DOCSLIB.ORG

The Aquatic Leaf Beetle Macroplea Mutica (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): Population Structure in Europe and the Signature of Zoochorous Dispersal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Aquatic Leaf Beetle Macroplea Mutica (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): Population Structure in Europe and the Signature of Zoochorous Dispersal The Aquatic Leaf Beetle Macroplea mutica (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): Population Structure in Europe and the Signature of Zoochorous Dispersal Dissertation with the aim of achieving a doctoral degree at the Faculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Natural Sciences Department of Biology of Universität Hamburg submitted by Jan-Jakob Laux Hamburg, 2014 ii ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................. VII ZUSAMMENFASSUNG ............................................................................................ IX LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................... XI LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................... XII 1- INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 - Dispersal ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 - Passive Dispersal of Freshwater Organisms ........................................................................................... 2 1.1.2 - Dispersal of Aquatic Organisms by Waterbirds ...................................................................................... 3 1.2 - Population Genetic Analyses in Dispersal Ecology .................................................................................... 5 1.2.1 - Detecting Genetic Evidence of Vector-Mediated Dispersal .................................................................... 6 1.2.2 - Population Genetic Markers .................................................................................................................... 8 1.2.2.1 - Microsatellites ................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2.2.2 - Mitochondrial DNA ........................................................................................................................ 9 1.2.3 - Population Genetic Software Tools....................................................................................................... 10 1.3 - Fully Aquatic Reed Beetles - The Genus Macroplea ................................................................................ 11 1.3.1 - Macroplea mutica (FABRICIUS 1792) .................................................................................................... 14 1.3.1.1 - Life Cycle ...................................................................................................................................... 14 1.3.1.2 - Respiration and Mobility ............................................................................................................... 15 1.3.1.3 - Population Genetic Structure of M. mutica ................................................................................... 16 1.3.1.4 - Passive Dispersal of M. mutica: Water and Waterbirds as Potential Vectors ................................ 17 1.3.1.5 - The Mute Swan Cygnus olor - a Potential Vector Species ............................................................ 18 1.4 - Objectives .................................................................................................................................................... 20 2 - MATERIAL AND METHODS .............................................................................. 21 2.1 - Origin of Samples........................................................................................................................................ 21 2.2 - Molecular Biology ....................................................................................................................................... 22 2.2.1 - DNA Extraction .................................................................................................................................... 22 2.2.2 - Development and Characterization of Microsatellite Markers for Macroplea mutica .......................... 22 2.2.2.1 - Construction of a Genomic DNA Library Enriched for Microsatellites ........................................ 22 2.2.2.2 - Microsatellite Primer Design ......................................................................................................... 23 2.2.2.3 - Microsatellite Primer Testing and Locus Screening ...................................................................... 23 2.2.2.4 - PCR Conditions ............................................................................................................................. 24 2.2.2.5 - Genotyping / Scoring..................................................................................................................... 24 2.2.3 - Amplification and Sequencing of Mitochondrial DNA ........................................................................ 25 2.3 - Population Genetic Analyses ...................................................................................................................... 25 2.3.1 - Characterization of Developed Microsatellite Markers ........................................................................ 25 2.3.1.1 - Tests for Null Alleles, Stuttering, Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium and Linkage Disequilibrium .... 25 2.3.1.2 - Validation of Markers - Test for Congruence with AFLP Data .................................................... 26 2.3.2 - Population Genetic Differentiation and Isolation by Distance .............................................................. 26 2.3.2.1 - Assessing Statistical Power of the Used Set of Microsatellites ..................................................... 26 2.3.2.2 - Population Genetic Differentiation ................................................................................................ 27 2.3.2.3 - Testing the Relative Performance of FST and RST Estimates ......................................................... 27 2.3.2.4 - Subdivision of Macroplea mutica Sampling Sites ......................................................................... 28 2.3.2.5 - Testing for Isolation by Distance .................................................................................................. 29 2.3.2.6 - Calculating Residual RST-Values................................................................................................... 30 2.3.2.7 - Construction of a Neighbor-Joining Tree ...................................................................................... 30 iii 2.3.2.8 - Principal Coordinate Analysis ....................................................................................................... 30 2.3.3 - Inferring the Number of Genetically Distinct Clusters ......................................................................... 30 2.3.3.1 - Inferring the Uppermost Level of Population Structure ................................................................ 31 2.3.3.2 - BAPS 5.2 ....................................................................................................................................... 32 2.3.3.3 - GENELAND ................................................................................................................................. 32 2.3.4 - Bayesian Inference of Migration Rates with MIGRATE-N .................................................................. 33 2.3.5 - Analysis of Mitochondrial DNA ........................................................................................................... 33 2.4 – GIS-Based Analyses ................................................................................................................................... 34 2.4.1 - Mapping and Visualizing of Swan Sightings and Movements.............................................................. 34 2.4.2 - Inferring the Direction of Swan Movements ......................................................................................... 34 2.4.3 - Local Swan Abundances and Swan Traffic between Sites.................................................................... 36 2.4.4 - Geographic Distances between Macroplea mutica Sampling Sites ...................................................... 38 2.4.5 - Mapping Beetle Sampling Locations against Landscape Features ....................................................... 38 2.4.6 - Testing for Correlation of Swan Movements and Abundances with Population Genetic Structure in Macroplea mutica ............................................................................................................................................ 38 2.4.6.1 - Pairwise Genetic Differentiation in M. mutica and Swan Sighting Data ...................................... 38 2.4.6.2 - Breakdown of Isolation by Distance and Swan Abundances ........................................................ 39 2.5 - Feeding Trials and Simulation of Gut Passage......................................................................................... 40 2.5.1 - Origin and Keeping Conditions of Plant Material and Beetles ............................................................. 40 2.5.2 - Simulation of Gut Passage .................................................................................................................... 40 2.5.2.1 - Gizzard Phase ................................................................................................................................ 40 2.5.2.2 - Intestinal Phase .............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Water Beetles
    Ireland Red List No. 1 Water beetles Ireland Red List No. 1: Water beetles G.N. Foster1, B.H. Nelson2 & Á. O Connor3 1 3 Eglinton Terrace, Ayr KA7 1JJ 2 Department of Natural Sciences, National Museums Northern Ireland 3 National Parks & Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage & Local Government Citation: Foster, G. N., Nelson, B. H. & O Connor, Á. (2009) Ireland Red List No. 1 – Water beetles. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover images from top: Dryops similaris (© Roy Anderson); Gyrinus urinator, Hygrotus decoratus, Berosus signaticollis & Platambus maculatus (all © Jonty Denton) Ireland Red List Series Editors: N. Kingston & F. Marnell © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 2009‐2016 Red list of Irish Water beetles 2009 ____________________________ CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................ 3 NOMENCLATURE AND THE IRISH CHECKLIST................................................................................................ 3 COVERAGE .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Curculionidae and Chrysomelidae Found in Aquatic Habitats in Wisconsin
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 8 Number 4 - Winter 1975 Number 4 - Winter Article 6 1975 December 1975 Curculionidae and Chrysomelidae Found in Aquatic Habitats in Wisconsin Lutz J. Bayer H. Jane Brockmann University of Wisconsin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Bayer, Lutz J. and Brockmann, H. Jane 1975. "Curculionidae and Chrysomelidae Found in Aquatic Habitats in Wisconsin," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 8 (4) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol8/iss4/6 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Bayer and Brockmann: Curculionidae and Chrysomelidae Found in Aquatic Habitats in Wisc THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST CURCULIONIDAE AND CHRYSOMELIDAE FOUND IN AQUATIC HABITATS IN WISCONSIN' Lutz J. Bayer2 and H. Jane Brockmann3 We became interested in aquatic weevils (Curculionidae) and leaf beetles (Chryso- melidae) during the Aquatic Entomology Course at the University of Wisconsin, in the spring of 1971. Many collections, taken from a variety of aquatic habitats in Wisconsin, contained weevils and leaf beetles. Most of the species were not fully treated in the keys found in aquatic entomology texts. We thought it would be useful to compile keys from the literature and present what is known of the distribution of these insects in Wisconsin. Nine species of weevils have been found in aquatic habitats in Wisconsin, representing seven genera, all belonging to the subtribe Hydronomi, and twenty-five species of leaf beetles, representing five genera in three subfamilies.
    [Show full text]
  • From Krasnoyarskii Krai (Russia) E.V
    Бiологiчний вiсник МДПУ імені Богдана Хмельницького 6 (3), стор. 248¢249, 2016 Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 6 (3), pp. 248¢249, 2016 SHORT COMMUNICATION UDC 595.768 NEW RECORDS OF DONACIA FABRICIUS, 1775 (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE: DONACIINAE) FROM KRASNOYARSKII KRAI (RUSSIA) E.V. Guskova1, E.N. Akulov2 1Altai State University, Lenina 61, Barnaul, RU–656049, Russia E-mail: [email protected] 2All-Russian Center of Plant Quarantine, Krasnoyarsk branch, Maerchaka 31a, Krasnoyarsk, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Two species of leaf beetles: Donacia cinerea Herbst, 1784 and D. marginata Hoppe, 1795 are newly recored for Eastern Siberia. Donacia dentata Hoppe, 1795 new data on the distribution from Krasnoyarskii Krai (Russia). Key words: Donacia, Chrysomelidae, Coleoptera, Krasnoyarskii Krai. Citation: Guskova, E.V., Akulov, E.N. (2016). The Cryptocephalinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of the Mongolian Altai. Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 6 (3), 248–72. Поступило в редакцию / Submitted: 18.09.2016 Принято к публикации / Accepted: 19.10.2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.15421/201692 © Guskova, Akulov, 2016 Users are permitted to copy, use, distribute, transmit, and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0. License INTRODUCTION Beetles of the genus Donacia Fabricius, 1775 are among the most common inhabitants of freshwater bodies: rivers, lakes, ponds, ditches, and are also found in swamps and wet meadows. In the Palaearctic fauna the genus Donacia is represented by 65 species (Bienkowski, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Seamless Maps and Management of the Bothnian Bay Seamboth - Final Report Authors
    Seamless Maps and Management of the Bothnian Bay SEAmBOTH - Final report Authors Bergdahl Linnea2, Gipson Ashley1, Haapamäki Jaakko1, Heikkinen Mirja5, Holmes Andrew2, Kaskela Anu6, Keskinen Essi1, Kotilainen Aarno6, Koponen Sampsa4, Kovanen Tupuna5, Kågesten Gustav3, Kratzer Susanne7, Nurmi Marco4, Philipson Petra8, Puro-Tahvanainen Annukka5, Saarnio Suvi1,5, Slagbrand Peter3, Virtanen Elina4. Co-authors Alasalmi Hanna4, Alvi Kimmo6*, Antinoja Anna1, Attila Jenni4, Bruun Eeva4, Heijnen Sjef9, Hyttinen Outi6, Hämäläinen Jyrki6, Kallio Kari4, Karén Virpi5, Kervinen Mikko4, Keto Vesa4, Kihlman Susanna6, Kulha Niko4, Laamanen Leena4, Niemelä Waltteri4, Nygård Henrik4, Nyman Alexandra6, Väkevä Sakari4 1Metsähallitus, 2Länsstyrelsen i Norrbottens län, 3Geological Survey of Sweden (SGU), 4Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), 5Centres for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment (ELY-centres), 6Geological Survey of Finland (GTK), 7Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, 8Brockmann Geomatics Sweden AB (BG), 9Has University of Applied Sciences, *Deceased Title: Seamless Maps and Management of the Bothnian Bay SEAmBOTH - Final report Cover photo: Eveliina Lampinen, Metsähallitus Authors: Bergdahl Linnea, Gipson Ashley, Haapamäki Jaakko, Heikkinen Mirja, Holmes Andrew, Kaskela Anu, Keskinen Essi, Kotilainen Aarno, Koponen Sampsa, Kovanen Tupuna, Kågesten Gustav, Kratzer Susanne, Nurmi Marco, Philipson Petra, Puro-Tahvanainen Annukka, Saarnio Suvi, Slagbrand Peter, Virtanen Elina. Contact details:
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance Document on the Strict Protection of Animal Species of Community Interest Under the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC
    Guidance document on the strict protection of animal species of Community interest under the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC Final version, February 2007 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 4 I. CONTEXT 6 I.1 Species conservation within a wider legal and political context 6 I.1.1 Political context 6 I.1.2 Legal context 7 I.2 Species conservation within the overall scheme of Directive 92/43/EEC 8 I.2.1 Primary aim of the Directive: the role of Article 2 8 I.2.2 Favourable conservation status 9 I.2.3 Species conservation instruments 11 I.2.3.a) The Annexes 13 I.2.3.b) The protection of animal species listed under both Annexes II and IV in Natura 2000 sites 15 I.2.4 Basic principles of species conservation 17 I.2.4.a) Good knowledge and surveillance of conservation status 17 I.2.4.b) Appropriate and effective character of measures taken 19 II. ARTICLE 12 23 II.1 General legal considerations 23 II.2 Requisite measures for a system of strict protection 26 II.2.1 Measures to establish and effectively implement a system of strict protection 26 II.2.2 Measures to ensure favourable conservation status 27 II.2.3 Measures regarding the situations described in Article 12 28 II.2.4 Provisions of Article 12(1)(a)-(d) in relation to ongoing activities 30 II.3 The specific protection provisions under Article 12 35 II.3.1 Deliberate capture or killing of specimens of Annex IV(a) species 35 II.3.2 Deliberate disturbance of Annex IV(a) species, particularly during periods of breeding, rearing, hibernation and migration 37 II.3.2.a) Disturbance 37 II.3.2.b) Periods
    [Show full text]
  • Meriuposkuoriainen (Macroplea Pubipennis) Espoonlahdella –Elinalueiden Hoito• Ja Käyttösuunnitelma
    MERIUPOSKUORIAINEN (1922) Suomen raportti EU:n komissiolle luontodirektiivin toimeenpanosta Stor natebock kaudelta 2001•2006 Macroplea pubipennis ©SYKE, valtakunnan rajat MML (lupa nro 7/MML/08) Johtopäätökset suojelutasosta Boreaalinen alue Alpiininen alue Suojelutason epäsuotuisa riittämätön • • kokonaisarvio heikkenevä Levinneisyysalue: epäsuotuisa riittämätön • Populaatio: ei tiedossa • Lajin elinympäristö: epäsuotuisa riittämätön • heikkenevä • Ennuste tulevaisuudesta epäsuotuisa riittämätön • heikkenevä • Sivu 1 Suomen raportti EU:n komissiolle luontodirektiivin Levinneisyysalue ja elinympäristöt toimeenpanosta kaudelta 2001•2006 Levinneisyysalue Lajin asuttamat elinympäristöt Boreaalinen alue Alpiininen alue Boreaalinen alue Alpiininen alue Pinta•ala (km2) 400 • 0.5 • Alueen määrittelyn 1990•2006 • 1990•2006 • ajankohta Tiedon laatu kohtalainen • huono • Kehitysuunta pienenevä • pienenevä • Muutoksen suuruus ei arvioitu • Kehityssuunnan 1940•2006 • 1990•2006 • tarkastelujakso Kehityssuunnan syyt •suora ihmisvaikutus • •suora ihmisvaikutus • •epäsuora ihmisvaikutus •epäsuora ihmisvaikutus Boreaalinen alue Alpiininen alue Suotuisan levinneisyysalueen pa (km2) > 400 • Lajille soveliaan elinympäristön pa (km2) 1 • Ennuste lajin tulevaisuudesta heikko • Populaatio Boreaalinen alue Alpiininen alue Minimipopulaatio 4 • Maksimipopulaatio ei arvioitu • Populaatiokoon yksikkö ruutu • Populaatiokoon tarkastelujakso 12/2006 • Populaatiokoon arviointimenetelmä perustuu osapopulaatioiden selvitykseen • tai otantaan Tiedon laatu kohtalainen •
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Sea Genetic Biodiversity: Current Knowledge Relating to Conservation Management
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Brage IMR Received: 21 August 2016 Revised: 26 January 2017 Accepted: 16 February 2017 DOI: 10.1002/aqc.2771 REVIEW ARTICLE Baltic Sea genetic biodiversity: Current knowledge relating to conservation management Lovisa Wennerström1* | Eeva Jansson1,2* | Linda Laikre1 1 Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, SE‐106 91 Stockholm, Sweden Abstract 2 Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, 1. The Baltic Sea has a rare type of brackish water environment which harbours unique genetic Norway lineages of many species. The area is highly influenced by anthropogenic activities and is affected Correspondence by eutrophication, climate change, habitat modifications, fishing and stocking. Effective genetic Lovisa Wennerström, Department of Zoology, management of species in the Baltic Sea is highly warranted in order to maximize their potential SE‐106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. for survival, but shortcomings in this respect have been documented. Lack of knowledge is one Email: [email protected] reason managers give for why they do not regard genetic diversity in management. Funding information Swedish Research Council Formas (LL); The 2. Here, the current knowledge of population genetic patterns of species in the Baltic Sea is BONUS BAMBI Project supported by BONUS reviewed and summarized with special focus on how the information can be used in (Art 185), funded jointly by the European management. The extent to which marine protected areas (MPAs) protect genetic diversity Union and the Swedish Research Council Formas (LL); Swedish Cultural Foundation in is also investigated in a case study of four key species.
    [Show full text]
  • HELCOM Lists of Threatened And/Or Declining Species and Biotopes/Habitats in the Baltic Sea Area
    Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings No.113 HELCOM lists of threatened and/or declining species and biotopes/habitats in the Baltic Sea area Helsinki Commission Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings No. 113 HELCOM lists of threatened and/or declining species and biotopes/ habitats in the Baltic Sea area Editors: Dieter Boedeker and Henning von Nordheim Helsinki Commission Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission Contact address for editors: German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN) BfN, Isle of Vilm, D-18581 Putbus, Germany Cover photo: Baltic low salinity reef community (Fucus serratus – stands with Gobius flavescens) on top of Adler Ground (photo BfN © Krause & Hübner) For bibliographic purposes this document should be cited to as: HELCOM 2007: HELCOM lists of threatened and/or declining species and biotopes/habitats in the Baltic Sea area Baltic Sea Environmental Proceedings, No. 113. Information included in this publication or extracts there of is free for citing on the condition that the complete reference of the publication is given as stated above. Copyright 2007 by the Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission - Helsinki Commission Layout: Hanna Paulomäki ISSN Table of Contents Preface.....................................................................................................................................6 Introduction .............................................................................................................................7 Lists:
    [Show full text]
  • HELCOM Red List
    SPECIES INFORMATION SHEET Macroplea mutica English name: Scientific name: The aquatic leaf beetle Macroplea mutica Taxonomical group: Species authority: Class: Insecta Fabricius, 1792 Order: Coleoptera Family: Chrysomelidae Subspecies, Variations, Synonyms: Generation length: – Haemonia mutica Past and current threats (Habitats Directive Future threats (Habitats Directive article 17 article 17 codes): codes): – – IUCN Criteria: HELCOM Red List LC – Category: Least Concern Global / European IUCN Red List Category: Habitats Directive: NE/NE – Protection and Red List status in HELCOM countries: Denmark –/–, Estonia –/–, Finland –/LC, Germany –/–, Latvia –/–, Lithuania –/–, Poland –/CR, Russia –/–, Sweden –/LC Distribution and status in the Baltic Sea region This halophile aquatic beetle lives on the coasts of the Baltic Sea, Mediterranean, and Caspian Sea, and is known also from freshwater e.g. lake Balaton in Hungary. There are some freshwater records also from Finland and Sweden. On the Atlantic coast, it is associated with saline lagoons. In the southern Baltic Sea, M. mutica lives in inlets (Bodden) of the Danish and Polish coast. Its formerly known localities in the Puck bay and in the environment of Gdańsk have not been confirmed for several decades. In the north it appears to be more common and there is no indication that the population has decreased there. © HELCOM Red List Benthic Invertebrate Expert Group 2013 www.helcom.fi > Baltic Sea trends > Biodiversity > Red List of species SPECIES INFORMATION SHEET Macroplea mutica Distribution map The georeferenced records of species compiled from the Danish national database for marine data (MADS), the species database of Swedish Species Information Centre (Artportalen), Estonian eBiodiversity web interface, data of the Finnish coleopteran expert team and Silfverberg (1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Variation in Body and Ovipositor Sizes in the Leaf Beetle Plateumaris Constricticollis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and Its Association with Climatic Conditions and Host Plants
    Eur. J. Entomol. 104: 165–172, 2007 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1214 ISSN 1210-5759 Geographic variation in body and ovipositor sizes in the leaf beetle Plateumaris constricticollis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and its association with climatic conditions and host plants TEIJI SOTA1, MASAKAZU HAYASHI2 and TSUYOSHI YAGI3 1Department of Zoology, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan; e-mail: [email protected] 2Hoshizaki Green Foundation, Izumo, Shimane, 691-0076, Japan 3The Museum of Nature and Human Activities, Hyogo, Sanda, Hyogo, 669-1546, Japan Keywords. Chrysomelidae, life history, molecular phylogeny, wetland, 28S rRNA gene Abstract. Plateumaris constricticollis is a donaciine leaf beetle endemic to Japan, which lives in wetlands and uses Cyperaceae and Poaceae as larval hosts. We analyzed geographic variation in body size and ovipositor dimensions in three subspecies (constricticol- lis, babai, and toyamensis) in different climatic conditions and on different host plants. In addition, the genetic differentiation among subspecies was assessed using nuclear 28S rRNA gene sequences. The body size of subspecies toyamensis is smaller than that of the other subspecies; mean body size tended to increase towards the northeast. Ovipositor length and width are smaller in subspecies toyamensis than in the other subspecies. Although these dimensions depend on body size, ovipositor length still differed significantly between toyamensis and constricticollis-babai after the effect of body size was removed. Multiple regression analyses revealed that body size and ovipositor size are significantly correlated with the depth of snow, but not temperature or rainfall; sizes were larger in places where the snowfall was greatest.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Gulf of Finland-1
    Template for Submission of Information, including Traditional Knowledge, to Describe Areas Meeting Scientific Criteria for Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas EASTERN GULF OF FINLAND Abstract The area is a shallow (mean 24 m, max 95 m deep) archipelago area in the northeastern Baltic Sea. It is characterized by hundreds of small islands and skerries, coastal lagoons and boreal narrow inlets, as well as a specific geomorphology, with clear signs from the last glaciation. Due to the low salinity (0- 5 permille), the species composition is a mixture of freshwater and marine organisms, and especially diversity of aquatic plants is high, Many marine species, including habitat forming key species such as bladderwrack (Fucus vesiculosus) and blue mussel (Mytilus trossulus), live on the edge of their geographical distribution limits, which makes them vulnerable to human disturbance and effects of climate change. The area has a rich birdlife and supports one of the most important populations of the ringed seal (Pusa hispida botnica), an endangered species. Introduction to the area The proposed area (Fig. 1 & 2) is situated on the north-eastern part of the Gulf of Finland, in the Baltic Sea, which is the largest brackish water area in the World. The proposed area is an archipelago with hundreds of small islands and skerries, coastal lagoons and boreal narrow inlets, as well as a specific geomorphology, with clear signs from the last glaciation (ca. 18.000 – 9.000 BP). Coastal areas freeze over still freeze over every winter for at least a few weeks. The scenery in the area ranges from sheltered inner archipelago with lagoons, shallow bays and boreal inlets, through middle archipelago, with few larger islands, to wave exposed outer archipelago with open sea, small islands and skerries.
    [Show full text]
  • Actinobacteria and the Vitamin Metabolism of Firebugs
    Actinobacteria and the Vitamin Metabolism of Firebugs - Characterizing a mutualism's specificity and functional importance - Seit 1558 Dissertation To Fulfill the Requirements for the Degree of „Doctor of Philosophy“ (PhD) Submitted to the Council of the Faculty of Biology and Pharmacy of the Friedrich Schiller University Jena by M.S. Hassan Salem Born on 16.01.1986 in Cairo, Egypt i Das Promotionsgesuch wurde eingereicht und bewilligt am: Gutachter: 1) 2) 3) Das Promotionskolloquium wurde abgelegt am: ii To Nagla and Samy, for ensuring that life’s possibilities remain endless To Aly, for sharing everything* And to Aileen, my beloved HERC2 mutant * Everything except our first Gameboy (circa 1993). For all else, I am profoundly grateful. i ii CONTENTS LIST OF PUBLICATIONS ................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1: SYMBIOSIS AND THE EVOLUTION OF BIOLOGICAL NOVELTY IN INSECTS ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 The organism in the age of the holobiont: It, itself, they .................................................. 3 1.2 Adaptive significance of symbiosis .................................................................................. 4 1.3 Symbiont-mediated diversification ................................................................................... 5 1.4 Revisiting Darwin’s mystery of mysteries: The role of symbiosis in species formation 6 1.5 Homeostasis of symbioses
    [Show full text]