DOCSLIB.ORG

Politics and International Relations with a Grade of ‘C’ Or Better

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Politics and International Relations with a Grade of ‘C’ Or Better Undergraduate Catalog 2013-2014 College of Arts and Sciences 297 Politics and International Bachelor of Arts in International Relations Relations Degree Program Hours: 120 Rebecca Mae Salokar, Associate Professor and Chairperson Lower Division Preparation Iqbal Akhtar, Assistant Professor Students admitted to the university are admitted directly to Adrian Ang, Assistant Professor their chosen major. Students are expected to make good Astrid Arrarás, Senior Lecturer and Associate Director of progress based on critical indicators, such as GPA in Undergraduate Studies specific courses or credits earned. In cases where Kenneth Boodhoo, Professor Emeritus students are not making good progress, a change of major Thomas A. Breslin, Professor may be required. Advisors work to redirect students to John F. Clark, Professor more appropriate majors when critical indicators are not Danielle P. Clealand, Assistant Professor met. Ronald Cox, Associate Professor and Associate Chair Peter R. Craumer, Associate Professor Common Prerequisite Courses and Erin Kimball Damman, Assistant Professor Equivalencies Kathryn DePalo, Senior Lecturer FIU Course(s) Equivalent Course(s) Shlomi Dinar, Associate Professor and Associate None None Director, School of International and Public Affairs Courses which form part of the statewide articulation Kevin Evans, Assistant Professor between the State University System and the Florida Clement Fatovic, Associate Professor and Graduate College System will fulfill the Lower Division Common Program Director, Political Science Prerequisites. Eduardo Gamarra, Professor For generic course substitutions/equivalencies for Harry D. Gould, Associate Professor and Graduate Common Program Prerequisites offered at community Program Director, International Relations colleges, state colleges, or state universities, visit: Kevin Hill, Associate Professor http://www.flvc.org, See Common Prerequisite Manual. Tatiana Kostadinova, Associate Professor Paul Kowert, Associate Professor Common Prerequisites None Barry Levitt, Associate Professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies Required for the degree: Edward Loo, Diplomat in Residence INR 2001 Introduction to International Relations Charles MacDonald, Professor Emeritus Félix Martín, Associate Professor Upper Division Program Mohiaddin Mesbahi, Associate Professor and Director of International Relations majors must complete a minimum Middle East Studies Program 33 semester hours of course work in the department with Sara Moats, Instructor a grade of ‘C’ or better. Dario Moreno, Associate Professor Brian Nelson, Associate Professor Emeritus Core Requirement: (3) Richard S. Olson, Professor and Director of Extreme Take one of the following courses: Events Research GEA 2000 World Regional Geography Nicol Rae, Professor CPO 2002 Introduction to Comparative Politics Mark Rosenberg, Professor and University President REL 3308 Studies in World Religion John Stack, Professor and Director, School of SYP 3456 Societies of the World International and Public Affairs ECS 3003 Comparative Economic Systems Judith H. Stiehm, Professor WOH 2001 World Civilization Markus Thiel, Assistant Professor EVR 1017 Global Environment & Society Chantalle F. Verna, Associate Professor Group I Courses for the Major: (12) Jose Vilanova, Visiting Lecturer Sean Walsh, Instructor In addition to the Core Requirement, INR majors must Christopher Warren, Associate Professor take at least one course (3 sem. hrs.) from each of the Marcie Washington, Visiting Lecturer following divisions in Group I: Gregory B. Wolfe, Professor Emeritus Jin Zeng, Assistant Professor A. International Law/International Organizations (IL) Susanne Zwingel, Associate Professor B. Foreign Policy/Security Studies (FP) C. International Political Economy (IPE) D. A fourth course from among the following: 1). An Additional INR-prefixed Group I course 2). Comparative Politics courses CPO 3010 Comparative Politics: Theory and Practice CPO 3055 Authoritarians and Democrats CPO 4034 The Politics of Development & Underdevelopment 298 College of Arts and Sciences Undergraduate Catalog 2013-2014 CPO 4053 Political Repression & Human Rights ECS 3402 The Political Economy of South America CPO 4057 Political Violence and Revolution ECS 3403 Economics of Latin America CPO 4062 Comparative Judicial Politics ECS 3431 Economics of the Caribbean Basis CPO 4072 Comparative Electoral Behavior 4). Anthropology or Sociology courses CPO 4725 Comparative Genocide ANT 3780 Anthropology of Brazil CPO 4742 Comparative Political Economy ANT 4324 Mexico CPO 4930 Topics in Comparative Politics ANT 4332 Latin America 3). Economics courses ANT 4340 Cultures of the Caribbean Basin ECS 3021 Women, Culture, and Economic ANT 4352 African Peoples and Cultures Development SYD 3650 Sociology of Gender and Power in Asia ECO 4703 International Trade Theory and Policy SYD 4610 Japanese Society in Global Perspective ECO 4733 Multinational Corporation SYD 4630 Latin American and Caribbean Societies 4). Geography courses 5). Comparative Politics courses GEO 3001 Geography of Global Change CPO 3103 Politics of Western Europe GEO 3502 Economic Geography CPO 3204 African Politics GEO 3471 Political Geography CPO 3304 Politics of Latin America GEO 4354 Geography of the Global Food System CPO 3403 Politics of the Middle East GEO 4476 Political Ecology CPO 3643 Russian Politics GEO 4477 Critical Geopolitics CPO 4303 Politics of South America CPO 3423 Politics of the Caribbean 5). History courses CPO 4333 Politics of Central America EUH 3245 European History, 1914 – 1945 CPO 4340 Politics of Mexico EUH 3282 European History, 1945 – Present CPO 4360 Cuban Politics LAH 3718 History of US – Latin American CPO 4401 The Arab-Israeli Conflict Relations CPO 4461 Politics of Eastern Europe 6). Sociology and Anthropology courses CPO 4507 Comparative Political Economics of Asia ANT 4306 The Third World CPO 4541 Politics of China SYD 4237 Immigration & Refugees CPO 4553 Government and Politics of Japan SYP 4441 Sociology of World Development CPO 4955 Politics of the Czech Republic: Study SYP 4454 Globalization and Society Abroad Group II Courses for the Major: (12) 6). Environmental Studies course EVR 3402 Asian Environmental Issues INR majors must also take at least four courses (12 sem. hrs.) in Group II, including at least one from each of the Note: INR 4943 Internship in International Affairs can following divisions: count as the fourth Group II course as long as the student has completed one course from each of the three A. Area Studies (AS) divisions, above. B. Issues and Problems in International Relations (IP) C. Second AS or IP course Exit Requirements: (6) D. One course from among the following: INR 4013 Development of International 1. Geography courses Relations INR 4603 Theories of International Relations GEA 3320 Population and Geography of the Caribbean Electives GEA 3400 Population and Geography of Latin America Students are encouraged to double major or pursue a GEA 3500 Population and Geography of Europe minor in related fields such as political science, GEA 3554 Geography of Russia and Central Asia economics, geography, modern languages, history, GEA 3600 Population and Geography of Africa – sociology/anthropology, or business. We recommend that GL students take introductory courses in economics and gain GEA 3635 Population and Geography of the Middle fluency in at least one foreign language. Students may East also consider appropriate academic certificates such as GEA 3705 Geography of Central Asia and the those in Latin American and Caribbean Studies, Asian Caucasus Studies, African and African Diaspora Studies, and European Studies. 2). Religious Studies courses REL 3310 Introduction to Asian Religions Combined B.A. in International REL 3330 Religions of India REL 3362 Islamic Faith and Society Relations/M.A in International Studies REL 3375 Religions of the Caribbean The combined B.A./M.A. degree program allows highly REL 4370 African Religions qualified undergraduate students to pursue an accelerated 3). Economics courses M.A. degree in International Studies. Students accepted ECS 3200 Economics of Asia into this program will be able to complete the M.A. degree ECS 3401 The Brazilian Economy as much as one year sooner that would otherwise be Undergraduate Catalog 2013-2014 College of Arts and Sciences 299 possible. Students accepted into the International Students in the combined B.A./M.A. program in Relations Honors Track are particularly encouraged to International Studies must complete all other requirements apply for this program. for the M.A. degree in International Studies (please To be considered for admission to the combined consult the graduate catalog and the Politics and bachelor’s/master’s degree program, students must have International Relations Department’s online graduate completed at least 75-90 credits in the bachelor’s degree handbook. program at FIU and meet the admissions criteria for the graduate degree program to which they are applying. Minor in International Relations Students need only apply once to the combined degree program, but the application must be submitted to A student majoring in another academic discipline earns a Graduate Admissions before the student starts the last 30 Minor in International Relations by successfully completing credits of the bachelor’s degree program. A student approved course work of 18 semester hours in the admitted to the combined degree program will be Department of Politics and International Relations with a grade
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Contemporary Jurisprudence and International
    THE YALE LAW JO UR NA L VOLUME 61 MAY 1952 NUMBER 5 CONTEMPORARYJURISPRUDENCE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW* F.S. C.NORTHROPt WORLDsurvival and progress in an atomic epoch depends on an effective international law. Yet several recent students of the subject conclude that any further attempt to improve international relations by legal means is not merely unrealistic and impractical, but also likely to result in more harm than good. Is this to be the final verdict? The purpose of this inquiry is to answer this question by analyzing the major contemporary theories of jurisprudence and their bearing on international law. LEGAL POSITIVISM Legal positivism delimits the subject matter of law to the cases and proposi- tions in law books and to the legal institutions which apply those propositions. In domestic law this restriction of the law to the positive law has been found wanting. Dean Roscoe Pound's strictures against this "give-it-up" philosophy are well known.1 Justice Holmes' and Brandeis' pragmatic conception of law as a social instrument for facing and resolving social problems rather than running away from them is now a commonplace. Increasingly important is Myres McDougal's observation that not merely British legal positivism but also American legal realism leave one with a type of law which is incapable of meeting either the opportunities or responsibilities of the contemporary world.2 It has remained, however, for a legal positivist, P. E. Corbett, to give the final reductio ad absurdurn to such a system of jurisprudence in his Law and Society in the Relations of States.3 Consider, for example, the theory of auto-limitation introduced by Jellinek to account for legal obligation in international law.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Sociology in International Relations: Open Society, Research Programme and Vocation
    George Lawson Historical sociology in international relations: open society, research programme and vocation Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Lawson, George (2007) Historical sociology in international relations: open society, research programme and vocation. International politics, 44 (4). pp. 343-368. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800195 © 2007 Palgrave Macmillan This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/2742/ Available in LSE Research Online: August 2012 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final manuscript accepted version of the journal article, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer review process. Some differences between this version and the published version may remain. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Historical Sociology in International Relations: Open Society, Research Programme and Vocation Article for International Politics forum on Historical Sociology April 2006 Abstract Over the last twenty years, historical sociology has become an increasingly conspicuous part of the broader field of International Relations (IR) theory, with advocates making a series of interventions in subjects as diverse as the origins and varieties of international systems over time and place, to work on the co-constitutive relationship between the international realm and state-society relations in processes of radical change.
    [Show full text]
  • Is International Relations Relevant for International Money and Finance?
    Is International Relations Relevant for International Money and Finance? Thomas B. Pepinsky David A. Steinberg Department of Government Department of Political Science Cornell University University of Oregon [email protected] [email protected] FIRST DRAFT: August 5, 2014 THIS DRAFT: December 3, 2014 Is International Relations Relevant for International Money and Finance?* This paper investigates whether the discipline of international relations (IR) has contributed to international monetary and financial policy, and how it might do so more effectively. Using data from the Teaching, Research & International Policy (TRIP) surveys of policymakers, scholars, and academic journals, we show that IR research on money and finance remains a small fraction of all published IR research, and IR research on this issue rarely provides concrete policy prescriptions. This is unfortunate because scholars and policymakers agree that international money and finance are central concerns for contemporary policy. We suggest that the paucity of policy-oriented IR research on money and finance is largely a consequence of the relative success of economics in providing policymakers with the tools they need to understand economic policy problems, but that this is exacerbated by disciplinary incentives within the IR community. Increasing the policy relevance of academic IR research on money and finance will require changes to scholarly practice, and greater effort to capitalize on the complementarity of IR and economics. Although IR scholars have little influence
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Sociological Approach in International Relations
    Athens Journal of Social Sciences- Volume 7, Issue 2, April 2020 – Pages 123-130 Historical Sociological Approach in International Relations By Bihter Çelikdemir The aim of this study is to underline the importance of historical sociology for the discipline of International Relations and to suggest this research approach for the analysis of nation-state-building processes. Mainstream theories of International Relations, like neorealism and neoliberalism, argue that state behavior is determined by the international system (or structure). Since these theories attribute to the international system a key and determining role to understand state actions without having a state theory of their own, they fail to understand the transformations of the state throughout the history. In this article, it is argued that the discipline of International Relations should analyze the state and develop a theory of it. It is also argued that the way of achieving this goal is to historicize the state with a historical sociological approach. Keywords: Historical Sociology, International Relations, International System, Social Relations, Nation-State, Capitalism. Introduction With the establishment of the discipline of International Relations as a separate field of social sciences, history and sociology are treated as unrelated research areas, since the discipline relies upon the distinction between internal- external or local-international. Analyzing the local one - in other words the state and the society -is considered as the study field of sociology and history, whereas examining the international one is seen as the mission of International Relations (Yalvaç 1991, 2013). Mainstream theories of International Relations treat history as a material storage for the validation of their theories.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vitality of Sovereign Equallity Today Case Studies in Conservative and Progressive Legal Orders
    Fordham Law School FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History Faculty Scholarship 2004 International Law, International Relations Theory, and Preemptive War: The Vitality of Sovereign Equallity Today Case Studies in Conservative and Progressive Legal Orders Thomas H. Lee Fordham University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Thomas H. Lee, International Law, International Relations Theory, and Preemptive War: The Vitality of Sovereign Equallity Today Case Studies in Conservative and Progressive Legal Orders, 67 Law & Contemp. Probs. 147 (2004) Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/406 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTERNATIONAL LAW, INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY, AND PREEMPTIVE WAR: THE VITALITY OF SOVEREIGN EQUALITY TODAY THOMAS H. LEE* I INTRODUCTION The norm of sovereign equality in international law is so resolutely canonical' that its precise meaning, origins, and justifications are rarely examined. 2 Whatever the general merits of the norm, its retention seems fairly open to question when one sov- ereign state appears supremely unequal among 191 sovereign states' in terms of mili- Copyright © 2004 by Thomas H. Lee This Article is also available at http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/lcp. *Associate Professor, Fordham University School of Law. A.B., A.M., J.D., Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Government and International Relations
    POLITICAL SCIENCE DEPARTMENT HANDBOOK FOR STUDENTS Department Office Jefferson Academic Center, room 302 Phone: (508) 793-7155 EMAIL: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Undergraduate Academic Program . 1 Requirements for the Major . 2 Subfield Specialization Requirements . 3 General Requirements . 3 General Courses . 5 Subfield Specialization Options: I. American Politics & Public Policy . 5 II. Comparative Politics . 7 III. International Relations . 9 Grading for the Major . 10 Steps for Declaring the Major . 11 Doing an Interdisciplinary Concentration Along with the Major 11 Internships, Semester in Washington, and Study Abroad . 12 Honors in Political Science . 13 Other Honors, Awards, and Prizes . 15 Political Science Graduate School Advice . 17 Department Faculty . 18 Major Worksheet . 23 University Requirements for Graduation Checklist . 25 Requirements for the Minor . 25 Minor Worksheet . 25 Space for Notes . 26 UNDERGRADUATE ACADEMIC PROGRAM Why Choose Political Science as a Major? More than 75 years ago, Dr. Harold Lasswell, a prominent Political Science professor, wrote a fascinating book entitled Politics: Who Gets What, When, How? His book inspired other political scientists to ask another profoundly important question, namely: Why? Over the years, these questions have remained critically important. If you’re interested in exploring them in depth, then Political Science is the major for you. Studying politics involves examining the making of both conflict and consensus; learning what the stakes are; explaining why some groups gain access to the debate while others are left out; and how society as a whole is affected by political actions and inactions. Studying politics enables you to understand how consensus is reached on difficult questions; what can upset that consensus; and how new public debates get generated.
    [Show full text]
  • History Vs. Politics and International Relations
    A Clash of Narrative Styles? History vs. Politics and International Relations Andrew R. Hom University of Glasgow <DRAFT> Introduction Peter asked me to think about how I use history in my own work or how Politics and International Relations (PIR) relates to History. I’m still not sure about the first question,1 but what follows attempts an answer to the second based around my previous work on IR theory as a narrative enterprise (Hom 2016a, 2016b). Briefly, I argue that if we focus on the narratological aspects of both disciplines, there is not as much in the way of hard distinctions between History and PIR as is often thought. There are differences, but these are most often ones of degree or proportion in how various elements from a shared discursive toolkit are deployed. However, we can locate a more decisive disciplinary contrast in some seemingly obvious observations about how History and PIR self-consciously relate to time. This takes place over three sections. In the first, I compare the thematic and formal differences between the two and show how these do not sustain a disciplinary distinction. In the second, I do the same for how each discipline approaches the past or ‘uses history’, again highlighting exceptions to any hard core distinctions between the two. In the third and concluding section, I focus on each discipline’s self-understood vocational motivation, that is, the respective justifications for Historical or PIR research, in order to draw a more robust and durable distinction in terms of time. I argue that this distinction is what actually accounts for the other, more fluid differences and reflect briefly on the implications of temporal orientation for both History and PIR.
    [Show full text]
  • International Relations As a Social Science: Rigor and Relevance
    10.1177/0002716205276732THEINTERNATIONAL ANNALS OF THE RELATIONS AMERICAN AS A ACADEMY SOCIAL SCIENCE July600 Progress in the study of international politics depends on systematic, rigorous theory and empirical testing. Inter- national Relations is most useful when scholars can iden- tify with some confidence the causal forces that drive foreign policy and international interactions, not when they use their detailed empirical knowledge to offer opinions, however intelligent and well informed. Deter- rence theory, the democratic peace research program, and the political economy of trade policy demonstrate the importance of both theory and empirical research in International enhancing the understanding of international relations. The bargaining theory of war and open economy politics are the current frontiers of research on international Relations as a relations and promise even greater understanding in the Social Science: future. Keywords: deterrence; democracy; trade policy; war; Rigor and bargaining Relevance hen the American Academy of Political Wand Social Science published its first vol- ume in 1890, International Relations did not exist as an area of systematic inquiry.1 The By United States itself was only slowly awakening to JEFFRY A. FRIEDEN and the world beyond its borders. In contemplating DAVID A. LAKE the role this infant giant might play on the world stage, early thinkers on international relations simply extended the formal-legal approach that Jeffry A. Frieden is a professor of government at Harvard University. He received his Ph.D. from Columbia Uni- versity in 1984 and taught at UCLA for twelve years. He has published widely on international political economy, especially on the politics of international monetary and financial relations.
    [Show full text]
  • International Political Economy in an Age of Globalization Ngaire Woods
    N.Woods, IPE in an Age of Globalization, p.1 International Political Economy in an Age of Globalization Ngaire Woods (A final version of this paper appears as chapter 13 in John Baylis and Steve Smith (eds), The Globalization of World Politics, Oxford University Press, 2001, pp.277-298.) Acknowledgement: I would like to acknowledge the very helpful comments of Tim Barton (OUP), and Benno Teschke on an earlier draft of this chapter. • Introduction • The post-war world economy • The rise of IPE in the study of international relations • Traditional approaches to IPE • New approaches to IPE • The globalization debate in IPE • International institutions in a globalizing world economy • Conclusions READER’S GUIDE This chapter examines what drives actors and explains events in the international economy. The first section outlines the history of the post-war economy. The history helps to explain why and how international political economy (IPE) has become so central to the study of international relations (section two). Amidst the many actors, processes and events in the recent history of the world economy, it is not obvious where one might begin to analyse IPE. This task is made easier by three traditional approaches to IPE which outline for us specific actors, processes and levels of analysis. These are the liberal, mercantilist and marxist traditions which are outlined in section three. More recently, IPE has become divided by an argument about the uses (and abuses) of `rational choice’ analysis. What `rational choice’ means and the argument about how it should be used are both explored in section four.
    [Show full text]
  • International Law
    14 International Law Beth Simmons The study of international law and interna- foreshadowed the current sharp upswing in tional relations has flourished in the past interest in international law. Not only are decade. This should hardly be surprising. scholars increasingly interested in the grow- These two disciplines have closely entwined ing “legalization” of international affairs, historical roots in the traditional study of they are making tremendous strides in theo- interstate relations and diplomacy (Jeffery rizing and documenting the consequences of 2006). The role of international law in inter- international legal norms and agreements for national relations has for a least a century our understanding of international affairs been at the heart of some of the most impor- more generally. This has led to new fields of tant debates in international relations schol- inquiry in international relations that were arship. Something of an intellectual wedge barely apparent two decades ago. was driven between these two disciplines The first section of this essay defines a few when the social sciences and international key terms and provides some historical back- relations in particular took a behavioralist ground on the relationship between interna- turn in the 1940s and 1950s. The normative tional law and international relations. The and doctrinal approach of many legal schol- second section discusses the major theoreti- ars seemed to have little intersection with the cal approaches, from those that highlight increasingly social scientific concerns of material incentives to those that rest on more international relations scholars to explain, ideational foundations. The third section interpret, and increasingly to predict interna- discusses international law development – tional politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Science Undergraduate Program Fall 2018 Course Descriptions
    Political Science Undergraduate Program Fall 2018 Course Descriptions CRN Course ID Title Instructor Meeting Time(s) FRESHMEN COURSES 18903 10100 01 American Politics Joshua Kaplan MWF 11:30-12:20 fulfills American field requirement This course surveys the basic institutions and practices of American politics. The goal of the course is to gain a more systematic understanding of American politics that will help you become better informed and more articulate. The course examines the institutional and constitutional framework of American politics and identifies the key ideas needed to understand politics today. The reading and writing assignments have been designed not only to inform you, but also to help develop your analytic and research skills. The themes of the course include the logic and consequences of the separation of powers, the build-in biases of institutions and procedures, the origins and consequence of political reforms, and recent changes in American politics in the 21st century. This semester we will emphasize the significance of the upcoming 2016 elections, and the course will include election-related assignments. Although the course counts toward the Political Science major and will prepare prospective majors for further study of American politics, its primary aim is to introduce students of all backgrounds and interests to the information, ideas, and academic skills that will enable them to understand American politics better and help them become more thoughtful and responsible citizens. 12836 10200 01 International Relations Susan Pratt Rosato MW 10:30-11:20 fulfills International Relations field requirement This course provides an introduction to the study of international relations and will cover several theoretical approaches to and empirical issues in the field of IR.
    [Show full text]
  • An American Social Science: International Relations Author(S): Stanley Hoffmann Source: Daedalus, Vol
    An American Social Science: International Relations Author(s): Stanley Hoffmann Source: Daedalus, Vol. 106, No. 3, Discoveries and Interpretations: Studies in Contemporary Scholarship, Volume I (Summer, 1977), pp. 41-60 Published by: The MIT Press on behalf of American Academy of Arts & Sciences Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024493 Accessed: 08/09/2010 15:11 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=mitpress. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The MIT Press and American Academy of Arts & Sciences are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Daedalus.
    [Show full text]