DOCSLIB.ORG

Our Message 2005/06 Corporate Responsibility Report Chairman’S Message

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Our Message 2005/06 Corporate Responsibility Report Chairman’S Message Our Message 2005/06 Corporate Responsibility Report Chairman’s Message General Motors is committed to sound corporate citizenship in all aspects of our business. Above all, we know that maintaining a strong company will help ensure our continued commitment to the communities in which we live and work, and to the social interests we have identified as important to our business and our stakeholders. In the energy and environment arena, we at GM believe it is highly unlikely that oil alone will supply all of the world’s rapidly growing automotive energy requirements; we know there is no single solution that will offer sustainable transportation; and we are concerned about the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. In Sound Citizenship and Strong our view, the key to addressing these concerns is energy Performance diversity. As part of the solution, we’re dramatically “General Motors is committed to sound intensifying our efforts to displace petroleum-based fuels — by building a lot more vehicles that run on alternatives, corporate citizenship in all aspects of such as E85 ethanol, and by significantly expanding and our business. Above all, we know that accelerating our commitment to electrically driven vehicles, maintaining a strong company will help such as hybrids; advanced “plug-in” hybrids; extended range electric vehicles, like our Chevy Volt concept; and hydrogen ensure our continued commitment to fuel cell vehicles, like our drivable Chevy Sequel. the communities in which we live and GM’s corporate responsibilities extend to other areas as well, work and to the social interests we have including safety and diversity. At GM, we strive to make each identified as important to our business new model safer than the one it replaces. We are a leader in global research, engineering, and innovation to improve road and our stakeholders.” safety and reduce injuries and fatalities. The application of technologies such as OnStar and StabiliTrak® to our entire Rick Wagoner North American vehicle line by 2010 is an example of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer safety strategy in action. We also have a commitment to keeping our employees safe on the job. GM’s Global Safety team facilitates the sharing and implementation of best practices that have proven successful in other parts of the company. The result is that our plants are among the safest in the industry. Finally, GM employs one of the most diverse work forces in the global business community — 284,000 people around the world — and we are committed to promoting diversity within our ranks. We believe the diversity of our workforce helps us design, build, and market vehicles that best meet the needs of our diverse consumers. Thank you for your interest in General Motors. Rick Wagoner Chairman and Chief Executive Officer General Motors 2005/06 Corporate Responsibility Report 1-1 Our Message | About This Report GM’s long commitment to transparency is evidenced by our corporate reporting on non-financial matters. We published our first environmental report in 1994 in consultation with the Ceres organization. The report has evolved over the years from a focus on GM’s environmental performance in the United States to a corporate responsibility report that covers our global operations in all four regions. 1994 1995 1996 1997 -CERES Endorsement -Environmental, -Environmental, -Community Participation -Environmental Report Health & Safety Report Health & Safety Report -Product & Traffic Safety -U.S. Based -North American Based -North American Based -Supplier Relations -Printed report 1998 1999 2000 2001 -Stakeholder Relationships -Economic, Social -Economic, Social -Sustainability Report -Diversity & Environmental & Environmental -Regional Information -Philanthropy Report -Web Based Report -Web Based Report Merged -Global Reporting Initiative -Global Reporting Initiative 2002 2003 2004 2005 -Corporate Responsibility -GMAbility -GRI “In Accordance” -One Global Report General Motors 2005/06 Corporate Responsibility Report 1-2 Our Message | About This Report 2002 GLOBAL REPorTING INITIATIVE GUIDELINES GM’s Corporate Responsibility reporting has followed the 2002 Global Reporting Initiative Guidelines (GRI) since their inception. This fulfills the commitment to transparency and accountability — a commitment that is increasingly important for global companies with multiple stakeholders. The report is published online at gmresponsibility.com, with PDF files available to download and print on demand. In the 2005/06 report, GM describes its progress in the traditional GRI focus areas of product, economic, social and environmental performance. These issues are carefully managed according to GM’s vision and strategy and are guided by its widely renowned internal governance process. GM presents these achievements within the context of key issues that impact our business. This report covers the year 2005 and 2006 through mid year. The data are primarily calendar year 2005 information. Our Corporate Responsibility Report was prepared internally by a team of GM employees and reviewed and endorsed by an Editorial Review Board comprised of GM Leaders and subject matter experts. Our previous Corporate Responsibility Report covered calendar year 2004 and part of 2005. The full report is available on www.gmresponsibility. com. We continue to fully integrate the report with www.gmability.com, the company’s Corporate Responsibility web site. General Motors 2005/06 Corporate Responsibility Report 1-3 Performance at a Glance 2005/06 Corporate Responsibility Report General Motors 2005/06 Corporate Responsibility Report cover-b Performance at a Glance | Scorecard GM’s environmental, economic, product and social Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are shown below in our Performance Scorecard. The tables cover KPIs comparing 2004 to 2005 and some of our five year targets. Economic Indicators 2004 2005 Financial KPIs 2004 Annual Report pg. 46 2005 Annual Report pg. 45 Product Indicators 2004 2005 Performance Fuel Economy, miles per gallon (US) - Car 29.4 28.9 2 % decrease - Light truck 21.4 21.4 No change CO2 per mile, by model year (US) - Car 302gm 307 2 % increase - Light Truck 439 430 2 % reduction Performance Environmental Indicators 2004 2005 2000-2005 target Energy use (GWh) ** 31,686 31,442 Reduced 14.8 % (exceeded 10% Target) CO2 emissions (metric tons) 12.35 million 11.68 million Reduced 15.5 % (exceeded 8% Target) Waste (metric tons) *** 4.08 million 3.53 million Reduced 23.4 % since 2000 (target 15%) Recycling rate 86.5 % 88 % Increased 7.3 % since 2000 (target 15%) Water use (cubic meters) 57.5 million 60.7 million Reduced 19.0 % (exceeded 10% Target) 118 of 118 manufacturing facilities have Sites certified to ISO 14001 99 % 100 % implemented an EMS 1 metric ton = 1,000 kilograms = 2,200 pounds Performance Social Indicators 2004 2005 2004-2005 Community donations/sponsorships (US$)* $68 million $61.2 million Reduced 10 % Diversity: hourly female employees 18.4% 17.3% Reduced 6 % (U.S. workforce) Diversity: salary female employees 25.9% 24.8% Reduced 4.3 % (U.S. workforce) Diversity: hourly minority employees 25% 24% Reduced 4 % (U.S. workforce) Diversity: salary minority employees 20% 20% No change (U.S. workforce) Recordable injury rate (per 100 employees) 2.98 2.85 Reduced 13.4 % (North American workforce) Lost time accident rate (per 100 employees) 0.26 0.24 Reduced 7.7 % (North American workforce) * See currency converter at www.oanda.com, a non-GM site, please check privacy policy. ** See energy conversion factors at physics.nist.gov, a non-GM site, please check privacy policy. *** See unit conversion factors at ts.nist.gov, a non-GM site, please check privacy policy General Motors 2005/06 Corporate Responsibility Report 2-1 About Us 2005/06 Corporate Responsibility Report General Motors 2005/06 Corporate Responsibility Report cover-c About Us | Introduction General Motors designs, builds, and markets cars and trucks worldwide. In 2005, GM sold nearly 9.2 million cars and trucks, the second highest sales volume in our history. GM has manufacturing operations in 33 countries and sales operations in 200 countries. General Motors has a long tradition of success and innovation within the automotive business, which was founded in 1908. Today the company’s global headquarters are at the GM Renaissance Center in Detroit, Michigan, USA. GM’s business units are located in North America (GMNA), Europe (GME), Asia-Pacific (GMAP), and Latin America, Africa and the Middle East (GMLAAM). Taking the Lead General Motors is a global designer and manufacturer of cars and trucks with Brands and Partners operations in 33 countries and sales networks in 200 countries. Guided by a six-point set of core values that em- brace continuous improvement, customer enthusiasm, innovation, in- tegrity, teamwork and individual respect and responsibility, GM is a leader not only in the automotive industry, but also in Since the 1920s, GM has been driven by strong, distinctive corporate responsibility. brands. Our success in the marketplace is directly related to innovative products that meet and exceed our consumers’ expectations. Going forward, we’re putting great emphasis on building and differentiating each of our automotive brands around the world, and accelerating our drive for consistent, world-class distribution networks. GM’s Brands GM’s cars and trucks are sold under the following brands: Buick Cadillac Chevrolet Daewoo Holden Hummer GMC Opel Pontiac Saab Saturn Vauxhall General Motors 2005/06 Corporate Responsibility Report 3-1 About Us | Brands and Partners Parts and accessories are sold under the GM, GM CommUNICATING VALUES TO Goodwrench, and ACDelco brands through GM emPLOYeeS Service and Parts Operations (SPO). In the preface to “Winning OnStar (www.onstar.com) is with Integrity — Our the industry leader in vehicle, Values and Guidelines for security, and information Employee Conduct,” GM’s services in the U.S. Chairman and CEO Rick Wagoner states: Additional information about GM’s brands is available on GM Team Members: the company’s corporate web site, www.gm.com, and The pace of change at GM has never been faster, in our 2005 Annual Report.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hydrogen Fueling Station to Open in the Bodensee Area
    Joint Press Release HYDROGEN FUELING STATION TO OPEN IN THE BODENSEE AREA • Shell filling station in Geisingen will now service fuel cell vehicles • Location extends the supply network for hydrogen fuel in the direction of Alpine countries • The federal government fosters an investment of 700,000 euros via an Innovation Initiative Geisingen, 07 December, 2016 – Today the ninth hydrogen filling station in Baden-Württemberg was oPened in Geisingen’s Tuttlingen district. The station is another important steP in Shell, Linde and H2 Mobility's efforts to exPand the nationwide hydrogen infrastructure within the framework of the Clean Energy PartnershiP. Unimpieded travel for hydrogen-powered fuel cell vehicles on the way from Stuttgart to SwitZerland and Austria is another advantage of the new location: this is also the direct connection to the Testing and Technology Center of Daimler AG in Immendingen, which is currently under construction. Quiet and clean The fuel cell car pulls into the fuelling station on Bodenseestrasse in Geisingen‘s district of Kirchen-Hausen with next to no noise emission. The new hydrogen fuel column is located between the station‘s other pumps. "The fuel noZZle is as easy to use as those for Petrol and die- sel," says Bettina Kunz, who has been the proprietor of the Geisingen Shell station since 2014. About three minutes later - and the vehicle has been easily filled with gaseous hydrogen (chemical formula H2). At 9.50 euros, a kilogram of hydrogen is an excellent value, since a vehicle‘s full four to five kilograms H2 tank will last, on average, 400 to 500 kilometers.
    [Show full text]
  • Steady State and Transient Efficiencies of A
    STEADY STATE AND TRANSIENT EFFICIENCIES OF A FOUR CYLINDER DIRECT INJECTION DIESEL ENGINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION IN A HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Masters of Science Charles Van Horn August, 2006 STEADY STATE AND TRANSIENT EFFICIENCIES OF A FOUR CYLINDER DIRECT INJECTION DIESEL ENGINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION IN A HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE Charles Van Horn Thesis Approved: Accepted: Advisor Department Chair Dr. Scott Sawyer Dr. Celal Batur Faculty Reader Dean of the College Dr. Richard Gross Dr. George K. Haritos Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Dr. Iqbal Husain Dr. George R. Newkome Date ii ABSTRACT The efficiencies of a four cylinder direct injection diesel engine have been investigated for the implementation in a hybrid electric vehicle (HEV). The engine was cycled through various operating points depending on the power and torque requirements for the HEV. The selected engine for the HEV is a 2005 Volkswagen 1.9L diesel engine. The 2005 Volkswagen 1.9L diesel engine was tested to develop the steady-state engine efficiencies and to evaluate the transient effects on these efficiencies. The peak torque and power curves were developed using a water brake dynamometer. Once these curves were obtained steady-state testing at various engine speeds and powers was conducted to determine engine efficiencies. Transient operation of the engine was also explored using partial throttle and variable throttle testing. The transient efficiency was compared to the steady-state efficiencies and showed a decrease from the steady- state values.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 2002 - 2007
    Report 2002 - 2007 www.cep-berlin.de 2 Foreword 3 Foreword Just imagine … A groundbreaking project began with these ment and the leading role played by the Federal Ministry of words four years ago. It focused on a vision of a new kind of Transport, Building and Urban Affairs. We would like to mobility designed to be sustainable and emission-free express our heartfelt gratitude at this point. responsible. It aimed at providing our society with the free- dom it needs for global cooperation and also meet the chal- The Clean Energy Partnership is entering a new phase by lenges of future business and political developments. the second half of 2008. The National Organization for Hydrogen and Fuel Cells (NOW) will probably back the CEP In order to allow this vision to become reality, vehicle man- as a lighthouse project within the National Hydrogen and ufacturers, energy suppliers and the German Federal Gov- Fuel Cell Technology Innovation Program (NIP). Shell and ernment formed the Clean Energy Partnership (CEP) in 2003 the Hamburg public transport company Hamburger in line with the recommendations of the Transport Energy Hochbahn will have joined the Clean Energy Partnership in Strategy (VES).Our joint aim is to carry out tests and provide May. And consideration is being given to establishing the evidence to see whether hydrogen can fit into existing sys- first transport corridor with integrated hydrogen infrastruc- tems and be used as a fuel of the future. ture between Berlin and Hamburg. A great deal has happened since then. The hydrogen This report on the first phase of the Clean Energy Partner- demonstration project in Berlin is one of the largest in the ship project shows you the most important milestones world.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the Ecocar Challenge As a Non-Traditional Domain for Software and Computer Engineering Capstone Course
    AC 2011-1099: USING THE ECOCAR CHALLENGE AS A NON-TRADITIONAL DOMAIN FOR SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING CAPSTONE COURSE Richard Stansbury, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Richard S. Stansbury is an assistant professor of computer science and computer engineering at Embry- Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, FL. He instructs the capstone senior design course for computer and software engineering. His current research interests include unmanned aircraft, certification issues for unmanned aircraft, mobile robotics, and applied artificial intelligence. Massood Towhidnejad, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Massood Towhidnejad is a tenure full professor of software engineering in the department of Electrical, Computer, Software and System Engineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. His teaching interests include artificial intelligence, autonomous systems, and software engineering with emphasis on software quality assurance and testing. He has been involved in research activities in the areas of software engineering, software quality assurance and testing, autonomous systems, and human factors. Page 22.1643.1 Page c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Using the EcoCAR Challenge as a Non-Traditional Domain for Software and Computer Engineering Capstone Course Abstract: This paper presents the opportunities provided by EcoCAR: The NeXt Challenge in supporting a capstone design course in computer and software engineering. Students participating in the course were responsible for implementing a sub-system of a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. Being a sponsored competition organized by the Department of Energy, the project provided many unique learning opportunities for students in the course and those that they interacted with from other disciplines. This paper will discuss both the benefits of utilizing such a competition for a senior capstone design course as well as some of the challenges faced.
    [Show full text]
  • 14V-409 GENERAL MOTORS LLC (3 Pages) Global Vehicle Safety
    14V-409 GENERAL MOTORS LLC (3 pages) Global Vehicle Safety July 2, 2014 Ms. Nancy Lewis Associate Administrator for Enforcement National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Recall Management Division (NVS-215) 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE – Room W45-306 Washington, DC 20590 Dear Ms. Lewis: The following information is submitted pursuant to the requirements of 49 CFR 573.6 as it applies to a determination by General Motors to conduct a safety related recall for certain 2014 model year Buick Regal, Cadillac XTS, and Chevrolet Camaro and Impala vehicles. 573.6(c)(1): Buick, Cadillac and Chevrolet Brands of General Motors Company 573.6(c)(2)(3)(4): This information is shown on the attached sheet. 573.6(c)(5): General Motors has decided that a defect, which relates to motor vehicle safety, exists in certain 2014 model year Buick Regal, Cadillac XTS, and Chevrolet Camaro and Impala vehicles. Some of these vehicles may have fasteners that are not torqued to specifications at the interface of the intermediate shaft and the steering gear and/or at the lower control arm to the lower ball joint. If these fasteners are improperly torqued, they could back out and the vehicle could exhibit loss of steering, increasing the risk of a crash. 573.6(c)(6): On March 4, 2014, GM’s Oshawa Car Assembly Plant in Ontario, Canada (“Oshawa”) learned of a warranty claim filed on December 23, 2013, at a California dealership for an Oshawa-built Chevrolet Impala related to an improperly fastened lower control arm. On that same day, Oshawa initiated a root cause investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • (Crm) En General Motors Colmotores?
    ¿SE ESTÁ IMPLEMENTANDO CORRECTAMENTE CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT (CRM) EN GENERAL MOTORS COLMOTORES? MARÍA DEL PILAR ORTEGA OVALLE UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES FACULTAD DE ADMINISTRACIÓN BOGOTÁ D.C. 2003 ¿SE ESTÁ IMPLEMENTANDO CORRECTAMENTE CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT (CRM) EN GENERAL MOTORS COLMOTORES? MARÍA DEL PILAR ORTEGA Proyecto de Grado Asesor Carlos Alfredo Mansilla Profesor Facultad de Administración UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES FACULTAD DE ADMINISTRACIÓN BOGOTÁ D.C. 2003 TABLA DE CONTENIDO Pág. LISTA DE ANEXOS............................................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCCIÓN ................................................................................................................. 5 1 MARCO TEÓRICO ................................................................................................. 7 1.1 DEFINICIÓN DE CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT (CRM).... 7 1.2 HISTORIA DEL CRM ........................................................................................ 15 1.3 CASOS................................................................................................................. 16 1.4 ERRORES COMUNES EN LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DE CRM ..................... 22 1.4.1 Implementar CRM antes de establecer la estrategia hacia el cliente. .......... 23 1.4.2 Lanzar CRM antes de cambiar la organización. .......................................... 24 1.4.3 Asumir que tener más tecnología de CRM es mejor.................................... 25 1.4.4 Persiguiendo, no
    [Show full text]
  • Challenge-X 2008 DOE Merit Review Building on 19 Successful Years of Advanced Vehicle Technology Competitions Forrest Jehlik
    Advanced Vehicle Technology Competition: Challenge-X 2008 DOE Merit Review Building on 19 successful years of advanced vehicle technology competitions Forrest Jehlik This presentation does not contain any proprietary or confidential information Outline Current Competition Program Introduction/Overview Goals and Objectives Approach Collaborations/Interactions Performance Measures and Accomplishments Next Competition Program Introduction/Overview Summary Competition Introduction DOE has had a successful 19-year history of Advanced Vehicle Technology Competitions (AVTCs): 9 Methanol Marathon and Methanol Challenge (GM) 9 Natural Gas (GM), Ethanol (GM), and Propane Vehicle Challenges (DaimlerChrysler) 9 Sunrayce 1990 9 HEV Challenge and FutureCar (with PNGV-GM/Ford/DaimlerChrysler) 9 FutureTruck (GM/Ford/DaimlerChrysler) 9 Challenge X (final year-GM) EcoCAR (the next AVTC challenge) AVTCs integrate key DOE vehicle technologies Goals and Objectives Investigate, develop, and demonstrate a broad spectrum of advanced vehicle technologies aligned with DOE’s objectives: renewable fuels, energy diversity, advanced combustion, energy storage technology, electric machines, high power electronics, fuel cells, vehicle simulation modeling, and other critical technologies Explore technical solutions that minimize petroleum consumption and reduce well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions relative to current production counterparts Train the next generation of engineers to bring advanced technology vehicles into production while grooming future
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Climate Change
    Report Home Contact Downloads GRI Index UNGC Index Site Map Glossary Sustainability Report 2010/11 MATERIAL ISSUES Materiality Analysis Climate Change Climate Change Greenhouse Gas Emissions Overview Climate Change Risks and Opportunities Our Strategy: Blueprint for Sustainability Ford’s Sustainable 2010 HIGHLIGHTS... Technologies and Alternative Fuels Plan Offered four Ford vehicles that Began producing the Transit Reduced CO2 emissions from Announced development of a Progress and Performance achieve 40 mpg or better Connect Electric, the first of global operations by 5.6 solar energy system at the five electrified vehicles percent on a per-vehicle basis Michigan Assembly Plant Climate Change Policy since 2009 and Partnerships Electrification: A Closer Look Ford is committed to doing our share to prevent or reduce the potential for environmental, economic and social harm due to climate change. Perspectives on Water Sustainability Supply Chain We have a comprehensive, science-based global strategy to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from our products and processes while working cooperatively with the public and Vehicle Safety and Driver- private sectors to advance climate change solutions. We are taking a holistic approach to the Assist Technologies issue, recognizing that it affects all parts of our business and is interconnected to other important issues, from water availability and energy security to human rights. Sustaining Ford Perspectives on Sustainability We believe our commitment to addressing the climate change issue in a comprehensive and strategic way is one of the factors that has helped to transform our Company’s current and future products and prospects. Toolbox Our Commitment Mark Fulton and Bruce Print report Kahn Our climate change strategy is based on doing our share to stabilize carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations in the atmosphere at 450 ppm, the level generally accepted to avoid the most Global Head of Investment Download files serious effects of climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Fuels Advisor
    TENNESSEE Clean Fuels Advisor A quarterly publication from the partnership between the Clean Cities coalitions in Tennessee and the state of Tennessee. WINTER 2008 Bringing alternative fuels and hybrids to the forefront. Alt fuels = biodiesel, electricity, ethanol, hydrogen, natural gas and propane. Biofuels Enlightenment - Zenalgae Inside this Issue In a bold move to bring algae-based biodiesel pro- Algae oil production has been lauded by the Depart- duction to Tennessee in 2008, Northington Energy, LLC ment of Energy as having a very promising future. Al- Biofuels Enlightenment - Zenalgae 1 has acquired Zenalgae of Atlanta. though most recent algae-based research has been done State Provides Alt Fuels Innovations In the last couple of years, algae’s herculean oil-pro- in the private sector, the DOE said in 1998 that experi- Grants to Local Governments & ducing characteristics have been under the microscope ments bear out that algae may be the only viable method Public Universities 1 in more ways than one, as they can generate for producing enough fuel far more oil per acre than any of today’s to displace current world MLG&W Does the Right Thing 2 food or non-food crops. While soybeans gasoline usage. —which are the main resource used today Algae, which reproduc- City of Jackson - Sold on Biodiesel 2 in the U.S. to provide an oil for making es itself and its oils every six biodiesel—produce roughly 45-50 gallons of oil per acre, hours, has created excitement in the biodiesel industry The Science of Money, the Language of Business 2 algae has the potential to produce 1,000 gallons of oil because of its potential to produce much more substan- per acre..
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Trials for Powder Priming of Smc
    PLANT TRIALS FOR POWDER PRIMING OF SMC Hamid G. Kia, Bhavesh Shah, Christina Hicks1 GM R&D Center, 30500 Mound Road, Warren, MI 48090 Abstract Based on the information generated at GM R&D Center, six SMC formulations were developed and produced by SMC suppliers and subsequently molded into automotive body panels for powder primer application readiness tests. The panels were evaluated in the lab for shrinkage, moisture absorption, adhesion to the conductive coating, and powder application. Based on the results, all six formulations were approved for plant trials. The trials took place in Shreveport and Lordstown assembly plants. It was noted that the use of infrared heating to bake the powder is detrimental to SMC as it causes rapid heating of SMC substrate, resulting in a high flux of moisture in a short period of time. It was also learned that the experimental conductive coating improves the powder prime capability of SMC and allows powder priming after an extended exposure to the plant environment. Introduction The use of powder primers on SMC body panels has become a major challenge for the automotive industry. The driving force is that using powder primers in place of liquid primers reduces unwanted paint emissions and overspray waste. The downside is that powder primers are not compatible with the current high moisture absorbing plastics in general [1,2], and SMC materials in particular[3,4]. The body panels molded with SMC show paint popping in the bake oven of the powder primer, resulting in an unacceptable surface finish. In a previous study [5], a variety of SMC materials and conductive primers/sealers were evaluated for their ability to produce a pop free surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan Posconsumo Baterías Plomo Ácido
    PLAN DE GESTIÓN DE DEVOLUCIÓN DE BATERIAS USADAS PLOMO ÁCIDO Datos del Sistema de Recolección Selectiva Datos del Contacto No. Corriente de residuos Nombre del programa Subcategoria Tipo de plan Nit Correo electrónico Teléfono Expediente GDP0002 BUPA BATERIAS LOZANO VEHICULO INDIVIDUAL 19262626-3 [email protected] (1) 2555571 GDP0010 BUPA TECNIALARMAS LTDA VEHICULO INDIVIDUAL 890117413-1 [email protected] (5) 3610101 GDP0012 BUPA MOTOCICLETAS Y REPUESTOS S.A. MOTOS INDIVIDUAL 900054565 [email protected] (2) 4852236/37 GDP0015 BUPA INCOLMOTOS YAMAHA S.A MOTOS INDIVIDUAL 890916911-6 [email protected] (4) 3099010 GDP0016 BUPA PILAS Y BATERIAS SA VEHICULO INDIVIDUAL 830066009 [email protected] (1) 2255028 / (1)2507151 GDP0020 BUPA AKITA MOTOS S.A. MOTOS INDIVIDUAL 800030412-1 [email protected] (4) 2657606 GDP0026 BUPA SUZUKI MOTOR DE COLOMBIA S.A. MOTOS INDIVIDUAL 891410137-2 [email protected] (6) 3139600 GDP0027 BUPA IMPORTADORA CALI S.A. MOTOS INDIVIDUAL [email protected] (2) 4871500 GDP0029 BUPA BATERIAS WILLARD S.A. VEHICULO INDIVIDUAL 800022558 [email protected] (5) 3699999 GDP0030 BUPA INNOVATEQ S.A. VEHICULO INDIVIDUAL 830073570-0 [email protected] (1) 6581400 GDP0031 BUPA MAC JOHNSON CONTROLS COLOMBIA SAS - MAC JCI SAS VEHICULO INDIVIDUAL 900388600 [email protected] (2) 6911800 GDP0032 BUPA REBUJIA S.A MOTOS INDIVIDUAL 830500775 [email protected] 3174006976 GDP0033 BUPA COEXITO VEHICULO INDIVIDUAL 890300225 [email protected] (1) 6910500 GDP0035 BUPA AYA LTDA MOTOS INDIVIDUAL 816006987-1 [email protected] (6) 3300330 GDP0036 BUPA NATIONAL TRUCK SERVICE S.A. VEHICULO INDIVIDUAL [email protected] (1) 5761555 GDP0037 BUPA AUTOTECNICA COLOMBIANA S.A.-AUTECO MOTOS INDIVIDUAL 890900317-0 [email protected] / www.auteco.co/ambiental (4) 3068181 GDP0038 BUPA PELAEZ HERMANOS S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • FRIEDKIN Realty, LLC Youngstown's Premier Commercial Realtor 
    FRIEDKIN Realty, LLC Youngstown's Premier Commercial Realtor market street Powered by CLIFT MARKETING INC. © Broker Contact Information *Please contact local Broker Alan Friedkin 3223 Belmont Ave. Youngstown, OH 44505 FRIEDKIN Realty, LLC Youngstown's Premier Commercial Realtor Office: 330.759.2383 [email protected] www.friedkinrealtyllc.com Managed by: 155 West New York Avenue Suite 100 Southern Pines, NC 28387 Tel: 910.695.1909 www.cliftcommercial.com Powered by CLIFT MARKETING INC. © table of contents section I • property brochure property flyer market information section II • property maps aerial map standard site map traffic count map section III • demographics executive summary Powered by CLIFT MARKETING INC. © Market Street Youngstown, OH Name Market Street Location 2900 Market Street Youngstown, OH County Mahoning County Sq. Ft. 8,014 +/- Individual Price $175,000 Potential Uses offi ce PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS The 8,014 sq ft building is on a half (.50) acre lot with a “mixed use-community district (MU-C) zoning. This uniquely shaped corner lot building is designed to have full expo- sure on Market Street and Florida. Drive thru window is accessed on Florida Street off heavily traveled Market in Youngstown Ohio. Rear building parking and sidewalks on both Market and Florida lend convenience to pedestrian and vehicle clientele. Currently being leased by Chase Bank, this is an income producing property! 910.695.1909 330.759.2383 www.clift commercial.com www.friedkinrealtyllc.com Powered by CLIFT MARKETING INC. © FRIEDKIN Realty, LLC Youngstown's Premier Commercial Realtor Youngstown MAHONING COUNTY Mahoning County is a county located in the U.S. state of Ohio.
    [Show full text]