DOCSLIB.ORG

Simi Hills 5—1 in Team Play

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Simi Hills 5—1 in Team Play MARCH 2020 Volume 25, Issue 3 SIMI HILLS 5—1 IN TEAM PLAY This year Olivas Links in Oxnard, San- However, reality hit ta Barbara Men’s club, Simi Hills and hard when Simi Glen Annie made up the 4 teams in traveled up the Group 2 of the SCGA 202 TEAM Play coast to S.B. the competition. Our team, captained by next weekend. San- our reigning club champion, Terry ta Barbara came Robuck, played each of these other alive and handed clubs once at home and once at their Simi Hills it’s first Terry Robuck course for a total of 6 weeks of golf. loss of the year, 31— 17. Heads jerked unceremoniously Our first opponent was Olivas Links out of the clouds. Simi finds itself in Men’s Club. This kickoff event was second place in the league, 3—1, be- Saturday January 18th and was at hind Glen Annie’s 4 and 0. home. The team absolutely smoked INSIDE THIS ISSUE Olivas in the team four ball events Then finally the Glen Annie games. (two man best ball), not losing a begin. Glen Annie has won the team Team Play 1, 3-5 single point! (15 wins and 1 draw.) play league 7 years in a row. That President’s Message 2 In the singles matches, our guys won quirky course across the freeway from Editors Comments 6 14 out of 16 matches. Total jaw- Sandpiper with the 6 Million Dollar Pace of Play policy 7 Tournament of Champions 8 dropping score was Simi Hills, 44— “Amphibian Walk” across the 12th, Tournament Results Olivas Links 4. Nice Start, eh? 13th and 14th fairways has been in- TUKWET 9—10 vincible in Team Play these past 6 Olivas may have still been shaken up March Home 10—12 years. the next weekend when the matches Upcoming Events were held at their ‘beach-adjacent’ Week one found us hosting them with March Events 13 course in Oxnard for round two. Total the hopes our course knowledge April 2020 14 after the day of golf, Simi Hills 31 Oli- would help slay the dragon. In the vas 17. The team starts the season 2 Singles matches, Simi took a lead go- Tournament Schedule 15 and 0. ing 18—14. The team cards were then WHS World Handicap System Instructions: 16—19 tallied and through teamwork and ca- The second Opponent was Santa Bar- maraderie our guys won the fourball bara Golf Club. Round one was at matches 11—5 to pull out a total 29 – home. The Team played steady, carry- 19 victory. Guess what, all tied at 4 ing on their excellent play from the and 1 between us and those frog loving weeks before. Simi took the match Glen Annians. 32—16 to move to 3—0 in the league. (continued on page 3) 1 courses. Thanks to all the play- ers that put their hearts and souls into this and many, many hours of practice time to be prepared for each match. Two months into the new year and we Thanks to Ash Danee for doing just hit a milestone of sorts. Our membership just yardage books for Glen Annie, hit 250 players. I say players because over half great help. (127) have played in at least one of our only four tournaments that we have run so far this year. Our first Pace of Play monitored home tourna- Thanks to the Simi Hills Golf Course and staff for ment was a complete success as the very last all their help and support throughout the years. group finished in 4 hours 45 minutes. The group The 2020 Board of Directors with the addition of in front of them was 4 hours 36 minutes. Thank Ash Danee, Keith Miler and Demetri Pagalidis you all that played and pushed to keep up with running tournaments has been nothing short of the group in front of you. I know our 4 ½ hr. goal amazing. Thanks to the whole Board for all your is attainable. hard work and effort you put into our club. In April we will start our Horse Races back up I would also like to thank Tim Crable for just an before our monthly meetings. Starting time is outstanding job on our Newsletter. I look forward 5:00 pm with a maximum of 24 players. Field will every month to read his work. I just hope the LA be split into two flights with a random draw of one Times does not find out about our talented author A player and one B player to make up each team. and makes him an offer. Thank you so much Tim Everyone playing together in an alternate shot for all you do. format. We play three holes with the lowest three aggregate scores plus ties moving to hole 4 for a Our regular season of Team Play is over, and playoff to widdle it down to three teams. Hole 5 we are heading to the playoffs for the second will be for all the money $25 dollars gets you time in 3 years. Our record this year was 5-1 with golf, cart and all the fun you can take. Stay after the biggest win that I have ever been part of, golf for our monthly meeting where you have a beating Glen Annie at their course 26 to 22. Glen chance to win ProV1’s and a free round of golf Annie has won their pool the last six years with cart. straight. Thanks to Terry Robuck for being a Captain and putting the lineups together every week. Terry arranged practice rounds and has a great feel for putting the right horses for the right Willie Melancon Ah, the old days. Proba- bly still playable, sort of. 2 (From Page One) TEAM PLAY Hills wins the Game 26—22 and the league title with 5 wins and 1 loss. So the final matches of this year’s league will come down to our guys making the long slog up past San- Well, he (Miler) did! And they (Miler and Adler) ta Barbara to Glen Annie Golf Course with a shot at did ! 26 to 22 Simi Hills Men’s golf club. The en- all the marbles. dangered California red-legged frogs, the benefi- ciaries of the “Amphibian Walk” at Glen Annie It started off great; Terry Robuck with Nabih were croaking their approval. CONGRATULA- Kouhry, and Willie Melancon with Godfrey Row- TIONS TEAM. land winning the first two team matches. Then the ebbs and flows started. By the time 7 of the 8 Four- Captain Robuck did an excellent job with the re- ball matches were done, the score was tied 7 to 7. cruitment, management, and pairing up of 18 guys each week. He also Down to the singles…. They couldn’t have started pushed the players on the importance better with 4 of our first 5 players, Robuck, Kourhy, of practice rounds. A real thankless Melancon and Robert Rodwell all taking wins! job, plus hours and hours of give- Godfrey Rowland played to a draw for a half. 10 away charity time with nothing but a points available and 9 of them were slid over to the crummy better tee time to show for it. Simi Hills side of the ledger. More back and forth Thank you, Terry! throughout the day with Glen Annie chipping away at Simi Hill’s lead until there was only 2 games left. NEXT: Once the 32 Group Champions are final- Simi has taken the overall match dormie at 24 to ized, the “Round of 32” will be played March 21st. 22 after 7 of the 8 Fourball games and 15 of the 16 (The ladder has not yet been released as of press singles matches were done. time.) If our team wins this round it will be eligible to play in the “Round of 16” on March 28th. Like a If Glen Annie took those last two games, they basketball ladder, the field gets cut in half each would win the Group title 26 to 22. If Keith Miler week until there are only 2 teams left. They play could win his singles match and the team of Miler for the championship at Monarch Dunes April 26, and Rick Adler could win their team match, Simi Simi Hills Mens vs Olivas Links GC Olivas Links GC vs Simi Hills Men's Golf club Fourball Matches 18 Holes Fourball Matches 18 Holes SATURDAY January 18, 2020 Played at: SIMI HILLS GOLF COURSE SATURDAY, January 25, 2020 Played at: OLIVAS LINKS GOLF COURSE SIMI HILLS MEN'S GOLF CLUB OLIVAS LINKS GOLF CLUB OLIVAS LINKS GOLF CLUB SIMI HILLS MEN'S GOLF CLUB Points Player Player Points Points Player Player Points 2 Willie Melancon + Mike Dom vs. Maykel Ghorbanzadeh + Brad Kane Maykel Ghorbanzadeh + Dave Stoltz vs. Terry Robuck + Willie Melancon 2 1 Mario Posadas + Robert Rodwell vs. Dave Stoltz + Kevin Rennie 1 2 Terry Porvin + Brad Kane vs. Nabih Khoury + Mario Posadas 2 Godfrey Rowland + Vinod Chhabra vs. Edward Nagelman + Ken Shugerman Kevin Rennie + Ken Shugerman vs. Robert Rodwell + Godfrey Rowland 2 2 Ramesh Lal + Richard Silagy vs. Matt Lim + Robin Anderson Dean Lundquist + Matt Lim vs. Joel Harriott + Mark Porter 2 2 Mark Porter + Chris Denove vs. Theo Fallati + David Fletcher Robin Anderson + Theo Fallati vs. Richard Silagy + Chris Denove 2 2 Dan Stockton + Gary Weller vs. Jan Hethcock + Francisco Almaguer Jan Hethcock + David Fletcher vs. Dan Stockton + John Van Diepen 2 2 Warren Hogge + Erik Dahl vs. Roger Bowen + Daniel Fish 2 Gurmail Sajjan + Brad Zlomke vs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality
    January 2018 CHAPTER 4 Environmental Analysis SECTION 4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality 4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This section of the EIR analyzes the potential environmental effects on hydrology and water quality from implementation of the proposed project. Data for this section were taken from the Glendale Emergency Plan, Glendale General Plan Safety Element Technical Background Report, the EPA, and Upper Los Angeles River Watershed Watermaster. Full reference-list entries for all cited materials are provided in Section 4.8.5 (References). 4.8.1 Environmental Setting Surface Water The proposed SGCP area is within the Los Angeles River watershed, which includes 834 square miles of Los Angeles County. The eastern portion of the watershed spans from the Santa Monica Mountains to the Simi Hills and in the west from the Santa Susana Mountains to the San Gabriel Mountains. The watershed encompasses and is shaped by the Los Angeles River. The river flows adjacent to the western and southern borders of the proposed SGCP area in a concrete lined channel. The upper portion of the watershed (Upper Los Angeles River Watershed), where the proposed SGCP area is located, contains a network of flood control dams and debris basins that flow to the Los Angeles River (LACDPW 2016). The Upper Los Angeles River watershed is home to approximately 2.3 million people, mostly in high density development in the interior valleys and foothills. Precipitation within the Upper Los Angeles River watershed typically falls in a few major storm events between November and March to an average of 19 inches per year.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Chumash-Style Pictograph Sites in Fernandeño Territory
    THREE CHUMASH-STYLE PICTOGRAPH SITES IN FERNANDEÑO TERRITORY ALBERT KNIGHT SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY There are three significant archaeology sites in the eastern Simi Hills that have an elaborate polychrome pictograph component. Numerous additional small loci of rock art and major midden deposits that are rich in artifacts also characterize these three sites. One of these sites, the “Burro Flats” site, has the most colorful, elaborate, and well-preserved pictographs in the region south of the Santa Clara River and west of the Los Angeles Basin and the San Fernando Valley. Almost all other painted rock art in this region consists of red-only paintings. During the pre-contact era, the eastern Simi Hills/west San Fernando Valley area was inhabited by a mix of Eastern Coastal Chumash and Fernandeño. The style of the paintings at the three sites (CA-VEN-1072, VEN-149, and LAN-357) is clearly the same as that found in Chumash territory. If the quantity and the quality of rock art are good indicators, then it is probable that these three sites were some of the most important ceremonial sites for the region. An examination of these sites has the potential to help us better understand this area of cultural interaction. This article discusses the polychrome rock art at the Burro Flats site (VEN-1072), the Lake Manor site (VEN-148/149), and the Chatsworth site (LAN-357). All three of these sites are located in rock shelters in the eastern Simi Hills. The Simi Hills are mostly located in southeast Ventura County, although the eastern end is in Los Angeles County (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • 3.6 Geology and Soils
    BIOGAS RENEWABLE GENERATION PROJECT FINAL INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURE March 9, 2018 3.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This section describes existing geology and soils of the project site and is based on findings documented in the following reports: • Geo-Logic Associates (GLA; 2012) Geotechnical Report – Proposed Landfill Expansion, March. • Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County – Planning Section and AECOM (2014) Draft Environmental Impact Report, March. • Stantec (2016) Geotechnical Investigation Report, provided as Appendix D of this document. 3.6.1 Setting Regional Hydrogeology According to the California Department of Water Resources (CDWR) Bulletin 118 Report, the Project site is not located within a mapped groundwater basin. The closest groundwater basin is the San Fernando Valley Groundwater Basin of the South Coast Hydrologic Region (4-12), located to the west of the Project site. The basin is approximately 226 square miles and is bounded on the north and northwest by the Santa Susana Mountains, on the north and northeast by the San Gabriel Mountains, on the east by the San Rafael Hills, on the south by the Santa Monica Mountains and Chalk Hills, and on the west by the Simi Hills (DWR, 2004). Regional Geology The Project site is located in the northwestern portion of the Transverse Range Geomorphic Province in the southwestern part of California. The region is separated by an east-west trending series of steep mountain ranges and valleys, sub-parallel to faults branching from the San Andreas Fault. The Project site resides in the portion of the Province drained by the Los Angeles River.
    [Show full text]
  • Chatsworth Nature Preserve/Reservoir
    HISTORIC RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Final 6/2/15 - Prepared by Carla Bollinger Chatsworth Nature Preserve/Reservoir Why is this individual resource or neighborhood significant? Chatsworth Nature Preserve (CNP) is a representation of San Fernando Valley (SFV)-Los Angeles history from pre-historic through the 20th Century. This is the last remaining opening space, 1325 acres, on the valley floor with rolling hills, native plants and oak trees, a vision of what the SFV once looked like with numerous cultural-historic landmarks. Native American site from pre-historic Middle Period (1500 - 500 AD), through Pre-Mission period: A Gabrielino and Ventureno-Chumash, historical district Mission Period: (1769 to 1833-1836) Spanish expedition and establishment of California Missions through the time period the Missions were secularized by the Mexican government. Mexican Period: (1821-1848) Rancheros, cattle and sheep ranch, Rancho Ex-Mission San Fernando, Mexican land grant by Governor Pio Pico to Eulogio de Celis. Pioneering/Homesteading or American Period: (1848 - early 1900’s) Gold discovery north of San Fernando Mission in Placerita Canyon, 1848; California Statehood in 1850; and the Homestead Act, 1862, all contributed to the SFV changes from cattle and sheep ranching to agricultural, dry farming. 20th Century: Owens Valley-Los Angeles Aqueduct, building of the Chatsworth Reservoir, early Movie/TV Filming, and the development of commercial industry and growth of residential development surrounding the CNP-Reservoir. Native American Convergence site. The CNP and surrounding area was a convergence location for Ventureno-Chumash, Gabrielino, and Fernandeho Native Americans to gather, trade, inter-marry, and hold ceremonies. Momonga Village (Fernandeno ) or Rancheria de las Piedras (Gabrielino/Tongva) Location: Northeastern Simi Hills through Santa Susana Pass to Stoney Point on the west, and south to the north end of Chatsworth Reservoir.
    [Show full text]
  • Burro Flats Cultural District NRHP Nomination
    Exhibit 2 – Burro Flats Cultural District NRHP Nomination NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Burro Flats Cultural District__(Public Version) ____________________ Other names/site number: ___________________________________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: ___N/A___________________________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: __5800 Woolsey Canyon Road (Santa Susanna Field Laboratory)________ City or town: _Canoga Park__ State: _California_ County: _Ventura_ Not For Publication: Vicinity: X X ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Burro Flats Cultural District__(Public Version) ____________________ Other names/site number: ___________________________________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: ___N/A___________________________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: __5800 Woolsey Canyon Road (Santa Susanna Field Laboratory)________ City or town: _Canoga Park__ State: _California_ County: _Ventura_ Not For Publication: Vicinity: X X ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation
    [Show full text]
  • Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District Board of Directors Meeting a GENDA Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 6:30 P.M
    Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District Board of Directors Meeting A GENDA Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 6:30 p.m. Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District 4201 Guardian Street, Simi Valley, CA 93063 • Activity Room 3 (805) 584-4400 • www.rsrpd.org Welcome to a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District. The Park District welcomes citizen participation. There are multiple ways you may attend, participate or view a Board Meeting, including: In Person. You may attend the Board Meeting in person at the time and location listed above. Via Zoom. https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82042003997?pwd=MEc3NytCR3BISXAxeXhXVlArc1ZTdz09 Via Telephone. Please call 1-669-900-6833 and enter Meeting ID: 820 4200 3997 and Passcode: 772212. View Via YouTube. Click www.rsrpd.org then “Board Meeting Videos” on the District homepage. If you’d like to attend in person and would like to speak, please fill out a green Speaker Card, available at the sign-in table, and hand the card to the Recording Secretary or Board of Directors. If the item you would like to speak about is not on the Agenda, be prepared to speak when the Board Chair calls for “Public Discussion”. The Chair will call the names appearing on the Speaker Cards. If you do not hear your name called, please make this fact known, so that you may be recognized. If the item you would like to speak about is on the Agenda, the Board Chair will announce the item, request a report from staff, ask Board Members if they have questions or comments, and then ask if there are others who wish to comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Bna0271478 7 Hdmsp001858069 Ii
    i t L erna! Lettcr JI!L . April 2, 1979 TO o , . 4 F'lOV : f! .# Those Listed R . Kaldor 731, 071-LB24 sunfect . Summary Information Draft for D&D Envionmental Study Attached to this letter is the initial draft of the summary information to be included in the envionmental study for post D&D use of the facilities at Santa Susana . Additional informa- tioned will be included as it is acquired, particularly unde r the "Demography" heading . Many of the figures need to be refined but are used here in order to illustrate what will be included . Comments and criticisms are welcome but are preferred within the next week . R . Kal dor Product Support Those Listed : S . Berger J . W . Carroll R . S . Hart L . G . Kellogg W . D . Kittinge r J . D . Moore M . E . Remley E . San k R . J . Tuttle B . F . Ureda BNA0271478 7 HDMSP001858069 II . DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMEN T A . LOCATIO N The areas and facilities for which an unrestricted use classification is requested are located at the Energy Systems Group ' s Nuclear Development Field Laboratory (NDFL) . The Rocketdyne Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) is located adjacent to the NDFL site . Both areas are controlled by Rockwell International Corporation . The NDFL is located in the southeastern portion of Ventura County, adjacent to the Los Angeles County line . The site is approximatel y 29 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles . The location is shown in Figures IIA-1, IIA-2, and IIA-3 . Its distance from, and directional relationship to various surrounding populated communities is : Santa Susana - 3 miles ( 4 .8 km) nort h Susana Knolls - 3 miles (4 .8 km) northeast Simi - 5 miles ( 8 .0 km) northwest Canoga Park - 6 miles ( 9 .6 km) east-southeast Chatsworth - 6 miles (9 .6 km) east-northeast Calabasas - 7 miles (11.3 km) south Woodland Hills - 7 miles (12 .9 km) southeas t Thousand Oaks - 8 .5 miles (13 .7 km) southwes t The site is situated in a low-lying basin among the Simi Hills and is relatively isolated from the surrounding communities .
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Profile of Simi Valley
    Waturai History Museum UCt-Q-A R L Of Los Angeles County Invertebrate Paleontology r CHAPTER NINE -&VJU1 fth s cb&yz-f-fy. (roocl fodi**) ^. GEOLOGIC PROFILE OF SIMI VALLEY Richard L. Squires, Ph.D California State University, Northridge imi Valley is in the western part of a region called the Transverse deposited in the last 100,000 years or so. The sedimentary rock units and Ranges province. This province extends for a distance of about 300 overlying unconsolidated sediments are listed below in proper order, along miles (483 km), from the most westerly pan of the southern with their respective geologic time intervals. Nonmarine refers to river SCalifornia coast at Point Arguello in Santa Barbara County (near the deposits, and marine refers to ocean deposits. town of Lompoc), to just beyond the eastern end of the Little San Bernardino Alluvium (nonmarine, Holocene, last 10,000 years) Mountains in central Riverside County. In the vicinity of Simi Valley, the Terrace deposits (nonmarine, upper Pleistocene, about province is about 40 miles (65 km) wide. 500,000 to 10,000 years) The Transverse Ranges province is geologically very complex and com- Saugus Formation (marine to nonmarine, upper Pliocene to prises chains of mountain ranges that extend east-west and are separated by lower Pleistocene, 3 to 1 million years) valleys. Simi Valley is one of these valleys. The Transverse Ranges province Modelo Formation (marine, middle to upper Miocene, 12 to 6 is divisible into over a dozen smaller regions, and one of these is the Ventura million years) basin. The western half of the basin is presently covered by the Pacific Calabasas Formation (marine, middle Miocene, 13 million Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Malibu Coast California
    AMERICAN VITICULTURE AREA PETITION FOR MALIBU COAST CALIFORNIA WRITTEN & SUBMITTED BY RALPH JENS CARTER ON BEHALF OF THE WINE GRAPE GROWERS OF THE AREA INTRODUCTION The Malibu Coast proposed AVA is in southwestern Los Angeles County and southeast corner of Ventura County, California, and much of it lies within the Santa Monica Mountain National Recreational Area (SMMNRA) It is bounded on the north by Newbury Park, Greenwich Village, Thousand Oaks, Westlake Village, Agoura Hills and a total of about 20 urban development exits along the Highway 101 corridor. On the east lie the cities of Beverly Hills and Hollywood. To the south is the Pacific Ocean and on the west are the cities of Oxnard and Camarillo. The area is approximately 46 miles long and 8 miles wide. The Malibu Coast proposed AVA is comprised of privately owned lands evenly scattered throughout the SMMNRA and amounts to less than 53% of the land area within the Recreational Area. There are two pre-existing AVA's in the general area: Saddle Rock Malibu (2090 acres)and Malibu-Newton Canyon (850 acres). The Malibu Coast proposed AVA comprised approximately 94,060 acres of privately owned lands evenly scattered throughout the 182,000 acre Santa Monica Mountain Recreational Area. This equates to less than 53% of the land area within the Recreational Area. The Santa Monica Mountains are unique example of a mediterranean ecosystem. Mediterranean areas are close to the sea but usually also close to a considerable land mass. The Santa Monica Mountains have a history of continuous human occupation dating back more than 8000 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District Board of Directors Meeting a GENDA Thursday, May 6, 2021 at 6:30 P.M
    Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District Board of Directors Meeting A GENDA Thursday, May 6, 2021 at 6:30 p.m. Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District 4201 Guardian Street, Simi Valley, CA 93063 • Activity Room 3 (805) 584-4400 • www.rsrpd.org (Meeting To Be Held Via Zoom) Welcome to a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District. The Park District welcomes citizen participation. In compliance with revised Public Meeting laws enacted by the State of California, as well as Ventura County Public Health Orders’ social distancing requirements which restricts gatherings to slow the spread of the novel Coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic, this meeting will be held via Zoom by Board Members, District Staff, and the Public. There will be no in-person attendance by the public. The live-streamed meeting is also available on our website at www.rsrpd.us - click “Board Meeting Videos” on the homepage. Members of the public who wish to speak or provide comments are encouraged to attend the meeting virtually via Zoom by clicking the following link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82149876521?pwd=cWVWSmorcGdUUXZQNlNZdFAvcWZGQT09 Meeting ID: 821 4987 6521. Passcode: 233769. You may also access the meeting telephonically by calling 1-669-900-6833. Meeting ID: 821 4987 6521. Passcode: 233769. At the appropriate time, in accordance with the agenda, the Chair of the Board will request that individuals who wish to speak identify themselves and make their comments. Members of the public may also participate by providing written comments to the Board by sending an email to [email protected] by Thursday, May 6, 2021 at 5:00pm.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Nomenclature of the Central Santa Monica Mountains, Los Angeles County, California
    Stratigraphic Nomenclature of the Central Santa Monica Mountains, Los Angeles County, California GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1457-E Stratigraphic Nomenclature of the C entral Santa Monica Mountains, Los Angeles County, California By R. F. YERKESawd R. H. CAMPBELL With a section on AGE OF THE CONEJO VOLCANICS By D. L. TURNER and R. H. CAMPBELL CONTRIBUTIONS TO STRATIGRAPHY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1457-E UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1979 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. William Menard, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Yerkes, R. F., 1923- Stratigraphic nomenclature of the central Santa Monica Mountains, Los Angeles County, California. (Contributions to stratigraphy) (Geological Survey Bulletin 1457-E) Bibliography: p. E30-E31. 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Tertiary. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic Cretaceous. 3. Geology, Stratigraphic Nomenclature California Santa Monica Mountains. I. Campbell, Russell H., 1928- joint author. II. Title. III. Series. IV. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Bulletin 1457-E. QE75.B9 no. 1457-E [QE691] 557.3'08s [557.94'93] 79-10231 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington, D. C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-03180-9 CONTENTS Page Abstract _____________________________________________ El Introduction __________________________________________ 1 Previous work ___________________________________ 2 Present report ______________________________________ 4 Stratigraphic
    [Show full text]