I Think / Renée / Has Flown / the Coop. Iambic Tetrameter 1 2 3 4 Will You

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

I Think / Renée / Has Flown / the Coop. Iambic Tetrameter 1 2 3 4 Will You

ANSWER KEY PART 1: Metrical Feet and Metrical Lines Assume that each of the following is the first lineof a different poem written in iambic meter. For each line, 1) read the line aloud; 2) mark the iambs (u/); 3) use slashes to divide the line into metrical feet; 4) determine the name of the metrical line (e.g., iambic pentameter). Metrical Line? u / u / u / u / I think / Renée / has flown / the coop. iambic tetrameter 1 2 3 4 u / u / u / u / u / Will you / regret / not go / ing to / the sea? iambic pentameter 1 2 3 4 5 u / u / u / u / u / u / Behold / the gold / en cup / of pos / sibil / ity! iambic hexameter 1 2 3 4 5 6 Now do the same for this verse from Joyce Sidman’s poem “Porcupette.” Read the rest of the poem here. u / u / u / u / Metrical Line? I am / a ba / by por / cupette. iambic tetrameter u / u / u / u / My paws / are small, / my nose / is wet. u / u / u / u / And as / I nurse / against / my mom, u / u / u / u / we mew / and coo / a soft / duet. Excerpt from “Porcupette” by Joyce Sidman. © 2010 Joyce Sidman from the book DARK EMPEROR AND OTHER POEMS OF THE NIGHT (Houghton Mifflin Books for Children). PART 2: Writing It’s your turn! Write a quatrain (a four-line stanza) in iambic meter. Today’s poetry topic is BALLOONS. Use the examples here and in the lesson as models for your work. The number of metrical feet is up to you. Of course, feel free to write more than one quatrain if you like! Please share your quatrain in the class Facebook group, or stop by to ask questions and get feedback. Here’s my quatrain to share: Balloons escape above my head— (Lines 1 and 3: iambic tetrameter) I stretch for dangling strings. (Lines 2 and 4: iambic trimeter) I’d rather fly with my balloons on graceful, stringless wings. This lesson is part of the online writing course THE LYRICAL LANGUAGE LAB and is copyrighted intellectual property. Samples and excerpts used in the course are the sole property of and copyrighted by the credited authors. Copyright © 2014 Renée M. LaTulippe. All rights reserved. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Introduction to Meter
Introduction to Meter A stress or accent is the greater amount of force given to one syllable than another. English is a language in which all syllables are stressed or unstressed, and traditional poetry in English has used stress patterns as a fundamental structuring device. Meter is simply the rhythmic pattern of stresses in verse. To scan a poem means to read it for meter, an operation whose noun form is scansion. This can be tricky, for although we register and reproduce stresses in our everyday language, we are usually not aware of what we’re going. Learning to scan means making a more or less unconscious operation conscious. There are four types of meter in English: iambic, trochaic, anapestic, and dactylic. Each is named for a basic foot (usually two or three syllables with one strong stress). Iambs are feet with an unstressed syllable, followed by a stressed syllable. Only in nursery rhymes to do we tend to find totally regular meter, which has a singsong effect, Chidiock Tichborne’s poem being a notable exception. Here is a single line from Emily Dickinson that is totally regular iambic: _ / │ _ / │ _ / │ _ / My life had stood – a loaded Gun – This line serves to notify readers that the basic form of the poem will be iambic tetrameter, or four feet of iambs. The lines that follow are not so regular. Trochees are feet with a stressed syllable, followed by an unstressed syllable. Trochaic meter is associated with chants and magic spells in English: / _ │ / _ │ / _ │ / _ Double, double, toil and trouble, / _ │ / _ │ / _ │ / _ Fire burn and cauldron bubble.
[Show full text]
Lerud Dissertation May 2017
ANTAGONISTIC COOPERATION: PROSE IN AMERICAN POETRY by ELIZABETH J. LERUD A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of English and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2017 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Elizabeth J. LeRud Title: Antagonistic Cooperation: Prose in American Poetry This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the English Department by: Karen J. Ford Chair Forest Pyle Core Member William Rossi Core Member Geri Doran Institutional Representative and Scott L. Pratt Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2017. ii © 2017 Elizabeth J. LeRud iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Elizabeth J. LeRud Doctor of Philosophy Department of English June 2017 Title: Antagonistic Cooperation: Prose in American Poetry Poets and critics have long agreed that any perceived differences between poetry and prose are not essential to those modes: both are comprised of words, both may be arranged typographically in various ways—in lines, in paragraphs of sentences, or otherwise—and both draw freely from the complete range of literary styles and tools, like rhythm, sound patterning, focalization, figures, imagery, narration, or address. Yet still, in modern American literature, poetry and prose remain entrenched as a binary, one just as likely to be invoked as fact by writers and scholars as by casual readers. I argue that this binary is not only prevalent but also productive for modern notions of poetry, the root of many formal innovations of the past two centuries, like the prose poem and free verse.
[Show full text]
Rhythm and Meter in Macbeth Iambic Pentameter (Nobles)
Grade 9 Analysis- Rhythm and Meter in Macbeth Iambic Pentameter (Nobles) What is it? Shakespeare's sonnets are written predominantly in a meter called iambic pentameter, a rhyme scheme in which each sonnet line consists of ten syllables. The syllables are divided into five pairs called iambs or iambic feet. An iamb is a metrical unit made up of one unstressed syllable followed by one stressed syllable. An example of an iamb would be good BYE. A line of iambic pentameter flows like this: baBOOM / baBOOM / baBOOM / baBOOM / baBOOM. Why does Shakespeare use it? When Shakespeare's characters speak in verse (iambic pentameter), they are usually the noble (aristocratic) characters, and their speech represents their high culture and position in society. It gives the play a structured consistency, and when this is changed in instances of prose such as when Macbeth writes to Lady Macbeth and when Lady Macduff talks with her son, these are normally instances where a situation is abnormal e.g. when the Porter babbles in his drunken haze. Trochaic Tetrameter (Witches) What is it? Trochaic tetrameter is a rapid meter of poetry consisting of four feet of trochees. A trochee is made up of one stressed syllable followed by one unstressed syllable (the opposite of an iamb). Here is the flow of a line of trochaic tetrameter: BAboom / BAboom / BAboom / BAboom. Why does Shakespeare use it? The witches’ speech patterns create a spooky mood from the start of the scene. Beginning with the second line, they speak in rhyming couplets of trochaic tetrameter. The falling rhythm and insistent rhyme emphasize the witchcraft they practice while they speak—boiling some sort of potion in a cauldron.
[Show full text]
Universidade De São Paulo Faculdade De Filosofia, Letras E
Universidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas Departamento de Línguas Clássicas e Vernáculas Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras Clássicas Alexandre Pinheiro Hasegawa Dispositio e distinção de gêneros nos Epodos de Horácio: estudo acompanhado de tradução em verso SÃO PAULO 2010 ii Universidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas Departamento de Línguas Clássicas e Vernáculas Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras Clássicas Alexandre Pinheiro Hasegawa Dispositio e distinção de gêneros nos Epodos de Horácio: estudo acompanhado de tradução em verso Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós- Graduação em Letras Clássicas do Departamento de Letras Clássicas e Vernáculas da Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas de Universidade de São Paulo para obtenção do título de Doutor. Orientador: Prof. Dr. João Angelo Oliva Neto Co-orientador: Prof. Dr. Andrea Cucchiarelli SÃO PAULO 2010 iii A Laura, meae lauro , e Letícia, laetae segeti iv AGRADECIMENTOS Agradeço ao Prof. Dr. João Angelo Oliva Neto pela orientação e pela amizade e ao Prof. Dr. Andrea Cucchiarelli pela co-orientação e gentil acolhimento durante o estágio no exterior, ambos nel mezzo del cammin della mia vita foram fundamentais para que o trabalho fosse conduzido por diritta via . Agradeço à CAPES, meo Maecenati , pela bolsa concedida que possibilitou não só discutir a tese com pesquisadores estrangeiros, mas também recolher material indisponível em nossas bibliotecas. Agradeço à Prof. Paula da Cunha Corrêa e ao Prof. Dr. Brunno Vinicius Gonçalves Vieira que me argüiram no exame de qualificação, trazendo importantes contribuições para o desenvolvimento da tese. Agradeço a todos colegas da área que sempre me apoiaram, sobretudo ao Prof.
[Show full text]
The Poetry Handbook I Read / That John Donne Must Be Taken at Speed : / Which Is All Very Well / Were It Not for the Smell / of His Feet Catechising His Creed.)
Introduction his book is for anyone who wants to read poetry with a better understanding of its craft and technique ; it is also a textbook T and crib for school and undergraduate students facing exams in practical criticism. Teaching the practical criticism of poetry at several universities, and talking to students about their previous teaching, has made me sharply aware of how little consensus there is about the subject. Some teachers do not distinguish practical critic- ism from critical theory, or regard it as a critical theory, to be taught alongside psychoanalytical, feminist, Marxist, and structuralist theor- ies ; others seem to do very little except invite discussion of ‘how it feels’ to read poem x. And as practical criticism (though not always called that) remains compulsory in most English Literature course- work and exams, at school and university, this is an unwelcome state of affairs. For students there are many consequences. Teachers at school and university may contradict one another, and too rarely put the problem of differing viewpoints and frameworks for analysis in perspective ; important aspects of the subject are omitted in the confusion, leaving otherwise more than competent students with little or no idea of what they are being asked to do. How can this be remedied without losing the richness and diversity of thought which, at its best, practical criticism can foster ? What are the basics ? How may they best be taught ? My own answer is that the basics are an understanding of and ability to judge the elements of a poet’s craft. Profoundly different as they are, Chaucer, Shakespeare, Pope, Dickinson, Eliot, Walcott, and Plath could readily converse about the techniques of which they are common masters ; few undergraduates I have encountered know much about metre beyond the terms ‘blank verse’ and ‘iambic pentameter’, much about form beyond ‘couplet’ and ‘sonnet’, or anything about rhyme more complicated than an assertion that two words do or don’t.
[Show full text]
Iambic Pentameter
Check for Understanding – Finding Meter in Poetry Help: • Iambic Pentameter – 5 iambs in a line • Anapest – Two unstressed syllables followed by a stressed beat • Anapestic Tetrameter – 4 anapests per line • Anapestic Pentameter – 5 anapests per line 1. Which of these lines is in iambic pentameter? a. But soft! What light through yonder window breaks?/ It is the East, and Juliet is the sun. b. Arise fair sun and kill the envious moon. / Who is already sick and pale with grief. c. And today the Great Yertle. / That marvelous he / is king of the mud d. She walks in beauty, like the night / of cloudless climes and starry skies e. Both a and b 2. Which of these lines is NOT iambic pentameter? a. And I do love thee: therefore, go with me. b. And none but fools do wear it; cast it off. c. Now is the winter of our discontent. d. I was alone for years on end. 3. Which of these is an anapest? a. Understand b. Unrest c. Forget d. Curious 4. Which of these lines is in anapestic tetrameter? a. And today that Great Yertle, / That marvelous he/ is king of the mud/ that is all he can see. b. She sits and glances out the window gray/ the glass just mocks and fogs her weary eyes c. Thy scarlet rise, thy wistful blur/ I delve into thine purest passion d. There is a place of solace / a meadow near a mill / where cranes come to gather KEY Help: • Iambic Pentameter – 5 iambs in a line • Anapest – Two unstressed syllables followed by a stressed beat • Anapestic Tetrameter – 4 anapests per line • Anapestic Pentameter – 5 anapests per line 1.
[Show full text]
Basic Guide to Latin Meter and Scansion
APPENDIX B Basic Guide to Latin Meter and Scansion Latin poetry follows a strict rhythm based on the quantity of the vowel in each syllable. Each line of poetry divides into a number of feet (analogous to the measures in music). The syllables in each foot scan as “long” or “short” according to the parameters of the meter that the poet employs. A vowel scans as “long” if (1) it is long by nature (e.g., the ablative singular ending in the first declen- sion: puellā); (2) it is a diphthong: ae (saepe), au (laudat), ei (deinde), eu (neuter), oe (poena), ui (cui); (3) it is long by position—these vowels are followed by double consonants (cantātae) or a consonantal i (Trōia), x (flexibus), or z. All other vowels scan as “short.” A few other matters often confuse beginners: (1) qu and gu count as single consonants (sīc aquilam; linguā); (2) h does NOT affect the quantity of a vowel Bellus( homō: Martial 1.9.1, the -us in bellus scans as short); (3) if a mute consonant (b, c, d, g, k, q, p, t) is followed by l or r, the preced- ing vowel scans according to the demands of the meter, either long (omnium patrōnus: Catullus 49.7, the -a in patrōnus scans as long to accommodate the hendecasyllabic meter) OR short (prō patriā: Horace, Carmina 3.2.13, the first -a in patriā scans as short to accommodate the Alcaic strophe). 583 40-Irby-Appendix B.indd 583 02/07/15 12:32 AM DESIGN SERVICES OF # 157612 Cust: OUP Au: Irby Pg.
[Show full text]
Shakespeare the Poet
Shakespeare the Poet Exploring the poetic style of William Shakespeare Iambic Pentameter ● Like many of Shakespeare’s plays, Romeo and Juliet is written in a poetic structure known as iambic pentameter. ● This is a rhythmical pattern of syllables. ● “iambic’ means that the rhythm goes from an unstressed syllable to a stressed one. ● Examples: divine, caress, bizarre, delight ● Sounds like a heartbeat: daDUM, daDUM, daDUM Iambic Pentameter (cont.) ● Each iambic part (unstressed and stressed syllable used together) is called a “foot” ● “pentameter” means that the line has 5 of these “feet” ● The word “divine” is a foot, the phrase “hate thee” is also a foot. ● Remember, we are talking about syllables here, not words. ● If there is an extra syllable in the line, this is called catalexis. Just make the next syllable unstressed. Examples of Iambic Pentameter ● I walked, she fled, and day brought back my night -John Milton ● I walked/she fled/and day/brought back/my night More Examples ● We hold these truths to be self-evident -Thomas Jefferson ● We hold/ these truths/ to be/ self e/ vi dent Romeo and Juliet Example ● As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee ● As I/ hate hell/ all Mon/ ta gues/ and thee Now you try it on your own! ● What art thou drawn among these heartless hinds. ● But soft! What light through wonder window breaks? Sonnet ● A sonnet is a poem that consists of 14 lines of iambic pentameter. ● How many feet would that be? ● You got it…70 feet ● There are a few different types of rhyming schemes, but the English or Shakespearean Sonnet follows this format: ● abab cdcd efef gg Shakespearean Sonnets ● The Prologues to Act I and Act II are sonnets.
[Show full text]
Notes on Prosody
Notes on Middle English Prosody Dr. A Mitchell Sound and Sense Middle English poets typically delight in the accidental harmonies and disharmonies of verbal sounds. Sometimes sound is deliberately made to echoe sense, but more often accoustic patterns do not serve a referential or mimetic function. Syncopated rhythm may just be pleasurable to hear in the voice; variation may aid expressiveness or enhance interest; or sounds may be affective or mnemonic. Sound patterns also function as a sign of the poet’s pedigree, affiliations, or tastes. But in any event critics can probably make only modest claims about the significance of acoustic effects in the vernacular – some measure of irregularity is just a natural consequence of writing in Middle English. Rhyme is the most familiar sound pattern, and it basically demands that the poetic composition be oriented around the music (not the other way around). As a result, the semantic may be subordinated to the sonic or phonetic: e.g., syntax is inverted or contorted so as to get the proper rhyme in place; rhyme words are chosen less for sense than for sound. But of course rhymes may also produce interesting semantic juxtapositions or recapitulations, and occasionally Chaucer among others uses rhyme deftly to produce harmony and discordance, parallelism and antithesis. The main types of rhyme are the following. • end rhyme (most common) • internal rhyme (within a line) • masculine (single-sllable, or when final stressed syllable rhymes as in cat/hat) • feminine (rhymed stressed syllable followed by unstressed as in butter/clutter) • exact rhyme and rime riche (on the same sounds) • near rhyme (not a failed rhyme, it has the salutary effect of avoiding monotony) You will recognize these additional sound effects: • onomatapoia • assonance • alliteration • consonance Metrics: Alliterative and Accentual-Syllabic Some Medieval English verse is alliterative (that of Langland and the so-called poems of the Alliterative Revival), but much is what we call accentual-syllabic.
[Show full text]
Trochees and Iambs2
CHAPTER III. Some Remarks on the Nature of Trochees and Iambs and their Relationship to Other Metres ‘The iambic is the characteristic rhythm of people as they talk […]. The trochaic rhythm, again, is too much akin to the comic dance, as may be seen in tetrameter verse, for the rhythm of tetrameters is light and tripping. (Aristotle, 1932: 3.8, 1408b). The present study assumes that poetic rhythm in the tonic-syllabic system current in English poetry can be best accounted for by three sets of patterns: First, an abstract matrix of expectations consisting of regularly alternating strong and weak positions. Secondly, the stress-pattern of spoken language. Some aspects of this stress pattern confirm the abstract schema (one could even say that it is from these that the reader abstracts the metric pattern); some aspects deviate from it, and produce tension. These deviations, far from being signs of imperfection, of “unmetricality”, are major prosodic and expressive assets. When the reader encounters some deviation from the abstract metric pattern, he makes adjustments in its performance, so as to preserve both his metrical set, that is, his feeling of regularly alternating strong and weak positions and, at the same time, the stress pattern of his spoken language. The adjustment frequently consists in overarticu- lation, overstressing, and additional grouping of stresses. This constitutes the third pattern, the pattern of performance. The greater the deviation, the greater the adjustment required and the tighter the additional grouping, One of the basic assumptions of the present study is, then, that the rhythm of a poem is accessible only through some kind of performance; an adequate account of a poem’s rhythm can be given only by considering the interplay of three patterns: those of metre, stresses and performance.
[Show full text]
Schiller's Jungfrau, Euripides's Iphigenia Plays, and Joan of Arc on the Stage
City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2015 Sisters in Sublime Sanctity: Schiller's Jungfrau, Euripides's Iphigenia Plays, and Joan of Arc on the Stage John Martin Pendergast Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1090 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] SISTERS IN SUBLIME SANCTITY: Schiller’s Jungfrau, Euripides’s Iphigenia Plays, and Joan of Arc on the Stage by John Pendergast A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Comparative Literature in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The City University of New York 2015 ii © 2015 JOHN PENDERGAST All Rights Reserved iii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Comparative Literature to satisfy the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 21 May 2015 Dr. Paul Oppenheimer________________________ Date Chair of the Examining Committee 21 May 2015______________ Dr. Giancarlo Lombardi ______________________ Date Executive Officer Dr. Paul Oppenheimer Dr. Elizabeth Beaujour Dr. André Aciman Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iv Abstract Sisters in Sublime Sanctity: Schiller’s Jungfrau, Euripides’s Iphigenia Plays, and Joan of Arc on the Stage by John Pendergast Adviser: Professor Paul Oppenheimer At the dawn of the nineteenth century, Friedrich Schiller reinvented the image of Joan of Arc in his play, Die Jungfrau von Orleans, with consequences that affected theatrical representations of Joan for the rest of that century and well into the twentieth.
[Show full text]
Thoreau's Unchained Prosody Noel Sherrard Thoreau's Poetry Is Littered
Thoreau’s Unchained Prosody Noel Sherrard Thoreau’s poetry is littered with moments of ambiguous meter. However, these moments are not examples of Thoreau’s last usage of meter, if such a thing exists. Rather, they are calculated bits of uncertainty, which reflect, inform and complicate the content of his lines. In the mid 19th century, Thoreau was well on the path toward the irregular and metrically indeterminate meter that would become popular in the 20th century. In Thoreau’s poem “Conscience,” ambiguous meter functions to undermine the speaker’s attempt to attain a more pious, simple life. As defined by the OED, “conscience” is “the inner sense of what is right or wrong in one's conduct or motives, impelling one toward right action.” Throughout the poem, the speaker struggles toward what he perceives as God’s mandate for simplicity. However, his own internal compass of right action, his conscience, is at odds with this divine mandate, and incorrigibly leads him astray. “I love a life whose plot is simple,” he says, rather coyly (6). The poem that follows, however, is riddled by very un-simple lines and meter, presenting his quest for simplicity as vain and hopeless. In fact, lines that uphold the poem’s (barely) prevailing meter of iambic tetrameter are few and far between. Because these iambic-tetrameter lines are relatively few, and because they offer antithesis to the chaos of the rest of the lines, they mark moments of clarity for the speaker and merit discussion. By reveling in metrical complexity and discord, Thoreau mocks the prevailing wisdom that “Tis a joy to be simple,” to quote the old hymn, as well the notion that perfect meter is a goal for which to strive.
[Show full text]