DOCSLIB.ORG

Rananim Vol 2 No 1 Feb 1994

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The fournal of the D.H. Lawrence Society of Australia ISSN No: 1059-9658 Vol2, No. 1, February 1gg4 LAT.]NCH ONTHE GRASS he official launch of the D.H. stood in open grass-lawn, and Law- La* rence Society ofAustralia, rence and Frieda could hardly have held in the Sydney Botanic missed seeing it as, like their fictional Gardens on Sunday November2l, I 993, counterparts in Kangaroo, Richard shoued that the Society has come a Lovatt Somers and his wife Harriett, lons u ar since its modest beginnings in they strolled back to Macquarie Street Thinoul a rear belore. across Palace Gardens from the direc- At that nteering. in the Thirroul tion of the "fortified" Conservatorium Municipai Libran'. a srnall group of 11 of Music. Larvrence enthusiasls formed a com- The Pavilion was also chosen for mittee to o\ersce thc drawing up of the the meeting because it is almost oppo- constitution and ro look at the possibil- site the site where once stood a "more- ity of bringin,c our a Society journal. or-less" expensive boarding house run Twelve months on. the Society's by a Mrs Scott. Robert Darroch sug- Lawrence and Lady Ottoline membership has grorvn to more than gests in his D.H. Layvrence in Australia Morrellat Garsington (detail) - turn to page 10 50, many of whom were at the inaugural (1981), that this may have been where meeting in the Gardens, and the first the Lawrences stayed during their "day or issue of Rananim, a journal dedicated to two" in Sydney before they moved ;' contEht$:' "'1;';";' encouraging interest in Lawrence, has down to Thirroul. been launched. Thc inaugural meeting was picnic- The Spirit of the,Place ' The inaugural meeting had some style, and the Botanic Gardens auth- ,"*l What Walter serious business to carry out. but it was orities kindly gave permission for a Knew :3 also an informal and entertainins social celebratory glass o1 champagne, but By Steamship to Rananim 4, occasion. asked that the affair should not go on The Barber of Thirioul 5 In line with the committee's feeling for too long, as it might run into u,ed- that some physical link dings, for which the Rose Garden is a should be main- the Cafe HoVal ' '10 tained, whcre possible, with the actual favourite venue. In fact, the meeting , A Literary House settings described in Kangaroo, the continued well into the latter part of a That Has Been Preserved 15 meeting was held in what is known to brilliant Sydney afternoon, without dis- Sydney people as the Rose Garden turbing any brides or grooms. Was Willie Struthers My Uncle Jock? 16 Pavilion of the Botanic Gardens. Formal business included the adop- A little research revels that its cor- tion of thc constitution drawn up by Frank Hardy's Testimony 21 rect name is the Palace Gardens Shelter, legal oflicer Stephen O'Connor (with Letters 22 and it was erectcd in 1897, twin of useful help irom the D.H. Lawrence Forthcoming Events 22 another designed for Centennial Park. Society of the UK) and the appoinr ,,, Bits ,'i' 23 In 1922,long before thc Rose Garden, it (cottt'd p2) Paaatz* b The Spirit of the Place A series of paintings on the theme of D.H. Lawrence at Thirroul by Australian artist and member Gary Shead has been on display at the Art Gallery of NSW over the past few months. Shead, whose portrait of publisher Tom Thompson won last year's Archibald Prize for portrait painting, has been fascinated and inspired by Lawrence's Australian period, and several years ago he was responsible for a major work of art depicting Wyewurk, the now-famous diptych which he painted with the late Brett Whiteley. The D.H. Laurence Shead's new series took the various images associated with Societg of Hustralia Lawrence, Thirroul and the novel Kangaroo inlo a larger realm. The series, which is the subject of a book that accompanied the COMMITTEE: exhibition, was well received by both critics and the public, and Chairman: Prof. Raymond Southall was just the latest example of the on-going inspiration that Law- Secretary: Dr. Beverlcy Burgr-nann rence's time in Australia provides for artists, writers, poets and Vicc-President: Robert Darroch musicians of the present day. Treasurer: Stephen O'Connor As the exhibition drew to a close, two South Coast poets, Membcrship Secrctary: Rullels John Geoffrey Sykes and Greg held reading poetry Editor. Rananim: John Lacey O'Brien, a of their Publishcr, Rananim: Sandra Jobson at the Art Gallery, with readings from Kangaroo, (by actor Arthur Editorirl Comtnirtee. Rrnanim: Dignam) in the room displaying the Shead pictures. Robert Darroch, Dr. Paul Eggcrt, The event was called "lmages of Place - D.H. Lawrence in Sandra Jobson, Margaret Jones. Australia" and we include, with the kind permission of the author, Address: one of the poems read at the occasion. PO Box 100 Millers Point. NSW 2000. Fax: (02) 982 7805. Letters and contributions to Rananim Evening at Thirroul are very welcome. Pleasc send to the above address, with your name, evening sea of evening light going pale address and telephone number (and, fair of evening light faintly glazed if possible, fax). with yellow eastern sky a glow of rose and smoke blue band - sit at the edge of bush as twilight falls and look (cont'dfrom p l) down on the township scattered Launch out into wide grass road then bush on the Grass rvhere wide scattering lights fizz and a frail transluscent net of light blinks in random among black streets ment of a committee fbr 1 993-94. Mem- the beauty of the known bership Secretary, John Ruff'els, cn- keeping back all alone rolled new members on the spot, and the sea the bush the sky as they drift into dark indifference each received a free copy of Kangaroo, far off far off roll the knolls supplied by Tom Thompson of Angus of the planet of indifference & Robertson, publishers. the night of becoming tolls Not the least achievement of the day, however, was to promote a re- - Geoffrey Sykes (after warding interaction between agroup oi Kangaroo) by D.H. Lawrence people with a common interest, but whose other lives shorv a rclreshing diversity: the Society's membership in- cludes writcrs, lawyers, painters, post- men, teachers, students, academics, If you are able to scnd your article on a tloppy disc (PC or Mac), it would be vcry helpful. Please contact the publisher, Sandra surlers. railway enthusiasts. nurses. Jobson, to establish style details and disc formatting. public servants, merchant bankers and Tel: (02) 971 5013. retirees. - Margaret Jones Razaain What Walter Knew missing from the jigsaw. But the the time. However, what Wilbur following piece of information, of Wright then said is a revelation serendipitous provenance, may be of some importance.l of interest. Wright went on to tell Yeend he name of Walter Smale In October last year the of a rather odd connection be- (W.S.) Friend and that of archivist of The King's School at tween this "pseudo-military his family have become Parramatta, Peter Yeend, wrote movement" and a well-known increasingly important to those me a note about a piece of infor- work of literature. Yeend's notes interested in the historical basis of mation that had been lying in his of the interview state: "..in the the paramilitary Diggers de- files for the past 19 years. (The same conversation he [Wright] scribed in D.H. Lawrence's archives, which include biographi- said that Lawrence, the Lady Kangaroo. The Friends - a cal files on former King's School Chatterley's Lover author, had prominent Sydney commercial boys, are quite famous within the used the material about the above family with extensive pastoral Australian history trade. No one, in his Ast'n novel Kangaroo". interests - did not figure in Robert however, had ever suspected that Yeend's notes say that Walter Darroch's 1981 work D.H. they might contain evidence about Friend had told Wilbur Wright Ltutrence in Australia, but eight Australia's most persistent literary about this in a conversation - vears later they were mentioned puzzle.) which must have occurred some rn Joe Davrs's D.H. Lawrence at This particular piece of infor- years previously - at "the Club". Tlirroul. mation was in the file of an Old Wright did not make clear As Davis points out, a prop- Boy, N. H. Wright. Known as what club he was referring to, but ert), owned by the Friends in Wilbur Wright, he was the Yeend assumed it was either the Craig Street. Thirroul, (on which brother-in-law of Walter Friend. Imperial Service Club or the there was a house called A woolbroker, Wilbur had retired Schools Club. At the time, Yeend Wyewunie) lay, across the road to Bowral where he pursued his did not question Wright more from Wyervurk. the seaside literary endeavours, which in- closely, for the significance of the bungalow that Larvrence and cluded writing for his school's information was not apparent to Frieda rented in 1922. The Friend magazine. him then. Today, however, what family not only owned this and On29}lay 1974, Yeend, in Wright told Yeend has a great other property in Thirroul, but the course of collecting informa- deal of significance. Not only did also had property at Collaroy in tion on TKS Old Boys, went Walter Friend reveal that he was Sydney where, Darroch claims, down to Bowral to interview connected with the Old Guard, he Lawrence went on the day after Wilbur Wright.
Recommended publications
  • AWAR of INDIVIDUALS: Bloomsbury Attitudes to the Great

    AWAR of INDIVIDUALS: Bloomsbury Attitudes to the Great

    2 Bloomsbury What were the anti-war feelings chiefly expressed outside ‘organised’ protest and not under political or religious banners – those attitudes which form the raison d’être for this study? As the Great War becomes more distant in time, certain actions and individuals become greyer and more obscure whilst others seem to become clearer and imbued with a dash of colour amid the sepia. One thinks particularly of the so-called Bloomsbury Group.1 Any overview of ‘alter- native’ attitudes to the war must consider the responses of Bloomsbury to the shadows of doubt and uncertainty thrown across page and canvas by the con- flict. Despite their notoriety, the reactions of the Bloomsbury individuals are important both in their own right and as a mirror to the similar reactions of obscurer individuals from differing circumstances and backgrounds. In the origins of Bloomsbury – well known as one of the foremost cultural groups of the late Victorian and Edwardian periods – is to be found the moral and aesthetic core for some of the most significant humanistic reactions to the war. The small circle of Cambridge undergraduates whose mutual appreciation of the thoughts and teachings of the academic and philosopher G.E. Moore led them to form lasting friendships, became the kernel of what would become labelled ‘the Bloomsbury Group’. It was, as one academic described, ‘a nucleus from which civilisation has spread outwards’.2 This rippling effect, though tem- porarily dammed by the keenly-felt constrictions of the war, would continue to flow outwards through the twentieth century, inspiring, as is well known, much analysis and interpretation along the way.
  • Holmi Postájából Móritz Mátyás: a Tisztes Hátrány • 1070 Bán Zsófia: Egyben (Balassa Péterrôl) • 1071 Radnóti Sándor: Balassa Péter Halálára (1947–2003) • 1073

    Holmi Postájából Móritz Mátyás: a Tisztes Hátrány • 1070 Bán Zsófia: Egyben (Balassa Péterrôl) • 1071 Radnóti Sándor: Balassa Péter Halálára (1947–2003) • 1073

    Szerkeszti: Réz Pál (fôszerkesztô), Radnóti Sándor (bírálat), Várady Szabolcs (vers), Závada Pál (széppróza), Fodor Géza, Szalai Júlia Szerkesztôbizottság: Bodor Ádám, Dávidházi Péter, Domokos Mátyás, Göncz Árpád, Kocsis Zoltán, Lator László, Ludassy Mária, Rakovszky Zsuzsa, Vásárhelyi Júlia. Tördelôszerkesztô: Környei Anikó. A szöveget gondozta: Zsarnay Erzsébet TARTALOM Lôcsei Péter: „Kedves Fôtisztelendô Úr” (Weöres Sándor levelei Székely Lászlóhoz) • 955 Falcsik Mária: Egy utazás képei • 985 Alkaioszi • 986 Kôrizs Imre: Karácsonyi ódi • 987 Non omnia moriar • 988 Az élet (már megint • 990 Térey János: A gyermek • 990 Göncz Árpád: A veszélyes és életet adó szó • 992 Katherine Mansfield leveleibôl (I) (Mesterházi Mónika válogatásában, fordításában és jegyzeteivel) • 996 Gombár Csaba: Leonard Woolfról • 1019 Leonard Woolf: Újrakezdés (Vallasek Júlia fordítása) • 1022 Szabó T. Anna: Az erô • 1036 Fehér • 1037 Totem • 1038 Csengery Kristóf: Köd, bot, kutya, kiáltás • 1039 Fogmûtét után • 1040 Egy megrendelés története • 1041 Belsô kalandok • 1041 Halasi Zoltán: Anód-katód • 1042 Mi négyen • 1043 954 • Tartalom FIGYELÔ Nagy András: Délvidéki aranytalanság (Gion Nándor: Aranyat talált) • 1044 Csûrös Miklós: „(A nehezén túl vagyunk? A neheze hátravan?)” (Szilágyi István: Hollóidô) • 1047 Kálmán C. György: Árnyképek (Kántor Péter: Lóstaféta) • 1055 Ferencz Gyôzô–Bodor Béla: Két bírálat egy könyvrôl (Nádasdy Ádám: A rend, amit csinálok) • 1059 Fogarassy Miklós: „Ami fölfénylett épp odabent...” (Bodor Béla: Ragtime a Vérnôszô Barommal) • 1066 A Holmi postájából Móritz Mátyás: A tisztes hátrány • 1070 Bán Zsófia: Egyben (Balassa Péterrôl) • 1071 Radnóti Sándor: Balassa Péter halálára (1947–2003) • 1073 Megjelenik havonta. Felelôs kiadó: Réz Pál. Vörösmarty Társaság Levélcím: HOLMI c/o Réz Pál, 1137 Budapest, Jászai Mari tér 4/A Terjeszti a Nemzeti Hírlapkereskedelmi Rt.
  • Recorder Vol. 1 No. 2 September 1964

    Recorder Vol. 1 No. 2 September 1964

    oa ros Recorder <> MELBOURNE BRANCH AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF LABOUR HISTORY Vol 1. No. 2. September 19SL EDITORIAL productionDrnfinot-inS ,?,was not+ commencedall we would with wish the for. previous This issueissue andwill the come standard through of production^'^'^^ Letter. Cost is a factor in the andQnr^ anyon^r ??++little will helpfpom to Othergenerate members collective v;ill he activity,v/elcomed immediatelyin return vou may secure a "missing linlc" long sought. x y, la reiiurn you Street,Q+v,^ + Moonee Ponds. should he sent to S. xMerrifield, 81 VVaverley THE ItNfTERNATIONALS 28/q/lfifih^«t^Q? founding of the First International on in humanhnmon >.?history + which ^have ^ ^resulted J^ondon. from It this.is hard' to SiSSess the changes 10711871 were other signs of future17S2, events. 1830, 181+8 and the later Commune of tnto ■Pnr.mform an associationsarly _ as 1839, in London,German worlcnen expelled from Paris attempted giveffivc. ao lead to anotherMarx and efx.ort Engels in produced international the "Communist co-operation. Manifesto" to ff nvp ininternational London at the meetings, time of thetwo 1862 on 28A/1863Exhibition and Government\ in supportSt.James of the Hall Polish demanded insurrection the intervention agains? CzLis? hy the pSIsifEnglish Classes , rmed in I800 oy the karquessMaterial Townshend, Elevation gave aof furtherthe Industrial lead, P^^liifii^inry meetings in June and July were followed hv thP l5/7/18ys"°*^®'' ''•®- dtlesatos only was held at Philadelphia on in Ootobe5°1881°Sto X ao Ohor?nd^??nal?rw''"r?^'"Jonur anu iinally was held in Paris on lh/7/1889.
  • Gilbert Cannan (1884–1955) Mary Cannan (1868–1950) Artists Who Visited: Mark Gertler, Dora Carrington the Windmill, Rays Hill, Cholesbury HP5 2UJ

    Gilbert Cannan (1884–1955) Mary Cannan (1868–1950) Artists Who Visited: Mark Gertler, Dora Carrington the Windmill, Rays Hill, Cholesbury HP5 2UJ

    Gilbert Cannan (1884–1955) Mary Cannan (1868–1950) Artists who visited: Mark Gertler, Dora Carrington The Windmill, Rays Hill, Cholesbury HP5 2UJ The artists Cannan was a novelist and dramatist. He married Mary (a former actress) in 1910 after she was divorced from her previous husband, the author J.M. Barrie, because of her affair with Cannan. The Cannans moved in an artistic and intellectual circle and many of their writer and artist friends came to stay at the windmill or rented homes in the nearby villages. These included Mark Gertler, Dora Carrington, Lytton Strachey, D.H. Lawrence, Katherine Mansfield, Compton Mackenzie and John Drinkwater. Gilbert Cannan produced a lot of work during his time at the windmill and some of the other visitors referred to either the countryside or people they had met there in some of their work. Mark Gertler painted several paintings during his many visits, one of which, The Merry-Go- Round, is probably his most famous work while another is his painting of the windmill itself, called Gilbert Cannan and his Mill. The house The Grade II windmill is located down a track off Rays Hill, Cholesbury, a small hilltop village approximately 6 km north-west of Chesham and 5km south of Tring in the Chiltern Hills (AONB). There have been windmills on the site since the 17th century, but the current building was constructed in 1883 and an attached grain store was later added. The miller lived in the adjacent mill house until the mill ceased operation in 1912. The property was occupied by the Cannans from 1913 to 1916.
  • Communism and the Australian Labour Movement 1920-1955

    Communism and the Australian Labour Movement 1920-1955

    Robin Gollan RevolutionariesGollan • and ReformistsRobin Communism has played a central part in Australian political nightmares for over half a century. Yet it has received scant serious attention comparable in scope and perspec­ tive with this work. This book places the Communist Party of Australia firmly in its political context, national and international, from the 1920s to the mid-1950s. It is important in its in­ sights into the general history of Australian radicalism; its contribution to Australian history, especially labour history; and its placing of radical Australian history in a Communism and the Australian Labour world context. It is written from the per­ spective of one who joined the Communist Movement 1920-1955 Party of Australia because it seemed the only party 'committed to the struggle for socialism and against fascism' and who left it because Robin Gollan this 'no longer seemed the case'. Its breadth, perceptiveness, and understanding com­ mend it to all people concerned w ith the con­ tinuing political struggles of the Right, the Left, and the Centre. Robin Gollan RevolutionariesGollan • and ReformistsRobin Communism has played a central part in Australian political nightmares for over half a century. Yet it has received scant serious attention comparable in scope and perspec­ tive with this work. This book places the Communist Party of Australia firmly in its political context, national and international, from the 1920s to the mid-1950s. It is important in its in­ sights into the general history of Australian radicalism; its contribution to Australian history, especially labour history; and its placing of radical Australian history in a Communism and the Australian Labour world context.
  • Forging a Communist Party for Australia: 1920–1923

    Forging a Communist Party for Australia: 1920–1923

    Section 1 Forging a Communist Party for Australia: 1920–1923 The documents in this section cover the period from April 1920 to late 1923, that is, from before the inaugural conference of Australian communists to a time when the CPA had emerged as the Australian section of the Comintern, but was still dealing with issues of unity, and was coming to terms with the realities of being a section of a world revolutionary party. The main theme of this section is organizational unity, because that is what the Australian communists and their Comintern colleagues saw as the chief priority. As the ECCI wrote to the feuding Australian communists in June 1922: `The existence of two small groups, amidst a seething current of world shaking events, engaged almost entirely in airing their petty differences, instead of unitedly plunging into the current and mastering it, is not only a ridiculous and shameful spectacle, but also a crime committed against the working class movement' (see Document 15). The crucial unity meeting finally occurred in July that year. The CAAL documents reveal that the Comintern played a larger role in forging the CPA than has previously been thought. There were supporters of the Bolshevik Revolution in Australia, and people who wanted to create a party like the Bolsheviks', to be sure, but Petr Simonov, Paul Freeman and Aleksandr Zuzenko helped to bring the at first waryÐand later squabblingÐcurrents of former Wobblies, former ASP socialists, and former worker radicals together. Indeed the ASP believed that it (the ASP) was, or ought to be, the Australian communist party, and it somewhat begrudgingly went through the unity process demanded by the Comintern.
  • CFP-KM-Conference-20

    CFP-KM-Conference-20

    Katherine Mansfield and the ‘Blooms Berries’ An international conference organized by the Katherine Mansfield Society, to be held at the Newberry Library in Chicago, Illinois, USA 28-30 May 2015 Keynote Address: Professor Sydney Janet Kaplan University of Washington In his eagerness to establish Katherine Mansfield’s place among her peers, John Middleton Murry sometimes published work that she, herself, would have rejected. Likewise, the extent of his culling of her letters and notebooks glossed over Mansfield’s complex personality and relationships, elements of her life that provide a context for better understanding her fiction. This ‘Mansfield Myth’ made her appear out of touch with the social and cultural upheaval of her time. Having generally been relegated to the fringe of literary modernism during her lifetime, especially among the influential ‘Blooms Berries’, as Mansfield referred to them in a letter to Lady Ottoline Morrell on 15 August 1917, she nevertheless worked her way into enviable positions of prestige in some key literary magazines, and had become well known as a writer by the end of her life. It is as a member of the social fringe, though, that Mansfield becomes the most intriguing. As Sydney Janet Kaplan demonstrates in her seminal book, Katherine Mansfield and the Origins of Modernist Fiction, Mansfield brings a different perspective – and, like Virginia Woolf, provides a corrective – to the dominant, male-centered version of modernism. Likewise, as a colonial, Mansfield remained free of the traditions that haunted most of the Bloomsbury group, including their ‘anxiety of influence’. In this, Mansfield demonstrated herself as more ‘modern’ than some of her contemporaries; having less ‘tradition’ to overcome, she was able to adopt a style that was unselfconscious of influence.
  • Katherine Mansfield Leveleiből

    Katherine Mansfield Leveleiből

    996 • Katherine Mansfield leveleibôl (I) szág lakosságának többségére kiterjedô gazdasági gondok és az azokból következô tár- sadalmi problémák szülték és szülik. Ezek ellen pedig a köztársasági elnök szinte te- hetetlen. Úgy éreztem, Magyarország lakosságának többsége mégis megbízott ben- nem és a szavamban, talán azért, mert úgy érezte: magam is egy vagyok sokuk közül. Úgy, mert sokat próbált életemnek hála, tudta, hogy a bôrömön érzem a gondját. Amit meg is tudok fogalmazni. Tôlem telhetôen érthetôen és emberi nyelven. Meg kell val- lanom, „elnöki” lelkiállapotom mindvégig skizofrén volt. Szorongva éreztem a tehe- tetlenségemet a fölém tornyosuló erôkkel szemben. Szorongva éreztem a „kiválasztott ember” felelôsségét, azét, aki kiválasztottsága ellenére nyitva tartja a szemét. És figyel – mindenekelôtt önmagára és mindarra, ami körülveszi. Arra a könyörtelen ellentétre, ami az ô elnöki tiszte adta szabadsága és az abból fa- kadó szigorú kötöttségek között fönnáll. És ismeri a hatalomvágy, az elôjogok kísérté- sét, de az efölött aratott gyôzelem örömét is. Be kell vallanom: elnökségem tíz éve alatt is mindvégig azzal a szándékkal gyûjtöt- tem az élményeket, hogy egyszer majd megírom. Szatírának? S élveztem, ha megmerítkezhettem egy jó, semmire nem kötelezô intellektuális be- szélgetés langyos vizében. Boldog voltam, ha egy-egy kurta politikai pengeváltásban megéreztem a fölényemet. És szomorú, ha azt vettem észre, hogy néha már a legbensôbb önmagamat is „ját- szani” kényszerülök. Mindvégig féltem, hogy fél tôlem valaki. Annak viszont örültem, ha szerettek. De utáltam, ha hiúságon voltam kénytelen rajtakapni magam: tehát ki nem állhat- tam, ha szépeket mondtak. Rólam és nekem. Igaz: azt is utáltam, ha rosszat. Egyszóval, ha akartam, sem tudtam más lenni, mint önmagam.
  • Malcolm Ellis: Labour Historian? Spy?

    Malcolm Ellis: Labour Historian? Spy?

    Malcolm Ellis: Labour Historian? Spy? Andrew Moore UW8, Macarthur When, on New Year's Day 1952, Sir John Ferguson, the eminent in 1984 it is important for left historians to understand their enemy. 10 bibliographer and Industrial Commission judge, wrote to his friend and colleague, M.H. Ellis, the anticommunist historian, he evinced The making of an anticommunist sentiments with which many labour historians would agree. Ferguson Considering how comfortably- in middle Iife- M.H. Ellis fitted into knew of EIlis's practice of collecting left-wing literature, especially the plush clubs and institutions of Sydney's elite- given the depth of pamphlets published by the Communist Party of Australia (CPA). the veteran journalist's network into the commanding heights of Ferguson was concerned that these should be preserved, perhaps, he Canberra's conservative political circles, some aspects of his suggested, as part of his large collection ofAustraliana lodged at the background are incongruous. The circumstances of his birth and National Library of Australia. If Ellis acceded to this request, upbringing were plebeian. While Ellis's father was the product of an Ferguson advised, future students of 'sociology' would have access ancient Norman Irish family, when Ellis was born, Thomas Ellis to a 'large body of material covering every period which may touch was a farm labourer and battling small selector in Queensland. In his thesis, e.g. the I.w.w. campaign .. .in N.S.W. was Lang right'.1 outback Queensland during the 1890s, Ellis's childhood playmates No doubt influenced by ongoing displays of personal regard from were mainly Aboriginal.
  • Simonov, Freeman and Zuzenko in Australia 1918-21

    Simonov, Freeman and Zuzenko in Australia 1918-21

    A Troika of Agitators: Three Comintern Liaison Agents in Australia, 1920-22 Whether Comrade Freeman is sick or whether he is clumsily concealing his hostile attitude to Soviet Russia and its leaders is hard to say, but to send a man like him on a responsible and dangerous assignment is risky in the highest degree.1 Thus wrote one of Paul Freeman’s close comrades, Alexander Zuzenko, in Moscow on 15 August 1920 while preparations were in train to send both men, recent deportees from Australia, back on a liaison mission for the Third International, to nurture the infant communist movement there. Comrade Simonoff was appointed consul-general in Australia … , dreaming perhaps of becoming an official of Soviet Russia, who would sit in an office issuing passports to departing Russians … and nothing more. Thus Zuzenko on 30 April 1920, describing the comrade-in-arms who had shared his hardships in the struggle for socialism in Queensland.2 Comrade Miller [Freeman] has merely acted out a Khlestakov role. … By his tactless behaviour he has done nothing but harm, wrote Peter Simonoff, the Bolshevik consul, from Sydney in April 1921, the day after Freeman’s departure from Sydney on completion of his clandestine Comintern assignment.3 Statements such as these do not suggest a harmonious working relationship among three prominent participants in the effort to establish Australian communism on a firm basis and position it for the rapid growth needed if Australia was to play its full part in the world revolution. Yet that was the aim which Zuzenko, Freeman and Simonoff earnestly aspired to achieve.
  • Our Unswerving Loyalty a Documentary Survey of Relations Between the Communist Party of Australia and Moscow, 1920–1940

    Our Unswerving Loyalty a Documentary Survey of Relations Between the Communist Party of Australia and Moscow, 1920–1940

    OUR UNSWERVING LOYALTY A documentary survey of relations between the Communist Party of Australia and Moscow, 1920–1940 OUR UNSWERVING LOYALTY A documentary survey of relations between the Communist Party of Australia and Moscow, 1920–1940 David W. Lovell and Kevin Windle (editors) Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/oul_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Our unswerving loyalty : a documentary survey of relations between the Communist Party of Australia and Moscow, 1920-1940 / editor David Lovell, Kevin Windle. ISBN: 9781921313950 (pbk.) 9781921313967 (web) Notes: Includes index. Bibliography. Subjects: Communist International. Communist Party of Australia. Communism--Australia. Australia--Politics and government--1901-1945. Soviet Union--Relations--Australia. Australia--Relations--Soviet Union. Other Authors/Contributors: Lovell, David W., 1956- Windle, Kevin, 1947- Dewey Number: 335.4230994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by Teresa Prowse Printed by University Printing Services, ANU This edition © 2008 ANU E Press Contents Preface and Acknowledgements vii Abbreviations ix Glossary of individuals, organizations and tactics xi Some key dates in the history of Australian communism to 1943 xxiii Dates of key Comintern meetings xxv The organization of the Comintern xxvii Reproducing the documents: some conventions xxix Notes on the texts and translations xxxi A note on currency xxxiii Piecing together the past: the Comintern, the CPA, and the archives 1 David W.
  • Australia's First Socialists

    Australia's First Socialists

    Australia’s First Socialists Jim McIlroy 2 Australia’s First Socialists Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................3 Beginnings ..........................................................................................................................5 Chartist influence — 5 l The Eureka Stockade — 7 l Democratic Association of Victoria — 10 l Australian Socialist League — 11 l William Lane — 13 l ‘State socialism’ — 15 l Movement in Victoria — 16 l Rapid growth — 17 l Internationalism — 19 The Industrial Workers of the World .............................................................21 US birthplace — 21 l IWW clubs in Australia — 22 l Chicago IWW 1910-14 — 24 l What the IWW stood for — 26 l Who were the Wobblies? — 28 l Challenge to racism — 30 l Supporting women workers — 31 l IWW organisation — 32 l Politics of ‘class war’ — 34 l Critique of Laborism — 35 l Direct industrial action — 37 l Opposing the war — 38 l Trial of the Sydney 12 — 42 l Banning the IWW — 43 Founding the Communist Party .........................................................................47 Fierce debate — 48 l 1920 conference — 49 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................51 © Resistance Books 2003 ISBN 187664639X Published by Resistance Books, 23 Abercrombie St, Chippendale NSW 2008, Australia Printed by El Faro Printing, 79 King St, Newtown NSW 2042, Australia Introduction