Calendar No. 482
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Annual Action Plan 2019
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Entitlement Communities Program Annual Action Plan Program Year 2019 Prepared by the City of Watertown Planning and Community Development Department 245 Washington Street Watertown, NY 13601 Adopted- May 20, 2019 Executive Summary AP-05 Executive Summary - 91.200(c), 91.220(b) 1. Introduction This document represents the City of Watertown’s Annual Action Plan for Program Year 2019 for the City's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. The City became an Entitlement Community under the CDBG Program for the first time in 2014 and developed a two-year Consolidated Plan to start the program. In 2016, the City developed its first five-year Consolidated Plan, which was written in conjunction with the North Country Home Consortium’s (NCHC) Consolidated Plan. The NCHC represents a three county area consisting of Jefferson, Lewis and St. Lawrence counties and receives annual funding from the HOME Investment Partnership program. This plan is the fourth Annual Action Plan that has been developed using the five-year Consolidated Plan that covers Program Years 2016- 2020. The City’s 2016-2020 Consolidated Plan goals include neighborhood stabilization and revitalization, affordable housing rehabilitation, homeownership assistance, fair housing education, homeless assistance, support of public services and job support and creation. The plan was developed through extensive public outreach and citizen participation that included two public meetings, a public hearing and individual outreach to numerous partner agencies identified in our Citizen Participation Plan. The City’s 2016 Annual Action Plan emphasized the City’s three primary goals of neighborhood stabilization and revitalization, affordable housing rehabilitation and homeownership assistance. -
Draft Final Phase II Report
REVISED DRAFT FINAL REPORT NNYYSS RROOUUTTEE 1122 CCOORRRRIIDDOORR SSTTUUDDYY PPHHAASSEE IIII Broome, Chenango, Madison & Oneida Counties Prepared For: New York State Department of Transportation October 2008 NYS Route 12 Corridor Study – Phase II DRAFT FINAL REPORT NYS ROUTE 12 CORRIDOR STUDY PHASE II October 2008 Prepared For : New York State Department of Transportation Region 2 Region 9 207 Genesee Street 44 Hawley Street Utica, New York 13501 Binghamton, New York 13901 In Conjunction With: Broome County Chenango County 47 Thomas Road 79 Rexford Street Binghamton, New York 13901 Norwich, New York 13815 Madison County Oneida County 139 North Court Street 321 Main Street Wampsville, New York 13163 Utica, NY 13501 And the Route 12 Task Force Prepared By : Barton & Loguidice, P.C. Wilbur Smith Associates 290 Elwood Davis Road 1301 Gervais Street Box 3107 P.O. Box 92 Syracuse, New York 13220 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 October 2008 - i - NYS Route 12 Corridor Study – Phase II TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Phase II Objectives 1.2 Description of Study Area 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 NY-12 Function 2.2 Analysis of Corridor Community Land Use 2.3 Analysis of Corridor – Base Maps 2.4 Traffic Data and Analysis 2.5 Phase I Report 2.6 Endangered and Threatened Species Inquiry 2.7 Origin-Destination Analysis 3. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 3.1 Public Meeting Schedule & Locations 3.2 Website 3.3 Distributed Materials 3.4 Comments Received 4. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION 4.1 Problem Identification 5. LONG RANGE ALTERNATIVES 5.1 Evaluation Criteria 5.2 Preliminary Alternatives Considered 1. I-88 Connector 2. -
Reno – Stead Airport
Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority FY 2017-18 ANNUAL BUDGET Table of Contents SECTION 1 – Introduction and Summary Airport System Overview. ......................................................................................... 1-2 National and Regional Economic Outlook. ............................................................. 2-13 Air Service Market Update. ................................................................................... 13-17 Air Cargo Update. .................................................................................................. 17-19 Operating Environment. ........................................................................................ 19-29 Budget Process. ..................................................................................................... 29-30 Revenue Bond Resolution .......................................................................................... 30 Planning for the Future .......................................................................................... 30-32 Budget Document Structure ....................................................................................... 32 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 32-33 Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................... 33 Distinguished Budget Presentation Award ................................................................. 34 SECTION 2 – Executive Summary -
Confidential Position Specification Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority
CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT Confidential Position Specification Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority President & Chief Executive Officer March 2020 CONFIDENTIAL POSITION SPECIFICATION Position President & Chief Executive Officer Company Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority Location Reno, Nevada Reporting Relationship Reports to the Board of Trustees Website https://www.renoairport.com COMPANY BACKGROUND The Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority (“the Authority”, “RTAA”, or “the airport”) is the owner and operator of Reno-Tahoe International Airport (RNO) and Reno-Stead Airport (RTS), a general aviation facility. The RTAA is an independent entity that is not part of any other unit of local government and does not use local property or sales tax revenue to fund its operation. The Authority is governed by a nine-member Board of Trustees, operates as a business, and receives no local tax dollars. The Reno-Tahoe International Airport is a very important asset to the region, with the 4.4 million passengers going through the airport in 2019 (66th busiest in the United States), bringing $3.2 billion in economic impact to the region. The Authority employs approximately 280 direct airport staff and over 2,400 other staff work on airport premises for various tenants and other companies. RNO is located just five minutes from downtown Reno, therefore, it is literally and figuratively at the heart of the community and only 40 minutes from some of the finest ski resorts and outdoor recreation in the world. The airport makes the all-important first and last impression on passengers coming and going from the region. The Airport truly plays a vital role for the hotel casinos, ski resorts, golf courses, the University of Nevada, and a growing restaurant scene and high-tech business district. -
TEMPLATE for REGIONAL PLAN ANNUAL REPORTING (Reporting Period: January – December, 2019)
TEMPLATE FOR REGIONAL PLAN ANNUAL REPORTING (Reporting Period: January – December, 2019) The following items are general themes found in the 2019 Truckee Meadows Regional Plan, adopted on October 10, 2019. The Plan can be found on our website at tmrpa.org by clicking the “Regional Plan” link on the homepage. If you need any assistance accessing or acquiring the 2019 Truckee Meadows Regional Plan), please contact us at 775-321-8385. Please address the following topics as they pertain to the entity that the Annual Report is being provided for: A. POPULATION GROWTH (PG) Chapter 3 of the Regional Plan, Section 1: Population Growth includes policies that address population forecasting, the use of TMRPA forecasts by local jurisdictions and affected entities for planning, and strategies by local government jurisdictions to support affordable housing. Please provide information regarding how your local government or entity has affected, impacted, or implemented the policies found in Chapter 3, Section 1 of the Regional Plan (policies PG 1 – 4). The Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority (RTAA) owns and operates the Reno-Tahoe International Airport (RNO) and the Reno-Stead Airport (RTS). RTAA is a quasi-municipal corporation that was created by the Nevada State Legislature and began operation on July 1, 1978. The RTAA is an independent entity that is not part of any other unit of local government and does not use local property or sales tax revenue to fund its operation. The mission of the RTAA is to maintain and grow aviation services and facilities, as part of the global transportation system, to transport people and goods to benefit the region, while also being financially self-sufficient. -
Panoctober 2008
Police Aviation News 150 October 2008 ©Police Aviation Research Number 150 October 2008 IPAR Police Aviation News October 2008 2 PAN – POLICE AVIATION NEWS is published monthly by INTERNATIONAL POLICE AVIATION RESEARCH 7 Windmill Close, Honey Lane, Waltham Abbey, Essex EN9 3BQ UK Main: +44 1992 714162 Cell: +44 7778 296650 Skype: Bryn.Elliott Bryn Elliott E-mail: [email protected] Bob Crowe www.bobcroweaircraft.com Digital Downlink www.bms-inc.com L3 Wescam www.wescam.com Innovative Downlink Solutions www.mrcsecurity.com Power in a box www.powervamp.com Turning the blades www.turbomeca.com Airborne Law Enforcement Association www.alea.org European Law Enforcement Association www.pacenet.info Sindacato Personale Aeronavigante Della Polizia www.uppolizia.it EDITORIAL Police Aviation News 150. I guess no-one including myself was ever ex- pecting that and yet here we are 150 monthly issues and over 12 years down the road [and that discounts the special issues], millions of words and a handful of typewriters, printers and computers later. And I hope that it has been a worthwhile service for a good many people. It has been a journey where many, many friends have been made and a few of the opposite persuasion encountered—they of course will not be reading these words, or will they! The experience has been a real pleasure but although I somehow doubt that any of us will be around for another 150 I will not be giving up soon! Bryn Elliott LAW ENFORCEMENT AUSTRALIA VICTORIA: The future of the airport at Essendon, currently the home for police, fire and air ambulance aircraft is in danger. -
Amtrak Station Program and Planning Guidelines 1
Amtrak Station Program and Planning Guidelines 1. Overview 5 6. Site 55 1.1 Background 5 6.1 Introduction 55 1.2 Introduction 5 6.2 Multi-modal Planning 56 1.3 Contents of the Guidelines 6 6.3 Context 57 1.4 Philosophy, Goals and Objectives 7 6.4 Station/Platform Confi gurations 61 1.5 Governing Principles 8 6.5 Track and Platform Planning 65 6.6 Vehicular Circulation 66 6.7 Bicycle Parking 66 2. Process 11 6.8 Parking 67 2.1 Introduction 11 6.9 Amtrak Functional Requirements 68 2.2 Stakeholder Coordination 12 6.10 Information Systems and Way Finding 69 2.3 Concept Development 13 6.11 Safety and Security 70 2.4 Funding 14 6.12 Sustainable Design 71 2.5 Real Estate Transactional Documents 14 6.13 Universal Design 72 2.6 Basis of Design 15 2.7 Construction Documents 16 2.8 Project Delivery methods 17 7. Station 73 2.9 Commissioning 18 7.1 Introduction 73 2.10 Station Opening 18 7.2 Architectural Overview 74 7.3 Information Systems and Way Finding 75 7.4 Passenger Information Display System (PIDS) 77 3. Amtrak System 19 7.5 Safety and Security 78 3.1 Introduction 19 7.6 Sustainable Design 79 3.2 Service Types 20 7.7 Accessibility 80 3.3 Equipment 23 3.4 Operations 26 8. Platform 81 8.1 Introduction 81 4. Station Categories 27 8.2 Platform Types 83 4.1 Introduction 27 8.3 Platform-Track Relationships 84 4.2 Summary of Characteristics 28 8.4 Connection to the station 85 4.3 Location and Geography 29 8.5 Platform Length 87 4.4 Category 1 Large stations 30 8.6 Platform Width 88 4.5 Category 2 Medium Stations 31 8.7 Platform Height 89 4.6 Category 3 Caretaker Stations 32 8.8 Additional Dimensions and Clearances 90 4.7 Category 4 Shelter Stations 33 8.9 Safety and Security 91 4.8 Thruway Bus Service 34 8.10 Accessibility 92 8.11 Snow Melting Systems 93 5. -
EMPIRE BUILDER Train Time Schedule & Line Route
EMPIRE BUILDER train time schedule & line map Empire Builder View In Website Mode The train line Empire Builder has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Chicago Union Station Amtrak: 6:40 PM (2) Seattle King Street Station Amtrak: 2:15 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest EMPIRE BUILDER train station near you and ƒnd out when is the next EMPIRE BUILDER train arriving. Direction: Chicago Union Station Amtrak EMPIRE BUILDER train Time Schedule 40 stops Chicago Union Station Amtrak Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 6:40 PM Monday 6:40 PM Seattle King Street Station Amtrak 303 South Jackson Street, Seattle Tuesday 6:40 PM Edmonds Amtrak Wednesday 6:40 PM 190 Sunset Avenue South, Edmonds Thursday 6:40 PM Everett Amtrak Friday 6:40 PM 3201 Smith Ave, Everett Saturday 6:40 PM Leavenworth Icicle Station Amtrak 11645 North Rd, Chelan County Wenatchee Columbia Station Amtrak 1 E Kittitas St, Wenatchee EMPIRE BUILDER train Info Direction: Chicago Union Station Amtrak Ephrata Amtrak Stops: 40 114 1st Ave Nw, Ephrata Trip Duration: 2715 min Line Summary: Seattle King Street Station Amtrak, Spokane Amtrak Edmonds Amtrak, Everett Amtrak, Leavenworth 221 W 1st Ave, Spokane Icicle Station Amtrak, Wenatchee Columbia Station Amtrak, Ephrata Amtrak, Spokane Amtrak, Sandpoint Amtrak Sandpoint Amtrak, Libby Amtrak, Whiteƒsh Amtrak, West Glacier Amtrak, Essex Amtrak, Browning Libby Amtrak Amtrak, Cut Bank Amtrak, Shelby Amtrak, Havre 100 Mineral Ave, Lincoln County Amtrak, Malta Amtrak, Glasgow Amtrak, Wolf Point Amtrak, Williston Amtrak, Stanley Amtrak, Minot Whiteƒsh Amtrak Amtrak, Rugby Amtrak, Devils Lake Amtrak, Grand 500 Depot St, Flathead County Forks Amtrak, Fargo Amtrak, Detroit Lakes Amtrak, Staples Amtrak, St. -
Local Law No. 2 of 1994
163 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE Local Law Filing 162 WASHINGTON AVENUE, ALBANY, NY 12231 (Use this form to file a local law with the Secretary of State.) Text of law should be given as amended. Do not include matter being eliminatedrand do not use italics or underlining to indicate new matter. County '7)1 2 ; 5 5 L.. Citf of Chenango YJR.K9 oi 2 Local Law No. of the yC'reCla'!;*:1-1:92::19''-4:..;:'If:F'F':11{-3':E: A local law AUTWRIZING CHENANGO COUNTY APPLICATION AND PARTICIPATION IN AN ECONOMIC (Insert Title) DEVELOPMENT ZONE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 18-B OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW Be it enacted by cbgA4AB o County Board of Supervisors of the (Name of Legislative Body) County Chenango of as follows: The Planning and Economic Development Committee offered the;.1; following and moved its adoption: ADOPTED LOCAL LAW NO. 2 OF 1994 "A COUNTY LOCAL LAW AUTHORIZING CHENANGO COUNTY APPLICATION AND - PARTICIPATION IN AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ZONE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE' 18-B OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW". BE IT ENACTED by the Board of Supervisors of Chenango County, as follows: SECTION 1. INTENT: It is hereby declared the intent of this Board that the County participate in the Economic Development Zone Program as an essential element in assuring the long term economic stability and growth of Chenango County and promoting the general welfare of County residents. SECTION 2. APPLICATION AUTHORIZATION: The County of Chenango is authorized to and may prepare and submit together with the Town of Norwich, the Town of North Norwich, and the City of Norwich an application and/or co- application to the New York State Commissioner of Economic Development for designation of a certain area, the boundaries of which are set forth in Section 5 hereof, as an Economic Development Zone under Article 18-B of the General Municipal Law. -
AGENDA Regional Planning Commission Wednesday, May 9, 2018 6:00 P.M
AGENDA Regional Planning Commission Wednesday, May 9, 2018 6:00 p.m. Washoe County Commission Chambers 1001 East Ninth Street, Reno, Nevada 1. Roll Call* 2. Salute to the Flag* 3. [For possible action] Approval of the Agenda 4. Approval of the Minutes A. [For possible action] March 14, 2018 Regional Planning Commission (RPC) Meeting [ Pg. 1 – 4 ] B. [For possible action] March 26, 2018 RPC Meeting [ Pg. 5 – 8 ] 5. Public Comment* 6. Consent Agenda A. [For possible action] – Consideration and possible acceptance of individual annual reports submitted by local governments and affected entities pursuant to subsection 1 of NRS 278.0286 [ Pg. 9 – 104 ] 7. Business of the day A. [For possible action] PUBLIC HEARING – Regional Plan Amendment (RPA18-001) – Consideration and possible action to adopt RPC Resolution 18-01 providing a recommendation to the Regional Planning Governing Board (RPGB) regarding a mapping amendment to Maps 9-11 of the 2012 Truckee Meadows Regional Plan adding a new regional utility site and a new regional utility corridor in the East Truckee River Canyon at 2505 State Route 447 [ Pg. 105 – 112 ] B. [For possible action] PUBLIC HEARING – Regional Plan Conformance Review – Project of Regional Significance, Dodge Flat Solar (CR18-004) – A project of regional significance (PRS) for the request to construct a new 200 Megawatt (MW) solar energy sub-station, ancillary facilities including two 90-foot private communication antennas and to connect the project to an existing 345 kilovolt (kV) transmission line in the East Truckee -
Closing Military Bases: National Disaster Or National Opportunity?
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 1994 Closing Military Bases: National Disaster or National Opportunity? Brooke Danielle Wortham University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Wortham, Brooke Danielle, "Closing Military Bases: National Disaster or National Opportunity?" (1994). Theses (Historic Preservation). 477. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/477 Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Wortham, Brooke Danielle. (1994). Closing Military Bases: National Disaster or National Opportunity?. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/477 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Closing Military Bases: National Disaster or National Opportunity? Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Wortham, Brooke Danielle. (1994). Closing Military Bases: National Disaster or National Opportunity?. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/477 -
Febuary-March
Washington Rail News February /march 200 999 www.AllAboardWashington.org Publication of All Aboard Washington A Not ---for-forforfor----profitprofit Consumer Organization “Moving forward...On Rail ."."." established with the relaunch of the Amtrak ridership bucks national trends with Builder in August 2005 and the public strong growth in 2008; Northwest train capacity continues to show its support by riding this train. strained even as new stops and improved stations It’s rather amazing that Coast Star- encourage continuing ridership increases light ridership increased in 2008, con - Nationwide, Amtrak ridership was 760,323, up 12.8% over sidering the route was partially or com - soared 11.1% in fiscal year 2008 2007; revenue was $20,999,003, pletely annulled between Jan. 20 and (ending Sept. 30) over 2007, setting a up 15.8%. Total Northwest Corri- May 6 because of the massive land - new all time record. This increase dor ridership (including Coast slide t hat wiped out the Union Pacific comes at the same time auto and air Starlight passengers riding solely mainline in the Oregon Cascades. The travel have plunged. And even the in the corridor) was 847,563, up Starlight received upgraded amenities substantial drop in gas prices since last 15.4% over 2007. and services this past summer and on- July has had little impact on the pub- • Empire Builder: FY 2008 time performance has improved mar - lic’s reductions in driving, though the ridership was 554,266, up 9.8% kedly from 2007. This improvement led over 2007; revenue was Amtrak to announce that effective Feb.