University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Copyright By

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Copyright By This dissertation has been 65-11, 693 microfilmed exactly as received PAUL, George Harold, 1910- THE RELIGIOUS FRONTIER IN OKLAHOMA: DAN T. MUSE AND THE PENTECOSTAL HOLINESS CHURCH. The University of Oklahoma, Ph. D ., 1965 History, modern University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Copyright by GEORGE HAROLD PAUL 1965 THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE THE RELIGIOUS FRONTIER IN OKLAHOMA: DAN T. MUSE AND THE PENTECOSTAL HOLINESS CHURCH A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY GEORGE HAROLD PAUL Norman, Oklahoma 1965 THE RELIGIOUS FRONTIER IN OKLAHOMA: DAN T. MUSE AND THE PENTECOSTAL HOLINESS CHURCH APPROVED BY Æ j=L DISSERTATION COMMITTEE ACKNOWLEDGMENT I express sincere thanks to the Muse family, especially Rev, Scott T, Muse, who not only made his father's files and records available for this research, but also traveled many miles and arranged numerous inter­ views. I am also grateful to the Official Board of the Oklahoma Confer­ ence of the Pentecostal Holiness Church who made available their confi­ dential files to assist in the completion of this task. Similar grati­ tude is expressed to Bishop J. A. Synan for his kindness in arranging for the use of the Minutes of the General Board of the denomination. Words of appreciation must also be given to the many informants listed in the bibliography who shared their knowledge on this subject of common interest. I am also deeply indebted to the members of the History Department, Faculty and the University of Oklahoma, notably Dr. Alfred B. Sears and Dr. Gilbert C. Fite, who particularly merit my gratitude. Special appreciation must be given Dr. A. M. Gibson, who directed the preparation of this dissertation and went far beyond the required limits in giving of his time and understanding, as well as the benefits of his scholarship and experience. Finally, 1 wish to express my thanks and appreciation to Edna, my wife, for her constant assistance and to Mrs. Betty Bones and Mrs. Patsy Wilkins who typed the manuscript. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENT............................................... i ü Chapter I. ROOTS OF THE OKLAHOMA PENTECOSTAL HOLINESS CHURCH . 1 II. JOSEPH H. KING AND THE FIRE-BAPTIZED HOLINESS CHURCH . 22 III. THE PENTECOSTAL HOLINESS CHURCH, PENTECOST AND CONSOLIDATION.....................................35 IV. A NEW CHURCH COMES TO OKLAHOMA....................... 60 V. THE MAKING OF A MINISTER............................ 71 VI. GAINING RECOGNITION..................................85 VII. PENTECOSTAL HOLINESS POLITY ........................... 108 VIII. FROM SUPERINTENDENT TO B I S H O P .............. .... 122 IX. THE CHURCH MOVES A H E A D ............................ 140 X. EDUCATION AND THE PENTECOSTAL HOLINESS CHURCH......... 160 XI. WORLD OUTREACH OF THE PENTECOSTAL HOLINESS CHURCH, PART I . 197 XII. WORLD OUTREACH OF THE PENTECOSTAL HOLINESS CHURCH, PART II. 223 XIII. DAN T. MUSE AND THE CHURCH AUXILIARIES.............. 237 XIV. PENTECOSTAL HOLINESS AND THE F U T U R E ................. 261 BIBLIOGRAPHY................................................ 295 CHAPTER I ROOTS OF THE OKLAHOMA PENTECOSTAL HOLINESS CHURCH In September, 1909 at Lament, Oklahoma, Rev. f rancis Marion Britton, Assistant General Overseer of the Fire-Baptized Holiness Church, organized the Oklahoma Conference which became known in 1911 as the Pentecostal Holi­ ness Church. The Oklahoma Conference was very small, consisting of only one church and nine ministers. It was part of a relatively new church organization which began at Olmitz, Iowa in 1895.1 The Pentecostal Holiness Church, and the other groups which eventually united with it, grew out of the social and religious ferment prevalent in the late nineteenth century. It was a part of the conservative, funda­ mentalist movement in American religion which resulted in the formation of the Wesleyan Methodists, the Free Methodists, the Church of the Nazarene, and some twenty or thirty other denominations.2 These groups did not all agree on theological beliefs and church organizational patterns. They were similar in that they emphasized personal conversion to Christ in a recognizable experience and exemplary personal conduct in daily living. Perhaps the most distinctive thing about these groups was their insist­ ence upon the doctrine of holiness. All members of these groups were expected to conform to the teachings of Christ, and they were required to do so not only by choice but also through what their leaders claimed was a new moral strength received in ^Minutes of the Oklahoma Conference of the Pentecostal Holiness Church, 1964, ed. Alfred Spell (Franklin Springs, Georgia: Advocate Press, 1964), 32; Joseph H. King, "History of the Fire-Baptized Holiness Church", Pente­ costal Holiness Advocate, TV (March 24, 1921), 4. bishop Wilson T. Hogue, History of the Free Methodist Church of North America (Chicago: The Free Methodist Publishing House, 1915), I, 319-20. connection with the experience of conversion.^ Because Holiness doctrine held that when a member violated these he was lost, the question of con­ sistent living was of vital importance to these people. John Wesley, recognized by all groups related to the Methodist Church as the authority on holiness, differentiated between inward desire and outward sin. He taught that while man was not held responsible for his inherited depravity, nevertheless, it was this moral bent which was largely responsible for a life out of harmony with Christ’s principles. Of course, Wesley recognized that such factors as native intelligence, physical condition, and some aspects of environment would also condition the responses of an individual. But Wesley also taught that it was the privilege of every believer to have the sinful disposition of the soul removed by a definite act of faith. All candidates for the ministry of the Methodist Churches were ex­ pected to know this teaching and to have experienced it. When this experience was received, it was claimed that the recipient would know the presence of God and delight in doing God’s will. The fundamental change was considered to be within rather than without. Whereas in the past he might have successfully resisted temptation all the time, aware of a desire within to yield; when sanctified, or made perfect in Christian love, it was taught that he would have no desire for sin. Holiness teach­ ings held that persons enjoying such an experience were expected to be able to endure adversity with a serenity and an attitude of goodwill to others which was not usual in the field of human relations. The claim of receiving divine grace by a person sincerely seeking after truth and Christ-likeness was not considered by Wesley and others Bjohn Wesley, "The Marks of the New Birth", The Works of John Wesley (New York: Carleton and Porter, 1856), I, 161. 3 as some new religious discovery; instead, they regarded it as the recovery of knowledge originally a part of the Christian heritage.4 Consequently, the founders of what was called Methodism did not feel that they were starting a new church or were in any manner schismatic. While they did emphasize certain truths which seemed to them to have been neglected, so had other religious leaders. Wesley never considered himself sectarian and remained an ordained minister of the Church of England until his death. While the followers of Wesley were not monastic in the usual sense of the word and placed no emphasis on the advantages of the unmarried state, nevertheless, these early leaders felt called upon to live such lives of devotion and personal sacrifice, especially in the pioneer sections of America, that they often denied themselves the privilege of marriage. They did so, however, not to meet some religious requirement but to fulfill more adequately their calling in life.5 Since they considered their physical bodies to be the temple of God, they felt it their duty to avoid eating or drinking anything calculated to harm or defile them. Consequently, they were opposed to the drinking of intoxicants as well as the use of tobacco. So rigid was Wesley at this point that he even preached against drinking tea and then changed his opinion upon more mature consideration.& Dancing, card-playing and the like were also disapproved, as calculated not to aid the development of one's ^Wesley, "A Plain Account of Christian Perfection", Works, VI, 483-84. ---- W, Sweet, The Story of Religion in America (New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers, 1939), 319, ^Wesley, "Use of Tea Censured", Works, III, 371. 4 spirituality, as were any and all customs which might be similarly classified.? This stipulation also covered matters of dress so far as style and ornamentation were concerned. It might be stated that the Methodists tended more to follow the Calvinistic attitude of approving only what the Bible approved, instead of the Lutheran custom of condemning only what the Bible condemned. As in the case of the Huguenots,the Methodists usually started their organizational work in the neglected and underprivileged areas, and they claimed that acceptance of their teachings produced changes in the economic, social, and religious aspects of life.^ As time passed the social status of Methodists improved, and their influence in England increased even in Wesley’s day.9 While Methodists did not then have a separate church, some historians claimed that their organization and teaching helped prevent a repetition of the French Revolution on English soil.^® In spite of the teaching on holiness, Methodists in general and John Wesley in particular were not pacifists but loyal citizens of their country and willing to bear arms for its defense.While Wesley him­ self sympathized with the colonists in their struggle with England, it ?Wesley, "On Leaving the World", Works, II, 204. ®6. H. Harwood, History of Wesleyan Methodism in Nottingham and Its Vicinity (Nottingham; n. p., 1872), 30. ^The first local preacher in Bedford was also Mayor, as early as 1751, Wesleyan Historical Society Proceedings, II (1899), 124.
Recommended publications
  • November 1976
    THE DETROIT CONFERENCE HISTORICAL MESSENGER Published by the "Friends of the Archives" Ronald A. Brunger, Editor Vol. IV. No. 5 November 1976 TABLE OF CONTENTS PHILIP EMBURY, METHODIST PIONEER by Wm. Cardwell Prout Let's Keep Selling Our Books Page 1 Philip Embury, Methodist Pioneer 1-2 One root of United Methodism in Amer­ Our National Methodist Shrines 2-3 ica goes back to a group of second and Historic Sites in Michigan 3 third generation Germans, descendants of A Centennial Service 4 the Palatines who nad settled in Limerick An Outdoor Bicentennial Service 4 County Ireland, to escape persecution in An Arduous Early Life 4-5-6 their homeland. One young man, Philip Embury, born about 1728, was converted under t he prea­ LET'S KEEP SELLING OUR BOOKS ching of John Wesley on Christman Day 1752. In his diary, Embury has this comment on Our new history of Michigan Methodism his conversion: "The Lord shone into my covering the 20th Century to date, was pub­ soul by a glimpse of his redeeming love: lished six months ago. Volume I, by Dr. being an earnest of my redemption in Christ Margaret Macmillan of Western Michigan Jesus to whom be glory for ever and ever. University, has 4j0 pages, over 50 pictures Amen.•• plus charts, appendices, and index. Volume A carpenter by trade, he became a Me ­ II, by Dr. A. Douglas MacNaughton of Adrian thodist local preacher . In 1760, some of College, has 650 pages, about 100 pictures, these Germans living in Ireland, including plus charts, appendices and index.
    [Show full text]
  • “Redeeming the Time”: the Making of Early American Methodism
    “REDEEMING THE TIME”: THE MAKING OF EARLY AMERICAN METHODISM By Michael Kenneth Turner Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Religion May, 2009 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Dean James Hudnut-Beumler Professor M. Douglas Meeks Professor James P. Byrd Professor Dennis C. Dickerson Copyright ©2009 by Michael Kenneth Turner Al Rights Reserved To my ever-supportive and loving wife, Stephanie and To my father, Thomas, who helped every step of the way iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The idea for this dissertation took nascent form during my time as a participant in the 2006 Wesley Studies Seminar. I am very grateful for the fellowship from Duke Divinity School that enabled me to participate in the seminar and do early research on the dissertation. In particular, I would like to thank that group’s helpful leader and organizer, Dr. Richard Heitzenrater. I am also appreciative of the conversations, suggestions, and encouragement I received from Dean Laceye Warner (Duke Divinity School), Dr. Jason Vickers (United Theological Seminary), Dr. Sarah Lancaster (Methodist Theological School of Ohio), Dr. Rex Matthews (Candler School of Theology), and Dr. Steve McCormick (Nazarene Theological Seminary) both during and following the seminar. I am also thankful for all my colleagues and mentors at Vanderbilt University. First and foremost, I would like to thank the members of my dissertation committee. Dean James Hudnut-Beumler, my chair, is among the most knowledgeable students of American Religious History that I know. I am very grateful for his guidance through the program.
    [Show full text]
  • Forever Beginning 3
    Forever Beginning 3 FOREVER BEGINNING by Stephen W. Barninger, 1966 [editor’s note: This paper was prepared for the Bicentennial Oratorical Contest for senior high youth sponsored by the Conference Historical Society in connection with the celebration of the Bicentennial of American Methodism held at the 1966 annual conference. The 1966 date uses the 1766 preaching of Philip Embury in New York as the start of Methodism in America, but it has since been established that Robert Strawbridge began the work a few years earlier in Maryland.] We can trace our American Methodist heritage back to the fall of 1735, when General James Oglethorpe, founder of the colony of Georgia, made known his need for a clergyman in his American settlement. John Wesley was the answer to this need. Thus, he sailed from Gravesend, England, in October of that same year. When John arrived in America in February of 1736, accompanied by his brother Charles, he made a very auspicious beginning. The people looked forward to the blessings of an ordained ministry, and Wesley had great anticipation of converting many Indians in the immediate area of the infant colony. But time proved this enthusiasm to be transitory, and within the period of one year John Wesley returned to England a discouraged and disheartened man, realizing that he didn’t possess the very gift that he had hoped to give. Yet when his successor George Whitefield came onto the American scene, he was led to make this statement: “The good John Wesley has done in America is inexpressible. His name is very precious among the people, and he has laid a foundation that I hope neither man nor devils will ever be able to shake.” And so one disheartened, weary and undone John Wesley struck the spark which strangely warmed the hearts of people now some ten million strong.
    [Show full text]
  • Captain Thomas Webb
    WESLEYAN HERITAGE Library Biographies CAPTAIN THOMAS WEBB Compiled By Rev. Duane Maxey “Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord” Heb 12:14 Spreading Scriptural Holiness to the World Wesleyan Heritage Publications © 1997, 1998 CAPTAIN THOMAS WEBB The First Apostle of American Methodism Compiled and Edited By Duane V. Maxey From the writings of: Nathan Bangs in "A History of the Methodist Episcopal Church," Abel Stevens in "History of the Methodist Episcopal Church," and Matthew Simpson in "Cyclopaedia of Methodism" CAPTAIN THOMAS WEBB The First Apostle of American Methodism Compiled and Edited By Duane V. Maxey The First Apostle of American Methodism Francis Asbury was the key human instrument used of God for the early spread and organization of Methodism in America. Stirred by that pious "Mother in Israel," Barbara Heck, Philip Embury became the pastor of the first Methodist Society in America, and his John Street Church was soon after followed by the Log Meeting-house of Robert Strawbridge. Thus, Barbara Heck, Philip Embury, and Robert Strawbridge were very much involved in the planting of Methodism in America. However, the recognition of being the primary human instrument in the planting of Methodism on this continent should, perhaps, go to Captain Thomas Webb. He, it appears, can be accurately called: "The First Apostle of American Methodism." Methodist historian Abel Stevens says: "To Embury unquestionably belongs chronological precedence, by a few months, as the founder of American Methodism, but to Webb belongs the honor of a more prominent agency in the great event; of more extensive and more effective services; of the outspread of the denomination into Long Island, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware; the erection of its first chapels, and the introduction of Wesleyan itinerants.
    [Show full text]
  • 1966 Historical Papers Presented at American Methodism's
    FOREVER BEGINNING 1766 - 1966 Historical Papers presented at American Methodism's Bicentennial Celebration Baltimore, Maryland April 21 - 24, 1966 Published and Copyrighted by Association of Methodist Historical Societies Lake Junaluska, North Carolina Bishop T. Otto Nall, President Albea Godbold, Executive Secretary and Editor 1967 THE LAY PIONEERS OF AMERICAN METHODISM by Frank Baker American Methodism began in England before 1766, and it is there­ fore fitting that we should study our lay pioneers of 1766-1769 against the background of earlier Methodist laymen. During the winter of 1711-12, over 250 years ago, the father of the Wesleys was in London fulfilling his duties as a men1ber of the Convocation of the Church of England, leaving a somewhat ineffective curate in charge of the parish of Epworth. Susanna Wesley not only conducted prayers and read sermons for her own large family, but threw open her home for as many of the parishioners as wished to crowd into her kitchen. On occasion as many as 200 assembl ed on Sunday evenings, most of them standing a11 the time. Others cou ld not get in and decided to come earlier the next time. The jealous curate complained to the Rev. Samuel Wesley that his wife was turning the parsonage into a dissenting meeting house. She herself, indeed, spoke of the 11 11 gathering as our society • Samuel Wesley wrote asking her to desist. She refused to do so unless he expressly commanded it - as a good seventeenth century bride she had promised to obey her husband, and was indeed prepared to do so .
    [Show full text]
  • In New Yorlt by Samuel J
    Philip Embury, Founder of l\1:ethodism in New Yorlt by Samuel J. Fanning 1\nETHODISM will officially celebrate the Two Hundredth An­ J.a' 1 niversary of the founding of the first Methodist societies (churches) in America in 1966..As this significant anniversary ap­ proaches, there may be some question as to just when Robert Straw­ bridge organized his first l\1ethodist society in Maryland, but all agree that Philip Embury established Methodism in New York City in 1766. Philip Embury, an ethnic German, was born in County Limerick, Ireland, in 1728 and emigrated to New York in 1760. Embury is the anglicized version of the German name Emmerich. To explain Embury's birth and early life in Ireland, it is necessary to note brief­ ly conditions on the continent of Europe in the latter part of the seventeenth century. France under King Louis XIV was the greatest power in Europe. Louis ascended the throne in 1661 follo\iVing the death of his great mentor, Cardinal IV[azarin. Before his passing, the adroit cardinal had sn1ashed the power of the nobility in France; Colbert worked wonders for the country's finances; and Louvois was providing Louis with the largest and best trained army Europe had seen since the days of the Roman Empire..AJI of this set the stage for Louis to indulge his inordinate passion for "military fame, beside which every other kind of reputation seemed to him to be of little value." 1 Between 1667 and the close of his reign in 1715, Louis' armies fought four wars for the sole purpose of expanding the borders of France.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Church of the United Brethren in Christ, Virginia Conference by A
    Abram Paul Funkhouser HISTORY OF THE CHURCH OF THE UNITED BRETHREN IN CHRIST VIRGINIA CONFERENCE BY REV. A. P. FUNKHOUSER, A. M., D. D. COMPILED BY OREN F. MORTON, B. Lit. Author of "Under the Cottonwoods," "Winning or Losing?" "Land of the Laurel," "A Practical History of Music," "The Story of Daniel Boone," "A History of Preston County, W. Va.," "A History of Pendleton County, W. Va.," "A History of Highland County, W. Va..," "A History of Rockbridge County," "Annals of Bath County, Va." Dr. Funkhouser died before the work was completed. The material gathered and the language used by the Author has been carefully preserved by the Compiler. The Virginia Conference ordered the publication of this History and appointed Drs. A. S. Hammock, W. F. Gruver, J. H. Brunk, Rev. J N. Fries, Mr. W. I. Good and J. K. Ruebush as a committee on publication. We present to the Church this History which we regard as of the the greatest value to the church, not only of to-day but for the future. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I. Apostolic Christianity before Otterbein II. William Otterbein and the German Reformed Church III. Martin Boehm and the Mennonites IV. German Immigration in the Eighteenth Century V. The Evangelical Movement among the German Immigrants VI. Early Years of the Church VII. Planting the Church in Virginia VIII. Extracts from Newcomer's Journal IX. The Early Preachers X. Reminiscences of Some of the Early Preachers XI. The Transition from German to English XII. The Church in the War of 1861 XIII. The Church in Recent Times XIV.
    [Show full text]
  • HERITAGE 2000 This Slideshow Is in Adobe Acrobat “PDF” Format
    HERITAGE 2000 This slideshow is in Adobe Acrobat “PDF” format. You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader in order to view this slideshow. It is available from www.adobe.com. We recommend using the most recent version available from Adobe. In normal PDF viewing format, use the page forward / backward arrows at the top of the page to advance to the next slide or review a previous slide. If you wish to view in full page view, you must first download the slide-show to your pc, then open it in Adobe and click on “View”, then on “Full Screen Mode”. You may then left-click to advance to the next slide, or right-click to review a previous slide. The cursor need not be visible to you for this to work; however, it should appear as a small hand. We recommend the full screen mode. Download and switch to the “Full Screen Mode” now. To end the slideshow, press the “Esc” button on your keyboard. HERITAGE 2000 Welcome to Heritage 2000, a pictorial history of the growth of Methodism through the years. This presentation was originally displayed on April 30, 2000 in the fellowship hall of Geneva United Methodist Church, Geneva, Ohio, as part of the Heritage Sunday celebration for the new century. Please note that the presentation is in more of a subjective than chronological order. Our heritage tour begins with the posting of Martin Luther’s 95 Theses on the door of the chapel at Wittenberg. This was the start of the Protestant Reformation. While we tend to think of the Church of England as a result of the Protestant Reformation, its formation is more accurately called the “English Reformation.” MARTIN LUTHER Augustinian Monk and Roman Catholic Priest Luther is attributed with starting the Protestant Reformation when he posted his “95 Theses” to the door of the chapel at Wittenberg.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Central Pennsylvania Methodism: from Whitefield to Asbury by Charles Berkheimer, 1968
    Early Central Pennsylvania Methodism: from Whitefield to Asbury by Charles Berkheimer, 1968 Editor’s note: This was a major document in progress at the time of Dr. Berkheimer’s death, and not an article ready for publication. To keep the flow of the paper, some of the author’s “tangents” have been converted to footnotes. Footnotes added by the editor, that were not part of the original manuscript, conclude with “-ed.” Otherwise, the material is presented as prepared by Dr. Berkheimer in 1968 and preserved in the conference archives with his other research notes. Covering the origins of Methodism in Central Pennsylvania in a single paper is a difficult assignment. Now that the Northern Tier of counties previously served from New York and several southern charges previously served by the Baltimore Conference have been placed within our boundaries, the paper must also include material not previously found within our historical collections. My approach shall be to present the introduction of Methodism into Central Pennsyl- vania in broad terms, and then to discuss the expansion of the work and the creation of smaller circuits year-by-year beginning in 1789 and continuing until the death of Asbury in 1816. This paper, then, shall concentrate on the develop- ment of the circuits. Treatments of camp meetings, Sunday Schools, contro- versies, conference agencies and the like must wait for another time. George Whitefield The title “Methodist” is now borne with honor by the spiritual descendants of John and Charles Wesley, but it was not conferred at first as an honorable one at all.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Embury Family Collection 1728-1943
    Guide to the Embury Family Collection 1728-1943 Published for Drew University Methodist Library by General Commission on Archives and History of the United Methodist Church P.O. Box 127, Madison, NJ 07940 3/18/2004 Guide to the Embury Family Collection Embury Family Collection 1728-1943 1.72 cu. feet drew.ms.2764 The purpose of this finding aid is to help you understand the nature of this collection and to assist you in the retrieval of material from this collection. The following pages contain a brief biographical history of the person, or persons, who created or collected these papers, followed by a general description of the collection in the scope and content note. If more detailed information is warranted then series descriptions also appear. The container listing appears last and is the listing of material in each box, or container, of this collection. To request material you need to turn to the container listing section. It is essentially a listing of file folders, or artifact items, in the collection. Each folder, or item, has a call number associated with it. Each folder also lists the inclusive dates of the material in the folder. On the material request form list both the call number and the folder, or item, title. Use a different line for each folder, or item, requested. When your request sheet is complete, or full, bring it to the archivist and the material will be retrieved. Biographical Note Philip Embury (1728-1775) was the founder of John Street Church in New York City. He was born in Ballingrane, County Limerick, Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of the Churches the PRESBYTERIANS
    The Story of the Churches The Methodists By JOHN ALFRED FAULKNER, D. D. Professor of Historical Theology in Drew Theological Seminary. NEW YORK: THE BAKER & TAYLOR CO. 33-37 EAST SEVENTEENTH ST., UNION SQ. NORTH Copyright, 1903, By THE BAKER & TAYLOR CO. Published, September, iqo3 Publishers' Note The aim of this series is to furnish a uniform set of church histories, brief but complete, and designed to instruct the average church member in the origin, development, and his­ tory of the various denominations. Many church histories have been issued for all de­ nominations, but they have usually been volumes of such size as to discourage any but students of church history. Each vol­ ume of this series, all of which will be written by leading historians of the various denominations, will not only interest the members of the denomination about which it is written, but will prove interesting to members of other denominations as well who wish to learn something of their fellow workers. The volumes will be bound uni­ formly, and when the series is complete will make a most valuable history of the Chris­ tian church. Contents CH.iP. PAGB I. THE EISE OF METHODISM 7 II. THE MEANING OF METHODISM 22 III, THE PLANTING IN AMEBICA 37 IV. THE FIEST CONFEEENCES 54 V. THE OEGANIZATION OF THE CHUECH . 81 VI. EIGHTEENTH CENTUBY HEEOES .... 104 VII. TEEKITOEIAL EXPANSION 141 VIII. A MOTHEB OF CHUECHES 160 IX. CANADA 179 X. EDUCATION 199 XI. " THE WOELD IS MY PAEISH " . 224 STATISTICS 247 LITEEATUBE 250 INDEX 259 The Methodists CHAPTER I THE RISE OF METHODISM THE Methodist movement was the provi­ dential response to the moral and spiritual destitution of England.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Footsteps of Our Irish Palatine Ancestors
    In the Footsteps of our Irish Palatine Ancestors 11 days: September 13-23, 2018 New York State and Québec Includes: 11 days: September 13-23, 2018 • Luxury motor coach transportation • Admission to Fort Ticonderoga • 10 nights accommodation & Crown Point • 10 breakfasts • Domaine du Ridge Winery Tour • 4 lunches • Admission to Missisquoi Museum • 10 dinners • Ferry to Grosse Île Come with us on this grand sightseeing tour and see it all! • Admission to 9/11 Memorial • Services of a Tour Director • NYC guided tour • All gratuities and applicable taxes • Ticket to Broadway show • Historical tour of Bennington Battlefield, $3785 Twin $3675 Triple Saratoga Battlefield & Saratoga Monument $3565 Quad $5285 Single Grosse Île Irish Monument Philipsburg Methodist Church Old Methodist Cemetery To book, contact Great Canadian Holidays: 519 896 8687 or 1 800 461 8687 ext. 280 Sponsored by the Irish Palatine Special Interest Tour Notes: Please refer to the Terms and Conditions as outlined in the General Information section of our current catalogue (available on request). We recommend that Group of the Ontario Genealogical Society. everyone have travel insurance, especially when travelling outside of Canada. A deposit is required at the time of booking an overnight tour in order to guarantee the reservation.Travel arrangements made by: Great Canadian Holidays Inc., 353 Manitou Drive, Kitchener, ON N2C 1L5 TICO# 2280154 PLEASE NOTE: A valid passport is required for entry into the United States. www.GreatCanadianHolidays.com www.GreatCanadianHolidays.com Montréal cityscape New York City Day One: Our tour begins in the vibrant city of lunch, we board the coach and travel to Saratoga and travel the route the Palatines and other Loyal- join an optional walking tour or continue to explore Montréal, our home for the night.
    [Show full text]