HASAN-DISSERTATION-2019.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HASAN-DISSERTATION-2019.Pdf EVALUATION OF MODEL UNCERTAINTIES IN LRFD CALIBRATION PROCESS OF DRILLED SHAFT AXIAL DESIGN by Mohammad Rakib Hasan Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON August 2019 Copyright © by Mohammad Rakib Hasan 2019 All Rights Reserved i This dissertation is dedicated to my parents for their constant support and motivation throughout my life. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS At first, I would like to express my deepest gratitude and acknowledgement to my advisor Dr. Xinbao Yu for his endless guidance and encouragement during my doctoral research. I am thankful to him for providing me the opportunity of working under his supervision. This research would not come to fruition without his counseling. I also would like to thank my committee members Dr. Shahadat Hossain, Dr. Laureno Hoyos and Dr. Samantha Sabatino for their valuable comments, help and time. I am thankful to Dr. Xinbao Yu, Dr. Laureano Hoyos, Dr. Sahadat Hossain, Dr. Aera LeBoulluec, Dr. Dong-Jun Seo and Dr. Chein-Pai Han for fulfilling my experience at University of Texas at Arlington by sharing their knowledge during my course works required for the doctoral program. Finally, I would like to thank my parents, my siblings and my beloved wife for their endless love and encouragement which kept me motivated. None of these would happen without them. July 29, 2019 iii ABSTRACT OPTIMIZATION OF LRFD CALIBRATION OF DRILLED SHAFTS by Mohammad Rakib Hasan The University of Texas at Arlington, 2019 Supervising Professor: Xinbao Yu The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) released a policy in 2000 that required all new federally funded bridges to be designed using the AASHTO LRFD specifications by October 2007. The transition from ASD to LRFD posed a challenge due to the lack of area specific resistance factors. Though several studies were performed to calibrate area specific resistance factors, they did not improve from the resistance factors suggested in AASHTO 2012. The objective of this study is to analyze the uncertainties in LRFD calibration and to calibrate more accurate and improved resistance factors. A drilled shaft load test database from Mississippi and Louisiana has been selected to carry on the research. Osterberg Cell load test was a majority among the load tests in the database. Extrapolation is required in most Osterberg cell load test which may cause errors in the calibration. An analysis of the error due to the extrapolation can result in more accurate LRFD calibration of resistance factors. The analysis was performed on 8 drilled shaft cases from Louisiana and Mississippi. 4 of the 8 drilled shafts reached 5% of the shaft diameter (D) failure criterion and 4 of the drilled shafts were close to 5%D. For each of the cases, extrapolation was performed on tip and side resistance curves to get the equivalent top-down curve. iv Data points were removed systematically from the end of top and bottom movement curves and extrapolation was performed for each trial to get an equivalent top-down curve. Bias and error values was measured for each of the trial top down scurves for both 5% of the drilled shaft diameter (D). 80 extrapolation cases were achieved from this analysis. Finally, multiple linear regression analysis was performed on the extrapolated data set in order to reduce the effect of the extrapolation error on the resistance factor. Applying bounded bias distribution may also result in more accurate resistance factors, since the bias values have significant role in the calibration process. As the probability of failure significantly depends on the lower tail of the distribution of the resistance values and there is a physical presence of a lower limit of the resistance of a drilled shaft, introducing a lower bound to the resistance distribution will ensure more realistic calibration of the resistance factors. An analysis by simulation of load tests to failure on will also help to understand the reasons for low resistance factor values. The objective of this study is also to minimize effect of extrapolation by means of finite element modelling of the bidirectional load tests included in a database collected from Louisiana and Mississippi. The finite element modelling was performed in PLAXIS 2D until the top and the bottom movement curves reach the measured loads corresponding to the failure criteria. LRFD calibration of resistance factors was performed based on the simulated bidirectional load test database and the results were compared to the results from conventional approach. v Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... iii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS .......................................................................................................... x LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... xiv Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1. General ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2. Problem Statement .......................................................................................................... 6 1.3. Objective ......................................................................................................................... 7 1.4. Organization of the Dissertation ..................................................................................... 7 Chapter 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................... 9 2.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.2. Drilled Shaft Design Practice ....................................................................................... 10 2.2.1. Side and Tip Resistance in Cohesive Soil................................................................. 12 2.2.2. Side and Tip Resistance in Cohesionless or Granular Soil ....................................... 15 2.2.3. Side and Tip Resistance in Intermediate Geomaterial .............................................. 17 2.2.4. Side and Tip Resistance in Rock .............................................................................. 20 2.2.5. Nominal Axial Resistance ......................................................................................... 25 2.2.6. Settlement of Drilled Shafts ...................................................................................... 26 2.3. Load Tests on Drilled Shafts ........................................................................................ 29 vi 1.1.1. Static Load Test ........................................................................................................ 30 1.1.2. Bidirectional Load Test............................................................................................. 33 2.4. LRFD Calibration of Resistance Factors ...................................................................... 45 2.4.1. Load and Resistance Factor Design .......................................................................... 45 2.4.2. Resistance Factor Development ................................................................................ 47 3.5. Studies on Calibration of Resistance Factor ................................................................. 53 3.5.1. Florida DOT .............................................................................................................. 53 3.5.2. Iowa DOT ................................................................................................................. 59 3.5.3. New Mexico DOT..................................................................................................... 65 3.5.4. Louisiana DOTD ....................................................................................................... 72 2.5.5. Nevada DOT ............................................................................................................. 78 2.5.6. FHWA Recommendations ........................................................................................ 84 2.6. Studies on Uncertainties in LRFD Calibration ............................................................. 86 2.6.1. Studies on Extrapolation ........................................................................................... 88 2.6.2. Studies on Outliers .................................................................................................... 98 2.7. Summary ..................................................................................................................... 100 Chapter 3 DATABASE............................................................................................................... 102 3.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 102 3.2. Background ................................................................................................................. 102 3.3. Breakdown of the Database .......................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Application of Geodetic Measuring Methods for Reliable Evaluation of Static Load Test Results of Foundation Piles
    remote sensing Article Application of Geodetic Measuring Methods for Reliable Evaluation of Static Load Test Results of Foundation Piles Zbigniew Muszy ´nski 1,* and Jarosław Rybak 2 1 Faculty of Geoengineering, Mining and Geology, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland 2 Faculty of Civil Engineering, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Geodetic measuring methods are widely used in the course of various geotechnical works. The main purpose is usually related to the location in space, geometrical dimensions, settlements, deflections, and other forms of displacements and their consequences. This study focuses on the application of selected surveying methods in static load tests (SLTs) of foundation piles. Basic aspects of the SLT are presented in the introductory section, together with the explanation of the authors’ motivation behind the novel (but already sufficiently tested) application of remote methods introduced to confirm, through inverse analysis, the load applied to the pile head under testing at every stage of its loading. Materials and methods are described in the second section in order to provide basic information on the test site and principles of the SLT method applied. The case study shows the methodology of displacement control in the particular test, which is described in light of a Citation: Muszy´nski,Z.; Rybak, J. presented review of geodetic techniques for displacement control, especially terrestrial laser scanning Application of Geodetic Measuring and robotic tacheometry. The geotechnical testing procedure, which is of secondary importance for Methods for Reliable Evaluation of the current study, is also introduced in order to emphasize the versatility of the proposed method.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from the Online Library of the International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE)
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SOIL MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING This paper was downloaded from the Online Library of the International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE). The library is available here: https://www.issmge.org/publications/online-library This is an open-access database that archives thousands of papers published under the Auspices of the ISSMGE and maintained by the Innovation and Development Committee of ISSMGE. Section 3B Fondations sur pieux Piled Foundations Sujets de discussion : Détermination de la force portante d’une fondation à partir des indications des pénétromètres. Influence du groupement des pieux sur la force portante et le tassement. Subjects for discussion : Determination of the bearing capacity of a foundation from penetrometer tests. Pile groups; bearing capacity and settlement. Président / Chairman : E. Schultze, Allemagne. Vice-Président / Vice-Chairman : H. C ourbot, France. Rapporteur Général / General Reporter : L. Z eevaert, Mexique. Membres du Groupe de discussion / Members o f the Panel : E. G euze, U.S.A.; J. K erisel, France; T. M ogami, Japon; N- N ajdanovic, Yougoslavie ; R.B. Peck, U.S.A.; M. V argas, Brésil. Discussion orale / Oral Discussion V. Berezantsev, U.R.S.S. R. B. Peck, U.S.A. L. Bjerrum, Norvège H. Petermann, Allemagne A. J. L. Bolognesi, Argentine R. Pietkowski, Pologne A. Casagrande, U.S.A. H. Simons, Allemagne T. K. Chaplin, Grande-Bretagne G. F. Sowers, U.S.A. A. J. Da Costa Nunes, Brésil C. Szechy, Hongrie E. de Beer, Belgique C. Van der Veen, Hollande C. Djanoeff, Grande-Bretagne M. Vargas, Brésil O. Eide, Norvège E.
    [Show full text]
  • Finite Element Study on Static Pile Load Testing Li Yi A
    FINITE ELEMENT STUDY ON STATIC PILE LOAD TESTING LI YI (B.Eng) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2004 Dedicated to my family and friends ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to express his sincere gratitude and appreciation to his supervisor, Associate Professor Harry Tan Siew Ann, for his continual encouragement and bountiful support that have made my postgraduate study an educational and fruitful experience. In addition, the author would also like to thank Mr. Thomas Molnit (Project Manager, LOADTEST Asia Pte. Ltd.), Mr. Tian Hai (Former NUS postgraduate, KTP Consultants Pte. Ltd.), for their assistance in providing the necessary technical and academic documents during this project. Finally, the author is grateful to all my friends and colleagues for their help and friendship. Special thanks are extended to Ms. Zhou Yun. Her spiritual support made my thesis’ journey an enjoyable one. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................ii SUMMARY................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES......................................................................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................vii
    [Show full text]
  • Rectification of Tilt & Shift of a Well by Kentledge Method
    International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 9, Issue 2, February-2018 1447 ISSN 2229-5518 Rectification of Tilt & Shift of a Well by Kentledge Method ROHIT KUMAR DUBEY Well foundations are quite appropriate foundation for Abstract: quite useful. In principle the construction of a well alluvial soils in rivers and creeks where max depth of scour can be quite large. In india technology of well foundation for design and foundation for bridges is similar to the conventional construction is quite well developed, still there are situations where serious problems are encountered at site during construction of wells whose main purpose was to obtain ground water well foundations, which results in excessive tilt of well in a centuries ago. In planthe shape of a well foundation is particular direction. In the case of excessive tilt, regular method for tilt rectification like eccentric grabbing, water jetting, strutting the similar to the caisson. When the circular well becomes well etc. might be not so effective as required. Excessive tilt occurred during sinking of well in undergoing construction of a uneconomical to support the pier of substructure, the cable stayed bridge over river ganga have been identified & well foundation can take other shapes also like double- explained by the author in this presentation. Rohit Kumar Dubey is currently persuing master degree D, rectangular, octagonal etc. programme in civil engineering in Dr. A. P. J.Abdul Kalam Technical University, Uttar Pradesh, India. Ph. No. +91- 7549326005, email id:- [email protected] Compared to the group of piles, well foundation are rigid in engineering behavior and are able to resist large Keyword: Well Foundation, Tilt & Shift, Kentledge Method, Sinking forces of floating trees or bolders that may roll on the river bed.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancement of Shaft Capacity of Cast-In- Place Piles Using a Hook System
    Enhancement of Shaft Capacity of Cast-in- Place Piles using a Hook System by Ghazi Abou El Hosn A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Applied Science in Civil Engineering Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario ©2015 Ghazi Abou El Hosn * Abstract This research investigates an innovative approach to improve the shaft bearing capacity of cast- in-place pile foundations by utilizing passive inclusions (Hooks) that will be mobilized if movement occurs in pile system. An extensive experimental program was developed to study the shaft bearing capacity of cast-in-place piles with and without hook system in soft clay and sand. First phase of the experiment was developed to investigate the effect of passive inclusion on pile- soil interface shear strength behaviour, employing a modified direct shear test apparatus. The interface strength obtained for pile-soil specimens was found to significantly increase when passive inclusions were implemented. Apparent residual friction angle for concrete-sand interface increased from 22 to 29.5 when two hook elements were used at the pile-soil interface. The pile-clay apparent adhesion was also increased from 19 kPa to 34 kPa. A series of pile-load testing at field were performed on cast-in-place in soft clay to investigate the effect of passive inclusions on pile bearing capacity. The pile-load tests were conducted at Gloucester test site. Four model piles were cast with steel cages along with hooks (P1- no hook, P2-7 hooks, P3- 5 hooks and P4- 5 hooks) installed on the exterior side of the steel cages prior to filling the hole with concrete.
    [Show full text]
  • View Souvenir Book
    DFI INDIA 2018 Souvenir With extended abstracts Sponsor / Exhibitor catalogue www.dfi -india.org Deep Foundations Institute USA, DFI of India Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India Indian Geotechnical Society, Ahmedabad Chapter, Ahmedabad, India 8th Annual Conference on Deep Foundation Technologies for Infrastructure Development in India IIT Gandhinagar, India, 15-17 November 2018 1 Deep Foundations Institute of India Advanced foundation technologies Good contracting and work practices Skill development Design, construction, and safety manuals Professionalism in Geotechnical Investigation Student outreach Women in deep foundation industry Join the DFI Family DFI India 2018 8th Annual Conference on Deep Foundation Technologies for Infrastructure Development in India IIT Gandhinagar, India, 15-17 November 2018 Souvenir With extended abstracts Sponsor / Exhibitor catalogue Deep Foundations Institute, DFI of India Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India Indian Geotechnical Society, Ahmedabad Chapter, Ahmedabad, India www.dfi -india.org 3 Deep Foundation Technologies for Infrastucture Development in India - DFI India 2018 IIT Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India, 15-17 November 2018 DFI India 2018, 8th Annual Conference on Deep Foundation Technologies for Infrastructure Development in India Advisory Committee Prof. Sudhir K. Jain, Director. IIT Gandhinagar Dr. Dan Brown, Dan Brown and Association and DFI President Mr. John R. Wolosick, Hayward Baker and DFI Past President Prof. G. L. Sivakumar Babu, IGS President Er. Arvind Shrivastava, Nuclear Power Corp of India and EC Member, DFI of India Prof. A. Boominathan, IIT Madras and EC Member, DFI of India Prof. S. R. Gandhi, NIT Surat and EC Member, DFI of India Gianfranco Di Cicco, GD Consulting LLC and DFI Trustee Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Pile Foundation Design: a Student Guide
    Pile Foundation Design: A Student Guide Ascalew Abebe & Dr Ian GN Smith School of the Built Environment, Napier University, Edinburgh (Note: This Student Guide is intended as just that - a guide for students of civil engineering. Use it as you see fit, but please note that there is no technical support available to answer any questions about the guide!) PURPOSE OF THE GUIDE There are many texts on pile foundations. Generally, experience shows us that undergraduates find most of these texts complicated and difficult to understand. This guide has extracted the main points and puts together the whole process of pile foundation design in a student friendly manner. The guide is presented in two versions: text-version (compendium from) and this web-version that can be accessed via internet or intranet and can be used as a supplementary self-assisting students guide. STRUCTURE OF THE GUIDE Introduction to pile foundations Pile foundation design Load on piles Single pile design Pile group design Installation-test-and factor of safety Pile installation methods Test piles Factors of safety Chapter 1 Introduction to pile foundations 1.1 Pile foundations 1.2 Historical 1.3 Function of piles 1.4 Classification of piles 1.4.1 Classification of pile with respect to load transmission and functional behaviour 1.4.2 End bearing piles 1.4.3 Friction or cohesion piles 1.4.4 Cohesion piles 1.4.5 Friction piles 1.4.6 Combination of friction piles and cohesion piles 1.4.7 .Classification of pile with respect to type of material 1.4.8 Timber piles 1.4.9 Concrete
    [Show full text]
  • Pile Load Test and Glostrext Instrumentation
    Glostrext Technology Group of Companies .since 1992. Glostrext Instrumentation Method : A novel technology empowering You to make decisions based on Facts Welcome to Glostrext Technology Group of Companies We offer trusted measurements, large quantity wireless-sensors-based reliable automated data, specialist testing, monitoring works and creative automation solutions in various engineering industries. Our Services and Solutions: Pile Load Test and Bi-Directional Static Geotechnical Glostrext Load Testing Instrumentation Instrumentation (BDSLT) and Engineering Survey Wireless Sensors Automation and Accredited and Online IoT Solutions Calibration Structural Health Services Monitoring Glostrext Technology HQ @ Subang 2, Damansara West Vision Objective Core Values To obtain the hallmark for trusted To provide innovative technologies and Trustworthiness on data provided specialist builders, technical excellence, trusted data empowering our clients to Respect team work spirit innovative services and creative solutions. make decision based on facts. Fairness via facts based decisions Caring via structured sharing & training Glostrext Technology Sdn. Bhd. (649873-V) Glostrext Technology (S) Pte Ltd (200905332R) Spectest Sdn. Bhd. (236932-K) 30 Kaki Bukit Road 3, #01-02 & #06-09 Empire Techno No. 11A, Jalan Apollo U5/194, Seksyen U5, Bandar Centre, Singapore 417819. Pinggiran Subang, 40150 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. +65-6846 9808, +65-8299 5577 +603-7832 2012 +603-7832 3646 +65-6846 9800 [email protected], [email protected] [email protected] Page 1-8 Glostrext 2020 Rev. 1.0 Glostrext Technology Group of Companies .since 1992. Glostrext Instrumentation Method : A novel technology empowering You to make decisions based on Facts Pile Load Test and Glostrext Instrumentation We provide a complete range of high-quality pile tests instrumentation services since 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Study of T-Z Curve Generated from Kentledge System and Bidirectional Test by N U Rachmayanti
    Development Study Of T-Z Curve Generated From Kentledge System And Bidirectional Test By N U rachmayanti WORD COUNT 3959 TIME SUBMITTED 12-JAN-2021 02:17PM PAPER ID 67783827 Development Study Of T-Z Curve Generated From Kentledge System And Bidirectional Test ORIGINALITY REPORT 20% SIMILARITY INDEX PRIMARY SOURCES 1 Amy Wadu, A A Tuati, M R Sodanango. "Strategy To 333 words — % Reduce Traffic Jams On Piet A. Tallo Street, Kupang 6 City", UKaRsT, 2020 Crossref 2 ojs.unik-kediri.ac.id Internet 93 words — 2% 3 jp.ic-on-line.cn Internet 58 words — 1% 4 pt.scribd.com Internet 46 words — 1% 5 docplayer.net Internet 40 words — 1% 6 Anita Widianti, Willis Diana, Maratul Hasana. "Direct 40 words — % Shear Strength of Clay Reinforced with Coir Fiber", 1 UKaRsT, 2020 Crossref 7 Sung-Ryul Kim, Sung-Gyo Chung. "Equivalent head- down load vs. Movement relationships evaluated from 38 words — 1% bi-directional pile load tests", KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2012 Crossref 8 docslide.net Internet 38 words — 1% 9 idoc.pub Internet 37 words — 1% 10 Kazem Fakharian, Nasrin Vafaei. "Effect of Density on 34 words — % Skin Friction Response of Piles Embedded in Sand by 1 Simple Shear Interface Tests", Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2020 Crossref 11 journal.um-surabaya.ac.id Internet 30 words — 1% 12 H. Moayedi, R. Nazir, S. Ghareh, A. 27 words — % Sobhanmanesh, Yean-Chin Tan. "Performance < 1 Analysis of a Piled Raft Foundation System of Varying Pile Lengths in Controlling Angular Distortion", Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 2018 Crossref 13 Yunlong Liu, Sai K.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Licence Application
    T: +44 (0)1224 295579 E: [email protected] Marine Licence Application for Construction Projects Version 1.0 Marine (Scotland) Act 2010 Marine Scotland, 375 Victoria Road, Aberdeen, AB11 9DB http://www.gov.scot/Topics/marine/Licensing/marine Acronyms Please note the following acronyms referred to in this application form: BPEO Best Practicable Environmental Option EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ES Environmental Statement MHWS Mean High Water Springs MMO Marine Mammal Observer MPA Marine Protected Area MS-LOT Marine Scotland – Licensing Operations Team PAM Passive Acoustic Monitoring SAC Special Area of Conservation SNH Scottish Natural Heritage SPA Special Protection Area SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest WGS84 World Geodetic System 1984 Explanatory Notes The following numbered paragraphs correspond to the questions on the application form and are intended to assist in completing the form. These explanatory notes are specific to this application and so you are advised to read these in conjunction with the Marine Scotland Guidance for Marine Licence Applicants document. 1. Applicant Details The person making the application who will be named as the licensee. 2. Agent Details Any person acting under contract (or other agreement) on behalf of any party listed as the applicant and having responsibility for the control, management or physical deposit or removal of any substance(s) or object(s). 3. Payment Indicate payment method. Cheques must be made payable to: The Scottish Government. Marine licence applications will not be accepted unless accompanied by a cheque for the correct application fee, or if an invoice is requested, until that invoice is settled. Target timelines for determining applications do not begin until the application fee is paid.
    [Show full text]
  • 395 Common-Mistakes in Static Loading-Test Procedures and Result
    1910 Fellenius, B.H. and Nguyen, B.N., 2019. Common mistakes in static loading-test procedures and result analyses. Geotechnical Engineering Journal of the SEAGS & AGSSEA, September 2019, 50(3) 20-31. Geotechnical Engineering Journal of the SEAGS & AGSSEA Vol. 50 No. 3 September 2019 ISSN 0046-5828 Common Mistakes in Static Loading-test Procedures and Result Analyses Bengt H. Fellenius1 and Ba N. Nguyen2 1Consulting Engineer, Sidney, BC, Canada, V8L 2B9 2TW-Asia Consultants Co., Ltd., Hanoi office, Hanoi, Vietnam 1E-mail: [email protected] 2E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Static loading tests on piles are arranged in many different ways ranging from quick tests to slow test, from constant-rate-of- penetration to maintained load, from straight loading to cyclic loading, to mention just a few basic differences. Frequently, the testing schedule includes variations of the size of the load increments and duration of load-holding, and occasional unloading-reloading events. Unfortunately, instrumenting test piles and performing the test while still using unequal size of load increments, duration of load-holding, and adding unloading-reloading events will adversely affect the means for determine reliable results from the instrumentation records. A couple of case histories are presented to show issues arising from improper procedures involving unequal load increments, different load-holding durations, and unloading and reloading events—indeed, to demonstrate how not to do. The review has shown that an instrumented static loading test, be it a head-down test or a bidirectional test, performed, as it should, in a series of equal load increments, held constant for equal time, and incorporation no unloading-reloading event, will provide data more suitable for analysis than a test performed with unequal increments, unequal load-holding, and incorporating an unloading-reloading event.
    [Show full text]
  • FOUNDATION DESIGN and PRACTICES 16 October 2014
    Seminar on FOUNDATION DESIGN AND PRACTICES 16 October 2014 Venue: Traders Hotel Puteri Harbour Persiaran Puteri Selatan, Puteri Harbour, 79000 Nusajaya, Johor Darul Takzim, Malaysia Jointly organised by: IEM Training Centre Sdn. Bhd. Keller (M) Sdn. Bhd. (All proceeds will go to The Institution of Engineers, Malaysia) BEM Approved CPD Hours = 6.5 . Ref no. (tba) KEYNOTE SPEAKERS Dr. K K Yin Dr. S H Chew Ir. C M Chow INVITED SPEAKERS Er H K Foo Dr. V R Raju Mr. T H Law INTRODUCTION Foundation is a critical component of any construction development. With the ever increasing construction activities and innovative advances in foundation development, numerous types of foundation systems are available. Different structures and geotechnical requirements call for different types of foundation systems. Many times engineers are faced with the difficult decision in deciding the correct foundation system to adopt. This seminar will highlight various aspects of foundation systems, from the viewpoint of design, execution and viability. Professor, consultant and specialist contractor will share their knowledge in this area. Practicing engineers and public are welcome to share their view in this area during the concluding discussion session. SYNOPSIS Keynote Lecture 1 – Foundation Piles versus Ground Treatment – Which is more important? by Asst. Prof. Dr. S H Chew, National University of Singapore It is often said that piles foundation are used to support structures, and ground treatment are used to improve soft ground. However, in many circumferences, the choice of pile foundation or ground treatment was not as easy and as clear. Are these two methods mutually exclusive or there are times that both methods are needed? This presentation will discuss the fundamental nature and strength of these two options.
    [Show full text]