November 06-NARFE-1-9/5
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
OMA Government Affairs Committee Meeting Materials
Table of Contents Page # Government Affairs Agenda 3 Manufacturers’ Evening Invitation 4 Committee Guest Bios 5 March 14, 2012 OMA Counsel Report Tort Reform Case Decision: Havel v. Villa St. 8 Joseph Marijuana Ballot Initiatives and Potential 10 Concerns for Ohio Manufacturers Ohio Supreme Court Contest 2012 13 Election Results List by Hannah News 14 Public Policy Report 19 Leadership News Articles 21 Legislative Update 32 Announcing the Ohio Steel Council 40 Ohio Prosperity Project 2012 Participant Engagement 41 Summit NAM Public Affairs Conference 2012 43 Energy 48 Environment 80 Tax 100 Workers’ Compensation 115 Human Resources 124 2012 Government Affairs OMA Government Affairs Committee Meeting Sponsor: Committee Calendar Wednesday, March 14, 2012 Wednesday, June 6, 2012 Thursday, September 20, 2012 Wednesday, November 14, 2012 Additional committee meetings or teleconferences, if needed, will be scheduled at the call of the Chair. Page 1 of 133 Page 2 of 133 OMA Government Affairs Committee March 14, 2012 AGENDA Welcome & Self-Introductions Jeff Fritz DuPont Committee Chair Ohio Primary Election Review Federal Highlights Barry Doggett Boiler & Utility MACT / NAM Conference Eaton Corporation NAM Regional Vice Chair OMA Counsel’s Report Kurt Tunnell Civil Justice / Ballot Issues / Supreme Court Bricker & Eckler, LLP Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Luke Harms New State Level Trend Whirlpool Manufacturing Advocacy Robert Lapp Ohio Steel Council Formed, Vertical Groups & OMA, The Timken Company Ohio Prosperity Project Food Manufacturing Dialogue Lee Anderson General Mills Staff Reports Ryan Augsburger Tax, Workers’ Comp, Energy, Environment The Ohio Manufacturers’ Association Kevin Schmidt The Ohio Manufacturers’ Association Honorable Ross McGregor Special Guests Ohio House of Representatives Honorable Kristina Roegner Ohio House of Representatives Workplace Freedom Polling Presentation Jeff Longstreth Ohio 2.0 Hans Kaiser Moore Information Committee Meetings begin at 10:00 a.m. -
Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012
Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012 Jennifer E. Manning Information Research Specialist Colleen J. Shogan Deputy Director and Senior Specialist November 26, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL30261 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012 Summary Ninety-four women currently serve in the 112th Congress: 77 in the House (53 Democrats and 24 Republicans) and 17 in the Senate (12 Democrats and 5 Republicans). Ninety-two women were initially sworn in to the 112th Congress, two women Democratic House Members have since resigned, and four others have been elected. This number (94) is lower than the record number of 95 women who were initially elected to the 111th Congress. The first woman elected to Congress was Representative Jeannette Rankin (R-MT, 1917-1919, 1941-1943). The first woman to serve in the Senate was Rebecca Latimer Felton (D-GA). She was appointed in 1922 and served for only one day. A total of 278 women have served in Congress, 178 Democrats and 100 Republicans. Of these women, 239 (153 Democrats, 86 Republicans) have served only in the House of Representatives; 31 (19 Democrats, 12 Republicans) have served only in the Senate; and 8 (6 Democrats, 2 Republicans) have served in both houses. These figures include one non-voting Delegate each from Guam, Hawaii, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Currently serving Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) holds the record for length of service by a woman in Congress with 35 years (10 of which were spent in the House). -
The Long Red Thread How Democratic Dominance Gave Way to Republican Advantage in Us House of Representatives Elections, 1964
THE LONG RED THREAD HOW DEMOCRATIC DOMINANCE GAVE WAY TO REPUBLICAN ADVANTAGE IN U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTIONS, 1964-2018 by Kyle Kondik A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Baltimore, Maryland September 2019 © 2019 Kyle Kondik All Rights Reserved Abstract This history of U.S. House elections from 1964-2018 examines how Democratic dominance in the House prior to 1994 gave way to a Republican advantage in the years following the GOP takeover. Nationalization, partisan realignment, and the reapportionment and redistricting of House seats all contributed to a House where Republicans do not necessarily always dominate, but in which they have had an edge more often than not. This work explores each House election cycle in the time period covered and also surveys academic and journalistic literature to identify key trends and takeaways from more than a half-century of U.S. House election results in the one person, one vote era. Advisor: Dorothea Wolfson Readers: Douglas Harris, Matt Laslo ii Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………....ii List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………..iv List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………..v Introduction: From Dark Blue to Light Red………………………………………………1 Data, Definitions, and Methodology………………………………………………………9 Chapter One: The Partisan Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution in the United States House of Representatives, 1964-1974…………………………...…12 Chapter 2: The Roots of the Republican Revolution: -
Chairmen Insist on Public Plan Blue Dogs Remain Opposed
VOL. 54, NO. 143 WEDNESDAY, JUNE 10, 2009 $3.75 Chairmen Insist On Public Plan Blue Dogs Remain Opposed By Steven T. Dennis and Tory Newmyer ROLL CALL STAFF House Democratic chairmen plan to disregard conservative Blue Dogs who are opposing a government-sponsored health in- surance plan as part of a sweeping reform bill, in what is shaping up to be the biggest internal battle of President Barack Obama’s young agenda. Just days after Blue Dogs insist- ed that no public option be includ- Bill Clark/Roll Call ed in the package — except as a Sen. Chris Dodd, seen at a news conference Tuesday on the impact of high health costs, is right in possible fallback that could be the middle of issues at the top of the Congressional agenda — and he faces a tough re-election fight. “triggered” years from now — the File Photo powerful chairmen unveiled a draft Rep. Charlie Rangel: “We’re bill that strongly backs a public op- going to have a public plan.” Dodd Juggles Triple Challenge tion without such a trigger. “There won’t be any considera- of writing the bill — Rangel, En- By David M. Drucker Housing and Urban Affairs chair- tion of the trigger,” Ways and ergy and Commerce Chairman and Emily Pierce K Street has mixed views of man, but he also is acting as a stand- Means Chairman Charlie Rangel Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and ROLL CALL STAFF health proposal, p. 9. in for an ailing Health, Education, (D-N.Y.) said. “We’re going to Education and Labor Chairman President Barack Obama’s am- Labor and Pensions Chairman Ed- have a public plan and we’re not George Miller (D-Calif.) — re- bitious goals of rewriting the books thin Sen. -
U.S. Senate Ohio Supreme Court
U.S. Senate Ohio Supreme Court Rob Portman Pat DeWine The Ohio Society of CPAs has Judge DeWine earns OSCPA’s endorsement announced its endorsement of Sen. Rob because of his commitment to judicial Portman for re-election. restraint and his solid experience on the First District Court of Appeals and Hamilton “The committee was impressed by County Court of Common Pleas. He the breadth of work Sen. Portman impressed the committee with his history of has accomplished and his extensive favorable opinions that resulted in positive knowledge and efforts on topics outcomes benefiting Ohioans. important to Ohio’s business community,” said Scott Wiley, CAE, Patrick Fischer president and CEO. Judge Fischer’s vast experience, including “He outlined his work to reform Ohio’s 25 years as a practitioner and six years on drug addiction problems, and shared the First District Court of Appeals, along concerns about the new Department of with his guiding philosophy of judicial Labor overtime rules and minimum wage restraint, earned OSCPA’s endorsement. The hikes, in each case offering solutions, Society particularly appreciates his belief not just platitudes.” that judges should enforce the Constitution and statutes as written, and not make Portman’s efforts to work across the decisions based on personal views. aisle and his commitment to driving a strong U.S. economy were key factors Maureen O’Connor securing his endorsement for another OSCPA endorsed Chief Justice O’Connor six-year term in the U.S. Senate. for her strong voting record of judicial restraint during the past 13 years on the bench. -
Breaking New Ground Phoenix Children’S New Emergency Department and Trauma Center and Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders LETTER from STEVE
FALL 2017 PHOENIX CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION Breaking New Ground Phoenix Children’s new Emergency Department and Trauma Center and Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders LETTER FROM STEVE Dear Friends: We have so many milestones to celebrate as 2017 comes to a close. This fall, Phoenix Children’s Hospital opened the doors of its new Emergency Department and Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center, as well as its new Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders. Both are state-of-the-art facilities with the space, resources and systems to provide more children in need with the best possible care. These centers are so much more than the sum of their parts. They are the new homes of two of Phoenix Children’s nationally recognized programs. They are the homes away from home for the thousands of children who are already receiving the best emergency care and cancer treatment available in Arizona. And they represent another step forward on our journey to becoming a world-class, destination hospital — for Arizona, the Southwest and the entire nation. These milestones simply would not have been possible without your incredible generosity. Not only have you helped Phoenix Children’s up its game for children, over the past 12 months you have gone above and beyond for so many of the programs that our patients rely on — programs that exist because of your philanthropy. As you know, at Phoenix Children’s, we are always striving to do more for children. We see these milestones as opportunities — to foster innovation and discovery; to bring cutting-edge therapies to our patients; and to attract the highest-caliber physicians to our hospital — and in so doing, give every child that passes through our doors the best chance in life. -
Administration of Barack H. Obama, 2010 Remarks at a Fundraiser
Administration of Barack H. Obama, 2010 Remarks at a Fundraiser for Governor Theodore Strickland in Columbus, Ohio August 18, 2010 Thank you, everybody! Thank you, Ohio! Please, have a seat. Have a seat. Thank you so much. It is great to be here. There are a couple of people I want to make sure to acknowledge. They may have already been acknowledged, but not by me. So I'm going to acknowledge them because they are doing outstanding work: First of all, the mayor of the great city of Columbus, Michael Coleman; a champion of working families not just in Ohio, but all across the country, Senator Sherrod Brown; a wonderful Member of Congress who's fighting day in, day out, Mary Jo Kilroy is here; and although he is not on the list, he's down a little south from here but he's here, I saw him, so I want to acknowledge him because he is just an outstanding, outstanding young Member of Congress, Steve Driehaus is in the house. There he is. Lieutenant Governor and soon to be Senator, Lee Fisher is here. Attorney General Rich Cordray is here. Treasurer Kevin Boyce is in the house. And candidate for Lieutenant Governor, Yvette McGee Brown is here. It is good to be back in Ohio. And it is good to be among such good friends, because as I look out over the audience, I know so many of you worked so hard on behalf of our campaign. You were there when we were up; you were there when we were down. -
2018 Post-General Election Update
2018 post-general election update November 7, 2018 On Tuesday, November 6, 2018, Ohioans cast ballots in the 2018 general election. For the first time since 2006, five statewide elected offices were up for election without an incumbent running in the 2018 general election. Federal offices, including all Ohio U.S. Representatives seats and one U.S. Senate seat, two Ohio Supreme Court seats, all seats in the Ohio House of Representatives and 17 Ohio Senate seats were on the ballot. Many counties in Ohio and around the country reported record- breaking early voter turnout. Nearly 1.5 million ballots were requested by mail and in person, and an estimated 1.3 million had been cast as of the close of early voting on November 5, 2018. Here is Bricker & Eckler’s overview of the 2018 general election results and details on races of particular interest. STATEWIDE BALLOT ISSUES Issue 1: This proposed constitutional amendment was filed as the “Neighborhood Safety, Drug Treatment, and Rehabilitation Amendment.” If adopted, the amendment would have, among other things, required reductions in sentencing in certain situations, mandated that certain criminal offenses or uses of any drugs, such as fentanyl and heroin, can only be classified as a misdemeanor, and prohibited jail time as a sentence for obtaining, possessing or using such drugs until an individual’s third offense within 24 months. Issue 1 was defeated by 63.41 percent. The Ohio Safe and Healthy Communities Campaign led the way in support of the proposed constitutional amendment. Supporters of Issue 1 were financially supported by Open Society Policy Center, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative and the Open Philanthropy Project Action Fund. -
Phoenix Rising: Social Movement in an Sb 1070
PHOENIX RISING: SOCIAL MOVEMENT IN AN SB 1070 ARIZONA A THESIS SUBMITTED ON THE THIRD DAY OF MAY 2013 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SCHOOL OF LIBERAL ARTS OF TULANE UNIVERSITY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS BY ______________________________________ Ryan Riedel APPROVED: ______________________________________ Jimmy Huck,Ph.D., Thesis Director ______________________________________ Jennifer Ashley, Ph.D. ______________________________________ Ana Margarida Esteves, Ph.D ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank the members of my thesis committee for their guidance, support and patience in bringing this work to completion. You have my respect and admiration, and I am fortunate to have spent so much time in your classrooms and company. Professor Ana Servigna inspired the third chapter of this thesis. Her lessons stick with me every day, in my footsteps as I trod roughshod through the politics of public space. Thank you. I would also like to thank Luis Avila and Janey Pearl, who contributed valuable perspective and a kindness of friendship for which I am both grateful and in your debt. Finally, I would like to thank my New Orleans people: Lind and Jackson, Chess, Ball, Dawn Skinner Snead, Diana and Matt Soto, John Gibler, Isaac, Sandy, Russell and Buddy. And my Guatemala person: CB. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...ii List of Figures…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….iv Introduction: Phoenix Rising………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………1 Chapter One: The Calle Dieciseis Mural Project………………………………………………………………………………………….9 Chapter Two: Citizens for a Better Arizona……………………………………………………………………………………………….30 Chapter Three: Fuel for a Movement……………………………………………………………………………………………………….52 Appendix……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…68 References……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….76 Biography…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………85 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure One. -
17 Prop 121.Fm
Elección General ~ Noviembre 6 de 2012 PROPOSICIÓN 121 TÍTULO OFICIAL UNA MEDIDA DE INICIATIVA CREANDO UNA PRIMARIA ABIERTA DANDO A TODOS LOS ELECTORES CALIFICADOS EL DERECHO DE VOTAR POR LOS CANDIDA- TOS DE SU ELECCIÓN, PROPONIENDO UNA ENMIENDA A LA CONSTITUCIÓN DE ARIZONA; ENMENDANDO EL ARTÍCULO VII DE LA CON- STITUCIÓN DE ARIZONA RELACIONADO CON LA LEY DE ELECCIÓN DIRECTA PRIMARIA TEXTO DE LA ENMIENDA PROPUESTA Que sea promulgado por el Pueblo del Estado de Arizona: Sección 1. Título. Esta enmienda por iniciativa deberá ser conocida como “Decreto de Elecciones Abiertas/Gobierno Abierto”. Sección 2. Propósito. A. Esta iniciativa asegurará que cada persona calificada para votar, incluyendo aquellas no afiliadas a cualquier partido político, tenga el derecho a votar en cualquier elección por cualquier candidato, sin importar la afiliación del votante o la afiliación de un/a candidato/a a un partido o la falta de afiliación a un partido. B. Para ofrecer más opciones a todos los votantes y candidatos de Arizona, esta proposición: (1) Abole el sistema existente de elecciones primarias financiado por los contribuyentes de impuestos para seleccionar a los nominados de partidos políticos. (2) Crea en su lugar una Elección Primaria Abierta de los “Principales Dos”, en la cual todos los candidatos a un cargo aparecen juntos en la misma boleta electoral y todos los electores calificados (sin importar su afiliación a un partido o la falta de la misma) pueden votar por el candidato de su elección. Los dos candidatos recibiendo los totales más altos de votos para cada cargo entonces pasarían a enfrentarse entre sí en la elección general. -
I Went Down to the Crossroads: Lifting the Blindfold About the Origin of 501(C)(4) Political Advertisements
I Went Down to the Crossroads: Lifting the Blindfold About the Origin of 501(c)(4) Political Advertisements By ANDREW C. B YRNES & C ORTLIN H. L ANNIN* Introduction ON JANUARY 21, 2010, the Supreme Court dropped a bomb on American politics. Coinciding with a powerful backlash in corporate boardrooms and among the conservative establishment against Presi- dent Obama and the Democratic Party-controlled Congress, and bol- stered by the media-beloved “tea party” movement, the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission1 transformed the American political landscape. The decision helped Republicans retake both houses of Congress in the 2010 elections and signals a change in the locus of electoral influence from parties and candi- dates, whose donors are disclosed, toward third party organizations, many with undisclosed contributors.2 The expenditure of large amounts of money to impact American elections did not begin with Citizens United.3 Nonetheless, since the * Mr. Byrnes is a partner, and Mr. Lannin is an associate of Covington & Burling, LLP. This Article represents only their personal views and does not necessarily reflect the views of Covington & Burling LLP, or any of its clients, attorneys and affiliates. Thanks to Robert Lenhard and Kevin Shortill for their feedback and guidance, and to Jonathan Chou for first-rate research assistance. 1. Citizens United v. FEC, 130 S. Ct. 876 (2010). 2. Id. at 940 (Stevens, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (arguing that the ruling distorts BCRA’s regulatory scheme in favor of corporations/unions as opposed to parties); R. SAM G ARRETT, C ONG. -
The Power of the Latino Vote in America They Tipped Elections in 2008; Where Will They Be in 2010?
The Power of the Latino Vote in America They Tipped Elections in 2008; Where Will they be in 2010? February 2010 LATINO VOTER TRENDS IN RECENT ELECTION CYCLES Over the past decade, Latino voters have steadily increased their political power, and made a decisive impact in races at all levels, including the Presidency. In 2010, Latino voters are poised to play a crucial role in key House and Senate races across the country. Many analysts have noted that as the Latino electorate grows in size and power, candidates from all political parties must take their views into account to remain viable in an increasing number of House and Senate races as well as future Presidential contests. While trending Democratic overall, at least one segment of the Latino electorate—foreign‐born, naturalized U.S. citizens of Latino descent, who represent 40% of the Latino voter population—has proven to be a true swing constituency. Candidates for political office in 2010, elected officials, and political strategists would be wise to not just look at how Latino voters are likely to vote this cycle, but why. This report lays out trends in Latino voting patterns over the last several years, and examines some of the factors that motivate and influence this segment of the electorate. The report features a list of “Races to Watch”—forty battleground House and Senate contests where Latino voters will play a key role—and details the Congressional districts where Latino voting power is most concentrated. The Latino Vote is Growing – In Size and Geographic Diversity For the past few election cycles, Latino voters have been making an impact at ballot boxes throughout the country.