Canada's Minority Government
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Third Party Election Campaigning Getting the Balance Right
Third Party Campaigning Review Third Party Election Campaigning – Getting the Balance Right Review of the operation of the third party campaigning rules at the 2015 General Election The Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts CBE March 2016 Third Party Election Campaigning – Getting the Balance Right Review of the operation of the third party campaigning rules at the 2015 General Election The Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts CBE Presented to Parliament by the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster by Command of Her Majesty March 2016 Cm 9205 © Crown copyright 2016 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] Print ISBN 9781474127950 Web ISBN 9781474127967 ID SGD0011093 03/16 19585 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Foreword 1 Foreword I was appointed as the Reviewer of Part 2 specific topics was sent to interested parties. of the Transparency in Lobbying, Non-Party My special thanks are due to all who took the Campaigning and Trade Union Administration trouble to respond to these questionnaires Act 2014 on 28 January 2015. -
Labour Parties Ideas Transfer and Ideological Positioning: Australia and Britain Compared B.M
Labour parties ideas transfer and ideological positioning: Australia and Britain compared B.M. Edwards & Matt Beech School of Humanities and Social Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Canberra School of Politics, Philosophy and International Studies, University of Hull, UK As part of this special issue examining policy transfer between the Labour Parties in Australia and Britain, this paper seeks to explore the relationship between the two on ideological positioning. In the 1990s there was substantial ideas transfer from the Australian Hawke‐ Keating government to Blair ‘New Labour’ in Britain, as both parties made a lunge towards the economic centre. This paper analyses how the inheritors of that shift, the Rudd/Gillard government in Australia and the Milliband and Corbyn leaderships in Britain, are seeking to define the role and purpose of labour parties in its wake. It examines the extent to which they are learning and borrowing from one another, and finds that a combination of divergent economic and political contexts have led to strikingly limited contemporary policy transfer. Keywords: Australian Labor Party; British Labour Party; Kevin Rudd; Julia Gillard; Ed Miliband; crisis In the 1990s there was substantial policy transfer between the Australian Labor Party and the Labour Party in Britain as they confronted the rise of neoliberalism. The ALP was in power from 1983‐1996 and introduced far reaching market liberalisation reforms complemented by a strengthened safety net. Due to the economic reforms of Thatcherism, Labour in Britain also remade itself to be more pro‐market, drawing considerably on policies of the ALP (Pierson and Castles, 2002). -
Third Party Election Spending and the Charter
ELECTIONSPENDING AND THE CHARTER 429 LIBERTE, EGALITE, ARGENT: THIRD PARTY ELECTION SPENDING AND THE CHARTER 0 ANDREW GEDDIS Both the federal government and the courts have le gouvernementfederal et /es cours de Justice ont brought about changes in election law. The author apportedes modificationsa la loi electorate.l 'auteur reviews these recent changes In the legal landscape revolt le.r recents changementsdans le cadre legal that surroundelection mies. Inparticular third party entourant/es reg/es electorates, tout particulierement electionspending. Thequestions of "whatrules exist" /es depenseselectorates de tiers. la question,a savoir and "who shall make them" are particularly « quelles sont les reg/es qui existent II et « qui les importantto the discussionas this area of law tries to me/Ira en place ,, est particulierement importante reconcile individual interestsin liberty and equality dans celle discussionetant donne que ce domainedu in a democracy.The trio of SupremeC our/ of Canada droit teme de reconcilierles interets individuelset la decisions, Libman v. Quebec (A.G.), Thomson notion de liberte et d'egalite d'une democralie.Les Newspapersv. Canada (A.G.) and Sauve v. Canada trois dkisions de la Cour supreme du Canada. (Chief Electoral Officer), reveal ambiguity In the notamment Libman c. le Quebec (A.G.). Thomson Court's rationalefor limiting Individual liberty at Newspapersc. le Canada (A.G.)et Sauve c. le Canada electiontime. Thisambiguity Is broachedIn the recent (Directeur general des elections), manlfestent Supreme Court of Canada case of Harper v. Canada I 'amblg1111erelativement au raisonnementde la Cour (A.G.)where the Courtaccepted that Parliamentmay de limiter la liberte individuellependant un scrutm. -
The Problem of Party Convergence
THE PROBLEM OF PARTY CONVERGENCE JANE GREEN Hallsworth Research Fellow School of Social Sciences University of Manchester [email protected] Earlier versions of this paper have been presented at the American Political Science Association annual meeting in Chicago, August 2007, the University of California, Berkeley Politics seminar, October 2007, a research colloquium for the College of William and Mary, Virginia, November 2007, and at the University of California at Davis research seminar, December 2007. I wish to thank James Adams, Laura Stoker, Eric Shickler, Ron Rapoport and Russ Dalton for their valuable comments on this paper. The remaining errors are the full responsibility of the author. The Problem of Party Convergence Political parties are expected to pursue moderate policies to gain votes, and so two parties pursuing the same strategy will eventually converge. I argue, however, that two parties cannot pursue an optimal strategy and share similar policy ground. Using a new measure in the 2005 British Election Study, and introducing the choice of third parties and new dimensions, this paper demonstrates that voter abstention and switching due to indifference can strongly outweigh votes gained by spatial proximity. However, parties experience these effects differently. The findings have implications for how we understand the policy positions of political parties in Britain and beyond. 1 Spatial modellers point to a lack of examples of party convergence to question the expectations of Downs (1957).1 They explain instead why parties tend to take polarised positions relative to their opponents (See Adams 2001; Adams and Merrill 2001; Adams and Merrill 2003; Adams et al. -
Comparative Analysis of Successful Third Parties Sean Panzer a Thesis
Comparative Analysis of Successful Third Parties Sean Panzer A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies University of Washington 2013 Committee: Charles Williams Michael Allen Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Interdisciplinary Arts and Science ©Copyright 2013 Sean Panzer University of Washington Abstract Comparative Analysis of Successful Third Parties Sean Panzer Assistant Professor Dr. Charles Williams Interdisciplinary Arts and Science This thesis explores how the Republican Party (US) and the Labour Party (UK) were successful in becoming the rare examples of third parties that displaced a major party to become one of the major parties in a two-party system. In exploring this question the thesis first examines the political science ‘rules of the game’ that make it extremely difficult for third parties, followed by a historical/sociological comparative analysis of case studies of the Republican and Labour Parties to determine if there are similarities in their rise to power. The comparative analysis shows that under extreme conditions, a fundamental sociological and demographic change may occur which supports the addressing of issues that the major parties will be unable to adequately incorporate for fear of upsetting their core base supporters. It is under this context that a third party could ultimately be successful in rising to major party status. i Table of Contents Introduction …………………………………………………………………..…….... 1 Chapter I: Political Science Perspectives of Limitations on Third Parties ....….…… 7 Chapter II: Republican Party ……….……………………………………..……….… 30 Chapter III: Labour Party (UK) …………………………………………...…………. 63 Chapter IV: Conclusion …………………………………………………..…..………. 95 Bibliography …………………………………………………………………………. 102 1 Introduction As electoral results continued to roll in for the contentious 2000 presidential election, one of the presidential candidates took the opportunity to reflect upon the close nature of the results. -
Opposition and Legislative Minorities: Constitutional Roles, Rights and Recognition
Opposition and Legislative Minorities: Constitutional Roles, Rights and Recognition International IDEA Constitution-Building Primer 22 Opposition and Legislative Minorities: Constitutional Roles, Rights and Recognition International IDEA Constitution-Building Primer 22 Elliot Bulmer © 2021 International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance International IDEA publications are independent of specific national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA, its Board or its Council members. The electronic version of this publication is available under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) licence. You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the publication as well as to remix and adapt it, provided it is only for non-commercial purposes, that you appropriately attribute the publication, and that you distribute it under an identical licence. For more information visit the Creative Commons website: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/>. Design and layout: International IDEA DOI: https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2021.67 ISBN: 978-91-7671-443-0 (PDF) Created with Booktype: <https://www.booktype.pro> Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 6 2. What is the issue? .................................................................................................. 9 2.1. The principle: democracy and dialogue ........................................................... -
Draft Report on the Role of The
Strasbourg, 5 June 2009 CDL-DEM(2009)003* Or. Engl. Study no. 497 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) DRAFT REPORT ON THE ROLE OF THE OPPOSITION on the basis of the comments by Ms Angelika NUSSBERGER (Substitute Member, Germany) and Mr Ergun ÖZBUDUN (Member, Turkey) *This document has been classified restricted on the date of issue. Unless the Venice Commission decides otherwise, it will be declassified a year after its issue according to the rules set up in Resolution CM/Res(2001)6 on access to Council of Europe documents. This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-DEM(2009)003 - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction..............................................................................................................................3 II. Scope of the study ....................................................................................................................3 III. Legal assessment of the role of opposition in democratic regimes ...............................3 A. The notion of opposition .....................................................................................................3 B. Opposition and separation of powers: institutional constraints...................................5 C. The content of the role of opposition ................................................................................6 IV. Legal protection of parliamentary opposition.................................................................8 A. The -
YSB Annual Report 2001-2002 (Pdf)
MISSION STATEMENT The Youth Services Bureau of Ottawa serves youth aged 12 and older. We focus on youth with difficulties affecting their physical and/or emotional well-being and development. We support youth in making positive health and lifestyle decisions. SERVICE LOCATIONS Head Office Mobile Crisis Unit 1338 _ Wellington Street, Ottawa Tel.: 562-3004 Tel.: 729-1000 Fax: 562-0229 Email: [email protected] Young Women’s Emergency Shelter Ottawa Central Services Tel.: 789-8220 147 Besserer Street, Ottawa Email: [email protected] Tel.: 241-7788 Email: [email protected] Non-profit Housing Tel.: 729-1000 West End Services Email: [email protected] 3730 Richmond Road, ste. 107, Nepean Tel.: 596-5621 E. Horne Program Email: [email protected] Tel.: 565-1651 Email: [email protected] East End Services 3013 St. Joseph Blvd., Orléans Livius Sherwood Observation & Tel.: 834-2660 Detention Centre Email: [email protected] Tel.: 523-5812 Email: [email protected] Youth Employment Services 360 Laurier Ave. West, ste. 302, Ottawa William E. Hay Centre Tel.: 236-8244 Tel.: 738-7776 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] YSB Website: http://www.ysb.on.ca FUNDERS Ministry of Community, Family & Children’s Services City of Ottawa Ministry of Training, Colleges & Universities United Way Ottawa Ministry of Health Government of Canada Trillium Foundation BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2001 - 2002 Al Hatton Patricia Sauvé-McCuan President Past President, YBS Youth Services Bureau of Ottawa Senior VP , Cognicase Inc E.D. National Voluntary Organizations Dr. Katalin Nathan Charles Bordeleau ~ 1st Vice President 2nd Vice President Inspector, Ottawa Police Service Clinical psychologist Family Therapy Associates Steve Wisking Secretary-treasurer, YSB Andrew Tremayne V.P., Eastern Canada Region, Canada Trust Lawyer Emond-Harnden Chris J. -
In Contemporary Jamaica There Are Two Major Political Parties
Rex McKenzie The Party & The Garrison Aug 2005 Introduction This work is intended to be a scholarly contribution in the area of Caribbean Political Economy. It is premised on the notion that the peculiar history of Jamaica, the slave plantation origin through to the colonial, neocolonial and post colonial forms of economic organization tend to the formation and reproduction of the total institution as a system of social organization.1 RT Smith in the original application of the Goffman concept of the total institution to plantation society describes it as a bureaucratically organized system in which blocks of people are treated as units and are marched through a set of regimented activities under the close surveillance of a small supervisory staff. 2 With regard to the social system and the corresponding social relations causality is assumed to flow from the political system and the political culture. In the post independence period (after 1962) patron-client relations between the state, its institutions and sections of the urban poor emerge as the defining social relationships of the social system as a whole. But these relationships are rooted in the history of the island with the relationship between the plantation owner (or his representative) and the slave exhibiting similar pronounced patron-client features. In my formulation the post independence emergence of the garrison constituency is construed as part of the historical imperative toward culturally familiar total institution forms of social management. Figueroa 1 The idea of the total institutions comes from Goffman’s 1960’s work on Asylums. In it small socially recognizable groups drive a larger group in through the production process in a very regimented and differentiated manner. -
Legal Systems in Asean – Singapore Chapter 3 – Government and the State
Government and the State LEGAL SYSTEMS IN ASEAN – SINGAPORE CHAPTER 3 – GOVERNMENT AND THE STATE THIO Li-ann* A. INTRODUCTION: THE ADOPTION OF A MODIFIED VARIANT OF THE WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM Upon attaining independence on 9 August 1965 after peacefully seceding from the Federation of Malaysia, Singapore retained a legal system that is essentially based on the British legal system, a colonial legacy, importing the common law and the Westminster model of parliamentary government, with some notable modifications, including a written constitution. Article 4 declares that the Constitution “is the supreme law of the Republic of Singapore”; hence any legislation which is inconsistent with the Constitution is void, to the extent of that inconsistency. The Westminster model of representative democracy is predicated on a bipartisan or multi-party system, where the ultimate political check resides in the ability of an opposition party to defeat the incumbent government at general elections and form an alternative government. This check of political turnover is absent in Singapore as the ruling party has a dominant majority in Parliament. B. PRINCIPLES OF CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT Separation of Powers Singapore has a unicameral Parliament which currently has 84 elected seats. 82 of these seats are held by the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) while the other 2 are held by Chiam See Tong (Singapore People’s Party) and Low Thia Khiang (Worker’s Party). Government is based on a variant of the separation of powers principle, organised around the familiar trichotomy of powers: the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. Unlike the UK Parliament, the Singapore Parliament is a body constituted under, and deriving powers from, the Constitution. -
Guide to Working with Parliaments ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
guide to working with parliaments ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This guide was developed by Stephen Hanmer, Specialist, Civil Society and Parliamentary Engagement, Programmes; and David Ponet, Consultant, Programmes; with support from Liza Barrie, Chief, Civil Society Partnerships; and under the overall guidance of Dr. Nicholas Alipui, Director of Programmes. Mark Young, Senior Health Specialist, provided direction on the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) 4 and 5 section in the appendix. Editorial support was provided by David Grosz and Karen Dukess as well as Catherine Rutgers. Certain sections of this guide have been excerpted/adapted from the 2004 IPU-UNESCO publication “A Guide to Parliamentary Practice: A Handbook.” Earlier versions of the guide were shared for feedback with all UNICEF country, regional and headquarters offices. There are more than 70 examples from UNICEF offices in - cluded throughout the publication, which could not have been developed without their support and input. Particular thanks goes to the following country and regional offices: Angola, Azerbaijan, Bolivia (Plurinational State of), Botswana, Brazil, Burundi, Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States Regional Office (CEE/CIS), China, Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Office (ESARO), Ecuador, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Ghana, India, Jordan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Lesotho, Malawi, Mauritania, Morocco, Mozambique, Nepal, Nigeria, Philippines, Republic of Congo, Senegal, Serbia, South Africa, Sudan, Swaziland, The Americas and the Caribbean Regional Office (TACRO), Turkey, United Republic of Tanzania, Viet Nam, Uruguay, Yemen and Zambia. Feedback was also provided by headquarters — in particular Programmes; Policy and Practice; Private Fundraising and Partnerships; and the Innocenti Research Centre — and UNICEF Brussels. UNICEF National Committees also provided input. -
Old Ottawa South Where Wishes Do Come True OSCA New Board
The O•S•C•A•R© The Community Voice of Old Ottawa South Year 32 , No. 10 The Ottawa South Community Association Review DECEMBER 2006 Old Ottawa South Where Wishes Do Come True Sidewalk Update - Before and After By Brendan McCoy Margaret Mary Elementary School. Unfortunately the sidewalk ended at the corner of the block, forcing pedestrians into the road, or across the street. This n the October issue of this paper I asked why infill development was was despite the fact that a sidewalk appeared in the site plan approved by the being done without sidewalks. Three examples were provided where infill City. OSWatch, and the OSCA Board, insisted that the sidewalk should be built, Idevelopments were without the provision of sidewalks. One project is and Councillor Doucet told both city staff and the developer that he expected completed, on Grove west of Seneca, one is just starting on a short section of the planned sidewalk to be provided. Woodbine, between Grosvenor and Barton, and one is being finished, on Scotia At the end of October the developer had the sidewalk installed; it is an Place. attractive and useful addition to the streetscape. Walk over and have a look. On Scotia Place the row of new town homes sit on the former site of St. OSCA New Board Members 2006-2007 Mike Lascelles, Hans Ruprecht (ex-officio, L’Amicale), Jim Steel, Steve Mennill, Jason Parry, Kevin Harper, Deirdre McQuillan (OSCA Executive Director), Brendan McCoy, Michael Jenkin, Greg Strahl, Gayatri Jayaraman, Stephen Haines, Val MacIntosh, Patti Ryan, Ed Keyes Missing: