Alexander Der Grosse En

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alexander Der Grosse En Alexander the Great copyright PM Perspektive, by Peter Boccarius No other conqueror was so young and at the same time so powerful. How did Alexander the Great manage to found a world empire in only ten years? Here an attempt to find out in six questions and answers. Who was Alexander? He was considered to be cruel, egocentric, hungry for power and overbearing. Anyone who got in the way of the richest and most powerful king in the world had to pay with his life. Dissidents he had tortured and executed on the slightest suspicion. That is one side of Alexander as given by many historians. Others, however, see him as a romantic, stressing his sentimental and sensitive side. Thus he is said to have passionately loved his wife Roxana and to have mourned his companion-in-arms Hephaestion by his deathbed for days and nights. Yet much is speculation. One things is certain: Aristotle, his teacher, fired enthusiasm in Princess Olympia's son for Homer's heroes and for art. Homer's epic of the Trojan War was his favourite reading; Achilles became his favourite hero and model. Alexander was restless, had deep yearnings, wanderlust and was driven by his energy. How did Alexander become a conqueror? His father, Philip II of Macedonia, had already prepared Alexander's career: he had subjugated the Greeks, who until then had ridiculed the Macedonians as uncivilized "barbarians". Philip's dominion extended from the coast of Dalmatia in the west and from the lower reaches of the Danube in the north and across the south of Greece as far as the Aegean islands. All that was inherited by Alexander, who was born in Pella in 356 BC. After Philip's assassination, the 20-year-old youth had himself proclaimed king. Any rivals were arrested or killed in good time. A powerful army inherited from his father also stood him in good stead. Alexander was revered as a divine offspring and was thought to be invincible. Long before Alexander, Greece was threatened and occupied by the Persians. The hatred for this people had deep roots. His father had promised to liberate the Greeks – and Alexander was to keep his father's promise. In spring 334 BC he set off with 35,000 soldiers. The plan to conquer this empire seemed mad. Persia was about fifty times larger than Alexander's domain. While the Persian king, Darius, had the best mariners in the ancient world – the Phoenicians - at his disposal, Alexander's fleet was insignificant. So his plans were based completely on the striking force of a land power. Darius did not take the 21-year-old youth seriously, when he crossed the Hellespont to Persia. He left it to his satraps in Asia Minor to cope with the intruder. In May 334 BC fighting broke out on the River Granicus (modern Kocabas) in north-west Anatolia. To everyone's surprise the man from Macedonia was victorious. This raised the morale of Alexander's troops. But in Gordium, the capital of the Phrygians, the way was barred at first. Gordius, founder of the empire and builder of the town, had so intricately tied the yoke and shaft with a raffia to his chariot that it was impossible to see either the end or beginning of the knot. The oracle promised anyone who managed to loosen it that he would one !1 von !3 www.sunflower.ch day rule over Asia. Alexander is said to have wasted no time and to have cut through the Gordian knot with a stroke of his sword. The way to Asia was open to him. What tactics did Alexander use to win? In autumn 334 BC there was the famous Battle of Issus against Darius III. It was sheer madness to oppose the Persian king, who had a far greater army at his disposal. But the young Macedonian king galloped like a madman towards the chariot of the Persian ruler, who turned and fled. When the Persian's soldiers saw that, they followed the example of their supreme commander and dispersed. Alexander conquered a war treasure that ensured his soldiers' pay for long to come. Although relatively small, his army was extremely manoeuvrable. The main bulk was made up of the phalanx (some 18,000 men), heavily armed with helmets, shields and spears and protected by suits of armour. In addition, there was the cavalry, about 5,000 strong, also heavily armed and thus superior to the light Persian horsemen. Alexander developed completely new tactics of attack. Hitherto the phalanx had rushed at the enemy's rows head on. The 23-year-old Macedonian surprised his opponents: he ordered his left army flank, covered by the cavalry, to storm into the weak spot of the enemy's troops in a wedge- shaped formation. Alexander himself fought in the front line with his soldiers. He was often the first to charge the enemy, thus carrying his men with him. He was so successful at motivating them that they often held out in spite of punishing marches and harsh deprivations. What was Alexander's goal? Alexander occupied Phoenicia and carried on to Egypt. There he founded Alexandria, which finally became the trading centre and cultural metropolis of the ancient world. And he triumphed a second time over Darius. This time in the battle of Guagamela in 331 BC. While still on the battlefield he had himself proclaimed King of Asia – as successor to the Persian ruler. Actually he had thus completed the tasks he had set himself. He had avenged the Greeks and forced the Persian Empire to its knees. But Alexander was a restless man, and he found idling intolerable. Even in the army's winter quarters something always had to be going on: sporting competitions, parades and march-pasts, sacrificing to the gods. His mission as avenger was over. Now followed Alexander's personal campaign of conquest. The now most powerful and wealthy king in the world wanted to rule over a domain that extended to the end of the world. And at those times this was thought to lie beyond the Hindu Kush mountains (in present-day Afghanistan). There, it was said, the world went over into the boundless sea. So Alexander set off with his army. When the troops had crossed the Hindu Kush, they realized that the world was larger than had been assumed. Alexander pressed on further, but at the River Hyphasis (today Beas in Pakistan) the emaciated warriors, who by now were 5000 kilometres from their Macedonian homeland, refused to carry on. Alexander had to turn back. Why did the conqueror of the world give up? He could have forced his army to move on. He did not do so, but returned. There is no clear explanation for this change of heart. ! !2 von !3 www.sunflower.ch In the meantime Alexander was the ruler over a territory extending from the Danube to the Nile and to the east as far as India. To govern this gigantic empire he needed more soldiers and administrative officials than the Macedonians and Greeks could provide him with. It was only through fusing with the Persian peoples that this problem could be solved. Alexander legalized, as it is called, 10,000 partnerships of his soldiers with their oriental lovers. As a clear sign of conciliation with the former enemy nation Alexander arranged a mass marriage ceremony in Susa in spring 324 BC. He himself was already married to Roxana, a Bactrian princess. Now he also took the eldest daughter of Darius, who had died in the meantime, as his wife as well as King Artaxerxes III's youngest daughter. The splendid wedding festivities were celebrated in the king's tent for five days. This event was at the same time a symbol of the end of Alexander's campaign of conquest in the Orient. Where and how did Alexander die? Even after making peace with the Persians, Alexander still hungered for power. He had big plans. In Babylon, which he made the capital of his empire in 324 BC, he had a harbour built. A system of canals was to irrigate the land with water from the Euphrates and Tigris. But above all Alexander wanted to conquer the most powerful port towns in the western Mediterranean region, as his empire had not yet reached the furthest border to the west, as had been planned. But this undertaking came to nothing. On the evening of 10th July 323 BC Alexander the Great died at the age of 33. The cause of death was probably malaria or pneumonia. It is still not clear where Alexander's mortal remains lie. They were reportedly taken to Alexandria in Egypt. But no one knows for certain. For many of his followers there was only one explanation: Alexander, who during his lifetime was revered like a god, ascended to the gods in heaven. The ruler had died without leaving an heir. His successors (Diadochen) began to dismantle his huge empire. Although Alexander's idea of a multicultural society did not gain acceptance, it was the beginning of the "Hellenistic" age that would endure for three centuries. In the time after Alexander's death architecture, philosophy, art and politics remained largely Greek, even in the Persian Empire. Alexander himself had founded many cities as military bases during his life, said to be no fewer than 70. They became a stronghold of Hellenistic culture. And Greek became the worlds’ lingua franca.. !3 von !3 www.sunflower.ch.
Recommended publications
  • T C K a P R (E F C Bc): C P R
    ELECTRUM * Vol. 23 (2016): 25–49 doi: 10.4467/20800909EL.16.002.5821 www.ejournals.eu/electrum T C K A P R (E F C BC): C P R S1 Christian Körner Universität Bern For Andreas Mehl, with deep gratitude Abstract: At the end of the eighth century, Cyprus came under Assyrian control. For the follow- ing four centuries, the Cypriot monarchs were confronted with the power of the Near Eastern empires. This essay focuses on the relations between the Cypriot kings and the Near Eastern Great Kings from the eighth to the fourth century BC. To understand these relations, two theoretical concepts are applied: the centre-periphery model and the concept of suzerainty. From the central perspective of the Assyrian and Persian empires, Cyprus was situated on the western periphery. Therefore, the local governing traditions were respected by the Assyrian and Persian masters, as long as the petty kings fulfi lled their duties by paying tributes and providing military support when requested to do so. The personal relationship between the Cypriot kings and their masters can best be described as one of suzerainty, where the rulers submitted to a superior ruler, but still retained some autonomy. This relationship was far from being stable, which could lead to manifold mis- understandings between centre and periphery. In this essay, the ways in which suzerainty worked are discussed using several examples of the relations between Cypriot kings and their masters. Key words: Assyria, Persia, Cyprus, Cypriot kings. At the end of the fourth century BC, all the Cypriot kingdoms vanished during the wars of Alexander’s successors Ptolemy and Antigonus, who struggled for control of the is- land.
    [Show full text]
  • VU Research Portal
    VU Research Portal The impact of empire on market prices in Babylon Pirngruber, R. 2012 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) Pirngruber, R. (2012). The impact of empire on market prices in Babylon: in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 - 140 B.C. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 THE IMPACT OF EMPIRE ON MARKET PRICES IN BABYLON in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 – 140 B.C. R. Pirngruber VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT THE IMPACT OF EMPIRE ON MARKET PRICES IN BABYLON in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 – 140 B.C. ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, op gezag van de rector magnificus prof.dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sweep of History
    STUDENT’S World History & Geography 1 1 1 Essentials of World History to 1500 Ver. 3.1.10 – Rev. 2/1/2011 WHG1 The following pages describe significant people, places, events, and concepts in the story of humankind. This information forms the core of our study; it will be fleshed-out by classroom discussions, audio-visual mat erials, readings, writings, and other act ivit ies. This knowledge will help you understand how the world works and how humans behave. It will help you understand many of the books, news reports, films, articles, and events you will encounter throughout the rest of your life. The Student’s Friend World History & Geography 1 Essentials of world history to 1500 History What is history? History is the story of human experience. Why study history? History shows us how the world works and how humans behave. History helps us make judgments about current and future events. History affects our lives every day. History is a fascinating story of human treachery and achievement. Geography What is geography? Geography is the study of interaction between humans and the environment. Why study geography? Geography is a major factor affecting human development. Humans are a major factor affecting our natural environment. Geography affects our lives every day. Geography helps us better understand the peoples of the world. CONTENTS: Overview of history Page 1 Some basic concepts Page 2 Unit 1 - Origins of the Earth and Humans Page 3 Unit 2 - Civilization Arises in Mesopotamia & Egypt Page 5 Unit 3 - Civilization Spreads East to India & China Page 9 Unit 4 - Civilization Spreads West to Greece & Rome Page 13 Unit 5 - Early Middle Ages: 500 to 1000 AD Page 17 Unit 6 - Late Middle Ages: 1000 to 1500 AD Page 21 Copyright © 1998-2011 Michael G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander's Empire
    4 Alexander’s Empire MAIN IDEA WHY IT MATTERS NOW TERMS & NAMES EMPIRE BUILDING Alexander the Alexander’s empire extended • Philip II •Alexander Great conquered Persia and Egypt across an area that today consists •Macedonia the Great and extended his empire to the of many nations and diverse • Darius III Indus River in northwest India. cultures. SETTING THE STAGE The Peloponnesian War severely weakened several Greek city-states. This caused a rapid decline in their military and economic power. In the nearby kingdom of Macedonia, King Philip II took note. Philip dreamed of taking control of Greece and then moving against Persia to seize its vast wealth. Philip also hoped to avenge the Persian invasion of Greece in 480 B.C. TAKING NOTES Philip Builds Macedonian Power Outlining Use an outline to organize main ideas The kingdom of Macedonia, located just north of Greece, about the growth of had rough terrain and a cold climate. The Macedonians were Alexander's empire. a hardy people who lived in mountain villages rather than city-states. Most Macedonian nobles thought of themselves Alexander's Empire as Greeks. The Greeks, however, looked down on the I. Philip Builds Macedonian Power Macedonians as uncivilized foreigners who had no great A. philosophers, sculptors, or writers. The Macedonians did have one very B. important resource—their shrewd and fearless kings. II. Alexander Conquers Persia Philip’s Army In 359 B.C., Philip II became king of Macedonia. Though only 23 years old, he quickly proved to be a brilliant general and a ruthless politician. Philip transformed the rugged peasants under his command into a well-trained professional army.
    [Show full text]
  • The Second After the King and Achaemenid Bactria on Classical Sources
    The Second after the King and Achaemenid Bactria on Classical Sources MANEL GARCÍA SÁNCHEZ Universidad de Barcelona–CEIPAC* ABSTRACT The government of the Achaemenid Satrapy of Bactria is frequently associated in Classical sources with the Second after the King. Although this relationship did not happen in all the cases of succession to the Achaemenid throne, there is no doubt that the Bactrian government considered it valuable and important both for the stability of the Empire and as a reward for the loser in the succession struggle to the Achaemenid throne. KEYWORDS Achaemenid succession – Achaemenid Bactria – Achaemenid Kingship Crown Princes – porphyrogenesis Beyond the tradition that made of Zoroaster the and harem royal intrigues among the successors King of the Bactrians, Rege Bactrianorum, qui to the throne in the Achaemenid Empire primus dicitur artes magicas invenisse (Justinus (Shahbazi 1993; García Sánchez 2005; 2009, 1.1.9), Classical sources sometimes relate the 155–175). It is in this context where we might Satrapy of Bactria –the Persian Satrapy included find some explicit references to the reward for Sogdiana as well (Briant 1984, 71; Briant 1996, the prince who lost the succession dispute: the 403 s.)– along with the princes of the offer of the government of Bactria as a Achaemenid royal family and especially with compensation for the damage done after not the ruled out prince in the succession, the having been chosen as a successor of the Great second in line to the throne, sometimes King (Sancisi–Weerdenburg 1980, 122–139; appointed in the sources as “the second after the Briant 1984, 69–80).
    [Show full text]
  • Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean Culture
    ANTONIJE SHKOKLJEV SLAVE NIKOLOVSKI - KATIN PREHISTORY CENTRAL BALKANS CRADLE OF AEGEAN CULTURE Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture By Antonije Shkokljev Slave Nikolovski – Katin Translated from Macedonian to English and edited By Risto Stefov Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2013 by Antonije Shkokljev, Slave Nikolovski – Katin & Risto Stefov e-book edition 2 Index Index........................................................................................................3 COMMON HISTORY AND FUTURE ..................................................5 I - GEOGRAPHICAL CONFIGURATION OF THE BALKANS.........8 II - ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISCOVERIES .........................................10 III - EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE PANNONIAN ONOMASTICS.......11 IV - DEVELOPMENT OF PALEOGRAPHY IN THE BALKANS....33 V – THRACE ........................................................................................37 VI – PREHISTORIC MACEDONIA....................................................41 VII - THESSALY - PREHISTORIC AEOLIA.....................................62 VIII – EPIRUS – PELASGIAN TESPROTIA......................................69
    [Show full text]
  • The Successors: Alexander's Legacy
    The Successors: Alexander’s Legacy November 20-22, 2015 Committee Background Guide The Successors: Alexander’s Legacy 1 Table of Contents Committee Director Welcome Letter ...........................................................................................2 Summons to the Babylon Council ................................................................................................3 The History of Macedon and Alexander ......................................................................................4 The Rise of Macedon and the Reign of Philip II ..........................................................................4 The Persian Empire ......................................................................................................................5 The Wars of Alexander ................................................................................................................5 Alexander’s Plans and Death .......................................................................................................7 Key Topics ......................................................................................................................................8 Succession of the Throne .............................................................................................................8 Partition of the Satrapies ............................................................................................................10 Continuity and Governance ........................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • The Deadly Styx River and the Death of Alexander
    Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics The Deadly Styx River and the Death of Alexander Version 1.3 May 2011 Adrienne Mayor Stanford University and Antoinette Hayes Pfizer Pharmaeuticals Abstract: Plutarch, Arrian, Diodorus, Justin, and other ancient historians report that rumors of poisoning arose after the death of Alexander in Babylon in 323 BC. Alexander’s close friends suspected a legendary poison gathered from the River Styx in Arcadia, so corrosive that only the hoof of a horse could contain it. It’s impossible to know the real cause of Alexander’s death, but a recent toxicological discovery may help explain why some ancient observers believed that Alexander was murdered with Styx poison. We propose that the river harbored a killer bacterium that can occur on limestone rock deposits. This paper elaborates on our Poster presentation, Toxicological History Room, XII International Congress of Toxicology, Barcelona, 19-23 July 2010, and Society of Toxicology Annual Meeting, Washington DC, March 2011. © Adrienne Mayor. [email protected] 2 THE DEADLY STYX RIVER and the DEATH OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT Adrienne Mayor and Antoinette Hayes According to several ancient historians, rumors of poisoning circulated after the death of Alexander, at age 32, in Babylon in 323 BC (Bosworth 1971 and 2010; Lane Fox 2004). Some close friends suspected a legendary poison gathered from the Styx waterfall near Nonacris in Arcadia (north central Peloponnese, Greece), a substance reputed to be so corrosive it could only be contained in the hoof of a horse. Many ancient and modern writers have speculated on the true cause of Alexander’s death, which remains an unsolved mystery.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Persian Civilization
    Ancient Persian Civilization Dr. Anousha Sedighi Associate Professor of Persian [email protected] Summer Institute: Global Education through film Middle East Studies Center Portland State University Students hear about Iran through media and in the political context → conflict with U.S. How much do we know about Iran? (people, places, events, etc.) How much do we know about Iran’s history? Why is it important to know about Iran’s history? It helps us put today’s conflicts into context: o 1953 CIA coup (overthrow of the first democratically elected Prime Minister: Mossadegh) o Hostage crisis (1979-1981) Today we learn about: Zoroastrianism (early monotheistic religion, roots in Judaism, Christianity, Islam) Cyrus the great (founder of Persian empire, first declaration of human rights) Foreign invasions of Persia (Alexander, Arab invasion, etc.) Prominent historical figures (Ferdowsi, Avicenna, Rumi, Razi, Khayyam, Mossadegh, Artemisia, etc.) Sounds interesting! Do we have educations films about them? Yes, in fact most of them are available online! Zoroaster Zoroaster: religious leader Eastern Iran, exact birth/time not certain Varies between 6000-1000 BC Promotes peace, goodness, love for nature Creator: Ahura-Mazda Three principles: Good thoughts Good words Good deeds Influenced Judaism, Christianity, Islam Ancient Iranian Peoples nd Middle of 2 melluniuem (Nomadic people) Aryan → Indo European tribe → Indo-Iranian Migrated to Iranian Plateau (from Eurasian plains) (Persians, Medes, Scythians, Bactrians, Parthians, Sarmatians,
    [Show full text]
  • Descarregar (3.403Mb)
    The Numismatic Chronicle 178 Offprint COIN HOARDS ANCIENT 1. A Small Hoard of Alexander Tetradrachms from Batman (Turkey) by DAVID MARTÍNEZ CHICO and ALBERTO GONZÁLEZ GARCÍA L O N D O N THE ROYAL NUMISMATIC SOCIETY 2 0 1 8 ANCIENT 285 COIN HOARDS 2018 ANCIENT HOARDS 1. A Small Hoard of Alexander Tetradrachms from Batman (Turkey) DAVID MARTÍNEZ CHICO and ALBERTO GONZÁLEZ GARCÍA 1 [PLATES 21-22] Introduction In January 2018 a Turkish collector informed us of a small hoard of 15 Alexander the Great tetradrachms (none in the name of Philip III), found by a farmer on the surface of private land on the outskirts of Batman in south-east Turkey, probably in 2017. No container was recorded; if there had been one, it must have been of perishable material, like a leather or cloth bag. The state of preservation of the pieces is good, although many show some wear. Some of the tetradrachms showed their original dark patina at the time when they were photographed and weighed. Some are half-cleaned, others completely cleaned, since the finder wanted to sell the coins quickly. We suggest below that the hoard could be related to the demobilized soldiers of Craterus and/or the First War of the Diadochi (321 BC). Alexander hoards from Anatolia of the late fourth century BC are of particular interest because of their scarcity and historical importance. Despite the difficulties in information retrieval, the Turkish collector said that the hoard was complete. We cannot of course guarantee this, and the group could perhaps be only a part of the total found.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and Reconciliation in Greek Cities (2010)
    Religion and Reconciliation in Greek Cities AMERICAN PHILOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION american classical studies volume 54 Series Editor Kathryn J. Gutzwiller Studies in Classical History and Society Meyer Reinhold Sextus Empiricus The Transmission and Recovery of Pyrrhonism Luciano Floridi The Augustan Succession An Historical Commentary on Cassius Dio’s Roman History Books 55 56 (9 B.C. A.D. 14) Peter Michael Swan Greek Mythography in the Roman World Alan Cameron Virgil Recomposed The Mythological and Secular Centos in Antiquity Scott McGill Representing Agrippina Constructions of Female Power in the Early Roman Empire Judith Ginsburg Figuring Genre in Roman Satire Catherine Keane Homer’s Cosmic Fabrication Choice and Design in the Iliad Bruce Heiden Hyperides Funeral Oration Judson Herrman Religion and Reconciliation in Greek Cities The Sacred Laws of Selinus and Cyrene Noel Robertson Religion and Reconciliation in Greek Cities The Sacred Laws of Selinus and Cyrene NOEL ROBERTSON 1 2010 3 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright q 2010 by the American Philological Association Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press.
    [Show full text]