Safeguarding the Waterway Environment: Priorities for Research

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Safeguarding the Waterway Environment: Priorities for Research Safeguarding the waterway environment: Priorities for research Report of the AINA Working Group on the Environmental Impacts of Waterways Uses Foreword About AINA It is clear that there are gaps in our knowledge of the However, the benefits to be gained from undertaking The Association of Inland Navigation Authorities AINA’s key objectives are to: environmental impacts (positive and negative) of the research recommended in this report are such that (AINA) was set up in December 1996 with strong waterways use. This report goes some way towards new income will be created for re-investment in the encouragement from Government to provide, for the • provide a forum for the sharing of best practice, identifying those gaps and proposes specific measures waterways contributing to the sustainability of the first time ever, a single voice on waterway advice and expertise, to fill them for the benefit of waterway managers and waterways and their environs for the benefit of all. management issues. The broad purpose of AINA is to all waterway stakeholders. facilitate the management, maintenance and • represent the views of the Association to development of the inland waterways for navigation Government, EU, statutory agencies and other As the representative body for navigation authorities as an economic, environmental, recreational and relevant bodies, nation-wide, AINA believes it is well placed to procure social resource. and coordinate the required research work and to • develop links with its European neighbours, convert the outputs in the form of guidance for good AINA has 29 members including the three large • secure adequate investment in inland waterways, waterway management practice. Dr D J Fletcher CBE Government-sponsored navigation authorities – British Chairman Waterways, the Environment Agency, the Broads Funding the proposed work will inevitably be an issue. Authority – and also local authorities, drainage • promote public awareness of the value and potential Currently there is inadequate provision of funding for April 2003 commissioners, property development companies, port of inland waterways and gain support for their the management and operation of inland waterways authorities, original canal companies, national parks, development and conservation, and the need to integrate requirements for use the National Trust, and other charitable trusts. and the natural environment will place an even • enhance the amenity and environmental quality of greater demand on limited resources. Between them, AINA members own, operate and inland waterways, manage some 5,000 km of waterway representing almost a complete UK coverage. Each member has its • coordinate aspirations and to plan, in the context of own constitution, aims and objectives and, in many a national strategy, for exploiting the potential of cases, Acts of Parliament regulating the operation of inland waterways. its waterways. 1 Contents 1. Introduction 1. Introduction 1.1 Today, the inland waterways are used for 1.3 Specifically, the report seeks to: many purposes. Each use has the potential to 2. The impact of waterway management and use on the environment interact with the interests of the natural • identify the potential impacts of the many environment and may, if not well-managed, and varied uses of the inland waterways, 3. The approach detract from its value. In many cases this will and their related activities, on the natural not only affect efforts to conserve natural environment, 4. Socio-economic benefits resources; users themselves will experience a decrease in the attractiveness and interest of • identify gaps in our existing knowledge on 5. Legislation concerning nature conservation and waterways the waterway environment. the impacts of various uses, 6. Recommendations 1.2 This report reviews current knowledge of the • offer priorities for research, to be environmental impacts of the many different undertaken over the next decade, to fill the uses of the UK’s inland waterways. It major gaps in knowledge and thus Appendices identifies areas in which there is insufficient enhance the capability of waterway knowledge and proposes research to managers to achieve high and sustainable 1. Members of the Working Group remedy these shortcomings. environmental standards, in addition to delivering economic and social benefits. 2. Terms of reference 3. Bibliography 4. Negative and positive impacts of recreational and commercial uses of waterways, their maintenance and development 5. Matrices showing groups of flora and fauna and the nature of negative impacts for various uses/activities on British inland waterways 6. Glossary of terms 7. Nature conservation legislation and waterways in the UK 2 3 2. The impact of waterway management and use on 2.5 The successful integration of environmental 2.7 There is significant scope for introducing conservation with other waterways uses imaginative management tools to assist in the environment requires an adequate knowledge of the interpretation and enjoyment of the waterway ecology, its management and the natural environment for waterway users, effects of each use of the system on habitats without compromising environmental quality. 2.1 Waterways for Tomorrow1 identifies the • there has been much research into the and their populations of plants and animals. This will raise the status of the wildlife considerable potential the waterways have impacts of leisure and recreation uses on Many of the past conflicts between nature component in users’ minds and help to for a wide variety of uses and activities. Most canals, although there are still gaps in our conservation and waterway development justify its maintenance in cases where this have environmental impacts some of which knowledge, have arisen through uncertainty about the ultimately requires some restriction of other pose issues of real concern. Steering a Fresh effects of the changes being proposed. aspects of waterway use and development. 2 • there is insufficient objective information Course identifies the issues relevant to the available in relation to effects on rivers Greater ecological understanding and hence natural environment as: which are not hydraulically uniform and are ability to predict impacts and provide 2.8 Ultimately the yardstick for measuring self-scouring, mitigation for them, can go a long way success must be sustainable development - • the effects of navigation on the natural towards removing such conflicts. The need development that meets the needs of the environment, including those due to craft • better co-ordinated research is needed to for this greater ecological understanding is present without compromising the ability of movement and those due to creating and understand the direct and indirect effects the major driving force behind this report. future generations to meet their own needs. maintaining navigability, of the variety of waterways uses, In the case of the waterways, this can be • more work is needed to determine 2.6 The wildlife value of the waterway interpreted as making sure that the economic • the impacts of non-navigational uses, e.g. protocols for environmental impact environment is a major attraction to many growth of the waterways is achieved in such access for walking and development such assessments, users. Indeed, the natural environment is a manner that will not jeopardise, and could as the building of marinas stimulated by fundamental to the character of the even enhance, natural resource systems.4 • there is a perception that environmental the presence of navigation, waterways. impact assessment on navigable rivers is under-developed. • the need for environmental appraisal for all projects and full environmental impact assessments for major projects, 2.3 Before assessing the environmental impacts associated with the uses of waterways it is • the recognition of major gaps in important to understand that canals and river knowledge of the natural environment in navigations are inherently managed the context of waterways, and of the environments. Canals are wholly complexity and fragility of natural systems, man-made and navigable rivers have been subject to significant human modification. • the need to determine the ecological balance for those waterways with 2.4 It follows that any use of or development significant environmental interest while along waterways needs to be considered on understanding the maintenance the basis that the existing system is not requirements for a safe navigation, entirely natural. Moreover, continuing human intervention will often be necessary to • the need to balance the needs of maintain the quality of the habitats and navigation and wildlife, biodiversity which have developed in them. • the use of the waterways as a major resource for environmental education. 2.2 The Waterways for Tomorrow National 3 Conference report states that there is a need for more research to achieve greater understanding of the human impacts on the waterways environment. Specifically, the report states that: 1 4 Waterways for Tomorrow. Department of the Environment, Transport & The Regions, June 2000. Recreational Navigation and Nature. International Navigation Association (PIANC). Report of Working Group 12 of the Recreational Navigation Commission, 2000. 2 Steering a Fresh Course: A Strategy for the Inland Navigations of the United Kingdom. AINA 1999 3 Waterways for Tomorrow National Conference 19 March 2001. Conference Report, Department of the Environment, Transport & The Regions May 2001 4 5 3. The approach 3.7
Recommended publications
  • INLAND NAVIGATION AUTHORITIES the Following Authorities Are Responsible for Major Inland Waterways Not Under British Waterways Jurisdiction
    INLAND NAVIGATION AUTHORITIES The following authorities are responsible for major inland waterways not under British Waterways jurisdiction: RIVER ANCHOLME BRIDGEWATER CANAL CHELMER & BLACKWATER NAVIGATION The Environment Agency Manchester Ship Canal Co. Essex Waterways Ltd Anglian Region, Kingfisher House Peel Dome, Trafford Centre, Island House Goldhay Way, Orton Manchester M17 8PL Moor Road Peterborough PE2 5ZR T 0161 629 8266 Chesham T 08708 506 506 www.shipcanal.co.uk HP5 1WA www.environment-agency.gov.uk T: 01494 783453 BROADS (NORFOLK & SUFFOLK) www.waterways.org.uk/EssexWaterwaysLtd RIVER ARUN Broads Authority (Littlehampton to Arundel) 18 Colgate, Norwich RIVER COLNE Littlehampton Harbour Board Norfolk NR3 1BQ Colchester Borough Council Pier Road, Littlehampton, BN17 5LR T: 01603 610734 Museum Resource Centre T 01903 721215 www.broads-authority.gov.uk 14 Ryegate Road www.littlehampton.org.uk Colchester, CO1 1YG BUDE CANAL T 01206 282471 RIVER AVON (BRISTOL) (Bude to Marhamchurch) www.colchester.gov.uk (Bristol to Hanham Lock) North Cornwall District Council Bristol Port Company North Cornwall District Council, RIVER DEE St Andrew’s House, St Andrew’s Road, Higher Trenant Road, Avonmouth, Bristol BS11 9DQ (Farndon Bridge to Chester Weir) Wadebridge, T 0117 982 0000 Chester County Council PL27 6TW, www.bristolport.co.uk The Forum Tel: 01208 893333 Chester CH1 2HS http://www.ncdc.gov.uk/ RIVER AVON (WARWICKSHIRE) T 01244 324234 (tub boat canals from Marhamchurch) Avon Navigation Trust (Chester Weir to Point of Air) Bude Canal Trust
    [Show full text]
  • Boating on Sussex Rivers
    K1&A - Soo U n <zj r \ I A t 1" BOATING ON SUSSEX RIVERS NRA National Rivers Authority Southern Region Guardians of the Water Environment BOATING ON SUSSEX RIVERS Intro duction NRA The Sussex Rivers have a unique appeal, with their wide valleys giving spectacular views of Chalk Downs within sight and smell of the sea. There is no better way to enjoy their natural beauty and charm than by boat. A short voyage inland can reveal some of the most attractive and unspoilt scenery in the Country. The long tidal sections, created over the centuries by flashy Wealden Rivers carving through the soft coastal chalk, give public rights of navigation well into the heartland of Sussex. From Rye in the Eastern part of the County, small boats can navigate up the River Rother to Bodiam with its magnificent castle just 16 miles from the sea. On the River Arun, in an even shorter distance from Littlehampton Harbour, lies the historic city of Arundel in the heart of the Duke of Norfolk’s estate. But for those with more energetic tastes, Sussex rivers also have plenty to offer. Increased activity by canoeists, especially by Scouting and other youth organisations has led to the setting up of regular canoe races on the County’s rivers in recent years. CARING FOR OUR WATERWAYS The National Rivers Authority welcomes all river users and seeks their support in preserving the tranquillity and charm of the Sussex rivers. This booklet aims to help everyone to enjoy their leisure activities in safety and to foster good relations and a spirit of understanding between river users.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Report 2017–19
    Heritage Report 2017–19 September 2019 Dundas Aqueduct 2 Heritage Report 2017–19 Case Studies The following case studies are included in the Report: Managing our heritage Restoring a bridge-keeper’s hut, River Weaver 8 Derwent Mouth Lock repairs, Trent & Mersey Canal 9 Foxton Locks re-gating, Grand Union Leicester Line 10 Traffic lights at Golden Nook Bridge, Shropshire Union Canal 11 Safety railings at Marple Aqueduct, Peak Forest Canal 12 Cookley Forge Basin Bridge, Staffordshire & Worcestershire Canal 13 Repairs to Chirk Aqueduct, Llangollen Canal 14 Marple Yard cottages refurbished, Macclesfield Canal 16 Carpenter’s Road Lock restoration, Bow Back Rivers 17 Parapet repairs to Bedford Street Bridge, Caldon Canal 18 Repairs to Saint Thomas Bridge, Staffordshire & Worcestershire Canal 19 Curdworth Bridge repairs, Birmingham & Fazeley Canal 20 Towpath widening, Edgbaston Tunnel, Worcester & Birmingham Canal 21 Maintaining high standards Drone survey, Engine Arm Aqueduct, Birmingham New Main Line Canal 25 Repairs to Roundthorn Bridge, Llangollen Canal 26 Parapet alterations to Beeston Iron Lock footbridge, Shropshire Union Canal 27 Fox’s Malthouse revived, Gloucester Docks 28 Soulbury Pump House restored, Grand Union Canal 29 Heritage Apprentices, Monmouthshire & Brecon Canal, Wales 30 Surveying the old Line of the Oxford Canal 32 Recording Beeston and Bunbury locks, Shropshire Union Canal 33 Metal detectorists, Grand Union Aylesbury Arm 34 British Transport Commission sign recovered 34 Engagement Cataloguing wooden patterns at Ellesmere
    [Show full text]
  • Iwa Submission on the Environment Bill – Appendix A
    IWA SUBMISSION ON THE ENVIRONMENT BILL – APPENDIX A IWA VISION FOR SUSTAINABLE PROPULSION ON THE INLAND WATERWAYS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1. Recognising the UK Government’s strategy to reduce emissions from diesel and petrol engines, IWA formed its Sustainable Propulsion Group in 2019 to identify and monitor developments which will enable boats on the inland waterways to fully contribute to the Government’s stated aim of zero CO2 emissions by 2050. 2. The Group has identified a number potential solutions that it recommends should be progressed in order to ensure that boats used on the inland waterways do not get left behind in technological developments. These are outlined in more detail in this paper. 3. To ensure that the inland waterways continue to be sustainable for future generations, and continue to deliver benefits to society and the economy, IWA has concluded that national, devolved and local government should progress the following initiatives: Investment in infrastructure through the installation of 300 shore power mains connection charging sites across the connected inland waterways network. This would improve air quality by reducing the emissions from stoves for heating and engines run for charging batteries, as well as enabling a move towards more boats with electric propulsion. Working with navigation authorities, investment in a national dredging programme across the inland waterways to make propulsion more efficient. This will also have additional environmental benefits on water quality and increasing capacity for flood waters. Research and investment into the production, use and distribution of biofuels. This will be necessary to reduce the environmental impact of existing diesel engines which, given their longevity, will still be around until well after 2050.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues and Options Topic Papers
    Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council Local Development Framework Joint Core Strategy and Development Management Policies Development Plan Document Issues and Options Topic Papers February 2012 Strategic Planning Tameside MBC Room 5.16, Council Offices Wellington Road Ashton-under-Lyne OL6 6DL Tel: 0161 342 3346 Email: [email protected] For a summary of this document in Gujurati, Bengali or Urdu please contact 0161 342 8355 It can also be provided in large print or audio formats Local Development Framework – Core Strategy Issues and Options Discussion Paper Topic Paper 1 – Housing 1.00 Background • Planning Policy Statement 3: Housing (PPS3) • Regional Spatial Strategy North West • Planning for Growth, March 2011 • Manchester Independent Economic Review (MIER) • Tameside Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) • Tameside Strategic Housing Market Assessment 2008 (SHMA) • Tameside Unitary Development Plan 2004 • Tameside Housing Strategy 2010-2016 • Tameside Sustainable Community Strategy 2009-2019 • Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment • Tameside Residential Design Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) 1.01 The Tameside Housing Strategy 2010-2016 is underpinned by a range of studies and evidence based reports that have been produced to respond to housing need at a local level as well as reflecting the broader national and regional housing agenda. 2.00 National Policy 2.01 At the national level Planning Policy Statement 3: Housing (PPS3) sets out the planning policy framework for delivering the Government's housing objectives setting out policies, procedures and standards which Local Planning Authorities must adhere to and use to guide local policy and decisions. 2.02 The principle aim of PPS3 is to increase housing delivery through a more responsive approach to local land supply, supporting the Government’s goal to ensure that everyone has the opportunity of living in decent home, which they can afford, in a community where they want to live.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterway Dimensions
    Generated by waterscape.com Dimension Data The data published in this documentis British Waterways’ estimate of the dimensions of our waterways based upon local knowledge and expertise. Whilst British Waterways anticipates that this data is reasonably accurate, we cannot guarantee its precision. Therefore, this data should only be used as a helpful guide and you should always use your own judgement taking into account local circumstances at any particular time. Aire & Calder Navigation Goole to Leeds Lock tail - Bulholme Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom - 6.3m 2.74m - - 20.67ft 8.99ft - Castleford Lock is limiting due to the curvature of the lock chamber. Goole to Leeds Lock tail - Castleford Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom 61m - - - 200.13ft - - - Heck Road Bridge is now lower than Stubbs Bridge (investigations underway), which was previously limiting. A height of 3.6m at Heck should be seen as maximum at the crown during normal water level. Goole to Leeds Lock tail - Heck Road Bridge Length Beam Draught Headroom - - - 3.71m - - - 12.17ft - 1 - Generated by waterscape.com Leeds Lock tail to River Lock tail - Leeds Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom - 5.5m 2.68m - - 18.04ft 8.79ft - Pleasure craft dimensions showing small lock being limiting unless by prior arrangement to access full lock giving an extra 43m. Leeds Lock tail to River Lock tail - Crown Point Bridge Length Beam Draught Headroom - - - 3.62m - - - 11.88ft Crown Point Bridge at summer levels Wakefield Branch - Broadreach Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom - 5.55m 2.7m - - 18.21ft 8.86ft - Pleasure craft dimensions showing small lock being limiting unless by prior arrangement to access full lock giving an extra 43m.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Derwent Valley Consultation
    East Riding Local Plan Lower Derwent Valley Supplementary Planning Document Consultation Statement January 2018 1. Background ...................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Consultation ..................................................................................................................................... 2 3. Consultation Responses and Main Issues ......................................................................................... 3 4. Main changes to the SPD ................................................................................................................. 3 Appendix 1: Summary of representations ................................................................................................. 5 1 1. Background 1.1 In preparing Supplementary Planning Documents (SPDs), the Council is required to follow the procedures laid down in the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 1, and its own adopted Statement of Community Involvement (SCI) (2017)2. 1.2 Regulation 12 stipulates that before adoption of an SPD, the local planning authority (LPA) must prepare a statement setting out: • The persons that the LPA consulted when preparing the SPD; • A summary of the main issues raised by those persons; and • How those issues have been addressed in the SPD. 1.3 This Consultation Statement accompanies the Lower Derwent Valley SPD. The SPD supplements Policies ENV2 (Promoting a high quality landscape)
    [Show full text]
  • THE TUB BOAT Newsletter of the Bude Canal & Harbour Society
    THE TUB BOAT Newsletter of the Bude Canal & Harbour Society No. 58 Winter 2011 THE TUB BOAT Newsletter of the Bude Canal & Harbour Society No. 58 Winter 2011 CONTENTS Creaks from the Chair. 2 Membership Report . 3 Bude Canal Trust Report. 4 Your Society Needs You . 6 Future of the Higher Wharf . 7 Sherry and Mincepie event. 8 Producing 19th century boats in the 21st century . 8 Agnes. 9 Canal Recipes. .12 TRAC Photo Report. .. .15 Cover:The Bude Harbour and Breakwater Photo: Mike Moore 1 CREAKS FROM THE CHAIR A very happy and healthy new year to all our members and may 2012 bring achievements and satisfaction in as many of our ambitions and aspirations as one dare hope for. Here in Bude we continue to agitate for the unnecessarily elusive completion to the canal regeneration which would enable boats of a decent size to pass under Rodds Bridge and having done so, to continue unobstructed into the canal basin at Helebridge through the beautiful old canal bridge which carries the old A39 over both canal and river within a few yards of each other; it's a by-way these days but still much used by walkers. Our ambition for a slipway to enable such boats to access the canal in the first place is part of the ongoing campaign to save the site of Stapleton's shipyard from random development by Cornwall Council and become instead, a valuable waterside base for the gig and canoe clubs and an asset to Bude and Bude people. After some very wild and wet weather the canal is very full of water but the birds are all down the Bude end.
    [Show full text]
  • Romney Marsh Investigation REPORT
    AGRICULTURAL LA:--ID COMMISSION AGRICULTURE ACT 1947 Romney Marsh Investigation REPORT LONDON: HIS MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE 1949 TWO SHILLINGS N B T AGRICULTURAL LAND .COMMISSI\)N AGRICULTURE ACT 194/ Romney Marsh Investigation REPORT . LONDON: HIS MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFIC 1949 •CONTENTS Paragraphs Pages TI!RMS OF R.EPEllENCB ••• s SECTION I. INTRODUCTION 6 (i) Procedure -... 2-3 6 (ii) Description of Area •.• 4-9 7 SECTION II. SoiLS, SEA-DEFENCE AND DRAINAGE ••• 9 (i) Soils .•• 10-18 9 (ii) Sea-Defence ... 19 10 (iii) Drainage 20-35 11 SECTION ill. RoMNEY MARSH AGRICULTURE-PAST AND PRESENT 14 _ (i) Period 1866-1939 3~2 16 (ii) War Period (1939-1945) 43-46 17 (iii) The Present (1948) ••• 47-49 17 SECTION IV. A REsTATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM 18 SECTION V. POSSIBLE FARMING SYSTEMS FOR FULL AND EFFICIENT PRODUCTION IN RoMNEY MARSH 19 (i) Sheep Farming 54 19 (ii) Dairy Farming 55-56 20 (iii) Arable Farming, including:Marl<:et Gardening ... 57-59 20 (iv) Ley Farming .. ., ..• • • 60:..62 21 SECTION VI. THE TILLAGE AREA UNDER A LEY SYSTEM ••• 22 (i) Extent of Tillage Acreage ... 63-65 22 (ii) Fatting Pastures and the Plough ... 66-67 23 (iii) Cropping Problems •.. 68-70 23 (iv) Use of Machinery ... 71 23 SECTION Vll. LIVESTOCK UNDER A LEY SYSTEM ••• 24 SECTION Vill. PRE-REQmSITE CONDmONS FOR A LEY FARMING SYSTEM IN RoMNEY MARSH 25 (i) Farp1ing Efficiency ... 78-80 25 (ii) Labour and Housing 81-87 26 (iii) Buildings and Roads 88-93 . 28 (iv) Land Drainage 94-98 31 (v) Public Services 99-104 32 SECTION IX.
    [Show full text]
  • Coarse Fishing Close Season on English Rivers
    Coarse fishing close season on English rivers Appendix 1 – Current coarse fish close season arrangements The close season on different waters In England, there is a coarse fish close season on all rivers, some canals and some stillwaters. This has not always been the case. In the 1990s, only around 60% of the canal network had a close season and in some regions, the close season had been dispensed with on all stillwaters. Stillwaters In 1995, following consultation, government confirmed a national byelaw which retained the coarse fish close season on rivers, streams, drains and canals, but dispensed with it on most stillwaters. The rationale was twofold: • Most stillwaters are discrete waterbodies in single ownership. Fishery owners can apply bespoke angling restrictions to protect their stocks, including non-statutory close times. • The close season had been dispensed with on many stillwaters prior to 1995 without apparent detriment to those fisheries. This presented strong evidence in favour of removing it. The close season is retained on some Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) and the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads, as a precaution against possible damage to sensitive wildlife - see Appendix 1. This consultation is not seeking views on whether the close season should be retained on these stillwaters While most stillwater fishery managers have not re-imposed their own close season rules, some have, either adopting the same dates as apply to rivers or tailoring them to their waters' specific needs. Canals The Environment Agency commissioned a research project in 1997 to examine the evidence around the close season on canals to identify whether or not angling during the close season was detrimental to canal fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashby Canal Restoration
    Ashby Canal Restoration Snarestone to Measham BUSINESS PLAN SUMMARY May 2010 Ashby Canal Restoration Business Plan Summary Moira Furnace before restoration (c1950) Moira Furnace after restoration (May 2006) 2 Ashby Canal Restoration Business Plan Summary The Ashby Canal Restoration Project This project is to restore the Ashby Canal from its current terminus at Snarestone northwards for a distance of 4.5 km Awards to a new canal wharf at Measham. The power to acquire the necessary land and to construct and maintain the canal Leicestershire County Council was provided in October 2005 when the Secretary of State has received several awards for the length already restored at for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs confi rmed the Moira: Leicestershire County Council (Ashby de la Zouch Extension) Order made under the powers of the Transport and Works The Waterways Trust/ Act 1992. In making the Order the Secretary of State noted British Urban Regeneration that “the scheme is consistent with national, regional and Association Award for Tourism, 2002 local policies, would contribute signifi cantly to regeneration objectives and would produce considerable economic, The Civic Trust Special Award environmental and social benefi ts”. for Partnership (jointly with Conkers), 2003 The Inland Waterways History Association “Waterways Companion” Award, 1999 and 2006 The Ashby Canal was completed in 1804 and connected The Waterways Trust/ Moira in north western Leicestershire to the Coventry Canal at British Urban Regeneration Bedworth. It was used primarily to carry coal from the Ashby Association Award for Woulds mines to markets in the Midlands and the South. The Partnership, 2007 northern reaches of the canal were closed between 1944 and 1966 due to mining subsidence but in recent years the The Waterways Trust/ feasibility of restoration has been established and is strongly British Urban Regeneration Association Award for supported by local communities as a means of regeneration Innovation, 2007 and development.
    [Show full text]
  • Marshlink Days out Guide 2021
    Taster Tours About the Southeast Communities Marshlink Rail Partnership Days Out Guide 2021 Southeast Communities Rail Partnership (SCRP) connects communities to their vital community asset – their local station. We work across the southeast to help volunteers enrich the station environment through a wide variety of projects, for example through sustainable gardening and Historic Sea fronts art displays, festive decorations and so much more. With three miles of seafront from historic fishing huts to the bustle of arcades and funfairs Hastings has something for We improve integrated transport options by progressing access everyone. From the station head down to the seafront and to stations, working with our bus provider partners to increase follow The Stade Trail on foot or bike through the famous bus connectivity and encouraging active transport through fishing quarter, past the lifeboat station, East Hill funicular walking and cycling. We work with schools and local colleges, railway and the Fisherman’s museum. Afterwards perhaps providing educational workshops and we support diverse groups use the East Hill Funicular railway to reach Hastings Country to “Try a Train” through arranged visits to stations. Our line guides Park a fabulous nature reserve with stunning scenery just support social and economic development by encouraging right for a picnic. Set in 600 acres of ancient woodland and visitors to enjoy our region through sustainable travel. heathland the park lies in the High Weald AONB Find out how to get involved on our website: Medieval Towns www.southeastcrp.org Arriving in Rye you will find a well-preserved medieval town with half timbered houses and steep cobbled lanes.
    [Show full text]