Are Trees Allowed in Utility Easement
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Responses of Plant Communities to Grazing in the Southwestern United States Department of Agriculture United States Forest Service
Responses of Plant Communities to Grazing in the Southwestern United States Department of Agriculture United States Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Daniel G. Milchunas General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-169 April 2006 Milchunas, Daniel G. 2006. Responses of plant communities to grazing in the southwestern United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-169. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 126 p. Abstract Grazing by wild and domestic mammals can have small to large effects on plant communities, depend- ing on characteristics of the particular community and of the type and intensity of grazing. The broad objective of this report was to extensively review literature on the effects of grazing on 25 plant commu- nities of the southwestern U.S. in terms of plant species composition, aboveground primary productiv- ity, and root and soil attributes. Livestock grazing management and grazing systems are assessed, as are effects of small and large native mammals and feral species, when data are available. Emphasis is placed on the evolutionary history of grazing and productivity of the particular communities as deter- minants of response. After reviewing available studies for each community type, we compare changes in species composition with grazing among community types. Comparisons are also made between southwestern communities with a relatively short history of grazing and communities of the adjacent Great Plains with a long evolutionary history of grazing. Evidence for grazing as a factor in shifts from grasslands to shrublands is considered. An appendix outlines a new community classification system, which is followed in describing grazing impacts in prior sections. -
List of Approved Plants
APPENDIX "X" – PLANT LISTS Appendix "X" Contains Three (3) Plant Lists: X.1. List of Approved Indigenous Plants Allowed in any Landscape Zone. X.2. List of Approved Non-Indigenous Plants Allowed ONLY in the Private Zone or Semi-Private Zone. X.3. List of Prohibited Plants Prohibited for any location on a residential Lot. X.1. LIST OF APPROVED INDIGENOUS PLANTS. Approved Indigenous Plants may be used in any of the Landscape Zones on a residential lot. ONLY approved indigenous plants may be used in the Native Zone and the Revegetation Zone for those landscape areas located beyond the perimeter footprint of the home and site walls. The density, ratios, and mix of any added indigenous plant material should approximate those found in the general area of the native undisturbed desert. Refer to Section 8.4 and 8.5 of the Design Guidelines for an explanation and illustration of the Native Zone and the Revegetation Zone. For clarity, Approved Indigenous Plants are considered those plant species that are specifically indigenous and native to Desert Mountain. While there may be several other plants that are native to the upper Sonoran Desert, this list is specific to indigenous and native plants within Desert Mountain. X.1.1. Indigenous Trees: COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME Blue Palo Verde Parkinsonia florida Crucifixion Thorn Canotia holacantha Desert Hackberry Celtis pallida Desert Willow / Desert Catalpa Chilopsis linearis Foothills Palo Verde Parkinsonia microphylla Net Leaf Hackberry Celtis reticulata One-Seed Juniper Juniperus monosperma Velvet Mesquite / Native Mesquite Prosopis velutina (juliflora) X.1.2. Indigenous Shrubs: COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME Anderson Thornbush Lycium andersonii Barberry Berberis haematocarpa Bear Grass Nolina microcarpa Brittle Bush Encelia farinosa Page X - 1 Approved - February 24, 2020 Appendix X Landscape Guidelines Bursage + Ambrosia deltoidea + Canyon Ragweed Ambrosia ambrosioides Catclaw Acacia / Wait-a-Minute Bush Acacia greggii / Senegalia greggii Catclaw Mimosa Mimosa aculeaticarpa var. -
Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List
Arizona Department of Water Resources Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Official Regulatory List for the Phoenix Active Management Area Fourth Management Plan Arizona Department of Water Resources 1110 West Washington St. Ste. 310 Phoenix, AZ 85007 www.azwater.gov 602-771-8585 Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Acknowledgements The Phoenix AMA list was prepared in 2004 by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) in cooperation with the Landscape Technical Advisory Committee of the Arizona Municipal Water Users Association, comprised of experts from the Desert Botanical Garden, the Arizona Department of Transporation and various municipal, nursery and landscape specialists. ADWR extends its gratitude to the following members of the Plant List Advisory Committee for their generous contribution of time and expertise: Rita Jo Anthony, Wild Seed Judy Mielke, Logan Simpson Design John Augustine, Desert Tree Farm Terry Mikel, U of A Cooperative Extension Robyn Baker, City of Scottsdale Jo Miller, City of Glendale Louisa Ballard, ASU Arboritum Ron Moody, Dixileta Gardens Mike Barry, City of Chandler Ed Mulrean, Arid Zone Trees Richard Bond, City of Tempe Kent Newland, City of Phoenix Donna Difrancesco, City of Mesa Steve Priebe, City of Phornix Joe Ewan, Arizona State University Janet Rademacher, Mountain States Nursery Judy Gausman, AZ Landscape Contractors Assn. Rick Templeton, City of Phoenix Glenn Fahringer, Earth Care Cathy Rymer, Town of Gilbert Cheryl Goar, Arizona Nurssery Assn. Jeff Sargent, City of Peoria Mary Irish, Garden writer Mark Schalliol, ADOT Matt Johnson, U of A Desert Legum Christy Ten Eyck, Ten Eyck Landscape Architects Jeff Lee, City of Mesa Gordon Wahl, ADWR Kirti Mathura, Desert Botanical Garden Karen Young, Town of Gilbert Cover Photo: Blooming Teddy bear cholla (Cylindropuntia bigelovii) at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monutment. -
Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Phase II Report
Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Phase II Report By Dr. Terri Hildebrand Southern Utah University, Cedar City, UT and Dr. Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting, Kanab, UT Colorado Plateau Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit Agreement # H1200-09-0005 1 May 2012 Prepared for Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Southern Utah University National Park Service Mojave Network TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Introduction . 4 Study Area . 6 History and Setting . 6 Geology and Associated Ecoregions . 6 Soils and Climate . 7 Vegetation . 10 Previous Botanical Studies . 11 Methods . 17 Results . 21 Discussion . 28 Conclusions . 32 Acknowledgments . 33 Literature Cited . 34 Figures Figure 1. Location of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 5 Figure 2. Ecoregions and 2010-2011 collection sites in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 8 Figure 3. Soil types and 2010-2011 collection sites in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 9 Figure 4. Increase in the number of plant taxa confirmed as present in Grand Canyon- Parashant National Monument by decade, 1900-2011 . 13 Figure 5. Southern Utah University students enrolled in the 2010 Plant Anatomy and Diversity course that collected during the 30 August 2010 experiential learning event . 18 Figure 6. 2010-2011 collection sites and transportation routes in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 22 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Tables Table 1. Chronology of plant-collecting efforts at Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument . 14 Table 2. Data fields in the annotated checklist of the flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument (Appendices A, B, C, and D) . -
A Rapid Biological and Ecological Inventory and Assessment of the Cajon Bonito Watershed, Sonora, Mexico
A Rapid Biological and Ecological Inventory and Assessment of the Cajon Bonito Watershed, Sonora, Mexico. PartII: Using the Variable Transect Item Type Article Authors Hunt, Robert; Anderson, Walter Publisher University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Journal Desert Plants Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 29/09/2021 07:58:59 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/555882 Variable Transect Hunt and Anderson 3 (Tenneson 1998; CI 1997) and Rapid Biological Inventories A Rapid Biological and Ecological [RBI] (FMNH 2004). One of these new field methods, the Inventory and Assessment of the variable transect, has been used for inventories in neotropical forests with very high biodiversity values and complex arrays Cajon Bonito Watershed, Sonora, of habitats. The variable transect requires few tools and equipment. Unlike many area-based plot methods, the Mexico. Part II: Using the variable transect's size dimensions are determined by a set number of individuals to be sampled in predetermined plant Variable Transect classes. It can provide a high-quality snapshot of a plant community, its species and its community structure. These Robert Hunt data are enough to describe richness, abundance, and diversity and to make comparisons among different sites. M.A. Environmental Studies Prescott College A rapid inventory and assessment was conducted in the Cajon Prescott, Arizona 86303 Bonito watershed in northeast Sonora, Mexico, using variable transects for the plant inventories. The method was employed Walt Anderson in its original form as related by its developer, Robin Foster of the Field Museum of Natural History (personal Environmental Studies Program communication 1998). -
Plant Associations Woodlands.Pdf
United States Department of Agriculture Plant Associations Forest Service of Arizona and Southwestern Region New Mexico Volume 2: Woodlands The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, and marital or familial status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact the USDA Office of Communications at 202-720-2791. To file a complaint, write the Secretary of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250 or call 1-800-245- 6340 (voice) or 202-720-1127 (TTY). USDA is an equal employment opportunity employer. Plant Associations of Arizona and New Mexico Volume 2: Woodlands An Update of the USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region Habitat Typing Guides September 1996 Revised July 1997 Table of Contents - Volume 2 Table of Contents .............................................................................................. i Acknowledgements .......................................................................................... ii Preface .............................................................................................................. iii Introduction ........................................................................................................1 Format Notes for Plant Association Descriptions ..............................................3 -
Prescott Area Plant List Bulletin #32A
Prescott Area Plant List Bulletin #32A Landscape Trees 9/6/05 Drought Height Width Scientific Name Common Name Comments Tolerance (feet) (feet) Abies concolor White Fir somewhat 60 30 Short lived, some unknown disease problems encountered Acer negundo Box Elder none 50 50 Nice deciduous tree, female trees attract box elder bugs Acer palmatum Japanese Maple none 20 20 Many named varieties with unusual characteristics Acer plantanoides Norway Maple none 50 50 Subject to aphids, may not perform well in wind and alkaline soils Acer rubrum Red Maple none 40 40 Reddish twigs, red fall color Acer saccharinum Silver Maple none 60 60 Large tree, have seen trunk damage that may have been caused by spring freeze Acer saccharum Sugar Maple none 50 50 Source of maple sugar Ailanthus altissima Tree of Heaven very 40 20 Invasive Species – DO NOT PLANT Albizia julibrissin Mimosa somewhat 30 40 Fluffy pink flowers, flat topped Betula nigra River Birch none 40 25 Darker flaky bark, attractive foliage White bark, attractive foliage, good alternative to aspen because of fewer Betula pendula European White Birch none 30 20 diseases Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar somewhat 60 30 Rich green foliage in flat sprays, wood smells like pencils Catalpa speciosa Western Catalpa somewhat 40 40 Large heart-shaped leaves, attractive flowers and bark Cedrus atlantica Atlas Cedar somewhat 50 30 Shorter needles than Deodar Cedar, more erect leader Cedrus deodara Deodar Cedar somewhat 60 40 Droopy leader, softer texture than Atlas Cedar Celtis occidentalis Hackberry somewhat -
Steve Parr, Mgr. Colorado Environmental Plant Center Meeker
Natural Resources Conservation Service West National Technology Support Center 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Ste. 1000 Portland, Oregon 97232 Phone: 503-273-2427 FAX: 503-273-2401 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUBJECT: Plant Release Packet Review DATE: July 24, 2008 TO: Steve Parr, Mgr. FILE CODE: 190-18 Colorado Environmental Plant Center Meeker, Colorado The plant release committee has reviewed the Longridge Germplasm Utah serviceberry release packet and determined, based on the information provided to us, that 13 points should be awarded for the release (see attachment). The committee recommends that you submit the packet to your cooperators for signatures after making suggested modifications to the Plant Guide and brochure and forward it on to National Headquarters (NHQ) for the final signature. You will need to include a copy of this letter when submitting the packet to NHQ for verification that the release packet has been reviewed by the plant release committee. /s/ JAMES A BRIGGS Plant Materials Specialist cc: Pat Davey, PMS, Lakewood, Colo Robert Escheman, National Program Leader-Plant Materials, NRCS, Washington, D.C. Joel Douglas, Plant Materials Specialist, CNTSC, NRCS, Ft. Worth, Texas John Englert, PMC Manager, National Plant Materials Center, NRCS, Beltsville, Maryland UPPER COLORADO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANT CENTER MEEKER, COLORADO and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE LAKEWOOD, COLORADO and COLORADO STATE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION FORT COLLINS, COLORADO NOTICE OF RELEASE OF LONG RIDGE GERMPLASM UTAH SERVICEBERRY Upper Colorado Environmental Plant Center (UCEPC), the Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the Colorado State Agricultural Experiment Station announce the naming and release of Long Ridge Germplasm Utah serviceberry (Amelanchier utahensis Koehne). -
Native Plant Society of New Mexico Albuquerque Chapter ______
Albuquerque Chapter Native Plant Society of New Mexico 2017 Spring Issue Page 1 Native Plant Society of New Mexico Albuquerque Chapter ______________________________________________________ The dazzling red tepals and anthers of spring-blooming Claret Cup cactus (Echinocereus coccineus) attract hummingbirds migrating across the deserts. Photo © George O. Miller From the Editor Featured this quarter are descriptions of two of the And the March wind blows. oldest native plant nurseries in Albuquerque: By Diane Stevenson, newsletter editor Plants of the Southwest, and the Pueblo of Santa Ana Garden Center. I’m sure you’ll be THANK YOU for the many hours NPSNM inspired to visit them to add a few native plants to members, presenters, and area landscape your gardens, especially after reading George designers spent planning, creating, and hosting the Miller’s ‘Spring Pollinator Welcome Mat’, Carolyn two-day Pollinator Habitat Workshop and Design Dodson’s feature on the Banana Yucca, and Tom Lab workshop and half-day design lab! Success! Stewart’s article, ‘Grow Your Own.’ The many activities and events planned are 4 -1/2 pages long. A BIG THANK YOU also goes to all the participants interested in pollinator habitat! You are Once the hot days hit, keep cool in the shade and helping to spread the good word about pollinators, read those books on native plants, butterflies, and especially the great bee and butterfly talks at the bees featured in last quarter’s newsletter or try this February workshop. quarter’s books reviewed by Donald Heinze and George Miller. “Surf” the internet sites you’ve been Spring sure blew in like a lion. -
B. Plant List See Appendix a (City of Sedona Approved Landscape Plant List); LDC Section 5.6 (Landscaping)
Design 2.4 | Landscaping B. Plant List See Appendix A (City of Sedona Approved Landscape Plant List); LDC Section 5.6 (Landscaping) (1) Intent a. The City of Sedona Approved Landscape Plant List (Appendix A) is intended for use by development projects that must comply with the LDC Section 5.6 (Landscaping). b. Residents may use the list as a reference when choosing plants for their home. (2) Purpose The purpose of the Plant List is to apply the Community Plan vision to the landscape component of the built environment, specifically the Sense of Place, Environmental Stewardship, and Sustainability goals. a. Sense of Place The built landscape can and should mirror Sedona’s unique natural environment. Landscaping is an important and very visible component of the built environment, especially in commercial developments seen from the highway. The use of native plants is intended to blend the built landscape with the surrounding natural landscape by incorporating the same plants. b. Sustainability and Water Conservation Maintaining a sustainable environment is a fundamental goal of the community. How this relates to landscaping is the desire for a healthy, diverse, and productive ecosystem that can be sustained over time without depleting or impacting natural, cultural, or economic resources. (3) Listed Plants See Appendix A The Plant List (Appendix A) features plants that are considered water-wise or low water use plants, unless listed as riparian. a. The plant list includes three categories: native, adaptive, and riparian plants. A separate list includes invasive weeds. b. Given the LDC requirement regarding the minimum size of shrubs, the Plant List does not include shrubs or cacti that are typically less than 2’ in height. -
BERBERIDACEAE -- Barberry Family
BERBERIDACEAE -- Barberry Family Scientific Name: Common Name: Berberis haematocarpa Red barberry, algerita Size: Color: 1 – 4 m Yellow flowers, red-purple berries Description: Notes: Erect shrub with rigid, spineless branches, often The bright yellow flowers of barberry bushes found in groups. Leaves alternate, odd-pinnate resemble miniature daffodils. The dull, stiff, with 3 – 9 (commonly 5) lanceolate to ovate spiny leaves make barberry easy to recognize. leaflets with 5 – 10 triangular, spine-tipped The species name haematocarpa comes from lobes or teeth. Terminal leaflet 1.5 – 3.8 cm the Greek haema, “blood”, and carpos, “fruit”, long, 5 – 10 mm wide, 2 – 5 times as long as in reference to the juicy, red berries. Red wide, stalked. Flowers perfect, in loose clusters barberry is an alternate host to the parasitic of 3 – 7 at branch tips. Sepals 6, distinct, wheat rust Puccinia graminis. Barberry blooms yellow, in 2 series. Petals 6, rounded, erect. from April into June between 3000 and 7000 ft. Stamens 6. Pistil 1. Fruit of round, solid, juicy, purplish red berries 5 – 8 mm in diameter. New Mexico Native 131 BERBERIDACEAE -- Barberry Family Scientific Name: Common Name: Berberis repens Creeping Mahonia, Oregon grape Size: Color: 10 - 20 cm Yellow flowers, blue berries Description: Notes: Synonym: Mahonia repens. Thomas Nuttall named this plant for his friend Perennial with woody, trailing to ascending and colleague Bernard MacMahon (1755-1816), stems without spines. Leaves alternate, odd- an Irish immigrant who operated a plant nursery pinnate with 3 - 7 ovate to elliptic leaflets 1 - 7 in Philadelphia and helped introduce decorative cm long, 1 - 5 cm wide, edges with 12 - 40 gardening to the United States. -
Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region
Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region (VERSION 3) NEIL SNOW Herbarium Pacificum Bernice P. Bishop Museum 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, HI 96817 [email protected] Suggested citation: Snow, N. 2009. Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region (Version 3). 316 pp. Retrievable from the Colorado Native Plant Society (http://www.conps.org/plant_lists.html). The author retains the rights irrespective of its electronic posting. Please circulate freely. 1 Snow, N. January 2009. Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region. (Version 3). Dedication To all who work on behalf of the conservation of species and ecosystems. Abbreviated Table of Contents Fern Allies and Ferns.........................................................................................................12 Gymnopserms ....................................................................................................................19 Angiosperms ......................................................................................................................21 Amaranthaceae ............................................................................................................23 Apiaceae ......................................................................................................................31 Asteraceae....................................................................................................................38 Boraginaceae ...............................................................................................................98