Trails Master Plan / Maintenance Access Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Trails Master Plan / Maintenance Access Plan FINAL REPORT Maintenance Access and Trails Master Plan Southern Sandoval County Arroyo Flood Control Authority June 2018 This page intentionally left blank ©2018 CDM Smith Inc. All Rights Reserved PW_PL1\Documents\153753\221257\03 Reports and Studies\01 Studies and Planning\Trails Master Plan Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1‐1 1.1 Vision Statement ....................................................................................................................................................... 1‐1 1.2 Goals ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1‐1 1.3 Benefits ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1‐2 1.4 Consistency with Quality of Life Plan ............................................................................................................... 1‐2 Section 2 Existing Trails Network ....................................................................................... 2‐1 2.1 Setting ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2‐1 2.1.1 SSCAFCA Jurisdictional Area .................................................................................................................. 2‐1 2.1.2 Lateral Erosion Envelope ........................................................................................................................ 2‐1 2.2 Existing Trails ............................................................................................................................................................. 2‐2 2.2.1 SSCAFCA .......................................................................................................................................................... 2‐2 2.2.2 City of Rio Rancho ....................................................................................................................................... 2‐2 2.2.3 Village of Corrales ....................................................................................................................................... 2‐2 2.2.4 City of Albuquerque ................................................................................................................................. 2‐13 2.2.5 Bernalillo County....................................................................................................................................... 2‐13 2.3 Future Trails ............................................................................................................................................................. 2‐13 2.3.1 Mid‐Region Council of Governments ................................................................................................ 2‐13 2.3.2 Lisbon Channel and Multi‐Use Trail .................................................................................................. 2‐13 Section 3 Proposed Trails Network .................................................................................... 3‐1 3.1 User Group Type ....................................................................................................................................................... 3‐1 3.1.1 Pedestrian ...................................................................................................................................................... 3‐1 3.1.2 Bicycling .......................................................................................................................................................... 3‐1 3.1.3 Equestrian ...................................................................................................................................................... 3‐2 3.1.4 Off‐Road Vehicle .......................................................................................................................................... 3‐2 3.2 Trail Analysis .............................................................................................................................................................. 3‐3 3.2.1 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................... 3‐3 3.2.2 Right‐of‐Way ................................................................................................................................................. 3‐3 3.2.3 Nodal and Trail Connections .................................................................................................................. 3‐3 3.3 Proposed Trails.......................................................................................................................................................... 3‐4 3.3.1 Outer Loop Trail ........................................................................................................................................ 3‐15 3.3.2 Venada Watershed Park Trail .............................................................................................................. 3‐15 3.3.3 Zia Watershed Park Trail ....................................................................................................................... 3‐15 3.3.4 Coronado Watershed Park Trail ......................................................................................................... 3‐15 3.3.5 Arroyo de la Barranca Trail .................................................................................................................. 3‐15 3.3.6 Arroyo de las Lomitas Negras Trail ................................................................................................... 3‐16 3.3.7 Arroyo de los Montoyas Trail .............................................................................................................. 3‐16 3.3.8 Corrales Acequia ........................................................................................................................................ 3‐16 3.3.9 Snead Channel ............................................................................................................................................ 3‐16 3.3.10 Lisbon Channel ........................................................................................................................................ 3‐16 i ©2018 CDM Smith Inc. All Rights Reserved PW_PL1\Documents\153753\221257\03 Reports and Studies\01 Studies and Planning\Trails Master Plan Table of Contents Section 4 Design Guidelines ............................................................................................... 4‐1 4.1 Trail Surface ................................................................................................................................................................ 4‐1 4.1.1 Soft Material .................................................................................................................................................. 4‐1 4.1.1.1 Native soil ......................................................................................................................................... 4‐1 4.1.1.2 Crusher Fines .................................................................................................................................. 4‐2 4.1.1.3 Gravel .................................................................................................................................................. 4‐2 4.1.2 Hard Material ................................................................................................................................................ 4‐2 4.1.2.1 Paved ................................................................................................................................................... 4‐2 4.1.2.2 Stabilized Soil .................................................................................................................................. 4‐2 4.1.2.3 Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement ................................................................................................... 4‐3 4.1.3 Selection Criteria ......................................................................................................................................... 4‐3 4.2 Accessibility ................................................................................................................................................................. 4‐4 4.2.1 Surface Material ........................................................................................................................................... 4‐5 4.2.2 Slope .................................................................................................................................................................. 4‐5 4.3 Crossings ....................................................................................................................................................................... 4‐6 4.3.1 Grade‐separated Crossings ..................................................................................................................... 4‐6 4.3.1.1 Underpass ........................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • A Thousand Years of Irrigation in Tucson, Ancient Canals, Cienega
    ARCHAEOLOGY IN TUCSON Vol. 9, No. 4 Newsletter of the Center for Desert Archaeology Fall 1995 A Thousand Years of Irrigation in Tucson by Jonathan B. Mabry and J. Homer Thiel, Center for Desert Archaeology Historical photographs, newspaper accounts, and the memories of town elders tell us that the Santa Cruz River flowed through Tucson year- round across a wide flood- plain that held irrigated fields of wheat, alfalfa, cotton, and vegetables as recently as 100 years ago. These same sources describe how, at the turn of the century, a com- bination of ill-designed diver- sion ditches, a declining water table due to overgrazing and over-pumping, and a series of unusually large floods resulted in the entrenched riverbed we see today. Based on recent archae- ological evidence, we now know that this also represent- ed the end of at least a thou- View of Tucson from Sentinel Peak ("A" Mountain) during the late nineteenth century. The Santa Cruz River sand years of continuous irri- flowed year-round between irrigated fields on both sides of the floodplain. The river became entrenched by the gated agriculture in the 1890s due to a combination of human and natural factors, making gravity irrigation no longer possible. Left of middle Santa Cruz Valley. center are the adobe ruins of the San Agustin mission visita (photo no. 12649 courtesy of the Arizona Over the last two decades—but Historical Society). mostly within the last year— Archaeologists working in the floodplain of the Santa Cruz River (a temporary abandonment of fields) was necessary to prevent in Tucson have found many preserved remnants of prehistoric salinization and restore soil fertility.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Democracies on the Upper Rio Grande, 1598-1998
    Water Democracies on the Upper Rio Grande, 1598-1998 José A. Rivera Abstract—The acequia irrigation systems of northcentral New itself built on a partially abandoned Tewa Pueblo. Here, Mexico and southern Colorado are the oldest, continuously func- too, one of the first tasks of the Oñate party was to construct tioning water management institutions in the United States. For a an irrigation ditch sufficient to support the expansion of period of four hundred years, 1598-1998, the acequias have sus- cultivated fields essential for the permanent occupation of tained the agropastoral economies of the region while protecting the the Spanish colony (Baxter 1997). San Gabriel (now known watershed resources on which downstream water stakeholders as Chamita) remained as the capital of the fledgling province depend. The acequia customs of sharing and system of self-govern- throughout Oñate’s term as governor. In 1610 a subsequent ment provide a framework for sustainable resource use into the governor, Pedro de Peralta, moved the capital to a more twenty-first century in a time of changing and often conflictive strategic location at Santa Fe, where once again, the con- values. Continuance of these traditional institutions, however, struction of a municipal irrigation system was a primary and depends on how successfully they adapt to the new realities of the early public works project. Two acequia madres (main canals) emerging water markets in the region. were dug to irrigate fields on both sides of the Río de Santa Fe, the river that passed through the center of the new and permanent capital city (Simmons 1972; Twitchell 1925).
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Acequia Handbook
    Colorado Acequia Handbook Water Rights and Governance Guide for Colorado’s Acequias (Revised 2019) Photo courtesy of Devon Pena Editors Jens Jensen, Wellborn, Sullivan, Meck & Tooley Peter Nichols, Berg Hill Greenleaf & Ruscitti, LLP Ryan Golten, CDR Associates Sarah Krakoff, University of Colorado Law School Sarah Parmar, Colorado Open Lands Karl Kumli, Dietze & Davis, PC Jesse Heibel, University of Colorado Law School Gregor MacGregor, University of Colorado Law School The Purpose of this Handbook is to provide general information to acequias (irrigation ditches) in Costilla, Conejos, Huerfano and Los Animas Counties. This handbook is not intended to provide legal advice. Made possible with generous support from: This handbook is a joint effort of the Sangre de Cristo Acequia Association, the Getches- Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment at the University of Colorado Law School, Colorado Open Lands, and dedicated private attorneys. The handbook was inspired by the New Mexico Acequia Association’s Acequia Governance Handbook, which served as a wonderful model. The handbook represents the work of law student volunteers at the University of Colorado Law School, with supervision and guidance from Colorado law professors and attorneys. Student contributors to the content of this handbook were: Blake Busse Karoline Garren Julia Guarino, Getches-Wyss Fellow Megan Gutwein Cori Hach Melissa S. Jensen Shannon Liston Gunnar Paulsen Nate Miller John R. Sherman Dan Weiss Michael Weissman Emily Neiley Gregor MacGregor 2 Disclaimer The information provided in this Handbook is for informational purposes only and is intended solely as informal guidance. It is not a determination of your legal rights or your responsibilities under the law.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUNDS LIKE a PLAN the Official Newsletter of APA New Mexico
    Winter 2019-2020 JANUARY 2020 SOUNDS LIKE A PLAN The Official Newsletter of APA New Mexico Our Year In Review IN THIS ISSUE On behalf of the Board of the American Planning WHO WE ARE - Association—New Mexico Chapter, it is our pleasure CHAPTER OVERVIEW to present this Annual Report and Winter Newsletter PAGE 2 to our Membership. The Chapter capped off a busy year by co-hosting the annual confer- FINANCIAL REPORT & ence together with our partner Western Planner (please see article on page 6 for more details on the conference). STRATEGIC PLAN PAGE 4 At the end of the year, the Chapter supported the nomination of three distinguished members to the College of Fellows of the AICP: Dale Dekker, AICP; Phyllis Taylor, AICP; and Kizito Wijenje, AICP. WESTERN PLANNER RECAP Behind the scenes, our Treasurer has been working hard on taxes and PAGE 6 working on our non-profit incorporation, which will facilitate easier chapter management in the future. Also, look for us to roll out a new Chapter website by mid-February, 2020, once we deal with some ran- 2019 CHAPTER som-ware issues. AWARDS In between, we also participated in UNM-APA’s annual Meet the PAGE 8 Planners Event, which allows future planners to network with practic- ing planning professionals. In addition, last spring, we partnered with our allied professionals in architecture, engineering, and landscape PLANNER SPOTLIGHT: architecture for a multi-disciplinary professional mixer. LUCY FOMA! We have divided the rest of this Annual Report/Newsletter into two PAGE 10 sections: the first three pages provide an overview of the Chapter’s demographics, financials, and 2019-2020 Strategic Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hallett Decrees and Acequia Water Rights Administration on Rio Culebra in Colorado
    The Hallett Decrees and Acequia Water Rights Administration on Rio Culebra in Colorado Will Davidson* & Julia Guarino† * J.D., University of Colorado Law School. † Getches Fellow, Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment; J.D., University of Colorado Law School. The authors would like to express their sincere thanks for the many hours of invaluable brainstorming and written comments provided by the pro bono attorneys and volunteers for the Acequia Assistance Project: Allan Beezley and Marie Vicek of Allan Beezley, P.C.; Professor Sarah Krakoff, Acequia Project supervisor at the University of Colorado Law School; Peter Nichols and Leah Martinsson of Berg, Hill, Greenleaf, Ruscitti; and Sarah Parmar of Colorado Open Lands. The authors would also like to thank the other individuals who generously provided feedback on drafts of the article: Craig Cotten, Division Engineer, Water Division 3; Professor Amy Griffin of University of Colorado Law School; Preston Hartman, Assistant Attorney General, Colorado; Professor Gregory Hicks of University of Washington Law School; Sr. Judge O. John Kuenhold; Larry MacDonnell, of counsel, Porzak Browning and Bushong; and John McClure, McClure & Eggleston LLC. The authors also wish to thank Colorado Supreme Court Justice Gregory Hobbs for his support of the Acequia Project, and for taking the time to read a draft of this Article. 220 Colo. Nat. Resources, Energy & Envtl. L. Rev. [Vol. 26:2 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 222 II. THE HISTORY AND EFFECTS OF THE HALLETT DECREES ................ 224 A. Non-Indigenous Settlement in the Rio Culebra Watershed ........................................................................... 225 B. Colorado Water Law and the 1889 General Stream Adjudication ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Mexico State Page 2020
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Community Assistance Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program New Mexico News A mesa at San Ildefonso Pueblo Photo Credit: MARELBU courtesy of Wikimedia Commons 2020 PROJECTS The National Park Service Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance (RTCA) program supports nonprofit organizations, community groups, tribes, and local, state, and federal government agencies. We help partners work together to create parks, develop trails and greenways, protect rivers and natural areas, and increase access to recreation opportunities. We help you engage a wide range of 5 2 community partners and also work to connect you to National Park Service (NPS) managed areas. 1 The RTCA program in New Mexico offers a wide range of services that can be tailored to meet the needs of an individual project. The NPS staff members are trained facilitators who 3 encourage project leaders to build collaborative partnerships among governmental and non-governmental stakeholders. We help communities and groups define their vision, goals, and objectives; analyze issues and opportunities; and develop 4 strategic action plans and time lines for projects. We do not 6 provide financial assistance, but can help project partners identify 7 and secure sources of funding and technical support. Find out more about how the National Park Service is supporting projects in New Mexico on the next page. CURRENT PROJECTS 1. Tucumcari Five Mile Park 2. Crownpoint Pathways 3. Rio Grande Trail - Socorro Valley Segment 4. Truth or Consequences Trails & River Access 5. San Ildefonso Pueblo Trails 6. Western New Mexico Internship Collaborative 7. NPS Visitation and Tourism Strategy in New Mexico View of the Rio Grande Trail - Socorro Valley Segment area.
    [Show full text]
  • \Ryhereas, the Valencia County Commission Met Upon Notice of Meeting Duly Published on April 17, 2019, at 5:00 P.M
    VALENCIA COUNTY BOÄRD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RESoLUTION IIþ 2019- s4l ADOPTION OF MIDDLE RIO GRANDE ECONOMIC DEYELOPMENT PLAN \ryHEREAS, the Valencia County Commission met upon notice of meeting duly published on April 17, 2019, at 5:00 P.M. in the Valencia County Administration Building, 444 Luna Avenue, Los Lunas, New Mexico 87031; and, IVHEREAS, NMSA 1978, Section4-37-l (1995) provides that Counties have the power to, "provide for the safety, preserve the health, promote the prosperity and improve the morals, order, comfort and convenience of any county or its inhabitants"; and, \ryHEREAS, NMSA, 1978, Section 4-38-18 (1976) provides thataBoard of County Commissioner has the duty and authority "[t]o represent the county and have the care of the county property and the management of the interest of the county in all cases where no other provision is made by law; and, WHEREAS, the Middle Rio Grande Economic Development Association was formed amongst the members of Catron, Sierra, Socorro and Valencia Counties to develop the region into one that is both state and nationally competitive; and, WHEREAS, the MRGEDA identified those industries that are anticipated to provide the region with a competitive economic advantage, including (1) agriculture, (2) arts, entertainment, recreation, and visitor industries, (3) health care, (4) renewable energy and forest products, and (5) technology; and, IVHEREAS, in addition to articulating goals with respect to each of these sectors, the MRGEDA identified both detailed strategies and specifrc,target outcomes with respect to each sector that are designed to promote the prosperity of the region. NOIV, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Valencia by the authority granted the Board by the laws of the State of New Mexico and people of Valencia County, that the Board hereby adopts the20l6 Middle Rio Grande Economic Development Association's 2016 Economic Development Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 DRAFT Contents Rio Grande Trail Master Plan: Threading Partnerships
    Chapter 4 DRAFT Contents Rio Grande Trail Master Plan: Threading Partnerships ....................................................................................................... 3 Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Pursuing National Trail Designation ..................................................................................................................................... 4 inset box: .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 inset box: .............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 El Camino Real Historic Trail ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Continental Divide Trail .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Establishing a Governance Structure .................................................................................................................................... 5 Establish a Rio Grande Trail Nonprofit ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Open Spacespace
    OPENOPEN SPACESPACE newsletter Mayor Martin J. Chávez A Quarterly Newsletter of the Open Space Division and the Open Space Alliance Volume 6, Issue 4, October - December 2005 OPEN SPACE POLICE Still Dedicated to Open Space At the end of last year the Open Space With that change, please continue your vigi- Police (OSP) were absorbed into the Albuquer- lance on the trails and report any and all inci- que Police Department (APD). As a special unit dences that violate Open Space rules and regula- in APD administered by Captain Mike Castro and tions. Lieutenant Ruben Griego, the Open Space Police Please note that safety issues that require continue patrolling and responding to calls immediate attention will continue to be reported affecting Open Space properties and facilities. to Open Space Administrative Offices at 452-5206. Of course, there have been some changes. Thank you for your continued dedication to The OSP vehicles are now striped and marked in Open Space and happy trails! the APD tradition. You may see officers dressed in APD blue or bicycle black while others still sport the familiar tan and green. You may also encounter Open Space officers patrolling city parks, too. But does this affect you as a citizen or vol- unteer and the protocol for contacting the Open Space Division to report problems in Open Space? No. Except who you call to report prob- lems. Although Open Space Administrative Offices continue to maintain a dispatch unit for opera- Familiar faces: APD Open Space officers Luis Zamarron (L) and tions and maintenance, Open Space Police are George Gabaldon (R) now directly dispatched through APD.
    [Show full text]
  • De-Colonizing Water. Dispossession, Water Insecurity, and Indigenous Claims for Resources, Authority, and Territory
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) De-colonizing water Dispossession, water insecurity, and Indigenous claims for resources, authority, and territory Hidalgo Bastidas, J.P.; Boelens, R..; Vos, J. DOI 10.1007/s12685-016-0186-6 Publication date 2017 Document Version Final published version Published in Water History License CC BY Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Hidalgo Bastidas, J. P., Boelens, R., & Vos, J. (2017). De-colonizing water: Dispossession, water insecurity, and Indigenous claims for resources, authority, and territory. Water History, 9(1), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12685-016-0186-6 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:28 Sep 2021 Water Hist (2017) 9:67–85 DOI 10.1007/s12685-016-0186-6 De-colonizing water.
    [Show full text]
  • The History and Preservation of the Acequia Madre Del Río Pueblo
    The history and preservation of the Acequia del Madre del Río Pueblo, Taos, New Mexico A publication of The Paseo Project in support of the Friends of the Acequia Madre P | 1 The Paseo Project is excited to present Acequia Aquí: The history and preservation of the Acequia Madre del Río Pueblo. The essay and series of maps illuminate the deteriorating acequia network at the heart of the town of Taos. Through community collaborations, The Paseo Project seeks to educate, illuminate and support this historic and culturally important public infrastructure. Through this exploration, the Paseo Project seeks to transform our community by celebrating the downtown acequia network through creative and artistic events and installations. With the help of this booklet, we hope that you will better understand the history and value the acequia system has provided to our community and imagine with us new ways that we can celebrate the gift of their presence. – The Paseo Project Team table of contents: This project was made possible by the LOR Foundation essay: The Acequia Madre del Río Pueblo in the support of the Acquia Madre del Pueblo. by Sylvia Rodríguez. .1-6 faces of the acequia: Eloy Jeantete . 2 map of the Acequia Madre del Río Pueblo. 3 We’d like to give special thanks to the following people: Charles Chacon J.R. Logan Charles Chacon faces of the acequia: George Trujillo . .4 Jim Schlarbaum Gina Azzari Barbara Scott Sylvia Rodriguez Eloy Jeantete LOR Foundation map A | Acequia Madre del Juanita Lavadie George Trujillo Friends of the Acequia Madre Río Pueblo Headgate .
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Historic Resources.Pdf
    A Characterization of Historic Resources along Bridge Boulevard from Eighth Street to Coors Boulevard Bernalillo County, New Mexico DRAFT 2015 A Characterization of Historic Resources along Bridge Boulevard from Eighth Street to Coors Boulevard Bernalillo County, New Mexico Prepared for HDR Engineering 220 Adams Street SE, Suite A Albuquerque, NM 87108 By Van Citters: Historic Preservation, LLC Albuquerque, New Mexico Karen Van Citters, CSI, CDT Kathy Roxlau, RPA Bridge Boulevard Historic Resource Characterization Table of Contents PROJECT INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 2 GENERAL HISTORY ................................................................................................................. 4 Auto-Oriented Commercial Development .............................................................................. 9 Landscape Features ................................................................................................................ 12 Vernacular Architecture ........................................................................................................ 15 HISTORIC PROPERTIES ALONG THE BRIDGE STREET STUDY CORRIDOR ....... 17 RESOURCES REQUIRING SURVEY .................................................................................... 18 Phase 1: Tower Road .............................................................................................................. 18 Phase 2: Bridge from Old Coors to Goff Road ...................................................................
    [Show full text]