DOCSLIB.ORG

An American Social Science: International Relations Author(S): Stanley Hoffmann Source: Daedalus, Vol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An American Social Science: International Relations Author(S): Stanley Hoffmann Source: Daedalus, Vol An American Social Science: International Relations Author(s): Stanley Hoffmann Source: Daedalus, Vol. 106, No. 3, Discoveries and Interpretations: Studies in Contemporary Scholarship, Volume I (Summer, 1977), pp. 41-60 Published by: The MIT Press on behalf of American Academy of Arts & Sciences Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024493 Accessed: 08/09/2010 15:11 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=mitpress. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The MIT Press and American Academy of Arts & Sciences are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Daedalus. http://www.jstor.org STANLEY HOFFMANN An American Social Science: International Relations In the past thirty international as a years, relations has developed largely autonomous of science. Even it part political though has shared many of politi? cal science's vicissitudes?battles among various orientations, theories, and a own. methods?it also has story of its What follows is an attempt at neither a nor a complete balance sheet capsule history?merely a set of reflections on the and frustrations of a specific accomplishments particular field of scholarship.l Only in America a Political science has much longer history than international relations. The at the attempt studying systematically patterns of conflict and cooperation alien actors?a among mutually shorthand definition of the subject matter?is recent. To be we can all trace our to sure, ancestry back Thucydides, just as scientists can trace to political theirs Aristotle. But Thucydides was a historian. He to be a historian of was was, sure, genius, rightly convinced that he writing for all times because he was one incident to a using particular describe per? manent of behavior. Yet he was to logic careful avoid explicit generalizations, "if . then" and or terms. propositions, analytic categories classificatory Modern and sociology political science emancipated themselves from political and social history, political philosophy, and public law in the nineteenth century. Inter? even national relations did not, though the kind of social (or asocial) action de? scribed never a by Thucydides disappeared from fragmented world, and flourished particularly in the period of the European balance of power. One can wonder this was so. After here was a realm why all, in which political philoso? phy had much less to offer than it did to those who wondered about the com? mon in the vast good domestic order. Except for the body of Roman Catholic literature preoccupied with just war, and not very relevant to a world of sover? there were the of eign states, only recipes Machiavelli; the marginal comments on the state international of nature in Hobbes', Locke's, and Rousseau's writ? some of two short and ings; pages Hume; tantalizing essays of Kant; compressed considerations by Hegel; and oversimplified fragments by Marx. Even so, the little that was available should political philosophy have been sufficiently pro? vocative to make students want to look into the realities. For the philosophers about the nature of the international milieu and disagreed the ways of making it 41 42 STANLEY HOFFMANN more bearable; and they wrote about the difference between a domestic order to a an stable enough afford search for the ideal state, and international contest in which order has to be established first, and which often clashes with any to aspiration justice. Similarly, the contrast between the precepts of law and the was realities of politics sufficiently greater in the international realm than in the to one want domestic realm, make to shift from the normative to the empirical, to if only in order understand better the plight of the normative. Without a one study of political relations, how could understand the fumblings and fail? ures or on of international law, the tormented debates the foundation of obliga? tion unconstrained common values or among sovereigns by superior power? not And the chaos of data provided by diplomatic history did require any less masses ordering than the of facts turned up by the history of states and societies. Why did a social science of international relations nevertheless fail to ap? answer to pear? The the discrepancy may well be found in that sweeping phe? as nomenon which Tocqueville identified the distinctive feature of the modern to ige: democratization. As domestic societies moved from their Old Regimes their modern conditions?parties and interests competing for the allegiance of large classes of citizens; the social mobilization of previously dispersed subjects; an he politics of large agglomerations and unified markets; increasingly univer? or sal suffrage; the rise of parliamentary institutions plebiscitar?an techniques; or the fall of fixed barriers, whether geographic social, within nations?the to study of flux began in earnest, if only in order provide concerned observers some and insecure officials with clues about regularities and predictions of somewhat less mythical, if also less sweeping nature than those grandiosely as strewn around by philosophers of history. With democratization, Comte had came was to own predicted, the age of positivism (his only mistake confuse his brand of metaphysics, or his grand speculations, with positive science). But or international politics remained the sport of kings, the preserve of cabinets? castes the last refuge of secrecy, the last domain of largely hereditary of diplo? mats, as Raymond Aron has characterized international relations the specialized activity of diplomats and soldiers. However, soldiers, to paraphrase Clausewitz, own own not an have their grammar but not their logic. It is accident if armies, of and having been democratized by the ordeals the French Revolution Napole? re? onic era, found their empirical grammarian in Clausewitz, whereas the still stricted club of statesmen and ambassadors playing with the fate of nations no to account found logician for its activities. Indeed, the historians who dealt with these succeeded only in keeping them beyond the pale of the kind of mod? was to at ern science that beginning look societies, by perpetuating the myth of to foreign policy's "primacy," isolated from domestic politics. There was, be one was sure, country in which foreign policy put under domestic checks and balances, knew no career caste, and paid little respect to the rules and rituals of coun? the initiated European happy few: the United States of America. But this contests were try happened to be remarkably uninvolved in the kinds of that the actors. daily fare of other Either it remained aloof, eager merely for continental or not consolidation and economic growth; else it expanded, by conflicts and at deals with equals, hut by short spurts of solipsistic exuberance the expense of much weaker neighbors. International relntions is the science of the tests and INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 43 trials of several intertwined actors. Where were no science they intertwined, grew. In the United States before the 1930s, there was no reason for it to grow. to It was only the twentieth century that brought democratization foreign to policy. Diplomatic issues moved from the calculations of the few the passions of the many, both because more states joined in the game that had been the preserve of a small number of (mainly European) actors and (mainly extra European) stakes, and above all because within many states parties and interests or across a established links pushed claims national borders. And yet, World War that saw the mobilization and slaughter of millions, marked the demise of as a the old diplomatic order, and ended kind of debate between Wilson and Lenin for the allegiance of mankind, brought forth little "scientific analysis" of international relations. Indeed, the rude intrusion of grand ideology into this a realm gave new lease of life to Utopian thinking, and delayed the advent of social science. Not "how it is, and why," but "how things should be improved, reformed, overhauled," was the order of the day. Old Liberal normative dreams were at same being licensed by the League of Nations covenant, while the time was the young Soviet Union calling for the abolition of diplomacy itself. It is against this reassertion of utopia, and particularly against the kind of "as a if thinking that mistook the savage world of the 1930s for community, the a a common League for modern Church, and collective security for duty, that E. H. Carr wrote the book which can be treated as the first "scientific" treat? a ment of modern world politics: Twenty Years Crisis2?the work of historian on to intent deflating the pretenses of Liberalism, and driven thereby laying the a a foundations both of discipline and of normative approach, "realism," that was to a are have quite future. Two paradoxes worth noting. This historian who was a founding social science, did it in reaction against another historian, whose not normative approach Carr deemed illusory?Toynbee, the philosopher of commentator the Study ofHistory, but the idealistic of the Royal Yearbook of Inter? national Affairs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How to Teach Political Science? Experience of First-Time University Teachers Is Meant to Start a Discussion of the Problems Involved with the ‘Do-It-Yourself’ Concept
    TEACHING POLITICAL SCIENCE SERIES No 1. How to Teach Political Science? The Experience of First-time University Teachers Edited by Gabriela Gregušová TEACHING POLITICAL SCIENCE SERIES NO 1. How to Teach Political Science? The Experience of First-time University Teachers Edited by Gabriela Gregušová Comenius University, Bratislava 2005 This publication results from work undertaken in the framework of the POLIS EPISTEME programme, which is supported by the European Commission. The POLIS EPISTEME Thematic Network – Enhancing Political Science Teaching Quality and Mobility in Europe – was conceived to help consolidate the European academic community of political scientists. It also aims to facilitate the adaptation of the discipline to the rapidly changing international and European higher education landscape. For more information about this project, please refer to: www.polis.uniroma2.it. This publication is also part of an epsNet publication series. The European Political Science Network (epsNet), launched in June 2001 in Paris, has been one of the major achievements of the EU-sponsored European Thematic Network in Political Science (1997 – 2001) and is a partner in the POLIS project. It has been joined by political scientists from Western, Central and Eastern Europe. Its major objectives are to foster cooperation in the field of teaching political science in Europe and to contribute to the advancement of the discipline on a European level. Its website is: www.epsnet.org. © Gabriela Gregušová and the authors, 2005 Published jointly by epsNet, University of Rome Tor Vergata and Sciences Po Paris POLIS EPISTEME European Political Sciences European Political Sciences European Office Network Network Università degli Studi di Roma General Secretariat Registered office "Tor Vergata" Central European University Sciences Po Paris (FNSP) Via Orazio Raimondo, 18 Nádor u.
    [Show full text]
  • Waltz's Theory of Theory
    WALTZ’S THEORY OF THEORY 201 Waltz’s Theory of Theory Ole Wæver Abstract Waltz’s 1979 book, Theory of International Politics, is the most infl uential in the history of the discipline. It worked its effects to a large extent through raising the bar for what counted as theoretical work, in effect reshaping not only realism but rivals like liberalism and refl ectivism. Yet, ironically, there has been little attention paid to Waltz’s very explicit and original arguments about the nature of theory. This article explores and explicates Waltz’s theory of theory. Central attention is paid to his defi nition of theory as ‘a picture, mentally formed’ and to the radical anti-empiricism and anti-positivism of his position. Followers and critics alike have treated Waltzian neorealism as if it was at bottom a formal proposition about cause–effect relations. The extreme case of Waltz being so victorious in the discipline, and yet being so consistently misinterpreted on the question of theory, shows the power of a dominant philosophy of science in US IR, and thus the challenge facing any ambitious theorising. The article suggests a possible movement of fronts away from the ‘fourth debate’ between rationalism and refl ectivism towards one of theory against empiricism. To help this new agenda, the article introduces a key literature from the philosophy of science about the structure of theory, and particularly about the way even natural science uses theory very differently from the way IR’s mainstream thinks it does – and much more like the way Waltz wants his theory to be used.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing Change in International Politics: the New Institutionalism and the Interpretative Approach
    Analyzing Change in International Politics: The New Institutionalism and the Interpretative Approach - Guest Lecture - Peter J. Katzenstein* 90/10 This discussion paper was presented as a guest lecture at the MPI für Gesellschaftsforschung, Köln, on April 5, 1990 Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Lothringer Str. 78 D-5000 Köln 1 Federal Republic of Germany MPIFG Discussion Paper 90/10 Telephone 0221/ 336050 ISSN 0933-5668 Fax 0221/ 3360555 November 1990 * Prof. Peter J. Katzenstein, Cornell University, Department of Government, McGraw Hall, Ithaca, N.Y. 14853, USA 2 MPIFG Discussion Paper 90/10 Abstract This paper argues that realism misinterprets change in the international system. Realism conceives of states as actors and international regimes as variables that affect national strategies. Alternatively, we can think of states as structures and regimes as part of the overall context in which interests are defined. States conceived as structures offer rich insights into the causes and consequences of international politics. And regimes conceived as a context in which interests are defined offer a broad perspective of the interaction between norms and interests in international politics. The paper concludes by suggesting that it may be time to forego an exclusive reliance on the Euro-centric, Western state system for the derivation of analytical categories. Instead we may benefit also from studying the historical experi- ence of Asian empires while developing analytical categories which may be useful for the analysis of current international developments. ***** In diesem Aufsatz wird argumentiert, daß der "realistische" Ansatz außenpo- litischer Theorie Wandel im internationalen System fehlinterpretiere. Dieser versteht Staaten als Akteure und internationale Regime als Variablen, die nationale Strategien beeinflussen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Present and the Future of Jurisprudence in the United States, 5 N.C
    NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW Volume 5 | Number 3 Article 1 4-1-1927 The rP esent and the Future of Jurisprudence in the United States Edward James Woodhouse Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Edward J. Woodhouse, The Present and the Future of Jurisprudence in the United States, 5 N.C. L. Rev. 197 (1927). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol5/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Law Review by an authorized administrator of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PRESENT AND THE FUTURE OF JURIS- PRUDENCE IN THE UNITED STATES EDWARD JAMES WOODHOUSE* Ignorance of Jurisprudence is one of the greatest weaknesses of this Nation. Jurisprudence is the Science of Law. All students of Jurisprudence are in as complete agreement on this general definition of their subject as they and all others using the terms are in disagree- ment and uncertainty in answering the next questions, namely, what is science and what is law. Workers in the Natural Sciences, espe- cially in those known as the Experimental or Laboratory Sciences, have resented and protested the use of the term Social Sciences to designate History, Economics, Political Science or Government or Politics, Sociology and allied studies, and have insisted upon known laws, certain and susceptible of objective and mathematical proof, predictability, possibility of experimentation or other characteristics as necessary to a real science.
    [Show full text]
  • A Philosophical and Historical Analysis of Cosmology from Copernicus to Newton
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2017 Scientific transformations: a philosophical and historical analysis of cosmology from Copernicus to Newton Manuel-Albert Castillo University of Central Florida Part of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Castillo, Manuel-Albert, "Scientific transformations: a philosophical and historical analysis of cosmology from Copernicus to Newton" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 5694. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/5694 SCIENTIFIC TRANSFORMATIONS: A PHILOSOPHICAL AND HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF COSMOLOGY FROM COPERNICUS TO NEWTON by MANUEL-ALBERT F. CASTILLO A.A., Valencia College, 2013 B.A., University of Central Florida, 2015 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the department of Interdisciplinary Studies in the College of Graduate Studies at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Fall Term 2017 Major Professor: Donald E. Jones ©2017 Manuel-Albert F. Castillo ii ABSTRACT The purpose of this thesis is to show a transformation around the scientific revolution from the sixteenth to seventeenth centuries against a Whig approach in which it still lingers in the history of science. I find the transformations of modern science through the cosmological models of Nicholas Copernicus, Johannes Kepler, Galileo Galilei and Isaac Newton.
    [Show full text]
  • Levels of Assessment: from the Student to the Institution, by Ross Miller and Andrea Leskes (2005)
    LEVELS of assessment From the Student to the Institution students»course»programBy Ross Miller and Andrea Leskes »institutions A Greater Expectations Publication LEVELS of assessment From the Student to the Institution By Ross Miller and Andrea Leskes Publications in AAC&U’s Greater Expectations Series Greater Expectations: A New Vision for Learning as Nation Goes to College (2002) Taking Responsibility for the Quality of the Baccalaureate Degree (2004) The Art and Science of Assessing General Education Outcomes, by Andrea Leskes and Barbara D. Wright (2005) General Education: A Self-Study Guide for Review and Assessment, by Andrea Leskes and Ross Miller (2005) General Education and Student Transfer: Fostering Intentionality and Coherence in State Systems, edited by Robert Shoenberg (2005) Levels of Assessment: From the Student to the Institution, by Ross Miller and Andrea Leskes (2005) Other Recent AAC&U Publications on General Education and Assessment Creating Shared Responsibility for General Education and Assessment, special issue of Peer Review, edited by David Tritelli (Fall 2004) General Education and the Assessment Reform Agenda, by Peter Ewell (2004) Our Students’ Best Work: A Framework for Accountability Worthy of Our Mission (2004) Advancing Liberal Education: Assessment Practices on Campus, by Michael Ferguson (2005) 1818 R Street, NW, Washington, DC 20009-1604 Copyright © 2005 by the Association of American Colleges and Universities. All rights reserved. ISBN 0-9763576-6-6 To order additional copies of this publication or to find out about other AAC&U publications, visit www.aacu.org, e-mail [email protected], or call 202.387.3760. This publication was made possible by a grant from Carnegie Corporation of New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Jurisprudence and International
    THE YALE LAW JO UR NA L VOLUME 61 MAY 1952 NUMBER 5 CONTEMPORARYJURISPRUDENCE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW* F.S. C.NORTHROPt WORLDsurvival and progress in an atomic epoch depends on an effective international law. Yet several recent students of the subject conclude that any further attempt to improve international relations by legal means is not merely unrealistic and impractical, but also likely to result in more harm than good. Is this to be the final verdict? The purpose of this inquiry is to answer this question by analyzing the major contemporary theories of jurisprudence and their bearing on international law. LEGAL POSITIVISM Legal positivism delimits the subject matter of law to the cases and proposi- tions in law books and to the legal institutions which apply those propositions. In domestic law this restriction of the law to the positive law has been found wanting. Dean Roscoe Pound's strictures against this "give-it-up" philosophy are well known.1 Justice Holmes' and Brandeis' pragmatic conception of law as a social instrument for facing and resolving social problems rather than running away from them is now a commonplace. Increasingly important is Myres McDougal's observation that not merely British legal positivism but also American legal realism leave one with a type of law which is incapable of meeting either the opportunities or responsibilities of the contemporary world.2 It has remained, however, for a legal positivist, P. E. Corbett, to give the final reductio ad absurdurn to such a system of jurisprudence in his Law and Society in the Relations of States.3 Consider, for example, the theory of auto-limitation introduced by Jellinek to account for legal obligation in international law.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Department of Political Science Westfield
    ABSTRACT DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE WESTFIELD, ALWYN W BA. HONORS UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX, 1976 MS. LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON, 1977 THE IMPACT OF LEADERSHIP ON POLITICS AND POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT IN ST VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES UNDER EBENEZER THEODORE JOSHUA AND ROBERT MILTON CATO Committee Chair: Dr. F.SJ. Ledgister Dissertation dated May 2012 This study examines the contributions of Joshua and Cato as government and opposition political leaders in the politics and political development of SVG. Checklist of variable of political development is used to ensure objectivity. Various theories of leadership and political development are highlighted. The researcher found that these theories cannot fully explain the conditions existing in small island nations like SVG. SVG is among the few nations which went through stages of transition from colonialism to associate statehood, to independence. This had significant effect on the people and particularly the leaders who inherited a bankrupt country with limited resources and 1 persistent civil disobedience. With regards to political development, the mass of the population saw this as some sort of salvation for fulfillment of their hopes and aspirations. Joshua and Cato led the country for over thirty years. In that period, they have significantly changed the country both in positive and negative directions. These leaders made promises of a better tomorrow if their followers are prepared to make sacrifices. The people obliged with sacrifices, only to become disillusioned because they have not witnessed the promised salvation. The conclusions drawn from the findings suggest that in the process of competing for political power, these leaders have created a series of social ills in SVG.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Loughlin Political Jurisprudence
    Martin Loughlin Political jurisprudence Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Loughlin, Martin (2016) Political jurisprudence. Jus Politicum: Revue de Droit Politique, 16 . ISSN 2101-8790 © 2016 Revue internationale de droit politique This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/67311/ Available in LSE Research Online: August 2016 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. POLITICAL JURISPRUDENCE MARTIN LOUGHLIN I: INTRODUCTION Political jurisprudence is a discipline that explains the way in which governmental authority is constituted. It flourished within European thought in the period between the sixteenth and nineteenth centuries and since the twentieth century has been in decline. That decline, attributable mainly to an extending rationalization of life and thought, has led to governmental authority increasingly being expressed in technical terms. And because many of the implications of this development have been masked by the growth of an academic disciplinary specialization that sacrifices breadth of understanding for depth of knowledge, sustaining the discipline has proved difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Sociology in International Relations: Open Society, Research Programme and Vocation
    George Lawson Historical sociology in international relations: open society, research programme and vocation Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Lawson, George (2007) Historical sociology in international relations: open society, research programme and vocation. International politics, 44 (4). pp. 343-368. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800195 © 2007 Palgrave Macmillan This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/2742/ Available in LSE Research Online: August 2012 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final manuscript accepted version of the journal article, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer review process. Some differences between this version and the published version may remain. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Historical Sociology in International Relations: Open Society, Research Programme and Vocation Article for International Politics forum on Historical Sociology April 2006 Abstract Over the last twenty years, historical sociology has become an increasingly conspicuous part of the broader field of International Relations (IR) theory, with advocates making a series of interventions in subjects as diverse as the origins and varieties of international systems over time and place, to work on the co-constitutive relationship between the international realm and state-society relations in processes of radical change.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Political Science
    Introduction to Political Science Professor Scott Williamson Fall 2021, Bocconi University e-mail: [email protected] Office hours: TBD Office: TBD Office room: TBD Class hours: TBD Class room: TBD Course Description What explains the rise of populism? How do authoritarian regimes hold onto power? Who opposes migration and why? When is the public more likely to hold political leaders accountable for poor governance? This course introduces the academic discipline of political science by exploring what its literatures have to say about these topics and others with substantive importance to global politics. We will read and discuss recent academic work utilizing a variety of methodological tools to answer these questions. In addition, the course is designed to help students navigate practical issues related to the effective conduct of political and social science research. We will review research practicalities ranging from choosing a research question to finding data and submitting articles to journals. Throughout the course, students will prepare a research proposal on a topic of their choice, which they will present to the class and submit in written format at the conclusion of the term. Course Objectives Throughout the course, students should expect: ▪ To develop knowledge about several major literatures in political science, gaining familiarity with ongoing debates and established findings. ▪ To acquire familiarity with a variety of primarily quantitative research methods used in political science and other social science disciplines. ▪ To develop understanding of how to consume and evaluate academic research, including how to recognize positive contributions, identify weaknesses, and provide constructive feedback in oral and written forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Policy Analysis
    FOREIGN POLICY ANALYSIS (listed in catalogue as Theoretical Explanations of Foreign Policy) Pol Sci 530 Jack S. Levy Rutgers University Spring 2014 Hickman 304 848/932-1073 [email protected] http://fas-polisci.rutgers.edu/levy/ Office Hours: after class and by appointment This seminar focuses on how states formulate and implement their foreign policies. Foreign Policy Analysis is a well-defined subfield within the International Relations field, with its own sections in the International Studies Association and American Political Science Association (Foreign Policy Analysis and Foreign Policy, respectively). Our orientation in this course is more theoretical and process-oriented than substantive or interpretive. We focus on policy inputs and the decision-making process rather than on policy outputs. An important assumption underlying this course is that the processes through which foreign policy is made have a considerable impact on the substantive content of policy. We follow a loose a levels-of-analysis framework to organize our survey of the theoretical literature on foreign policy. We examine rational state actor, bureaucratic/ organizational, institutional, societal, and psychological models. We look at the government decision-makers, organizations, political parties, private interests, social groups, and mass publics that have an impact on foreign policy. We analyze the various constraints within which each of these sets of actors must operate, the nature of their interactions with each other and with the society as a whole, and the processes and mechanisms through which they resolve their differences and formulate policy. Although most (but not all) of our reading is written by Americans and although much of it deals primarily with American foreign policy, most of these conceptual frameworks are much more general and not restricted to the United States.
    [Show full text]