DOCSLIB.ORG

Marx's Concept of the Transcendence of Value Production

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marx's Concept of the Transcendence of Value Production Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2011 Marx's Concept of the Transcendence of Value Production Peter Hudis Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Hudis, Peter, "Marx's Concept of the Transcendence of Value Production" (2011). Dissertations. 204. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/204 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2011 Peter Hudis LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO MARX’S CONCEPT OF THE TRANSCENDENCE OF VALUE PRODUCTION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN PHILOSOPHY BY PETER HUDIS CHICAGO, IL AUGUST 2011 Copyright by Peter Hudis, 2011 All rights reserved ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank Prof. David Schweickart of the Department of Philosophy for his insightful comments and guidance in my development of this dissertation. He has been tremendously encouraging through all stages of its development. I also wish to thank Prof. Thomas Wren of the Department of Philosophy for his assistance and advice throughout my experience in the graduate program at Loyola University. They both have my heart-felt thanks. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS vi ABSTRACT vii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION: WHY EXPLORE MARX’S CONCEPT OF THE TRANSCENDENCE OF VALUE PRODUCTION? WHY NOW? 1 The Object and Approach of this Study 1 A Review of Recent Literature on Marx’s Philosophic Contribution 10 CHAPTER TWO: THE TRANSCENDENCE OF ALIENATION IN THE WRITINGS OF THE YOUNG MARX 53 Marx’s Beginnings, 1837-41 53 Marx’s Critique of Politics and Philosophy, 1842-43 63 Marx’s Critique of Economics and Philosophy, 1843-44 83 Discerning the Ideal Within the Real, 1845-47 112 Evaluating the Young’s Marx’s Concept of a Postcapitalist Society 125 CHAPTER THREE: THE CONCEPTION OF A POSTCAPITALIST SOCIETY IN THE DRAFTS OF CAPITAL 135 The “First Draft” of Capital: The Poverty of Philosophy (1847) 135 The “Second Draft” of Capital: The Grundrisse (1858) 147 The “Third Draft” of Capital: The Manuscript of 1861-63 194 188 CHAPTER FOUR; THE VISION OF THE NEW SOCIETY IN MARX’S CAPITAL 214 Volume One of Capital 214 217 Volumes Two and Three of Capital 245 CHAPTER FIVE: MARX’S LATE WRITINGS ON POSTCAPITALIST SOCIETY 265 The Impact of the Paris Commune on Marx 265 257 The Critique of the Gotha Program and “Notes on Wagner” 271 CONCLUSION: EVALUATING MARX’S WRITINGS ON POSTCAPITALIST SOCIETY 295 APPENDIX A: TRANSLATION OF MARX’S EXCERPT NOTES ON THE CHAPTER ‘ABSOLUTE KNOWLEDGE’ IN HEGEL’S PHENOMENOLOGY OF SPIRIT 306 BIBLIOGRAPHY 316 iv VITA 326 v ABBREVIATIONS MECW Marx Engels Collected Works (New York: International Publishers, 1975- 91) MEGA2 Marx-Engels Gesamtausgabe (Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1972-90 and Amsterdam: Akademie Verlag, 2000-08). vi ABSTRACT Although the literature produced on Marx’s philosophic contribution over the past 100 years is immense, most of it has focused on his analysis of the economic and political structure of capitalism, the “materialist conception of history,” and his critique of value production. There has been very little discussion or analysis, however, of his conception of what constitutes an alternative to capitalism. One reason for this is that it has long been assumed that Marx’s disdain for utopian socialists and his strictures against inventing “blueprints about the future” meant that his work does not address the possible content of a postcapitalist society that transcends value production. Yet while Marx never wrote a single work addressing the alternative to capitalism, critically important comments and suggestions are found throughout his writings about the transcendence of value production and the contours of a postcapitalist future. This study subjects Marx’s discussions of an alternative to capitalism to critical scrutiny by exploring all four decades of his philosophic output—from his early writings of the 1840s, to his various drafts of Capital and Capital itself, as well as his late writings on postcapitalism. This study examines not only Marx’s major and well-known works, but also his notebooks, drafts, letters and marginalia that are now being compiled as part of the MEGA2 project. vii CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION: WHY EXPLORE MARX’S CONCEPT OF THE TRANSCENDENCE OF VALUE PRODUCTION? WHY NOW? The Object and Approach of this Study Two decades after the collapse of statist Communism in the USSR and East Europe, which many claimed had consigned Marx’s work to the dustbin of history, a new climate has emerged in which his ideas are subject to renewed philosophical discussion and re-examination. This change is due, in part, to the phenomenon of capitalist globalization, which has sparked interest in Marx’s analysis of the inherently expansionary and global nature of capital, which he defined as “self-expanding value.” It is also due to the emergence of a global justice movement over the past two decades, which has called attention to the economic inequality, social instability and environmental destruction that have accompanied the global expansion of capitalism. The new climate of discussion on Marx also owes much to the financial and economic crisis that began in 2008, the most serious to afflict the world economy in the past 70 years. As a result of these and related developments, a number of new works on Marx have appeared, many of which explore heretofore neglected aspects of his thought—such as his writings on the world market, economic crisis, race and gender, non-Western societies, and the philosophical underpinning of his analysis of the logic of capital. These studies have appeared while a new edition of Marx’s complete works is being issued, the 1 2 Marx-Engels Gesamtausgabe (known as MEGA2), by an international team of scholars coordinated by the Internationale Marx-Engels-Stiftung in Amsterdam. MEGA2 will for the first time make Marx’s entire body of work available for scholarly analysis, in 114 volumes.1 It provides us with a new vantage point for exploring Marx’s work unencumbered by the partisan affiliations and polemical battles that have governed generations of earlier discussions of Marx’s philosophical contribution. Although the literature produced on Marx over the past 100 years is immense, most of it has focused on his analysis of the economic and political structure of capitalism, the “materialist conception of history,” and his critique of value production. There has been very little discussion or analysis, however, of his conception of what constitutes an alternative to capitalism. The lack of discussion of this issue has persisted in the face of the growth of the global justice movement, which has sponsored a series of forums, gatherings and conferences since the 1990s devoted to the theme “Another World is Possible.” This diverse movement indicates that despite the notion, which became widely voiced after 1989, that “there is no alternative”2 to capitalism, considerable numbers of people around the world are searching for such an alternative. 1The first Marx-Engels Gesamtausgabe was issued in 12 volumes from 1927-35. It is known as MEGA1. The new Gesamtausgabe, or MEGA2, began appearing in East Germany in 1972 and has been issued since 1990 by the Internationale Marx-Engels- Stiftung in conjunction with the International Institute of Social History in Amsterdam. It will eventually include everything Marx ever wrote, including his voluminous excerpt notebooks, most of which were unknown until recently. It is the only edition of Marx’s writings that meets the rigorous standards of modern textual editing. 2Former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher first coined this phrase in the early 1980s. For a discussion of its ideological impact, see István Mészáros, Beyond Capital (New York: Monthly Review Books, 1995). 3 However, there appears to be little or no consensus within the global justice movement as to what such an alternative might consist of. It is even hard to find consensus as to what theoretic resources need to be explored in thinking one out. As a result, the discussion of alternatives to capitalism at events sponsored by the global justice movement tends to remain rather abstract and limited to statements of intention. In some respects today’s situation has not changed much since 1918, when Otto Neurath of the Vienna Circle became planning minister of the short-lived Bavarian Socialist Republic. He wrote shortly after the collapse of this early effort to develop a postcapitalist social system: At the beginning of the [1918] revolution people were as unprepared for the task of a socialist economy in Germany as they had been for a war economy when war broke out in 1914. Any preparation for consciously shaping the economy was lacking. The technique of a socialist economy had been badly neglected. Instead, only pure criticism of the capitalist economy was offered and the Marxist pure theory of value and history was studied.3 It would be no exaggeration to say that 100 years later, the situation described by Neurath continues to largely define contemporary discussions of the issues raised by Marx’s work. There are several reasons for the lack of theoretical reflection and discussion of Marx’s view of the alternative to capitalism. Perhaps of foremost importance is the claim that he simply never addressed the issue. It has long been assumed that Marx’s disdain 3See Otto Neurath, “Experiences of Socialization in Bavaria” [1920], in Empiricism and Sociology, ed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Value's Law, Value's Metric
    Values Law Values Metric by P Co ckshott A Cottrell Research Rep ort RR Novemb er Values Law Values Metric W Paul Co ckshott and Allin F Cottrell septemb er Abstract It is argued that the metric space of exchanging commo dities is noneuclidean and characteristic of a system governed by a conservation law The p ossible can didates for what is conserved in commo dity exchange are reviewed with reference to inverted inputoutput matrices of the British economy Strong evidence is pre sented that the conserved substance is lab our The arguments of Mirowski and others regarding the appropriateness of such physicalist arguments are discussed What is meant by the law of value The phrase law of value is little used by Marx but p opular among his followers It has no precise denition of the typ e that one would exp ect for a scientic law Laws such as Ho okes law or Boyles law have a concise denition that any chemist or physicist could rep eat but it is doubtful if anywhere in the Marxist literature there exists a comparable denition of the law of value On the basis of what Ricardo and Marx wrote on the theory we would advance the following as a reasonable denition The law of value states that value understood as the labour time social ly necessary to produce a commodity is conserved in the exchange of commodities The advantages of this denition are that it is cast in the normal form of a sci entic law it is empirically testable it has a precise meaning and it emphasizes the fundamental Marxian prop osition that value cannot arise in circulation
    [Show full text]
  • Conversations with Stalin on Questions of Political Economy”
    WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS Lee H. Hamilton, Conversations with Stalin on Christian Ostermann, Director Director Questions of Political Economy BOARD OF TRUSTEES: ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Joseph A. Cari, Jr., by Chairman William Taubman Steven Alan Bennett, Ethan Pollock (Amherst College) Vice Chairman Chairman Working Paper No. 33 PUBLIC MEMBERS Michael Beschloss The Secretary of State (Historian, Author) Colin Powell; The Librarian of Congress James H. Billington James H. Billington; (Librarian of Congress) The Archivist of the United States John W. Carlin; Warren I. Cohen The Chairman of the (University of Maryland- National Endowment Baltimore) for the Humanities Bruce Cole; The Secretary of the John Lewis Gaddis Smithsonian Institution (Yale University) Lawrence M. Small; The Secretary of Education James Hershberg Roderick R. Paige; (The George Washington The Secretary of Health University) & Human Services Tommy G. Thompson; Washington, D.C. Samuel F. Wells, Jr. PRIVATE MEMBERS (Woodrow Wilson Center) Carol Cartwright, July 2001 John H. Foster, Jean L. Hennessey, Sharon Wolchik Daniel L. Lamaute, (The George Washington Doris O. Mausui, University) Thomas R. Reedy, Nancy M. Zirkin COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT THE COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT WORKING PAPER SERIES CHRISTIAN F. OSTERMANN, Series Editor This paper is one of a series of Working Papers published by the Cold War International History Project of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C. Established in 1991 by a grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Cold War International History Project (CWIHP) disseminates new information and perspectives on the history of the Cold War as it emerges from previously inaccessible sources on “the other side” of the post-World War II superpower rivalry.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Marxism and Educational Theory Mike Cole Summary While Marx
    1 Marxism and Educational Theory Mike Cole Summary While Marx and Engels wrote little on education, the educational implications of Marxism are clear. Education both reproduces capitalism and has the potential to undermine it. This entry, therefore, takes each of these propositions in turn. With respect to reproduction, it is informative to look at key texts by Althusser and Bowles and Gintis (and the latter’s legacy). As far as challenging capitalism is concerned, considerations are given of both theoretical developments and practical attempts to confront neoliberalism and enact socialist principles, the combination of which Marxists refer to as praxis. There have been constant challenges to Marxism since its conception, and the entry concludes with a look at two contemporary theories - Critical Race Theory and its primacy of ‘race’ over class - and intersectionality which has a tendency to marginalize class. Keywords: Marxism, Educational Theory, education and the reproduction of capitalism, Althusser, Bowles and Gintis, education and the undermining of capitalism, Rikowski, Neary and Saunders, contemporary theoretical challenges to Marxism. Marx and Engels on Education As Ronald F. Price (1977, p. 68) has argued, Marx’s vision of communism as the transcendence of alienation, and of a period when people become increasingly self-conscious and self- determining has manifold implications for education. However, for Marx and Engels the transformation of society is to come about through class struggle, and class action, rather than as a result of the spread of enlightened opinion throughout society; thus education did not figure prominently in their work, at least in the sense of being educated formally in institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Friedrich Engels in the Age of Digital Capitalism. Introduction
    tripleC 19 (1): 1-14, 2021 http://www.triple-c.at Engels@200: Friedrich Engels in the Age of Digital Capitalism. Introduction. Christian Fuchs University of Westminster, [email protected], http://fuchs.uti.at, @fuchschristian Abstract: This piece is the introduction to the special issue “Engels@200: Friedrich Engels in the Age of Digital Capitalism” that the journal tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique published on the occasion of Friedrich Engels’s 200th birthday on 28 November 2020. The introduction introduces Engels’s life and works and gives an overview of the special issue’s contributions. Keywords: Friedrich Engels, 200th birthday, anniversary, digital capitalism, Karl Marx Date of Publication: 28 November 2020 CC-BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons License, 2021. 2 Christian Fuchs 1. Friedrich Engels’s Life Friedrich Engels was born on 28 November 1820 in Barmen, a city in North Rhine- Westphalia, Germany, that has since 1929 formed a district of the city Wuppertal. In the early 19th century, Barmen was one of the most important manufacturing centres in the German-speaking world. He was the child of Elisabeth Franziska Mauritia Engels (1797-1873) and Friedrich Engels senior (1796-1860). The Engels family was part of the capitalist class and operated a business in the cotton manufacturing industry, which was one of the most important industries. In 1837, Engels senior created a business partnership with Peter Ermen called Ermen & Engels. The company operated cotton mills in Manchester (Great Britain) and Engelskirchen (Germany). Other than Marx, Engels did not attend university because his father wanted him to join the family business so that Engels junior already at the age of 16 started an ap- prenticeship in commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • The Socialist Minority and the Paris Commune of 1871 a Unique Episode in the History of Class Struggles
    THE SOCIALIST MINORITY AND THE PARIS COMMUNE OF 1871 A UNIQUE EPISODE IN THE HISTORY OF CLASS STRUGGLES by PETER LEE THOMSON NICKEL B.A.(Honours), The University of British Columbia, 1999 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of History) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August 2001 © Peter Lee Thomson Nickel, 2001 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Hi'sio*" y The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Date AkgaS-f 30. ZOO I DE-6 (2/88) Abstract The Paris Commune of 1871 lasted only seventy-two days. Yet, hundreds of historians continue to revisit this complex event. The initial association of the 1871 Commune with the first modern socialist government in the world has fuelled enduring ideological debates. However, most historians past and present have fallen into the trap of assessing the Paris Commune by foreign ideological constructs. During the Cold War, leftist and conservative historians alike overlooked important socialist measures discussed and implemented by this first- ever predominantly working-class government.
    [Show full text]
  • Solidarity Pamphlet No. 48: Women in the Spanish Revolution
    SOLI RARY KS 66044 (785)865-1374 THE SOLIDARITY CENTER 1119 MASSACHUSETS LAWRENCE, KS 66044 785-865-1374 Solidarity Pamphlet n.40 30p Solidarity! Radical Library 13 W 14* St. Lawrence, KS 66044 - 1 - \ In a waVit is clearly artificial to try to isolate the role of women la any se*^ of historical events. There are reasons, however. s sti11 te *• ^om time to time; for one thing f^^Lt^T^it cannot be assumeo\thatV.L when historians write about "people" or "work- ers" they mean women to nnything like the same extent as men. It is only recently that the history of women has begun to be studied witt attention appropriate the to women's significance - constituting approximately as wedo half of society at all levels, (i) *** Revolution md ^ivil War (Faber^ Faber "?w? «» fa g^. 9? )f T" "nd Kmiie Temime particinaMofof It" ET state that the " the .*aBiah Evolution of I was Sal a^d tL"ZT 936 massive and f* h0" de6P the *•"*«**« -»t. SortmL^etaUs or Sif ,°f where, buftt sour d°o tfSta.^ ^ In the K^S to ethei - ^« process of examining how wo^en^rufle ^£!+ *? ^^ coSions^^^^S havfr ^ ** as ele^e" foV^b^'^a*T ^3 well as for the prfsent-day w^eVs moment! * *« and repre^ive'inlhe'ext^me^S "°T Pf°r t0 I936 "*" «W»«**- and when improvement: id" ** *"***«* &> ^ gj ^^'^ys to entlrely women. Figures from the T,7=+,-V + ! ="2* ™ beneficial S.O.Payne, S°ClaleS (quoted to SSLto «^WeldenfeldJffTf& »i°°lson, that in the decaaTiqi^ ^' I970), show by only 67.* 2MSS " VT*™^? ^ WOaen,S Arthur could go to meltings ° Koestler, that the' men a£ gclio^Mli h 5 P.m., prepare •* ^^,^ ^1^ S1^?8<^^f»/« been iSoedT^eltureTL^^ °°^sation had, however, Politically, the ™' Z£S£3£t5Z^££gI9 sexes at a ^ ^T^bought votes for both 23, radical departure faTtS « has been said (by " Alvare^^r^^^ a^*' ' - 2 - merely doubled the power of her husband or confessor.
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery, Capitalism, and the “Proletariat”
    1 1 The Slave-Machine: Slavery, Capital- ism, and the “Proletariat” in The Black Jacobins and Capital Nick Nesbitt This essay argues that C. L. R. James’s Marxist humanism is inherently inade- quate for describing the distinction and transition between slavery and capitalism. To do so, the essay interrogates James’s famous claim in The Black Jacobins (1938) that the slaves of St. Domingue were “closer to a modern proletariat than any group of workers in existence at the time,” by comparing James’s understand- ing of the concept of proletariat—there and in World Revolution (1937)—with Marx’s various developments of the concept across the three volumes of Capital. This analysis distinguishes James’s political and historicist deployment of the term from Marx’s analytical usage of the notion in his categorial critique of capitalism.In contrast with James’s linear, Marxist-humanist understanding of the passage from slavery to capitalism, Marx himself demarcates a well-defined delineation between these two basic categories, understood in Capital as analytically (as opposed to historically) distinct modes of production.The essay thus concludes by analyzing Marx’s conceptual differentiation of slavery and industrial capitalism in Capital, drawing on Etienne Balibar’s analysis of the concepts of mode of production and transition in Reading Capital (1965). The slaves worked on the land, and, like revolutionary peasants everywhere, they aimed at the extermination of their oppressors. But working and living together in gangs of hundreds on the huge sugar-factories which covered the North Plain, they were closer to a modern proletariat than any group of workers in existence at the time, and the rising was, therefore, a thoroughly prepared and organized mass movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Karl Marx's Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy 150 Years Later
    Karl Marx’s Grundrisse Written between 1857 and 1858, the Grundrisse is the first draft of Marx’s critique of political economy and, thus, also the initial preparatory work on Capital. Despite its editorial vicissitudes and late publication, Grundrisse con- tains numerous reflections on matters that Marx did not develop elsewhere in his oeuvre and is therefore extremely important for an overall interpretation of his thought. In this collection, various international experts in the field, analysing the Grundrisse on the one-hundred-and-fiftieth anniversary of its composition, present a Marx in many ways radically different from the one who figures in the dominant currents of twentieth-century Marxism. The book demonstrates the relevance of the Grundrisse to an understanding of Capital and of Marx’s theo- retical project as a whole, which, as is well known, remained uncompleted. It also highlights the continuing explanatory power of Marxian categories for contemporary society and its present contradictions. Musto’s volume is divided into three parts. The first consists of eight chapters on the main themes that emerge from a reading of the Grundrisse: method, value, alienation, surplus value, historical materialism, ecological contradictions, socialism, and a compar- ison between the Grundrisse and Capital. The second reconstructs the biograph- ical and theoretical context in which Marx wrote these manuscripts; while the third presents a full account of their dissemination and reception throughout the world. With contributions from such scholars as Eric Hobsbawm and Terrell Carver, and covering subject areas such as political economy, philosophy and Marxism, this book is likely to become required reading for serious scholars of Marx across the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 33, Numbers 1-2, Fall 2019-Spring 2020 • Realism Published Twice Yearly, Mediations Is the Journal of the Marxist Literary Group
    Volume 33, Numbers 1-2, Fall 2019-Spring 2020 • Realism Published twice yearly, Mediations is the journal of the Marxist Literary Group. We publish dossiers of translated material on special topics and peer-reviewed general issues, usually in alternation. General inquiries and submissions should be directed to [email protected]. We invite scholarly contributions across disciplines on any topic that engages seriously with the Marxist tradition. Manuscripts received will be taken to be original, unpublished work not under consideration elsewhere. Articles should be submitted electronically in a widely-used format. Manuscripts should not exceed reasonable article length, and should be accompanied by an abstract of up to 300 words, including six keywords. Articles will be published in MLA endnote format, and should be submitted with the author’s name and affiliation on a separate cover page to facilitate blind peer review. Photographs, tables, and figures should be sent as separate files in a widely- used format. Written permission to reproduce copyright-protected material must be obtained by the author before submission. Books for review should be sent to: Mediations Department of English (MC 162) 601 South Morgan Street University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago IL 60607-7120 USA Articles published in Mediations may be reproduced for scholarly purposes without express permission, provided the reproduction is accompanied by full citation information. For archives and further information, visit http://www.mediationsjournal.org Cover
    [Show full text]
  • Hegemony and Democracy in Gramsci's Prison Notebooks
    Hegemony and Democracy in Gramsci’s Prison Notebooks Dylan Riley Antonio Gramsci is once again moving to the center of debates in contemporary social theory. Sociologists have taken up the concepts of hegemony and civil society to analyze regimes and social movements (Riley 2010; Tugal 2009). Political theorists have used Gramsci as an inspiration for developing the idea of radical democracy (Laclau and Mouffe 1985). Scholars of international relations have found Gramsci’s focus on global processes useful for analyzing neo-liberalism (Morton 2004, 125-127). Gramsci’s work has also been central in the attempt to elaborate a “sociological Marxism” that moves beyond both the statist and economistic biases of more traditional forms of Second and Third International historical materialism (Burawoy 2003; Wright 2010). But despite this outpouring of recent interest, many of the key elements of Gramsci’s political theory remain obscure. In this context, this essay returns to the Prison Notebooks1 to ask a specific question: “How did Gramsci conceive of the connection between democracy and hegemony?” This question has already generated a substantial body of scholarship. But most of it can be placed into one of two positions. One interpretation views hegemony as a theory of revolutionary dictatorship: a “Leninism” for the West (Galli della Loggia 1977, 69; Salvadori 1977, 40-41). These writers tend to be highly critical of the various attempts by the Partito Comunista Italiano (Italian Communist Party, PCI) to use Gramsci as a symbolic justification
    [Show full text]
  • Exports and Externalities: the Other Side of Trade and Ecological Risk
    University of Heidelberg Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series No. 481 Exports and Externalities: the other side of trade and ecological risk Travis Warziniack, David Finnoff, Jason F. Shogren, Jonathan Bossenbroek, and David Lodge April 2009 Exports and Externalities: the other side of trade and ecological risk∗ Travis Warziniack,y David Finnoff and Jason F Shogren,z Jonathan Bossenbroek,xDavid Lodge{ Abstract This paper develops a general equilibrium model to measure welfare effects of taxes for correcting environmental externalities caused by domestic trade, focusing on exter- nalities that arise through exports. Externalities from exports come from a number of sources. Domestically owned ships, planes, and automobiles can become contaminated while visiting other regions and bring unwanted pests home, and species can be in- troduced by contaminated visitors that enter a region to consume goods and services. The paper combines insights from the public finance literature on corrective environ- mental taxes and trade literature on domestically provided services. We find that past methods for measuring welfare effects are inadequate for a wide range of externalities and show the most widely used corrective mechanism, taxes on the sector imposing the environmental externality, may often do more harm than good. The motivation for this ∗Thanks to ISIS team members (http://www.math.ualberta.ca/ mathbio/ISIS/), grants from the Na- tional Sea Grant network, and the NSF (DEB 02-13698) for financial support. yUniversity of Heidelberg, Bergheimer Strasse 20, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany; [email protected] heidelberg.de zUniversity of Wyoming xUniversity of Toledo {University of Notre Dame 1 paper is the expansion of invasive species' ranges within the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Karl Marx's Thoughts on Functional Income Distribution - a Critical Analysis
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Herr, Hansjörg Working Paper Karl Marx's thoughts on functional income distribution - a critical analysis Working Paper, No. 101/2018 Provided in Cooperation with: Berlin Institute for International Political Economy (IPE) Suggested Citation: Herr, Hansjörg (2018) : Karl Marx's thoughts on functional income distribution - a critical analysis, Working Paper, No. 101/2018, Hochschule für Wirtschaft und Recht Berlin, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/175885 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Institute for International Political Economy Berlin Karl Marx’s thoughts on functional income distribution – a critical analysis Author: Hansjörg Herr Working Paper, No.
    [Show full text]