DOCSLIB.ORG

A Pittetd-Thesis Sample

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

POLITICAL LEARNING AND THE NUMBER OF PARTIES: WHY AGE MATTERS by Ekaterina R. Rashkova MA, Washington University, 2006 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2010 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE This dissertation was presented by Ekaterina R. Rashkova It was defended on April 16, 2010 and approved by Scott Morgenstern, Department of Political Science, University of Pittsburgh Alberta Sbragia, Department of Political Science, University of Pittsburgh Steven Finkel, Department of Political Science, University of Pittsburgh Venelin Ganev, Department of Political Science, Miami University in Ohio Dissertation Director: Scott Morgenstern, Department of Political Science, University of Pittsburgh ii Copyright c by Ekaterina R. Rashkova 2010 iii POLITICAL LEARNING AND THE NUMBER OF PARTIES: WHY AGE MATTERS Ekaterina R. Rashkova, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2010 Party system fractionalization was re-invented as an unsolved puzzle after the fall of the Berlin Wall. While scholars agree that the stability of the party system is imperative for the proper functioning of democracy, many note the high number of political parties in the East European states. Still, we lack a systematic analysis of party system development in those countries. A possible reason for this gap is that extant theories on the number of parties were written with established democracies in mind and are thus unequipped to explain the dynamics taking place in young democracies. This dissertation attempts to fill this gap providing at least preliminary answers for the variation in the number of parties between new and more established democracies. My theory proposes that learning the effect of institutions is crucial to whether they actually have an effect or not and is integral to understanding the number of parties in a given system. Furthermore, I argue that certain institutional arrangements, for example the translation of votes into seats, may play a more important role than the district magnitude when present. I view learning as coming from trial-and-error experience which elite members get by political participation over time, as well as experience with a changing institutional environment both within and external to the party system as such. To test my propositions I use a three-level hierarchical model on district data of 20 European democracies. The results show that at the district level, age of democracy has a positive effect on the level of party system convergence and the effect is stronger in young democracies. The analysis further reveals that pre-electoral institutional constraints such as signatures and deposits have a positive and significant effect on party system convergence, iv while in the presence of EU-related events the convergence index drops, likely due to the additional incentives for political competition that such events bring. Public funding does not prove significant and the effect of age of democracy on party system convergence in mature democracies remains inconclusive as alternate specifications elicit varying results. v TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ......................................... xii 1.0 STRATEGIC VOTING AND STRATEGIC ENTRY - DO WE HAVE THE WHOLE STORY? .............................1 1.1 Introducing Party System Convergence.....................1 1.2 The Problem...................................4 1.2.1 Spatial Theory Models..........................6 1.2.2 Electoral Systems Models......................... 10 1.2.3 Why Parties................................ 16 1.3 The Puzzle.................................... 18 1.4 A Possible Solution................................ 19 1.5 Research Design................................. 21 2.0 TOWARDS A THEORY OF POLITICAL LEARNING ......... 22 2.1 Political Learning................................. 26 2.2 Studying the Number of Parties - National vs. District Level......... 36 2.3 Party Systems Change.............................. 40 2.3.1 Party Splits................................ 41 2.3.2 Party Mergers............................... 44 2.3.3 New Parties and Party Dissolution.................... 48 2.4 Conclusion.................................... 49 3.0 POLITICAL LEARNING IN WESTERN AND EASTERN EUROPE: A DISTRICT-LEVEL EMPIRICAL TEST ................. 51 3.1 The TENP and the Party System Convergence Index............. 53 vi 3.2 Data & Operationalization of Independent Variables............. 61 3.3 Model Specification and Methodology..................... 71 3.4 Empirical Results................................. 76 3.5 Conclusion.................................... 82 4.0 POLITICAL LEARNING AND THE NUMBER OF PARTIES: THE CASE OF BULGARIA ............................. 88 4.1 Why Bulgaria?.................................. 92 4.2 Political Learning at the District Level..................... 94 4.2.1 Electoral Competition in Bulgaria - an overall view.......... 95 4.2.2 Electoral Competition at the District Level............... 99 4.3 Politics-on-the-go................................. 106 4.3.1 The Legislative Parties.......................... 112 4.4 Conlusion..................................... 122 5.0 POLITICAL LEARNING: WHAT MAKES IT OR BREAKS IT? EV- IDENCE FROM 3 (OTHER) SOUTHEAST EUROPEAN DEMOC- RACIES ....................................... 127 5.1 Slovenia...................................... 131 5.2 Croatia...................................... 139 5.3 Romania..................................... 145 5.4 Conclusion.................................... 150 6.0 THE EFFECT OF EP PARTICIPATION ON NATIONAL PARTY SYSTEMS ...................................... 155 6.1 Europeanization and the New European Democracies............. 157 6.2 The Reductive Hypothesis............................ 161 6.3 Empirics..................................... 168 6.3.1 The Case of Bulgaria........................... 169 6.3.2 The Case of Romania........................... 178 6.3.3 The Case of Slovenia........................... 182 6.3.4 Additional evidence and the negative case................ 186 6.4 Conclusion.................................... 189 vii 7.0 CONCLUSION: POLITICAL LEARNING AND THE NUMBER OF PARTIES - WHAT LESSONS CAN WE DRAW .............. 195 APPENDIX. ....................................... 204 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................... 207 viii LIST OF TABLES 1 Predicting the number of political parties in European democracies...... 67 2 Summary Statistics................................ 69 3 Correlation Matrix................................. 70 4 The Effect of Democratic Maturity on Party System Convergence....... 84 5 The Effect of Institutional Factors on Party System Convergence....... 85 6 The Effect of EU Factors on Party System Convergence............ 86 7 The Impact of GDPppp per capita on Party System Convergence....... 87 8 Electoral Competition Overview......................... 96 9 District-level Characteristics of Bulgaria's Party System............ 114 10 District-level Effective Number of Parties in Bulgaria.............. 115 11 Party System Convergence in Bulgaria...................... 116 12 Legislative Results for the period between 1991-2009.............. 117 13 District-level Characteristics of Slovenia's Party System............ 133 14 District-level Effective Number of Parties in Slovenia.............. 134 15 Party System Convergence in Slovenia...................... 137 16 District-level Characteristics of Croatia's Party System............. 142 17 District-level Effective Number of Parties in Croatia.............. 143 18 Party System Convergence in Croatia...................... 145 19 District-level Characteristics of Romania's Party System............ 152 20 District-level Effective Number of Parties in Romania............. 153 21 Party System Convergence in Romania..................... 154 22 The number of political parties in post-communist Bulgaria, 1990-2005.... 174 ix 23 Bulgarian EP election results, 2007........................ 175 24 The number of political parties in Romania, 1992-2004............. 180 25 Romanian EP election results, 2007....................... 192 26 The number of political parties in post-communist Slovenia, 1992-2008.... 192 27 Slovenian EP election results, 2004........................ 193 28 Representation in the European Parliament................... 194 29 District-level Ethnic Heterogeneity Data Snapshot............... 206 x LIST OF FIGURES 1 Level of Party System Convergence....................... 68 2 Do Politicians Learn Over Time?......................... 69 3 Growth trajectories of party system convergence................ 73 4 Party System Change in 3 Bulgarian Districts.................. 97 5 Party System Change in 3 Slovenian Districts.................. 138 6 Party System Change in 3 Croatian Districts.................. 144 7 Party System Change in 3 Romanian Districts................. 147 xi PREFACE Upon the successful completion of this massive task called dissertation and during the years of my graduate student life I have become indebted to many people who deserve much more than I can express in words. First, I would like to thank Scott Morgenstern and Norman Schofield, without whom none of this would have taken place. Scott chaired my dissertation and was my advisor and guide through all the struggles of the graduate career. His constructive criticism, selfless character, and most of all his believing in me, really pushed me forward and helped me see this
Recommended publications
  • Voter Turnout in Texas: Can It Be Higher?

    Voter Turnout in Texas: Can It Be Higher?

    Voter Turnout in Texas: Can It Be Higher? JAMES MCKENZIE Texas Lyceum Fellow WHAT’S THE TAKEAWAY? In the 2016 presidential election, Texas’ voter turnout Texas’ voter turnout is among placed near the bottom of all the states, ranking 47th. In the lowest in the nation. Texas’ recent 2018 mid-term election, which featured a Low turnout can lead to policies closely contested US Senate race and concurrent favoring the interests of gubernatorial election, not even half of eligible voters demographic groups whose (46.3%) participated.1 members are more likely to vote. Low voter turnout is not a recent phenomenon in Texas. Tex- There are deterrents to as has consistently lagged the national average in presidential registering and voting that the elections for voter turnout among the voting eligible popula- state can address. tion (VEP). In fact, since 2000, the gap between Texas’ turn- out and the national average consecutively widened in all but Policies such as same-day registration, automatic voter one election cycle.2 Texans may be open to changes to address registration, mail-in early voting, low turnout. According to a 2019 poll by the Texas Lyceum on and Election Day voting centers Texans’ attitudes toward democracy, a majority (61%) agreed could help. that “significant changes” are needed to make our electoral system work for current times.3 VOLUME 10 | ISSUE 6 | SEPTEMBER 2019 2 DOES VOTER TURNOUT MATTER? This report addresses ways to boost voter Voter turnout is often considered the curren- participation in both population sets. cy of democracy, a way for citizen’s prefer- ences to be expressed.
  • Randomocracy

    Randomocracy

    Randomocracy A Citizen’s Guide to Electoral Reform in British Columbia Why the B.C. Citizens Assembly recommends the single transferable-vote system Jack MacDonald An Ipsos-Reid poll taken in February 2005 revealed that half of British Columbians had never heard of the upcoming referendum on electoral reform to take place on May 17, 2005, in conjunction with the provincial election. Randomocracy Of the half who had heard of it—and the even smaller percentage who said they had a good understanding of the B.C. Citizens Assembly’s recommendation to change to a single transferable-vote system (STV)—more than 66% said they intend to vote yes to STV. Randomocracy describes the process and explains the thinking that led to the Citizens Assembly’s recommendation that the voting system in British Columbia should be changed from first-past-the-post to a single transferable-vote system. Jack MacDonald was one of the 161 members of the B.C. Citizens Assembly on Electoral Reform. ISBN 0-9737829-0-0 NON-FICTION $8 CAN FCG Publications www.bcelectoralreform.ca RANDOMOCRACY A Citizen’s Guide to Electoral Reform in British Columbia Jack MacDonald FCG Publications Victoria, British Columbia, Canada Copyright © 2005 by Jack MacDonald All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by an information storage and retrieval system, now known or to be invented, without permission in writing from the publisher. First published in 2005 by FCG Publications FCG Publications 2010 Runnymede Ave Victoria, British Columbia Canada V8S 2V6 E-mail: [email protected] Includes bibliographical references.
  • Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Slovenia On

    Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Slovenia On

    DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND LEGAL AFFAIRS DIRECTORATE OF MONITORING Strasbourg, 7 December 2007 Public Greco Eval III Rep (2007) 1E Theme II Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Slovenia on Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II) Adopted by GRECO at its 35 th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 3-7 December 2007) Secrétariat du GRECO GRECO Secretariat www.coe.int/greco Conseil de l’Europe Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex +33 3 88 41 20 00 Fax +33 3 88 41 39 55 I. INTRODUCTION 1. Slovenia joined GRECO in 1999. GRECO adopted the First Round Evaluation Report (Greco Eval I Rep (2000) 3E) in respect of Slovenia at its 4 th Plenary Meeting (12-15 December 2000) and the Second Round Evaluation Report (Greco Eval II Rep (2003) 1E) at its 16 th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 8-12 December 2003). The aforementioned Evaluation Reports, as well as their corresponding Compliance Reports, are available on GRECO’s homepage (http://www.coe.int/greco ). 2. GRECO’s current Third Evaluation Round (launched on 1 January 2007) deals with the following themes: - Theme I – Incriminations: Articles 1a and 1b, 2-12, 15-17, 19 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption (ETS 173) 1, Articles 1-6 of its Additional Protocol 2 (ETS 191) and Guiding Principle 2 (criminalisation of corruption). - Theme II – Transparency of party funding: Articles 11, 12, 13b, 14 and 16 of Recommendation Rec(2003)4 on Common Rules against Corruption in the Funding of Political Parties and Electoral Campaigns, and - more generally - Guiding Principle 15 (financing of political parties and election campaigns) .
  • The Effects of Secret Voting Procedures on Political Behavior

    The Effects of Secret Voting Procedures on Political Behavior

    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Voting Alone: The Effects of Secret Voting Procedures on Political Behavior Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/50p7t4xg Author Guenther, Scott Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Voting Alone: The Effects of Secret Voting Procedures on Political Behavior A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Scott M. Guenther Committee in charge: Professor James Fowler, Chair Professor Samuel Kernell, Co-Chair Professor Julie Cullen Professor Seth Hill Professor Thad Kousser 2016 Copyright Scott M. Guenther, 2016 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Scott M. Guenther is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Co-Chair Chair University of California, San Diego 2016 iii DEDICATION To my parents. iv EPIGRAPH Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead. { Benjamin Franklin v TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page................................... iii Dedication...................................... iv Epigraph......................................v Table of Contents.................................. vi List of Figures................................... viii List of Tables.................................... ix Acknowledgements.................................x Vita........................................
  • The Problem of Low and Unequal Voter Turnout - and What We Can Do About It

    The Problem of Low and Unequal Voter Turnout - and What We Can Do About It

    IHS Political Science Series Working Paper 54 February 1998 The Problem of Low and Unequal Voter Turnout - and What We Can Do About It Arend Lijphart Impressum Author(s): Arend Lijphart Title: The Problem of Low and Unequal Voter Turnout - and What We Can Do About It ISSN: Unspecified 1998 Institut für Höhere Studien - Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS) Josefstädter Straße 39, A-1080 Wien E-Mail: offi [email protected] Web: ww w .ihs.ac. a t All IHS Working Papers are available online: http://irihs. ihs. ac.at/view/ihs_series/ This paper is available for download without charge at: http://irihs.ihs.ac.at/1045/ Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS), Wien Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna Reihe Politikwissenschaft / Political Science Series No. 54 The Problem of Low and Unequal Voter Turnout – and What We Can Do About It Arend Lijphart 2 — Arend Lijphart / The Problem of Low and Unequal Voter Turnout — I H S The Problem of Low and Unequal Voter Turnout – and What We Can Do About It Arend Lijphart Reihe Politikwissenschaft / Political Science Series No. 54 February 1998 Prof. Dr. Arend Lijphart Department of Political Science, 0521 University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla, California 92093–0521 USA e-mail: [email protected] Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS), Wien Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna 4 — Arend Lijphart / The Problem of Low and Unequal Voter Turnout — I H S The Political Science Series is published by the Department of Political Science of the Austrian Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS) in Vienna. The series is meant to share work in progress in a timely way before formal publication.
  • Journal of Comparative Politics 2

    Journal of Comparative Politics 2

    Volume 4, Number 1, January 2011 CompaJ O U R N A Lr Oa F tive Politics ISSN 1338-1385 GG ANGEVALUATIONGOFGTHEGQUALITYGOFGIMPACTG ASSESSMENT:G THEGCASEGOFGSLOVAKIAGANDGSLOVENIA Katarína STAROŇOVÁ GG CENTRAL-EUROPEANGINTRA-SLAVICGDIPLOMACY:GG AGCOMPARATIVEGAPPROACH Boštjan UDOVIČ GG DIMENSIONSGOFGPARTYGELECTORALGPROGRAMMES:GG SLOVENIANGEXPERIENCE Simona KUSTEC LIPICER and Samo KROPIVNIK GG HYBRIDIZATIONGOFGDEMOCRACYGINGCENTRALGANDG EASTERNGEUROPE:G BETWEENG“IMPORTED”GDEMOCRATICGMODELGANDGINHERENTG POLITICALGCULTURE Cirila TOPLAK GG FORGTHEGCOMMONGGOOD:G COMBATINGGCORRUPTIONGINGNEWGEUGMEMBERGSTATES Lars JOHANNSEN and Karin HILMER PEDERSEN Journal of Comparative Politics 2 Editorial Team General Editor General Editor Miro Haček Peter Csányi Department of Political Science Pan European University Faculty of Social Sciences Institute of Political Science University of Ljubljana Tomášikova 20, 821 02 Kardeljeva ploščad 5, Ljubljana, Slovenia Bratislava, Slovakia [email protected] [email protected] Assistant Editor Irena Bačlija Department of Political Science Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ljubljana Kardeljeva ploščad 5, Ljubljana, Slovenia [email protected] JCP uses two-sided peer review process before publication. Those wishing to sub- mit papers should send their e-version to either of the General Editors at one of the addresses above in compliance with the Submission Guidelines. The views ex- pressed are neither those of either of co-publishers. Authors retain sole copyright. Articles appearing in JCP are
  • Evaluating the Impact of Drop Boxes on Voter Turnout

    Evaluating the Impact of Drop Boxes on Voter Turnout

    Evaluating the Impact of Drop Boxes on Voter Turnout William McGuire, University of Washington Tacoma Benjamin Gonzalez O’Brien, San Diego State University Katherine Baird, University of Washington Tacoma Benjamin Corbett, Lawrence Livermore Lab Loren Collingwood, University of California Riverside Voter turnout in the United States lags behind most other developed democracies. A popular approach for increasing turnout is to improve the ease of voting. While evidence indicates that vote by mail (VBM) requirements increase voter turnout, there is little evidence of the impact ballot drop boxes have on voting, despite the fact that voters in VBM states often prefer these boxes to voting via the postal service. All VBM states (currently Washington, Colorado and Oregon) require some provision for voting by drop boxes. This project examines the impact the installation of new ballot drop boxes had on voter turnout in Pierce County, the second largest county in Washington State. To identify the causal effects of these boxes on the decision to vote, we exploit the randomized placement of five new ballot drop boxes in Pierce prior to the 2017 general election. Voters selected to receive a new ballot drop box experienced an average reduction in distance to their nearest drop box of 1.31 miles. We estimate that this change in proximity to drop boxes increased voter turnout. Specifically, we find overall a 0.64 percentage point increase in voting per mile of distance to nearest drop box reduced. The effect, hence, is not a particularly large one. However, within the context of the very low turnout in Pierce County in 2017 and compared with alternative ways election officials have attempted to encourage more people to vote, this effect is not negligible.
  • Political Party Names Used in the Last 10 Years As Of: September 25, 2021

    Political Party Names Used in the Last 10 Years As Of: September 25, 2021

    Page 1 of 6 Political Party Names Used in the Last 10 Years As of: September 25, 2021 Party Name Ballot Name Other Names Advocational International Democratic Advocational Party AID Party Party of British Columbia Advocates Advocational Democrats Advocational International Democratic Party Advocational International Democratic Party of BC Advocational Party of BC Advocational Party of British Columbia Democratic Advocates International Advocates B.C. New Republican Party Republican Party B.C. Vision B.C. Vision B.C. Vision Party BCV British Columbia Vision BC Citizens First Party BC Citizens First Party British Columbia Citizens First Party BC Ecosocialists BC Ecosocialists BC Eco-Socialists BC EcoSocialists BC Ecosocialist Alliance BC Ecosocialist Party BC First Party BC First BC Marijuana Party BC Marijuana Party British Columbia Marijuana Party Page 2 of 6 Political Party Names Used in the Last 10 Years As of: September 25, 2021 Party Name Ballot Name Other Names BC NDP BC NDP BC New Democratic Party BC New Democrats British Columbia New Democratic Party Formerly known as: New Democratic Party of B.C. NDP New Democratic Party New Democrats BC Progressive Party Pro BC BC Progressives Progressive Party BC Refederation Party BC Refed Formerly known as: Western Independence Party Formerly known as: Western Refederation Party of BC British Columbia Action Party BC Action Party BCAP British Columbia Direct Democracy British Columbia Direct BC Direct Party Democracy Party BC Direct Democracy Party Direct Democracy British Columbia Excalibur Party BC Excalibur Party British Columbia Liberal Party BC Liberal Party British Columbia Libertarian Party Libertarian Libertarian Party of BC British Columbia Party British Columbia Party BC Party BCP British Columbia Patriot Party B.C.
  • Populism and Politics: William Alfred Peffer and the People's Party

    Populism and Politics: William Alfred Peffer and the People's Party

    University of Kentucky UKnowledge American Politics Political Science 1974 Populism and Politics: William Alfred Peffer and the People's Party Peter H. Argersinger University of Maryland Baltimore County Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Argersinger, Peter H., "Populism and Politics: William Alfred Peffer and the People's Party" (1974). American Politics. 8. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_political_science_american_politics/8 POPULISM and POLITICS This page intentionally left blank Peter H. Argersinger POPULISM and POLITICS William Alfred Peffer and the People's Party The University Press of Kentucky ISBN: 978-0-8131-5108-3 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 73-86400 Copyright © 1974 by The University Press of Kentucky A statewide cooperative scholarly publishing agency serving Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky State College, Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University- Editorial and Sales Offices: Lexington, Kentucky
  • Political Party Names Used in the Last 10 Years As Of: September 24, 2021

    Political Party Names Used in the Last 10 Years As Of: September 24, 2021

    Page 1 of 6 Political Party Names Used in the Last 10 Years As of: September 24, 2021 Party Name Ballot Name Other Names Advocational International Democratic Advocational Party AID Party Party of British Columbia Advocates Advocational Democrats Advocational International Democratic Party Advocational International Democratic Party of BC Advocational Party of BC Advocational Party of British Columbia Democratic Advocates International Advocates B.C. New Republican Party Republican Party B.C. Vision B.C. Vision B.C. Vision Party BCV British Columbia Vision BC Citizens First Party BC Citizens First Party British Columbia Citizens First Party BC Ecosocialists BC Ecosocialists BC Eco-Socialists BC EcoSocialists BC Ecosocialist Alliance BC Ecosocialist Party BC First Party BC First BC Marijuana Party BC Marijuana Party British Columbia Marijuana Party Page 2 of 6 Political Party Names Used in the Last 10 Years As of: September 24, 2021 Party Name Ballot Name Other Names BC NDP BC NDP BC New Democratic Party BC New Democrats British Columbia New Democratic Party Formerly known as: New Democratic Party of B.C. NDP New Democratic Party New Democrats BC Progressive Party Pro BC BC Progressives Progressive Party BC Refederation Party BC Refed Formerly known as: Western Independence Party Formerly known as: Western Refederation Party of BC British Columbia Action Party BC Action Party BCAP British Columbia Direct Democracy British Columbia Direct BC Direct Party Democracy Party BC Direct Democracy Party Direct Democracy British Columbia Excalibur Party BC Excalibur Party British Columbia Liberal Party BC Liberal Party British Columbia Libertarian Party Libertarian Libertarian Party of BC British Columbia Party British Columbia Party BC Party BCP British Columbia Patriot Party B.C.
  • Models of Democracy and the Design of Slovenian Political Party Web Sites

    Models of Democracy and the Design of Slovenian Political Party Web Sites

    Models of Democracy and the Design of Slovenian Political Party Web Sites Simon Delakorda Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, [email protected] Abstract. Web sites of Slovenian political parties do not fully exploit the Internet’s potential for interactive and deliberative communication on political issues with citizens, because they favour a competitive-elitist perception of democracy. As result, political party’s web sites are mainly used for political mobilization, agitation in persuasion. Supporting this model of democracy via web pages enables political parties to strengthen their position of power and control in decision-making process, to legitimise a hegemonic position of representative democracy within political system, to impose the perception of citizens as consumers of political information and to provide democratic legitimization for capitalist mode of production. In order to strengthen citizen’s e-participation on political issues, a conceptual shift in designing political party’s web sites according to participatory and deliberative model of democracy is needed. Keywords: Political parties, Web sites, Electronic democracy, Citizens, Slovenia 1 Introduction There is a wide recognition among authors that Internet is playing an increasingly important role in party politics [Vreg, 2000; Selm, Jankowski and Tsaliki, 2001; Norris, 2003; Gibson, Lusoli and Ward, 2003]. Political parties in western democracies have recognized the importance of Internet technology in improving their communication strategies, political mobilization and information delivery. On the other hand, many authors argue [Nixon and Johansson, 1998; Becker and Slaton, 2000; Franz, 2000] that the web sites of political parties do not fully exploit the potential of the Internet for participatory means.
  • I Thank You for the Opportunity You Gave Me in Your Issue of the 3Rd Inst. to Present to the Populists of North Carolina My View

    I Thank You for the Opportunity You Gave Me in Your Issue of the 3Rd Inst. to Present to the Populists of North Carolina My View

    Mr. Kestler Again. [The Progressive Farmer, March 24, 1896] He Reples [sic] to Mr. Green and Quotes Other Authorities. Correspondence of the Progressive Farmer. I thank you for the opportunity you gave me in your issue of the 3rd inst. to present to the Populists of North Carolina my views on the political situation, and as you were so kind as to give my good friend, Mr. Green, space to reply to me, I will again ask you for space to more fully establish my position and to controvert my friend’s arguments. My aim in this matter is to carry our banner to victory in November, and no one has yet denied but what my proposed plan would do it, and every one has admitted that Mr. Butler’s and Mr. Green’s plan would cause us defeat. My impression was that we wanted to win; that there was a goal ahead for us to reach, and I was working towards that end. My opponent doesn’t seem to care whether we win or lose; and “All’s well that ends well.” Now, as to that article. My friend sees a seeming contradiction between the statements that I said the people were with me, and that “I felt like one who treads alone,” etc. Such is not the case. In the latter statement I was telling the effect Mr. Butler’s plan would have upon our party, and I called upon all not to heed his advice, but to stick to their party and to their principles. To disconnect any article is hardly fair; you destroy the meaning.