DOCSLIB.ORG

NASA and General Aviation. NASA SP-485. INSTITUTION National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NASA and General Aviation. NASA SP-485. INSTITUTION National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC DOCUMENT RESUME ED 272 386 SE 046 880 AUTHOR Ethell, Jeffrey L. TITLE NASA and General Aviation. NASA SP-485. INSTITUTION National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC. Scientific and Technical Information Branch. PUB DATE 86 NOTE 137p. AVAILABLE FROMSuperintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. PUB TYPE Reference Materials General (130) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC06 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Accident Prevention; *Aerospace Industry; *Aviation Mechanics; *Aviation Technology; Engines; Power Technology; Safety; Science Education; Science History; *Space Sciences; *Technological Advancement; Technology IDENTIFIERS *General Aviation; *National Aeronautics and Space Administration ABSTRACT A detailed examination of the nature and function of general aviation and a discussion of how the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) helps keep it on the cutting edge of technology are offered in this publication. The intricacies of aerodynamics, energy, and safety as well as the achievements in aeronautical experimentation are presented. Topic areas include: (1) what is general aviation; (2) aerodynamic efficiency; (3) internal combustion engines; (4) turbine engines; (5) commuter aviation; (6) general aviation utility; (7) safety improvements; (8) electronics and avionics; and (9) the future of general aviation. The field of general aviation is upheld as a dynamic and vital national asset to the United States economy and leadership potential. (ML) **********************************a************************************ Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** NASA SP -485 NASA and General Aviation Jeffrey L. Ethell Scientific and Technical Information Branch 1986 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC 3 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ethel!, Jeffrey L NASA and general aviation. (NASA SP ; 485) 1.Private flying United States. 2 United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration I Title II. Series. TL721.4 E84 1986 629.133' 340422 85-31931 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 4 CONTENTS FOREWORD vii PREFACE ix 1 What Is General Aviation? 1 2Aerodynamic Efficiency 7 3Internal Combustion Engines 21 4Turbine Engines 51 5Commuter Aviation 63 6General Aviation Utility 73 7 Safety Improvements 79 8Electronics and Avionics 107 9The Future 127 ABOUT THE AUTHOR 131 v FOREWORD In 1915 a far-seeing United States Congress created the Na- tional Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA). Its purpose: improve and develop American aviation, which was then in its in- fancy. Today NACA's successor, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), has a much broader mission. But as its name implies, NASA is still very much involved with aeronautics. Yet until now, the agency's important role in "general aviation" has lever been fully told. I find this rather astonishing, for in sheer numbers of planes, pilots, and air operations, general aviation is by far the largest single component of all U.S. aviation--civil and military. NASA and General Aviation should do much to correct any possible misconception about the fine working relationship be- tween the agency and the aircraft industry. Though perhaps not generally known, the industry continues to rely heavily on the basic technology that NASA and its predecessor have de'..2loped during decades of research.Itis this traditional government. industry relationship that propelled America to a position of leadership in world aviation and space. But as the author clearly points out, our leadership in some key technical areas is eroding. This is especially true in general avia- tion. While it is the biggest segment of a-9 total aircraft industry, it still gets the smallest share of any federal funding budgeted for aerospace research. Foreign nations, on the other hand, have different priorities. Several of them are striving for preeminence in all fields of fl'ght. Consequently, a subsidized foreign industry puts U.S. manufac- turers at a distinct disadvantage. If we wish to compete effectively in world markets, then we must dedicate the talent and resources necessary to advance our technology. The selection of Jeff Ethell to tell this enlightening story is com- mendable. Few full-time authors have the skills to communicate technical subjects in other than highly complex terms. Jeff Ethell, an experienced pilot and an accomplished writer, is such a profes- sional. vii Besides exploring the intricacies of aerodynamics, energy, and safety, the author reveals a number of little-known facts about some truly incredible achievements in the history of aeronautical experimentation and progress. He not only details what NASA and NACA have done for general aviation over the years, but he also treats us to an impressive look ahead. Anticipatedimprovementsintomorrow'saircraftutility, whether the use is for business, agriculture, or some other com- mercial application, appear just as exciting as the scientific developments in technology. New concepts in composite materials and metallic structures, along with revolutionary advances in systems integration, will pro- vide the next generation of aircraft with significantly higher per- formance, reliability, and efficiency. And new innovations in com- puter technology and production techniques may result in a total- ly new kind of airplane. But to achieve these goals will take more than the imagination and ingenuity of design engineers and builders. It will take broad- based public support, a recognition that general aviation is a ma- jor contributor to America's economic security. This is a splendid work, the definitive book on the many technical wonders of a dynamic and vital national asset. That is why I hope it receives the widest exposure possible. In fact,it should be required reading for anyone with even a modicum of in- fluence in shaping our nation's future. James R. Grcenvic.,nd Retired Senio- Vice President Gates Learje Corporation PREFACE General aviation remains the single most misunderstood sector of aeronautics in the United States. Airline companies make the news on a regular basis and travel on the major carriers is taken for granted, yet they comprise but 10% of all U.S. nonmilitary flight operations. The remainder belongs to general aviation, one of the major keys to American business success. This book will give you a detailed look at how general aviation functions and how NASA helps keep it on the cutting edge of technology in airfoils, airframes, commuter travel, environmental concerns, engines, propellers, air traffic control, agricultural development, electronics, and safety. No doubt some of you will be surprised to find that there is so much activity in general avia- tion. This is not simply the weekend pilot who wants to take a spin, but also the businessman who relies on aircraft to get him where he is going whet. he wants to go, the corporation that wants sophisticated jet transportation for its executives, the family that wants to travel where no major airline terminal exists, the farmer who wishes to have his crops protected, the mission pilot who transports spiritual and physical aid over &arise jungle terrain, the medivac team that requires rapid transportation for an accident victim or transplant recipient. And the list of benefits goes on. If there was ever a time when NASA's aid was pivotal to general aviation's survival, it is now. Come along with me, as we take a look into a fascinating and seldom seen world through the eyes of NASA and its numerous programs. s IX CHAPTER 1 WHAT IS GENERAL AVIATION? few people are aware of it, general aviation, all civil flying activity except airline operations, accounts for 98 per- cent of the nation's 215 000 aircraft and 96 percent of its 815 000 pilots. It is by far the most active and the most diverse of all aviation operations. When combining the amount of airline and general aviation flying, the airlines account for only 10 percent of the total hours and operations flown. And the majority, around 80 percent by some estimates, of general aviation flyingis for business purposes, serving all of the nation's 14 746 airports while theairlinesreach only 733 (or 5 percent). The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) includes air taxi and commuter aircraft under its general aviation research pro- grams while excluding rotorcraft. Though the public conception of general aviation is that of private owners flying for pleasure, the opposite is true, particularly in these days of less discretionary income. It includes every kind of piloted airborne vehicle from ultralight powered hang gliders and balloons to airline-size corporate jets. Not only does the business community rely very heavily on general aviation to function, but the U.S. balance of trade is heavi- ly dependent on the export of aircraft. In 1979, civil aircraft sales resulted in a net positive contribution of $10 billion to our trade balance. In the past 20 years, the U.S. share of total exports of the major industrialized nations has dropped oy almost one-third, while U.S. civil aircraft export sales have increased ninefold, and now sustain over 60 percent of the total civil aircraft work force. I 9 NASA and General Aviation More than 90 percent of all general aviation aircraft in the world originated in U.S. factories, and the market
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Failure Analysis of Gas Turbine Blades in a Gas Turbine Engine Used for Marine Applications
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology MultiCraft ENGINEERING, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2014, pp. 43-48 SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY www.ijest-ng.com www.ajol.info/index.php/ijest © 2014 MultiCraft Limited. All rights reserved Failure analysis of gas turbine blades in a gas turbine engine used for marine applications V. Naga Bhushana Rao1*, I. N. Niranjan Kumar2, K. Bala Prasad3 1* Department of Marine Engineering, Andhra University College of Engineering, Visakhapatnam, INDIA 2 Department of Marine Engineering, Andhra University College of Engineering, Visakhapatnam, INDIA 3 Department of Marine Engineering, Andhra University College of Engineering, Visakhapatnam, INDIA *Corresponding Author: e-mail: [email protected] Tel +91-8985003487 Abstract High pressure temperature (HPT) turbine blade is the most important component of the gas turbine and failures in this turbine blade can have dramatic effect on the safety and performance of the gas turbine engine. This paper presents the failure analysis made on HPT turbine blades of 100 MW gas turbine used in marine applications. The gas turbine blade was made of Nickel based super alloys and was manufactured by investment casting method. The gas turbine blade under examination was operated at elevated temperatures in corrosive environmental attack such as oxidation, hot corrosion and sulphidation etc. The investigation on gas turbine blade included the activities like visual inspection, determination of material composition, microscopic examination and metallurgical analysis. Metallurgical examination reveals that there was no micro-structural damage due to blade operation at elevated temperatures. It indicates that the gas turbine was operated within the designed temperature conditions. It was observed that the blade might have suffered both corrosion (including HTHC & LTHC) and erosion.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress and Challenges in Liquid Rocket Combustion Stability Modeling
    Seventh International Conference on ICCFD7-3105 Computational Fluid Dynamics (ICCFD7), Big Island, Hawaii, July 9-13, 2012 Progress and Challenges in Liquid Rocket Combustion Stability Modeling V. Sankaran∗, M. Harvazinski∗∗, W. Anderson∗∗ and D. Talley∗ Corresponding author: [email protected] ∗ Air Force Research Laboratory, Edwards AFB, CA, USA ∗∗ Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA Abstract: Progress and challenges in combustion stability modeling in rocket engines are con- sidered using a representative longitudinal mode combustor developed at Purdue University. The CVRC or Continuously Variable Resonance Chamber has a translating oxidizer post that can be used to tune the resonant modes in the chamber with the combustion response leading to self- excited high-amplitude pressure oscillations. The three-dimensional hybrid RANS-LES model is shown to be capable of accurately predicting the self-excited instabilities. The frequencies of the dominant rst longitudinal mode as well as the higher harmonics are well-predicted and their rel- ative amplitudes are also reasonably well-captured. Post-processing the data to obtain the spatial distribution of the Rayleigh index shows the existence of large regions of positive coupling be- tween the heat release and the pressure oscillations. Dierences in the Rayleigh index distribution between the fuel-rich and fuel-lean cases appears to correlate well with the observation that the fuel-rich case is more unstable than the fuel-lean case. Keywords: Combustion Instability, Liquid Rocket Engines, Reacting Flow. 1 Introduction Combustion stability presents a major challenge to the design and development of liquid rocket engines. Instabilities are usually the result of a coupling between the combustion dynamics and the acoustics in the combustion chamber.
    [Show full text]
  • UAT-ARC Final Report
    Unleaded AVGAS Transition Aviation Rulemaking Committee FAA UAT ARC Final Report Part I Body Unleaded AVGAS Findings & Recommendations 17 February 2012 UAT ARC Final Report – Part I Body February 17, 2012 Table of Contents List of Figures …………………………………………………………………………… 6 Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………… 8 1. Background …………………..……………………………………………………. 11 1.1. Value of General Aviation………………………………………………… 11 1.2. History of Leaded Aviation Gasoline…………………………………….. 13 1.3. Drivers for Development of Unleaded Aviation Gasoline……………… 14 2. UAT ARC Committee ……………………………………………………………… 16 2.1. FAA Charter……………………………………………………………….. 16 2.2. Membership ………………..…………………………………………….. 17 2.3. Meetings, Telecons, & Deliberations…………….……………………… 17 3. UAT ARC Assessment of Key Issues…………………………………………… 18 3.1. Summary of Key Issues Affecting Development & Transition to an Unleaded AVGAS…………………………………………………………….. 18 3.1.1. General Issues……………………………………………………… 18 3.1.2. Market & Economic Issues………………………………………… 18 3.1.3. Certification & Qualification Issues……………………………….. 18 3.1.4. Aircraft & Engine Technical Issues………………………………. 19 3.1.5. Production & Distribution Issues………………………………….. 19 3.1.6. Environment & Toxicology Issues………………………………… 19 3.2. General Issues – Will Not Be A Drop-In…………………………….……. 20 3.2.1. Drop-In vs. Transparent……………..……………………………. 20 3.2.2. Historic Efforts Focused on Drop-In…………………………….. 21 3.2.3. No Program to Support Development of AVGAS………………. 21 3.3. Market & Economic Issues…………………….. …………………………. 22 3.3.1. Market Forces……………………………………………………… 22 3.3.2. Aircraft Owner Market Perspective……………………………….. 23 3.3.3. Fleet Utilization …………..…………………………………………. 24 3.3.4. Design Approval Holder (DAH) Perspective ……………………. 25 3.4. Certification & Qualification Issues…………………………………………. 26 3.4.1. FAA Regulatory Structure…….……………………………………. 26 3.4.2. ASTM and FAA Data Requirements………………..……………. 27 3.4.3. FAA Certification Offices…………………………………………… 28 3.4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • General Aviation Aircraft Propulsion: Power and Energy Requirements
    UNCLASSIFIED General Aviation Aircraft Propulsion: Power and Energy Requirements • Tim Watkins • BEng MRAeS MSFTE • Instructor and Flight Test Engineer • QinetiQ – Empire Test Pilots’ School • Boscombe Down QINETIQ/EMEA/EO/CP191341 RAeS Light Aircraft Design Conference | 18 Nov 2019 | © QinetiQ UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Contents • Benefits of electrifying GA aircraft propulsion • A review of the underlying physics • GA Aircraft power requirements • A brief look at electrifying different GA aircraft types • Relationship between battery specific energy and range • Conclusions 2 RAeS Light Aircraft Design Conference | 18 Nov 2019 | © QinetiQ UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Benefits of electrifying GA aircraft propulsion • Environmental: – Greatly reduced aircraft emissions at the point of use – Reduced use of fossil fuels – Reduced noise • Cost: – Electric aircraft are forecast to be much cheaper to operate – Even with increased acquisition cost (due to batteries), whole-life cost will be reduced dramatically – Large reduction in light aircraft operating costs (e.g. for pilot training) – Potential to re-invigorate the GA sector • Opportunities: – Makes highly distributed propulsion possible – Makes hybrid propulsion possible – Key to new designs for emerging urban air mobility and eVTOL sectors 3 RAeS Light Aircraft Design Conference | 18 Nov 2019 | © QinetiQ UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Energy conversion efficiency Brushless electric motor and controller: • Conversion efficiency ~ 95% for motor, ~ 90% for controller • Variable pitch propeller efficiency
    [Show full text]
  • Dual-Mode Free-Jet Combustor
    Dual-Mode Free-Jet Combustor Charles J. Trefny and Vance F. Dippold III [email protected] NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, Ohio USA Shaye Yungster Ohio Aerospace Institute Cleveland, Ohio USA ABSTRACT The dual-mode free-jet combustor concept is described. It was introduced in 2010 as a wide operating-range propulsion device using a novel supersonic free-jet combustion process. The unique feature of the free-jet combustor is supersonic combustion in an unconfined free-jet that traverses a larger subsonic combustion chamber to a variable throat area nozzle. During this mode of operation, the propulsive stream is not in contact with the combustor walls and equilibrates to the combustion chamber pressure. To a first order, thermodynamic efficiency is similar to that of a traditional scramjet under the assumption of constant-pressure combustion. Qualitatively, a number of possible benefits to this approach are as follows. The need for fuel staging is eliminated since the cross-sectional area distribution required for supersonic combustion is accommodated aerodynamically without regard for wall pressure gradients and boundary-layer separation. The unconstrained nature of the free-jet allows for consideration of a detonative combustion process that is untenable in a walled combustor. Heat loads, especially localized effects of shock wave / boundary-layer interactions, are reduced making possible the use of hydrocarbon fuels to higher flight Mach numbers. The initial motivation for this scheme however, was that the combustion chamber could be used for robust, subsonic combustion at low flight Mach numbers. At the desired flight condition, transition to free-jet mode would be effected by increasing the nozzle throat area and inducing separation at the diffuser inlet.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Combustor-Noise Models – AIAA 2012-2087
    A Comparison of Combustor-Noise Models – AIAA 2012-2087 Lennart S. Hultgren, NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44135 Summary The present status of combustor-noise prediction in the NASA Aircraft Noise Prediction Program (ANOPP)1 for current- generation (N) turbofan engines is summarized. Several semi-empirical models for turbofan combustor noise are discussed, including best methods for near-term updates to ANOPP. An alternate turbine-transmission factor2 will appear as a user selectable option in the combustor-noise module GECOR in the next release. The three-spectrum model proposed by Stone et al.3 for GE turbofan-engine combustor noise is discussed and compared with ANOPP predictions for several relevant cases. Based on the results presented herein and in their report,3 it is recommended that the application of this fully empirical combustor-noise prediction method be limited to situations involving only General-Electric turbofan engines. Long-term needs and challenges for the N+1 through N+3 time frame are discussed. Because the impact of other propulsion-noise sources continues to be reduced due to turbofan design trends, advances in noise-mitigation techniques, and expected aircraft configuration changes, the relative importance of core noise is expected to greatly increase in the future. The noise-source structure in the combustor, including the indirect one, and the effects of the propagation path through the engine and exhaust nozzle need to be better understood. In particular, the acoustic consequences of the expected trends toward smaller, highly efficient gas- generator cores and low-emission fuel-flexible combustors need to be fully investigated since future designs are quite likely to fall outside of the parameter space of existing (semi-empirical) prediction tools.
    [Show full text]
  • Poppet Valve
    POPPET VALVE A poppet valve is a valve consisting of a hole, usually round or oval, and a tapered plug, usually a disk shape on the end of a shaft also called a valve stem. The shaft guides the plug portion by sliding through a valve guide. In most applications a pressure differential helps to seal the valve and in some applications also open it. Other types Presta and Schrader valves used on tires are examples of poppet valves. The Presta valve has no spring and relies on a pressure differential for opening and closing while being inflated. Uses Poppet valves are used in most piston engines to open and close the intake and exhaust ports. Poppet valves are also used in many industrial process from controlling the flow of rocket fuel to controlling the flow of milk[[1]]. The poppet valve was also used in a limited fashion in steam engines, particularly steam locomotives. Most steam locomotives used slide valves or piston valves, but these designs, although mechanically simpler and very rugged, were significantly less efficient than the poppet valve. A number of designs of locomotive poppet valve system were tried, the most popular being the Italian Caprotti valve gear[[2]], the British Caprotti valve gear[[3]] (an improvement of the Italian one), the German Lentz rotary-cam valve gear, and two American versions by Franklin, their oscillating-cam valve gear and rotary-cam valve gear. They were used with some success, but they were less ruggedly reliable than traditional valve gear and did not see widespread adoption. In internal combustion engine poppet valve The valve is usually a flat disk of metal with a long rod known as the valve stem out one end.
    [Show full text]
  • Ignition System on the ZX750E
    CD Ignition Interface for ZX750E1 Page 1 of 8 How to use an aftermarket CD (Capacitive Discharge) ignition system on the ZX750E. Art MacCarley Nipomo, California, USA February 2010. Background If you are only interested in the solution, not the background and explanation, please jump to the last section of this posting. While aftermarket electronic ignition systems and upgraded ignition coils are commonly used on the ZX750E, I could not find any case in which a Capacitive Discharge Ignition (CDI) system was used while retaining the stock ECU (Electronic Control Unit). With apologies to the experts on this forum that probably know everything I discuss below, this is for the benefit of those that, like myself, that had to figure it all out experimentally and come up with a solution. My personal motivation to use an ultimate ignition system was my conversion to methanol, which misfires and runs rough until fully warmed up. The higher energy output and multi-fire features of a CD system could possibly improve this. A typical inductive ignition system delivers about 100 mJ per spark, and electronic “points” and improved coils alone can only marginally improve upon this. A CD system can deliver theoretically much greater ignition energy, limited only by the size of the discharge capacitor, the charging voltage, and ultimately the internal breakdown voltage of the ignition coil. The output of the ARC-II is specified as 189mJ using a 500V charge voltage. My experience is based upon using the Dynatek Arc-II CD ignition system on my 1984 ZX-750E1. This CDI is advertised as having “the highest spark energy of any CDI on the market”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential of Turboprops to Reduce Fuel Consumption in the Chinese Aviation System
    THE POTENTIAL OF TURBOPROPS TO REDUCE FUEL CONSUMPTION IN THE CHINESE AVIATION SYSTEM Megan S. Ryerson, Xin Ge Department of City and Regional Planning Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering University of Pennsylvania [email protected] ICRAT 2014 Agenda • Introduction • Data collection • Turboprops in the current CAS network • Spatial trends for short-haul aviation • Regional jet and turboprop trade space • Turboprops in the future CAS network 2 1. Introduction – Growth of the Chinese Aviation System Number of Airports • The Chinese aviation system is in a period 300 of rapid growth • China’s civil aviation system grew at a rate 250 244 of 17.6%/year, 1980 - 2009 • Number of airports grew from 77 to 166 and annual traffic volume increasing from 3.43 million to 230 million 200 • The Civil Aviation Administration of China 166 (CAAC) maintains a target of 244 airports 150 across the country by 2020 • The CAAC plans for 80% of urban and suburban areas to be within a 100km (62 100 77 miles) of aviation service by 2020 • Plans also include strengthening hub-and- 50 spoke networks across the country to meet the dual goals of improving the competitiveness and efficiency of domestic 0 and international aviation. 1980 2009 2020 (Planned) 3 1. Introduction – Reform of the Chinese Aviation System • Consolidation Strong national hubs + insufficient regional coverage • Regional commuter airlines could fill this gap by partnering with China’s major carriers and serving the second-tier and emerging hubs (Shaw, 2009) 4 1. Introduction – Aircraft of the Short Haul Chinese Aviation System Narrow Body Jet Fuel per seat: 7.9 gal Regional Jet Fuel per seat: 19.0 gal Turboprop Fuel per seat: 4.35 gal 5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Fuel Efficiency Characteristics of Regional Aircraft from Technological, Operational, and Cost Perspectives
    The Historical Fuel Efficiency Characteristics of Regional Aircraft from Technological, Operational, and Cost Perspectives Raffi Babikian, Stephen P. Lukachko and Ian A. Waitz* Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139 ABSTRACT To develop approaches that effectively reduce aircraft emissions, it is necessary to understand the mechanisms that have enabled historical improvements in aircraft efficiency. This paper focuses on the impact of regional aircraft on the U.S. aviation system and examines the technological, operational and cost characteristics of turboprop and regional jet aircraft. Regional aircraft are 40% to 60% less fuel efficient than their larger narrow- and wide-body counterparts, while regional jets are 10% to 60% less fuel efficient than turboprops. Fuel efficiency differences can be explained largely by differences in aircraft operations, not technology. Direct operating costs per revenue passenger kilometer are 2.5 to 6 times higher for regional aircraft because they operate at lower load factors and perform fewer miles over which to spread fixed costs. Further, despite incurring higher fuel costs, regional jets are shown to have operating costs similar to turboprops when flown over comparable stage lengths. Keywords: Regional aircraft, environment, regional jet, turboprop 1. INTRODUCTION The rapid growth of worldwide air travel has prompted concern about the influence of aviation activities on the environment. Demand for air travel has grown at an average rate of 9.0% per year since 1960 and at approximately 4.5% per year over the last decade (IPCC, 1999; FAA, 2000a). Barring any serious economic downturn or significant policy changes, various * Contact author: 617-253-0218 (phone), 617-258-6093 (fax), [email protected] (email) 1 organizations have estimated future worldwide growth will average 5% annually through at least 2015 (IPCC, 1999; Boeing, 2000; Airbus, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Afterburners
    2. AFTERBURNERS 2.1 Introduction The simple gas turbine cycle can be designed to have good performance characteristics at a particular operating or design point. However, a particu­ lar engine does not have the capability of producing a good performance for large ranges of thrust, an inflexibility that can lead to problems when the flight program for a particular vehicle is considered. For example, many airplanes require a larger thrust during takeoff and acceleration than they do at a cruise condition. Thus, if the engine is sized for takeoff and has its design point at this condition, the engine will be too large at cruise. The vehicle performance will be penalized at cruise for the poor off-design point operation of the engine components and for the larger weight of the engine. Similar problems arise when supersonic cruise vehicles are considered. The afterburning gas turbine cycle was an early attempt to avoid some of these problems. Afterburners or augmentation devices were first added to aircraft gas turbine engines to increase their thrust during takeoff or brief periods of acceleration and supersonic flight. The devices make use of the fact that, in a gas turbine engine, the maximum gas temperature at the turbine inlet is limited by structural considerations to values less than half the adiabatic flame temperature at the stoichiometric fuel-air ratio. As a result, the gas leaving the turbine contains most of its original concentration of oxygen. This oxygen can be burned with additional fuel in a secondary combustion chamber located downstream of the turbine where temperature constraints are relaxed.
    [Show full text]
  • 550 Series Avgas Engine
    The 550 series includes 550 in3 models in either naturally aspirated or turbocharged configurations. With the right combination of thrust and efficiency, our 550-series engines are powering some of the most successful and high performing aircraft in general aviation history like the Cirrus® SR22T and Beechcraft® Baron/Bonanza, and Mooney®. With a powerful range of 280 to 350 HP at 2500 to 2700 RPM, you’ll be glad you fly a 550. THE 550 SERIES IS A FAMILY CERTIFIED FUELS: STROKE: TYPICAL WEIGHT: 100/100LL & 94UL 107.95 mm 207 to 317 kg OF AIR COOLED, NATURALLY AvGas (TSIO-550-K only) 4.25 in 456 to 699 lbs ASPIRATED, HORIZONTALLY DISPLACEMENT: COMPRESSION TIME BETWEEN OPPOSED, 6-CYLINDER, 9046 cm³ (COMP.) RATIO: OVERHAUL (TBO): 552 in3 7.5:1 1800 – 2200 hours GASOLINE, FUEL INJECTED, SPARK 8.5:1 IGNITION, FOUR-STROKE, DIRECT POWER: TURBO MODEL 209 to 261 kW HEIGHT: AVAILABILITY: DRIVE, RIGHT (CW) ROTATING, 280 to 350 HP 501.7 to 933.2 mm Yes AIRCRAFT ENGINE WITH MANUAL 19.75 to 36.74 in MAXIMUM ENGINE CONTROLS FOR FIXED RATED RPM: WIDTH: 2500 to 2700 r/min 852.4 to 1076.7 mm WING AIRCRAFT. THE TURBO 2500 to 2700 rpm 33.56 to 42.39 in SERIES IS TURBOCHARGED FOR BORE: LENGTH: FIXED WING AIRCRAFT. 133.35 mm 933.2 to 1215.6 mm 5.25 in 36.74 to 47.86 in WWW.CONTINENTAL.AERO # RATED DRY CERTIFIED COMP. TIME BETWEEN FAA MODEL 1 BORE × STROKE DISPLACEMENT 2 FUEL OVERHAUL CYL POWER WEIGHT GRADE RATIO (TBO) TCDS 224 kW @ 2700 133.35 x 107.95 mm 9046 cm³ 206.8 kg IO-550-A 6 100/ 100LL 8.5:1 1900 hours E3SO 300 HP @ 2700 5.25 x 4.25 in 552 in³ 455.9
    [Show full text]