TNI & POLRI Forces in West Papua
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Internal Conflict Resolution Between Government of Indonesia and Separatist Movement in Papua Using Horse-Trading Mechanism
Society, 7 (2), 83-100, 2019 P-ISSN: 2338-6932 | E-ISSN: 2597-4874 https://society.fisip.ubb.ac.id Internal Conflict Resolution between Government of Indonesia and Separatist Movement in Papua using Horse-Trading Mechanism Sekar Wulan Febrianti 1 , Ajeng Sekar Arum 1,* , Windy Dermawan 1 , and Akim 1 1 Department of International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Padjadjaran University, 45363 West Java, Indonesia * Corresponding Author: [email protected] ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Publication Info: The study aims to analyze the process of internal conflict Literature Review resolution between the Government of Indonesia and the separatist movement in Papua (Free Papua Movement How to cite: (Indonesian: Organisasi Papua Merdeka or OPM)) using a Febrianti, S. W., Arum, A. S., horse-trading mechanism. This study was qualitative method Dermawan, W., & Akim, A. (2019). by discussing the Free Papua Movement background and the Internal Conflict Resolution Between conflict, then discussing the conflict process of timeline Government of Indonesia and analysis tool to understand the development of its movement Separatist Movement in Papua using based on chronological order, and discussing the conflict Horse-Trading Mechanism. Society, resolutions that have been carried out with conflict mapping 7(2), 83-100. analysis tool to understand the actors that involved and their DOI : 10.33019/society.v7i2.86 objectives. The conflict is the result of complexity among historical backgrounds, ideology, and a sense of injustice in Copyright © 2019. Owned by Papua, on the other hand, the international community has Author(s), published by Society increasingly supported Papua. Horse-trading has been used to resolve the conflict of Free Papua Movement and the Government of Indonesia, yet it has not yet reached a new resolution. -
Political Reviews • Melanesia 433 Sandra Tarte
political reviews • melanesia 433 the fap–svt coalition, and this seemed References to be confirmed when in late Decem- FT, Fiji Times. Daily. Suva. ber Adi Kuini Speed announced her resignation as chair of the Fijian Asso- jpsc, Joint Parliamentary Select Commit- ciation Party. Her reasons were prima- tee. 1997. Report of the Joint Parliamen- rily linked to poor health. However, tary Select Committee on the Report of the there were also reports of discord in Fiji Constitution Review Committee. Par- liamentary Paper 17. Suva: Government the party over the ongoing coalition Printer. with the Soqosoqo ni Vakavulewa ni Taukei. Post, The Daily Post. Suva. After a decade of national pain and Reeves, Paul, Tomasi R Vakatora, and Brij recrimination, there was a certain V Lal. 1996. The Fiji Islands: Towards a irony in the way 1997 ended. A United Future. Report of the Fiji Constitu- spokesman for the Taukei Move- tion Review Commission. Parliamentary ment—the archnationalist Fijian Paper 34. Suva: Government Printer. movement that had strongly backed Reprinted 1997. the coups—called for 1998 to be “a Review. Monthly. Suva. year of reconciliation and the true crossroads where Fijians and Indians leave aside their racial differences.” He also advocated the renewal of land Irian Jaya leases to Indian tenant farmers (Post, The Human Development Index pub- 30 Dec 1997, 2). Meanwhile a poll lished in the Indonesian Central conducted by the Fiji Times found that Bureau of Statistics’ 1996 Social Eco- more Indians preferred Rabuka as nomic National Survey placed Irian prime minister to Reddy or any other Jaya near the bottom of the provincial candidate. -
Project Title
Joint Programme on Combating Violence against Women and Girls in Papua Province Indonesia UNFPA FUND CODE : UZJ03 ______________________________ 1 Project Overview: A joint AWP 2011 was signed by the head of the Provincial Women’s Empowerment Bureau (POWE) on behalf of the Papua Technical Working Group (PTWG), and was implemented in June 2011. It reflected work at the provincial level and three districts. - Province of Papua - Keerom, Jayapura and Jayawijaya The rate of violence against women and children in Papua is the highest in Indonesia, reaching 13.62% and 12.47%, based on the VAWC module attached to a socio-economic survey in 2006. This figure is 4.5 times higher than the national average of 3%. The “Gender and Poverty Analysis” in Papua conducted by UNICEF (2007) revealed that almost all women interviewed confirmed that they were beaten by their husbands on the grounds of failing to do their “jobs” as wives properly, such as not having meals ready on time or refusing to engage in sexual relations. Findings of this report are mirrored in the ICMC report on GBV in Jayapura, which states 57% out of 193 women interviewed disclosed that wife beating is common among Papuan men. During focus group discussions with men from Sorong, Jayapura, and Jayawijaya, 70% admitted to beating their wives in the same year, and the same percentage admitted to using physical violence more than once. Based on 216 cases of domestic violence reported in Jayawijaya regency from 1999 to 2002, alcoholism and gambling have been identified as the main causes. Although it seems alcohol is a large contributor to violence against women, most of the men interviewed claimed the reasons for using violence include dissatisfaction with the wife’s service (sex and food), jealousy, and rage. -
"Don't Bother, Just Let Him Die"
"DON'T BOTHER, JUST LET HIM DIE" KILLING WITH IMPUNITY IN PAPUA Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International Indonesia 2018 Cover photo: A Papuan woman mourns the victim of shootings in Paniai Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a © Amnesty International Indonesia/Bagus Septa Pratama Creative Commons (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons license. First published in 2018 by Amnesty International Indonesia HDI Hive Menteng 3rd Floor, Probolinggo 18 Jakarta Pusat 10350 Index: ASA 21/8198/2018 Original language: English Printed by Amnesty International Indonesia amnesty.org – amnestyindonesia.org "DON'T BOTHER, JUST LET HIM DIE": KILLING WITH IMPUNITY IN PAPUA "DON'T BOTHER, JUST LET HIM DIE": KILLING WITH IMPUNITY IN PAPUA 3 Amnesty International Indonesia CONTENTS GLOSSARY 5 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 2. BACKGROUND 13 3. INDONESIA’S OBLIGATION UNDER INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW AND IN NATIONAL LEGISLATION 23 4. -
Indo 73 0 1106940148 89 1
Morning Star Rising? Indonesia Raya and the New Papuan Nationalism' Peter King "Slavery, plunder, exploitation . We have been thirty-five years alone . "*1 2 The future Information Minister and "intellectual general" associated with the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Jakarta, Brigadier-General Ali Murtopo, made a speech in 1969 to some of the 1,025 "representative" Papuans who were press-ganged into supporting the so-called Act of Free Choice which led to the official incorporation of West Papua into Indonesia. In the words of one of the 1,025, as reported by a Dutch journalist: Indonesia, as the strongest military power in Southeast Asia, is able to strike fear into any country. Jakarta [is] not interested in us Papuans but in West Irian as a territory. If we want to be independent. we had better ask God if he could find us an island in the Pacific where we could emigrate. 115 million Indonesians had fought for West Irian for years . they had made many sacrifices in the struggle and therefore would not allow their aspirations to be crossed by a handful of Papuans. Short shrift would be made of those who voted 1 1 would like to thank my colleagues—all of them—at the University of Kagoshima Research Center for the Pacific Islands for their generous help in the preparation of this article during 2000-01: Professors Noda Shinichi, Nakano Kazutaka, and Aoyama Torn, and also (not least) Ms. Kusumoto Hiroko. Theo van den Broek made an invaluable comment on an early draft, as did Danilyn Rutherford on two later ones. -
Download This PDF File
Jurnal Bestuur Vol.7, Issue.1, Agustus, 2019 P-ISSN 2302-3783 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (cc-by) Economic Law Creation Beautiful Global Indonesia Liana Endah Susanti Faculty of Law, Universitas Soerjo Ngawi – Indonesia. Email Coresponden: [email protected] Abstract Indonesia is the world 's largest archipelago with 1,904,569 km2 of surface area. A very diverse landscape with a variety of abundance of flora and fauna is a special attraction for foreign tourists. Not only that, the natural wealth in Indonesia 's intestines is also very abundant, as are various minerals and richness from other mining materials. However, a abundance of skilled human capital, both in terms of science and technology mastered, do not complement the plentiful natural resources. This is one of the reasons superpowers should be providing cooperation. PT. PT. Freeport is an clear example of Indonesia 's collaboration in the mining sector with foreign parties. The first contract for Freeport-Indonesia was established in 1967. After the Foreign Investment Law was passed in 1967, Freeport became the first foreign mining firm to operate in Indonesia. But the existence of this partnership was regretted by many because it was perceived to be detrimental to the region. The reason is that so far nobody knows for sure how much gold and silver has been produced from the mining to date. The magnitude of the distribution of mining goods is also not quite good given that Indonesia owns land which is turned into gold fields. There are, in fact, many reports uncovering miserable stories of discrimination by indigenous people around the mining region. -
Internal Displacementmonitoringcentre
Global Overview of Trends and Developments in 2009 and Developments Trends of Global Overview Internal Displacement Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre Norwegian Refugee Council Internal Displacement Chemin de Balexert 7-9 CH-1219 Châtelaine (Geneva) Tel.: +41 22 799 07 00, Fax: +41 22 799 07 01 Global Overview of Trends and www.internal-displacement.org Developments in 2009 Internally displaced people worldwide December 2009 Turkey 954,000–1,201,000 Russian Federation Armenia Azerbaijan Uzbekistan 80,000 8,400 586,000 FYR Macedonia 3,400 Serbia 650 Turkmenistan 225,000– Undetermined 230,000 Georgia Kosovo At least Afghanistan 19,700 230,000 At least 297,000 Croatia 2,400 Bosnia & Herz. 114,000 Cyprus Up to 201,000 Pakistan 1,230,000 Israel Undetermined Nepal 50,000–70,000 Occupied Palestinian Territory At least 160,000 India Algeria At least 500,000 Undetermined Chad 168,000 Bangladesh Senegal Iraq 60,000–500,000 24,000–40,000 2,764,000 Mexico The Philippines 5,000–8,000 Liberia Sri Lanka 125,000–188,000 Undetermined Syria 433,000 400,000 Côte d´Ivoire Lebanon Undetermined 90,000–390,000 Guatemala Togo Yemen Myanmar Undetermined Undetermined At least 175,000 At least 470,000 Indonesia Eritrea 70,000–120,000 Timor-Leste Niger 10,000 Colombia 6,500 400 3,300,000–4,900,000 Ethiopia Nigeria 300,000– Undetermined CAR 350,000 162,000 Peru Sudan Somalia 150,000 4,900,000 1,500,000 Congo Kenya 7,800 Undetermined DRC Uganda 1,900,000 At least 437,000 Angola Rwanda Undetermined Burundi Undetermined 100,000 Zimbabwe 570,000–1,000,000 Internal Displacement Global Overview of Trends and Developments in 2009 May 2010 Internally displaced children shell their family’s monthly ten-kilogramme ration of beans inside their home at Buhimbe Camp near Goma in North Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo. -
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Emergency Humanitarian Aid Decision 23 02 01 Title
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID - ECHO Emergency Humanitarian Aid Decision 23 02 01 Title: Emergency Humanitarian Aid for the population of the Province of Papua in Indonesia affected by a cholera outbreak. Location of operation: INDONESIA Amount of Decision: EUR 367,000 Decision reference number: ECHO/IDN/BUD/2006/01000 Explanatory Memorandum 1 - Rationale, needs and target population: On April 25th, an outbreak of diarrhea was reported to have killed 58 residents within a few weeks1, in three highland districts of Papua, Indonesia (Jayawijaya, Yakuhimo and Tolikara). A few days later the health authorities, based on tests from three laboratories2, confirmed that the outbreak was due to cholera (Vibrio Cholerae Type Ogawa), although some3 fatal diarrhea cases are believed to have a different, unidentified origin. As of May 6th 4,015 cases and 160 deaths had been reported4. The number of casualties is however believed to be grossly under-estimated, as some cases in remote areas were not reported. The reported cases are distributed as follows: 1 The outbreak is thought, with no certainty, to have originated from the non-hygienic food served during a tribal ritual on March 16th. 2 28 of March. Referral Health Laboratory of Surabaya, Java. Six samples out of eight received on the 24 of March resulted positive to Vibrio Cholerae Type Ogawa 7 of April. Referral Health Laboratory of Surabaya, Java. Two samples out of seven received on the 4 of April resulted positive to Vibrio Cholerae Type Ogawa 25 of April. Provincial Health Laboratory of Jayapura, Papua. Two samples out of thirteen received on the 11 of April resulted positive to Vibrio Cholerae Type Ogawa 3 of May. -
The Impact of Migration on the People of Papua, Indonesia
The impact of migration on the people of Papua, Indonesia A historical demographic analysis Stuart Upton Department of History and Philosophy University of New South Wales January 2009 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 ‘I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by others, with whom I have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the project’s design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged.’ Signed ………………………………………………. Stuart Upton 2 Acknowledgements I have received a great deal of assistance in this project from my supervisor, Associate-Professor Jean Gelman Taylor, who has been very forgiving of my many failings as a student. I very much appreciate all the detailed, rigorous academic attention she has provided to enable this thesis to be completed. I would also like to thank my second supervisor, Professor David Reeve, who inspired me to start this project, for his wealth of humour and encouragement. -
Case Study of the CAO's Approach to the PT Weda Nickel Mine Complaint
NON-JUDICIAL REDRESS MECHANISMS REPORT SERIES 10 Case Study of the CAO’s Approach to the PT Weda Nickel Mine Complai nt Barriers to Mediation in a Climate of Fear Dr Shelley Marshall MonaSh univerSity Kate taylor inDepenDent reSearcher Dr Samantha Balaton-chrimes DeaKin univerSity Aboutthisreportseries this report is part of a series produced by the non-Judicial human rights redress Mechanisms project, which draws on the findings of five years of research. the findings are based on over 587 interviews, with 1,100 individuals, across the countries and case studies covered by the research. non- judicial redress mechanisms are mandated to receive complaints and mediate grievances, but are not empowered to produce legally binding adjudications. the focus of the project is on analysing the effectiveness of these mechanisms in responding to alleged human rights violations associated with transnational business activity. the series presents lessons and recommendations regarding ways that: • non-judicial mechanisms can provide redress and justice to vulnerable communities and workers • non-government organisations and worker representatives can more effectively utilise the mechanisms to provide support for and represent vulnerable communities and workers • redress mechanisms can contribute to long-term and sustainable respect and remedy of human rights by businesses throughout their operations, supply chains and other business re - lationships. the non-Judicial human rights redress Mechanisms project is an academic research collaboration between the university of Melbourne, Monash university, the university of newcastle, rMit university, Deakin university and the university of essex. the project was funded by the australian research council with support provided by a number of non-government organisations, including core coalition uK, homeWorkers Worldwide, oxfam australia and actionaid australia. -
591464344.Pdf
United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/27/IDN/1 General Assembly Distr.: General 20 February 2017 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Twenty-seventh session 1–12 May 2017 National report submitted in accordance with paragraph 5 of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 16/21* Indonesia * The present document has been reproduced as received. Its content does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations. GE.17-01922(E) A/HRC/WG.6/27/IDN/1 Contents Page I. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 II. Methodology and consultation process ................................................................... 3 III. Follow up to the 2012 recommendations and beyond ............................................. 3 A. Ratification of International Human Rights Conventions ............................... 3 B. Cooperation with UN human rights mechanism and others ........................... 4 C. Normative, educational and institutional frameworks on human rights ......... 4 D. Cooperation with civil society ........................................................................ 6 E. Promoting the rights of women and the vulnerable groups ............................ 7 F. Migrant workers.............................................................................................. 13 G. Combating trafficking and slavery................................................................. -
Conflict Analysis and Policy Recommendation on Papua
Conflict Analysis and Policy Recommendation on Papua Conflict Analysis and Policy Recommendation on Papua Yulia Sugandi JAKARTA, 2008 Conflict Analysis and Policy Recommendation on Papua Table of Content Executive Summary...................................... 3 1. General Context of Papua.............................. 3 2. Pre-Otsus Conflict Lines................................ 4 3. Turning Point: Otsus in 2001........................... 6 4. Post-2001 Conditions.................................... 7 5. Sources of Frustration................................... 8 6. Local Actors............................................... 17 7. International Actors..................................... 23 8. Future Scenarios......................................... 24 9. Recommendation for International Agencies........ 25 10. Final Remarks........................................... 27 Glossary.................................................... 28 About FES INDONESIA Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (FES) Indonesia Office was established in 1968, and particularly since 1998 FES has been work- ing in various activities to support the democratization and socio-economic development in Indonesia. The area of work of FES covers political education, good governance, legal reform, human rights, conflict prevention and resolutions, security sector reform, free and fair media, strengthening trade union, and gender mainstreaming. These objectives are sought through cooperation with Indonesian institutions, namely the civil society organizations and other corresponding