Community Health Centers: Opportunities and Challenges of Health Reform

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

kaiser I commission on S S U medicaid and the E uninsured August 2010 P A Community Health Centers: Opportunities and Challenges of Health Reform P E R Introduction The enactment of comprehensive health reform1 will bring about important changes to the health insurance and health care delivery systems. Community health centers2 will play a role in implementing many health reform provisions and in providing access to care for millions of Americans who will gain health insurance coverage under the law. To meet this new demand for services, particularly in underserved areas, the health reform law makes a significant investment in the expansion of health centers and also introduces important changes in health care delivery while strengthening efforts to improve community and population health. Health reform brings major shifts in the health insurance status of health center patients. Increasing access to affordable insurance, coupled with the law’s emphasis on greater clinical integration and health care innovation lays the groundwork for far-reaching changes over time in how health centers deliver care and develop affiliations with other providers as well as with community-wide prevention efforts. The transformation has already started. Most health centers once operated independently, but the advent of Medicaid managed care (which depends on networked providers) coupled with the growth of information technology has led to the formation of at least 83 health center networks.3 These networks allow multiple health center grantees to integrate financial and in some cases clinical services as well as develop their service capacity on a regional basis.4 Similarly, the growing proportion of patients with significant physical and mental health conditions, as well as the aging of the population, has led health centers to deepen the range of services they furnish and enter into increasingly comprehensive service delivery arrangements. Despite coverage expansions and improvements to the health system, health reform will leave an estimated 23 million persons without access to affordable coverage, so health centers will likely continue to play a central—and perhaps increasingly critical—role in caring for the uninsured. The experience of health centers in Massachusetts following implementation of that state’s landmark health reform law has demonstrated that as coverage has expanded, health centers have served an increasing proportion of the state’s uninsured residents.5 This policy brief reviews the opportunities and challenges facing community health centers as a result of health reform. Following an overview, we describe how reform affects the growth trajectory of the health center program and the evolving role of health centers in a health care system poised to undergo significant transformation. 1330 G STREET NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20005 P HONE: 202-347-5270, F AX: 202-347-5274 W EBSITE: WWW. KFF. ORG Overview Community Health Centers: Fast Facts Initially established in 1965 by the Office of Economic Opportunity Patient population 17.1 million (OEO) as a War on Poverty Health center grantees 1,080 demonstration program with roots Service sites 7,500 in the civil rights movement,6 today’s federally funded health Total patient visits 66.9 million centers reflect a national investment Medical visits 49.9 million of considerable proportions targeted Dental visits 7.3 million to increase access to care among underserved and medically Mental health/substance abuse visits 4.0 million Enabling and other professional disenfranchised populations. In 5.8 million 2008, 1,080 health centers operating service visits in more 7,500 sites provided Source: GWU analysis of 2008 UDS primary and comprehensive health care to more than 17.1 million people.7 An additional 100 “look-alike” health centers meeting all federal health center requirements but not receiving a federal grant under §330 of the Public Health Service Act served an estimated one million additional patients. Organized as non-profit clinical care providers and operated in accordance with comprehensive federal standards, health centers are defined by four key characteristics:8 Serve medically underserved populations; Provide a comprehensive range of “primary” health care services; Adjust charges for care based on patient income; and Governed by a community board, the majority of whose members are health center patients. Health centers are a key clinical presence in their communities. In 2008, health centers employed 51,187 medical, dental and mental health/substance abuse staff. The National Health Service Corps (NHSC), which provides scholarship and loan repayment support in exchange for service in urban and rural communities identified as experiencing a shortage of primary health care services, is an important source of clinical staffing for health centers. From 2003 through 2008, health centers employed approximately 5,350 full-time equivalent (FTE) clinicians supported by the NHSC, and health centers represent the single largest NHSC placement site.9 Given their location in the nation’s most medically underserved urban and rural communities, health centers are also a source of jobs and community enrichment, with a high rate of return into local health economies.10 2 00 Health Center Patients Figure 1 Anchoring the safety net in many Health Centers Serve Disproportionately Poor, Uninsured, and Publicly Insured Patients, 2008 communities, health centers play an 92% important role serving low-income, Health Center Patients U.S. Population uninsured, and publicly insured 70% patients. Compared to the U.S. population, health center patients are nearly six times as likely to be poor, 38% 36% two-and-a-half times as likely to be 31% uninsured, and nearly three times as 15% likely to be enrolled in Medicaid. 13% 12% Uninsured patients represent 38 percent of all health center patients. Together, Uninsured Medicaid At or below 100% of Under 200% of uninsured and Medicaid patients Poverty Poverty account for almost 75 percent Source: GW Department of Health Policy Analysis of 2008 UDS data and 2008 Current Population Survey of health center caseloads (Figure 1). Figure 2 Health center patients are Health Center Patients by Race/Ethnicity, 2008 disproportionately members of racial Total Patients Reporting Total Patients of Hispanic/Latino and ethnic minority groups. In 2008, of Race: 13.2 million Ethnicity: 5.7 million the patients for whom data on race was More than one race available 40 percent were racial White 6.2% 60.2% Hispanic minorities. Further, one-third of all 33% Asian All patients, many of whom reported their 0.9% Others* Black 67% race as White, were of Hispanic/Latino 27.7% ethnicity (Figure 2). Health center Amer. Indian, Native patients are also more likely to live in Hawaiian, rural areas (44 percent of health center Pacific Race Hispanic/Latino patients, compared with 21 percent of Islander 1.8% Identity NOTE: Race percentages are among patients who reported their race; 22.8 percent of total patients are missing race data. ‘White’ may include individuals of Hispanic/Latino descent. The 2008 UDS does not allow for estimates of White, non-Hispanic patients, but from 1996 - the population) and to be younger and 2006, one-third of patients identified as White and not of Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. *Ethnicity data are reported in two categories: Hispanic or Latino, and all others; All Others includes patients who did not report ethnicity. female; in 2008, children comprised 36 SOURCE: GW Department of Health Policy analysis of 2008 UDS data percent of all health center patients Figure 3 while nearly three in five patients were Health Center Patients and Visits are Chronic Illness- female.11 Related, Compared With Office-Based Physicians Percent of Patients with Serious 11% and Chronic Conditions 25% Compared with patients receiving care Percent of Health Centers Primary Care Offices from private physicians, health center Patient Visits 9% Involving Serious patients are nearly three times more and Chronic 7% likely to seek care for serious and Conditions 5% chronic conditions (Figure 3). At the 4% same time, health center patients, with 9% 3% 3% the exception of health center patients with private insurance, are more likely 1% to experience referral difficulties Health Centers Private Physician Offices Mental Diabetes Asthma Hypertension compared to similar patients treated in Disorders Notes: Estimates based on comparable diagnoses of diabetes, hypertension, asthma, heart disease and mental illness as a proportion of total medical visits. Source: Burt CW, McCaig LF, Rechtsteiner EA. Ambulatory Medical Care Utilization Source: Private Physicians from 2006 NAMCS (CDC National Center for Estimates for 2005. Advance data from vital and health statistics; no 388. Health Statistics, 2008). UDS, 2006. Hyattsville, MD: NCHS 2007. Health center data from 2007 UDS, HRSA. 00 3 private physicians’ offices (Figure 4). Key factors that explain these barriers may include the greater referral difficulties in the case of uninsured and Medicaid-insured patients generally coupled with the far higher volume of health center patients who require Figure 4 referral. Patients Experiencing Referral Difficulties, by Coverage Source: Health Centers and Physician Practices, 2006 Health Centers’ Patient Care Role Community health center Physician office 72% Health centers play an important role in reducing health disparities and 54% promoting population health by 39% 40% providing high quality care.12 Of particular
Recommended publications
  • State of Urban Community Health Centers in China: Nursing and Patient Perspectives (Observations on Challenges and Implications of Reform)

    State of Urban Community Health Centers in China: Nursing and Patient Perspectives (Observations on Challenges and Implications of Reform)

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Social Impact Research Experience (SIRE) Wharton Undergraduate Research 2012 State of Urban Community Health Centers in China: Nursing and Patient Perspectives (Observations on Challenges and Implications of Reform) Wendy Zhang University of Pennsylvania Linda Kang UPenn, Nursing Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/sire Part of the Business Commons, and the Public Health and Community Nursing Commons Zhang, Wendy and Kang, Linda, "State of Urban Community Health Centers in China: Nursing and Patient Perspectives (Observations on Challenges and Implications of Reform)" (2012). Social Impact Research Experience (SIRE). 16. https://repository.upenn.edu/sire/16 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/sire/16 For more information, please contact [email protected]. State of Urban Community Health Centers in China: Nursing and Patient Perspectives (Observations on Challenges and Implications of Reform) Disciplines Business | Nursing | Public Health and Community Nursing This working paper is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/sire/16 1 State of Urban Community Health Centers in China: Nursing and Patient Perspectives Observations on Challenges and Implications of Reform Linda Kang and Wendy Zhang A special thanks to our mentors Dr. Linda Aiken and Dr. Matthew McHugh from the Center of Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing and Dr. Marshall Meyer from the Wharton School. Thanks to Dr. Thomas Mackey from the University of Texas, Houston for lending his expertise while in China. Thanks to Dr. Yu Liu, Dr. Qian Lu, and Peking University School of Nursing for facilitating our stay and visits to the CHCs.
  • So You Want to Start a Health Center…? a Practical Guide for Starting a Federally Qualified Health Center

    So You Want to Start a Health Center…? a Practical Guide for Starting a Federally Qualified Health Center

    So You Want to Start a Health Center…? A Practical Guide for Starting a Federally Qualified Health Center Revised July 2011 If you have any questions, feel free to contact: Pamela Byrnes [email protected] Or Jaime Hirschfeld 7200 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 210 [email protected] Bethesda, MD 20814 Phone 301.347.0400 Fax 301.347.0459 This publication was supported by Grant/Cooperative Agreement No. U30CS00209 from the Health Resources and Services Administration, Bureau of Primary Health Care (HRSA/BPHC). www.nachc.com Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the of- ficial views of HRSA/BPHC. The National Association of Community Health Centers wishes to acknowledge the following for their contributions to this guide: Authors of the original 1996 edition Tom Trompeter and Jennifer Bright Bob Peoples and Suzanne Rossel of Community Health Associates, Inc. for updates Pamela Byrnes and Freda Mitchem of the National Association of Community Health Centers for input and edits in the 2005 revision Judith Shea, Pamela Byrnes and Jaime Hirschfeld for the 2011 revisions And to all of the people of the Health Center Movement whose daily experiences contributed immeasurably to the information herein A Practical Guide for Starting a Federally Qualified Health Center Table of Contents Helpful Acronyms . iii Foreword .....................................................................................iv Chapter I Health Center Basics A. Federally Qualified Health Centers . 2 B. Medically Underserved Areas and Populations ........................................ 3 C. Other Relevant Terminology....................................................... 3 D. Other Programs that Support Health Centers . 4 E. Strategic Considerations: Before Deciding to Proceed.................................. 6 Chapter II Ensuring Broad Community Support and Investment A.
  • Community Health Needs Assessment ©2019, University of North Dakota – Center for Rural Health Executive Summary

    Community Health Needs Assessment ©2019, University of North Dakota – Center for Rural Health Executive Summary

    Community Health Needs Assessment 1 ©2019, University of North Dakota – Center for Rural Health Table of Contents Executive Summary .........................................................................................3 Overview and Community Resources ..........................................................5 Assessment Process .........................................................................................14 Demographic Information ..............................................................................18 Survey Results ..................................................................................................27 Findings of Key Informant Interviews and Community Meeting ............51 Priority of Health Needs .................................................................................53 Next Steps – Strategic Implementation Plan ................................................58 Appendix A – Survey Instrument ..................................................................60 Appendix B – County Health Rankings Model ...........................................67 Appendix C – Youth Behavioral Risk Survey ..............................................78 Appendix D – Prioritization of Community’s Health Needs ....................82 Appendix E – Survey “Other” Responses ....................................................83 This project was supported, in part, by the Federal Office of Rural Health, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS),
  • Community Health Centers and Primary Care Access and Quality For

    Community Health Centers and Primary Care Access and Quality For

    Shi et al. International Journal for Equity in Health (2015) 14:90 DOI 10.1186/s12939-015-0222-7 RESEARCH Open Access Community health centers and primary care access and quality for chronically-ill patients – a case-comparison study of urban Guangdong Province, China Leiyu Shi1, De-Chih Lee2, Hailun Liang3, Luwen Zhang4, Marty Makinen5, Nathan Blanchet5, Ruth Kidane5, Magnus Lindelow6, Hong Wang7 and Shaolong Wu4* Abstract Objective: Reform of the health care system in urban areas of China has prompted concerns about the utilization of Community Health Centers (CHC). This study examined which of the dominant primary care delivery models, i.e., the public CHC model, the ‘gate-keeper’ CHC model, or the hospital-owned CHC models, was most effective in enhancing access to and quality of care for patients with chronic illness. Methods: The case-comparison design was used to study nine health care organizations in Guangzhou, Dongguan, and Shenzhen cities within Guangdong province, China. 560 patients aged 50 or over with hypertension or diabetes who visited either CHCs or hospitals in these three cities were surveyed by using face-to-face interviews. Bivariate analyses were performed to compare quality and value of care indicators among subjects from the three cities. Multivariate analyses were used to assess the association between type of primary care delivery and quality as well as value of chronic care after controlling for patients’ demographic and health status characteristics. Results: Patients from all three cities chose their current health care providers primarily out of concern for quality of care (both provider expertise and adequate medical equipment), patient-centered care, and insurance plan requirement.
  • Community Health Centers Ten Years After the Affordable Care Act: a Decade of Progress and the Challenges Ahead

    Community Health Centers Ten Years After the Affordable Care Act: a Decade of Progress and the Challenges Ahead

    Community Health Centers Ten Years After the Affordable Care Act: A Decade of Progress and the Challenges Ahead Geiger Gibson / RCHN Community Health Foundation Research Collaborative Policy Issue Brief #61 March 2020 Sara Rosenbaum, JD Jessica Sharac, MSc, MPH Peter Shin, PhD, MPH Maria Velasquez, MPH About the Geiger Gibson / RCHN Community Health Foundation Research Collaborative The Geiger Gibson Program in Community Health Policy, established in 2003 and named after human rights and health center pioneers Drs. H. Jack Geiger and Count Gibson, is part of the Milken Institute School of Public Health at the George Washington University. It focuses on the history and contributions of health centers and the major policy issues that affect health centers, their communities, and the patients that they serve. The RCHN Community Health Foundation is a not-for-profit foundation established to support community health centers through strategic investment, outreach, education, and cutting-edge health policy research. The only foundation in the U.S. dedicated solely to community health centers, RCHN CHF builds on a long-standing commitment to providing accessible, high-quality, community-based healthcare services for underserved and medically vulnerable populations. The Foundation’s gift to the Geiger Gibson program supports health center research and scholarship. Additional information about the Research Collaborative can be found online at https://publichealth.gwu.edu/projects/geiger-gibson-program-community-health-policy or at www.rchnfoundation.org. Geiger Gibson / RCHN Community Health Foundation Research Collaborative 2 Executive Summary By insuring the poorest Americans and creating a Community Health Center Fund to directly support expansion, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) enabled community health centers to reach millions of new patients.