significance of plant diseases: Plant diseases are important because they cause economic losses to growers. It may affects: 1. Plant diseases may limit the kinds of plants and industries in an area. 2. Plant diseases reduce the quantity and quality of plant produce. 3. Plant diseases may make plant poisonous to humans and animals. 4. Plant diseases may cause financial losses. What is Plant Pathology? Plant Pathology is the study of the microorganisms and of the environmental factors that cause disease in plants, of the mechanisms by which these factors induce disease in plants, and of the methods of preventing or controlling disease and reducing the damage it causes. When we consider plant is healthy? When plant carry out its physiological functions to the best of its genetical potential. Functions: Photosynthesis Translocation - Apoplast and symplast Metabolism Storage of photosynthetic products Reproduction- seed, flowering and fruiting Pathogenic microorganism that is the biotic agents generally referred as pathogens usually cause disease by Disturbing the metabolism of plant cell By production of enzymes, toxins, growth regulators and other secretions and there by absorbing food stuffs from host cell for their own life. Microorganisms: Fungi (Eukaryotes) Bacteria (Prokaryotes) Mollicutes: RLO- Rickettsia like organism- Fastidious Vascular Bacteria causing stunting yellowing and proliferation. MLO – Phytoplasma , SLO Viruses: Mosaic, yellowing and leaf curl Viroid: Smallest entity have only infectious RNA and no protein. Nematodes Flowering plant parasite Protozoa Algae Terminology Plant Disease: Any malfunctioning of host cells and tissues that results from continuous irritation by a pathogenic organisms or environmental factors that leads to development of symptoms. Infectious disease: Those diseases that results from infection of plant by a pathogen. In such disease pathogen can grow and multiply rapidly on diseased plants. Symptoms: The external and internal reactions or alteration of a plant as a result of disease. Sign: It is the characteristic of causal organism which will indicate the presence of causal organism. Pathogen: An entity that can cause the disease. Parasite: An organism living upon or in another living organism (the host) and obtaining its food from the invading host is called a parasite. Parasitism: Parasitism is a non-mutual relationship between organisms of different species where one organism, the parasite, benefits at the expense of the other, the host. Host: A living organism containing or invaded by a parasite, which obtains its nutrients from the organism. or a plant that supports the growth and development of the parasite that has infected it. Infection: The initiation and establishment of a parasite within a host plant. Obligate parasite: A parasite that can grow only on living organisms. Propagule: One unit of inoculum of any pathogen is called a propagule. Inoculum: The pathogen(s) that lands on or is otherwise brought into contact with the plant is called the inoculum. Primary inoculum: An inoculum that survives dormant in the winter or summer and causes the original infections in the spring or in the autumn is called a primary inoculum. Primary infections: The infections causes by primary inoculum is called primary infections. Secondary inoculum: An inoculum produced from primary infections is called a secondary inoculum. Secondary infections: The infections causes by secondary inoculum is called secondary infections. Alternate host: Plants not related to the main host of parasitic fungus, where it produces its different stages to complete one cycle (heteroecious). Alternative host: A plant other than the main host that a parasite can colonize; alternative hosts are not required for completion of the developmental cycle of the parasite. Collateral host: The wild host of same families of a pathogen is called as collateral host. Epidemiology: The study of the inter relationships between a given pathogen, the environment and groups or populations of the relevant hosts. 1. Pearlmillet/Bajra (Pennisetum typhoides L.) Pearlmillet/Bajra is one of the common millets that serve as the poor man's food grain in India, Pakistan and some part of Africa. In India it covers an area of about 10 million hectares, distributed almost over the entire country. It comes up well in any kind of soil and for this reasons poor soils not fit for growing rice, wheat& Sorghum usually are used to grow. It is grow extensively in Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh. About twenty diseases of this crop are known, only a few are important. 1.Ergot C.O. : Claviceps fusiformis Subdivision : Ascomycotina Order : Sphaeriales Family : Clavicipitaceae Occurrence & Economic importance: This disease is reported from many parts of Africa & India. In our country, it was first time reported from Satara area Maharashtra in 1956 in epiphytotic form. More severity is due to introduction of new hybrid HB-l, 2. It is also found in Delhi, Rajasthan, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Gujarat. During 1967-68 it has broken out in epiphytotic form affecting most of the newly introduced hybrid bajara varieties in all areas. Loss in hybrid varieties 58-76 %. This fungus produces ergotoxin/ergotin (alkaloid), which is poisonous to animals & human beings. Symptoms: The disease occurs only at the time of flowering. Small droplets of a pinkish or light honey colored dew like substance exudes from infected spikelet. Later these droplets become darker, coalesce and cover larger area of the cob. A few to many such spikelets may be found in a group which darken with age, and small greyish or dark brown sclerotia are formed. These sclerotia replace the ovary or grain and are about 0.5-1 cm in length 1-2 mm in diameter, are hard and woody, during harvesting and threshing sclerotia get mixed with grains. The fungus attacks the ovary and grows profusely producing masses of hyphae to form the Sclerotium. Small conidiophores on which conidia are produced formed from the hyphae. The conidia are hyaline, one celled and lunate. The honey dew like droplets in the affected ears are full of conidia. The sclerotia germinate in about a month's time producing one or two stripes on which the asci are produced.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Research Article EFFICACY of BIOCONTROL AGENTS AGAINST Phytophthora Nicotianae Var
    International Journal of Agriculture Sciences ISSN: 0975-3710 & E-ISSN: 0975-9107, Volume 10, Issue 10, 2018, pp.-6109-6110. Available online at https://www.bioinfopublication.org/jouarchive.php?opt=&jouid=BPJ0000217 Research Article EFFICACY OF BIOCONTROL AGENTS AGAINST Phytophthora nicotianae var. parasitica, THE CAUSAL ORGANISM OF BUCKEYE ROT OF TOMATO MONICA SHARMA1*, SHRIDHAR B.P.1 AND SHARMA AMIT2 1Department of Plant Pathology, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Neri, Dr YS Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Solan, 173230, Himachal Pradesh, India 2Department of Basic Science, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Neri, Dr YS Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Solan, 173230, Himachal Pradesh, India *Corresponding Author: Email - [email protected] Received: May 15, 2018; Revised: May 26, 2018; Accepted: May 27, 2018; Published: May 30, 2018 Abstract: To replace hazardous agrochemicals, biological solution is provided by nature in the form of microorganisms having capacity to suppress the growth of plant pathogens and to promote the plant growth. Buckeye rot of tomato caused by Phytophthora nicotianae var. parasitica is a serious threat to the crop production and has taken a heavy toll of the crop in India which affects mostly the fruits during both spring and winter season crops. In the present investigation, six biological control agents were screened for the efficacy against mycelial growth of P. nicotianae var. parasitica. Out of the six fungal and bacterial biocontrol agents tested, Trichoderma virens resulted in maximum mycelial growth inhibition (77.67%) of the test pathogen followed by T. hamatum (69.40 %), T. harzianum (68.52 %) and T. viride (67.43 %).
    [Show full text]
  • And Studying P. Capsici and Phytophthora Hybrids in Peru
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-2008 Generating Genetic Resources for Phytophthora capsici (L.) and Studying P. capsici and Phytophthora Hybrids in Peru Oscar Pietro Hurtado-Gonzales University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Hurtado-Gonzales, Oscar Pietro, "Generating Genetic Resources for Phytophthora capsici (L.) and Studying P. capsici and Phytophthora Hybrids in Peru. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2008. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/455 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Oscar Pietro Hurtado-Gonzales entitled "Generating Genetic Resources for Phytophthora capsici (L.) and Studying P. capsici and Phytophthora Hybrids in Peru." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Plants, Soils, and Insects. Kurt H. Lamour, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Feng Chen, John K. Moulton, Beth Mullin Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Oscar Pietro Hurtado-Gonzales entitled “Generating genetic resources for Phytophthora capsici (L.) and studying P.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Life Magill’S Encyclopedia of Science
    MAGILLS ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENCE PLANT LIFE MAGILLS ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENCE PLANT LIFE Volume 4 Sustainable Forestry–Zygomycetes Indexes Editor Bryan D. Ness, Ph.D. Pacific Union College, Department of Biology Project Editor Christina J. Moose Salem Press, Inc. Pasadena, California Hackensack, New Jersey Editor in Chief: Dawn P. Dawson Managing Editor: Christina J. Moose Photograph Editor: Philip Bader Manuscript Editor: Elizabeth Ferry Slocum Production Editor: Joyce I. Buchea Assistant Editor: Andrea E. Miller Page Design and Graphics: James Hutson Research Supervisor: Jeffry Jensen Layout: William Zimmerman Acquisitions Editor: Mark Rehn Illustrator: Kimberly L. Dawson Kurnizki Copyright © 2003, by Salem Press, Inc. All rights in this book are reserved. No part of this work may be used or reproduced in any manner what- soever or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy,recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. For information address the publisher, Salem Press, Inc., P.O. Box 50062, Pasadena, California 91115. Some of the updated and revised essays in this work originally appeared in Magill’s Survey of Science: Life Science (1991), Magill’s Survey of Science: Life Science, Supplement (1998), Natural Resources (1998), Encyclopedia of Genetics (1999), Encyclopedia of Environmental Issues (2000), World Geography (2001), and Earth Science (2001). ∞ The paper used in these volumes conforms to the American National Standard for Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, Z39.48-1992 (R1997). Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Magill’s encyclopedia of science : plant life / edited by Bryan D.
    [Show full text]
  • Disease Update
    Disease Update The Long List of Diseases Affecting Tomatoes and Peppers in a Wet Growing Season By Thomas A. Zitter Cornell University (May 2001) Introduction The 2000 growing season will be remembered for the large number of diseases that could be found on both tomatoes and peppers. Some of these diseases are common to both crops, and include bacterial leaf spot, Phytophthora blight, and white mold. In this report, we will focus on the main fungal (late blight, early blight, Septoria leaf blight, Phytophthora blight), and bacterial (spot, speck and canker) diseases of tomato/pepper. Tomato Late Blight Tomato growers should be aware that late blight infections of this crop are not new in New York, but occurrence of the disease has definitely increased during the 1990s with the arrival of new immigrant strains of Phytophthora infestans. In 1993, U.S.-7 caused widespread losses in home gardens in rural upstate New York, with the disease eventually spreading into four counties (Oneida, Herkimer, Madison and Oswego). In 1996, late blight samples confirmed in the Plant Disease Diagnostic Lab were submitted from six counties (Chautaupqua, Ontario, Tioga, Orange, Schenectady and Clinton), consisting of U.S.-1, U.S.-8 and U.S.-17. Once again, the infections for the most part were limited to home gardens or tomato plantings used for nearby roadside stands. In 1997, both commercial and homeowners suffered the greatest losses to late blight previously recorded. Tomato late blight was verified by the Diagnostic Lab from samples submitted from 12 counties from western, central and eastern New York.
    [Show full text]
  • O Pap N Ayaa
    TTEECCHHNNIICCAALL DDOOCCUUMMEENNTT FFOORR MMAARRKKEETT AACCCCEESSSS OONN PPAAPPAAYYAA CROP PROTECTIOACKNOWLEDGEMEN & PLANT QUARANNTTI NE SERVICES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE KUALA LUMPUR MALAYSIA 2004 Technical Document For Market Access On Papaya: 2004 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Ms. Asna Booty Othman, Director, Crop Protection and Plant Quarantine Services Division, Department of Agriculture Malaysia, wishes to extend her appreciation and gratitude to the following for their contribution, assistance and cooperation in the preparation of this Technical Document For Papaya:- Mr. Muhamad Hj. Omar, Assistant Director, Phytosanitary and Export Control Section, Crop Protection and Plant Quarantine Services Division, Department of Agriculture Malaysia; Ms. Nuraizah Hashim, Agriculture Officer, Phytosanitary and Export Control Section, Crop Protection and Plant Quarantine Services Division, Department of Agriculture Malaysia; Mr. Yusof Othman, Agriculture Officer, Insects Section, Crop Protection and Plant Quarantine Services Division, Department of Agriculture Malaysia; Mr. Arizal Arshad, Agriculture Officer, Enforcement Section, Crop Protection and Plant Quarantine Services Division, Department of Agriculture Malaysia; Mr. Mansor Mohammad, Assistant Agriculture Officer, Insects Section, Crop Protection and Plant Quarantine Services Division, Department of Agriculture Malaysia; Mr. Rushdan Talib, Agriculture Officer, Vertebrate and Mollusca Section, Crop Protection and Plant Quarantine Services Division, Department of Agriculture Malaysia; Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytophthora Nicotianae Var. Nicotianae on Tomatoes
    Phytophthoranicotiana evar .nicotiana e ontomatoe s G. Weststeijn rt i NN08201,541 ^ G. Weststeijn Phytophthoranicotiana evar .nicotiana e ontomatoe s Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor in de landbouwwetenschappen, op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. ir. H. A. Leniger, hoogleraar in de technologie, in het openbaar te verdedigen op vrijdag 2 februari 1973 des namiddags te vier uur in de aula van de Landbouwhogeschool te Wageningen STELLINGEN I Bijhe tonderzoe k naar debestrijdingsmogelijkhede n van bodempathogenen behorend tot de familie van dePythiaceae is tot nu toe onvoldoende aandacht geschonken aan dero lva nd ezoospore n bijhe tziekteproce s ind egrond . II De conclusie van Ho, dat Phytophthora megasperma Drechsler var. sojae Hildebrand in de grond hoogstwaarschijnlijk in ziek sojaboonweefsel overblijft, is niet geiecht- vaardigd. Ho,H . H., Mycologia 61(1969 )835-838 . Ill De invloed van de groeiomstandigheden op de lengte-breedte-verhouding van de sporangien van Phytophthora palmivora(Butl. ) Butl. is onvoldoendeonderzoch t om dezeeigenscha p tegebruike n voor eentaxonomisch e onderverdelingva nd eschimmel . Turner, P.D. ,Trans.Br.mycol .Soc .4 3(1960 )665-672 . IV Het onderzoek naar de invloed van uitwendige omstandigheden op de groei van groentegewassen ondergla smoe tmee rgerich tzij n opd emogelijkhede n tot bestrijding vanziekte nda n opdi eto t vermeerderingva nd ekilogramopbrengst . V Bij de bestudering van de invloed van luchttemperatuurwisselingen op de groei van groentegewassen wordt te weinig rekening gehouden met het daardoor veroorzaakte verloopva nd egrondtemperatuur . Hussey,G. ,J .exp .Bot . 16(1965 )373-385 . VI Het is verwarrend in de mycologie de term 'vegetatief te gebruiken, als daaraan een anderebetekeni sword tgehech tda ni nd ebotanie .
    [Show full text]
  • Characterising Plant Pathogen Communities and Their Environmental Drivers at a National Scale
    Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Characterising plant pathogen communities and their environmental drivers at a national scale A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Lincoln University by Andreas Makiola Lincoln University, New Zealand 2019 General abstract Plant pathogens play a critical role for global food security, conservation of natural ecosystems and future resilience and sustainability of ecosystem services in general. Thus, it is crucial to understand the large-scale processes that shape plant pathogen communities. The recent drop in DNA sequencing costs offers, for the first time, the opportunity to study multiple plant pathogens simultaneously in their naturally occurring environment effectively at large scale. In this thesis, my aims were (1) to employ next-generation sequencing (NGS) based metabarcoding for the detection and identification of plant pathogens at the ecosystem scale in New Zealand, (2) to characterise plant pathogen communities, and (3) to determine the environmental drivers of these communities. First, I investigated the suitability of NGS for the detection, identification and quantification of plant pathogens using rust fungi as a model system.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Buckeye Rot of Tomato Caused by Phytophthora Nicotianae
    International Journal of Chemical Studies 2019; 7(4): 1782-1786 P-ISSN: 2349–8528 E-ISSN: 2321–4902 IJCS 2019; 7(4): 1782-1786 Management of buckeye rot of tomato caused by © 2019 IJCS Received: 13-05-2019 Phytophthora nicotianae var. parasitica under Accepted: 15-06-2019 mid-hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh Gurpreet Kaur Department of Plant Pathology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Gurpreet Kaur and DK Banyal Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, India Abstract Buckeye rot of tomato caused by Phytophthora nicotianae var. parasitica (Dastur) Waterhouse is one of DK Banyal Department of Plant Pathology, the most serious disease of tomato throughout the world and causes high yield losses. For the CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi management of the disease different botanicals, biocontrol agents and fungicides were evaluated against Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, the pathogen under in vitro. The fungicides were also evaluated under field conditions during 2017 and Himachal Pradesh, India 2018. Aqueous extract of Melia azedarach @ 20% gave maximum growth inhibition (70.00%) of P. nicotianae var. parasitica under in vitro. Among 8 fungicides evaluated in vitro, iprovalicarb 5.5%+ propineb 61.25% WP (Melody Duo 66.75 WP) at 100 µg/ml gave 100 per cent mycelial growth inhibition. Evaluation of fungicides under field conditions showed that three foliar application at 10 days interval of iprovalicarb 5.5%+ propineb 61.25% WP (@ 0.25%) resulted in maximum (54.72%) disease control with 81.51 per cent increase in yield over check. Keywords: Tomato, buckeye rot, Phytophthora nicotianae var. parasitica management, botanicals Introduction Tomato buckeye rot caused by Phytophthora nicotianae var.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitivity of Phytophthora Nicotianae Var. Parasitica Causing Buckeye Rot of Tomato to Commonly Used Fungicides in Himachal Pradesh
    Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2019) 8(8): 1198-1207 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 8 Number 08 (2019) Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.808.141 Sensitivity of Phytophthora nicotianae var. parasitica Causing Buckeye Rot of Tomato to Commonly Used Fungicides in Himachal Pradesh Gurpreet Kaur* and D.K. Banyal Department of Plant Pathology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur 176 062, Himachal Pradesh, India *Corresponding author ABSTRACT Buckeye rot caused by Phytophthora nicotianae var. parasitica (dastur) Waterhouse is the serious menace to the cultivation of tomato in Himachal Pradesh. Seventeen isolates of Phytophthora nicotianae var. parasiitca causing buckeye rot were collected from different districts of Himachal Pradesh. Sensitivity of these isolates to three commonly used fungicides i.e. mancozeb 75WP K e yw or ds (Indofil M-45), copper-oxychloride 50WP (Blitox-50) & metalaxyl-M 4%+ mancozeb 64%WP (Ridomil Gold) in Himachal Pradesh was examined by dual culture technique. On the basis of Phytophthora nicotianae sensitivity to fungicides the 17 isolates were categorized into three sensitivity classes i.e. highly var. parasitica, Buckeye rot, Tomato, Sensitivity, sensitive, moderately sensitive and less sensitive isolates. Out of seventeen isolates, nine isolates Fungicides , Management were highly sensitive (Pn-3, Pn-4, Pn-5, Pn-7, Pn-9, Pn-10, Pn-12, Pn-14 & Pn-17), seven isolates (Pn-1, Pn-2, Pn-6, Pn-8, Pn-11, Pn-15 & Pn-16) were moderately sensitive and one isolate (Pn-13) Article Info was found less sensitive to mancozeb 75WP.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Fungal Rot of Tomato Abstract Introduction
    Mycopath (2011) 9(1): 33-38 An overview of the fungal rot of tomato A. H. Wani Section of Mycology and Plant Pathology, Department of Botany University of Kashmir 190006, India *Correspondence E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum L.) is the most popular vegetable world-wide. Tomatoes crop and yield is suffered every year due to number of pathogenic diseases. Such diseases are caused by fungi, bacteria, viruses and nematode, develop through soil-borne, above-ground infections and in some instances are transmitted through insect feeding. Although some general review on the fungal diseases of vegetables have been compiled by different workers. However, no comprehensive review is available on the fungal rot of tomato. The present review gives inclusive information regarding various pathological aspects on the fungal rot of tomato and management strategies opted for post harvest diseases of tomato. Keywords: Review, Fungi, Rot, Tomato, Morphology, Fungicides. Introduction Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) symptomology, severity/incidence, pathogenicity, originated South America belongs to Solanaceae losses and disease control with fungicides. family is a widely grown vegetable in the world. Alternaria rot has been considered as the The leading producer of tomato in the world is most common disease of tomato fruits and causes USA followed by China, Italy, Turkey, Egypt, heavy losses in quality of the fruits, thus rendering Spain, Romania, Brazil and Greece. In Kashmir large quantity of tomato fruits unfit for Valley (India), the crop is grown over an area of consumption. The disease was reported by 1200 hectares with an average yield of 250-300 Douglas (1922) from the California.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Disease
    report on RPD No. 913 PLANT October 1988 DEPARTMENT OF CROP SCIENCES DISEASE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN LATE BLIGHT AND BUCKEYE ROT OF TOMATO Late blight of tomato is caused by the fungus Phytophthora infestans. Currently, two physiologic races of the fungus, designated T-0 and T-1, have been identified. There are also potato and tomato strains of the fungus; each is capable of infecting the other host. Buckeye rot is caused by three species of Phytophthora. P. parasitica is most commonly asso- ciated with the disease in Illinois; in other areas of the country the disease is attributed to P. capsici and/or P. drechsleri. Figure 1. Late blight first appears as water-soaked, greenish black areas on leaves and stems that later turn These two diseases may be widespread and brown. Often a pale green band surrounds the affected destructive in Illinois during wet seasons when the area on the leaf. (Courtesy R.E. Stall) foliage and fruit are not protected by fungicides. In cool, moist weather the vines and fruit rot very rapidly from late blight. During prolonged warm, wet weather a large percentage of the tomato fruit in contact with the soil may be affected by buckeye rot. SYMPTOMS Late Blight On seedlings, small, dark spots form on the stems or leaves followed by death within 2 or 3 days. On older plants the fungus causes small to large, irregular, rapidly enlarging, water-soaked, pale green to greenish black lesions which usually start at the margins or tips of the leaves. In dry weather, these lesions turn dark brown, dry, and wither.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science
    Phytophthora Rot of Tofiiato 299 PHYTOPHTHORA ROT OF TOMATO, EGGPLANT, AND PEPPER/ James B. Kendrick, Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station. A Phytophthora rot, apparently identical with buckeye rot of toma- to appeared in epidemic form in an experimental plot of tomatoes at Lafayette, Indiana, August 1-3, 1921. The disease continued through- out the summer and destroyed about 40 per cent of the tomato fruits. A few weeks later, a very similar disease developed on eggplant and sweet pepper fruits growing adjacent to the tomatoes, and from all of these, the same Phytophthora was repeatedly isolated. With the Phy- tophthora isolated from tomato, successful inoculations were secured on eggplant and pepper fruits. The organism was repeatedly isolated from inoculated eggplant and pepper fruits. So far as has been determined, this disease has not been previously reported in Indiana under field conditions. History.—The genus Phytophthora contains a number of species which are separated by apparently minor and none too stable differences. Rosenbaum- made an extensive comparative study of nine described species of Phytophthora and presented a tentative table for the separa- tion of species based on his studies. SherbakofP working in Florida, described a buckeye rot of tomatoes in 1917 which he attributed to an undescribed species of Phytophthora to which he gave the name, P. tcrrestris. Using the fungus isolated from tomato, he inoculated tomatoes, sweet peppers, watermelon fruit, lemons, and tubers of Irish potatoes and secured infection in every case. Late blight of potatoes, caused by Phtjtophthora infestans, has been reported on tomatoes in West Virginia by Giddings.' It occurred on leaf, stem and fruit, causing a rot of the fruit.
    [Show full text]