Ground Water As a Possible Controller of Surf Diatom Biomass
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Keurbooms-Bitou Estuarine Management Plan
Keurbooms-Bitou Estuarine Management Plan Draft Final October 2018 Keurbooms Estuarine Management Plan i DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Document title and version: Keurbooms-Bitou Estuarine Management Plan Project Name: Western Cape Estuary Management Framework and Implementation Strategy Client: Western Cape Government, Department of Environmental Affairs & Development Planning Royal HaskoningDHV reference number: MD1819 Authority reference: EADP 1/2015 Compiled by: Version 1: Enviro-Fish Africa (Pty) Ltd (2011) Version 2: Royal HaskoningDHV (2018) Acknowledgements: Western Cape Government Environmental Affairs & Development Planning Directorate: Biodiversity and Coastal Management Sub-Directorate: Coastal Management Email: [email protected] Date: October 2018 Keurbooms-Bitou Estuarine Management Plan DOCUMENT USE The South Africa National Estuarine Management Protocol (‘the Protocol’), promulgated in May 2013 under the National Environmental Management: Integrated Coastal Management Act (Act No. 24 of 2008, as amended 20141) (ICM Act), sets out the minimum requirements for individual Estuarine Management Plans (EMPs). In 2013/2014, a review was conducted by the Department of Environmental Affairs: Oceans and Coasts (DEA: O&C) (DEA, 2014) on the existing management plans to ensure, inter alia, the alignment of these plans with the Protocol. This revision of the Keurbooms-Bitou Estuarine Management Plan, including the Situation Assessment Report and the Management Plan itself, is in response to the comments received during the -
Water Losses
Bitou Municipality Engineering Services Water Services Section An Overview - Water Losses Franclyn Samuel Pr Eng (Civil) To infinity and beyond…… Presentation Outline • Introduction to Bitou Municipality Water Services • Non Revenue Water and Water Losses • Bitou Municipality – Water Losses • Planned Interventions (to infinity and beyond) • Closure OVERVIEW BITOU MUNICIPALITY WATER SERVICES BITOU MUNICIPALITY – AT A GLANCE • Bitou Municipality Quick Stats: • 992m2 • Estimated 50,000+ residents • Coastal resorts of Natures Valley, Keurboomstrand • Kurland, Wittedrif, Plettenberg Bay, Kranshoek, Harkerville OVERVIEW– WATER SERVICES • Consistent high achiever – water quality standards • WSA, WSP • 20,600 households – billed for water OVERVIEW - WATER SERVICES Current Demands: 10ML/d (4Mm3/a) • Groot River – Natures Valley ( • Wit River and Boreholes – Kurland ( 6Ml/d= 6053kl/d) • Boreholes - Harkerville (1,9ML/month/ 0.1 ML/d) • Keurbooms River (105l/s or 9ML/d) • Piesangs River off channel storage - Roodefontein Dam – capable of 290l/s, allocation = 145l/s= 12,5ML/d • 7 boreholes – 1Ml/d • Desalination Plant 2Ml/d OVERVIEW - WATER SERVICES continued 32 reservoirs (storage) 70 pump stations Water quality laboratory 2 waste water treatment plants 3 water treatment plants 80+ staff including 14+ process controllers NON REVENUE WATER NON-REVENUE WATER Represented as the % of total amount of water produced NRW = Unbilled Authorised Consumption + Water Losses • Authorised Consumption: metered and un-metered • Authorised Metered : municipal properties, etc. • Authorised Not metered: unplanned activities eg. fire fighting, maintenance activities (sewer lines, stormwater) NON-REVENUE WATER The International Water Association Standard NON-REVENUE WATER Represented as the % of total amount of water produced Authorised Metered (municipal properties) Unbilled Authorised Consumption Authorised Not metered: unplanned activities eg. -
APPENDIX G Specialist Input
APPENDIX G Specialist Input This Appendix contains the following information: G1. Environmental Sensitivity Report (Compiled by bluepebble independent environmental agency in association with Peet Joubert of Nature Management Services) G2. Heritage Specialist Input (Compiled by Peter Nilssen (PhD) Archaeological and Heritage Specialist) bluepebble independent environmental agency Construction of a dwelling on Erf 569, House Kovarsky, Keurboomstrand, Plettenberg Bay Basic Assessment Report Appendix G: Specialist Input G1. Environmental Sensitivity Report. bluepebble independent environmental agency [email protected] www.bluepebble.biz 082 777 0705 (m) 086 553 8837 (f) 19 March 2010 Environmental Sensitivity Report House Kovarsky, Erf 569, Plettenberg Bay 1. Introduction bluepebble independent environmental agency has been appointed by the landowner to submit an environmental sensitivity report for the proposed design and construction of a dwelling on Erf 569 located in the Keurboomstrand area of Plettenberg Bay. bluepebble has undertaken the commission in association with Nature Management Services (NMS) who have provided the specialist input for the sensitive site under investigation. The site in question is located on the Keurbaai property along the southern Cape coast between Plettenberg Bay and Keurboomstrand, as depicted in Figure 1. Figure 1: Locality Plan for Erf 569, Plettenberg Bay bluepebble independent environmental agency Construction of a dwelling on Erf 569, House Kovarsky, Keurboomstrand, Plettenberg Bay Basic Assessment Report Appendix G: Specialist Input 2. Methodology A desktop study using available information, and on-site inspections, were conducted to determine the conservation status, extent and health of vegetation on the property. Vegetation type and keystone species were mapped as the primary indicators of environmental sensitivity. The remnant of thicket on the site is very dense and almost impenetrable. -
Georgia Water Quality
GEORGIA SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT STRATEGY Okefenokee Swamp, Georgia PHOTO: Kathy Methier Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Watershed Protection Branch 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive Suite 1152, East Tower Atlanta, GA 30334 GEORGIA SURFACE WATER AND GROUND WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT STRATEGY 2015 Update PREFACE The Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GAEPD) of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) developed this document entitled “Georgia Surface Water and Groundwater Quality Monitoring and Assessment Strategy”. As a part of the State’s Water Quality Management Program, this report focuses on the GAEPD’s water quality monitoring efforts to address key elements identified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) monitoring strategy guidance entitled “Elements of a State Monitoring and Assessment Program, March 2003”. This report updates the State’s water quality monitoring strategy as required by the USEPA’s regulations addressing water management plans of the Clean Water Act, Section 106(e)(1). Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Watershed Protection Branch 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive Suite 1152, East Tower Atlanta, GA 30334 GEORGIA SURFACE WATER AND GROUND WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT STRATEGY 2015 Update TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................... -
WC Covid 19.Town and Suburb Data. 23 October 2020. for Publication.Xlsx
Western Cape.COVID-19 cases.Town and Subrb data. -
Monitoring Beach Changes As an Integral Component of Coastal Management
N° 15 Monitoring beach changes as an integral component of coastal management NVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT IN COASTAL REGIONS AND IN SMALL ISLANDS E Previous titles in the CSI info series: Titles in the CSI series Coastal region and small island papers: 1 Integrated framework for the management of beach resources 1 Managing beach resources in the smaller Caribbean islands. within the smaller caribbean islands. Workshop results. 1997. Workshop Papers. Edited by Gillian Cambers. 1997. 269 pp. 31 pp. (English only). www.unesco.org/csi/pub/info/pub2.htm (English only). www.unesco.org/csi/pub/papers/papers1.htm 2 UNESCO on coastal regions and small islands. Titles for 2 Coasts of Haiti. Resource assessment and management needs. management, research and capacity-building (1980–1995). 1997. 1998. 39 pp. (English and French). 21 pp. (English only). www.unesco.org/csi/pub/info/pub1.htm www.unesco.org/csi/pub/papers/papers2.htm www.unesco.org/csi/pub/papers/papiers2.htm 3 Qualité de l’eau de la nappe phréatique à Yeumbeul, Sénégal. Étude sur le terrain. 1997. 27 pp. (French only). 3 CARICOMP – Caribbean Coral Reef, Seagrass and Mangrove www.unesco.org/csi/pub/info/info3.htm Sites. Edited by Björn Kjerfve. 1999. 185 pp. (English only). www.unesco.org/csi/pub/papers/papers3.htm 4 Planning for coastline change. Guidelines for construction setbacks in the Eastern Caribbean Islands. 1997. 14 pp. 4 Applications of Satellite and Airborne Image Data to Coastal (English only). www.unesco.org/csi/pub/info/info4.htm Management. Seventh computer-based learning module. Edited by A. -
Coastal Management Lines for Eden District Project Report
Coastal Management Lines for Eden District Project Report July 2018 Coastal management lines for Eden District i DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Document title and version: Coastal Management Lines for Eden District: Project Report (March 2018) Project Name: The Technical Delineation of both the coastal management line; the EIA development set- back line as well as an audit of coastal access in the Eden District Municipality Client: Western Cape Government, Department of Environmental Affairs & Development Planning Royal HaskoningDHV reference number: MD2368 Authority reference: EADP1/2016 Authors: Royal HaskoningDHV Gerard van Weele Rafeeqah Alexander Dr. Keming Hu Dr. David Brew Nomcebo Hlanguza Katarzyna Bozek Bronwen Griffiths Coastwise Consulting Tandi Breetzke Acknowledgements: Western Cape Government Environmental Affairs & Development Planning Sub-directorate: Coastal Impact Management Directorate: Spatial Planning and Coastal Impact Management Email: [email protected] and Tel: 021 483 3370/2724 Appreciation is also expressed for all the contributions made by members of the public during the stakeholder engagement process, and the support received from the local municipalities of Hessequa, Mossel Bay, George, Knysna and Bitou, as well as Eden District Municipality. Date: July 2018 Coastal management lines for Eden District ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The coastal zone has always attracted people, whether for recreational purposes or for the natural resources that can be harvested from the coast or adjacent marine area. However, this concentration of people necessitates the concentration of developmental activities that are often in conflict with the natural dynamic nature of the coast or the biophysical sensitivities associated with the coastline. The Western Cape Government is under obligation to protect and preserve the inherent value of the Western Cape’s coastal zone. -
National List of Beaches 2008
National List of Beaches September 2008 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington DC 20460 EPA-823-R-08-004 Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 States Alabama........................................................................................................................................... 3 Alaska .............................................................................................................................................. 5 California.......................................................................................................................................... 6 Connecticut .................................................................................................................................... 15 Delaware........................................................................................................................................ 17 Florida ............................................................................................................................................ 18 Georgia .......................................................................................................................................... 31 Hawaii ............................................................................................................................................ 33 Illinois ............................................................................................................................................ -
Visual Impact Assessment Final Draft Report Ver
The Hillside Development Farm 1638 and Remainder Portion 82 of the farm Ruygte Valley 205, Knysna Sedgefield Visual Impact Assessment Final Draft Report ver. 1.4 February 2016 Prepared for: Liberty Lane Trading 111 PTY LTD c/o VPM Planning cc PO Box 173, Knysna, 6570 Prepared by: Megan Anderson Landscape Architect PO Box 517, Bredasdorp, 7280 Table of Contents CURRICULUM VITAE OF VISUAL SPECIALIST 4 DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 1. INTRODUCTION 12 1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE REPORT 12 1.2 TERMS OF REFERENCE 12 1.3 METHODOLOGY 13 1.4 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS 13 2. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 13 2.1 SITE LOCATION 14 2.2 DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION 16 2.2.1 THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE, THE HILL LAYOUT 11 16 2.2.2 ALTERNATIVE 1: THE HILL - LAYOUT 4 17 2.2.3 ALTERNATIVE 2: THE HILL - LAYOUT 9 18 2.3 APPLICABLE POLICIES, PLANS AND GUIDELINES 19 2.3.1 THE WESTERN CAPE PROVINCIAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (PSDF) 19 2.3.2 THE KNYSNA SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (SDF) 2008 19 2.3.3 THE COMPATIBILITY RULING MADE BY THE KNYSNA MUNICIPALITY SPECIFICALLY RELATED TO ‘THE HILL’ IN TERMS OF THE SDF. 19 2.3.4 DEA&DP GUIDELINE FOR MANAGEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT ON MOUNTAINS, HILLS & RIDGELINES 19 2.3.5 THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (EMF) FOR THE GARDEN ROUTE 20 2.3.6 HERITAGE AND SCENIC RESOURCES: INVENTORY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR THE WESTERN CAPE 21 3. VISUAL ASSESSMENT OF THE SITE AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 22 3.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFECTED AREA AND THE SCENIC RESOURCES 22 3.2 VISIBILITY OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 25 3.2.1 VIEW CATCHMENT 25 3.2.2 ZONE OF VISUAL INFLUENCE 26 3.3 RECEPTORS 27 3.4 VISUAL EXPOSURE 28 3.4.1 VIEW CORRIDORS 28 3.5 VISUAL SENSITIVITY 30 3.5.1 TOPOGRAPHY 30 3.5.2 LANDFORMS 30 3.5.3 VEGETATION COVER 31 3.5.4 SETTLEMENT PATTERNS 32 3.5.5 VISUAL SENSITIVITY 33 3.6 VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPACITY 3.7 VISUAL INTRUSION 37 The Hillside Development, Sedgefield VIA ver.1.4 Final Draft Report, February 2016 MALA 2 4. -
National List of Beaches 2004 (PDF)
National List of Beaches March 2004 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington DC 20460 EPA-823-R-04-004 i Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 States Alabama ............................................................................................................... 3 Alaska................................................................................................................... 6 California .............................................................................................................. 9 Connecticut .......................................................................................................... 17 Delaware .............................................................................................................. 21 Florida .................................................................................................................. 22 Georgia................................................................................................................. 36 Hawaii................................................................................................................... 38 Illinois ................................................................................................................... 45 Indiana.................................................................................................................. 47 Louisiana -
Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Lewis and Clark National Historical Park, Oregon and Washington
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resources Program Center Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Lewis and Clark National Historical Park, Oregon and Washington Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRTR—2007/055 ON THE COVER Upper left, Fort Clatsop, NPS Photograph Upper right, Cape Disappointment, Photograph by Kristen Keteles Center left, Ecola, NPS Photograph Lower left, Corps at Ecola, NPS Photograph Lower right, Young’s Bay, Photograph by Kristen Keteles Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Lewis and Clark National Historical Park, Oregon and Washington Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRTR—2007/055 Dr. Terrie Klinger School of Marine Affairs University of Washington Seattle, WA 98105-6715 Rachel M. Gregg School of Marine Affairs University of Washington Seattle, WA 98105-6715 Jessi Kershner School of Marine Affairs University of Washington Seattle, WA 98105-6715 Jill Coyle School of Marine Affairs University of Washington Seattle, WA 98105-6715 Dr. David Fluharty School of Marine Affairs University of Washington Seattle, WA 98105-6715 This report was prepared under Task Order J9W88040014 of the Pacific Northwest Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit (agreement CA9088A0008) September 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resources Program Center Fort Collins, CO i The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. -
El Chorlitejo Patinegro (Charadrius Alexandrinus) En Galicia Antes Y Después De La Catástrofe Del Prestige
TESE DE DOUTORAMENTO EL CHORLITEJO PATINEGRO (CHARADRIUS ALEXANDRINUS) EN GALICIA ANTES Y DESPUÉS DE LA CATÁSTROFE DEL PRESTIGE María Vidal Malde ZOOLOXÍA E ANTROPOLOXÍA FÍSICA/BIODIVERSIDADE E CONSERVACIÓN DO MEDIO NATURAL FACULTADE DE BIOLOXÍA SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA 2014 TESE DE DOUTORAMENTO EL CHORLITEJO PATINEGRO (CHARADRIUS ALEXANDRINUS) EN GALICIA ANTES Y DESPUÉS DE LA CATÁSTROFE DEL PRESTIGE Asdo........................................................ María Vidal Malde ZOOLOXÍA E ANTROPOLOXÍA FÍSICA/BIODIVERSIDADE E CONSERVACIÓN DO MEDIO NATURAL FACULTADE DE BIOLOXÍA SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA 2014 Prof. Dr. D. Jesús Domínguez Conde, como Director da tese titulada: “El Chorlitejo patinegro (Charadrius alexandrinus) en Galicia antes y después de la catástrofe del Prestige” Pola presente DECLARO: Que a tese presentada por Dna. María Vidal Malde é idónea para ser presentada, de acordo co artigo 41 do Regulamento de Estudos de Doutoramento, pola modalidade de compendio de ARTIGOS, nos que a doutoranda tivo participación no peso da investigación e a súa contribución foi decisiva para levar a cabo este traballo. E que está en coñecemento dos coautores, tanto doutores como non doutores, participantes nos artigos, que ningún dos traballos reunidos nesta tese serán presentados por ningún deles noutra tese de Doutoramento, o que asino baixo a miña responsabilidade. Santiago de Compostela, 1 de setembro de 2014 TABLA DE CONTENIDOS Agradecimientos INTRODUCCIÓN La especie 1 Vertidos petrolíferos y su incidencia en la avifauna marina y acuática 4 El desastre del Prestige 6 CAPÍTULO 1. Influence of researchers on the breeding success of Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus 19 CAPÍTULO 2. Lack of genetic structure in Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus from the Iberian coast.