DOCSLIB.ORG

CITY of NORWICH DRAFT BROWNFIELD OPPORTUNITY AREA REVITALIZATION PLAN Step 2 Nomination Study City of Norwich, New York

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CITY of NORWICH DRAFT BROWNFIELD OPPORTUNITY AREA REVITALIZATION PLAN Step 2 Nomination Study City of Norwich, New York CITY OF NORWICH DRAFT BROWNFIELD OPPORTUNITY AREA REVITALIZATION PLAN Step 2 Nomination Study City of Norwich, New York December 2017 This interim draft of the City of Norwich BOA Revitalization Plan was prepared with the assistance of: Shelter Planning and Development Contact: Robert Murray Phone: (518) 798-6627 Email: [email protected] The LA Group, PC Contact: James Martin Phone: (518) 587-8100 Email: [email protected] E.M. Pemrick and Co. Contact: Ellen Pemrick Phone: (518) 882-9535 Email: [email protected] This draft report was prepared for the City of Norwich and the New York State Department of State with state funds provided through the Brownfield Opportunity Areas Program. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Revitalization Plan represents Step 2 of the Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA) Program for the City of Norwich. The City of Norwich completed a Pre-Nomination study in January of 2009 that detailed a conceptual strategy for the City. This study produced an initial analysis of key properties and projects throughout the study area that have the potential to be returned to productive use as well as serve as catalysts for future revitalization. This report represents the second step in the planning process. It gives a better-defined, more detailed look at key properties throughout the area initially identified in the Pre-Nomination study. Subsequent analyses by the City and the ROP steering committee resulted in minor changes to the boundary area, and in the removal of a number of properties that were considered non-essential in this process. The final Nomination product (Step #3) will focus more closely on a smaller number of sites. The Steering Committee was comprised of: Christine Carnrike, Mayor, City of Norwich; Dee DuFour, Director of Finance; Robert Jeffrey, Northeast Classic Car Museum; Peg LoPresti, NBT Bank; Ann Coe, Norwich Business Improvement District Management Association (BIDMA); Anna McLaughlin, McLaughlin’s Dept. Store; and Alex Larsen, Commerce Chenango and Development Chenango. An Economic and Market Trends Analysis was completed as part of the Revitalization Plan for the City. It analyzes demographic characteristics, economic conditions, industry trends, and real estate market conditions, and is designed to identify potential opportunities for the proposed BOA study area. An Economic and Market Trends Analysis was completed as part of a Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA) Revitalization Plan for the City of Norwich, New York. It analyzes demographic characteristics, economic conditions, industry trends, and real estate market conditions, and is designed to identify potential opportunities for the proposed BOA study area. Key observations and conclusions are listed below and the full study can be found in Appendix D. Low median household income levels and the limited financial assets of residents in the City restrict consumer spending potential. There is a need to attract consumers from the surrounding area and capitalize on the large number of people who work in Norwich but live elsewhere. The development of quality market-rate rental housing in the City could help to attract or retain young professionals who would spend money at local businesses. Retail development along Route 12 in the Town of Norwich has had a long-term negative impact on the City, drawing businesses, customers, and traffic away from the downtown commercial district. The number of retailers in the City is less than half what it was in 1997, and the City’s share of total retail sales in Chenango County has fallen below 20% (from about 50% in the 1990s). Despite a decrease in the number of eating and drinking places, however, the City accounts for an estimated 35% of the county’s restaurant sales. Food service establishments may be a potential niche area for the City. The retail trade area, defined as being within a 30-minute drive time of downtown Norwich, encompasses almost all of Chenango County and parts of southwestern Otsego County. Although population trends are similar to those in the City, the trade area has a higher percentage of married-couple families with children, a larger share of households in peak earning years (ages 35-54), and a much higher rate of homeownership than the City overall. Norwich has many long-running, highly successful festivals and events that draw residents and visitors to the city. These include the Chenango Blues Festival, Gus Macker Basketball Tournament, Colorscape Chenango Arts Festival, and the Chenango County Fair. However, the lack of quality lodging in the City serves as a major barrier to increasing the economic impact of tourism and business travel. Although the size of the resident labor force has been stagnant to declining over the last 25 years, unemployment rates in Chenango County are typically close to state averages, and the manufacturing sector is in relatively good shape, with several companies investing in expansion projects. Agriculture, especially dairy farming, represents a major component of the Chenango County economy. Local leaders and organizations recognize the need to promote agricultural economic development and improve the economics of farming. Vacant and underutilized industrial buildings in the City of Norwich, especially those with rail access, could be used for the distribution and processing of local agricultural products. With the exception of large employers like NBT Bank that have their own buildings, most businesses that utilize offices are small and their needs can usually be met by existing structures in the City. As a result, there is little unmet demand for office space. The industrial real estate market in Norwich is characterized as “very soft.” Buildings suitable for manufacturing and warehousing generally sit on the market for long periods of time. A property that housed Norwich Aero until parent company Esterline relocated its operations to Mexico has been vacant since June 2016, and the price has been reduced from $1,495,000 to $799,000. Housing issues in the City of Norwich include a shortage of quality rental units – more than two-thirds of rental housing units are more than 50 years old – and the need for senior housing, including assisted living facilities. There is also an ongoing need for funding to make repairs and improvements to the large number of older housing units. With assistance from the City’s consultants, the Steering Committee has drafted a set of recommendations for the Revitalization Plan. Opportunity #1 – Application for Step 3 - Implementation Strategy and Site Assessments Seek advice and assistance from NYSDOS on the next round of funding through the NYSDOS Brownfields Program for Step 3 - Implementation Strategy and Site Assessments. Follow through with the preparation of an application for grant funding to implement the recommendations in this plan. Opportunity #2 - Create a Powerful and Unified Marketing Message for the City Develop and implement a regional branding and promotion program that will serve as a unifying strategy to promote the region’s quality of life and capacity for innovation. Ideally, it will ignite a strong community pride campaign that builds leadership and entrepreneurship, and results in successful branding through local ambassadors. The branding and marketing plan should focus on the downtown core, Museum District, Heritage Block, and signature cultural events and festivals. Opportunity #3 - Fully Develop and Implement Plans for the Museum District Create a sense of arrival for the Museum District through the streetscape improvement plan provided in this document. Continue to advance the streetscape concept for the Museum District. Provide an updated cost estimate for improvements. See Appendix E for concept and 2014 cost estimate. Seek funding for implementation of the recommended improvements. Opportunity #4 - Implement the Heritage Block Redevelopment Project Advance the planned elements in the Concept Plan developed for the Heritage Block Redevelopment. Update the cost estimate and outline a strategy for implementation. Opportunity #5 - Develop a Feasibility Plan for Borden Avenue Industrial Area Develop a feasibility study with local and regional partners to determine the best set of sustainable uses for the Borden Avenue Industrial Area and explore funding through the Empire State Development Block Program for implementation. Alternative uses for the site including its use as a food production, food processing and greater agricultural economic development hub. Opportunity #6 – Recapture Lost Corporate Lodging Demand and the Growing Leisure Market Increase the number of rooms and variety of overnight accommodations by attracting and supporting development teams to build a combination of basic and boutique B&BS, small hotels, and “flag” hotels. Investigate the feasibility of marketing the existing stock of Victorian and other architecturally-unique houses as a B&B cluster in the city of Norwich. Opportunity #7 – Support Entrepreneurship and Create New Opportunities for Business Development and Job Creation Pursue and seek funding for a center such as the “Innovation Space” concept proposed in the 2015 America’s Best Communities application by Commerce Chenango with other partners. This center would be designed to foster ideas, incubate start-up businesses, and improve career mobility. The Entrepreneur Makers Space in Ithaca is a successful example of a center that has already successfully taken two products to market. Opportunity #8 - Bring Recreation to the Waterfront Study
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Action Plan 2019
    Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Entitlement Communities Program Annual Action Plan Program Year 2019 Prepared by the City of Watertown Planning and Community Development Department 245 Washington Street Watertown, NY 13601 Adopted- May 20, 2019 Executive Summary AP-05 Executive Summary - 91.200(c), 91.220(b) 1. Introduction This document represents the City of Watertown’s Annual Action Plan for Program Year 2019 for the City's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. The City became an Entitlement Community under the CDBG Program for the first time in 2014 and developed a two-year Consolidated Plan to start the program. In 2016, the City developed its first five-year Consolidated Plan, which was written in conjunction with the North Country Home Consortium’s (NCHC) Consolidated Plan. The NCHC represents a three county area consisting of Jefferson, Lewis and St. Lawrence counties and receives annual funding from the HOME Investment Partnership program. This plan is the fourth Annual Action Plan that has been developed using the five-year Consolidated Plan that covers Program Years 2016- 2020. The City’s 2016-2020 Consolidated Plan goals include neighborhood stabilization and revitalization, affordable housing rehabilitation, homeownership assistance, fair housing education, homeless assistance, support of public services and job support and creation. The plan was developed through extensive public outreach and citizen participation that included two public meetings, a public hearing and individual outreach to numerous partner agencies identified in our Citizen Participation Plan. The City’s 2016 Annual Action Plan emphasized the City’s three primary goals of neighborhood stabilization and revitalization, affordable housing rehabilitation and homeownership assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Use Trails
    Multi-Use Trails Trail Name Terrain Length Surface Access Erwin Park, Route 12, Boonville; Dutch Hill Black River Feeder Canal Trail Flat 10 miles Stone Dust Road, Forestport New Hartford Street, New Hartford; Clinton Street, New Y ork Mills; Herkimer- Madison- Philip A. Rayhill Memorial T rail Flat 4 miles Asphalt Oneida BOCES, Middlesettlement Road, New Hartford; Clark Mills Road, Whitestown. Intersection of Routes 12B & 233; Kirkland; Chenango Canal Towpath Trail Flat 4 miles Stone Dust Dugway Road, Kirkland; Route 315, Boonville Blac k River Canal Intersection of Routes 12 & 12D, Boonville; Rolling 7 miles Grass Trail Pixley Falls State Park, Route 46, Boonville Adirondack Railroad Station, Thendara; Asphalt, Visitor Information Center, Old Forge; Big T OBIE T rail Flat & Rolling 12 miles Stone Dust Moose Road, Eagle Bay; Route 28, Inlet & Dirt (Hamilton County) Erie Canalway T rail Route 49, northeast of State Bridge; Erie Syracuse (Onondaga County) Flat 36 miles Stone Dust Canal Lock 21, Verona; Erie Canal Village, to Rome Rout e 49, Rome Intersection of Routes 69/365, Stanwix; Asphalt & River Street, Oriskany; Route 291, Marcy; Stanwix to Utic a Flat 13 miles Stone Dust Mohawk Street, Marcy; Barnes Ave, Utica; North Genesee Street, Utica MOVAC, Intersection of Routes 28 & 5S, Mohawk to German Flatts Flat 2 miles Asphalt Mohawk; Fort Herkimer Churc h, German Flatts Erie Canal Lock 17, Little Falls; Finks Basin Little Falls to Minden Flat 9 miles Stone Dust Road, Little Falls; Herkimer Home Historic (Montgomery County) Site, Route 169, Little Falls Erie Canalway Trail photos courtesy of HOCTS staff 6 Black River Feeder Canal Trail See Maps E and E-1 The approximately 10-mile Black River Feeder Canal trail is part of a New York State Canal Cor- poration improvement project to rehabilitate the towpath that follows the Black River Feeder Ca- nal.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Final Phase II Report
    REVISED DRAFT FINAL REPORT NNYYSS RROOUUTTEE 1122 CCOORRRRIIDDOORR SSTTUUDDYY PPHHAASSEE IIII Broome, Chenango, Madison & Oneida Counties Prepared For: New York State Department of Transportation October 2008 NYS Route 12 Corridor Study – Phase II DRAFT FINAL REPORT NYS ROUTE 12 CORRIDOR STUDY PHASE II October 2008 Prepared For : New York State Department of Transportation Region 2 Region 9 207 Genesee Street 44 Hawley Street Utica, New York 13501 Binghamton, New York 13901 In Conjunction With: Broome County Chenango County 47 Thomas Road 79 Rexford Street Binghamton, New York 13901 Norwich, New York 13815 Madison County Oneida County 139 North Court Street 321 Main Street Wampsville, New York 13163 Utica, NY 13501 And the Route 12 Task Force Prepared By : Barton & Loguidice, P.C. Wilbur Smith Associates 290 Elwood Davis Road 1301 Gervais Street Box 3107 P.O. Box 92 Syracuse, New York 13220 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 October 2008 - i - NYS Route 12 Corridor Study – Phase II TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Phase II Objectives 1.2 Description of Study Area 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 NY-12 Function 2.2 Analysis of Corridor Community Land Use 2.3 Analysis of Corridor – Base Maps 2.4 Traffic Data and Analysis 2.5 Phase I Report 2.6 Endangered and Threatened Species Inquiry 2.7 Origin-Destination Analysis 3. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 3.1 Public Meeting Schedule & Locations 3.2 Website 3.3 Distributed Materials 3.4 Comments Received 4. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION 4.1 Problem Identification 5. LONG RANGE ALTERNATIVES 5.1 Evaluation Criteria 5.2 Preliminary Alternatives Considered 1. I-88 Connector 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Chenango Canal History Review by Diane Van Slyke
    Chenango Canal Review, by Diane Van Slyke “Chenango” was the Indian word for bull-thistle. When the Chenango Valley was first settled, pioneers came from the east and were not prepared to face the rolling dense forest of hemlock, oak and pine and bull-thistles that covered the Southern Tier of New York State. The local Native Americans showed them how to chop and burn the tree stumps to clear the land and plant corn, beans and squash. Water was a means of transportation and survival. The fastest way to travel south was by raft and pole by Indian guide along the streams to the Susquehanna River. Traveling back east was by a narrow Indian path, which is today’s Rte. 20. The Erie Canal was built by 1825 and provided a super water-highway to the vast west, (Buffalo!). It connected the Great Lakes to the Hudson River to the port of New York City, making New York State known as the great Empire State. This developed New York City as an international trade center, and grew Buffalo from 200 settlers to 18,000 people by 1840. While all this was developing, it took 19 years for 9 leaders of the “Chenango Canal Committee” to get NYS legislature to pass a $1million bill approving construction of the Chenango Canal. This was important to the Chenango Valley, which included all of Madison County, to link the newly discovered coal mines in Pennsylvania to the Erie Canal. Construction started in 1834. Immigrant workers from Ireland and Scotland were lured here by a pay scale that was three times a common laborer’s wages: $11 per month.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form
    NFS Form 10-900-b / I^^^^Jj^^D S^firTl OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. 13 New Submission [~l Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing__________________________________________________ The Historic and Engineering Resources of the Chenango Canal B. Associated Historic Contexts______________________________________________________ The History of Engineering and Navigation of the Chenango Canal C. Form Prepared by name/title Anthony Opalka organization New York State Historic Preservation Office date__March 2005 street & number PQ Box 189 telephone 518-237-8643 city or town Waterford state New York .zip code_ 12188 Edited by: Mark Peckham D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional
    [Show full text]
  • Section 4: County Profile
    SECTION 4: COUNTY PROFILE SECTION 4: COUNTY PROFILE Broome County profile information is presented in the plan and analyzed to develop an understanding of a study area, including the economic, structural, and population assets at risk and the particular concerns that may be present related to hazards analyzed later in this plan (e.g., low lying areas prone to flooding or a high percentage of vulnerable persons in an area). This profile provides general information for Broome County (physical setting, population and demographics, general building stock, and land use and population trends) and critical facilities located within the County. GENERAL INFORMATION Broome County is a rural community located within the south-central part or “Southern Tier” of New York State. The Southern Tier is a geographical term that refers to the counties of New York State that lie west of the Catskill Mountains, along the northern border of Pennsylvania. Broome County lies directly west of Delaware County, 137 miles southwest of Albany and approximately 177 miles northwest of New York City. Broome County occupies approximately 715 square miles and has a population of approximately 199,031 (U.S. Census, 2011). Broome County is one of the 62 counties in New York State and is comprised of one city, sixteen towns, seven villages and many hamlets. The City of Binghamton is the County seat and is located at the confluence of the Susquehanna and Chenango Rivers. The City of Binghamton is part of the “Triple Cities,” which also includes the Villages of Endicott and Johnson City. With two Interstates and a major state route intersecting in the City of Binghamton, the area is the crossroads of the Southern Tier.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Transportation at Colgate University: an Analysis Of
    The History of Transportation at Colgate University: An Analysis of the Environmental, Economic, and Social Impacts By Marisa Chiodo, Kathryn Deaton, and Jonathan Morales Colgate University i Executive Summary This report looks at how students, faculty, administrators, and staff from Colgate University have traveled to and from campus and around campus over the last two hundred years. With this data, we consider how transportation practices have been sustainable considering the environmental, social, and economic pillars. We operationalized sustainability by looking at fuel emissions and landscape changes for the environmental pillar, money expenditures, feasibility, and affordability for the economic pillar, and accessibility, time efficiency, and passenger health for the social pillar. We focused on four modes of transportation from the early 1800s to the late 1900s. These include stage lines on country roads and turnpikes, packet boats on the Chenango Canal, railroads, and automobiles. Stage lines on country roads and turnpikes were the primary mode of transportation in the early 1800s when traveling around Hamilton, but the region first really began to change with the introduction of the Chenango Canal. While the Chenango Canal was ultimately a financial failure for New York State, it moved the Chenango Valley away from subsistence agriculture to a commercial economy. The Canal influenced Colgate by bringing students in from farther states, and had a small impact in increasing the student population. The Chenango Canal was abandoned because railroads provided a much more attractive alternative as a faster, more economically feasible transportation mode. In the mid-19th century, the first railroad was built through Hamilton, to be followed by two more in the upcoming years.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Law No. 2 of 1994
    163 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE Local Law Filing 162 WASHINGTON AVENUE, ALBANY, NY 12231 (Use this form to file a local law with the Secretary of State.) Text of law should be given as amended. Do not include matter being eliminatedrand do not use italics or underlining to indicate new matter. County '7)1 2 ; 5 5 L.. Citf of Chenango YJR.K9 oi 2 Local Law No. of the yC'reCla'!;*:1-1:92::19''-4:..;:'If:F'F':11{-3':E: A local law AUTWRIZING CHENANGO COUNTY APPLICATION AND PARTICIPATION IN AN ECONOMIC (Insert Title) DEVELOPMENT ZONE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 18-B OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW Be it enacted by cbgA4AB o County Board of Supervisors of the (Name of Legislative Body) County Chenango of as follows: The Planning and Economic Development Committee offered the;.1; following and moved its adoption: ADOPTED LOCAL LAW NO. 2 OF 1994 "A COUNTY LOCAL LAW AUTHORIZING CHENANGO COUNTY APPLICATION AND - PARTICIPATION IN AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ZONE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE' 18-B OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW". BE IT ENACTED by the Board of Supervisors of Chenango County, as follows: SECTION 1. INTENT: It is hereby declared the intent of this Board that the County participate in the Economic Development Zone Program as an essential element in assuring the long term economic stability and growth of Chenango County and promoting the general welfare of County residents. SECTION 2. APPLICATION AUTHORIZATION: The County of Chenango is authorized to and may prepare and submit together with the Town of Norwich, the Town of North Norwich, and the City of Norwich an application and/or co- application to the New York State Commissioner of Economic Development for designation of a certain area, the boundaries of which are set forth in Section 5 hereof, as an Economic Development Zone under Article 18-B of the General Municipal Law.
    [Show full text]
  • National Significance and Historical Context
    2.1 2 National Signifi cance and Historical Context NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OVERVIEW Th e Erie Canal is the most successful and infl uential human-built waterway and one of the most important works of civil engineering and construction in North America. It facilitated and shaped the course of settlement of the North- east, Midwest, and Great Plains, knit together the Atlantic Seaboard with the area west of the Appalachian Mountains, solidifi ed New York City’s place as the young nation’s principal seaport and commercial center, and became a central element forging the national identity. New York’s canal system, including the Erie Canal and its laterals – principally the Champlain, Oswego, and Cayuga-Seneca Canals – opened the interior of the continent. Built through the only low-level gap between the Appalachian Mountain chain and the Adirondack Mountains, the Erie Canal provided one of the principal routes for migration and an economical and reliable means for transporting agricultural products and manufactured goods between the American interior, the eastern seaboard, and Europe. Th e Erie Canal was a heroic feat of early 19th century engineering and construc- tion, and at 363 miles long, more than twice the length of any canal in Europe. Photo: It was without precedent in North America, designed and built through sparsely Postcard image of canal basin in Clinton Square, Syracuse, ca. 1905 settled territory by surveyors, engineers, contractors, and laborers who had to learn much of their craft on the job. Engineers and builders who got their start on New York’s canals went on to construct other canals, railroads, and public water supplies throughout the new nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Embankment Inspection & Maintenance Guide Book
    New York State Canal Corporation New York State Canal Corporation EMBANKMENT INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE GUIDE BOOK March 2021 NATIONAL FIRM. STRONG LOCAL CONNECTIONS. March 2021 NYSCC Embankment Inspection & Maintenance Guide Book TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Attachments .............................................................................................................................................................................. v Revision Summary Table .................................................................................................................................................................. vi General Limitations ............................................................................................................................................................................ vii Preface ................................................................................................................................................................................................... viii Glossary of Terms and acronyms .................................................................................................................................................. xi 1 Embankments Overview ...................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Overview and Manual Content .............................................................................................................................. 1-1
    [Show full text]
  • “LOW BRIDGE!” on the CHENANGO CANAL by Diane Van Slyke “Low
    “LOW BRIDGE!” ON THE CHENANGO CANAL by Diane Van Slyke “Low bridge! Everybody down! Low bridge, for we’re comin’ to a town!” That phrase is an excerpt from the famous song about the Erie Canal that applied to the Chenango Canal as well. The Chenango Canal, which opened in Oct. of 1836, was billed as the “best-built canal in the state!” It created a 97- mile waterway from Binghamton, NY in the southern tier, to a major port on the Erie Canal in Utica, NY. Numerous aqueducts and culverts, (and 116 locks), were built by hand from stone mined from either the Oriskany Falls or Norwich quarries. Over 200 bridges, built to allow the roads to span the water, had just enough clearance for the tops of the boats to pass under. The packet boats, proudly bearing names like**“The Madison of Solsville” (with Captain Bishop) or **“Fair Play” (with Captain Van Slyck), were manned by a minimum crew of 3: a driver, bowsman and steersman. The passengers were seated in chairs on the top deck. When the boat neared a town, the crew would sound “Low bridge!” and everybody would go to the lower deck to avoid being swept overboard by a bridge! * Nuel Stever, at the age of 76 in 1927, spoke of his colorful memories living on a Chenango Canal packet boat: “When I was five, I began driving canal boat teams on the towpath pulling the boats. Such work was common to boys of that age. I can remember driving a team hour after hour up the towpath for 20 miles when I was five.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 4- County Profile
    SECTION 4: COUNTY PROFILE SECTION 4 COUNTY PROFILE This profile provides general information for Chenango County’s physical setting, population and demographics, general building stock, land use and population trends, and critical facilities located within the county. Analyzing this information leads to an enhanced understanding of the study area. The economic, structural, and demographic contexts can be related to hazards analyzed later in this plan. 4.1 GENERAL INFORMATION Chenango is a word from Oneida tribal language name meaning “pleasant river flowing through the land of the bull thistle”. Chenango County was named after the Chenango River, which runs through the County (McFee, 2000). This largely rural and wooded county is located within the “Southern Tier Region” of New York State and was established on March 15, 1798, which included all of Madison County and Chenango County (Chenango County Visitors Guide, 2005, NYGenWeb, 2007). Today’s boundaries were established on March 21, 1806 (Sullivan, 1927). According to the American Community Survey, the 2018 estimated population for Chenango County is 48,348 (U.S. Census, 2018). Currently, Chenango County comprises 899 square miles and includes numerous state forests, rural landscapes, residential areas, business districts, over 103,000 acres of agricultural land, four rivers, various transportation systems, natural features, over 112,700 acres of forested land, and educational facilities (Draft Chenango Comprehensive Plan, 2013). This combination of natural and developed features lays the foundation for Chenango County’s vulnerability to natural hazards, both in terms of exposure to a hazard event and the potential impact of hazard events. Chenango County is comprised of 21 towns, 8 villages, and 1 city as described in the table below.
    [Show full text]