DOCSLIB.ORG

Reification and the Ontology of Human Dignity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reification and the Ontology of Human Dignity Journal of Philosophy and Ethics Volume 1, Issue 3, 2019, PP 14-21 ISSN 2642-8415 Reification and the Ontology of Human Dignity Dr. Ozoigbo Bonaventure Ikechukwu1*, Dr. Onuoha Jude2 1,2Directorate of General Studies, Federal University of Technology, Owerri-Nigeria *Corresponding Author: Ozoigbo Bonaventure Ikechukwu, Directorate of General Studies, Federal University of Technology, Owerri-Nigeria, Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The continuous inhuman treatment of man by man necessitated this article. Reification of man by man is the worst treatment man can receive and we see this happening on daily basis globally. We refer to commodification of human beings in Libya, Kidnapping for monetary ransom in Nigeria, mass shooting in the United States for varied reasons, underpayment of workers in some Western countries as a result of non- documentation of immigrants, casualization of workers in some African countries, etc. Reification features also in the manner man pays more attention to the products of technology than to himself and other human beings. This paper calls for the restoration of and respect for human dignity as this is natural to man. Man cannot be alienated from this dignity no matter the reason – human or divine. Keywords: Reification, Heidegger, Marx, Lukacs, Honneth, Human Dignity, Thingnification, Thomistic. INTRODUCTION context, ‗is used to characterize the totality of social relations‘ (Lotz. 2013, 185). However, the The concept of reification often appears in task of this paper is not to continue in the socio-political discourses, and the analysis that Marxian pattern of examining how human social and critical theorists often make about beings relate with themselves vis-à-vis of their reification in relation to economic alienation or labours, but rather to take a completely different objectification. The idea of alienation or perspective to evaluating the notion of objectification is well-known, at least for those reification within the context of the ontology of familiar with the socio-political philosophy of human dignity. Karl Marx and Georg Lukacs. The notion of reification also appears in Heidegger‘s theory of By ontology of human dignity, we are looking at technology, where the concept is explored in dignity in relation to human nature and relations to the thingification of Dasein. There is humanity. Drawing from Jeff Malpas-Kantian a sense in which the view of reification in the description of dignity, we view dignity as a Heideggerian sense is linked to the Marxian notion that is inseparable from the ontological understanding of the concept (Lotz, 2013, 187). question of the nature of humanness, that is, In sum, every analysis of reification is often what makes an individual a human being – ―to discussed in relations to a generalized form of attend to human dignity is to attend to the value socio-economic interaction, where human or significance that belongs to human being‖ beings now reduce themselves to objects of their (Malpas 2007, 19). Talking about dignity implies labour or things, such that they now see their talking about our human nature. This is quite social interaction as the interaction of things. In different from the idea of dignity ―associated order words, within the context of social with aristocracy and social hierarchy, ―dignified behavior‖ being an index of the conscious self- interactions, human beings allow themselves to possession and social elevation of an individual‖ be controlled by the objects of their labour (Riley 2010, 143). In this paper, we attempt to rather than they being in control. show that degradation or dehumanizing actions, It is indisputable that the idea of reification as like the Nazi holocaust or the sales of migrants explored in the Marxian political economy is an in Libyaor the kidnapping of people and demand attempt to examine real human conditions that for ransom before their release as happening arise as a result of the interaction of commodities currently in Nigeria, which are part of violation within social relations. It won‘t be out of place of human dignity, mass shooting in the United to argue that reification, within the Marxian States of America for flimsy reasons, underpayment Journal of Philosophy and Ethics V1 ● 13 ● 2019 14 Reification and the Ontology of Human Dignity of workers in some Western countries for being exchange, rather, it is a form of thought that illegal migrants and casualization of workers in objectively exists in the form of the commodity some African countries, are all forms of (2002, 145). This is, thus, a kind of thought reification. The idea of reification, as used in abstracted from economic exchange as depicted this paper, thus, suggests – (1) the by a bourgeois economy (Marx 1887, 49). In the instrumentalization of humans as objects of use; Capitalist system, thus, the value that is derived (2) an ontological disconnection of human from all socio-economic interactions, are universal, beings from inter subjective nexus of humanity. social, practical and pure, but such value only appears as the existential properties of objects of In other to set up this argument in a more labour, or of things, which now define social profound way, we will first, briefly, explore the relations – relations of things. Marx calls this notion of reification. This would give us an thingification of social relations as a kind of insight to the concept of reification, at least, for fetishism of commodity, technically referred to historical convenience. We will examine the as reification. To be reified, in Marx‘s view, is Marxian, Heidegerian, Lukacsian, and Honnethian to be reduced to a ‗thing‘. A more extended accounts. Each of these accounts would interpretation of this Marxian view of reification illuminate our account of reification, especially, is to express it as an act in which ―…agents split Honneth‘s theory of recognition. It is pertinent off a part of their agency and convert it into a to note that each of these accounts seem to agree process with an independent dynamic…‖ that reification is a negatively construed concept, (Sensat 1997, 368) This reified process flows in and it relates to how human beings treat themselves such a way that it engulfs the agent. and others. But our account will look at a more ontological impact of dehumanization and Georg Lukacs explores the idea of reification in degradation through the act of reification. To relation to social interaction from a more essentialist start, we will explore Marx and Lukacs‘ economic perspective. Marx views the commodification of theory of reification. human interaction as a kind of social interaction of things, Lukacs, however, believes that this ECONOMIC APPROACH TO REIFICATION: thingification of social interaction is not just KARL MARX AND GEORG LUKACS limited to the commodity and the thingified or The concept of reification has emerged mostly reified object, but rather, it also permeates every from social philosophical writings and underlies facets of the society, and it is also reflected in most critical social discourses, especially, those ‗every expression of life‘. Reification is not just drawn from the Marxian philosophical orientation. a quantitative reduction on the value of human In the Marxian philosophical discourse, the beings as a result of interaction of their labour as notion of reification is employed in relation to Marx has suggested. Every objective and the idea of fetishism of commodity. The idea of subjective facets of the society, in so far as they Fetishism of commodity stems from the Marxian exist in a capitalist system, are objectified or claim that human beings seem to attach reified in a qualitative way (1971, 84). themselves to the products of their labour, such Capitalism, according to Lukacs, thus, is that they are from the commodities they have perceived as a totality of existential expression produced (1887, 48). In other words, human with a reified essence. In the bourgeois social interaction, which occurs as a result of economy, as Lukacs avers, ―reification functions economic transaction, is now perceived as a as a "universal structuring principle" which systemic interconnectedness of things (Berger "penetrates society in all its aspects," including and Pullberg1965, 199). This ontological mental human subjectivity itself‖ (Burris 1988, 12). alteration of human social consciousness results Lukacs further notes that since reification takes in reification because rather than seeing the essence of the capitalist system, commodity, themselves as human beings, whose labours are therefore, is very crucial in the subjugation of the realization of their rational faculty, they human consciousness. It is through this rather perceive themselves as objects of labour. subjugation that reification expresses itself, in Reification, in the Marxian sense, is the definitive which human beings allow themselves to be characterization of a capitalist system, and it is enslaved by the products of their labour (1971, the objective form of thought that drive the 86), but through false consciousness, they bourgeois economy. Helmut Reichelt explains believe that they are in control of the outcome of that ‗the objective form of thought‘ is not an their social relations. The tendency of the inter subjective form of thought that arises as a bourgeois economy is to continuously reproduce result of transactional interaction or commodity itself, and the more this economic reproduction 15 Journal of Philosophy and Ethics V1 ● 13 ● 2019 Reification and the Ontology of Human Dignity persists, the more ―…the structure of reification semantic role that permeates this masterpiece. progressively sinks … deeply, more fatefully Heidegger‘s central project in the … Being and and more definitively into the consciousness of Time is to set out in positive terms a view of man‖ (1971, 93). In Lukacs‘ account, Capitalism ourselves qua minded beings that avoid a creates a sense of false consciousness, whereby, reification of the one orthe other sort…‖(Esfeld our perception of ourselves and our surroundings 2001, 48-9).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Volume 33, Numbers 1-2, Fall 2019-Spring 2020 • Realism Published Twice Yearly, Mediations Is the Journal of the Marxist Literary Group
    Volume 33, Numbers 1-2, Fall 2019-Spring 2020 • Realism Published twice yearly, Mediations is the journal of the Marxist Literary Group. We publish dossiers of translated material on special topics and peer-reviewed general issues, usually in alternation. General inquiries and submissions should be directed to [email protected]. We invite scholarly contributions across disciplines on any topic that engages seriously with the Marxist tradition. Manuscripts received will be taken to be original, unpublished work not under consideration elsewhere. Articles should be submitted electronically in a widely-used format. Manuscripts should not exceed reasonable article length, and should be accompanied by an abstract of up to 300 words, including six keywords. Articles will be published in MLA endnote format, and should be submitted with the author’s name and affiliation on a separate cover page to facilitate blind peer review. Photographs, tables, and figures should be sent as separate files in a widely- used format. Written permission to reproduce copyright-protected material must be obtained by the author before submission. Books for review should be sent to: Mediations Department of English (MC 162) 601 South Morgan Street University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago IL 60607-7120 USA Articles published in Mediations may be reproduced for scholarly purposes without express permission, provided the reproduction is accompanied by full citation information. For archives and further information, visit http://www.mediationsjournal.org Cover
    [Show full text]
  • Hegemony and Democracy in Gramsci's Prison Notebooks
    Hegemony and Democracy in Gramsci’s Prison Notebooks Dylan Riley Antonio Gramsci is once again moving to the center of debates in contemporary social theory. Sociologists have taken up the concepts of hegemony and civil society to analyze regimes and social movements (Riley 2010; Tugal 2009). Political theorists have used Gramsci as an inspiration for developing the idea of radical democracy (Laclau and Mouffe 1985). Scholars of international relations have found Gramsci’s focus on global processes useful for analyzing neo-liberalism (Morton 2004, 125-127). Gramsci’s work has also been central in the attempt to elaborate a “sociological Marxism” that moves beyond both the statist and economistic biases of more traditional forms of Second and Third International historical materialism (Burawoy 2003; Wright 2010). But despite this outpouring of recent interest, many of the key elements of Gramsci’s political theory remain obscure. In this context, this essay returns to the Prison Notebooks1 to ask a specific question: “How did Gramsci conceive of the connection between democracy and hegemony?” This question has already generated a substantial body of scholarship. But most of it can be placed into one of two positions. One interpretation views hegemony as a theory of revolutionary dictatorship: a “Leninism” for the West (Galli della Loggia 1977, 69; Salvadori 1977, 40-41). These writers tend to be highly critical of the various attempts by the Partito Comunista Italiano (Italian Communist Party, PCI) to use Gramsci as a symbolic justification
    [Show full text]
  • Reification in the Modern World
    University of Mary Washington Eagle Scholar Student Research Submissions Spring 5-3-2020 Reification in the Modern orldW Tommy F. White Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.umw.edu/student_research Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation White, Tommy F., "Reification in the Modern orld"W (2020). Student Research Submissions. 337. https://scholar.umw.edu/student_research/337 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by Eagle Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Research Submissions by an authorized administrator of Eagle Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. White 1 Reification in the Modern World Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in Philosophy University of Mary Washington Fredericksburg, Virginia Tommy F. White Philosophy 485 4/26/2020 Supervised by Professor Craig Vasey White 2 REIFICATION IN THE MODERN WORLD TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction: 3 II. Reification: 8 III. Heidegger and Lukács: 18 IV. Marcuse and Leisure Time: 26 V. Conclusion: 31 Special Thanks to Dr. Craig Vasey, Dr. Michael Reno, Dr. Jason Hayob-Matzke, and Dr. David Ambuel for all the help and discussions over the last four years. White 3 I. In this paper, I will discuss a couple of ways that our experiences as individuals are affected by the capitalist structures of the society we live in. Mainly, I will focus on the process of reification, and whether it can help us understand society. There is reason to believe that by living in the late-capitalist society that is the United States, we are expediting our process of dying.
    [Show full text]
  • Georg' Lukacs, “Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat”
    Georg Lukacs History & Class Consciousness Written: 1923; Source: History & Class Consciousness; Publisher: Merlin Press, 1967; Transcribed: Andy Blunden; HTML Markup: Andy Blunden. Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat To be radical is to go to the root of the matter. For man, however, the root is man himself. Marx: Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. It is no accident that Marx should have begun with an analysis of commodities when, in the two great works of his mature period, he set out to portray capitalist society in its totality and to lay bare its fundamental nature. For at this stage in the history of mankind there is no problem that does not ultimately lead back to that question and there is no solution that could not be found in the solution to the riddle of commodity-structure. Of course the problem can only be discussed with this degree of generality if it achieves the depth and breadth to be found in Marx’s own analyses. That is to say, the problem of commodities must not be considered in isolation or even regarded as the central problem in economics, but as the central, structural problem of capitalist society in all its aspects. Only in this case can the structure of commodity-relations be made to yield a model of all the objective forms of bourgeois society together with all the subjective forms corresponding to them. I: The Phenomenon of Reification 1 The essence of commodity-structure has often been pointed out. Its basis is that a relation be- tween people takes on the character of a thing and thus acquires a ‘phantom objectivity’, an autonomy that seems so strictly rational and all-embracing as to conceal every trace of its fun- damental nature: the relation between people.
    [Show full text]
  • Queer Marx John Andrews CUNY Graduate Center
    Criticism Volume 52 Issue 2 Honoring Eve: A Special Issue on the Work of Article 22 Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick 2010 Queer Marx John Andrews CUNY Graduate Center Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/criticism Recommended Citation Andrews, John (2010) "Queer Marx," Criticism: Vol. 52: Iss. 2, Article 22. Available at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/criticism/vol52/iss2/22 QUeer Marx In the introduction to his collection of essays For Marx (1965), Louis John andrews althusser tells us that one of Marx- ian philosophy’s unique assets—and one of its ongoing challenges—is The Reification of Desire: Toward its ability to account for itself, “to a Queer Marxism by Kevin Floyd. take itself as its own object.”1 Cer- Minneapolis: University of Minne- tainly, Marxism’s historical reflex- sota Press, 2009. Pp. 304, 4 black- ivity has propelled its enduring and-white photos. $75.00 cloth, power to describe and explain the $25.00 paper. fallouts and reinventions of capi- talism. Yet this power has in recent decades been eclipsed by critiques of its tendency to reduce all of social relations to relations of economic production, relegating particularities such as race or sex “in the final instance” (asa lthusser might say) to class. One of the most trenchant of these critiques has come from queer theory, a field whose own critical efficacy has also been called into question in recent years. The wholesale “queering” of any fixed epistemological category alongside the “homonormaliza- tion” of LGBT politics prompted the editors of a special volume of Social Text to ask “What’s Queer about Queer Studies Now?”2 The issue of Marxism’s and queer theo- ry’s ongoing critical power—and their seeming incommensurabil- ity—sets the backdrop for Kevin Floyd’s ambitious and careful book The Reification of Desire.
    [Show full text]
  • Hegemony and Democracy in Gramsci's Prison Notebooks
    Peer Reviewed Title: Hegemony, Democracy, and Passive Revolution in Gramsci's Prison Notebooks Journal Issue: California Italian Studies, 2(2) Author: Riley, Dylan J., University of California - Berkeley Publication Date: 2011 Publication Info: California Italian Studies, Italian Studies Multicampus Research Group, UC Office of the President Permalink: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/5x48f0mz Author Bio: Dylan J. Riley is Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of California, Berkeley. His work uses comparative and historical methods to challenge a set of key conceptual oppositions in classical sociological theory: authoritarianism and democracy, revolution and counter-revolution, and state and society. His first monograph The Civic Foundations of Fascism in Europe: Italy, Spain, and Romania 1870-1945 was published in 2010 by Johns Hopkins University Press. His current book project is entitled Knowledge Production or Construction?: A Comparative Analysis of Census Taking in the West (with Rebecca Jean Emigh and Patricia Ahmed) and is forthcoming in the Rose Monograph Series of the American Sociological Association. Keywords: Gramsci, Hegemony, Social Theory Local Identifier: ismrg_cisj_8962 Abstract: What is the relationship between democracy and hegemony in Gramsci's Prison Notebooks? Salvadori and Galli della Loggia argue that hegemony is best understood as a theory of dictatorship and is therefore incompatible with democracy. Vacca argues that hegemony is inconceivable in the absence of democracy. I bridge these divergent readings by making two arguments. First, hegemony is a form of rationalized intellectual and moral leadership, and therefore depends on liberal democratic institutions. Second, hegemony is established through revolution. Gramsci thus paradoxically combines a deep appreciation for liberal democracy with a basically Leninist conception of politics.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phenomenological Take on the Problem of Reification
    A Phenomenological take on the Problem of Reification Wade A Bell Jr University of Gothenburg Abstract This article attempts to provide a new look at an old idea within Marxist discourse. Reification, as first imagined by Marx and later Lukacs, describes a process by which capitalism transforms human beings and social relations into things. Although the concept has been subjected to much abstraction and reinvention over the years, this article attempts to address a foundational problem that has remained unsolved since its inception: Close analysis reveals that the concept of reification has never been developed to include an example of an alternative or non-reified state of being. To solve this foundational problem, I look beyond Marxism and to the phenomenology of Maurice Merleau-Ponty. For Merleau-Ponty, the body is our primary vehicle for being-in-the-world, but what makes his philosophy unique is his emphasis on embodied subjectivity, as well as his dialectical conception of corporeality and being-in-the- world. From this view, the social and material worlds can best be understood as dynamic realms of intersubjectivity, while sentient beings always exist as subjects prior to the reifying effects of capitalism. Building upon an ongoing dialectic between the ideas of Marx, Lukacs, Merleau- Ponty and others, I will ultimately reframe the concept of reification as a objectifying tendency, precipitating from capitalism’s ability to obscure the lived experience of the phenomenal body. Keywords: Reification; Phenomenology; Marxism; Georg Lukacs; Maurice Merleau-Ponty 1. Introduction Perhaps no other concept in Marxist discourse has been subjected to as much conjecture, abstraction, and rethinking as reification.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory in Weberian Marxism: Patterns of Critical Social
    THEORY IN WEBERIAN MARXISM: PATTERNS OF CRITICAL SOCIAL THEORY IN LUKÁCS AND HABERMAS* Harry F. Dahms 1 ABSTRACT For Weberian Marxists, the social theories of Max Weber and Karl Marx are complementary contributions to the analysis of modern capitalist society. Combining Weber's theory of rationalization with Marx's critique of commodity fetishism to develop his own critique of reification, Georg Lukács contended that the combination of Marx's and Weber's social theories is essential to envisioning socially transformative modes of praxis in advanced capitalist society. By comparing Lukács's theory of reification with Habermas's theory of communicative action as two theories in the tradition of Weberian Marxism, I show how the prevailing mode of "doing theory" has shifted from Marx's critique of economic determinism to Weber s idea of the inner logic of social value spheres. Today, Weberian Marxism can make an important contribution to theoretical sociology by reconstituting itself as a framework for critically examining prevailing societal definitions of the rationalization imperatives specific to purposive-rational social value spheres (the economy, the administrative state, etc.). In a second step, Weberian Marxists would explore how these value spheres relate to each other and to value spheres that are open to the type of communicative rationalization characteristic of the lifeworld level of social organization. INTRODUCTION Since the early 1920s, the function of theory in Western Marxism has undergone a major transformation.1 So far manifesting itself as an increased willingness and ability in 2 modernist critical social theories to confront societal complexity, this change points toward a qualitatively different way of relating diverse social-theoretical projects to each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Reification-Thingification and Alienation ̶ Basic Concepts of Marxʼs Critique of Political Economy and Practical Materialsm ̶
    Hitotsubashi Journal of Social Studies 49 (2018), pp.1-28. Ⓒ Hitotsubashi University REIFICATION-THINGIFICATION AND ALIENATION ̶ BASIC CONCEPTS OF MARXʼS CRITIQUE OF POLITICAL ECONOMY AND PRACTICAL MATERIALSM ̶ ＊ TOMONAGA TAIRAKO Marxist scholars and researchers of the last half of the twentieth century failed to develop Marxʼs theory of alienation to go beyond achievements of the 1960s. Althusser played an important role in discrediting Marxʼs concept of alienation as presupposing humanistic essentialism and at the same time contaminated with Hegelian idealism, which had profoundly influenced the young Marx. According to Althusser, giving up the concept of alienation is a necessary step towards the scientific Marx that culminates in Capital. Since the 1970s, the dominance of “postmodern” thinking had almost completely swept away any sincere attempts to deal withMarx ʼs concept of alienation in a philosophical and scientific way. Under the sway of postmodernism, any serious philosophical projects to introduce the subject (or subject-object relations) as a key concept for comprehending human society and history were simply ignored or treated as contaminated with an obsolete “modern” way of thinking. In Japan, Wataru Hiromatsu, much influenced by Althusser, criticized the idea of alienation in the young Marx and characterized the development of Marxʼs thoughts as a transformation from the theory of alienation to that of reification. Withthistransformation hypothesis, he contributed to the propagation of the interpretation among Marxist scholars that the theory of alienation and that of reification are incompatible. This paper is based upon the paper: Versachlichung and Verdinglichung ‒ Basic Categories of Marxʼs Theory of Reification and Their Logical Construction, published in Hitotsubashi Journal of Social Studies, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Reification: a Marxist Perspective
    REIFICATION: A MARXIST PERSPECTIVE Val Burris University of Oregon California Sociologist, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1988, pp. 22-43 ABSTRACT: The concept of reification is used by Marx to describe a form of social consciousness in which human relations come to be identified with the physical properties of things, thereby acquiring an appearance of naturalness and inevitability. This essay presents a systematic reconstruction of Marx's theory of reification, with an emphasis on the social-structural dimensions of the concept. This reconstruction differs both from the conceptions of reification that are found in non-Marxist sociology and from the interpretations of some of Marx's followers. Marx's concept of reification is then taken as the model for a more general theory of ideology. In the final section of the essay, I show how this theory can be used to analyze the emergence of new forms of reification in capitalist society, including those that are based on the growth of technology, the spread of bureaucracy, and the rationalization of occupational selection. Sociology has been aptly described as a graveyard of critical concepts. Nowhere is this more true than in its appropriation and "operationalization" of concepts deriving from the Marxist theoretical tradition. Several critics have noted, for example, the emasculation which the concept of alienation has suffered at the hands of empirically oriented sociologists (Horton, 1964; Blackburn, 1969). In this instance, it is precisely the most crucial and distinguishing features of Marx's theory that are lost in the translation to mainstream sociology: the multi-dimensionality of the concept of alienation, the insight it provides into the inner structure of capitalist work relations, and the unity it forges between empirical analysis and radical critique.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Cite Complete Issue More Information About This Article
    Nova Economia ISSN: 0103-6351 ISSN: 1980-5381 Nova Economia Pimenta, Tomás Lima Alienation and fetishism in Karl Marx’s critique of political economy Nova Economia, vol. 30, no. 2, 2020, May-August, pp. 605-628 Nova Economia DOI: 10.1590/0103-6351/4958 Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=400465623009 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6351/4958 Alienation and fetishism in Karl Marx’s critique of political economy Alienação e fetichismo na crítica da economia política de Karl Marx Tomás Lima Pimenta (1) (1) New School for Social Research Abstract Resumo This paper explores the connection be- Esse artigo explora a conexão entre os conceitos de tween the concepts of alienation and com- alienação e fetichismo da mercadoria na obra de modity fetishism in the work of Karl Marx Karl Marx e seu papel na crítica da economia po- and their role in his critique of political lítica. O artigo analisa os diferentes tipos de alie- economy. It analyses the different types of nação presentes na obra de juventude de Marx, alienation present in his early work, linking articulando-os com o tema do fetichismo em sua them to the issue of fetishism in his mature obra madura, mostrando como a noção de aliena- work, and shows how the notion of alien- ção é subsumida pela teoria do fetichismo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spontaneous Generation of Excess and Its Capitalist Capture" (2009)
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2009 The ps ontaneous generation of excess and its capitalist capture Ryanson Alessandro Ku Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Ku, Ryanson Alessandro, "The spontaneous generation of excess and its capitalist capture" (2009). LSU Master's Theses. 2471. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2471 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SPONTANEOUS GENERATION OF EXCESS AND ITS CAPITALIST CAPTURE A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies by Ryanson Alessandro Ku B.S., The George Washington University, 2004 M.A., Louisiana State University, 2008 May 2009 To uncompromising radical thinkers everywhere, like Marx and Deleuze The answer may have emerged in the Manifesto . ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my dear advisors: Greg Stone, who gave me the opportunity to do graduate work, introduced me to theory, and insists on Marx (making him persist); John Protevi, who introduced me to Deleuze and demands a rigorous and complex thinker; and especially Greg Schufreider, the chair of the committee, who with patience, openness, and generosity guided me all the way, going so far as to let me present parts of this thesis in his course in nineteenth- century philosophy.
    [Show full text]