THAMES 63 Fact File
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Whose River? London and the Thames Estuary, 1960-2014* Vanessa Taylor Univ
This is a post-print version of an article which will appear The London Journal, 40(3) (2015), Special Issue: 'London's River? The Thames as a Contested Environmental Space'. Accepted 15 July 2015. Whose River? London and the Thames Estuary, 1960-2014* Vanessa Taylor Univ. of Greenwich, [email protected] I Introduction For the novelist A.P. Herbert in 1967 the problem with the Thames was simple. 'London River has so many mothers it doesn’t know what to do. ... What is needed is one wise, far- seeing grandmother.’1 Herbert had been campaigning for a barrage across the river to keep the tide out of the city, with little success. There were other, powerful claims on the river and numerous responsible agencies. And the Thames was not just ‘London River’: it runs for over 300 miles from Gloucestershire to the North Sea. The capital’s interdependent relationship with the Thames estuary highlights an important problem of governance. Rivers are complex, multi-functional entities that cut across land-based boundaries and create interdependencies between distant places. How do you govern a city that is connected by its river to other communities up and downstream? Who should decide what the river is for and how it should be managed? The River Thames provides a case study for exploring the challenges of governing a river in a context of changing political cultures. Many different stories could be told about the river, as a water source, drain, port, inland waterway, recreational amenity, riverside space, fishery, wildlife habitat or eco-system. -
Thames Conservancy Act, 1950
Thames Conservancy Act, 1950 14 GEO. 6 Cli. 1 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short and collective titles. 2. Division of Act into Parts. 3. Amending definition of Thames in Act of 1932. 4. Interpretation. 5. Repeal of enactments. PART II CONSTITUTION AND PROCEEDINGS OF CONSERVATORS 6. Constitution of Conservators. 7. Increase in number of Conservators. 8. Term of office of Conservators. 9. Conservator interested in a contract. 10. As to contracts. PART III FURTHER POWERS IN RELATION TO CONSERVANCY NAVIGATION ETC. 11. Amendment of sections 69 70 and 71 of Act of 1932. 12. Power to enter and inspect vessels. 13. Name of launch to be conspicuously displayed. 14. Amendment of section 92 of Act of 1932. 15. Owner of pleasure boat to afford information as to person in charge. 16. Removal of sunk stranded or abandoned vessels. PART IV LANDS 17. Purchase of lands. PART V PREVENTION OF POLLUTION 18. Special interpretation relating to pollution. 19. Map of Thames catchment area. A Ch. I Thames Conservancy 14 GEO. 6 Act, 1950 Section 20. Amendment of section 124 of Act of 21. Sanitary authorities owners and occupiers to afford information. 22. Provision in case of neglect of sanitary authority to perform certain duties. 23. Inspection of sanitary arrangements of vessels. 24. Removal of dead animals. PART VI CHARGES ON VESSELS MERCHANDISE ETC. (a) Tolls on merchandise traffic 25. Tolls on merchandise traffic. (b) Tolls for piers 26. Tolls leviable at piers and landing places. (c) Lock tolls and charges on pleasure boats 27. Lock tolls on pleasure boats. -
Delivering Heat Networks Understanding the Challenge
Delivering Heat Networks Understanding the challenge District heating networks are a key component These challenges and complexities are best of a future low carbon London. They will addressed by bringing together engineering, provide the means to capture and distribute planning, finance and regulatory expertise into heat from a diverse mix of primary as well as an integrated project delivery unit. secondary heat sources to serve homes and businesses. Development of district heating Arup’s multidisciplinary approach to district networks at scale across the capital over the heating project delivery underpins our work next ten years is therefore essential for London in London and across the UK. We support to meet the Mayor’s target of meeting 25% public and private sector clients from early of London’s energy needs from decentralised stage resource assessments and policy advice sources by 2025. through to scheme design, business case and procurement. We work closely with clients at Thanks to previous mayoral programmes such each stage to scope the opportunities, analyse as the London Heat Map and Decentralised the fundamentals and develop practicable Energy Masterplanning (DEMaP), the solutions for bankable projects. challenge today is no longer knowing where the opportunities lie; it is understanding how to deliver them in the face of multiple barriers, including: - long investment horizons; - limited windows of opportunity; - an opaque regulatory framework; - a stigma of poorly performing schemes in the past; and - limited experience among local authorities and developers. 2 Understanding the challenge Delivering solutions The unique working philosophy at Arup – Through our global knowledge management founded on flexibility, transparency and systems, we are able to harness ideas and ability to deliver – is ideally suited to practical experience from projects worldwide. -
An Innovative Organizational Arrangement for Comprehensive Water Services; the Thames Water Authority As a Model for Complex '
.3 An Innovative Organizational Arrangement for Comprehensive Water Services; The Thames Water Authority as a Model for Complex ',. Urban Areas of the Great Lakes JONATHAN W. BULKLEY THOMAS A. GROSS September 1975 Research Project Technical Completion Report OWRT Project No. A-083-MICH Grant No. 14-31-0001-5022 Program in Resource Policy and Management School of Natural Resources ~\\lV 0, ~~~ Department of Civil Engineering z ; : College of Engineering ::::a - -... ~~ ~O) './ 1811 ~ . I I \, ..J .-_. __. ... .:..,.~- ..L. J ...;J...; " ..L..J.. c.t',"" '...., _n~,l_.>...J TNTPRTOR__•• - _.J. - D AN INNOVATIVE ORGANIZATIONAL ARRANGEMENT FOR COMPREHENSIVE WATER SERVICES r. The ~Thames Water Authority as a Model for Complex Urban Areas of the Great Lakes by ,/ Jonathan W. Bulkley Principal Investigator and C Thomas A. Gross Research Project Technical Completion Report OWRT Project No. A-083-MICH Grant No. 14-31-0001-5022 Research Investigation Period: January - September 1975 Submi tted to the Office of Water Research and Technology U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D. C. Program in Resource Policy and Management School of Natural Resources Department of Civil Engineering College of Engineering The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan September 1975 ABSTRACT A need exists for regional consideration and eval uation of comprehensive water services in complex urban areas. The Thames Water Authority (TWA) in England pro vides such comprehensive water services to the entire Thames River Basin including metropolitan London; an area of 5000 square miles with a population of 12 million. In recognition of the possible application of such a con cept to complex urban areas of the Great Lakes, the prin cipal investigator spent six months as a participant-observer with the Authority and provides a detailed description of its organization and operation. -
Heat Networks: 2019 Q2 Pipeline
HEAT NETWORKS: 2019 Q2 PIPELINE 1 [email protected] 2019 Q2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 COMMERCIALISATION STAGE PROJECTS ................................................................................................................ 7 Church Street_COM ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Bolton Town Centre EfW_DPD ............................................................................................................................... 9 Cardiff Bay Heat Network_DPD ............................................................................................................................ 10 Crewe Town Centre_DPD ..................................................................................................................................... 11 Town Centre Heat Network_DPD ......................................................................................................................... 12 Exeter City Centre_DPD ........................................................................................................................................ 13 Maidstone Heat Network_DPD ............................................................................................................................ 14 Huddersfield Heat Network ................................................................................................................................. -
The Hydrography & Cartography of a Great
THE HYDROGRAPHY & CARTOGRAPHY OF A GREAT SEAPORT by C o m m a n d e r E. C. SHANKLAHD, R. H. R., F. R . S. E., R i v e r S uperintendent a n d H ydrographic S u r v e y o r , P o r t o f L o n d o n A u t h o r i t y . The Port of London Authority exercises jurisdiction over that part of the Thames which flows from Teddington Lock (approximately) to a line joining Havengore Creek in Essex and Warden Point in Sheppey, Kent. To depict the changes in the hydrography of the channels, creeks, whar ves, bridges and dock entrances the survey of the river requires continuous attention. CARTOGRAPHY. Within the dock system a regular watch is kept to maintain depth, as a considerable amount of silt in suspension finds its way inside the tidal gates. The triangulation and surveyor’s working sheets are connected with those of the Ordnance Survey and are divided up into convenient lengths of river, more or less identified with the Reaches so well known to mariners. The survey sheets and the scales on which they are projected are enumerated in the following table. LIST OF SURVEYS — RIVER THAMES TIDEWAY Chxvt Section of River. Date of Scale Survey i. 1929 1/1056 2. Cross Deep to Petersham Drawdock.................................................... 1929 )) 3- Petersham Drawdock to Richmond Lock and Weir........................ 1929 )) )) 4 - Richmond Lock and Weir to Church Ferry, Isleworth.................. 1928 *>• 1928 )) 6. 1927 )) )) 7- 1926-7 8. Barnes R ailw ay Bridge to Chiswick Ferry......................................... -
The Journal of U the London Underground Railway
THE JOURNAL OF U THE LONDON UNDERGROUND RAILWAY SOCIETY I ssue No 104 Volume 9 No 8 August 1970 N EVEN GREATER POWER FAILURE CHAOS At 17.1 5 on Monday 6t h July 1970, at the height of the evening r ush hour, a pr otective relay operating a D circuit breaker t r i pped t oo soon and effectively cut off t he power supply t o a very l arge section of the central part of the Undergr ound. The only secti ons not affected at all were the Met r opo l i t an north of Bake r Street E (which is s upplied from the Nat i onal Grid) and the Victoria Line (which i s fed by a direct cabl e from Lots Road). Some sections were back in service fairly soon, but others, notably he eastern part of the Central R Line were out of action for a l ong time. It seems that most services were interrupted for about fifty minutes, and that all services were running normally again by 19.000 G The circuit breaker concerned was at Greenwich Power Station, and its failure broke the link between Greenwich and Lots Road, and me ant effectively that power generated at both these s tations could not be f ed to the system. R There are two extremely disqui eting features of this failure; communications with staff and passengers broke down compl etely, resul ting in numerous stations becoming dangerously overcrowded and, much more serious, o almost a quarter of a million passengers being trapped in s tationary trains in the tunnels at a time when the temperature outside was 77°F - no-one seems t o know what U the temperature rose t o in the trains. -
River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock
NRA Thames 254 National Rivers Authority Thames Region TR44 River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock Catchment Review October 1994 NRA Thames Region Document for INTERNAL CIRCULATION only National River Authority Thames Region Catchment Planning - West River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock Catchment Review October 1994 River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock - Catchment Review CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 2. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE WATER ENVIRONMENT Overview 2 Geology and Topography 2 Hydrology 2 Water Resources 5 Water Quality 9 Pollution Control 14 Consented Discharges 15 * Flood Defence 18 Fisheries 18 Conservation 19 Landscape 21 Recreation 23 Navigation 26 Land Use Planning Context 29 Minerals 31 P2J73/ i River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock - Catchment Review Page 3. CATCHMENT ISSUES 34 South West Oxfordshire Reservoir Proposal 34 Ground water Pollution 35 River Levels & Flows 35 Habitat Degradation 35 Wolvercote Pit 36 Eutrophication of the Thames 36 River Thames : Seacourt Stream Relationship 36 The River Thames Through Oxford 37 Oxford Structures Study 37 Oxford Sewage Treatment Works 37 Kidlington Sewage Treatment Works 38 Oxford Sewers 38 Development Pressure 38 Navigation Issues 39 Landscape Issues 39 Recreation Issues 39 Wiltshire Berkshire Canal 40 Summary of Key Issues 41 4. CATCHMENT ACTIONS 43 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 51 P2573/ i i River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock - Catchment Review LIST OF TABLES Page 2.1 Details of Licensed Ground/Surface Water Abstractions of Greater than lML/day 9 2.2 RQOs, -
TLS Review 2008 Part 3
FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION Potential Project Outcomes It is proposed that the ‘Restoration of the Lost Floodplain’ will: • Optimise the use of the floodplain for water to go during a flood event. • Identify ways to restore and reconnect the natural rhythms of the river corridor to create a ‘living landscape’ – a mosaic of habitats (created at a landscape scale) allowing wildlife to flourish and move about in as climate changes. • Create a network of sluices, controls and channels linked to a real-time flood forecasting model to enable flooding to be carefully controlled across a large area, reducing the risk of disruption to people. • Put in place a network of sustainable footpaths, cycle routes, informal trails, signage, and dry routes to allow visitors and locals to navigate through the landscape even in times of flood and drought. • Restore the historic landscape framework of fields, avenues, creeks, ponds, woodland, grazed wet meadows and native hedges. • Put in place a long-term management plan to carry out the day-to-day maintenance of the riverside that will include an active volunteer programme. • Establish an education and outreach programme to connect people with their environment. Project Scope – By Area Below is a list of possible project locations. Considerable consultation and funding will be needed before any agreement is reached. Syon Flood Meadows , Kew Gardens, Kew Haha, The Royal Mid-Surrey Golf Course, River Crane, The Old Deer Park, Petersham Meadows, Ham Towpath & Radnor Gardens, Ham Lands, Marble Hill Park and the Warren Footpath, Home Park at Hampton Court Palace, Canbury Gardens Kingston, Thames Ditton, River Mole & Cigarette Island, Hurst Park, Broom Road Recreation Ground, and other riverside settlements & town centres. -
Tidal Thames2.Qxd 12/3/07 2:14 PM Page 1
Tidal Thames2.qxd 12/3/07 2:14 PM Page 1 THE PORT OF LONDON AUTHORITY MAGAZINE b ISSUE 2 b WINTER 2007 Tidal Thames2.qxd 12/3/07 2:14 PM Page 2 Some people have a take off. Yet, within 10 years, shipping had perception that the Port’s taken an enormous stride: container carriers, C big dockside cranes and straddle carriers dead because they don’t A p became the norm. see many ships in the a r The merchant maritime world changed Comment centre of London. But flo incredibly quickly and this, more than the Port’s still thriving - it’s anything, spelt the end of the central London just moved east. docks - because they just couldn’t be su adapted to cope with the new generation of inf ships, and they couldn’t offer the freight Bu infrastructure to move the goods these vessels carried. ap served at sea for 11 years after leaving But the commercial Port of London didn’t on school, and I worked for the Port of disappear; it just moved down river. That’s bro London Authority for 32. During that why it’s so frustrating when people say the his time I’ve had jobs as varied as duty dock Thames is dead to shipping. master, port control officer and harbour People need to be honest with themselves of master at both ends of the tidal river, so when they think back to the ‘good old days’. his I’ve seen shipping and the Thames Days when, if you fell in the enclosed docks, change dramatically. -
Local Energy Production
Ref. Ares(2018)703523 - 06/02/2018 ––– 0 D3.1 LOCAL ENERGY PRODUCTION 1 Administrative Detail Local Energy Production WP 3 Document History Version Comment Date Authorised Ver 01a Initial outline 23 May ‘17 ES/PM Ver 01b Comments from RBG incorp 09 June ‘17 ES/PM Ver 01c Comments from Milan incorp 28 June ‘17 ES/PM Ver 01d Comments from Lisbon incorp 07 August ‘17 ES/PM Ver 01e Full draft for review 22 August ‘17 ES/PM Number of Pages Number of Annexes 0 Responsible Organisation Lead Author Lisboa E‐Nova (LBN) Eduardo Silva/Pedro Machado Contributing Organisation(s) Contributors Royal Borough of Greenwich (RBG) Sarah Butler Politecnico di Milano (PoliMi) Roberto Nocerino Município de Lisboa (CML) Miguel Águas Quality Control QC by Date Roberto Nocerino John Polak Bernadett Degrendele Rick Curtis PMO (JMP) Approval for Submission to EC Approved Date 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYM LIST ............................................................................................................. 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 6 1. ENERGY POLICIES .................................................................................................. 8 1.1. LONDON & UNITED KINGDOM .................................................................................. 9 1.2. MILAN & ITALY .................................................................................................... -
Edition 0125
Est 2016 Borough of Twickenham 0125 The Twickenham Tribune Contents TwickerTape TwickerSeal Twickenham Riverside History Through Postcards Team Mayor Arts and Entertainment Whitton High Street – Ellis Fine Foods River Crane Sanctuary Film Festival Steam, Steel and Shells St Mary’s Update Twickers Foodie Letters Great River Race Mark Aspen Reviews Football Focus A Traveller’s Tales Rugby updates Bedroom Fires Contributors TwickerSeal Alan Winter Erica White Sammi Macqueen Helen Baker Bruce Lyons St Mary’s Alison Jee Shona Lyons Mark Aspen Shooting Star Trust Doug Goodman Rugby Football Union National Audit Office London Fire Brigade EDITORS Berkley Driscoll Teresa Read Contact [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Published by: Twickenham Alive Limited (in association with World InfoZone Limited) Registered in England & Wales The Admiral Nelson, Whitton Reg No 10549345 The Twickenham Tribune is registered with Photo by Berkley Driscoll the ICO under the Data Protection Act, Reg No ZA224725 TwickerTape - News in Brief THE COMMUNITY FUND Round 3 of the Community Fund officially launches on Monday 1st April and applications will be accepted until Friday 31st May. I have attached an electronic version of the poster and flyer for this round and would be most grateful if you could share with your organisation and users so that everyone has the opportunity to apply if they are interested. https://www.richmond.gov.uk/community_fund Is Wellesley Court in Strawberry Hill to be Sold? Residents in Wellesley Court are concerned that they might lose their homes if the property is sold by their commercial landlord. A number of the tenants are elderly and have lived in their homes for many years.