Bioethics Committee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bioethics Committee National Bioethics Committee Guidelines and Teachers Handbook for Introducing Bioethics to Medical and Dental Students Developed by: Healthcare Ethics Committee (HCEC) of the National Bioethics Committee (NBC) http://nbcpakistan.org.pk/ Contents 1. Foreword i 2. HCEC Members ii 3. Introduction 1 4. Competencies, Objectives, Teaching and Assessment 4 5. Course Topics 7 6. Course Specifications 8 7. Introduction to Bioethics 17 8. Clinical Ethics 69 9. Medical Error 190 10. Using Patients for Education and Training 216 11. Organ Transplantations Ethics 233 12. Ethics of Physician-Pharmaceutical Industry Interactions 275 13. Human Subject Research Ethics 297 14. Public Health Ethics 304 15. Plagiarism and Scientific Misconduct 314 16. Ethics of Mental Healthcare 334 Foreword April 29, 2017 The primary responsibility of the Health Care Ethics Committee (HCEC) of the National Bioethics Committee (NBC) Pakistan, is to develop and utilize strategies to enhance bioethics capacity in Pakistan. To accomplish this, HCEC organizes and runs bioethics workshops for professionals involved in biomedical research and healthcare delivery systemsand members of Regional and Provincial Bioethics Committees. Recognizing that HCEC should also assist in ways to introduce bioethics to undergraduate medical and dental students and little progress has been made in this equally important area, led to the development of this document. In its first Code of Ethics for healthcare professionals, formulated in 2002, the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (PMDC) stated that medical and dental colleges, College of Physicians and Surgeons, and universities running postgraduate medical courses “are advised to incorporate medical ethics in their curriculum.” In reality, currently only a handful of medical and dental colleges include any bioethics education as part of their curriculum for students. It is within this background, to address this deficiency, that HCEC worked to develop this comprehensive document, “Guidelines and Teachers Handbook for Introducing Bioethics to Medical and Dental Students.” It is meant to assist universities and colleges in developing their own bioethics curriculum and it also provides useful tools for teachers involved in teaching this discipline. All articles/chapters included in this document are either from the Creative Commons (non-copyright material), or with permission obtained from relevant publishers for full reproduction. Sources are linked for easy accessibility. As and when necessary, HCEC will review and update this document in the future. The process of developing this document extended from February 2013 to August 2014. It included multiple meetings of HCEC, and presentation and discussion of drafts with NBC members for their input. NBC provided its final approval in March 2015. Bringing this document to fruition would not have been possible without the unstinting hard work and long hours spent by HCEC members and other professionals with relevant expertise who were co-opted for this process. A list of these colleagues and their backgrounds, and to whom I remain immensely grateful, appears on the next page. On April 25, 2017, the complete document was presented and discussed in a special meeting in Islamabad called by Mr. Muhammad Ayub Sheikh, Secretary, Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations and Coordination. Besides HCEC members and the Secretary, other relevant participants in the meeting included representatives from PMDC, HEC, and CPSP. The document was appreciated for its relevance and importance, and PMDC was asked to endorse and notify it as a resourse document for all medical and dental collages in Pakistan. The PMDC representive, Dr. Abid Farooqui (Vice President PMDC), promised that this will be done. We appreciate the help of Dr. Waquaruddin Ahmad and Mr. Roshan Kumar from Pakistan Health Research Council (PHRC), Sindh, Pakistan. Our thanks especially to the staff of the Centre of Biomedical Ethics and Culture (CBEC), SIUT - Michelle Fernandes, Aamir Shehzad and Loretta Iqbal - for their time and meticulous help in formulating the document in its final form. Dr. Farhat Moazam MD, PhD Chair, HCEC Professor and Chairperson Center of Biomedical Ethics and Culture, SIUT Karachi, Pakistan i HCEC Members 1. Farhat Moazam MD, FACS, PhD Professor & Chairperson Centre of Biomedical and Culture (CBEC), SIUT Karachi, Pakistan 2. Aasim Ahmad FCPS, MHSc (Bioethics) Professor, Dean & Chief Nephrologist The Kidney Centre Karachi, Pakistan 3. Aamir Jafarey FCPS, FRCS, MBE (Bioethics) Professor Centre of Biomedical and Culture (CBEC), SIUT Karachi, Pakistan 4. Farid Khan PhD Country Manager and Managing Director Pfizer Pakistan and Wyeth Pakistan Karachi, Pakistan 5. Shaukat Ali Jawaid BCom Chief Editor Pulse International Karachi, Pakistan 6. Haroon Ahmed MD, FCPS, FRCPS, DPM Director and Professor of Psychiatry Psycho Social Centre Karachi, Pakistan Co-opted Members: 7. Abdul Ghani PGD (Bioethics) Research and Training Officer Institute of Public Health Quetta, Pakistan 8. Asma Humayun MRCPsych, MMedSci Consultant Psychiatrist Meditrina Healthcare Rawalpindi, Pakistan 9. Saima Pervaiz Iqbal FCPS, MBE (Bioethics) Associate Professor and Section Head Community Health and Family Medicine Shifa College of Medicine Islamabad, Pakistan Acknowledgement: 10. Shahid Shamim FCPS, FRCS, PGD (Bioethics), MHPE Associate Professor Surgery & Head of Medical Education Unit King Abdulaziz University Jeddah, Saudi Arabia ii Introduction The Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (PMDC) formulated its first Code of Ethics in 2002 which stipulated that biomedical ethics should be taught in all medical/dental colleges in the country. This Code was updated in June 2011 and reissued as the “Code of Ethics of Practice for Medical and Dental Practitioners, Regulations 2011”. 1 (PMDC Code of Ethics) The Code advises that medical ethics should be incorporated in the curriculum of all medical and dental colleges, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Pakistan as well as by Universities running postgraduate medical courses, and calls for “strategies” for the dissemination of information about ethics. Despite this, no formal steps have been taken in this direction, nor is guidance available at a national level for institutions who may wish to undertake teaching of bioethics. Only a handful of colleges and universities in the private and public sector currently include sessions on ethics to varying degrees as part of their undergraduate medical and dental teachings. The concept of professional codes of conduct for healthcare professionals is not a new phenomenon and can be traced back to the era of Hammurabi (3000 BCE). A better known text is the Hippocratic Oath (500 BCE) which still forms the basis for many oaths taken by students upon graduation from medical colleges today. Examples of professional codes are also found in major religious traditions such as Al- Ruhawi’s Adab at Tabib (900 BCE) in Islam and by Moses Maimonides (1200 BCE) in Judaism. These earlier codes, written exclusively by physicians for physicians, focused on the character and duties of professionals and emphasized the principle of beneficence in which the physician decides what lies in the best interest of the patient. These traditional codes, still important today in their emphasis on the virtues required for a good healthcare professional, were formulated during times when medical knowledge was relatively limited and physicians had little to offer in the way of diagnosis and therapy to their patients. The twentieth century saw an explosion in the advancement of medical science, biotechnology, and complex human subject research which changed the face of medical practice and research giving rise to novel ethical dilemmas. Examples included the advent of ventilators allowing irrevocably comatose patients to be kept “alive” for weeks, the capability of transplanting organs from one individual to another, and breakthroughs in genetic and reproductive science. Together with this, the nature of medical practice changed from a relationship between a healthcare giver and his/her patient to a health industry consisting of depersonalized hospitals often run on profit basis and several specialists involved in the care of one patient. Modern medicine led to complex ethical dilemmas that required new solutions, and for which traditional codes alone became inadequate. Contemporary (modern) bioethics emerged in the USA in the 1960s in response to the changing nature of physician-patient interactions, healthcare delivery systems, and the increasing complexity of human subject research. It was driven by several scandalous cases in which patients and research subjects had been exploited by physicians and researchers withholding or providing inadequate information to them. The defining characteristic of bioethics involved a shift from exclusive reliance on medical “facts,” and knowledge and authority of physicians (doctor centered) to recognition that patients have intrinsic rights as equal partners in decisions about therapy and what constitutes their best interest (patient centered). The requirement for providing full information and voluntary consent of subjects also became the key element for ethical research. 1 PMDC Code of Ethics: http://www.pmdc.org.pk/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=v5WmQYMvhz4%3D&tabid=102&mid=554. 1 Unlike the exclusively physician generated traditional codes of ethics, bioethics is a multidisciplinary field. It incorporates input from non-medical sciences such
Recommended publications
  • Edited Gregerson on Marketing Health
    Public Testimony to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services October 22, 2009, Kansas City, KS Public Meeting Online Submission, Mary Gregerson, PhD Why has the United States lagged behind developing countries in accessing creative media technology outlets to disseminate public health information and facilitate behavioral change into social mores? For instance, in Uganda the AFFORD Health Marketing Initiative in April 2007 launched an entertaining and educative television, radio, and community-based game show called “The Good Life Gameshow” also has a telephone hotline, print materials, and neighborhood Good Life Teams complemented this game show. The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health/Center for Communication Programs led this 2005-2010 initiative funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development. In another African example, between 2002 and 2004 47% of Ethopian men and 42% Ethiopian women tuned into a 257 episode radio serial drama Yeken Kignit (“Looking over One’s Daily Life”). This social content drama used the theory and evidence based eight step Sabido methodology for behavior change via mass media communication to target reproductive health and women’s status, including family planning, marital communication, and HIV/AIDS (Barker & Sabido, 2005). Independent research documented a dramatic increase in AIDS testing for listeners (4 times for men and 3 times for women) compared to non-listeners and a significant reduction in prejudice toward those with HIV/AIDS. The Sabido method (named after Televisa [Mexican television] vice president for research Miguel Sabido of Mexico) applies behavioral change theory through creative mass media outlets and has scientific proof of effective positive behavior change in the more than 200 health intervention programs in more than 50 countries in Latin America, Africa, and Asia (Singhal et al., 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Mp-Hfm-108-$$All
    NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY ORGANISATION ORGANISATION AC/323(HFM-108)TP/55 www.rta.nato.int RTO MEETING PROCEEDINGS MP-HFM-108 NATO Medical Surveillance and Response, Research and Technology Opportunities and Options (La surveillance médicale et les réponses au sein de l’OTAN: les possibilités et les options pour la recherche et la technologie) Papers prepared for the RTO Human Factors and Medicine Panel (HFM) Symposium which was held in Budapest, Hungary, 19-21 April 2004. Published June 2004 Distribution and Availability on Back Cover NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY ORGANISATION ORGANISATION AC/323(HFM-108)TP/55 www.rta.nato.int RTO MEETING PROCEEDINGS MP-HFM-108 NATO Medical Surveillance and Response, Research and Technology Opportunities and Options (La surveillance médicale et les réponses au sein de l’OTAN: les possibilités et les options pour la recherche et la technologie) Papers prepared for the RTO Human Factors and Medicine Panel (HFM) Symposium which was held in Budapest, Hungary, 19-21 April 2004. The Research and Technology Organisation (RTO) of NATO RTO is the single focus in NATO for Defence Research and Technology activities. Its mission is to conduct and promote co-operative research and information exchange. The objective is to support the development and effective use of national defence research and technology and to meet the military needs of the Alliance, to maintain a technological lead, and to provide advice to NATO and national decision makers. The RTO performs its mission with the support of an extensive network of national experts. It also ensures effective co-ordination with other NATO bodies involved in R&T activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to Limit Or Quash the Civil Investigative Demand Filed By
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ) ORIGINAL IN THE MATTER OF ) ) Michael J. Daugherty, ) President, LabMD Inc. ) ) ) MICHAEL DAUGHERTY'S PETITION TO LIMIT OR QUASH THE CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND Claudia Callaway, Esq. Christina Grigorian, Esq. Julian Dayal, Esq. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP 2900 K Street, NW North Tower - Suite 200 Washington, DC 20007 Phone: (202) 625-3613 Facsimile: (202) 298-7570 Email: [email protected] Counsel for Petitioner Table of Contents I. FACTUAL SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 1 A. The 1,718 File Was Illegally Downloaded By Tiversa, Inc., A Technology Corporation Using Patented Computer Technology, With The Support Of Federally- Funded Researchers At Dartmouth College ................................................................. 2 B. LabMD's Lawsuit Against Tiversa and Dartmouth College ........................................ 4 II. ARGUMENT ...................................................................................................................... 5 A. The FTC's Authority Under Section 45 ........................................................................ 5 B. There Is No Basis Under Section 45 To Support Enforcement Of The Present CID, Which Is In All Events Exceedingly Overbroad And Unduly Burdensome ................ 7 C. The CID Should Be Quashed Because It Is Not Authorized by A Valid Resolution And Is Therefore Indefinite, Overbroad, And Incapable Of Demonstrating A
    [Show full text]
  • B ~ C 0 R a Still the Second Best Thing About Payday
    B ~ C 0 R a Still The Second Best Thing About Payday Friends of the Clinical Center Fills HIGH LI G H-T S Hurray for Hollywood Gaps for Patients Prime-Time Television Show Offers By Jane DeMouy NIH Teams with NIB Opportunity At 11 a.m. any day of the week, Christine Hollywood, TV Brake, executive director of the Friends of By Carla Garnett the Clinical Center (FOCC), is likely to be triding purposefully down a bustling city street, a business­ considering a request from a Clinical Center Pardes To Give man stops suddenly in mid-cell phone conversation and social worker. A patient from Michigan has Shannon Lecture Scollapses to the sidewalk. Up close, his complexion takes on a bluish tint. Moments later the man is seen in an isolation unit of an emergency room, an oxygen mask affixed to his face. In walk several physicians, barking orders sharply to the hospital's Survey Shows staff and interrogating the patient. Sounds like a medical mystery Thirst for Medical Information NIH researchers solve on a routine day at the Clinical Center, right? Perhaps not, but when NBC decided to develop its new prime-time drama Medical Investigation, the show's writers and producers deliberately chose the National Institutes of Health as NIH To Accept the government agency employing its fictional team of physician­ Electronic Grant detectives. The story of how-within a few short months-NIH FOCC board member Joa1111e Pomponio Applications came nor only to welcome the drama and aid in its development, (I) and Executive Director Christine Brake but also to embrace the power of Hollywood is something of an been unable to work during his 3•month ongoing mini-documentary itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes Endnotes for Chapter 1
    1 Who Are Nurses and Where Have They Gone? • 21 Notes In these endnotes, The Truth About Nursing is abbreviated “TAN” and the Center for Nursing Advocacy as “CFNA.” Please see www.truthaboutnurs ing.org/references/ for live hyperlinks providing easy online access to virtually all of the references cited below. 1. TAN, “Q: Are You Sure Nurses Are Autonomous? Based on What I’ve Seen, It Sure Looks Like Physicians Are Calling the Shots,” accessed January 28, 2014, http:// tinyurl.com/7qfa8zu. 2. Hanne Dina Bernstein, “Reflections: Two Cups: The Healing Power of Tea,” American Journal of Nursing 104, no. 4 (April 2004): 39, http://tinyurl.com/ nqjbyez. 3. Cnet.com, “Biden: ‘Doctors Allow You to Live; Nurses Make You Want to Live’ ” (June 3, 2013), http://tinyurl.com/ks6jlgm. 4. Julie Thao, “Julie Thao’s Speech in Pasadena,” California, January 28, 2010, YouTube video, http://tinyurl.com/obtuutb. 5. International Council of Nurses, “About ICN” (June 14, 2013), http://tinyurl. com/ nxubwo4. 6. US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Occupational Employment Statistics: May 2012 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates,” http://tinyurl.com/q2ywzuv. 7. US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), “The Registered Nurse Population: Findings from the 2008 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses” (2010), http://tinyurl. com/7zgyet7. 8. US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Physicians and Surgeons,” accessed January 8, 2014, http://tinyurl.com/77ghlzk. 9. David I. Auerbach, Douglas O. Staiger, Ulrike Muench, and Peter I. Buerhaus, “The Nursing Workforce: A Comparison of Three National Surveys,” Nursing Economic$ 30, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Factpack2005.Pdf
    A SUPPLEMENT TO 3RD ANNUAL SPONSORED BY GUIDE TO ADVERTISING & MARKETING Published Feb. 28, 2005 © Copyright 2005 Crain Communications Inc. Last year, FACT PACK Paramount promised you TOP LINE DATA ON THE ADVERTISING AND MEDIA INDUSTRIES a sudden power surge in access. WHO ARE THE TOP marketers by ad spending in the U.S. and on a global basis? What ads are the hottest and which TV shows command the highest prices for a :30 spot? Who are the big marketing organizations and how do their agency brands stack up against their competition? How big and far-reaching are those multifaceted media goliaths? It’s all in the FactPack, whether in print form on your desk, or a click away on your computer or network. The FactPack is presented in three sections: Advertising and Marketing section data were taken from Advertising Age’s 49th annual 100 Leading National Advertisers, and the publication’s 200 Megabrand and Global Marketing reports. The 100 Leading National Advertisers report breaks out total ad spending by media for the largest U.S. advertisers and adds an Ad Age-pro- prietary unmeasured number to media spending for a comprehensive U.S. ad total. The LNA report also charts the hotly contested industry categories by market share and brand spending. The Media section’s primary sources are the 100 Leading Media Companies, an annual ranking of the nation’s media companies by net revenue, and the Ad Age Magazine 300 report, an annual ranking by gross revenue of advertising and circula- tion combined that determines the 300 top magazines.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Direct Statement of the Mpaa-Represented Program Suppliers
    Before the COPYRIGHT ROYALTY JUDGES Washington, D.C. ) In the Matter of ) ) Distribution of the ) Docket No. 2012-6 CRB CD 2004-2009 ) (Phase II) 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and ) 2009 Cable Royalty Funds ) ) WRITTEN DIRECT STATEMENT OF THE MPAA-REPRESENTED PROGRAM SUPPLIERS VOLUME I OF II WRITTEN TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS Gregory O. Olaniran D.C. Bar No. 455784 Lucy Holmes Plovnick D.C. Bar No. 488752 Kimberly P. Nguyen D.C. Bar No. 996237 Naomi Straus D.C. Bar No. 1011753 MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP 1818 N Street, NW, 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 355-7917 Facsimile: (202) 355-7887 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for MPAA-Represented May9,2014 Program Suppliers Before the COPYRIGHT ROYALTY JUDGES Washington, D.C. ) In the Matter of ) ) Distribution of the ) Docket No. 2012-6 CRB CD 2004-2009 ) (Phase II) 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and ) 2009 Cable Royalty Funds ) ) WRITTEN DIRECT STATEMENT OF MPAA-REPRESENTED PROGRAM SUPPLIERS The Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. ("MPAA"), on behalf of its member companies and other producers and/or distributors of syndicated movies, series, specials, and non-team sports broadcast by television stations who have agreed to representation by MPAA ("MPAA-represented Program Suppliers"),1 in accordance with the September 23, 2013 Order of the Copyright Royalty Judges ("Judges"), hereby submit their Written Direct Statement in the captioned matter. MPAA submits this introductory memorandum in order to summarize the evidence it intends to present in this proceeding and to state the Phase II Claims of MPAA-represented Program Suppliers for the 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 cable royalty funds ("2004-2009 Cable Royalties").
    [Show full text]