DOCSLIB.ORG

A Bureau of J~Ustice Assistance I J.~ .]Koffice-Ofjustice Programs, U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Bureau of J~Ustice Assistance I J.~ .]Koffice-Ofjustice Programs, U.S If you have issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov. I II ~A Bureau of J~ustice Assistance i J.~ .]kOffice-ofJustice Programs, U.S. Departmentof Justice I Nancy E. Gist, Director April 1998 I I |~pact ~;tate~ents an~i I Research and Evaluation Reports I I I I I I I 99~ State Annua~ R~por~s Edward Byme Memoria| State and ~-or I ~L Law Enforcement Assistance Program $~a~e EvaCuation Deve~opmen~ Program I Bureau of Justice Assistance Office of Justice Programs I ~o$o Departmen~ of Justice I I I U.So Department of Justice g Office of Justice Programs 810 Seventh Street, NW ,g Washington, DC 20531 Janet Reno g Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice | Raymond C. Fisher Associate Attorney General | Laurie Robinson Assistant Attorney General | Nancy E. Gist Director, Bureau of Justice Assistance | | U.S. Department of Justice Response Center 1-800-421-6770 I Bureau of Justice Assistance Clearinghouse 1-800-688-4252 II g Bureau of Justice Assistance World Wide Web Home Page http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/BJA II This document was prepared by the Justice Research and Statistics Association, under cooperative g agreement number 95-DD-BX-K011, provided by the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies 6 of the U.S. Department of Justice. | The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also | includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims of Crime. | I i I I I , I ~[mpact Statements and I Research and Eva~uation Reports I fro~ the ~997 State A~uan Report5 I Edward Byrne Memorfia~ $ta~e and Local Law Enforcement Assfistance Program I Aprfi~ ~1998 I I , ! Prepared by the ~ustice ]Research and Statistics Association I 777 North Capitol Street, N.E. Suite 80~ ! Washington, DC 20002 (202) 842-9330 I I I I g. Acknowledgments g This document resulted from a cooperative effort by the states and the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) as part of the State Evaluation Development Program, which is coordinated by the Justice Research and Statistics II Association (JRSA). The Impact Statements and Research and Evaluation Reports presented in this document were obtained from the 1997 State Annual Reports (SARs) submitted to BJA. The SARs document each state's drug control and criminal justice system improvement activities under the Edward Byrne Memorial State and | Local Law Enforcement Assistance Program. The Justice Research and Statistics Association prepared this document under the direction of Joan C. Weiss, l Executive Director. The following JRSA staff compiled and edited the information for this document under the supervision of Deputy Director, Kellie J. Dressier: Laura Parisi, Program Assistant, Nancy Michel, Publications Manager, Kate Wagner, Program Intern, and Ruth Cardella, Consultant. IB I I 1 g il a il a g g g g Table of Con~en~s Introduction ................................................................. l ]Impact Statements ............................................................ 3 Alabama ............................................................... 3 Alaska ................................................................ 5 American Samoa ........................................................ 7 Arizona ............................................................... 10 Arkansas .............................................................. 12 California ............................................................. 15 Colorado .............................................................. 17 Connecticut ........................................................... 19 Delaware ............................................................. 21 District of Columbia .................................................... 25 Florida ............................................................... 29 Georgia ............................................................... 33 Guam ................................................................ 35 Hawaii ............................................................... 37 Idaho ................................................................ 40 Illinois ............................................................... 43 Indiana ............................................................... 44 Iowa ................................................................. 46 Kansas ............................................................... 48 Kentucky ............................................................. 51 Louisiana ............................................................. 53 Maine ................................................................ 57 Maryland ............................................................. 60 Massachusetts ......................................................... 61 Michigan ............................................................. 66 Minnesota ............................................................. 68 Mississippi ............................................................ 70 Missouri .............................................................. 72 Montana .............................................................. 74 Nebraska ............................................................. 76 Nevada ............................................................... 79 New Hampshire ........................................................ 81 New Jersey ............................................................ 83 New Mexico ........................................................... 86 New York ............................................................. 88 North Carolina ......................................................... 91 I g North Dakota .......................................................... 93 Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands .............................. 95 g Ohio ................................................................. 97 Oklahoma ............................................................. 98 Oregon ............................................................... 99 g Pennsylvania ......................................................... 101 Rhode Island ......................................................... 103 South Carolina ........................................................ 106 II South Dakota ......................................................... 109 Tennessee ............................................................ 111 g Texas ............................................................... 114 Utah ................................................................ 116 Vermont ............................................................. 119 g Virginia ............................................................. 121 Washington .......................................................... 123 g West Virginia ......................................................... 125 Wisconsin ............................................................ 126 Wyoming ............................................................ 128 ,0 Research and Evaluation Reports ............................................. 131 g 0 | | g a ,! a | g ~ntroductfion Sec. 522 (a) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 3711, et_.~__q., requires that the states annually submit to the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) a report concerning the activities carried out under i the Formula Grant Program. The State Annual Reports (SARs) report on and provide information on programs funded under the Formula Grant Program and evaluation activities and results. These performance reports provide the basis i for the annual report from BJA to the President and the Congress as required by Sec. 522 (b) of the Act. The Impact Statements section of this publication is a compilation of the executive summaries from the 1997 SARs submitted to BJA. The Impact Statements present a synopsis of the information contained in each report, and provide I an overview of programs as they link to program priorities and objectives outlined in each state's drug control and violent crime strategy. This section also describes how and to what extent each state's programs have contributed to the goals of the Formula Grant Program. All grant programs that were active during the report period are included in the summary of programs. Reports on successful, innovative, or promising programs and practices are highlighted I in the Research and Evaluation Reports section. The reports listed in this section range from program descriptions to trend analyses to assessments and evaluations. I I I I I ! l I i 1 I I 1 lImpae $ a emen s Anabama Alabama is pleased to present our report of the programs and activities funded under the Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Formula Grant Program during the time period July 1, 1996, through June 30, 1997. The report is organized in four sections: (1) Introduction, (2) Summary of Programs, (3) Summary of Evaluation Activities and Results, (4) Exhibits. Alabama's anti-drug program activities funded under the Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Formula Grant are administered through the Alabama Department of Economic and Community Affairs, Law Enforcement and Traffic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Women and the Law in Colonial Maryland, 1648-1715 Monica C
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects "Justice Without Partiality": Women and the Law in Colonial Maryland, 1648-1715 Monica C. Witkowski Marquette University Recommended Citation Witkowski, Monica C., ""Justice Without Partiality": Women and the Law in Colonial Maryland, 1648-1715" (2010). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 27. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/27 “JUSTICE WITHOUT PARTIALITY”: WOMEN AND THE LAW IN COLONIAL MARYLAND, 1648-1715 by Monica C. Witkowski A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2010 ABSTRACT “JUSTICE WITHOUT PARTIALITY”: WOMEN AND THE LAW IN COLONIAL MARYLAND, 1648-1715 Monica C. Witkowski Marquette University, 2010 What was the legal status of women in early colonial Maryland? This is the central question answered by this dissertation. Women, as exemplified through a series of case studies, understood the law and interacted with the nascent Maryland legal system. Each of the cases in the following chapters is slightly different. Each case examined in this dissertation illustrates how much independent legal agency women in the colony demonstrated. Throughout the seventeenth century, Maryland women appeared before the colony’s Provincial and county courts as witnesses, plaintiffs, defendants, and attorneys in criminal and civil trials. Women further entered their personal cattle marks, claimed land, and sued other colonists. This study asserts that they improved their social standing through these interactions with the courts. By exerting this much legal knowledge, they created an important place for themselves in Maryland society. Historians have begun to question the interpretation that Southern women were restricted to the home as housewives and mothers.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Dawn Clark Netsch # ISL-A-L-2010-013.07 Interview # 7: September 17, 2010 Interviewer: Mark Depue
    Interview with Dawn Clark Netsch # ISL-A-L-2010-013.07 Interview # 7: September 17, 2010 Interviewer: Mark DePue COPYRIGHT The following material can be used for educational and other non-commercial purposes without the written permission of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library. “Fair use” criteria of Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 must be followed. These materials are not to be deposited in other repositories, nor used for resale or commercial purposes without the authorization from the Audio-Visual Curator at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library, 112 N. 6th Street, Springfield, Illinois 62701. Telephone (217) 785-7955 Note to the Reader: Readers of the oral history memoir should bear in mind that this is a transcript of the spoken word, and that the interviewer, interviewee and editor sought to preserve the informal, conversational style that is inherent in such historical sources. The Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library is not responsible for the factual accuracy of the memoir, nor for the views expressed therein. We leave these for the reader to judge. DePue: Today is Friday, September 17, 2010 in the afternoon. I’m sitting in an office located in the library at Northwestern University Law School with Senator Dawn Clark Netsch. Good afternoon, Senator. Netsch: Good afternoon. (laughs) DePue: You’ve had a busy day already, haven’t you? Netsch: Wow, yes. (laughs) And there’s more to come. DePue: Why don’t you tell us quickly what you just came from? Netsch: It was not a debate, but it was a forum for the two lieutenant governor candidates sponsored by the group that represents or brings together the association for the people who are in the public relations business.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Safety
    PUBLIC SAFETY 010 In Review 2 Part I crime in Greenbelt decreased 6.8% in 2010, from 1,396 reported incidents in 2009 to 1,300. Part I crimes are defined as murder, rape, robbery, assault, burglary, theft and auto theft. By comparison, the Washington Metropolitan region of Montgomery and Prince George’s counties, known as UCR Region IV, experienced a 10.5% decrease in 2009, according to the latest published Maryland State Police Uniform Crime Report (May 10, 2010). Violent crimes of murder, rape, robbery and aggravated assault involve the element of personal confrontation between the perpetrator and the victim; consequently they are considered more serious crimes than property crimes because of their very nature. These offenses accounted for 16% of all crime in Maryland. For Greenbelt, violent crime comprised 14% of all Part I crimes indicating that Greenbelt falls in line with statewide violent crime trends. Crimes against persons, at 185, were the lowest since 2004, driven by a 17% decline in robbery, 106 reported incidents. Robbery remains the most prevalent violent crime in our community, accounting for 57% of all personal crime. Sixty- six (66) robberies occurred in Greenbelt West (62.2%), twenty-nine (29) in Greenbelt East (27.3%) and eleven (11) in historic Greenbelt (10.3%). The number of property crimes reported during 2010 (1,115) was over six times greater than the number of violent crimes. As a group, property crime made up 86% of the total crimes in 2010. Property crimes decreased 7% overall. Notably, motor vehicle theft (133) declined 25%. Geographically, 51% of crime occurred in Greenbelt West, 35% in Greenbelt East and 14% in historic Greenbelt.
    [Show full text]
  • TITLE Now Is the Time: an Action Agenda for Improvi% G Black and Minority Health in Maryland. the Final Report of the Maryland Governor's Commission on Black and Minority Health
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 326 585 UD 026 889 TITLE Now Is the Time: An Action Agenda for Improvi%g Black and Minority Health in Maryland. The Final Report of the Maryland Governor's Commission on Black and Minority Health. INSTITUTION Maryland Governor's Commission on Black and Minority Health, Baltimore.; Maryland State Dept. of Health and Mental Hygiene, Baltimore. PUB DATE Nov 87 NOTE 228p. AVAILABLE FROMMaryland Dept. of Health and Mental Hygiene, Policy and Health Statistics Administration, Division of Policy Analysis, 201 West Preston Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. PUB TYPE Reports - Research/Technical (243) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC10 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Blacks; Demography; *Health Needs; *Health Promotion; Health Services; Hearinas; Migrant Workers; *Minority Groups; Mortality Rate; Public Health; *Racial Differences; Refugees; State Surveys; Whites IDENTIFIERS *Access to Health Care; *Maryland ABSTRACT This document comprises a report on the disparity between the health status of Maryland's blacks and minorities and the white population. Information was gathered from statewide public hearings at which over 50 individuals and groups representing the general public and health care providers testified. The major finding was that a disproportionate number of black and minority Marylanders died needlessly between 1983 and 1985 from diseases, homicide, or accidents that were either preventable or controllable. Although Maryland has one of the best health care delivery systems in the nation, major improvements are needed if the health status
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Robert Mandeville # IST-A-L-2013-103 Interview # 1: December 6, 2013 Interviewer: Mike Czaplicki
    Interview with Robert Mandeville # IST-A-L-2013-103 Interview # 1: December 6, 2013 Interviewer: Mike Czaplicki COPYRIGHT The following material can be used for educational and other non-commercial purposes without the written permission of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library. “Fair use” criteria of Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 must be followed. These materials are not to be deposited in other repositories, nor used for resale or commercial purposes without the authorization from the Audio-Visual Curator at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library, 112 N. 6th Street, Springfield, Illinois 62701. Telephone (217) 785-7955 Czaplicki: Today is Friday, December 6, 2013. My name is Mike Czaplicki. I'm the project historian for the Governor Thompson Oral History Project here at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library. I'm with Dr. Robert Mandeville, who was Governor Thompson's budget director for most of his tenure. He's been gracious enough to come in on a very cold day and sit down and chat with us. Thank you, Bob. Mandeville: You're welcome. Czaplicki: We always like to start at the beginning with these things and ask, when and where were you born? Mandeville: Nineteen thirty-one, April 29, in Jacksonville, Illinois. Czaplicki: What is this document we're looking at here? Is this a scrapbook of yours? An autobiography?1 Mandeville: Yes, written about three years ago. Czaplicki: Unpublished? Mandeville: Unpublished, yes. I wrote it for my kids and my grandkids. Czaplicki: Oh, excellent. I'd like to take a look at that at some point in some more detail.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Publications of the State of Illinois
    PUBLICATIONS OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS 2014 agriculture education JESSE WHITE SECRETARY OF STATE & STATE LIBRARIAN Illinois State Library government Gwendolyn Brooks Building 300 S. Second St. Springfield, IL 62701 KEY: * Sent to depository libraries @ Serials $ Supersedes previous issue e Ephemeral PUBLICATIONS 9-1-1 SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD. ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION. @ Report to the Illinois General Assembly. 2014. 57p. I384.64 I29r OCLC# 879333903 ADMINISTRATIVE CODE DIVISION. INDEX DEPARTMENT. OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE. * @ Illinois register. vol. 38, issue 1 – issue 52. January 3 – December 26, 2014. (web site: http://www.cyberdriveillinois.com/departments/index/register/register.html) (PURL: http://iledi.org/ppa/meta/html/00/00/00/00/07/14.html) I348.02 ILLIa OCLC# 3763989 @ Illinois register. Yearly index volume 36 issues 1-52, January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012. 2013. 1 vol. (web site: http://www.cyberdriveillinois.com/departments/index/register/register.html) (PURL: http://iledi.org/ppa/meta/html/00/00/00/00/07/14.html) I348.02 ILLI CUMU 2a INDEX OCLC# 54533145 * @ Illinois register. Yearly index volume 37 issues 1-52, January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013. 2014. 1 vol. (web site: http://www.cyberdriveillinois.com/departments/index/register/register.html) (PURL: http://iledi.org/ppa/meta/html/00/00/00/00/07/14.html) ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE ILLINOIS COURTS. * @ Annual report of the Illinois courts, administrative summary, 2013. 2014. 58p. I347.773 ADMI OCLC# 31323475 * @ Annual report of the Illinois courts, statistical summary, 2013. 2014. 159p. I347.773 ADMI 2 OCLC# 31878244 ADMINISTRATIVE RULES, JOINT COMMITTEE ON. GENERAL ASSEMBLY. * @ Annual report of the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Safety
    PUBLIC SAFETY 011 In Review 2 Serious crime, or UCR Part I, decreased 27% in 2011, from 1,300 reported incidents to 947. Serious crimes are defined as murder, rape, robbery, assault, burglary, theft and auto theft. By comparison, the Washington Metropolitan region of Montgomery and Prince George’s counties, known as UCR Region IV, experienced a 7% decrease according to the latest published Maryland State Police Uniform Crime Report (July 20, 2011). Violent crimes of murder, rape and aggravated assault involve the element of personal confrontation between the perpetrator and the victim; consequently they are considered more serious crimes than property crimes because of their very nature. These offenses accounted for 16% of all crime in Maryland. For Greenbelt, violent crime comprised 14% of all Part I crimes indicating that Greenbelt falls in line with statewide violent crime trends. Crimes against persons declined 29.7% in 2011, from 185 incidents to 130. Robbery, having dropped 15% from 106 to 90, remains the most prevalent violent crime in our community accounting for 9.5% of all Part I crimes. Forty-six percent (42) of the robberies occurred in Greenbelt West, 36% (33) in Greenbelt East and 17% (15) in Historic Greenbelt. In Maryland, robbery accounted for 35% of violent crime and 6% of the Part I crime index. There were no homicides in 2011, after averaging one annually for the last five years. The number of property crimes (852) was nearly 9 times greater than the number of violent crimes. As a group, property crime made up 90% of the total crime index in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • 96 Annual Rep2
    ILLINOIS CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION AUTHORITY w POLICE INFORMATION SYSTEMS w CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESEARCH w FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS ADMINISTRATION 1999 ANNUAL REPORT Table of contents Letter to the governor .............................................................................. 3 Our mission.............................................................................................. 5 Composition and membership ............................................................... 6 Committees .............................................................................................. 9 Staff organization................................................................................... 10 Federal and state grants ........................................................................ 12 Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Council.............................................. 24 Research and analysis ........................................................................... 25 Information systems............................................................................... 29 Fiscal information.................................................................................. 33 Publications ........................................................................................... 34 On the cover: A Cicero police officer tracks information with the Area-wide Law Enforcement Radio Terminal System (ALERTS). Developed by the Authority, ALERTS serves more than 300 police agencies in Illinois. (Photo by Cristin Monti) Printed by authority
    [Show full text]
  • A Management Information and Program Evaluation System for the State of Maryland
    A Management Information And Program Evaluation System For The State of Maryland A REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR AND GENERAL ASSEMBLY GOVERNOR'S TASK FORCE ON MODERN MANAGEMENT in cooperation with The University of Maryland under the auspices of Title I of the Higher Education Assistance Act JANUARY 1989 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT |) STATE OFFICE BUILDING ^I^L^If89 301 WEST PRESTON STREET BALTIMORE. MARYLAND 21201 MARVIN MANDEL GOVERNOR March 11, 1969 MEMORANDUM To: Department Heads and Seminar Participants in the Management Information and Program Evaluation System From: John J. McCormick, Jr., Director Management Information Program Re: Report - "A Management Information and Program Evaluation System for the State of Maryland" The report on our efforts during the summer and fall is attached. In the front are some recommendations and review notes. I took as samples for the review notes several programs that were'done rather well^and which illustrate some typical types of questions which we hope will be raised by this effort. I appreciate the time and effort you all put in on this project and I hope to work with you again this year in a continuation of the program. Thank you. JJM/mch Attachment K* MANAGEMENT INFORMATION AND PROGRAM EVALUATION SYSTEM A Report to the Governor and General Assembly January, 1969 CONTENTS Page Number PROGRAM SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS i LETTER TO GOVERNOR ii REVIEW NOTES • . • ix DEPARTMENTAL PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS Section Number Assessments and Taxation, Department of 1 Bank Commissioner, State 2 Board of Natural Resources
    [Show full text]
  • A Profile of the Multi-County Narcotics Enforcement Group
    Assessing Illinois’ Metropolitan Enforcement Groups and Task Forces JO DAVIESS STEPHENSON WINNEBAGO BOONE MCHENRY LAKE CARROLL OGLE DEKALB KANE DUPAGE COOK WHITESIDE LEE KENDALL WILL ROCK ISLAND BUREAU HENRY LASALLE GRUNDY MERCER PUTNAM KANKAKEE STARK MARSHALL KNOX LIVINGSTON 120 S. Riverside Plaza, HENDERSON WARREN WOODFORD PEORIA Suite 1016 IROQUOIS Chicago, Illinois 60606 FORD TAZEWELL MCLEAN MCDONOUGH FULTON HANCOCK Tel: (312) 793-8550 MASON VERMILION Fax: (312) 793-8422 DEWITT SCHUYLER CHAMPAIGN TDD: (312) 793-4170 LOGAN MENARD PIATT ADAMS BROWN CASS www.icjia.state.il.us MACON SANGAMON DOUGLAS MORGAN EDGAR PIKE SCOTT MOULTRIE CHRISTIAN COLES SHELBY CALHOUN GREENE CLARK Prepared by MACOUPIN CUMBERLAND MONTGOMERY JERSEY EFFINGHAM The Research and FAYETTE JASPER CRAWFORD BOND Analysis Unit MADISON CLAY RICHLAND LAWRENCE MARION CLINTON S D WABASH ST. CLAIR R A WAYNE W D E WASHINGTON JEFFERSON MONROE PERRY HAMILTON WHITE RANDOLPH FRANKLIN JACKSON SALINE GALLATIN WILLIAMSON Rod R. Blagojevich Governor HARDIN UNION JOHNSON POPE ALEXANDER Sheldon Sorosky PULASKI MASSAC Chairman Lori G. Levin Executive Director A Profile of the Multi-County March 2004 Narcotics Enforcement Group This project was supported by Grant # 02-DB-BX-0017, awarded to the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority by the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The Assistant Attorney General, Office of Justice Programs, coordinates the activities of the following programs, offices and bureaus: Bureau of Justice Assistance, Bureau of Justice Statistics, National Institute of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims of Crime. Points of view or opinions contained within this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • IN MARYLAND I I I I I I I I I En 'I UNIFORM CRIME REPORTS I R.....---______
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov. I I I 19 7 I I I I I IN MARYLAND I I I I I I I I I en 'I UNIFORM CRIME REPORTS I r.....---_________........ t"" I IN MEMORIAM I I Members of the Criminal Records - Central Repository express their sympathy to the families of Maryland law enforcement officers who were killed in the line of duty. In 1977, those officers killed I were: I DENNIS L. RILEY Patrolman First Class I Charles County Sheriff's Department 1948 - 1977 I * PAUL N. MITCHELL I Patroluan, Anne Arundel County Police Department 1946 - 1977 I * I CHARLES A. HUCKEBA Patrolman, Baltimore County Police Department I 1951 - 1977 I * GREGG A. PRESBURY ,I Trooper, Maryland State Police 1950 - 1977 I I I I I I .. I I I I I I , I '}STATE OF MARYLAND 'I UNIFORM CRIME REPORTS I I -- .., I BLAIR lEE III I ACTING GOVERNOR I ROBERT J. lAllY I SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL II SERVICES II THOM.AS S. SMITH SUPERINTENDENT, MARYLAND I STATE POLICE I I L..-.________________ ~ -- ------ ------------------------------------------- . .. I CRIMINAL RECORDS I CENTRAL REPOSITORY I I MAJOR H. W. DASHIELlS DIRECTOR I LAMONT EDWARDS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR I VICTOR J. KONSAVAGE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE I EDGAR H. WHITEMAN FIELD REPRESENTATIVE I' ROBERT J. SPANGLER FIELD REPRfiSENT A TIVE I I UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING SECTION I -------.~-.------------------------------- ROSE MARIE DECARLO ADMINISTRATIVE SPECIALIST I STAFF I JANET L. ASBURY I M. ANTOINETTE COMFORT BARBARA JACOBS I ANN LEVIN I ELEANOR D.
    [Show full text]
  • ILLINOIS CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION AUTHORITY 2020 ANNUAL REPORT Grant Administration | Research & Analysis | Information Systems
    State of Illinois JB Pritzker, Governor Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority Delrice Adams, Acting Executive Director ILLINOIS CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION AUTHORITY 2020 ANNUAL REPORT Grant Administration | Research & Analysis | Information Systems Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority2020 Annual Report • Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority • www.icjia.state.il.us • 1 To the Governor and the Honorable Members of the General Assembly: n behalf of the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority, I am pleased to present the Fiscal Year 2020 ICJIA Annual Report. This report features ICJIA’s work in Illinois criminal Ojustice policy and planning, grants administration, research, and information systems With grant administration and capacity building, ICJIA supported programs that serve vic- timdevelopment populations during across the the fiscal state, year. promote decarceration, reduce violence, and restore communi- Delrice Adams ties. ICJIA administered 24 state and federal grant programs in FY20, including the state’s Com- munity-Based Violence Intervention and Prevention program and the federal Victims of Crime and Violence Against Women acts. More than 300 grants were processed, with $106.7 million in Despite the impact of COVID on the very vulnerable populations our programs serve, many grantees were resil- disbursements made for the fiscal year. and allow shifts in new priorities for how funding would be spent as it related to COVID. This helped support our many granteesient and creativeduring this
    [Show full text]