DOCSLIB.ORG

LTP SEA Scoping Report (2) 1 Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Health Impact Assessment 2 1.2 Habitat Regulations Assessment 3 2 County Durham Local Transport Plan 3 5 3 The SEA Scoping Stage 8 4 Links with Other Plans and Programmes 9 5 Establishing the Baseline 16 5.1 Central Durham 17 5.2 North and East Durham 29 5.3 South Durham 44 5.4 West Durham 57 5.5 Data limitations 72 6 Environmental Problems and Constraints 73 7 Likely Evolution of Baseline without LTP3 81 8 Description of Areas likely to be Significantly Affected 86 9 SEA Objectives and Indicators 87 10 Next Stages and Methodology 91 Appendices 1 Appendix 1: Review of other plans, policy and programmes 96 2 Appendix 2: Review of Baseline Information 230 3 Appendix 3: Natura 2000 Sites 322 LTP SEA Scoping Report (2) 1 Introduction 1 Introduction 1.1 The County Durham Local Transport Plan is being prepared by Durham County Council to set out the strategic objectives, policies and targets for developing transport systems and services in the County between 2011 and 2016. It will also include an implementation plan to present in more detail how those objectives, policies and targets will be delivered. 1.2 European Directive 2001/42/EEC (‘the SEA Directive’) requires that the preparation of Local Transport Plans includes a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) to ensure environmental considerations are systematically addressed in the process and integrated into the decisions made and policy options selected. The SEA is also to ensure that any significant adverse effects are identified and mitigated as far as possible, both in the preparation and implementation stages of the plan. 1.3 It is important that the SEA runs in parallel with the LTP preparation process and informs LTP development at every stage. The SEA itself should be conducted in five main stages which correspond to key stages of the LTP preparation process: Box 1 Main Stages of SEA Stage A – Setting the context and establishing the baseline Stage B – Deciding on the scope of the study and developing alternatives Stage C – Assessing the effects of the LTP Stage D – Consulting on the draft LTP and the Environmental Report Stage E – Monitoring the significant effects on the environment of implementing the LTP 1.4 The SEA of County Durham LTP3 is being carried out in accordance with the SEA Directive and with reference to Transport Analysis Guidance (TAG) Unit 2.11 ‘Strategic Environmental Assessment Guidance for Transport Plans and Programmes’ published by the Department for Transport (DfT) in April 2004. The latter document sets out national guidance for complying with the requirements of the SEA Directive in the preparation of Transport Plans. The SEA will incorporate the Health Impact Assessment (HIA) of LTP3 which is also required under the statutory guidance. 1.1 Health Impact Assessment 1.5 The DfT LTP3 guidance indicates that consideration of 'Human Health' is required in an SEA and that a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) is an integral part of the SEA to identify and inform health issues in plans. 1.6 Undertaking an HIA as part of the SEA should provide an evidence base to help the decision making process in developing an effective LTP and to mitigate the negative effects on health and well-being (whether physical and/or mental health). In addition it should help: Secure consistency between LTP3 and work associated with Sustainable Community Strategies and Local Area Agreements 2 LTP SEA Scoping Report (2) Introduction 1 Coordinate public health concerns in respect of air quality, noise and climate change relating to LTP3 Contribute to the wider agenda relating to quality of life and reducing health inequalities 1.7 Draft guidance by the Department of Health aims to help authorities assess the health effects of their plans and programmes and is based on current good practice. The guidance recommends that the assessment of the impact of local transport plans should consider the following topics: Transport to work, shops, schools and healthcare Walking and cycling Community severance Frequency and severity of crashes Collisions causing injury and fatal accidents Air pollution, noise Ageing population and increasing disability 1.8 In developing the approach to undertake the HIA as part of the SEA of County Durham LTP3 the following guidance will be used: Draft Guidance on Health in Strategic Environmental Assessment, Consultation Document, Department of Health 2007 Improving Health in the North East through Transport Solutions; Atkins, Cavill Associates, University of Oxford, University of Newcastle; March 2009 1.2 Habitat Regulations Assessment 1.9 Habitat Regulations Assessment is required to establish whether LTP3 is likely to have any significant effects on the integrity of the European network of sites of importance for biodiversity. This include Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) established for the conservation of habitats under EC Directive 92/43/EEC (the Habitats Directive), Special Protection Areas (SPAs) established for the conservation of bird species under EU Directive 79/409/EEC (the Birds Directive), and Ramsar Sites, established under the Ramsar Convention to conserve wetlands of international importance. Collectively, these internationally important sites are referred to as Natura 2000 sites. 1.10 A Habitat Regulations Assessment screening exercise is being carried out in parallel with the Strategic Environmental Assessment to establish whether any aspects of the LTP3 are likely - either on their own or in combination with any other plan or programme - to have any significant effects on the integrity of the European network of Natura 2000 sites. If the screening exercise identifies areas of possible significant impact then further assessment (Appropriate Assessment) will be undertaken to examine the likely impact in more detail and identify appropriate measures to avoid or mitigate it where its significance cannot be disproved. 1.11 Appendix 3 sets out the Natura 2000 sites in and around County Durham that are being taken into account in the screening exercise. It lists their reason for designation, the conservation objectives that apply to them, and the principle threats and vulnerabilities which relate to the habitats and species of concern. This forms the basis of the Habitats Regulations Assessment screening exercise which will cross-reference this information with the different elements of the County Durham LTP3 in order to establish the potential areas and severity of likely impacts. 1.12 The following guidance documents will be used to inform the Habitat Regulations Assessment / Appropriate Assessment process: Appropriate Assessment of Plans" by Scott Wilson et al 2006, LTP SEA Scoping Report (2) 3 1 Introduction Managing Natura 2000 sites The provisions of Article 6 of the Habitats Directive 92/43/CEE (EC 2000) Assessment of plans and projects significantly affecting Natura 2000 sites Methodological guidance on the provisions of Article 6(3) and (4) of the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC (EC Nov 2001) and; DCLG Planning for the Protection of European Sites : Appropriate Assessment Guidance for Regional Spatial Strategies and Local Development Documents (2006) 4 LTP SEA Scoping Report (2) County Durham Local Transport Plan 3 2 2 County Durham Local Transport Plan 3 2.1 The third Local Transport Plan (LTP3) for County Durham will set out the objectives, policies and targets for the development of transport services and systems in the County from 2011 and is intended to have a ten year time-span. It follows on from LTP1 (2001 – 2006) and LTP2 (2006 – 2011), the second of which was also subject to a SEA. 2.2 LTP3 will direct the spending of capital funds on transport measures in the County and also detail how transport programmes and schemes will interact with other policy areas such as health, environment and regeneration. 2.3 The overarching priorities for LTP3 have been largely decided through national guidance which sets out 5 key goals and related challenges. These will be used to frame the County Durham LTP3 objectives and policies: LTP SEA Scoping Report (2) 5 2 County Durham Local Transport Plan 3 Box 2 LTP3 Key Goals 1) Support Economic Growth Cross network challenge (national policy) Reduce lost productive time including by maintaining or improving the reliability and predictability of journey times on key local routes for business, commuting and freight Improve the connectivity and access to labour markets of key business centres Deliver the transport improvements required to support the sustainable provision housing, and in particular the PSA target of increasing supply to 240,000 net additional dwellings per annum to 2016 Ensure local transport networks are resistant and adaptable to shocks and impacts such as economic shocks, adverse weather, accidents, terrorist attacks and impacts of climate change 2) Reduce Carbon Emissions Cross network challenge: Deliver quantified reductions in greenhouse gas emissions consistent with the Climate Change Bill and EU targets Cities and Regional Networks Challenge Deliver quantified reductions in greenhouse gas emissions within cities and regional networks, taking account of cross-network policy measures 3) Promote equality of opportunity Cross network challenge Enhance social inclusion by enabling disadvantaged people to connect with employment opportunities, key services, social networks and goods through improving accessibility, availability, affordability and acceptability Cities and Regional Networks challenges Enhance social inclusion and the regeneration
Recommended publications
  • Subject Guide 1 – Records Relating to Inclosure

    Subject Guide 1 – Records Relating to Inclosure

    Durham County Record Office County Hall Durham DH1 5UL Telephone: 03000 267619 Email: [email protected] Website: www.durhamrecordoffice.org.uk Subject Guide 1 – Records Relating to Inclosure Issue no. 19 July 2020 Contents Introduction 1 Organisation of List 2 Alphabetical List of Townships 2 A 2 B 2 C 3 D 4 E 4 F 4 G 4 H 5 I 5 K 5 L 5 M 6 N 6 O 6 R 6 S 7 T 7 U 8 W 8 Introduction Inclosure (occasionally spelled “enclosure”) refers to a reorganisation of scattered land holdings by mutual agreement of the owners. Much inclosure of Common Land, Open Fields and Moor Land (or Waste), formerly farmed collectively by the residents on behalf of the Lord of the Manor, had taken place by the 18th century, but the uplands of County Durham remained largely unenclosed. Inclosures, to consolidate land-holdings, divide the land (into Allotments) and fence it off from other usage, could be made under a Private Act of Parliament or by general agreement of the landowners concerned. In the latter case the Agreement would be Enrolled as a Decree at the Court of Chancery in Durham and/or lodged with the Clerk of the Peace, the senior government officer in the County, so may be preserved in Quarter Sessions records. In the case of Parliamentary Enclosure a Local Bill would be put before Parliament which would pass it into law as an Inclosure Act. The Acts appointed Commissioners to survey the area concerned and determine its distribution as a published Inclosure Award.
  • Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale Part of VC65

    Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale Part of VC65

    Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale part of VC65 JOHN L. DURKIN MSc. MIEEM BSBI Recorder for County Durham 25 May Avenue. Winlaton Mill, Blaydon, NE21 6SF [email protected] Contents Introduction to the rare plants register Notes on plant distribution and protection The individual species accounts in alphabetical order Site Index First published 2010. This is the 2011, second edition. Improvements in the 2011 edition include- An additional 10% records, most of these more recent and more precise. One kilometre resolution maps for upland and coastal species. My thanks to Bob Ellis for advice on mapping. The ―County Scarce‖ species are now incorporated into the main text. Hieracium is now included. This edition is ―regionally aligned‖, that is, several species which are county rare in Northumberland, but were narrowly rejected for the Durham first edition, are now included. There is now a site index. Cover picture—Dark Red Helleborine at Bishop Middleham Quarry, its premier British site. Introduction Many counties are in the process of compiling a County Rare Plant Register, to assist in the study and conservation of their rare species. The process is made easier if the county has a published Flora and a strong Biological Records Centre, and Durham is fortunate to have Gordon Graham's Flora and the Durham Wildlife Trust‘s ―Recorder" system. We also have a Biodiversity project, based at Rainton Meadows, to carry out conservation projects to protect the rare species. The purpose of this document is to introduce the Rare Plant Register and to give an account of the information that it holds, and the species to be included.
  • Newton Aycliffe Regeneration Masterplan July 2013 Draft 3, Version 10 (Stakeholder Consultation)

    Newton Aycliffe Regeneration Masterplan July 2013 Draft 3, Version 10 (Stakeholder Consultation)

    DRAFT Newton Aycliffe Regeneration Masterplan July 2013 Draft 3, Version 10 (Stakeholder Consultation) Newton Aycliffe Masterplan – Draft Contents Page 1.0. Introduction ....................................................................................................3 2.0. Profile of Newton Aycliffe ...........................................................................4 3.0. Strategic Context ........................................................................................15 4.0. Key Issues and Challenges......................................................................19 5.0. Delivery Approach ......................................................................................22 6.0. Project Delivery ...........................................................................................27 7.0. DELIVERY PLAN..........................................................................................32 APPENDICES............................................................................................................36 APPENDIX 1 – SWOT ANALYSIS........................................................................36 APPENDIX TWO – STRATEGIC CONTEXT.......................................................37 Draft 3, Vs 10 Page 2 of 38 Newton Aycliffe Masterplan – Draft 1.0. Introduction 1.1. Purpose This masterplan provides a summary of the detailed programme of regeneration and investment activity that is taking place or is planned in Newton Aycliffe. It identifies the strategic context which underlies delivery
  • ON the WORK of MID DURHAM AAP… March 2018

    ON the WORK of MID DURHAM AAP… March 2018

    A BRIEF ‘HEADS UP’ ON THE WORK OF MID DURHAM AAP… March 2018 WELCOME Welcome to your March edition of the AAPs e-bulletin / e-newsletter. In this month’s edition we will update you on: - Mid Durham’s next Board meeting - Community Snippets - Partner Updates For more detailed information on all our meetings and work (notes, project updates, members, etc) please visit our web pages at www.durham.gov.uk/mdaap or sign up to our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/pages/Mid-Durham-Area-Action- Partnership-AAP/214188621970873 MID DURHAM AAP - March Board Meeting The Mid Durham AAP will be holding its next Board meeting on Wednesday 14th March 2018 at 6pm in New Brancepeth Village Hall, Rock Terrace, New Brancepeth, DH7 7EP On the agenda will be presentation on the proposed Care Navigator Programme which is a person-centred approach which uses signposting and information to help primary care patients and their carers move through the health and social care system. There will also be several Area Budget projects coming to the Board including the Deernees Paths and an Environment Improvement Pot that if approved will start later this year. We ask that you register your attendance beforehand by contacting us on 07818510370 or 07814969392 or 07557541413 or email middurhamaap.gov.uk. Community Snippets Burnhope – The Community Centre is now well underway and is scheduled for completion at the end of May. The builder – McCarricks, have used a drone to take photos… Butsfield Young Farmers – Similar to Burnhope, the young Farmers build is well under way too and is due for completion in mid-March… Lanchester Loneliness Project – Several groups and residents in Lanchester are working together to tackle social isolation within their village.
  • On the Breccia Gashes of the Durham Coast. Lebour.G.A

    On the Breccia Gashes of the Durham Coast. Lebour.G.A

    Durham E-Theses Some aspects of the geomorphology of the Durham coast Westgate, W. A. How to cite: Westgate, W. A. (1957) Some aspects of the geomorphology of the Durham coast, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/8519/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. SOME ASPECTS OF THE G-EOMQRPHOLO GY OP THE DUHHAM COAST W.A. Westgate, B.Sc. Submitted for the Degree of Ph.D. in the University of Durham. February, 1957. Itmm?, not ** > \ i3i (i) This research was carried out whilst I was in receipt of a Nature Conservancy Research Studentship "between July 1953 and July 1955.
  • Contents Hawthorn Dene, 1, 5-Jul-1924

    Contents Hawthorn Dene, 1, 5-Jul-1924

    Northern Naturalists’ Union Field Meeting Reports- 1924-2005 Contents Hawthorn Dene, 1, 5-jul-1924 .............................. 10 Billingham Marsh, 2, 13-jun-1925 ......................... 13 Sweethope Lough, 3, 11-jul-1925 ........................ 18 The Sneap, 4, 12-jun-1926 ................................... 24 Great Ayton, 5, 18-jun-1927 ................................. 28 Gibside, 6, 23-jul-1927 ......................................... 28 Langdon Beck, 7, 9-jun-1928 ............................... 29 Hawthorn Dene, 8, 5-jul-1928 .............................. 33 Frosterley, 9 ......................................................... 38 The Sneap, 10, 1-jun-1929 ................................... 38 Allenheads, 11, 6-july-1929 .................................. 43 Dryderdale, 12, 14-jun-1930 ................................. 46 Blanchland, 13, 12-jul-1930 .................................. 49 Devil's Water, 14, 15-jun-1931 ............................. 52 Egglestone, 15, 11-jul-1931 ................................. 53 Windlestone Park, 16, June? ............................... 55 Edmondbyers, 17, 16-jul-1932 ............................. 57 Stanhope and Frosterley, 18, 5-jun-1932 ............. 58 The Sneap, 19, 15-jul-1933 .................................. 61 Pigdon Banks, 20, 1-jun-1934 .............................. 62 Greatham Marsh, 21, 21-jul-1934 ........................ 64 Blanchland, 22, 15-jun-1935 ................................ 66 Dryderdale, 23, ..................................................... 68 Raby Park,
  • LTP3 Appendices Document

    LTP3 Appendices Document

    LTP3 Appendices Document 1 The Weardale Line Concept 3 2 Outline Case for a New Station on the Durham Coast Line 9 3 The Leamside Line 11 4 LTP3 Policies & Daughter Strategies 13 5 Minor Schemes Review 43 6 Durham City 50 7 Outline Case for East Durham Link Road - Remaining Stage 59 8 Rights Of Way Improvement Plan Summary 62 9 Regeneration Statement Summary 64 10 Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS) Summary 67 11 Performance Indicators 71 12 Main Towns Profiles 73 13 Settlements 75 14 Area Action Partnerships 87 LTP3 Appendices Document 1 .0 The Weardale Line Concept Durham County Council 2 LTP3 Appendices Document The Weardale Line Concept 1.0.1 Any reference to the Weardale Line in this document means the branch railway line between Darlington and Eastgate that provides an increasingly important sustainable transport link for the connectivity of settlements in the south west of the county with Darlington and Tees Valley. Background 1.0.2 The Weardale Line was originally part of the Stockton and Darlington Railway, which was the first public passenger steam railway in the world. The extent of the line which remains today was once part of a much wider network in the Bishop Auckland area. 1.0.3 It had played an important role for many years, especially for people commuting to and from work in the Darlington and Tees Valley areas as well as transporting bulk materials from the cement works at Eastgate until its closure in the early 1990's. 1.0.4 Two railway museums have since been located adjacent to the line.....one at the North Road station in Darlington and more recently, the National Railway Museum Annex, Locomotion, at Shildon.
  • Northumberland and Durham Family History Society Unwanted

    Northumberland and Durham Family History Society Unwanted

    Northumberland and Durham Family History Society baptism birth marriage No Gsurname Gforename Bsurname Bforename dayMonth year place death No Bsurname Bforename Gsurname Gforename dayMonth year place all No surname forename dayMonth year place Marriage 933ABBOT Mary ROBINSON James 18Oct1851 Windermere Westmorland Marriage 588ABBOT William HADAWAY Ann 25 Jul1869 Tynemouth Marriage 935ABBOTT Edwin NESS Sarah Jane 20 Jul1882 Wallsend Parrish Church Northumbrland Marriage1561ABBS Maria FORDER James 21May1861 Brooke, Norfolk Marriage 1442 ABELL Thirza GUTTERIDGE Amos 3 Aug 1874 Eston Yorks Death 229 ADAM Ellen 9 Feb 1967 Newcastle upon Tyne Death 406 ADAMS Matilda 11 Oct 1931 Lanchester Co Durham Marriage 2326ADAMS Sarah Elizabeth SOMERSET Ernest Edward 26 Dec 1901 Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne Marriage1768ADAMS Thomas BORTON Mary 16Oct1849 Coughton Northampton Death 1556 ADAMS Thomas 15 Jan 1908 Brackley, Norhants,Oxford Bucks Birth 3605 ADAMS Sarah Elizabeth 18 May 1876 Stockton Co Durham Marriage 568 ADAMSON Annabell HADAWAY Thomas William 30 Sep 1885 Tynemouth Death 1999 ADAMSON Bryan 13 Aug 1972 Newcastle upon Tyne Birth 835 ADAMSON Constance 18 Oct 1850 Tynemouth Birth 3289ADAMSON Emma Jane 19Jun 1867Hamsterley Co Durham Marriage 556 ADAMSON James Frederick TATE Annabell 6 Oct 1861 Tynemouth Marriage1292ADAMSON Jane HARTBURN John 2Sep1839 Stockton & Sedgefield Co Durham Birth 3654 ADAMSON Julie Kristina 16 Dec 1971 Tynemouth, Northumberland Marriage 2357ADAMSON June PORTER William Sidney 1May 1980 North Tyneside East Death 747 ADAMSON
  • Sedgefield Local Plan Environment Chapter

    Sedgefield Local Plan Environment Chapter

    Sedgefield Borough Local Plan Page 1 ENVIRONMENT The Borough consists of distinctive landscape areas that together create its particular character and provide the setting for the built environment of the various towns and villages. Most of the towns and villages in the Borough developed rapidly in response to growth in industry and coal mining over the last 100 years and contain relics of the industrial past; some show evidence of their agricultural origins. Parts of twelve towns and villages are designated conservation areas. There are over 170 listed buildings of architectural or historic interest. The built environment provides the background to where people live, work and spend much of their leisure time and helps to create the identity of different places. The natural environment consists primarily of the countryside between and around settlements but also areas of open space within towns and villages. The countryside is mainly in agricultural use but is also a valuable resource for recreation, leisure and wildlife. The open spaces within settlements are of value for a variety of uses and provide an attractive setting to built development. Within the countryside there are areas recognised for their special quality and interest. There are four areas of historic landscape, three of which are designated as conservation areas, seven Sites of Special Scientific Interest and four scheduled ancient monuments. The landscape is varied and is divided into four characteristic areas: the Magnesian Limestone escarpment, the River Wear Valley Shelf, and River Wear Valley Area of Landscape Value, and the Southern and Eastern Lowlands. The Borough is fortunate in that there is little derelict land remaining from its industrial past.
  • Appendix 4: Details of Natura 2000 Sites Contents

    Appendix 4: Details of Natura 2000 Sites Contents

    Contents Appendix 4 1 Data sources 4 2 Allendale Moors 5 3 Alston Shingle Banks 11 4 Appleby Fells 13 5 Arkengarthdael, Gunnerside and Rees Moors 32 6 Arkle Beck Meadows 38 7 Bowes Moor 40 8 Bowlees & Friar House Meadows 46 9 Castle Eden Dene 48 10 Catton Lea Meadow 50 11 Cornriggs Meadow 52 12 Cotherstone Moor 54 13 Cowpen Marsh 60 14 Durham Coast 62 15 Far High House Meadows 65 16 Fothering Holme 67 17 Gingerfields 69 18 Grains O' th' Beck Meadows 71 19 Haggs Bank 73 20 Hannah's Meadows 75 21 Harkers House Meadows 77 Appendix 4: Details of Natura 2000 Sites Contents 22 Helbeck Wood 79 23 Hexhamshire Moors 81 24 Low Redford Meadows 87 25 Lune Forest 89 26 Mallerstang - Swaledale Head 98 27 Mere Beck Meadows 109 28 Middle Crossthwaite 111 29 Middle Side & Stonygill Meadows 113 30 Moorhouse and Cross Fell 115 31 Muggleswick, Stanhope, Edmundbyers Commons & Blanchland Moors 133 32 Ninebanks River Shingle 139 33 Peckriding Meadows 141 34 Rigg Farm and Stake Hill Meadows 143 35 River Eden & Tributaries 145 36 River Nent at Blagill 159 37 Seal Sands 161 38 Seaton Dunes & Common 175 39 South Gare & Coatham Sands 177 40 Swindale Wood 179 41 Tees & Hartlepool Foreshore 182 42 Thrislington Plantation 184 43 Upper Teesdale 186 Appendix 4: Details of Natura 2000 Sites Contents 44 West Newlandside Meadows 210 45 West Park Meadows 212 46 White Ridge Meadow 214 47 Whitfield Moor, Plenmeller and Ashholme Commons 217 48 Williamston River Shingle 224 49 Northumbria Coast EMS 226 50 Teesmouth & Cleveland Coast EMS 233 51 North Pennine Moors SPA 241 52 Northumbria Coast SPA (Durham Coast SSSI) 249 53 Teesmouth & Cleveland Coast SPA 254 Appendix 4: Details of Natura 2000 Sites 1 Data sources 1.1 Data sources and explanations: "Site Name and Designation" is accompanied by site-specific information on vulnerability taken from the relevant JNCC SAC / SPA data forms.
  • Durham Rare Plant Register 2016

    Durham Rare Plant Register 2016

    County Durham Rare Plant Register 2016 JOHN L. DURKIN MSc. MCIEEM BSBI Recorder for County Durham 25 May Avenue. Winlaton Mill, Blaydon, NE21 6SF [email protected] www.durhamnature.co.uk Contents Introduction to the rare plants register Notes on plant distribution and protection The individual species accounts in alphabetical order Site Index First published 2010. This is the 2016, fourth edition of the “RPR”, dedicated to Keith Cunningham, who helped so much with the early databases and in many other ways. Improvements in this edition include- The new English Red List is incorporated into this edition. An additional 10% records, most of these more recent and more precise. Cover picture—Bird’s Eye Primrose at Widdybank Fell. Introduction Most counties are in the process of compiling a County Rare Plant Register, to assist in the study and conservation of their rare species. The process is made easier if the county has a published Flora and a strong Biological Records Centre, and Durham is fortunate to have Gordon Graham's Flora and the Durham Wildlife Trust’s “Recorder" system. We have also had a Biodiversity project, based at Rainton Meadows, which until 2013 carried out conservation projects to protect the rare species. It is hoped that the “RPR” will act as a stimulus for local botanists to make special efforts to improve the database by recording these species. The register will be used to increase our understanding of the status and distribution of the rare species, and to aid and promote their conservation. Species Covered Three groups of vascular plant species are included.
  • The 1825 Stockton & Darlington Railway

    The 1825 Stockton & Darlington Railway

    The 1825 S&DR: Preparing for 2025; Significance & Management. The 1825 Stockton & Darlington Railway: Historic Environment Audit Volume 1: Significance & Management October 2016 Archaeo-Environment for Durham County Council, Darlington Borough Council and Stockton on Tees Borough Council. Archaeo-Environment Ltd for Durham County Council, Darlington Borough Council and Stockton Borough Council 1 The 1825 S&DR: Preparing for 2025; Significance & Management. Executive Summary The ‘greatest idea of modern times’ (Jeans 1974, 74). This report arises from a project jointly commissioned by the three local authorities of Darlington Borough Council, Durham County Council and Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council which have within their boundaries the remains of the Stockton & Darlington Railway (S&DR) which was formally opened on the 27th September 1825. The report identifies why the S&DR was important in the history of railways and sets out its significance and unique selling point. This builds upon the work already undertaken as part of the Friends of Stockton and Darlington Railway Conference in June 2015 and in particular the paper given by Andy Guy on the significance of the 1825 S&DR line (Guy 2015). This report provides an action plan and makes recommendations for the conservation, interpretation and management of this world class heritage so that it can take centre stage in a programme of heritage led economic and social regeneration by 2025 and the bicentenary of the opening of the line. More specifically, the brief for this Heritage Trackbed Audit comprised a number of distinct outputs and the results are summarised as follows: A. Identify why the S&DR was important in the history of railways and clearly articulate its significance and unique selling point.