DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluating Oregon's Beach Sites and Assessing Twenty-Six Coastal Beach Areas for Recreational Water Quality Standards

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluating Oregon's Beach Sites and Assessing Twenty-Six Coastal Beach Areas for Recreational Water Quality Standards AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Rae T. Benedict for the degree of Master of Science in Environmental Health Management presented on June 10. 2003. Title: Evaluating Oregon's Beach Sites and Assessing Twenty-Six Coastal Beach Areas for Recreational Water quality Standards. Redacted for privacy Abstract approved: Catherine M. Neumann With congressional passage of the BEACH Act in October of 2000, Coastal and Great Lakes states were mandated to assess coastal recreation waters for the application of ambient water quality standards. This research encompasses two components involved in applying the BEACH Act statues to Oregon. The first component was to select beach sites in Oregon. The second component involves applying bacterial recreational water standards to select Oregon beaches. Using the guidelines provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), this study develops a method to appraise Oregon marine recreational waters taking into account the following factors: use, available information, pollution threats, sanitary surveys, monitoring data, exposure considerations, economics, and development. In an effort to protect the public from swimming-associated illness attributable to microbial pollution, 24 beaches were identified in Oregon. Of these, 19 beaches were classified as tier 1, or high priority, and five sites were classifiedas medium priority, or tier 2. Future studies should be directed at ascertaining the beach lengths utilized by Oregon marine recreators since this is an important parameter in targeting bacterial monitoring. Ongoing monitoring of these 24 sites is warranted and new information could be used to update beach tier levels in Oregon. In the second phase of this study, bacterial monitoring data was used for comparison to recreational water quality standards. In October of 2002, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) sampled 26 beaches for enterococci andEscherichia coli (E. coli)densities. Of the water sampled from all 26 beach sites, nine exceeded s single sample maximum density of 104 enterococci colony forming units (cfu) per 100 milliLiters (mL). The Oregon beach with the highest exceedance occurred at Otter Rock's South Cove where the enterococci concentration was 4352 most probable number (MPN)/100 mL. A comparison of the 26 sampled beaches to ODEQ's estuarineE. colistandard of 406 organisms/100 mL resulted in two beaches with exceedances. Otter Rock at South Cove had the highest E. coliconcentration at 1850 IVIPN/100 mL. Based on the limited data used in this study, should Oregon adopt the enterococci standard in lieu of the current ODEQ estuarineE. colistandard, more beaches will have exceedances of the recreational water standard. Additional bacterial monitoring is warranted to further characterize the nature and extent of the problem in Oregon. To protect the health of the marine recreating public, future Oregon marine water quality studies should delineate the "no swim" zone around creeks and model the impacts of rainfall on beach sites. © Copyright by Rae T. Benedict June 10, 2003 All Rights Reserved Evaluating Oregon's Beach Sites and Assessing Twenty-Six Coastal Beach Areas for Recreational Water Quality Standards by Rae T. Benedict A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Presented June 10, 2003 Commencement June 2004 Master of Science thesis of Rae T. Benedict presented on June 10, 2003. APPROVED: Redacted for privacy Major Professor, representing Environmental Health Management Redacted for privacy Chair of the Department of Public Redacted for privacy Dean of the d'ttat'e School I understand that my thesis will become part of the permanent collection of Oregon State University libraries. My signature below authorizes release of my thesis to any reader upon request. Redacted for privacy Rae T. Benedict, Author ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author expresses sincere appreciation to the Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Section, as well as, the Oregon Department of Human Services, Environmental Services and Consultation Section. Special thanks to Who provided Dr Catherine Neumann, Oregon State Univ Applied research Mark Meyers, Oregon State Univ ArcView assistance Tanya Haddad, Oregon Land Conservation and Dev ArcView assistance Larry Caton, Oregon DEQ Ongoing data Oregon Department of Recreation Coastal Managers Information Kamie Carney, Florida Dept of Health State criteria Dana Solum, Santa Barbara County Environmental Health Services State criteria Lynn Schneider, Washington State Dept of Ecology State criteria Alaska Graduate funding & State criteria Ken Kauffman, Retired, Oregon DHS Assistance & Support This investigation was supported by an EPA Beach Grant awarded to Oregon Department of Human Services, Environmental Services Section. TABLE OF CONTENTS Pagç CHAPTER 1: GENERAL INTRODUCTION____________________1 1.1 EVENTS PRECEDING FEDERAL WATER LEGISLATION___________1 1.2 HISTORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH LEGISLATION PERTAINING TO WATER 3 1.3 RECREATIONAL WATER QUALITY CRITERIA BASED ON PRE-1986 BACTERIA STUDIES 4 1.4 BEACH RELATED STUDIES SINCE ADOPTION OF THE 1986 AMBIENT WATER QUALITY CRITERIA 6 1.5 PURPOSE OF RESEARCH 9 CHAPTER 2: EVALUATING OREGON'S BEACH SITES FOR APPLICATION TO UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY'S BEACH ACT CRITERIA 11 2.2INTRODUCTION___________________________________11 2.3METHODS 13 2.3.1 Use 17 2.3.2 Available Information 21 2.3.3 Pollution Threats 22 2.3.4 Sanitary Survey 24 2.3.5 Monitoring Data_____________________________________26 2.3.6 Exposure Considerations 28 2.3.7 Other Factors 28 2.3.8 Ranks and Tiers 29 2.4RESULTS 30 2.4.1 Use 30 2.4.2 Available Information 30 2.4.3 Pollution Threats 31 2.4.4 Sanitary Survey 32 2.4.5 Monitoring Data_______________________________________34 2.4.6 Exposure Considerations 35 2.4.7 Other Factors 37 2.4.8 Ranks and Tiers 37 2.5 DISCUSSION 43 2.5.1 Seasonal Listing of Sites 43 2.5.2 Density and Use of Oregon's Recreational Waters 43 2.5.3 Monitoring DataFecal Coliform Conversion to E. coli 44 2.5.4 Other Factors 46 2.5.5 Pollution Sources and Sanitary Surveys 46 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Page 2.5.6 Comparing Oregon's Beach Selection Criteria with Other States_ 47 2.5.7 Tiers Revisited 49 2.5.8 Oregon 2003 Beach Information 50 2.6REFERENCES 54 CHAPTER 3: ASSESSING OREGON'S TWENTY-SIX COASTAL BEACH AREAS FOR RECREATIONAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS______ 58 3.2INTRODUCTION 59 3.3 METHODS 64 3.4RESULTS 68 3.4.1 E.coli Results 70 3.4.2 Enterococci Results 71 3.4.3 Indicator Comparison to Regulatory Action 73 3.5DISCUSSION 73 3.5.1 Creeks Transporting Bacterial Pollution 74 3.5.2 Rainfall Effects on Bacterial Concentrations___________________74 3.5.3 Proximity to Sewage Treatment Plants and Other Point Sources 76 3.5.4 Storage Effects on Bacterial Samples 77 3.5.5 Enterolert Analysis______________________________________77 3.5.6 E. coliversus Enterococci 78 3.5.7 Regulatory Action Results Compared with Other Studies_______80 3.5.8 Oregon Department of Agriculture Monitoring_______________80 3.6CONCLUSION 81 3.7RECOMMENDATIONS 82 3.8 REFERENCES 84 CHAPTER 4: GENERAL CONCLUSION BIBLIOGRAPHY 91 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1 Diagram of Arch Cape STP Hydro-code 17 2.2 Map of Newport Beach Sites Potentially Impacted by STP 2.3 Map of Oregon Tiered Beaches in Clatsop, Tillamook & Lincoln Counties 41 2.4 Map of Oregon Tiered Beaches in Lane, Douglas, Coos & Cuny Counties 42 3.1 Map of Sample Points Along Cannon Beach, Oregon 3.2 Map of Oregon Sampled Beaches by Tier Levels 67 3.3 Map of Oregon Beach Sites with E. coli and Enterococci Exceedances 72 3.4 Picture of Otter Rock at South Cove Headland 75 LIST OF TABLES Table ige 2.1 Information Used in Site Selection 15 2.2 Coastal County Sanitarian Survey 18 2.3 Oregon Beaches by Exposure and Activity 31 2.4 Oregon STP Pollution Threats with Hydro-code and Potentially Impacted Beaches 33 2.5 Monitoring Data Exceeding ODEQ Estuarine Standard__________________ 35 2.6 Oregon Beaches by Total Score, Final Rank & Tier Level 38 2.7 Comparison of Oregon Beach Tiers 51 3.1 1986 Water Quality Criteria for Bacterial Densities 61 3.2 Bacterial Densities in Oregon Beach Waters Sampled in October 2002 68 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS cfu- colony forming units E. coli- Escherichia coli EPA- Environmental Protection Agency LDC- Oregon Land Conservation and Development Mem- Memorial mL- milliliter Mtn- Mountain ODA- Oregon Department of Agriculture ODEQ- Oregon Department of Environmental Quality ODHS- Oregon Department of Human Services OPR- Oregon Parks and Recreation Department OSRUS- Oregon Shore Recreational Use Study Pk- Park Quad- quadrangle Rec- Recreational St- State STP(s) Sewage Treatment Plant (s) TMDL- Total Maximum Daily Loads USD01 United States Department of Interior USEPA- Environmental Protection Agency USGS United States Geological Survey EVALUATING OREGON'S BEACH SITES AND ASSESSING TWENTY-SIX COASTAL BEACH AREAS FOR RECREATIONAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS CHAPTER 1: GENERAL INTRODUCTION While this document is primarily focused on the federal regulation surrounding recreational water quality and application of bacterial standards to Oregon beaches; drinking, wastewater, and beach regulation have relevance. This is perhaps most transparent in the events preceding regulation. Holistically, any water legislation pertaining to control of microbial contaminants is applicable to discussion when speaking of the events leading to recreational water quality standards. 1.1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ocean Shore Management Plan
    Ocean Shore Management Plan Oregon Parks and Recreation Department January 2005 Ocean Shore Management Plan Oregon Parks and Recreation Department January 2005 Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Planning Section 725 Summer Street NE Suite C Salem Oregon 97301 Kathy Schutt: Project Manager Contributions by OPRD staff: Michelle Michaud Terry Bergerson Nancy Niedernhofer Jean Thompson Robert Smith Steve Williams Tammy Baumann Coastal Area and Park Managers Table of Contents Planning for Oregon’s Ocean Shore: Executive Summary .......................................................................... 1 Chapter One Introduction.................................................................................................................. 9 Chapter Two Ocean Shore Management Goals.............................................................................19 Chapter Three Balancing the Demands: Natural Resource Management .......................................23 Chapter Four Balancing the Demands: Cultural/Historic Resource Management .........................29 Chapter Five Balancing the Demands: Scenic Resource Management.........................................33 Chapter Six Balancing the Demands: Recreational Use and Management .................................39 Chapter Seven Beach Access............................................................................................................57 Chapter Eight Beach Safety .............................................................................................................71
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Water Quality
    GEORGIA SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT STRATEGY Okefenokee Swamp, Georgia PHOTO: Kathy Methier Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Watershed Protection Branch 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive Suite 1152, East Tower Atlanta, GA 30334 GEORGIA SURFACE WATER AND GROUND WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT STRATEGY 2015 Update PREFACE The Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GAEPD) of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) developed this document entitled “Georgia Surface Water and Groundwater Quality Monitoring and Assessment Strategy”. As a part of the State’s Water Quality Management Program, this report focuses on the GAEPD’s water quality monitoring efforts to address key elements identified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) monitoring strategy guidance entitled “Elements of a State Monitoring and Assessment Program, March 2003”. This report updates the State’s water quality monitoring strategy as required by the USEPA’s regulations addressing water management plans of the Clean Water Act, Section 106(e)(1). Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Watershed Protection Branch 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive Suite 1152, East Tower Atlanta, GA 30334 GEORGIA SURFACE WATER AND GROUND WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT STRATEGY 2015 Update TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Beach Changes As an Integral Component of Coastal Management
    N° 15 Monitoring beach changes as an integral component of coastal management NVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT IN COASTAL REGIONS AND IN SMALL ISLANDS E Previous titles in the CSI info series: Titles in the CSI series Coastal region and small island papers: 1 Integrated framework for the management of beach resources 1 Managing beach resources in the smaller Caribbean islands. within the smaller caribbean islands. Workshop results. 1997. Workshop Papers. Edited by Gillian Cambers. 1997. 269 pp. 31 pp. (English only). www.unesco.org/csi/pub/info/pub2.htm (English only). www.unesco.org/csi/pub/papers/papers1.htm 2 UNESCO on coastal regions and small islands. Titles for 2 Coasts of Haiti. Resource assessment and management needs. management, research and capacity-building (1980–1995). 1997. 1998. 39 pp. (English and French). 21 pp. (English only). www.unesco.org/csi/pub/info/pub1.htm www.unesco.org/csi/pub/papers/papers2.htm www.unesco.org/csi/pub/papers/papiers2.htm 3 Qualité de l’eau de la nappe phréatique à Yeumbeul, Sénégal. Étude sur le terrain. 1997. 27 pp. (French only). 3 CARICOMP – Caribbean Coral Reef, Seagrass and Mangrove www.unesco.org/csi/pub/info/info3.htm Sites. Edited by Björn Kjerfve. 1999. 185 pp. (English only). www.unesco.org/csi/pub/papers/papers3.htm 4 Planning for coastline change. Guidelines for construction setbacks in the Eastern Caribbean Islands. 1997. 14 pp. 4 Applications of Satellite and Airborne Image Data to Coastal (English only). www.unesco.org/csi/pub/info/info4.htm Management. Seventh computer-based learning module. Edited by A.
    [Show full text]
  • Erosion and Flood Hazard Map of the Moolack Beach Area, Coastal
    STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES Suite 965, 800 NE Oregon St., #28 Portland, Oregon 97232 OPEN-FILE REPORT 0-97-1 1 COASTAL SHORELINE CHANGE STUDY NORTHERN AND CENTRAL LINCOLN COUNTY, OREGON Prepared by George R. Priest Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries November 1997 NQTICE The Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries is publishing this paper because the information furthers the mission of the Department. To facilitate timely distribution of the information this report has not been edited to our usual standards. CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 1 2. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................................2 3 . ANALYTICAL METHOD ..............................................................................................................................5 3.1 IvfM'PING THE EROSIONREFERENCE FEATURE ............................................................................................5 3.2 WINGTHE 60-YEARPOSITION OF THE ERF............................................................................................ 6 3.2.1 Shorelines Without Shoreline Protection Structures (SPS)................................................................ 6 3.2.2 Shorelines With SPS ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Beaches 2008
    National List of Beaches September 2008 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington DC 20460 EPA-823-R-08-004 Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 States Alabama........................................................................................................................................... 3 Alaska .............................................................................................................................................. 5 California.......................................................................................................................................... 6 Connecticut .................................................................................................................................... 15 Delaware........................................................................................................................................ 17 Florida ............................................................................................................................................ 18 Georgia .......................................................................................................................................... 31 Hawaii ............................................................................................................................................ 33 Illinois ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Beaches 2004 (PDF)
    National List of Beaches March 2004 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington DC 20460 EPA-823-R-04-004 i Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 States Alabama ............................................................................................................... 3 Alaska................................................................................................................... 6 California .............................................................................................................. 9 Connecticut .......................................................................................................... 17 Delaware .............................................................................................................. 21 Florida .................................................................................................................. 22 Georgia................................................................................................................. 36 Hawaii................................................................................................................... 38 Illinois ................................................................................................................... 45 Indiana.................................................................................................................. 47 Louisiana
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 60, I'lum6eit , JAN /Feb Me
    OREGON GEOLOGY published by the Oregon Deportment of Geology and Mineral Industries OREGON GEOLOGY Barnett appointed to OOGAMI Governing Board --VOlUME 60, i'lUM6EIt , JAN /fEB Me... N. Barnett at Pa1Iond ho.I bMn oppoinl8d b)' c:.o... .... 10M 16tz1lo ... ."d ....1.rnMI by !he Or."", ...... ... .. -~....... " "" _..-.-- _-_._--_ - .. .. '--. S,n." lor • fOUl-year Ie!m be""'" OKombel " _"'.eI ,"7, 0$ c.c:-mIn, 1\oaI,j ".,..,w.., of ,110 Ole,,,,, -~ o.pll"",nt aI c.doC one! Mlnaol Induwles --- , ~. - (OOCoAMl) Bornoort ."a: .." John W. S\olJl~ '" _.- -_-- ..... Pa1Iond • .me....-..d two f""' - ~ _.., Ihe Go.<- --. _u_- --~- """"...... d ----______- - .. ~ ... _. ... _.>m. ......... ,... ... ........ - ---- _ 1oIoM.,.,- ... _ ,, -""'"'+ .......,0>, ... '"___ cc,.", .. _ ...' , """.~ ""1>'11 .n-, - ~- ,...,...-..... .. ,_.c:.- .......... ---__ (0'1" ''''''''_lM'I . ,. ,, ~ -,--~. " ~ -., W»o-~ _IM',_->cuo' -- .... I"",. ..... _ "'" ....... ....._ _-..., r-__.. , , ':--,--.. ,1>._ .- ..._ _.. ........ _ -...m.I>W __ .n-".., .... _"'Jr--. -",--....,-- ..._., , AriHoI It. "tftOft ,...I"-_.. ,_..,. ___ u , _ , -, ... ..... .. "' .... .............. .......... BlIlIOn Is tho M.".,. 01 1"- Humon ~ - ""-__",-_._- . ,,,._.nn_ .. _. _ __ ot _- •.. ...... OpeI.lioN 00tp0." ......1 01 PortIa..a General E~1c Company (PGEJ. $110 ".. bftn wo<ldn, .mt. P'GE oIr>e. '918. mostly ... ........,..,. /v..ctloro. ",,j _.'_'_._-""'_--~"'----"--.""-"--"'"_._- ___ ".... _ _ ' F........ p''"''''''"''"''tIy ... II>e .." af ........., RQoourcn. Silo _ .... _.. __ .. _R__ .. _• ott.odod "-PP-.... ~ one! " .....Iod hom AbiIono Chnstian 1..Wvoni1y 11\ .... Shoo 10 rrwrI.cI 0IId : -_ .. __ .. ..... two -.,..I ~... She Is .., Itw M,->, -----""'---........ .. .-_ -- CcundI 01 INS. alia, Asmy Gt-v..... .. and""- --,.-_............ -_--- 11\ IN """" ".ObtIy 01 r.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Lewis and Clark National Historical Park, Oregon and Washington
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resources Program Center Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Lewis and Clark National Historical Park, Oregon and Washington Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRTR—2007/055 ON THE COVER Upper left, Fort Clatsop, NPS Photograph Upper right, Cape Disappointment, Photograph by Kristen Keteles Center left, Ecola, NPS Photograph Lower left, Corps at Ecola, NPS Photograph Lower right, Young’s Bay, Photograph by Kristen Keteles Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Lewis and Clark National Historical Park, Oregon and Washington Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRTR—2007/055 Dr. Terrie Klinger School of Marine Affairs University of Washington Seattle, WA 98105-6715 Rachel M. Gregg School of Marine Affairs University of Washington Seattle, WA 98105-6715 Jessi Kershner School of Marine Affairs University of Washington Seattle, WA 98105-6715 Jill Coyle School of Marine Affairs University of Washington Seattle, WA 98105-6715 Dr. David Fluharty School of Marine Affairs University of Washington Seattle, WA 98105-6715 This report was prepared under Task Order J9W88040014 of the Pacific Northwest Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit (agreement CA9088A0008) September 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resources Program Center Fort Collins, CO i The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • El Chorlitejo Patinegro (Charadrius Alexandrinus) En Galicia Antes Y Después De La Catástrofe Del Prestige
    TESE DE DOUTORAMENTO EL CHORLITEJO PATINEGRO (CHARADRIUS ALEXANDRINUS) EN GALICIA ANTES Y DESPUÉS DE LA CATÁSTROFE DEL PRESTIGE María Vidal Malde ZOOLOXÍA E ANTROPOLOXÍA FÍSICA/BIODIVERSIDADE E CONSERVACIÓN DO MEDIO NATURAL FACULTADE DE BIOLOXÍA SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA 2014 TESE DE DOUTORAMENTO EL CHORLITEJO PATINEGRO (CHARADRIUS ALEXANDRINUS) EN GALICIA ANTES Y DESPUÉS DE LA CATÁSTROFE DEL PRESTIGE Asdo........................................................ María Vidal Malde ZOOLOXÍA E ANTROPOLOXÍA FÍSICA/BIODIVERSIDADE E CONSERVACIÓN DO MEDIO NATURAL FACULTADE DE BIOLOXÍA SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA 2014 Prof. Dr. D. Jesús Domínguez Conde, como Director da tese titulada: “El Chorlitejo patinegro (Charadrius alexandrinus) en Galicia antes y después de la catástrofe del Prestige” Pola presente DECLARO: Que a tese presentada por Dna. María Vidal Malde é idónea para ser presentada, de acordo co artigo 41 do Regulamento de Estudos de Doutoramento, pola modalidade de compendio de ARTIGOS, nos que a doutoranda tivo participación no peso da investigación e a súa contribución foi decisiva para levar a cabo este traballo. E que está en coñecemento dos coautores, tanto doutores como non doutores, participantes nos artigos, que ningún dos traballos reunidos nesta tese serán presentados por ningún deles noutra tese de Doutoramento, o que asino baixo a miña responsabilidade. Santiago de Compostela, 1 de setembro de 2014 TABLA DE CONTENIDOS Agradecimientos INTRODUCCIÓN La especie 1 Vertidos petrolíferos y su incidencia en la avifauna marina y acuática 4 El desastre del Prestige 6 CAPÍTULO 1. Influence of researchers on the breeding success of Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus 19 CAPÍTULO 2. Lack of genetic structure in Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus from the Iberian coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Milebymile.Com Personal Road Trip Guide Oregon Byway Highway # "Pacific Coast Scenic Byway - Oregon"
    MileByMile.com Personal Road Trip Guide Oregon Byway Highway # "Pacific Coast Scenic Byway - Oregon" Miles ITEM SUMMARY 0.0 Brookings, Oregon Brookings, Oregon, located on the West coast of the USA, along the Pacific Ocean. Winter Art & Chocolate Festival, is a famous festival held in Brookings, Oregon on the second weekend of February, when local and regional artists and chocolatiers perform. The Brookings Harbor Festival of the Arts, takes place the third weekend in August on the Boardwalk at the Port of Brookings Harbor. This is where Pacific Coast Scenic Byway starts its northerly run on the south towards Astoria, Oregon. This byway provides amazing coastal scenery, passes through agricultural valleys and brushes against wind-sculpted dunes, clings to seaside cliffs, and winds by estuarine marshes. Along the route are small towns, historic bridges and lighthouses, museums, overlooks, and state parks. 1.2 Brookings Airport Parkview Drive, Beach Avenue, Brookings Airport, a public airport located northeast of the city of Brookings in Curry County, Oregon, Garvins Heliport, a private heliport located north of Brookings in Curry County, Oregon, 1.3 Harris Beach State Park, Harris Beach State Park, an Oregon State Park located on US Highway 101, north of Brookings. Harris Beach State Park is home to Bird Island (also known as Goat Island), which is reported to be the largest island off the Oregon Coast and is a National Wildlife Refuge. 2.2 Carpenterville Road Carpenterville Road, Forest Wayside State Park, 3.5 Samuel H. Board State Samuel H. Boardman State Scenic Corridor, a linear state park in Scenic Corridor southwestern Oregon, It is a twelve miles long and thickly forested along steep and rugged coastline with a few small sand beaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Directors Meeting and Educational Conference November 7-9, 2002 MINUTES
    Board of Directors Meeting and Educational Conference November 7-9, 2002 MINUTES The Best Western Inn of Chicago 162 East Ohio Street Chicago, IL MEETING SPONSORS Lead Sponsor Medtronic Physio-Control AEDs Presenting Sponsors Laerdal Kiefer Wahoo Philips Heartstart AEDs Chammy Meeting Sponsors The Victor Swimwear Jobeedu Marine Rescue Products Board of Directors Meeting and Educational Conference November 7-9, 2002 MINUTES The Best Western Inn of Chicago 162 East Ohio Street Chicago, IL MEETING SPONSORS Lead Sponsor Medtronic Physio-Control AEDs Presenting Sponsors Laerdal Kiefer Wahoo Philips Heartstart AEDs Chammy Meeting Sponsors The Victor Swimwear Jobeedu Marine Rescue Products MINUTES Thursday, November 7, 2002 BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING: - 9:00 a.m. I. CALL TO ORDER - Mr. Rohrer A. Pledge of Allegiance - Mr. Gavin B. Welcome and Introductions - Mr. Rohrer C. Roll Call of Delegates - Mr. Shotwell DELEGATE VOTES BASED ON MEMBERSHIP NOVEMBER 7, 2002 NOVEMBER 7, 2002 MEMBERS VOTES PRESENT PROXY TOTAL JUNIORS NEW ENGLAND 46 2 0001 MID ATLANTIC 1001 7 7 0 7 640 SOUTH ATLANTIC 919 7 70788 SOUTH EAST 238 4 2 2 4 150 GREAT LAKES 618 6 60652 GULF COAST 83 2 2 0 2 122 NORTHWEST 152 3 2131 SOUTHWEST 1229 7 7 0 7 3268 SUB TOTALS 4286 38 33 3 36 4322 NATIONAL (AT LARGE) 24 2/3 = 24 VOTES MAJORITY =19 VOTES 2 TOTALS 4310 4324 II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Motion by Mr. Beuerlein, seconded by Ms Wiederhold, to approve the agenda as distributed by the secretary. The Motion was passed unanimously. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES, A motion by Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Erosion and Flood Hazard Map of the Moolack-Agate Beach Area, Coastal
    STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES Suite 965, 800 NE Oregon St., #28 Portland, Oregon 97232 OPEN-FILE REPORT 0-97-1 1 COASTAL SHORELINE CHANGE STUDY NORTHERN AND CENTRAL LINCOLN COUNTY, OREGON Prepared by George R. Priest Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries November 1997 NQTICE The Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries is publishing this paper because the information furthers the mission of the Department. To facilitate timely distribution of the information this report has not been edited to our usual standards. CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 1 2. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................................2 3 . ANALYTICAL METHOD ..............................................................................................................................5 3.1 IvfM'PING THE EROSIONREFERENCE FEATURE ............................................................................................5 3.2 WINGTHE 60-YEARPOSITION OF THE ERF............................................................................................ 6 3.2.1 Shorelines Without Shoreline Protection Structures (SPS)................................................................ 6 3.2.2 Shorelines With SPS ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]