DOCSLIB.ORG

Development of a Robotic System for Cubesat Attitude Determination and Control System Ground Tests Irina Gavrilovich

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Development of a Robotic System for Cubesat Attitude Determination and Control System Ground Tests Irina Gavrilovich Development of a robotic system for CubeSat Attitude Determination and Control System ground tests Irina Gavrilovich To cite this version: Irina Gavrilovich. Development of a robotic system for CubeSat Attitude Determination and Control System ground tests. Automatic. Université Montpellier, 2016. English. NNT : 2016MONTT329. tel-01816985 HAL Id: tel-01816985 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01816985 Submitted on 15 Jun 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. [Tapez une citation prise dans le document ou la synthèse d'un passage intéressant. Vous pouvez placer la Délivré par Université de Montpellier zone de texte n'importe où dans le document. Utilisez l'onglet Outils de zone de texte pour modifier la mise en Préparée au sein de l’école doctorale forme de la zone de texte de la citation.] Information, Structures, Systèmes (I2S) Et de l’unité de recherche Laboratoire d’Informatique, de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier (LIRMM) Spécialité : SYAM Présentée par Irina GAVRILOVICH DEVELOPMENT OF A ROBOTIC SYSTEM FOR CUBESAT ATTITUDE DETERMINATION AND CONTROL SYSTEM GROUND TESTS Soutenue le 14 Décembre 2016 devant le jury composé de Laurent Dusseau Professeur UM, Centre Spatial Universitaire Président François Pierrot DR CNRS LIRMM Directeur Sébastien Krut CR CNRS LIRMM Encadrant Marc Gouttefarde CR CNRS LIRMM Encadrant Gabriel Abba Professeur Université de Lorraine Rapporteur Paolo Tortora Assoc. Prof. Université de Bologne Rapporteur Sabrina Corpino Assist. Prof Ecole Polytechnique de Turin Examinateur RESUME Après le lancement du premier satellite artificiel en 1957, l'évolution de diverses technologies a favorisé la miniaturisation des satellites. En 1999, le développement des nano-satellites modulaires appelés CubeSats, qui ont la forme d'un cube d'un décimètre de côté et une masse de 1 kg à 10 kg, a été initié par un effort commun de l'Université polytechnique de Californie et de l'Université de Stanford. Depuis lors, grâce à l’utilisation de composants électroniques standards à faible coût, les CubeSats se sont largement répandus. Au cours des dernières années, le nombre de CubeSats lancés a régulièrement augmenté, mais moins de la moitié des missions ont atteint leurs objectifs. L'analyse des défaillances des CubeSats montre que la cause la plus évidente est le manque d ’essais adéquats des composants du système ou du système au complet. Parmi les tâches particulièrement difficiles, on compte les essais « hardware-in-the-loop » (HIL) du système de contrôle d'attitude et d'orbite (SCAO) d’un CubeSat. Un système dédié à ces essais doit permettre des simulations fiables de l'environnement spatial et des mouvements réalistes des CubeSats. La façon la plus appropriée d’obtenir de telles conditions d’essai repose sur l’utilisation d’un coussin d'air. Toutefois, les mouvements du satellite sont alors contraints par les limites géométriques, qui sont inhérentes aux coussins d'air. De plus, après 15 années de développements de CubeSats, la liste des systèmes proposés pour tester leur SCAO reste très limitée. Aussi, cette thèse est consacrée à l ’étude et à l a conception d’un système robotique innovant pour des essais HIL du SCAO d’un CubeSat . La nouveauté principale du système d'essai proposé est l’usage de quatre coussins d'air au lieu d'un seul et l’emploi d’ un robot manipulateur. Ce système doit permettre des mouvements non contraints du CubeSat. Outre la conception du système d'essai, cette thèse porte sur les questions liées: (i) à la détermination de l'orientation d’un CubeSat au moyen de mesures sans contact; (ii) au comportement de l’assemblage des coussins d'air; (iii) à l'équilibrage des masses du système. Afin de vérifier la faisabilité de la conception proposée, un prototype du système d'essai a été développé et testé. Plusieurs modifications destinées à en simplifier la structure et à réduire le temps de fabrication ont été effectuées. Un robot Adept Viper s650 est notamment utilisé à la place d'un mécanisme sphérique spécifiquement conçu. Une stratégie de commande est proposée dans le but d’assurer un mouvement adéquat du robot qui doit suivre les rotations du CubeSat. Finalement, les résultats obtenus sont présentés et une évaluation globale du système d'essai est discutée. ABSTRACT After the launch of the first artificial Earth satellite in 1957, the evolution of various technologies has fostered the miniaturization of satellites. In 1999, the development of standardized modular satellites with masses limited to a few kilograms, called CubeSats, was initiated by a joint effort of California Polytechnic State University and Stanford University. Since then, CubeSats became a widespread and significant trend, due to a number of available off-the-shelf low cost components. In last years, the number of launched CubeSats constantly grows, but less than half of all CubeSat missions achieved their goals (either partly or completely). The analysis of these failures shows that the most evident cause is a lack of proper component-level and system- level CubeSat testing. An especially challenging task is Hardware-In-the-Loop (HIL) tests of the Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS). A system devoted to these tests shall offer reliable simulations of the space environment and allow realistic CubeSat motions. The most relevant approach to provide a satellite with such test conditions consists in using air bearing platforms. However, the possible satellite motions are strictly constrained because of geometrical limitations, which are inherent in the air bearing platforms. Despite 15 years of CubeSat history, the list of the air bearing platforms suitable for CubeSat ADCS test is very limited. This thesis is devoted to the design and development of an air bearing testbed for CubeSat ADCS HIL testing. The main novelty of the proposed testbed design consists in using four air bearings instead of one and in utilizing a robotic arm, which allows potentially unconstrained CubeSat motions. Besides the testbed design principle, this thesis deals with the related issues of the determination of the CubeSat orientation by means of contactless measurements, and of the behavior of the air bearings, as well as with the need of a mass balancing method. In order to verify the feasibility of the proposed design, a prototype of the testbed is developed and tested. Several modifications aimed at simplifying the structure and at shortening the fabrication timeline have been made. For this reason, the Adept Viper s650 robot is involved in place of a custom-designed 4DoF robotic arm. A control strategy is proposed in order to provide the robot with a proper motion to follow the CubeSat orientation. Finally, the obtained results are presented and the overall assessment of the proposed testbed is put into perspective. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to acknowledge my thesis director, Prof. François Pierrot, who accepted me as a Ph.D student at the LIRMM and has believed in my research. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my thesis advisors, Sébastien Krut and Marc Gouttefarde, for they continuous support and guidance during these 3 years. Sébastien was the first person who welcomed me at the LIRMM and since then he has always provided me with encouragement and valuable advices whenever it was needed. I am very grateful to him for knowledge he has shared with me and all time he has spent to facilitate my habituation to the new domain. I appreciate all his contributions of energy, ideas and funding to make my research productive. Besides that he has helped me identify my professional strengths and accept them. I would like to thank Marc for his assistant with all my writings and his patience to correct them. I dare to believe that all his efforts to improve my writing skills were not in vain. They both, Sébastien and Marc, have taught me, equally consciously and unconsciously, how good research is done. My research would not have been possible without support of the Montpellier-Nîmes University Space Center (CSU) and funding from the Van Allen Foundation. I wish to thank these organizations and personally Prof. Laurent Dusseau and Prof. Frédéric Saigné for giving me the invaluable opportunity to fulfill myself as a researcher, to present results of my work on several conferences and to write this thesis. I would like to thank my colleagues from the Robotics Department for their readiness to help and to share their experience. Especially, I am grateful to Samah Shayya for his short in time, but very informative introduction to the Simulink Real-Time and Speedgoat target, and to Alonso Sanches who has aided me deal with the Viper robot and provided his C++ code that saved me a good half-year of work. Let me also mention my friends who have been responsible for the entertainment aspects of my life during these years: Nastya, Artem, Andrey, Roman, Viyas. I appreciate their support, advices and all wonderful moments we have spent together, and I hope our friendship will last long despite distances and boarders. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my family that was the most supportive and motivating team I could ever imagine. I warmly thank my mom who bravely let me go in my big journey abroad and has always selflessly supported me in all my pursuits. And I especially thank my beloved husband who has always been on my side during these years.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pocketqube Standard Issue 1 7Th of June, 2018
    The PocketQube Standard Issue 1 7th of June, 2018 The PocketQube Standard June 7, 2018 Contributors: Organization Name Authors Reviewers TU Delft S. Radu S. Radu TU Delft M.S. Uludag M.S. Uludag TU Delft S. Speretta S. Speretta TU Delft J. Bouwmeester J. Bouwmeester TU Delft - A. Menicucci TU Delft - A. Cervone Alba Orbital A. Dunn A. Dunn Alba Orbital T. Walkinshaw T. Walkinshaw Gauss Srl P.L. Kaled Da Cas P.L. Kaled Da Cas Gauss Srl C. Cappelletti C. Cappelletti Gauss Srl - F. Graziani Important Note(s): The latest version of the PocketQube Standard shall be the official version. 2 The PocketQube Standard June 7, 2018 Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Purpose .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 2. PocketQube Specification ......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 General requirements ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Mechanical Requirements ................................................................................................................................. 5 2.2.1 Exterior dimensions ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Based Demonstration of Cubesat Robotic Assembly
    Ground-based Demonstration of CubeSat Robotic Assembly CubeSat Development Workshop 2020 Ezinne Uzo-Okoro, Mary Dahl, Emily Kiley, Christian Haughwout, Kerri Cahoy 1 Motivation: In-Space Small Satellite Assembly Why not build in space? GEO MEO LEO The standardization of electromechanical CubeSat components for compatibility with CubeSat robotic assembly is a key gap 2 Goal: On-Demand On-Orbit Assembled CubeSats LEO Mission Key Phases ➢ Ground Phase: Functional electro/mechanical prototype ➢ ISS Phase: Development and launch of ISS flight unit locker, with CubeSat propulsion option ➢ Free-Flyer Phase: Development of agile free-flyer “locker” satellite with robotic arms to assemble and deploy rapid response CubeSats GEO ➢ Constellation Phase: Development of strategic constellation of agile free-flyer “locker” satellites with robotic Internal View of ‘Locker’ Showing Robotic Assembly arms to autonomously assemble and deploy CubeSats IR Sensors VIS Sensors RF Sensors Propulsion Mission Overview Mission Significance • Orbit-agnostic lockers deploy on-demand robot-assembled CubeSats Provides many CubeSat configurations responsive to • ‘Locker’ is mini-fridge-sized spacecraft with propulsion rapidly evolving space needs capability ✓ Flexible: Selectable sensors and propulsion • Holds robotic arms, sensor, and propulsion modules for ✓ Resilient: Dexterous robot arms for CubeSat assembly 1-3U CubeSats without humans-in-the-loop on Earth and on-orbit Build • Improve response: >30 days to ~hours custom-configured CubeSats on Earth or in space saving
    [Show full text]
  • Spaceflight, Inc. General Payload Users Guide
    Spaceflight, Inc. SF‐2100‐PUG‐00001 Rev F 2015‐22‐15 Payload Users Guide Spaceflight, Inc. General Payload Users Guide 3415 S. 116th St, Suite 123 Tukwila, WA 98168 866.204.1707 spaceflightindustries.com i Spaceflight, Inc. SF‐2100‐PUG‐00001 Rev F 2015‐22‐15 Payload Users Guide Document Revision History Rev Approval Changes ECN No. Sections / Approved Pages CM Date A 2011‐09‐16 Initial Release Updated electrical interfaces and launch B 2012‐03‐30 environments C 2012‐07‐18 Official release Updated electrical interfaces and launch D 2013‐03‐05 environments, reformatted, and added to sections Updated organization and formatting, E 2014‐04‐15 added content on SHERPA, Mini‐SHERPA and ISS launches, updated RPA CG F 2015‐05‐22 Overall update ii Spaceflight, Inc. SF‐2100‐PUG‐00001 Rev F 2015‐22‐15 Payload Users Guide Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Document Overview ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.2 Spaceflight Overview ....................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Hardware Overview ......................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Mission Management Overview .................................................................................................... 10 2 Secondary
    [Show full text]
  • Space Science Beyond the Cubesat
    Deepak, R., Twiggs, R. (2012): JoSS, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 3-7 (Feature article available at www.jossonline.com) www.DeepakPublishing.com www.JoSSonline.com Thinking Out of the Box: Space Science Beyond the CubeSat Ravi A. Deepak 1, Robert J. Twiggs 2 1 Taksha University, , 2 Morehead State University Abstract Over a decade ago, Professors Robert (Bob) Twiggs (then of Stanford University) and Jordi Puig-Suari (CalPoly- SLO) effected a major paradigm shift in space research with the development of the 10-cm CubeSat, helping to provide a new level of student accessibility to space science research once thought impossible. Seeking a means to provide students with hands-on satellite development skills during their limited time at university, and inspired by the successful deployment of six 1-kg, pico-satellites from Stanford’s Orbiting Picosatellite Automatic Launcher (OPAL) in 2000, Twiggs and Puig-Suari ultimately developed the 10-cm CubeSat. In 2003, the first successful CubeSat deployment into orbit demonstrated the very achievable possibilities that lay ahead. By 2008, 60 launch missions later, new industries had arisen around the CubeSat, creating new commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) satellite components and parts, and conventional launch resources became overwhelmed. This article recounts this history and related issues that arose, describes solutions to the issues and subsequent developments in the arena of space science (such as further miniaturization of space research tools), and provides a glimpse of Twiggs’ vision of the future of space research. Mavericks of Space Science With the development of the Cubesat over a decade ago, Bob Twiggs, at Stanford University (now faculty at Morehead State University), (Figure 1) and Jordi Puig-Suari, at California Polytechnic State University (CalPoly) (Figure 2), changed the paradigm of space research, helping to bring a new economy to space sci- ence that would provide accessibility once thought im- possible to University students around the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • Cubesat-Based Science Missions for Geospace and Atmospheric Research
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (NSF) CUBESAT-BASED SCIENCE MISSIONS FOR GEOSPACE AND ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH annual report October 2013 www.nasa.gov www.nsf.gov LETTERS OF SUPPORT 3 CONTACTS 5 NSF PROGRAM OBJECTIVES 6 GSFC WFF OBJECTIVES 8 2013 AND PRIOR PROJECTS 11 Radio Aurora Explorer (RAX) 12 Project Description 12 Scientific Accomplishments 14 Technology 14 Education 14 Publications 15 Contents Colorado Student Space Weather Experiment (CSSWE) 17 Project Description 17 Scientific Accomplishments 17 Technology 18 Education 18 Publications 19 Data Archive 19 Dynamic Ionosphere CubeSat Experiment (DICE) 20 Project Description 20 Scientific Accomplishments 20 Technology 21 Education 22 Publications 23 Data Archive 24 Firefly and FireStation 26 Project Description 26 Scientific Accomplishments 26 Technology 27 Education 28 Student Profiles 30 Publications 31 Cubesat for Ions, Neutrals, Electrons and MAgnetic fields (CINEMA) 32 Project Description 32 Scientific Accomplishments 32 Technology 33 Education 33 Focused Investigations of Relativistic Electron Burst, Intensity, Range, and Dynamics (FIREBIRD) 34 Project Description 34 Scientific Accomplishments 34 Education 34 2014 PROJECTS 35 Oxygen Photometry of the Atmospheric Limb (OPAL) 36 Project Description 36 Planned Scientific Accomplishments 36 Planned Technology 36 Planned Education 37 (NSF) CUBESAT-BASED SCIENCE MISSIONS FOR GEOSPACE AND ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH [ 1 QB50/QBUS 38 Project Description 38 Planned Scientific Accomplishments 38 Planned
    [Show full text]
  • L-8: Enabling Human Spaceflight Exploration Systems & Technology
    Johnson Space Center Engineering Directorate L-8: Enabling Human Spaceflight Exploration Systems & Technology Development Public Release Notice This document has been reviewed for technical accuracy, business/management sensitivity, and export control compliance. It is Montgomery Goforth suitable for public release without restrictions per NF1676 #37965. November 2016 www.nasa.gov 1 NASA’s Journey to Mars Engineering Priorities 1. Enhance ISS: Enhanced missions and systems reliability per ISS customer needs 2. Accelerate Orion: Safe, successful, affordable, and ahead of schedule 3. Enable commercial crew success 4. Human Spaceflight (HSF) exploration systems development • Technology required to enable exploration beyond LEO • System and subsystem development for beyond LEO HSF exploration JSC Engineering’s Internal Goal for Exploration • Priorities are nice, but they are not enough. • We needed a meaningful goal. • We needed a deadline. • Our Goal: Get within 8 years of launching humans to Mars (L-8) by 2025 • Develop and mature the technologies and systems needed • Develop and mature the personnel needed L-8 Characterizing L-8 JSC Engineering: HSF Exploration Systems Development • L-8 Is Not: • A program to go to Mars • Another Technology Road-Mapping effort • L-8 Is: • A way to translate Agency Technology Roadmaps and Architectures/Scenarios into a meaningful path for JSC Engineering to follow. • A way of focusing Engineering’s efforts and L-8 identifying our dependencies • A way to ensure Engineering personnel are ready to step up
    [Show full text]
  • Space Biology Research and Biosensor Technologies: Past, Present, and Future †
    biosensors Perspective Space Biology Research and Biosensor Technologies: Past, Present, and Future † Ada Kanapskyte 1,2, Elizabeth M. Hawkins 1,3,4, Lauren C. Liddell 5,6, Shilpa R. Bhardwaj 5,7, Diana Gentry 5 and Sergio R. Santa Maria 5,8,* 1 Space Life Sciences Training Program, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA; [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (E.M.H.) 2 Biomedical Engineering Department, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA 3 KBR Wyle, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 4 Mammoth Biosciences, Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA 5 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA; [email protected] (L.C.L.); [email protected] (S.R.B.); [email protected] (D.G.) 6 Logyx, LLC, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA 7 The Bionetics Corporation, Yorktown, VA 23693, USA 8 COSMIAC Research Institute, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-650-604-1411 † Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Biosensors, 2–17 November 2020; Available online: https://iecb2020.sciforum.net/. Abstract: In light of future missions beyond low Earth orbit (LEO) and the potential establishment of bases on the Moon and Mars, the effects of the deep space environment on biology need to be examined in order to develop protective countermeasures. Although many biological experiments have been performed in space since the 1960s, most have occurred in LEO and for only short periods of time. These LEO missions have studied many biological phenomena in a variety of model organisms, and have utilized a broad range of technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Washington Institute for Near East Policy August
    THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY n AUGUST 2020 n PN84 PHOTO CREDIT: REUTERS © 2020 THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. FARZIN NADIMI n April 22, 2020, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Aerospace Force (IRGC-ASF) Olaunched its first-ever satellite, the Nour-1, into orbit. The launch, conducted from a desert platform near Shahrud, about 210 miles northeast of Tehran, employed Iran’s new Qased (“messenger”) space- launch vehicle (SLV). In broad terms, the launch showed the risks of lifting arms restrictions on Iran, a pursuit in which the Islamic Republic enjoys support from potential arms-trade partners Russia and China. Practically, lifting the embargo could facilitate Iran’s unhindered access to dual-use materials and other components used to produce small satellites with military or even terrorist applications. Beyond this, the IRGC’s emerging military space program proves its ambition to field larger solid-propellant missiles. Britain, France, and Germany—the EU-3 signatories of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as the 2015 Iran nuclear deal is known—support upholding the arms embargo until 2023. The United States, which has withdrawn from the deal, started a process on August 20, 2020, that could lead to a snapback of all UN sanctions enacted since 2006.1 The IRGC’s Qased space-launch vehicle, shown at the Shahrud site The Qased-1, for its part, succeeded over its three in April. stages in placing the very small Nour-1 satellite in a near circular low earth orbit (LEO) of about 425 km. The first stage involved an off-the-shelf Shahab-3/ Ghadr liquid-fuel missile, although without the warhead section, produced by the Iranian Ministry of Defense.2 According to ASF commander Gen.
    [Show full text]
  • Cubesat Mission: from Design to Operation
    applied sciences Article CubeSat Mission: From Design to Operation Cristóbal Nieto-Peroy 1 and M. Reza Emami 1,2,* 1 Onboard Space Systems Group, Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, Space Campus, 981 92 Kiruna, Sweden 2 Aerospace Mechatronics Group, University of Toronto Institute for Aerospace Studies, Toronto, ON M3H 5T6, Canada * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-416-946-3357 Received: 30 June 2019; Accepted: 29 July 2019; Published: 1 August 2019 Featured Application: Design, fabrication, testing, launch and operation of a particular CubeSat are detailed, as a reference for prospective developers of CubeSat missions. Abstract: The current success rate of CubeSat missions, particularly for first-time developers, may discourage non-profit organizations to start new projects. CubeSat development teams may not be able to dedicate the resources that are necessary to maintain Quality Assurance as it is performed for the reliable conventional satellite projects. This paper discusses the structured life-cycle of a CubeSat project, using as a reference the authors’ recent experience of developing and operating a 2U CubeSat, called qbee50-LTU-OC, as part of the QB50 mission. This paper also provides a critique of some of the current poor practices and methodologies while carrying out CubeSat projects. Keywords: CubeSat; miniaturized satellite; nanosatellite; small satellite development 1. Introduction There have been nearly 1000 CubeSats launched to the orbit since the inception of the concept in 2000 [1]. An up-to-date statistics of CubeSat missions can be found in Reference [2]. A summary of CubeSat missions up to 2016 can also be found in Reference [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Laser Ranging to Steccosat Nanosatellite
    5th IAA Conference on University Satellite Missions and CubeSat Workshop STECCOsat: a laser ranged nanosatellite. Claudio Paris 1, Stefano Carletta 2 1 Centro Fermi – Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche Enrico Fermi 2 Scuola di Ingegneria Aerospaziale, Sapienza Università di Roma Scuola di Ingegneria Aerospaziale STECCOsat Mission description Satellite (figure) Payloads Orbit Attitude stabilization STECCOSAT: A LASER RANGED 5TH IAA CONFERENCE ON P. 2 NANOSATELLITE UNIVERSITY SATELLITE MISSIONS AND CUBESAT WORKSHOP STECCOsat STECCO Space Travelling Egg-Controlled Catadioptric Object 6P PocketQube • Volume: 33x5x5 cm3 • Mass:1 kg • Max power:3.04 W Mission overview • Launch: Q3 2020 into UNISAT 7 by Gauss srl • SSO orbit @ altitude of 400-600 km • Orbit parameters considered for the analysis: • Inclination: 97.79 deg • Altitude: 570 km • Eccentricity: 0 STECCOSAT: A LASER RANGED 5TH IAA CONFERENCE ON P. 3 NANOSATELLITE UNIVERSITY SATELLITE MISSIONS AND CUBESAT WORKSHOP STECCOsat STECCO Space Travelling Egg-Controlled Catadioptric Object 6P PocketQube • Volume: 33x5x5 cm3 • Mass:1 kg • Max power:3.04 W Goals of the mission (payload) • Testing laser ranging capabilities on nanosats • Testing innovative ADCS strategies and devices • Magnetometer-only attitude determination • Liquid reaction wheels • Passive viscous spin damper • Validating SRAM based OBC for PocketQube STECCOSAT: A LASER RANGED 5TH IAA CONFERENCE ON P. 4 NANOSATELLITE UNIVERSITY SATELLITE MISSIONS AND CUBESAT WORKSHOP STECCOsat Payload for Satellite Laser Ranging: 24.5 mm COTS cube corner reflectors. STECCOSAT: A LASER RANGED 5TH IAA CONFERENCE ON P. 5 NANOSATELLITE UNIVERSITY SATELLITE MISSIONS AND CUBESAT WORKSHOP Satellite Laser Ranging Ground stations: Nd:Yag lasers/ Nd:Van lasers @ 532 nm Repetition rate: 4-10 Hz to > 1 kHz Pulse width: 30-100 ps to 10 ps Pulse energy: 10-100 mJ to < 1 mJ ퟏ Range: R= ퟐ (theoretically, in vacuum) STECCOSAT: A LASER RANGED 5TH IAA CONFERENCE ON P.
    [Show full text]
  • Deployable Modular Frame for Inflatable Space Habitats
    70th International Astronautical Congress (IAC), Washington D.C., United States, 21-25 October 2019. Copyright ©2019 by the International Astronautical Federation (IAF). All rights reserved. IAC-19,B3,8-GTS.2,4,x48931 DMF: Deployable Modular Frame for Inflatable Space Habitats Vittorio Netti1, * 1University of Houston, [email protected] *Corresponding author Abstract Inflatable Space Modules for space exploration are now a reality. In 2016, Bigelow Aerospace tested the first inflatable module Bigelow Expandable Activity Module (BEAM) on the International Space Station (ISS), achieving success. This technology has higher volume limits than other launchers, substantially changing the previous concepts of construction and life in space. Nevertheless, inflatable modules technology lacks a reliable and functional platform to efficiently use all this space. Due to its limited dimension, the International Standard Payload Rack (ISPR), currently used on ISS, is not suitable for this purpose. The project aims at developing a new standard for payload rack in the inflatable space modules: the Deployable Modular Frame (DMF). The DMF expands itself radially from the center of the module, starting from four structural pylons. It creates a solid infrastructure allowing for the configuration of a variety of spaces, including storage space, laboratories, workstations and living quarters. The DMF consists of two main parts: the Deployable Frame (DF) and the Modular Rack (MR). Once the frame is deployed, it provides four linear slots suitable to install the modular racks. The rack is the basic element that allows for the storage of equipment inside the frame. Once they are installed, the racks can slide on the frame’s rails, dynamically changing the space inside the module.
    [Show full text]
  • Rebreather BCD User Manual Rebreather BCD User Manual Chapter 1 Page 1
    Rebreather BCD User Manual Rebreather BCD User Manual Chapter 1 Page 1 The Rebreather BCD The rebreather BCD is the first of its kind and features include integrated exchangeable lungs, weight system and the Poseidon individual patch system. The rebreather BCD is constructed to the highest quality and durability using ballistic nylon*, YKK zippers and hand crafted detailing. Material Premium black version in Nylon 1680. 3 color versions in red, blue and grey made in Cordura 1000. YKK Waterproof Zippers. Inflator with stainless steel mechanism. Technical features Integrated Counter Lungs, Integrated weightpockets, case for crotch strap, velcro for patches or gauntlet. Approvals/Certifications The BCD are approved according to the EU Directive for Personal Protective Equipment, 89/686/EEC and meets or exceed the requirements of: EN 1809:1997. Type examination certificate number 6403 A/09/16 PSA (Revision 1) Issued by; DEKRA EXAM GmbH Persönliche Schutzausrüstungen, Gasmessgeräte Adlerstraße 29 * 45307 Essen Germany Notified body number 0158. Text, photographs and figures copyright © 2008-2012 by Poseidon Diving Systems AB. Poseidon Diving Systems AB is certified according to ISO 9001 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Manual Version 1.0 - February 2012. Rebreather BCD User Manual Chapter 1 Page 2 WARNING: WARNING: Read user’s manual before use. You must be familiar with the procedure to drop weights in case of an emergency ascent. This is not a lifejacket: it does not guarantee a head up position of the Practice this procedure prior to your first use of your BCD in a perfectly wearer at the surface. safe environment, i.e. in confined water which is not deeper than 3 meters.
    [Show full text]