arXiv:2006.08139v1 [math.CA] 15 Jun 2020 tde o ogtm ntefil fra n ope nlss o the C For by papers analysis. survey complex to and reader [13]. the real fun Liflyand refer of on we field boundedness operators, the the Hausdorff of in developments recent time and long background a for studied by pcs 2]frtebuddeso ouainadWee amalgam Wiener and on boun boundedness modulation the the on the for for boundedness 18] 7] 16, the [6, [5, see for can [22] one spaces, spaces, function on operator. 20] operators Hausdorff the [17, from Ces`aro operator derived fr be the also Riemann-Liouville and can the Hardy 5]), operator the and 4, instance, Hardy-Littlewood-P´olya operator For [1, The (see analysis. harmonic operator of Hardy field the in operators ikwk’ nqaiycno eapidt us-aahsae,the Hausdo spaces, of spaces. boundedness Quasi-Banach Banach the to considering results applied boundedness be few cannot inequality Minkowski’s a t pca tts since status, special its has ucinsaei h edo amncaayi.Tesuyof study The analysis. harmonic of field the in space function rtiiitdb ajn[2 n otne n[4.Vr eety Liflya recently, Very on [14]. results in boundedness continued multidimensional and the [12] establishes Kanjin [15] by initiated first onens euto oa ad space Hardy local t on refer result we boundedness operator, Hausdorff of type another of boundedness o utbefnto ,tecrepnigHudr operator Hausdorff corresponding the Φ, function suitable a For me summation classical some with connection in operator, Hausdorff e od n phrases. and words Key 2010 nrcn er,teei nicesn neeto h boundedne the on interest increasing an is there years, recent In contains operator Hausdorff suitably, taken is Φ when Particularly, mn h rvosrsls h td fHudr prtr on operators Hausdorff of study the results, previous the Among ae ntepeiu eut,a neetn rbe swehrwe whether is problem interesting an results, previous the on Based H NONENS FHUDRFOEAOSON OPERATORS HAUSDORFF OF UNBOUNDEDNESS THE ahmtc ujc Classification. Subject Mathematics ag aiyo us-aahsae,unless spaces, Quasi-Banach of family large a Abstract. ECA U,JAMA UN N UPN ZHAO GUOPING AND RUAN, JIANMIAO GUO, WEICHAO nti oe eso htteHudr operator Hausdorff the that show we note, this In asoffoeao,lclHrysae ouainsae unbou space, modulation space, Hardy local operator, Hausdorff 1. nrdcinadMotivation and Introduction US-AAHSPACES QUASI-BANACH H H Φ f p ( ( R x := ) n H saQaiBnc pc n loa important an also and space Quasi-Banach a is ) 1 rmr 23;Scnay47G10. Secondary 42B35; Primary Z and R h n p Φ( 1 ( R h y 1 n oee,sneteagmn fusing of argument the since However, . ) H ,o vno h eea inhomogeneous general the on even or ), f Φ sazr operator. zero a is | x y | dy. H H erae o[,19]. [2, to reader he Φ ffoeaoso Quasi- on operators rff e-a-ag[]and [3] hen-Fan-Wang to pcsregarding spaces ction p subuddon unbounded is ( ens nLebesgue on dedness H R H H n Φ noedimension. one in p .Frthe For ). f prtr adjoint operator, Φ ( a sals the establish can cinlintegral actional oeimportant some R so Hausdorff of ss hd,hsbeen has thods, on a edefined be can n eaeol a only are re (0 ) pcs and spaces, nd-Miyachi H historical p < p < ndedness. ( R H was ) (1.1) p ( R 1) ) 2 WEICHAOGUO,JIANMIAORUAN,ANDGUOPINGZHAO
p,q Rn frequency decomposition spaces such as Triebel-Lizorkin spaces Fs ( ), Besov spaces p,q Rn p,q Rn Bs ( ) and modulation spaces Ms ( ) with p ∈ (0, 1). In this paper, we will explore this problem and give an negative answer, showing that the Hausdorff operator is unboundedness on a large family of Quasi-Banach spaces. In particular, we prove p,q p,q p,q that all the nonzero Hausdorff operators are unbounded on Fs , Bs or Ms with p ∈ (0, 1). Our paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we collect some notations and basic properties of function spaces. The unboundedness results and their proofs will be presented in Section 3. Throughout this paper, we will adopt the following notations. We use X . Y to denote the statement that X ≤ CY , with a positive constant C that may depend on n, p, but it might be different from line to line. The notation X ∼ Y means the statement X . Y . X. We use X .λ Y to denote X ≤ CλY , meaning that the n implied constant Cλ depends on the parameter λ. For x = (x1, x2, ..., xn) ∈ R , we 2 1/2 denote |x|∞ := max |xi| and hxi := (1 + |x| ) . i=1,2,...,n
2. Preliminary Let S := S (Rn) be the Schwartz space and S ′ := S ′(Rn) be the space of tempered distributions. We define the Fourier transform F f and the inverse Fourier transform F −1f of f ∈ S (Rn) by
F f(ξ)= fˆ(ξ)= f(x)e−2πix·ξdx, F −1f(x)= fˇ(x)= f(ξ)e2πix·ξdξ. Rn Rn Z Z The local Hardy space was introduced by Goldberg [8]. Let 0
−j + φj(ξ)= φ(2 ξ), j ∈ Z , (2.2) φ0(ξ)=1 − φj(ξ)= ϕ(ξ). j∈Z+ P For integers j ≥ 0, we define the Littlewood-Paley operators −1 ∆j = F φjF . (2.3) THE UNBOUNDEDNESS OF HAUSDORFF OPERATORS ON QUASI-BANACH SPACES 3
Let 0 < p,q ≤∞, s ∈ R. For a tempered distribution f, we set the norm
∞ 1/q q p,q jsq kfkBs = 2 k∆jfkLp , (2.4) j=0 ! X p,q with the usual modifications when q = ∞. The (inhomogeneous) Besov space Bs is p,q the space of all tempered distributions f for which the quantity kfkBs is finite. Let 0 ∞ 1/q p,q jsq q kfkFs = 2 |∆jf| (2.5) ! j=0 p X L p,q with the usual modifications when q = ∞. The Triebel-Lizorkin space Fs is the space p,q of all tempered distributions f for which the quantity kfkFs is finite. We recall that the local Hardy space hp is equivalent with the inhomogeneous Triebel-Lizorkin space p,2 F0 for p ∈ (0, ∞) Next, we introduce the modulation space. Denote by Qk the unit cube with the n center at k. Then the family {Qk}k∈Zn constitutes a decomposition of R . Let η : n R → [0, 1] be a smooth function satisfying that η(ξ)=1 for |ξ|∞ ≤ 1/2 and η(ξ)=0 for |ξ|∞ ≥ 3/4. Let n ηk(ξ)= η(ξ − k),k ∈ Z be a translation of η. Since ηk(ξ) = 1 in Qk, we have that k∈Zn ηk(ξ) ≥ 1 for all ξ ∈ Rn. Denote −1 P n σk(ξ)= ηk(ξ) ηl(ξ) , k ∈ Z . Zn ! lX∈ It is easy to know that {σk}k∈Zn constitutes a smooth partition of the unity, and σk(ξ)= σ(ξ − k). The frequency-uniform decomposition operators can be defined by −1 k := F σkF Zn p,q for k ∈ . Now, we give the (discrete) definition of modulation space Ms . R p,q Definition 2.1. Let s ∈ , 0 < p,q ≤ ∞. The modulation space Ms consists of all f ∈ S ′ such that the (quasi-)norm 1/q q p,q sq kfkMs := hki kkfkLp Zn ! kX∈ is finite. Note that this definition is independent of the choice of {σk}k∈Zn . We also ∞ Rn S Rn p,q R recall a basic fact that Cc ( ) ⊂ ( ) ⊂ Ms for any s ∈ , 0 < p,q ≤∞. p Rn ∞ Rn We say X ֒→ L0( ), if for every ϕ ∈ Cc ( ) we have kϕ ∗ fkLp(Rn) ≤ CkfkX for all f ∈ X, where the constant C is only dependent on ϕ. Following, we collect some basic embedding results of function spaces. Lemma 2.2. Let 0 p p,p p,p p,p (1) For X = h , M , B , F , we have kgkLp . kgkX for all measurable functions g ∈ X. p,q F q,p p,q p,q p Rn .( )For Y = Ms , M , Bs , Fs , we have Y ֒→ L0 (2) p ∞ Proof. We first verify that kgkLp . kgkhp for measurable functions g ∈ h . Take a Cc function ψ with Rn ψ(x)dx = 1. We have n lim ψt ∗ g = g a.e. on R . R t→0 Thus, kgkLp = k lim ψt ∗ gkLp ≤k sup |ψt ∗ g|kLp = kgkhp , t→0 0 ∞ ∞ 1/p p kfkLp = ∆jf ≤ k∆jfkLp = kfkBp,p = kfkF p,p . j=0 Lp j=0 ! X X p,q Next, we turn to the proof of statement (2). First, we deal with the case Y = Ms . Using the triangle inequality, we have 1/p p kϕ ∗ fkLp = k(ϕ ∗ f) ≤ kk(ϕ ∗ f)kLp . p k∈Zn L k∈Zn ! X X Moreover, there exists a constant c such that = ◦ , then n k |l|≤cn k+l k P kk(ϕ ∗ f)kLp = k+lϕ ∗ kf . kk+lϕkLp kkfkLp . Lp |l|≤cn |l|≤cn X X The above two estimates then yield that p 1/p kϕ ∗ fkLp . kk+lϕkLp kkfkLp Zn kX∈ |lX|≤cn p 1/p s −s ≤ sup hki kkfkLp hki kk+lϕkLp Zn k∈ Zn kX∈ |lX|≤cn .kfk p,∞ kϕk p,p .kfk p,q , Ms M−s Ms p,q p,q p,∞ where we use the fact ϕ ∈ M−s and Ms ⊂ Ms . q,p p,∞ For Y = F M . By the conclusion for Y = M , we have kϕ ∗ fkLp . kfkM p,∞ . Note that F M q,p is equal to the Wiener amalgam space W p,q (see[11, pp.10]), and recall the embedding relations (see [10, Lemma 2.5]): F M q,p ⊂ F M ∞,p = W p,∞ ⊂ M p,∞. The conclusion follows by kϕ ∗ fkLp . kfkM p,∞ . kfkF M q,p . THE UNBOUNDEDNESS OF HAUSDORFF OPERATORS ON QUASI-BANACH SPACES 5 p,q p,q p,q For Y = Bs , there exists a constant δ(p, q) > 0 such that Bs ⊂ Ms−δ(p,q) (see [9, p,q Theorem 1.2]). This and the conclusion for Y = Ms−δ(p,q) imply that kϕ ∗ fkLp . kfk p,q . kfk p,q . Ms−δ(p,q) Bs p,q p,q p,q For Y = Fs , take a constant δ > 0, then Fs ⊂ Bs−δ (see [21, pp.47]). This and p,q the conclusion for Y = Bs−δ imply that kϕ ∗ fk p . kfk p,q . kfk p,q . L Bs−δ Fs 3. Main Theorems In this section, we give our main theorems and their proofs. Suppose X is a (Quasi- )Banach space with translation invariant: kTyfkX = kfkX , where Tyf(x) := f(x − y) is the translation of f. 1 Rn ∞ Rn Theorem 3.1. Let 0 HΦ is bounded on X ⇐⇒ HΦ =0. Proof. The “if” part is trivial. We only present the proof for the “only if” part. We first point out that HΦf is pointwise well-defined for any smooth function f x supported away from the origin. In fact, in this case we denote Ex := {y : f |y| =06 }. n Observe that for any fixed x ∈ R , Ex is a bounded measurable set away from the 1 Rn origin. Recalling that Φ ∈ Lloc( \{0}), then the following integral is convergent: x x HΦf(x)= Φ(y)f dy = Φ(y)f dy. Rn |y| |y| Z ZEx n Moreover, HΦf is a measurable function on R . Using the polar coordinates, we write x HΦf(x)= Φ(y)f dy Rn |y| Z ∞ ∞ = Φ(ry′)f(x/r)dσ(y′)rn−1dr =: φ(r)f(x/r)dr, Sn−1 Z0 Z Z0 where φ(r) := Φ(ry′)rn−1dσ(y′). Sn−1 Z 1 Rn 1 R+ It follows by Φ ∈ Lloc( \{0}) that φ ∈ Lloc( ). Since φ is a measurable function on (0, ∞), almost every point in (0, ∞) is a Lebesgue point. Hence, it suffices to verify that if there exists a Lebesgue point r0 > 0 such that φ(r0) =6 0, then HΦ is unbounded. Without loss of generality, we assume that r0 = 1 is a Lebesgue point of φ, satisfying φ(1) = 1. The proof for other cases is similar. 1−p Taking θ = 2 , we set −θj −θj Aj = [1 − 2 , 1+2 ]. 6 WEICHAOGUO,JIANMIAORUAN,ANDGUOPINGZHAO Take g to be a nonnegative smooth function supported on B(0, 2), satisfying g = 1on j B(0, 1). Denote by gj(x) := g(x − 2 e0) the translation of g, where e0 = (1, 0, 0, ··· , 0) be the unit vector on Rn. For sufficiently large j, we have (2j + 2)(1 − 2−θj)+1 < (2j − 2)(1 + 2−θj) − 1. Denote Ej := B(ae0, 1/2). R j −θj j −θj a∈ :(2 +2)(1−2 )+1[≤a≤(2 −2)(1+2 )−1 (1−θ)j We have |Ej| ∼ 2 . For x ∈ Ej, we have (2j + 2)(1 − 2−θj) ≤|x| ≤ (2j − 2)(1 + 2−θj), |x| ∼ 2j. This implies that |x| |x| ≤ 1+2−θj, ≥ 1 − 2−θj. (3.1) 2j − 2 2j +2 Recall suppg ⊂ B(0, 2). For every x ∈ Ej, set x x E0 := {r : g =06 }, E1 := {r : g =1}. j,x j r j,x j r By a direct calculation and (3.1), we deduce that for x ∈ E j, |x| |x| E1 ⊂ E0 ⊂ , ⊂ A . (3.2) j,x j,x 2j +2 2j − 2 j j 0 Since |x| ∼ 2 for x ∈ Ej, we have the upper estimate of |Ej,x|: |x| |x| |E0 | ≤ − ∼ 2−j. j,x 2j − 2 2j +2 1 Next, we turn to the lower estimate of |Ej,x|. For x ∈ Ej, write x = ae0 + y for y ∈ B(0, 1/2), we have x ae + y r ∈ E1 ⇐= − 2je ≤ 1 ⇐⇒ 0 − 2je ≤ 1 j,x r 0 r 0 ae y ⇐= 0 − 2je + ≤ 1 r 0 r a 1 2 ⇐= − 2j ≤ , (if r ≥ ) r 4 3 a a ⇐⇒ r ∈ , . 2j +1/4 2j − 1/4 Observe that a a lim = lim =1 j→∞ 2j +1/4 j→∞ 2j − 1/4 for a ∈ [(2j +2)(1 − 2−θj)+1, (2j − 2)(1+2−θj ) − 1]. For sufficiently large j, we deduce a a that 2j +1/4 , 2j −1/4 ⊂ [2/3, ∞). Hence, h i a a , ⊂ E1 . 2j +1/4 2j − 1/4 j,x THE UNBOUNDEDNESS OF HAUSDORFF OPERATORS ON QUASI-BANACH SPACES 7 1 The lower estimate of |Ej,x| follows by a a |E1 | ≥ − ∼ 2−j. j,x 2j − 1/4 2j +1/4 1 0 The combination of lower estimate of |Ej,x| and upper estimate of |Ej,x| yields that −j 1 0 −j 1 0 −j 2 . |Ej,x|≤|Ej,x| . 2 , or equivalent: |Ej,x|∼|Ej,x| ∼ 2 . Next, we divide the Hausdorff operator into main term and error term by ∞ ∞ ∞ HΦgj(x)= φ(r)gj(x/r)dr = φ(1)gj(x/r)dr + (φ(r) − φ(1))gj(x/r)dr 0 0 0 Z M E Z Z =: HΦ gj(x)+ HΦ gj(x). Let us first turn to the estimate of main term. For x ∈ Ej, we have ∞ M 1 −j HΦ gj(x)= gj(x/r)dr ≥ gj(x/r)dr = |Ej,x| ∼ 2 . 1 Z0 ZEj,x (1−θ)j 1−p Recalling |Ej| ∼ 2 and θ = 2 , we have following estimate of the main term: − M p −jp −jp (1−θ)j (1 p)j kH g k p &2 |E | ∼ 2 2 =2 2 . (3.3) Φ j L (Ej ) j On the other hand, E p E p 1−p kH g k p ≤kH g k 1 |E | Φ j L (Ej ) Φ j L (Ej ) j p ∞ 1−p ≤ |φ(r) − φ(1)|gj(x/r)drdx |Ej| (3.4) ZEj Z0 ! p 1−p = |φ(r) − φ(1)|gj(x/r)drdx |Ej| . 0 ZEj ZEj,x ! Note that 0 Rn {(x, r): x ∈ Ej,r ∈ Ej,x}⊂{(x, r): r ∈ Aj, x ∈ }. We deduce that |φ(r) − φ(1)|gj(x/r)drdx 0 ZEj ZEj,x ≤ |φ(r) − φ(1)| gj(x/r)dxdr Rn ZAj Z n −θj =kgkL1 |φ(r) − φ(1)|r dr . |φ(r) − φ(1)|dr = ǫj|Aj| . ǫj2 , ZAj ZAj + where ǫj → 0 as j →∞. Combining this with (3.4), we have − p p p p (1 p)j E −θpj 1−p −θpj (1−θ)(1−p)j 2 kH g k p . ǫ 2 |E | . ǫ 2 2 = ǫ 2 . (3.5) Φ j L (Ej ) j j j j By (3.3) and (3.5), there exist two constants C1 and C2 such that − − p (1 p)j p p (1 p)j M 2 E 2 kH g k p ≥ C 2 , kH g k p ≤ C ǫ 2 . Φ j L (Ej ) 1 Φ j L (Ej ) 2 j 8 WEICHAOGUO,JIANMIAORUAN,ANDGUOPINGZHAO p For sufficiently large j such that C2ǫj ≤ C1/2, we have p p kH g k p ≥kH g k p Φ j L Φ j L (Ej ) M p E p ≥kH g k p −kH g k p Φ j L (Ej ) Φ j L (Ej ) − − − (1 p)j p (1 p)j (1 p)j 2 2 2 ≥C12 − C2ǫj 2 ≥ (C1/2)2 . However, the boundedness of HΦ yields that p p p p kHΦgjkLp . kHΦgjkX . kgjkX = kgkX, which leads to a contradiction. Recall that all the spaces Lp, hp, M p,p, Bp,p, F p,p are translation invariant. The fol- lowing corollary is a direct conclusion of Lemma 2.2 and Theorem 3.1. 1 Rn Corollary 3.2. Let 0 HΦ is bounded on X ⇐⇒ HΦ =0, where X = Lp, hp, M p,p, Bp,p, F p,p. p,q p,q p,q For more general frequency decomposition spaces such as X = Bs , Fs or Ms , the embedding condition kgkLp . kgkX is no longer valid. We establish following theorem with the help of the modified embedding (see Lemma 2.2). 1 Rn ∞ Rn →֒ Theorem 3.3. Let 0 kϕ ∗ HΦgjkLp(Rn) . kHΦgjkX . kgjkX = kgkX . Set Ξj = {x : B(x, 2) ⊂ Ej}. We have (1−θ)j |Ξj|∼|Ej| ∼ 2 (j →∞). M Rn M −j Recall that HΦ gj(x) ≥ 0 for x ∈ and HΦ gj(x) & 2 for x ∈ Ej. For x ∈ Ξj we have M M ϕ ∗ HΦ gj(x)= ϕ(x − z)HΦ gj(z)dz Rn Z M −j −j ≥ HΦ gj(z)dz & 2 dz ∼ 2 . ZB(x,1) ZB(x,1) (1−θ)j From this and the fact |Ξj| ∼ 2 , we deduce that − p (1 p)j M −jp −jp (1−θ)j 2 kϕ ∗ H g k p &2 |Ξ | & 2 2 =2 . Φ j L (Ξj ) j THE UNBOUNDEDNESS OF HAUSDORFF OPERATORS ON QUASI-BANACH SPACES 9 0 On the other hand, observing that Ej,z ⊂ Aj for z ∈ B(x, 2) with x ∈ Ξj, E p E p 1−p kϕ ∗ H g k p ≤kϕ ∗ H g k 1 |Ξ | Φ j L (Ξj ) Φ j L (Ξj ) j p ∞ 1−p ≤ ϕ(x − z) |φ(r) − φ(1)|gj(z/r)drdzdx |Ξj| ZΞj ZB(x,2) Z0 ! p 1−p = ϕ(x − z) |φ(r) − φ(1)|gj(z/r)drdzdx |Ξj| 0 ZΞj ZB(x,2) ZEj,z ! p 1−p ≤ |φ(r) − φ(1)| gj(z/r) ϕ(x − z)dxdzdr |Ξj| Rn Rn ZAj Z Z ! p − p p (1 p)j 1−p p 1−p 2 . |φ(r) − φ(1)|dr |Ξj| ∼ ǫj |Aj| |Ξj| ∼ ǫj 2 , ZAj ! + where ǫj → 0 as j → ∞. Now, we have finished the estimates of main term kϕ ∗ M p E p H g k p and error term kϕ ∗ H g k p , the remainder of this proof is the same Φ j L (Ξj ) Φ j L (Ξj ) as that of Theorem 3.1. Using Theorem 3.3 and Lemma 2.2, we have following corollary. R 1 Rn Corollary 3.4. Let 0 < q ≤∞,s ∈ , Φ ∈ Lloc( \{0}). If 0 HΦ is bounded on X ⇐⇒ HΦ =0, p,q p,q p,q where X = Fs , Bs or Ms . In particular, due to the time-frequency symmetry of modulation space, we have following corollary. Corollary 3.5. Let 0 < p,q ≤∞. Let Φ be a measurable function satisfying |y|nΦ(y)dy < ∞, Φ(y)dy < ∞. c ZB(0,1) ZB(0,1) If 0 HΦf = HΦf, where d f bn HΦf(x)= Φ(y)|y| f(|y|x)dy. Rn Z Thus, f kHΦfkM p,q = kHΦfkF M p,q = kHΦfkF M p,q . d f b 10 WEICHAOGUO,JIANMIAORUAN,ANDGUOPINGZHAO If HΦ is bounded on Mp,q, we have ˇ ˇ kHΦfkF M p,q = kHΦfkM p,q . kfkM p,q = kfkF M p,q . Write f n HΦf(x)= Φ(y)|y| f(|y|x)dy Rn Z ∞ f = Φ(ry′)rnf(rx)dσ(y′)rn−1dr 0 Sn−1 Z ∞ Z ∞ = Φ(y′/r)r−1−2nf(x/r)dσ(y′)dr =: φ(r)f(x/r)dr, Sn−1 Z0 Z Z0 where e φ(r)= Φ(y′/r)r−1−2ndσ(y′). Sn−1 Z 1 R+ F p,q q Rn Observe φ ∈ Lloc( ) ande recall M ֒→ L0( ) with q ∈ (0, 1). By the same argument as in the proofs of Theorem 3.1 and 3.3, we conclude that φ = 0 and complete this proof.e e Acknowledgements. This work was partially supported by the National Natural Foundation of China (Nos. 11701112, 11771388, 11771358, 11671414, 11601456), Zhe- jiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. LY18A010015) and Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (Nos. 2017J01723, 2018J01430). References [1] J. Chen, D. Fan, and J. Li. Hausdorff operators on function spaces. Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. B, 33(4):537–556, 2012. [2] J. Chen, D. Fan, X. Lin, and J. Ruan. The fractional Hausdorff operators on the Hardy spaces Hp(Rn). Anal. Math., 42(1):1–17, 2016. [3] J. Chen, D. Fan, and S. Wang. Hausdorff operators on Euclidean spaces. Appl. Math. J. Chinese Univ. Ser. B, 28(4):548–564, 2013. [4] J. C. Chen, D. S. Fan, and C. J. Zhang. Multilinear Hausdorff operators and their best constants. Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.), 28(8):1521–1530, 2012. [5] D. Fan and X. Lin. Hausdorff operator on real Hardy spaces. Analysis (Berlin), 34(4):319–337, 2014. [6] G. Gao, X. Wu, and W. Guo. Some results for Hausdorff operators. Math. Inequal. Appl., 18(1):155–168, 2015. [7] G. Gao and Y. Zhong. Some inequalities for Hausdorff operators. Math. Inequal. Appl., 17(3):1061–1078, 2014. [8] D. Goldberg. A local version of real Hardy spaces. Duke Math. J., 46(1):27–42, 1979. [9] W. Guo, D. Fan, and G. Zhao. Full characterization of the embedding relations between α- modulation spaces. Sci. China Math., 61(7):1243–1272, 2018. [10] W. Guo, H. Wu, Q. Yang, and G. Zhao. Characterization of inclusion relations between Wiener amalgam and some classical spaces. J. Funct. Anal., 273(1):404–443, 2017. [11] W. Guo and G. Zhao. Sharp estimates of unimodular Fourier multipliers on Wiener amalgam spaces. J. Funct. Anal., 278(6):108405, 44, 2020. [12] Y. Kanjin. The Hausdorff operators on the real Hardy spaces Hp(R). Studia Math., 148(1):37–45, 2001. THE UNBOUNDEDNESS OF HAUSDORFF OPERATORS ON QUASI-BANACH SPACES 11 [13] E. Liflyand. Complex and real Hausdorff operators. CRM, preprint 1046, 2011, 45p. Or http://www. crm.es/Publications/11/Pr1046.pdf. [14] E. Liflyand and A. Miyachi. Boundedness of the Hausdorff operators in Hp spaces, 0 School of Science, Jimei University, Xiamen, 361021, P.R.China E-mail address: [email protected] Department of Mathematics, Zhejiang International Studies University, Hangzhou 310012, P. R. China E-mail address: [email protected] School of Applied Mathematics, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, 361024, P.R.China E-mail address: [email protected]