DOCSLIB.ORG

Calendar No. 482

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Calendar No. 482 Calendar No. 482 111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 2d Session SENATE 111–230 TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOP- MENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2011 JULY 23, 2010.—Ordered to be printed Filed under authority of the order of the Senate of January 6, 2009 Mrs. MURRAY, from the Committee on Appropriations, submitted the following REPORT [To accompany S. 3644] The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 3644) mak- ing appropriations for the Departments of Transportation and Housing and Urban Development, and related agencies for the fis- cal year ending September 30, 2011, and for other purposes, re- ports favorably thereon and recommends that the bill do pass. Amounts of new budget (obligational) authority for fiscal year 2011 Total of bill as reported to the Senate .................... $67,888,173,000 Amount of 2010 appropriations ............................... 67,898,457,000 Amount of 2011 budget estimate ............................ 68,836,693,000 Bill as recommended to Senate compared to— 2010 appropriations .......................................... ¥10,284,000 2011 budget estimate ........................................ ¥948,520,000 57–576 PDF C O N T E N T S Page Program, Project, and Activity ............................................................................... 3 Reprogramming Guidelines .................................................................................... 3 Congressional Budget Justifications ...................................................................... 3 Title I: Department of Transportation: Office of the Secretary ...................................................................................... 6 Federal Aviation Administration .................................................................... 27 Federal Highway Administration .................................................................... 47 Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ............................................... 62 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration .......................................... 73 Federal Railroad Administration .................................................................... 81 Federal Transit Administration ...................................................................... 89 Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation ....................................... 102 Maritime Administration ................................................................................. 104 Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ........................... 109 Research and Innovative Technology Administration ................................... 113 Bureau of Transportation Statistics ............................................................... 115 Office of Inspector General .............................................................................. 116 Surface Transportation Board ......................................................................... 118 General Provisions—Department of Transportation ..................................... 119 Title II: Department of Housing and Urban Development: Executive Direction .......................................................................................... 122 Administration, Operations, and Management .............................................. 124 Personnel Compensation and Benefits ........................................................... 125 Public and Indian Housing .............................................................................. 132 Community Planning and Development ......................................................... 145 Housing Programs ............................................................................................ 163 Federal Housing Administration ..................................................................... 170 Government National Mortgage Association .................................................. 173 Policy Development and Research .................................................................. 174 Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity ............................................................. 175 Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control ...................................... 177 Management and Administration ................................................................... 178 Administrative Provisions ................................................................................ 182 Title III: Independent Agencies: Access Board ..................................................................................................... 185 Federal Maritime Commission ........................................................................ 186 National Railroad Passenger Corporation: Office of the Inspector General .......................................................................................................... 187 National Transportation Safety Board ........................................................... 189 Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation ....................................................... 190 United States Interagency Council on Homelessness ................................... 192 Title IV: General Provisions—This Act .................................................................. 195 Compliance With Paragraph 7, Rule XVI, of the Standing Rules of the Sen- ate .......................................................................................................................... 197 Compliance With Paragraph 7(c), Rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules of the Senate ................................................................................................................... 198 Compliance With Paragraph 12, Rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate ................................................................................................................... 199 Budgetary Impact of Bill ......................................................................................... 207 Disclosure of Congressionally Directed Spending Items ...................................... 207 Comparative Statement of Budget Authority ........................................................ 240 (2) PROGRAM, PROJECT, AND ACTIVITY During fiscal year 2011, for the purposes of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Public Law 99–177), as amended, with respect to appropriations contained in the accom- panying bill, the terms ‘‘program, project, and activity’’ [PPA] shall mean any item for which a dollar amount is contained in appro- priations acts (including joint resolutions providing continuing ap- propriations) or accompanying reports of the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations, or accompanying conference reports and joint explanatory statements of the committee of conference. This definition shall apply to all programs for which new budget (obligational) authority is provided, as well as to discretionary grants and discretionary grant allocations made through either bill or report language. In addition, the percentage reductions made pursuant to a sequestration order to funds appropriated for facili- ties and equipment, Federal Aviation Administration, shall be ap- plied equally to each budget item that is listed under said account in the budget justifications submitted to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations as modified by subsequent appro- priations acts and accompanying committee reports, conference re- ports, or joint explanatory statements of the committee of con- ference. REPROGRAMMING GUIDELINES The Committee includes a provision (sec. 405) establishing the authority by which funding available to the agencies funded by this act may be reprogrammed for other purposes. The provision specifi- cally requires the advanced approval of the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations of any proposal to reprogram funds that: (1) creates a new program; (2) eliminates a program, project, or activity [PPA]; (3) increases funds or personnel for any PPA for which funds have been denied or restricted by the Congress; (4) proposes to redirect funds that were directed in such reports for a specific activity to a different purpose; (5) augments an existing PPA in excess of $5,000,000 or 10 percent, whichever is less; (6) re- duces an existing PPA by $5,000,000 or 10 percent, whichever is less; or (7) creates, reorganizes, or restructures offices different from the congressional budget justifications or the table at the end of the Committee report, whichever is more detailed. The Committee retains the requirement that each agency submit an operating plan to the House and Senate Committees on Appro- priations not later than 60 days after enactment of this act to es- tablish the baseline for application of reprogramming and transfer authorities provided in this act. Specifically, each agency should provide a table for each appropriation with columns displaying the budget request; adjustments made by Congress; adjustments for re- scissions, if appropriate; and the fiscal year enacted level. The table (3) 4 shall delineate the appropriation both by object class and by PPA. The report must also identify items of special congressional inter- est. The Committee expects the agencies and bureaus to submit re- programming requests in a timely manner and to provide a thor- ough explanation of the proposed reallocations, including a detailed justification of increases and reductions and the specific impact the proposed changes will have on the budget request for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Action Plan 2019
    Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Entitlement Communities Program Annual Action Plan Program Year 2019 Prepared by the City of Watertown Planning and Community Development Department 245 Washington Street Watertown, NY 13601 Adopted- May 20, 2019 Executive Summary AP-05 Executive Summary - 91.200(c), 91.220(b) 1. Introduction This document represents the City of Watertown’s Annual Action Plan for Program Year 2019 for the City's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. The City became an Entitlement Community under the CDBG Program for the first time in 2014 and developed a two-year Consolidated Plan to start the program. In 2016, the City developed its first five-year Consolidated Plan, which was written in conjunction with the North Country Home Consortium’s (NCHC) Consolidated Plan. The NCHC represents a three county area consisting of Jefferson, Lewis and St. Lawrence counties and receives annual funding from the HOME Investment Partnership program. This plan is the fourth Annual Action Plan that has been developed using the five-year Consolidated Plan that covers Program Years 2016- 2020. The City’s 2016-2020 Consolidated Plan goals include neighborhood stabilization and revitalization, affordable housing rehabilitation, homeownership assistance, fair housing education, homeless assistance, support of public services and job support and creation. The plan was developed through extensive public outreach and citizen participation that included two public meetings, a public hearing and individual outreach to numerous partner agencies identified in our Citizen Participation Plan. The City’s 2016 Annual Action Plan emphasized the City’s three primary goals of neighborhood stabilization and revitalization, affordable housing rehabilitation and homeownership assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Final Phase II Report
    REVISED DRAFT FINAL REPORT NNYYSS RROOUUTTEE 1122 CCOORRRRIIDDOORR SSTTUUDDYY PPHHAASSEE IIII Broome, Chenango, Madison & Oneida Counties Prepared For: New York State Department of Transportation October 2008 NYS Route 12 Corridor Study – Phase II DRAFT FINAL REPORT NYS ROUTE 12 CORRIDOR STUDY PHASE II October 2008 Prepared For : New York State Department of Transportation Region 2 Region 9 207 Genesee Street 44 Hawley Street Utica, New York 13501 Binghamton, New York 13901 In Conjunction With: Broome County Chenango County 47 Thomas Road 79 Rexford Street Binghamton, New York 13901 Norwich, New York 13815 Madison County Oneida County 139 North Court Street 321 Main Street Wampsville, New York 13163 Utica, NY 13501 And the Route 12 Task Force Prepared By : Barton & Loguidice, P.C. Wilbur Smith Associates 290 Elwood Davis Road 1301 Gervais Street Box 3107 P.O. Box 92 Syracuse, New York 13220 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 October 2008 - i - NYS Route 12 Corridor Study – Phase II TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Phase II Objectives 1.2 Description of Study Area 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 NY-12 Function 2.2 Analysis of Corridor Community Land Use 2.3 Analysis of Corridor – Base Maps 2.4 Traffic Data and Analysis 2.5 Phase I Report 2.6 Endangered and Threatened Species Inquiry 2.7 Origin-Destination Analysis 3. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 3.1 Public Meeting Schedule & Locations 3.2 Website 3.3 Distributed Materials 3.4 Comments Received 4. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION 4.1 Problem Identification 5. LONG RANGE ALTERNATIVES 5.1 Evaluation Criteria 5.2 Preliminary Alternatives Considered 1. I-88 Connector 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Reno – Stead Airport
    Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority FY 2017-18 ANNUAL BUDGET Table of Contents SECTION 1 – Introduction and Summary Airport System Overview. ......................................................................................... 1-2 National and Regional Economic Outlook. ............................................................. 2-13 Air Service Market Update. ................................................................................... 13-17 Air Cargo Update. .................................................................................................. 17-19 Operating Environment. ........................................................................................ 19-29 Budget Process. ..................................................................................................... 29-30 Revenue Bond Resolution .......................................................................................... 30 Planning for the Future .......................................................................................... 30-32 Budget Document Structure ....................................................................................... 32 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 32-33 Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................... 33 Distinguished Budget Presentation Award ................................................................. 34 SECTION 2 – Executive Summary
    [Show full text]
  • Confidential Position Specification Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority
    CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT Confidential Position Specification Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority President & Chief Executive Officer March 2020 CONFIDENTIAL POSITION SPECIFICATION Position President & Chief Executive Officer Company Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority Location Reno, Nevada Reporting Relationship Reports to the Board of Trustees Website https://www.renoairport.com COMPANY BACKGROUND The Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority (“the Authority”, “RTAA”, or “the airport”) is the owner and operator of Reno-Tahoe International Airport (RNO) and Reno-Stead Airport (RTS), a general aviation facility. The RTAA is an independent entity that is not part of any other unit of local government and does not use local property or sales tax revenue to fund its operation. The Authority is governed by a nine-member Board of Trustees, operates as a business, and receives no local tax dollars. The Reno-Tahoe International Airport is a very important asset to the region, with the 4.4 million passengers going through the airport in 2019 (66th busiest in the United States), bringing $3.2 billion in economic impact to the region. The Authority employs approximately 280 direct airport staff and over 2,400 other staff work on airport premises for various tenants and other companies. RNO is located just five minutes from downtown Reno, therefore, it is literally and figuratively at the heart of the community and only 40 minutes from some of the finest ski resorts and outdoor recreation in the world. The airport makes the all-important first and last impression on passengers coming and going from the region. The Airport truly plays a vital role for the hotel casinos, ski resorts, golf courses, the University of Nevada, and a growing restaurant scene and high-tech business district.
    [Show full text]
  • TEMPLATE for REGIONAL PLAN ANNUAL REPORTING (Reporting Period: January – December, 2019)
    TEMPLATE FOR REGIONAL PLAN ANNUAL REPORTING (Reporting Period: January – December, 2019) The following items are general themes found in the 2019 Truckee Meadows Regional Plan, adopted on October 10, 2019. The Plan can be found on our website at tmrpa.org by clicking the “Regional Plan” link on the homepage. If you need any assistance accessing or acquiring the 2019 Truckee Meadows Regional Plan), please contact us at 775-321-8385. Please address the following topics as they pertain to the entity that the Annual Report is being provided for: A. POPULATION GROWTH (PG) Chapter 3 of the Regional Plan, Section 1: Population Growth includes policies that address population forecasting, the use of TMRPA forecasts by local jurisdictions and affected entities for planning, and strategies by local government jurisdictions to support affordable housing. Please provide information regarding how your local government or entity has affected, impacted, or implemented the policies found in Chapter 3, Section 1 of the Regional Plan (policies PG 1 – 4). The Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority (RTAA) owns and operates the Reno-Tahoe International Airport (RNO) and the Reno-Stead Airport (RTS). RTAA is a quasi-municipal corporation that was created by the Nevada State Legislature and began operation on July 1, 1978. The RTAA is an independent entity that is not part of any other unit of local government and does not use local property or sales tax revenue to fund its operation. The mission of the RTAA is to maintain and grow aviation services and facilities, as part of the global transportation system, to transport people and goods to benefit the region, while also being financially self-sufficient.
    [Show full text]
  • Panoctober 2008
    Police Aviation News 150 October 2008 ©Police Aviation Research Number 150 October 2008 IPAR Police Aviation News October 2008 2 PAN – POLICE AVIATION NEWS is published monthly by INTERNATIONAL POLICE AVIATION RESEARCH 7 Windmill Close, Honey Lane, Waltham Abbey, Essex EN9 3BQ UK Main: +44 1992 714162 Cell: +44 7778 296650 Skype: Bryn.Elliott Bryn Elliott E-mail: [email protected] Bob Crowe www.bobcroweaircraft.com Digital Downlink www.bms-inc.com L3 Wescam www.wescam.com Innovative Downlink Solutions www.mrcsecurity.com Power in a box www.powervamp.com Turning the blades www.turbomeca.com Airborne Law Enforcement Association www.alea.org European Law Enforcement Association www.pacenet.info Sindacato Personale Aeronavigante Della Polizia www.uppolizia.it EDITORIAL Police Aviation News 150. I guess no-one including myself was ever ex- pecting that and yet here we are 150 monthly issues and over 12 years down the road [and that discounts the special issues], millions of words and a handful of typewriters, printers and computers later. And I hope that it has been a worthwhile service for a good many people. It has been a journey where many, many friends have been made and a few of the opposite persuasion encountered—they of course will not be reading these words, or will they! The experience has been a real pleasure but although I somehow doubt that any of us will be around for another 150 I will not be giving up soon! Bryn Elliott LAW ENFORCEMENT AUSTRALIA VICTORIA: The future of the airport at Essendon, currently the home for police, fire and air ambulance aircraft is in danger.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Station Program and Planning Guidelines 1
    Amtrak Station Program and Planning Guidelines 1. Overview 5 6. Site 55 1.1 Background 5 6.1 Introduction 55 1.2 Introduction 5 6.2 Multi-modal Planning 56 1.3 Contents of the Guidelines 6 6.3 Context 57 1.4 Philosophy, Goals and Objectives 7 6.4 Station/Platform Confi gurations 61 1.5 Governing Principles 8 6.5 Track and Platform Planning 65 6.6 Vehicular Circulation 66 6.7 Bicycle Parking 66 2. Process 11 6.8 Parking 67 2.1 Introduction 11 6.9 Amtrak Functional Requirements 68 2.2 Stakeholder Coordination 12 6.10 Information Systems and Way Finding 69 2.3 Concept Development 13 6.11 Safety and Security 70 2.4 Funding 14 6.12 Sustainable Design 71 2.5 Real Estate Transactional Documents 14 6.13 Universal Design 72 2.6 Basis of Design 15 2.7 Construction Documents 16 2.8 Project Delivery methods 17 7. Station 73 2.9 Commissioning 18 7.1 Introduction 73 2.10 Station Opening 18 7.2 Architectural Overview 74 7.3 Information Systems and Way Finding 75 7.4 Passenger Information Display System (PIDS) 77 3. Amtrak System 19 7.5 Safety and Security 78 3.1 Introduction 19 7.6 Sustainable Design 79 3.2 Service Types 20 7.7 Accessibility 80 3.3 Equipment 23 3.4 Operations 26 8. Platform 81 8.1 Introduction 81 4. Station Categories 27 8.2 Platform Types 83 4.1 Introduction 27 8.3 Platform-Track Relationships 84 4.2 Summary of Characteristics 28 8.4 Connection to the station 85 4.3 Location and Geography 29 8.5 Platform Length 87 4.4 Category 1 Large stations 30 8.6 Platform Width 88 4.5 Category 2 Medium Stations 31 8.7 Platform Height 89 4.6 Category 3 Caretaker Stations 32 8.8 Additional Dimensions and Clearances 90 4.7 Category 4 Shelter Stations 33 8.9 Safety and Security 91 4.8 Thruway Bus Service 34 8.10 Accessibility 92 8.11 Snow Melting Systems 93 5.
    [Show full text]
  • EMPIRE BUILDER Train Time Schedule & Line Route
    EMPIRE BUILDER train time schedule & line map Empire Builder View In Website Mode The train line Empire Builder has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Chicago Union Station Amtrak: 6:40 PM (2) Seattle King Street Station Amtrak: 2:15 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest EMPIRE BUILDER train station near you and ƒnd out when is the next EMPIRE BUILDER train arriving. Direction: Chicago Union Station Amtrak EMPIRE BUILDER train Time Schedule 40 stops Chicago Union Station Amtrak Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 6:40 PM Monday 6:40 PM Seattle King Street Station Amtrak 303 South Jackson Street, Seattle Tuesday 6:40 PM Edmonds Amtrak Wednesday 6:40 PM 190 Sunset Avenue South, Edmonds Thursday 6:40 PM Everett Amtrak Friday 6:40 PM 3201 Smith Ave, Everett Saturday 6:40 PM Leavenworth Icicle Station Amtrak 11645 North Rd, Chelan County Wenatchee Columbia Station Amtrak 1 E Kittitas St, Wenatchee EMPIRE BUILDER train Info Direction: Chicago Union Station Amtrak Ephrata Amtrak Stops: 40 114 1st Ave Nw, Ephrata Trip Duration: 2715 min Line Summary: Seattle King Street Station Amtrak, Spokane Amtrak Edmonds Amtrak, Everett Amtrak, Leavenworth 221 W 1st Ave, Spokane Icicle Station Amtrak, Wenatchee Columbia Station Amtrak, Ephrata Amtrak, Spokane Amtrak, Sandpoint Amtrak Sandpoint Amtrak, Libby Amtrak, Whiteƒsh Amtrak, West Glacier Amtrak, Essex Amtrak, Browning Libby Amtrak Amtrak, Cut Bank Amtrak, Shelby Amtrak, Havre 100 Mineral Ave, Lincoln County Amtrak, Malta Amtrak, Glasgow Amtrak, Wolf Point Amtrak, Williston Amtrak, Stanley Amtrak, Minot Whiteƒsh Amtrak Amtrak, Rugby Amtrak, Devils Lake Amtrak, Grand 500 Depot St, Flathead County Forks Amtrak, Fargo Amtrak, Detroit Lakes Amtrak, Staples Amtrak, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Law No. 2 of 1994
    163 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE Local Law Filing 162 WASHINGTON AVENUE, ALBANY, NY 12231 (Use this form to file a local law with the Secretary of State.) Text of law should be given as amended. Do not include matter being eliminatedrand do not use italics or underlining to indicate new matter. County '7)1 2 ; 5 5 L.. Citf of Chenango YJR.K9 oi 2 Local Law No. of the yC'reCla'!;*:1-1:92::19''-4:..;:'If:F'F':11{-3':E: A local law AUTWRIZING CHENANGO COUNTY APPLICATION AND PARTICIPATION IN AN ECONOMIC (Insert Title) DEVELOPMENT ZONE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 18-B OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW Be it enacted by cbgA4AB o County Board of Supervisors of the (Name of Legislative Body) County Chenango of as follows: The Planning and Economic Development Committee offered the;.1; following and moved its adoption: ADOPTED LOCAL LAW NO. 2 OF 1994 "A COUNTY LOCAL LAW AUTHORIZING CHENANGO COUNTY APPLICATION AND - PARTICIPATION IN AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ZONE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE' 18-B OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW". BE IT ENACTED by the Board of Supervisors of Chenango County, as follows: SECTION 1. INTENT: It is hereby declared the intent of this Board that the County participate in the Economic Development Zone Program as an essential element in assuring the long term economic stability and growth of Chenango County and promoting the general welfare of County residents. SECTION 2. APPLICATION AUTHORIZATION: The County of Chenango is authorized to and may prepare and submit together with the Town of Norwich, the Town of North Norwich, and the City of Norwich an application and/or co- application to the New York State Commissioner of Economic Development for designation of a certain area, the boundaries of which are set forth in Section 5 hereof, as an Economic Development Zone under Article 18-B of the General Municipal Law.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA Regional Planning Commission Wednesday, May 9, 2018 6:00 P.M
    AGENDA Regional Planning Commission Wednesday, May 9, 2018 6:00 p.m. Washoe County Commission Chambers 1001 East Ninth Street, Reno, Nevada 1. Roll Call* 2. Salute to the Flag* 3. [For possible action] Approval of the Agenda 4. Approval of the Minutes A. [For possible action] March 14, 2018 Regional Planning Commission (RPC) Meeting [ Pg. 1 – 4 ] B. [For possible action] March 26, 2018 RPC Meeting [ Pg. 5 – 8 ] 5. Public Comment* 6. Consent Agenda A. [For possible action] – Consideration and possible acceptance of individual annual reports submitted by local governments and affected entities pursuant to subsection 1 of NRS 278.0286 [ Pg. 9 – 104 ] 7. Business of the day A. [For possible action] PUBLIC HEARING – Regional Plan Amendment (RPA18-001) – Consideration and possible action to adopt RPC Resolution 18-01 providing a recommendation to the Regional Planning Governing Board (RPGB) regarding a mapping amendment to Maps 9-11 of the 2012 Truckee Meadows Regional Plan adding a new regional utility site and a new regional utility corridor in the East Truckee River Canyon at 2505 State Route 447 [ Pg. 105 – 112 ] B. [For possible action] PUBLIC HEARING – Regional Plan Conformance Review – Project of Regional Significance, Dodge Flat Solar (CR18-004) – A project of regional significance (PRS) for the request to construct a new 200 Megawatt (MW) solar energy sub-station, ancillary facilities including two 90-foot private communication antennas and to connect the project to an existing 345 kilovolt (kV) transmission line in the East Truckee
    [Show full text]
  • Closing Military Bases: National Disaster Or National Opportunity?
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 1994 Closing Military Bases: National Disaster or National Opportunity? Brooke Danielle Wortham University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Wortham, Brooke Danielle, "Closing Military Bases: National Disaster or National Opportunity?" (1994). Theses (Historic Preservation). 477. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/477 Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Wortham, Brooke Danielle. (1994). Closing Military Bases: National Disaster or National Opportunity?. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/477 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Closing Military Bases: National Disaster or National Opportunity? Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Wortham, Brooke Danielle. (1994). Closing Military Bases: National Disaster or National Opportunity?. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/477
    [Show full text]
  • Febuary-March
    Washington Rail News February /march 200 999 www.AllAboardWashington.org Publication of All Aboard Washington A Not ---for-forforfor----profitprofit Consumer Organization “Moving forward...On Rail ."."." established with the relaunch of the Amtrak ridership bucks national trends with Builder in August 2005 and the public strong growth in 2008; Northwest train capacity continues to show its support by riding this train. strained even as new stops and improved stations It’s rather amazing that Coast Star- encourage continuing ridership increases light ridership increased in 2008, con - Nationwide, Amtrak ridership was 760,323, up 12.8% over sidering the route was partially or com - soared 11.1% in fiscal year 2008 2007; revenue was $20,999,003, pletely annulled between Jan. 20 and (ending Sept. 30) over 2007, setting a up 15.8%. Total Northwest Corri- May 6 because of the massive land - new all time record. This increase dor ridership (including Coast slide t hat wiped out the Union Pacific comes at the same time auto and air Starlight passengers riding solely mainline in the Oregon Cascades. The travel have plunged. And even the in the corridor) was 847,563, up Starlight received upgraded amenities substantial drop in gas prices since last 15.4% over 2007. and services this past summer and on- July has had little impact on the pub- • Empire Builder: FY 2008 time performance has improved mar - lic’s reductions in driving, though the ridership was 554,266, up 9.8% kedly from 2007. This improvement led over 2007; revenue was Amtrak to announce that effective Feb.
    [Show full text]