David Mellor Design Ltd the Round Building Leadmill Hathersage

NPIDODI0804I0863 RECEIVED ~~G32I::=78~/-::380838=~---I~----~ ...-.;;...;..------AT A ~------0110112004

Ud ATPDNPA 1110Il2OO4

CI!R1'I'ICATE Til QlIIO 17M17S1 A

APPLICAtION

LAIT ADVERT DATE 1810712004 874 DATE SENT DATI REPLY 11108t2OO4 11lO8l2OO4 11!06J2004 -z--z..h DEEM!D D#l

13 DATE 1Ml812OO4

rf 0 SEP 2884 =-- --=--=---

ENFORCEMENT RECORD CARD

This card should be filed immediately in front ofthe decision notice which in tum should be in front of a set of approved plans.

INPI NP/DDD/O G0 l~ / 653

The following amendments have been formally agreed by the planning officer since the issue of the decision notice:

DATE DETAILS •

The following conditions have been formally complied with since the issue of I. the decision notice: DATE COND.NO. DETAILS SITE VISIT RECORD

DATE INSP PROGRESS DEPARTURES

KEY DATES TO NOTE KEY FACTORS TO WATCH

DATE DETAILS DETAILS

-I PLANNING DECISION NOTICE Tel: 01629 816200 Fax: 01629 816310 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.peakdistrict.org Minicom: 01629 816319 ,-- ...... ''''-'"- Aldero House. Baslow Road. Bakewell. Derbyshire. DE4S IAE NATlONAI. PARK AUTHORITY- To: Carin Mellor cIa P.2843 Hopkin Architects 27 Broadley Terrace London NW16LG

THIS NOTICE RELATES TO PLANNING CONTROL ONLY, ANY OTHER STATUTORY CONSENT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY

TOWN & COUNTRY PLANNING ACTS & GENERAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER

In pursuance of the powers vested in the Peak District National Park Authority under the above Acts and Order, and with reference to your application for Full Planning Permission, details of which are as follows:

Office Code No. NPIDDD/0604/0653 • Date received: 09 June 2004 Proposal: Erection of visitor centre to house exhibition Location: David Mellor Design Ltd The Round BUilding Leadmill Hathersage

Parish: Hathersage

THE DECISION

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT PERMISSION FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT in the manner described on the application and shown on the accompanying plans and drawings is

GRANTED SUbject to the following conditions:

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun within 5 years from the date of this permission.

2 The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out otherwise than in complete accordance with the following plans:

(i) A-DMC-SP001 (Location Plan) (Ii) A-DMC-SP003 (Proposed Block Plan) (iii) A-DMC-L001 (Ground Floor Plan) (iv) A-DMC-X001 Revision 01 '(Section and Gable Elevations), and, (v) A-DMC-E001 Revision 02 (South West (Front) Elevation

subject to the following conditions or modifications.

Continued overleaf.

Signed Date 10 SEP 2001 - =~------.=.:::..:'-'-,,--- 4... Attention Is called to the notes at the end of this Decision Notice

Form TCP3 NPIDDD/0604/0653 P.2843

3 Within 14 days of the development, hereby approved, commencing details shall be submitted to and, if acceptable, approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority, of the North East (back) elevation of the building.

4 Within 14 days of the development, hereby approved, commencing details of all the external materials to be used to construct the bUilding, including the precise colour of those areas to be painted, shall be submitted to and, if acceptable, approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The agreed materials shall then be used to construct the building.

5 Within 14 days of the development, hereby approved, commencing precise details of the internal layout of the building identifying clearly the area of the bUilding that will be used specifically for the sale of refreshments, shall be submitted to and, if acceptable, approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Thereafter, the building shall be specifically laid out in accordance with the agreed details and the building shall then be used as such unless written variation to any alteration has been granted by the Local Planning Authority.

6 The building hereby approved shall be used solely for the purposes indicated on the approved , drawings and in a manner ancillary to the primary use of the site for the manufacture of cutlery. It shall not be let or otherwise used.

7 The 4.5 metre by maximum achievable visibility sightlines across the site frontage shall be maintained free of any obstruction to visibility greater than 1 metre in height relative to the nearside carriageway channel level.

8 The first 5 metres back from the access entrance to the site shall be surfaced in a solid bound material before the new building, hereby approved, is first used. The area shall then be maintained as such thereafter. .. 9 The on site parking and manoeuvring areas shown on the approved plans shall be maintained available for the parking and manoeuvring of vehicles at all times.

Reasons for Conditions:

1 To comply with Sections 91, 92, and 93 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (which requires the National Park Authority to reconsider the proposal afresh after a period of years).

2 For clarity and for the avoidance of doubt. 3 For clarity and for the avoidance of doubt and as no details of this element of the proposal have o been submitted.

4 In the interests of the character and the appearance of the development.

5 For clarity and for the avoidance of dOUbt and to ensure that the Local Planning Authority retains control over the extent of the uses proposed to take place within the building.

6 For clarity and for the avoidance of dOUbt and to ensure the building is not operated independently of the main use of the site.

7-9 In the interests of highway safety.

Footnotes

To comply with condition 7 above the vegetation either side of the access point will need to be cut back and maintained as such thereafter. This may mean that the entrance signs need to be relocated and advertisement consent may be required for this action. You are, therefore, advised to contact the Local Planning Authority for specific advice on that matter.

Continued overleaf. \ ~-

NPIDDD/0604/0653 P.2843

Pursuant to current highway legislation, the applicant shall contact the District Highway Care Manager, North West Area, prior to commencing any works within or adjacent to the existing public highway limits (Tel: 01629 580000).

Note: This application was determined taking into account the policies listed below. As required by S54a of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, applications which accord with Development Plan policies should be approved unless material planning considerations indicate otherwise. In this case, it was considered there were no overriding material considerations.

Relevant Structure Plan policies include: GS1, C2, RT1.

Relevant Local Plan policies include: LC4, LR1 •

., ·._- - ...-.,

STATEMENT OF APPLICANTS RIGHTS ARISING FROM THE REFUSAL OF PLANNING PERMISSION OR FROM THE GRANT OF PERMISSION SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS

Appeals to the Secretary of State If you are aggrieved by the decision of your local planning authority to refuse permission for the proposed development or to grant it subject to conditions, then you can appeal to the Secretary of State for the Environment under Section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. If you want to appeal, then you must do so within 3 months of the date of this notice, using a form which you can get from the Planning Inspectorate at Customer Support Unit, Temple Quay House, 2 The Square, Temple Quay, Bristol BS1 6PN, telephone No. 0117 372 8000 or www.planning inspectorate.gov.uk . The Secretary of State can allow a longer period for giving notice of an appeal, but he will not normally be prepared to use this power unless there are special circumstances which excuse the delay in giving notice of appeal. The Secretary of State need not consider an appeal if it seems to him that the local planning authority could not have granted planning permission for the proposed development or could not have granted it without the conditions they imposed, having regard io the statutory requirements, to • the proVisions of any development order and to any directions given under a development order. In practice, the Secretary of State does not refuse to consider appeals solely because the local "" planning authority based its decision on a direction given by him. Purchase Notices If either the local planning authority or the Secretary of State for the Environment refuses permission to develop land or grants it SUbject to conditions, the owner may claim that he can neither put the land to a reasonably beneficial use in its existing state nor render the land capable of a reasonably beneficial use by the carrying out of any development which has been or would be permitted. In these circumstances, the' owner may serve a purchase notice on the Council (District Council, London Borough Council or Common Council of the City of London) or, where the land is situated in a National Park, the National Park Authority for that Park in whose area the land is situated. This notice will require the Councilor Authority to purchase his interest in the land in accordance with the proVisions of Part VI of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

Q - Delegated Item Report NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY

~Pl€larn.n[!nllin~C~a~s!!lelJO:l1fftg·~;.ft.K P-File No: 2843 Authorised By: NP Number: 000/0604/653 Oate of Report: ptember 2004

Structure Plan Cddes: GS1, C2, RT1,

Local Plan Codes: LC4, LR1

List of Background Papers (Not Previously Published): NIL

Human Rights: Any Human Rights issues have been considered and addressed in the • preparation of this report.

Report:

The applicant seeks consent to erect a new structure that would link two existing buildings together across an area of loose chippings currently used as car parking. The building would be primarily to provide a site for an exhibition hall to provide a permanent home for exhibits reflecting the work of the site owner, David Mellor. In addition, the building would provide for the serving of light refreshments.

The design of the building has been modified during the life of the application. Originally it was proposed of a slate roof with the glass structure underneath. However, following discussions with the Authority's architect the design has • been amended to replicate the pitch and materials of the roof of the main Round Building that is the focus of the site. This is now considered to be acceptable.

The site is currently used for a variety of purposes but primarily for the manufacture of cutlery. Evidence submitted with the application demonstrates that the site continues to operate at profitable levels. In addition, there is an area used for offices and additional space used for the storage of manufactured material. There is also a factory shop on the site and a large area for the parking of vehicles.

The site is located within Recreation Zone 2 wherein planning policies allow for informal recreation. However, this site already caters for members of the public either visiting the existing factory or the adjoining shop. In addition, it is backed onto by the Hathersage Park development where many forms of recreational and other uses are carrying on. Therefore, It is considered that the provision of the exhibition area and the small cafe is in accord with planning policy.

The bUilding would be located to the rear of the existing building that dominates the site, i.e. the Round Building. As such, the provision of this additional building will not adversely affect the character of the area. There are no near neighbours to the site and so there would be no adverse impact on the amenity of neighbours.

The Highway Authority are not concerned about the development from a highway safety point of view.

The comments of the Parish Council are noted. However, they are generally supportive of the scheme. However, in particular the car park is not to be moved and so the comments of the PC on this matter are not relevant to the • consideration of the application.

District Council: No objections. Highway Authority: No objections subject to conditions. Parish Council: Recommend approval.

Recommendation: Grant permission subject to conditions.

• PMK DISTRICT NAT' Adrian Kirkham ')",TE REC'D" .\,.~ 200 ,~ ...., I "t Senior Planning Officer (North Area) ' Peak District National Park Authority . ·""OC!\TED· . ~ Aldern House ~':'(NOWl.. ~v Baslow Road 1 CL I ·'.'\.Y: n", I Bakewell ~·')..;. .Atl('\~". - Derbyshire L':. '" fz$Lf--.3 DE451AE _._-,.-.. .

20th August 2004 Re: The David Mellor New Visitor Centre Planning Application

• Dear Adrian, Further to your advice received by telephone, we have reviewed the pitch of the proposed roof to the new visitor centre roof.

We agree that reducing the pitch of the roof incline to reflect that of the factory building offers an appropriate architectural solution for the site, and that the building sits well between the existing buildings. 27 Broadley Terrace London NW1 6LG Drawings DMC_XOO 1, which shows a section and end elevation, and T02077241751 DMC_E001 showing the front elevation have been revised to show the new F 020 7723 0932 roof. E [email protected] www.hopkins.co.uk These drawings are issued here under IN 004. Chairmen Sir Michael Hopkins We trust that these revisions meet with your approval. Lady Hopkins Don't hesitate to contact us should you require and further information. Managing Director William Taylor

Directors Yours sincerely, David Selby • James Greaves Andrew Barnett Pamela Bate Simon Fraser Michael Taylor Edward Williams Ernest Fasanya Tom Holdom Patrick Nee Chris Bannister Hopkins Architects Jonathan Knight

cc. Financial Director Henry Buxton Corin Mellor DMD Project Directors Arif Mehmood Jan Mackie Peter Mouncey Laura Carrara-Cagni Gary Clark Julie Gaulter Tom Heidorn Ken Hood Tim Sloan

Hopkins Architects Ltd Registered in England and Wales No 3241431 Hopkins Architects Limited Job reference 27 Broadley Terrace. London NWl 6LG Tel: 020 7 7241751 Fax: 02077237393

Works: New Visitors Centre Situated at The Round Building Hathersage Sheffield S32 1BA Purpose Of Issue Planning

Client: David Mellor The Round Building Date Of Issue 20.8.2004 Hathersage Sheffield 532 1BA Package

~ Reduced roof pitch

Architect's Comments Drawings revised in response to advice from planners.

• Distribution

1 Peak District Planning 1 Corin Mellor· David Mellor 1 Mike Cook· Bure Happold

Drawing No Rev Title Scale

A DMC EOOl 02 North East (Front) Elevation 1:100 A DMC XOOl 01 Section and Gable Elevation 1:50 •

Issued lor and on behalf 01 Hopkins Architects Limited. Page I:!.:J 01 I:!.:J '_ ~ " Hopkins Architects lid. Registered In England number 324~431 RegIStered address: 49a Downshlre HJlJ London NW31NX L_,.-----

,, i KEY: J"\

<:"., ®.' Pair.Jed Mild S~le'e"\9ark grey)

:!-'\.i@ Tlfl;lber (pilCh pine) \\ li':;'rC':/ Glass , '(::V ~_ ~~ lead roof f /; ® York Stone ...... "-.. ',oJ ( '/-. ),.j ,-~ '. ,/ L •.1"'. l ",co"., Rendered wall 10

)

'-..{ J

. /j .. '

~.,

":::. ··----11--- - ,--- , . I'-····!!- 11'- '····1!---11--1-11 •• • ••••••• •••• It

, i ) ..,(.

EXisting Retort Building Un' New VlSllor Centre Uo' Existing Shop Building

Date Ret. Revision Project David Mellor - New Visitor Centre Project Reference DMC 02.06.04 00 Issued for planning. IN001 08.06.04 01 Shadow gap added In render. Issued for planning. IN002 SUbject South West (Front) elevation Drawing Number A DMC E001 20.08.04 02 roof pitch reduced to match factory building, glazing extended to ground levellNOO Scale 1 : 100 I Dale 25.05.04 Revision 02

Architects Hopkins Architects Ltd. 27 Broadley Terrace London NW1 6tG t: 020 7724 1751 e: mall hopklns.co.uk

@ COPWrlght Hopkins Architects ltd. Do Not Scale. Use Figured Dimensions Onlw. All Dimensions to be ch&cked On site. Original Drawing Size A3 III Registered Offlce: Hopkins Architects Ltd. Registered in Englsnd number: 324131 Registered address: 49a Downshire Hilll..:0ndon NW3 1NX • KEY: o Painted Mild Steelldark grey) ® Timber (pitch pine) @ Glass / ® Lead roof , ® York Stone ® Rendered wall to match rear of existing building

r------.- ~~~~~'

""" D .-,--' --,,"'- ._------' ,//

'IE,------;.--{ C F}----+_ ~ existing gas meter -,,-;>, \, drainage 1hannel

'------'------{ B Section (Retort Building beyond)

Jl.

~ .. ------.. ,--._._----~ . A )----?:J::::=:t;:::;:===:::~======--:;:--·=----=----·~·--~--·=::L.:.:=H---( A

F }---t-----+-

B ® E existing gas matar ~

dralnoga channel

Gable elevation (Retort Building beyond)

Dale Revision Project David Mellor • New Visitor Centre Project Reference WEL 02.06.04 Issued fer planning INOO 20.08.04 roof pitch revised Drawing Issued lor planning INOO Subject Section and Gable elevation Number A DMC X001 Scale 1:50 I Date 25.05.04 Revision 01

Architects Hopkins Architects 27 Broadla!r' Terroce London NWl .LO t: 020 7724 1751 a: mlill hopkins.co.uk ___ ------':OTCl:iidcr~ :N011V':)O,1'i 311~ :",.]3<:' 'f~",,~;~"'f"()"''ll:W \ '-:",_,:.:~ (1':')',.:)0-,1\1 \

~nnl 90V £ t (j,}:;\l 31'>'0\ ~~\!I~O\J.\!N 1~iGW';:J

., ...... , . Kirkham Adrian

From: Kirkham Adrian Sent: 02 August 200413:33 To: SUbject: The Round BUilding

Tom,

Hope you are having a fUlfilling break and that all is going well.

Regarding the application for the display building at Carin's site I have had the chance to take advice from colleagues on the design of the building and particularly my concerns over the roof. This has also given the chance to have a look at the scheme with fresh eyes.

Rather than the traditional approach I suggested it has been suggested to me that the new building should not compete with the buildings either side of it. This seems of some merit and, to that effect, it seems to me that the new building should have a either a flat roof (or a very slight pitch to allow for water drain off) or a roof that takes the pitch of the feature building of the site, Le. the Round Building itself. I do not have a strong preference either way and would welcome your thoughts on that point.

Carin and I also talked about clarifying the reason why there are different numbers of car parking shown on the ...existing and proposed car parking layouts despite the same numbers of spaces being shown. In addition, he is going let me have some reasoning justifying the continued operation of the shop as such in view of the comments that we .0have received about the viability of the site.

I look forward to hearing from you on these points.

Adrian

Qt...J'C' ' ~ ~q"'" ~ ·0· ~ GO c t.ea '

):+t« 0

t·~o"'" •

1 File Note: NPIDDD/0604/0653 and 0667.

Discussion with Corin Mellor, applicant, concerning the two applications.

Outlined initially to Corin that I had been trying to contact his agent to discuss the matters outstanding.

We discussed the exhibition building initially. I noted that I had previously had concerns about the roofon the building.

However, following discussions with colleagues I considered that in order to address these concerns a flat roof(slightly angled to avoid water build up or a roofofroughly the same pitch as the "Round Building" would be a suitable solution to the roof problem as this would mean that the new building would not be competing with the adjoining buildings, it would pick up a detail ofthe main building on the site and it would mean that the modernistic feel ofthe building was carried through. In addition, it would allow retention ofthe eaves overhanging the outside ofthe building.

Corin said he welcomed the suggestion and that he would talk to his architect about • this matter and come back to me. I also asked for clarification on the level ofcar parking in the vicinity ofthe site and to identify why there was a different number ofspaces shown on the proposed and the existing scheme.

On the matter ofthe shop I noted that we had received comments from the Parish that, whilst they were generally supportive, had raised some concerns about the ongoing viability ofthe business that operated from the site. I asked that it would be helpful to have non commercially sensitive information that would allow officers to refute these allegations ifthe business was indeed flourishing. He said he would let me have some information.

] • Adrian Kirkham 28th July 2004. Derbyshire, ''::ILEe AllOCATION: I DE451AE. -I COPIEl":..:',,:::0_'------...; Pexstr:;I~ Dear Sirs, , ESPONSES FROM DERBYSHIRE DALES DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSULTATION R _ . ., 0 be recommended for approval subject to no overriding The following. applications are~. hway Authority. For the avoidance of doubt, whilst the objections bel~g raised by th~. If to amendments to design or materials, or conditions District Council would not 0 Jechereappropriate it would not support a refusal on design regarding landscaping matters w.. ',,' ' •__ -' • ,~ ..." fnr th.. ",nnlicallons IisLd. -- - (?Ec:z-_.l \J~::'l~) [':'\~(aF

NP/DDD/0604/653 Erection of visitor centre to house exhibition - The Round Building, (Hathersage) Leadmill - Corin Mellor.

NP/DDD/0604/663 Two storey rear extension to dwelling - Ivy House Farm, (Birchover) Uppertown, Birchover - Mr. R. Tabemer.

NPIDDD/0604/664 Two storey extension to kitchen and bathroom - 4 The Meadows, (Great Longstone) Grisedale Road, Great Longstone - Mr. & Mrs. N. Stephenson.

, NP/DDD/0604/665 Proposed rear extension - Meadow Hey, Burton Close Drive, (Bakewell) Haddon Road, Bakewell - Mr. & Mrs. R. Nash.

NPIDDD/0604/671 Rural sewage treatment works - Cressbrook Sewage Treatment (Litton) Works, Cressbrook - Severn Trent Water Ltd.

NP/DDD/0604/672 Realignment of roof forming part' of Thomeycroft House, (Youlgreave) Thorneycroft House, Bradford, Youlgrave - Mr. R. Stacey.

NP/DDD/0604/674 New garage/bam and extension - Bridge House, Netherside, (Bradwell) Bradwell, Hope Valley S33 9JL - Mr. & Mrs. De La Billiere.

NP/DDD/0604/675 Conversion of storage barn to holiday cottage - SI. Anns, Windmill (Little Hucklow) Mr. R. White.

NP/DDD/0604/676 Two storey extension to side of property, single storey extension at , (Bradwell) rear and erection of front porch - 20 Michlow Drive, Bradwell - Mrs. J. Pemberton.

NPIDDD/0604/679 Conversion of part of dwelling to shop retail area - Bridgeway, (Bakewell) Bridge Street, Bakewell - Mr. Longland.

NPIDDD/0604/680 Listed Building Consent - Conversion of part of dwelling to shop (Bakewell) retail area - Bridgeway, Bridge Street, Bakewell - Mr. Longland.

NPIDDD/0604/685 Application for change of use from B1 to 01 - Block Two, (Hathersage) Hathersage Park, Hathersage - Nordeer UK Ltd.

NPIDDD/0604/687 Demolition of garage and erection of ancillary accommodation (Taddington & Holly House, Humphrey Gate, Taddington - Mrs. J. Cretney. Priestcliffe) I f 'R( _ ..,csre:.. 5 ~ ~ Page lof3 f.d2R\3fAC Hathersage Parish Council Planning Committee Meeting of 12 July, 7.00 Parish Rooms Present: Grahame Brown, Chris Cartledge, Peter Mander, Heather Rodgers

NPIDDD/0504/0619 Proposed !Jffice space associated with residence. Riverside, Baulk Lane, Hathersage

Recommendation: refusal

This is a new building, the size ofa small house, significantly increasing the size ofthe property, and adding to a number ofalready existing out buildings. The development would not be generally I visible except in winter when the trees are bare. The physical design itselfis not objectional. The loss ofglazed area on the main house itselfis not a problem.

Recently there was an application at Leverett Croft to convert an existing barn to an office. The application was rejected because it was an office development outside the village not directly connected with agriculture. We believe that similar considerations apply here. A large new office in a garden at this location is not acceptable. .

We note further that there is existing vacant office space elsewhere in the village, at Hathersage Park, and potential office space at Hall Farm where planning permission has already been granted. There is not a strong need for this development.

We note with regret that building work already appears to have started.

I!NPIDD/0604/0653 I Erection ofvisitor centre to house exhibition David Mellor Ltd, The Round House, Hathersage

NPIDD/0604/06667 Change of use to retail sales David Mellor Ltd, The Round House, Hathersage

Recommendation: acceptance (with reservations noted below)

These two application were taken together.

We note that the shop has in effect been a retail sales outlet rather than a factory shop for a number ofyears. Indeed we are concerned at the apparent low level ofactivity in the adjacent Roundhouse and wonder ifit is still operating as a viable cutlery works. There must be a query as to whether a need can be shown for a new building on this site in view ofthe current level ofmanufacturing activity. We would want to be reassured about the continuation ofcutlery manufacture at the site.

file:IIC:\Documents%20and%20Settings\mac\Local%20Settings\Temporary%20Inter... 14/07/2004 •. Page 2 of3 -- i' \ The design ofthe building itselfis acceptable and in keeping with the other building on the site. We note that it is in effect an increase in retail space. The development should increase the viability of the operation ofthe business as a whole and would create some employment. It was not felt that it would detract from other enterprises in the <;entre ofthe village.

An increase in activity at the site should not cause any real traffic issues. We note that the moved car park might need additional planting to screen it from the road. We also query whether any mature trees would have to be felled to clear the space.

NPID00/0604/0865 Change of use from B1 to 01 Block 2, Hathersage Park

Recommendation: refusal

The Evelyn Medical Centre at Hope has an urgent and strong need for a new branch surgery. Hathersage Parish Council has been in discussion with the doctors about suitable locations. Although there are problems with the site at Hathersage Park, we have supported a move there, at least on a I temporary basis, in the absence somewhere better. Notedproblems include"that Hathersage Park is .", outside the centre ofthe village, there is limited parking, pedestrian access along Station Road is narrow and poor and vehicular access to the side itselfis not good. These Hathersage Park units were not designed for the volume ofpublic use that would be generated by a doctor's surgery. Already one unit, with Hathersage Council recommendation for approval, has been converted to a gymn.

The committee was surprised and dismayed to find that the plans submitted covered not only provision on the ground floor for the surgery but also about two and a halftimes that area on the first floor for professions allied to medicine. These additional changes have not been discussed with the Parish Council. We take the view that this would be an increase in public pressure on the site which would not be acceptable. There is not enough parking. It would become a significant out ofcentre facility, effectively an out ofvillage retail development. It was further noted that less suitable first, floor units are proposed for public facing services, while ground units remain free. The strong needs case associated with the surgery cannot be made for the first floor development. There were concerns about accessibility to the first floor (though the provision ofa stair lift was noted). It would suck traffic and people from the village centre. There is inadequate parking.

Consultation between a number ofparties is continuing, about the best location long term for a surgery. There is a strong feeling that there are better possibilities, but none could be made available quickly. In the meantime, on a temporary basis, we would accept an application covering the surgery only, possibly on a time limited basis ifthis is feasible. However we feel we cannot recommend acceptance ofthis proposal as it stands.

NPID00/0504/0568 Erection ofa Conservatory Rimika, Besom Lane, Hathersage

Recommendation: acceptance

The conservatory would not be generally visible. It does not impinge on adjacent property and is not oversize. It was felt that there are better materials the PVC but that brown would be acceptable.

Chris Cartledge

13 July 2004

file://C:\Documentso/020and%20Settings\mac\Local%20Settings\TempmaryU,20Inter... David Harvey I~ ~ Director of Environmental Services DERBYSHIRE County Hall County Council Matlock Improving life for local people Derbyshire DE4 3AG

Mr J Dixon Telephone (01629) 580000 National Park Officer Extension Peak District Nation",1 O~rL- 1'" c" . Ask for Ian Turkington Aidern House ijNj OISlRICINAjjONAi pARK Ai1TjlOB!I1 Our ref NWDIIT/JP/29247 Baslow Road DATE REC'O 12 JUL ZOO4 Your ref NP/DDD/0604/653 Bakewell ~ L . Date 8 July 2004 Derbyshire A~~OCATEO: g~~~~R y ACKNOW~EOGEMENT: REP~Y: FILE ALLOCATION: Dear Mr Dixon I.SC:s:OP~t!!:E~0l:TO!:!:: ----,

New Visitor Centre to House Exhibition of David Mellor Designs and House Small Cafe Serving Light Refreshments - The Round BUilding, Hathersage

I refer to the above application, details of which were forwarded to this Authority on 21 June 2004 for highway comment.

The Highway Authority has previously accepted the principle of development on this site and despite the access being on the inside of a bend on a derestricted section of highway and having a system of solid white line carriageway markings, it was demonstrated at the time, the access would be acceptable from a highway viewpoint - subject to maintaining the frontage vegetation to safeguard the maximum achievable visibility splays in each direction. This would appear to have been maintained to some degree, however, some of the vegetation behind the boundary hedge is now , somewhat overgrown and infringes the conditioned visibility splay envelope, this should be trimmed back to achieve the level of visibility previously sought. I also note from my files that the Highway Authority has previously highlighted, as far back as 1994, that the free-standing signs either side of the access interfere with the emerging visibility sightlines and from my visit to site this would still appear to be the case. These will need to be relocated outside the visibility splay envelope or be restricted in height to no more than 1m.

I also note the Highway Authority has not raised objection in principle to subsequent development on this site and it is considered the creation of a new building to house an existing exhibition and small cafe is unlikely to have a significant effect on the level of vehicular activity attracted to the site and merely enhances or improves the operations already carried out at present. The building scale is limited and it is located on an area currently used for car parking. However it would appear from the room available within the site, be

www.derbyshire.gov.uk Minicom (01629) 585400 Facsimile (01629) 585119 r') a-mail [email protected],uk This letter is produced on re-cycled paper. Derbyshire County Council cares for the environment. t~'" L',;VESTOR I:'< PEOPLE PL 1 03/04 ,"!.

rl3{'H.1liU~~'~:s~;riGl~iQ;03j~

1 !nos lUl ~ r 3 :JJlI ~1"'('; I ~'." I QUt );.,1 I. ")(\ I)A I .n:;n:~0 ' , fl.'\ ~\~ \;']'1;/\1"; . ·';"i:'; "1 :""I'll 1 .lJI~4;);) J iA ?,il' I l-_. .;:;O::.!.'l 2~~:'j

o -2- Mr J Dixon NWD/IT/JP/29247 8 JUly 2004

possible to reallocate and maintain the existing level of parking. Whilst the proposed plan still indicates 18 spaces, it is considered any shortfall there may be in this respect, would certainly be accommodated within the site itself and would be unlikely to be displaced onto the highway.

Therefore, providing the proposals are acceptable from a planning aspect, the Highway Authority would not wish to raise objection in principle to the development proposals, subject to the above comments and I would recommend the following conditions be appended to any consent in the interests of highway safety:-

, 1) The 4.5m x maximum achievable visibility sightlines across the entire site frontage shall be cut back and maintained free from any obstructions to visibility greater than 1m high relative to the nearside carriageway channel level for the life of the development.

2) The initial 5m of the access shall be surfaced in a solid bound material prior to the expanded visitor centre being taken into use.

3) On-site parking and manoeuvring space shall be maintained generally as per the application drawings for the life of the development.

In addition to the above conditions, I would also recommend, in line with the previous consent to allow sale of merchandise on site (NPIWED/1194/523), that any consent be allied to existing operations on site (conditions 1 and 2 of , the aforementioned consent and/or any sUbsequent renewal consent). I would also suggest the following note be 'appended to any consent to assist the applicant:-

a) To comply with the stated Visibility criteria (my condition 1 above) the vegetation either side of the access (generally behind the boundary hedge) will need to be cut back and maintained and the entrance signs relocated behind the visibility envelope or lowered to a height not exceeding 1m relative to the nearside carriageway edge.

flU!( pAlerN&ici'i PARK AUTH9RIJl DAn AIC'l) 12 JUL 200~ AbbOCATIlD: GROUP OFFICER ACI

b) Pursuant to current highway legislation, the applicant shall contact the District Highway Care Manager. North West Area, prior to commencing any works within or adjacent the existing public highway limits (telephone 01629 580000).

Yours sincerely

, Graham Hill II Area Develop n Manager - North Western

H:\H5\W1\JP604.doc

jB/(AUTHORIlY OATERE I : JUl 200' ALLor' . ., ·.ER ACJ( REI .dEH'r. FlU COF t ... ,~ Tel: 01629 816200 Fax: 01629 816310 , E~mail: [email protected] Web: www.peakdistricLorg Minicom: 01629 816319 Aldem House, B.slow Road, Bakewell, Derbyshire, DE45 lAE NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY-

Hathersage Parish Council Our Ref: PI 2843 Parish Rooms Date: 14 June 2004 Main Road Please Ask For. The DC Officer Hathersage HOPE VALLEY Derbyshire S321BB

Dear Sir/Madam

Application Code Number: NP/DDD/0604/0653 Erection of visitor centre to house exhibition David Mellor Design Ltd The Round Building Leadmill Hathersage

I enclose one copy of the above application.

You should retum one copy of this letter containing your observations and comments to this office within 28 days. A further copy of this letter containing your observations should be forwarded to:

Derbyshire Dales District Council Town Hall Bank Road Matlock Derbyshire DE43NN

The Authority currently operates a procedure that allows individuals or, ., meetings of the committee or sub-committees. Details of this procedure can Ib !il tiilneil' at the National Park Office. I )" _. "'E '''0 ,.. It" l. 22 JUL 2004 Yours faithfully , "lLLOC'fF,[)' GROU!" OFr-ICER ,\C~ ~'O'-VLEDGEM£:NT:

JW Davies FILE IILLOCATION: • Head of Development Control COPIED TO: Parish Council I TO~RecommendatiOn and any Co~ments:- ~ "" c...o"..

Signed ~~ In any correspondence. please guote our reference and the Application Code Number. ; ~ > Member ofthe Association ojNational Park Authorities Holder of Council oj Europe Diploma :~:

Chief Executive: Jim Dixon Directors: Conservation &. Developmenl:john Lomas Corporate Resources &" Monitoring Officer: Ruth Marchington Directors; Recreation &£ Education: John Thompson National Projects: Ken Parker Chief Finance Officer. Peter Swaby Working together to care for a liVing landscape for everyone · ---~_._.~==:=:...... _-=-=----==-- ._- -- Notice of Planning Proposal NATlONAL PARK ALTt-1( )!~l"f

AN APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE BY: Corin Mellor

FOR: Erection of visitor centre to house exhibition

AT: David Mellor Design Ltd The Round Building Leadmill Hathersage

PARISH: Hathersage

REASONS FOR ADVERT: Standard Site Notice

OFFICE CODE NO : NP/DDD/0604/0653 P FILE NO: 2843

ADVERT START DATE: 25/06/2004

COMMENTS TO BE RECEIVED BY : 16/07/2004

A copy of the application and the plans may be inspected during office hours for the next 21 days following the date of this notice at the National Park Authority Office.

A copy has also been sent to the District 1 Borough council and parish council 1 meeting for comment. If you wish to make any comments please write to the National Park Authority Office before the expiry date, please note the authority now permits members of the p,ublic and consultees to address its committees, including those which determine planning applications. Please contact Committee Services if you require details.

01629816200 Chief Executive Tel: 01629816310 Peak District National Park Fax: [email protected] Authority Email: www.peakdistrict-npa.gov.uk Aldern House, www: Baslow Road, Bakewell Derbyshire DE451AE DERBYSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL HIQHWAYS COMMENTS

APPLICATION CODE N°· . . DATE: 17 0L..().<2.. 0+

~\-e.o -=-\- ~\~I'" p\.e;-.~ ~ ~~c..o~0· sl 17/6 ?

• ~:;;?~~<+(oc:>s~~~~~~ ·-':~~~~;~A-~.• FWi·~_.~_;~,1:;r~s.;t·~~.;~~;;~~~§~~~~.,.Jr.'Ji;~~'!c:.· ..~~·.~_;G;_·.i_;:1i._-,;.:.\.~:.;~_t,.·_._-,;_:_t_··~Q~,~r~-., " • L. ~ ',.. _ "~!';"-;~'?..:.. "~'.. '-',", " ," ~',,,, ;'1'3~.- :.. ,,,~,~,.,'{1,~ .,..~. ." ,~. "r.;" , ." •.. ," .0.··· t; ····i~··

~~-, A1If NP/ODD/:) , j, " -- D • /633 •

• ,-. - ,~ ! •

FAa Tom Holdom Your ref: Hopkins Architects 27 Broadley Terrace Our ref: DC1.21KZ1 London NW16LG Date: 09/06/2004

Dear Sir • Re: New visitor centre at The Round Building, Hathersage

Unfortunately, the information supplied is not adequate for proper consideration of the application' and I am therefore requesting the following from you.

Please provide a further 3 copies of the planning application form. Please provide 4 copies of a drawing showing the east elevation drawn to a scale of 1:50. Please provide an additional £220.00, we have calculated the site area as shown in red on the proposed block plan and the site area is 198 sqm which incurs a fee of £660.00 in total.

• Yours faithfully

Karen Zubertowski Administration Officer Development Control

*Under Article 4 of the Town and Country Planning (Applications) Regulations 1988, the Peak District National Park. Authority, as a local planning authority, is entitled to ask for such drawings and other information as are necessary for the determination of an application. NPIDDDIO 604 / 653

~ r

1n ~. r- .'" CS"\ (.:0.....

~ .:::t::P c' •• 4.c.. .'g • ><2/ I --Y

( ~ :;t.. • A'c' . '''-- . e... Q ..~ ~ E,..' c

~ ~ c-'oc-J...

f\=t ...-<....- • III tJ =:CI) '5

8'" June 2004 Re: The David Mellor New Visitor Centre Planning Application

Dear Adrian,

Further to our telephone conversation this morning please find revised Design Statement which expands on our reasoning behind using timber on the gable ends of the Visitor Centre.

We have also enclosed here drawing A_DMC_E002 rev 01, which has been revised to show vertical shadow gaps within the render, and '27 Broadley Terrace London NWl 6LG A_DMC_SP001 rev 01 as there was an error on the property boundary on T 020 77241751 the previous revision. F 020 7723 0932 E [email protected] www.hopkins.co.uk Also, as discussed, the title of drawing A_DMC_E001 is given as, " North East (front) elevation", this is obviously incorrect. Could you please cross out Chairmen Sir Michael Hopkins the "North East" and replace with "South West". Lady Hopkins

Managing Director Sorry for the complications. William Taylor Don't hesitate to contact us should you require and further information. • Directors David Selby James Greaves Andrew Barnett Yours sincerely, Pamela Bate Simon Fraser Michael Taylor Edward Williams Ernest Fasanya Patrick Nee Chris Bannister O.oTE RE§:e ~ 9 JUN 2004 Jonathan Knight Tom Holdom Hopkins Architects AlLOCAl@l): GR611P Financial Director OF~,elft Henry Buxton ACKN~L&QQ&"''"''''!'1 Project Directors cc. Arif Mehmood Corin Mellor DMD REPlY: Jan Mackie Mike Cook Buro Happlod FILE AL.LoeAfION: Peter Mouncey Laura Carrara-Cagni COPIEOlO: Gary Clark Julie Gaulter . Tom Holdom . Ken Hood J Tim Sloan

Hopkins Architects Ltd Registered in England and Wales No 3241431 .. j , ... .' .... ;"j " r .~ ,II .I' ' , • ~- j I". I""> ... 1.11 J fiji l, . \ , i7 D • / . j ~} David Mellor Visitor Centre .J 08.06.04

David Mellor New Visitor Centre Design Statement

The David Mellor site at Hathersage attracts an increasing number of visitors and this project is borne from a desire to give something back to those visitors that make the effort to come to the site.

The proposal is for a new building to house an existing exhibition showing the work of David Mellor over the last 50 years. It will also house a small cafe serving light refreshments.

It is proposed that the new building will be located between, and linked to, the existing shop building and Retort House and facing the Round Building for which Hopkins were also the Architects.

..The Building: _e new building fills an awkward gap, which is currently used as car parking (9 spaces), this improves the setting of the Round Building and makes a more coherent row of buildings at the rear of the site.

The plot has a strong relationship with the Round Building; sitting in the row of four existing buildings it faces directly on to the Round Building.

For this reason it is felt that an architectural 'conversation' should be apparent between the new and the old. This is achieved in part by the use of similar materials; lead roof and grey steelwork, but also as a formal relationship by opening up the front (South West) elevation of the proposed building and allowing views out to the Round Building and surrounding woodland. The front elevation is glazed so that it is readily perceived as an open public building and place of arrival, rather than the 'closed' stone fac;;ades of the adjacent buildings. With the gable elevations shaded by the adjacent existing buildings on either side, and the Rear (North East) elevation against a 3m high retaining wall, glazing the Front elevation also enables the building to maximize the use of natural daylight for the exhibition. A row of glass louvers above the elevation of fixed glazing provides natural, cross ventilation in .mbination with a similar set of louvers on the rear elevation.

With its open front, this is a different type of building to the adjacent stone buildings. We feel this is a positive and necessary distinction, as the Visitor Centre is effectively the public entrance of the site, and therefore needs to present itself as a more obviously open and -- -welcomingboilding:------_ The use of timber panels at the gable walls helps maintain this difference, whilsfafsoligfitening-- --- the ends of the building which, in stone would form an overbearing, heavy element to an otherwise light and open building. This is particularly apparent on the perspective drawing, where the open front fac;;ade can be seen in relation to the gable ends.

To ensure that the massing of the building is coherent with existing adjacent Shop Building, the eaves and ridge heights of the new lead roof are the same as the Shop. The roof has an oversailing eaves which provides a sheltered seating area along this elevation. Built-in timber benches are proposed both internally and externally for the full length of this elevation.

Registered Office: Hopkins Architects. Registered in England number: 3241431 Registered address: 49a Downshire Hilt london NW3 1NX ~ The Links: NP/00 OJ 0 0l} / 653 Links are proposed between the new and adjacent buildings on either side. These links will provide the entrance to the new building and the existing Shop and Retort House, they will also accommodate new WC's. The front elevation will be glazed, with a lead roof. The rear elevation of the Links and the Visitor Centre will be rendered to match the rear elevation of both the workshop and house buildings.

Hopkins Architects •

•

--~~ --~~

--~- Hopkins Architects Limited Job reference 27 Broadley Terrace, London NWl 6LG Tel:0207724l75l Fax:Q2077237393

Wor1

Purpose Of Issue Planning

Client: David Mellor 8,6.2004 The Round Building Date Of Issue Hathersage Sheffield S32 lBA Package

IBImDI-'-R"'e-'v-'is-'-i-'o_n-'s ---'

Architect's Comments

0' ibution

4 Peak District Planning 1 Corin Mellor - David Mellor 1 Mike Cook - Buro Happold

Orawing No Rev Title Scale

A DMC EOO2 01 South West (Back) Elevalion 1:100 A DMC SPOOl 01 Site Plan 1:2500 • ------~D_6_0_-4-L ID---

Issued for and on behalf of Hopkins Architects Limited, Page II] of II] ~}'?r:,~ .. ,r~:::., HopkIns A~chitects ltd. Regrstered in England number 3241431 Registered address: 49a Downshlre HIli London NW31NX } "' " Hopkins Architects Limited 27 Broadley Terrace, London NWI 6LG Tel: 020 77241751 Fax: 0207723 7393

Wol1

Purpose Of Issue Planning

Cllent: David Mellor 10.6.2004 The Round Building Date Of Issue Hathersage Sheffield S32 1BA Package

IE!!I!D!I!III Planning Application

Architect's Comments South East Elevation and corrected site boundary drawings.

1 Peak District Planning 4 Corin Meltor • David Mellor

Drawing No Rev Title Scale

A DMC SPOOl 02 Site Plan 1:2500 A DMC SP002 01 Existing Block Plan 1:500 A DMC SP003 01 Proposed Block Plan 1:500 ~XOO3 00 East Gable Elevation 1:50 NP10 DDI '0 60 l~ I 65:3

DATE REC'D , I JUN ZOO~ ALLOCATED: GRUlJ~ OI'~ICER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT' REP!. Y: • "'lE AllOCATION' COI'IEO roo .

Issued for and on behalf of Hopkins Architects Limited. Page rr=J of rr=J ~, $.~' Hopkins Architects Ltd. RegIstered in England number 3241431 Registered address: 49a Downshlre Hill London NW3 1NX PEAK DlSJRICT NAT!OHAl. pARK iitmQRlIl

DATE REC'[\ "JUN 2004

ALLOCATED G"OU~ f\.IL OFFICER (y--) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Adrian Kirkham REPLY: Senior Planning Officer (North Area) FILE ALLOCATION: Peak District National Park Authority COPIED TO. Aldern House Baslow Road Bakewell Derbyshire DE451AE NP/DDDIO 604 / 653 10th June 2004 • Re: The David Mellor New Visitor Centre Planning Application Dear Adrian,

Further to your letter ref DC1.2/KZ/ received today we are sending the information required.

• Further 3 copies of application form • 4 copies showing South East elevation (which is as North West elevation) 27 Broadley Terrace London NW1 6LG • 4 copies of each of the drawings showing the site boundary which has T02077241751 been corrected to show the exact site area (133sqm) F 020 7723 0932 E [email protected] www.hopkins.co.uk These are all issued under IN 03. Don't hesitate to contact us should you require and further information. Chairmen Sir Michael Hopkins Lady Hopkins

Managing Director Yours sincerely, William Taylor

Directors • David Selby James Greaves Andrew Barnett ----______~mela~ - - - -Simon-Fraser- __ Tom Holdom Michael Taylor Edward Williams Hopkins Architects Ernest Fasanya Patrick Nee Chris Bannister cc. Jonathan Knight Corin Mellor DMD Financial Director Henry Buxton

Project Directors Arif Mehmood Jan Mackie Peter Mouncey Laura Carrara-Cagni Gary Clark Julie Gaufter Tom Heldom Ken Hood Tim Sloan

Hopkins Architects LId Registered in England and Wales No 3241431 NP100 DI 0 604 I 653

Adrian Kirkham Senior Planning Officer (North Area) Peak District National Park Authority Aldern House Baslow Road Bakewell Derbyshire DE451AE

02nd June 2004 • Re: The David Mellor New Visitor Centre Planning Application Dear Adrian,

Further to our meeting at the David Mellor Round Building on Thursday 27'h of May, we are pleased to submit a Planning Application for the new Visitor Centre.

Please refer to the enclosed drawings and design statement for details of the proposal. We are happy for these documents to be forwarded to the 27 Broadley Terrace London NW1 6LG consultees. T02077241751 F 020 7723 0932 E [email protected] We look forward to hearing from you. Please do not hesitate to contact www.hopkins.co.uk us should you require any further information, or need to discuss the proposal. Chairmen Sir Michael Hopkins Lady Hopkins

Managing Director Yours sincerely, William Taylor

Directors David Selby James Greaves Andrew Barnett - ~ ~ ~~-~ REC'DTN_~_n~_N~_I;-N~-;-~-4~ Pamela Bate DATE ~Simon--Ffasef- _ ---- . Michael Taylor Edward Williams Hopkins Architects OCATED: GROUP .(>.Q... Ernest Fasanya OFFiCER \\-. ~ Patrick Nee 'Chris Bannister cc. o'NOWLEOGEMENT: 'Jonathan Knight Corin Mellor DMD LV: Financial Director Mike Cook Buro Happlod :.I.LOCATION: .Henry Buxton 'v. I project Directors Arif Mehmood ~an Mackie feter Mouncey laura Carrara-Cagni Gary Clark Julie Gaulter Tom Holdom Ken Hood Tim Sloan

Hopkins Architects Ltd Registered in England and Wales No 3241431 ,'" ("'" . ~Jr/0[)O/ (i < I U David Mellor Visitor Centre 02.06.04

David Mellor New Visitor Centre Design Statement

The proposal is for a new building to house an existing exhibition showing the work of David Mellor over the last 50 years. It will also house a small cate serving light refreshments.

It is p'roposed that the new building will be located between, and linked to, the existing shop building and Retort House and facing the Round Building for which Hopkins were also the Architects.

_he Building: -the new building fills an awkward gap, which is currently used as car parking (9 spaces), this improves the setting of the Round Building and makes a more coherent row of buildings at the rear of the site.

The plot has a strong relationship with the Round Building; sitting in the row of four existing buildings it faces directly on to the Round Building.

For this reason it is felt that an architectural 'conversation' should be apparent between the new and the old. This is achieved in part by the use of similar materials; lead roof and grey steelwork, but also as a formal relationship by opening up the front (South West) elevation of the proposed building and allowing views out to the Round Building and surrounding woodland. The front elevation is glazed so that it is readily perceived as an open public building and place of arrival, rather than the 'closed' stone fayades of the adjacent buildings. With the gable elevations shaded by the adjacent existing buildings on ~ither side, and the Rear (North East) elevation against a 3m high retaining wall, glazing the Front elevation also enables the building to maximize the use of natural daylight for the exhiQition. -f. row of glass louvers above the elevation of fixed glazing provides natural, cross ventilation in '.ombination with a similar set of louvers on the rear elevation.

To ensure that the massing of the building is coherent with existing adjacent Shop Building, the eaves and ridge heights of the new lead roof are the same as the,Shop. The roof has an oversailing eaves which provides a sheltered seating area along this elevation. Built-in-timlJe,lJenches ·are-proposed-both-intemally·-anQ- externally-for-the. fulLlength.oLthis elevation. The solid gable and rear walls are proposed as timber panelling set with simple metal frames.

The Links: Links are proposed between the new and adjacent buildings on either side. These links will provide the entrance to the new building and the existing Shop and Retort House, they will also accommodate new we's. The front elevation will be glazed, with a lead roof and timber rear elevati1r~nMiiiiiiBiC:iiiOO_;;'AliIP~\iiP.t<~.~ll,~~iilllU-iiltY~

D"rr: ~EC'D -! JUN ?OO~

Hopkins Architects "LlOC,ATEn: Glmut OfFlCEi'\ ACKNOWlEOOEMt.W: REPlY: Registered Office: Hopkins Architects. Registered in England number: 3241431 Registered address: 49a Downshire Hill L II _tJl' NP/0DOf 0 604/ 653 DAVID MELLOR

Peak Park Planning I j Proposal for David Mellor Exhibition Centre - May 2004 The Round Building DavId MaUor CUtlery factory, 1990 Michael Hopkins and Partners The proposal is for the construction of an exhibition centre adjacent to the famous Round Building, David Mellor's cutlery factory in Key Designs Hathersage. The centre wili allow the public free access to a sizeable and fascinating collection of fifty years of David Mellor's design work, and will include multi-media displays illustrating the cutlery design and production process. The Round Building, designed by Sir Michael Hopkins, has received numerous architectural and environmental awards and is already a very popular visitor attraction. People come to see a working cutlery factory where each piece of cutlery is still hand made by skilled craftsmen from locally sourced steel. The visitor centre would put the factory in a historic context of design and manufacturing - and provide a major new cultural amenity for visitors to the Peak 1953 'Pride' cutlery silver plate National Park. Designed when David Mellor was still a student at the Royal College of Art. London. Included In the first David Mellor is one of Britain's leading designers, a Royal Designer for Design Centre Awards in 1957 and in production ever since. Industry recently awarded the CBE. Over the last frfty years he has ~---- influenced the visual culture of Britain in many different areas of design. .,---,\ Frequently referred to as the 'Cutlery King', the Sheffield born designer is best known for his beautiful yet functional cutlery, but his modern designs have helped to change the country's whole approach to objects as everyday as traffic lights and hand tools. His work for Abacus in the 1960s revolutionised the appearance of British street furniture. His silverware commissioned by the government for British embassies was

one of the important design initiatives of its period. 1959 Bus shelter galvanised steel .' The Round Building already attracts a large number of visitors Used nationally rrom 1959. David Mellor was responSible for the first interested in seeing the manufacturing process in progress. We receive modern street furniture In Britain. ._ numerous reguests for tours of the site: amongst these many are from schools, colleges and national and international organisations. We gi'''v-=-e-- -- as many tours as we can, and participate in the annual Heritage Open Days which are aiways extremely well attended and a great success. We feel that the current level of interest clearly demonstrates that there is a need for an exhibition centre, providing more contextual information and enhancing the visitor experience J The Round Building contributes to the economic well-being of the I ,1963 ~ ...; .. ~...~ 'Embassy' teapot silver area. We support a number of local and regional festivals and events t' Part of a large scale g~verrvnent and we are active in promoting tourism in the Peak National Park. The commission to Mellor for ~ handmade silver tableware for exhibition centre would offer visitors an additional attraction which British embassies.

~ .. ., I I I I I I I I I I I o I I I I I I I I o I I I I I I I I I I f' I I /! t",'} .-, 'i!, J \ , ~ '*'

would be of more than local significance, drawing visitors from further afield. At the same time it would link a great British designer to local tradition and industry.

The Round Buiiding is itself a much admired example of environmentally sound architecture, made from natural, locally sourced materials. The

new exhibition centre wouid be constructed on the same principles, David Mellor and would be designed by the same architect, Sir Michael Hopkins, to In the ParK Lane workshop, middle 1960s complement the existing buildings on the site.

Note on exhibits The exhibits will be drawn from the David Mellor archive collection, see attached illustrations of some of the major works. These were last seen in public at the David Mellor retrospective at the Design Museum, London, and the Mappin Gallery, Sheffield, in 1998.

David Mellor Key Designs continued

1963 1965 1966 1966 Candelabrum 16-llght sliver Canteen cutlery stainless steel National traffic light system Square pillar box Post Office CommiSSioned from DavId Mellor Government commisslooed as the Commissioned by the Department The design aroused public by 1tle WorsIipU compcny 01 standard cutIeiy for ofllce canteens, of the Environment. Mellor's design controversy as a departure from • GoIdsmlIt1s hospitals, prisons, British Raj etc. is stiR In use tlToughout the UK. the traditional pillar box.

+."

1968 1969 1973 Bronze Fountain University Disposable cutlery white plastic Handmade bowl silver Botanic Garden, Cambridge. Designed for Cross Paperware Commissioned by the ~~,'f . Throughout the 19605 Mellor and made in millions. Company to commemorate ~ _. combined special one-off 200th Anniversary of thet6hl3'mefd', commissions for street furniture Assay Otftce. ..'•.~ ~'/:... '{;-~ and industrial design. ~. J< "0 \J ..--: ". ,~./ .;.. .. .;~ • .ti' , ,• !~ i :1· ~ , ~/ ", , :....~ I~-·_.~?~--- I~ " , <.? e

. ," ...... 'f".,. :...... +. . -"1" h • . .. .

.. +.. •f

'I ' !Ii NP/DDD/O B04 / 653

David Mellor Key Designs continued

11)1 J

1975 19n 1986 1993 Outdoor seating with tubular 'Chinese Ivory' with acetal resin Cutlery for people with a 'Paris' cutlery stainless steel steel frame and steel wire seat handles physical disability Designed by David Mellor and DesIgned by David Mellor for An iconic design of the period. Ergonomically designed as part of manufactured at the Round Abacus. the Helen Hamlyn Foundation's Building. campaign to Improve IMng • standards for e1derty people. f I

I L~

1998 1999 2002 2000 'City' cutlery 'Transit' folding trolley Kitchen knives stainless steel 'Minimal' One of David Mellor's most Chromed steel. Designed for the A new departure for Meltor. These One of David Mellor's most recent popular designs which exploits the Italian manutacturef, Magis. are made at the Round Building at cutlery desgns and arguably one latest technological advances to Hathersage, near Sheffield. of his most InnovatIve. arrtve at its unique sculptural form . • I!W. ;tiOtWJNii1i'ti!U ~~TE REC'O - 3 JUN 200' ALlOC~TEO: GROUf' OfftCE~ ~CKM()WlEDGE~EMT: REPLY: - _- FilE ~llOC~t1OM: lO"

.... ~. II ., NATIONAL-PARK AUTHORITY- Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedure) Order 1995 Certificate under Article 7 Certificate A

I certify that:-

(a) "owner" means a on the day 21 days before the date of the accompanying application nobody, except the person having a freehold interest or a applicant, was the owner (a) of any part of the land to which the application relates. leasehold interest, the unexpired term of which is less than 7 years.

THIS MUST BE COMPLETED IN EVERY CASE Agricultural Holdings Certificate Instructions • One ofthe following alternative paragraphs must form part ofthis certificate. " the site is not part ofan agricultural holding cross out the 2nd paragraph and sign and date the form. If it is part of an agricultural holding, firstly cross out the 1st paragraph. Secondly is there a tenant? If no, enter 'not applicable' in the space allowed on the form for the applicant's name, address and date ofservice ofNotice, then sign and date the form. " yes, enter their name, full postal address where you have served the Notice and date you served the Notice on them, then sign and date the form. You need to use the Notice attached to Certificate B. Complete it and serve it on the tenant. You can serve the Notice by eitherhanding it to the tenant in person orby post.

• None of the land to which the application relates is, or is part of, an agricultural holding. or, - , ..., -~_._.- ..... ~:~a~v~~e~a:p~p~'E::2~~~:::~:~:~:~~~~:~~~~::~·r'self who, 0 ys e ore the date of the application, was atenant of an· agricultural

• Tenant's name PfAK DISIBICT NA1JQN~~R!' \I~ Address at which notice DATEREC'O - 3 JUN 2lI04 was served ALLOCATED: GROUP OFFICER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: REPLY: Date on which notice FILE' ALLOCATION: was served COPtEDTO; t Signed: H~'};~/J J!H';;f}~·i"rE c -r.r ..; • On behalf of: c:.'?¥.,J."! M.E;.I,.,..bl:'..I? . Date: ?,.~.. :..'?r.: .. •..~ .

.. Delete where inappropriate Fo.~M liCP 1. NPIDDDIO 604 I 653 NAtIONAL PARle AUTHORITY APPLICATION FOR PLANNING PERMISSION TO DEVELOP LAND ETC Town and Country Planning Act 1990

Please read the guidance notes before you fill in any part of this form.

Please send four completed copies of this form and four copies of the plans to the Peak District National Park Authority, Aldem House, Baslow Road, Bakewell, Derbyshire DE451AE.

PART 1

1. Applicant (BLOCK CAPITALS PLEASE) Agent (if any) to whom correspondence should be sent (BLOCK CAPITALS PLEASE) "F'.A. o· ~ ...... th LD","t Name C.OR IN M F / L till Name -H-oPKfN ." jt.(" if (77="c7.r t-Tn

Address ~ -eou iV.P /;'HILn/ff I: Address "2-9- &12-., A Pl-E.V" ~,z12 .. ££:.

/+,. tW,r:;., <" A-&-€ r #-1"..1=T/( r- .. l..4 V.oo'J Postcode S j"2. /8 "1 ITel. No Postcode NOoJ( eLf'. ITel. No. 021:> ?72'f- r-r"/

Proposals for which pennissJon is sought

a. Full address or location ofthe land to which this /fJ ~ >h" (Ii- ( rAN T ,- ,f 0 0 v Eo application relates and site area (hectares or n<.~.A - ..,..., U-~, -rA V 6 acres)

b. Brief particulars of proposed development N"E." J((J/7?' (. r-: ""77l.. €- 711 n-.. uJ*

Including the purpose(s) for which the land and/or e-<:H-71J ( 7>(J (/ (IF PI'h//O ,ue"nn

buildings are to be used JJ r:-r / "-If J" LJ.N" -II--> #tJ t: .rIA >h' , C~C J~v(Arfr LlIf.#-7 p-Fpl2eJ1!ME;pJT.1 4 ( N NT c. State whether applicant owns or controls any YF'<:. adjoining land, If Yes, give its location and edge In blue on submitted plans

d. State whether the proposal Involves: New building(s) YeslNo If resldentJal development, state number of dwelling: unlls proposed and type If known eg, houses, bungalows, flats ii Retention of existing building(s) YeslNe pEM 0lS!R1CT NAlJOfW. PARK!ynpurt Iii Alteration or extension -¥<>8INo OATEREC'D Iv Change of use ¥e6lNo 1 1 JUN 2004 v Construction of a new access to a vehicular VeslNo I\LLOCATED: G~()Ult highway pedestrian ¥eslNo OFFICER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: vi Al1eration of an existing access to a vehicular Ve6lNo highway pedestrian v.;§/No REPLY: ~W~ATION: vii Removal ofvariation of a condition Ye/No Ity d.nd reference of previous ap lieatlon

viii Mineral working ~o ix Waste disposal ¥eelNo x Other operations v-tNo • 3: Particulars of Application Are you applying for: i Full planning permission Yesllllu il OuUine planning permission 'RMJNo ~ If Yes, tick the items for which you are seeking approval in this application: 1. Siting 0 3. External 0 appearance 2. Design 0 4. Means of 0 access 5. Landscaping 0

iii Approval of reserved matters following the grant ¥eslNo ~ If Yes, state the date and number of ouUlne of ouUine permission permission Date Number NPJ Iv Renewal of a temporary permission or ~No ~ If Yes, state the date and number of previous permission for retention of building or permission and identify the particular condition continuance of use without complying with a Date condition subject to which planning permission Number NPJ has been granted The condition

4. Please state I Present use of buildingsltand c>t< 1'1/- It K II Ifvacant, the last previous use • .1-'I' .... ,

b. Is the application for Industrial, office, Y.MINo If Yes, please complete extra form warehouse, storage or shopping purposes? c. Does the proposed development involve the v-INo If Yes, indicate their position on plans felling ofany trees? d. I How will surface water be disposed of? eg, mains, soakaway. etc. Is this system existing or proposed? {(J1,}Ale, 77o v r/'f To e;-~

e. Are there any public rights ofway crossing the 'taINo If Yes, indicate on plans site? f. How many vehicle parking spaces do you intend Existing spaces within site 2.,. New or additional spaces ~ to provide? ~t§.T¥/11V Z.s- .r 1""tt £ £. g. Are there any buildings to be demolished? v.eJNo If Yes, please Indicate positions on plan

Fee State the amount of fee submitted with the application £44-0

6. lfINe apply for: (Tick appropriate box) el a. Planning permission to carry out the development described In this application and the attached plans, and in accordance therewith. 0 b. Planning permission to retain buildings or works already constructed or carried out, or a use of land already Instituted as described on this application and the attached plans. 0 c. Approval of details ofsuch matters as were reserved in the ouUine permission specified herein and are described in this application and the attac/1ed plans.

lfINe understand that this is an application for planning pennission only and not for any other fonn of application which may be required.

M G I-L 0. te.. Date 2.~ . 0,. ol.f Signed On behalf of c.ollIN (insert appllcanfs name if signed by an agent) """"M I"\.!' I

KEY:

o Painted MIld Steel (dark grey) ® Timber (pI len pinel

PEAl< DISTRICT NATIOMflE; AiffiiORIIY DATE REC'D _ 3 JUN 2004 ALLOCATED: GROUP , OFFICER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: REPLY: FILE ALLOCATION: COPIED TO:

,i \ \"\~ .

.....,---'

.....c'::r .! D ;:~~~-~ .,m:, • ;:.:~.;~"i~~;;~·

, '. t ~_'L~"T"" ".,-,.1.. - :- - ~ f_'! ".".'----,"--- i ~::' ~rn; _: _- ..1 ","T'T ;~-~'m:CIJ;::T . ., • -;-_:., ,L:-- 'rn'L,L~: .~,,...-.CCJ---- 1 .~ .. _~._ ® ® ® .. . .

"T , T ..i.. L~. L "'r .... ""I , .i gas meter

Existing Retort Building Lm' New Visitor centre c" Existing Shop Building

Dale Rei. Rovlslon Project David Mellor New Visj tor Centre Project Reference 02.06.04 00 Issued 'or planning. INOO1 DMC

Subject Sout West (Back) elevation Drawing Number A DMC E002 Scale 1 : 100 I Date 25.05.04 Revision 00

Architects Hopkins Architects Ltd. 27 Broadie)' Terrace london NW' .LG t: 020 7724 1751 e: mall hopklns.co.uk

If:) CooyrlQht Hopkins Architects Ltd. Do Not SClle. U.e Figured Dimension, Only. All Dimensions to be cheeked on site. Origin.' Drawing SI;r:8 A3 tLI Registered Office; Hopkins Architects Ltd. Registered In England number: 324131 Registered ~ddress: 498 Downshlre Hill London NW3 1NX - \" -- J -, f" i( , \ .. 1\:1 I I 'to.:...." ~ KEY: o Painted Mild Steel (dark grey) I Timber lpilch pinel I® 1@ Glass ® Lead roof l@ York Stone

Rendered wall 10 match rear of eXisting I® Workshop and House bUIldings

PEAK D~TRJcr NATIQ/jAL PARK AUTlQ/I}' DATE REeD - 9 JUN 2004 ,~LLOCATED: GROUP OFFICER ACKNOWLEOGEMEHT; REPLY: FILE ALLOCATION: COPIED TO:

/' .r/

-0 ------il D ;, , '": J '-

~-:.-

Existing Retort Building Uok New VIsitor Centre Existing Shop Building

Dele Ref. Revision Project David Mellor New Visitor Centre Project Reference DMC 02.06.04 00 Issued for planning. INOO1 08.06.04 01 Shadow gap added In render. Issued for planning. INOD2 Subject North East (Back) elevation Drawing Number A DMC E002 Scale 1 : 100 I Date 25.05.04 , Revision 01 Architects Hopkins Architects Ltd. 27 Broadley Terrece london "WI OLG t: 020 7724 1751 e: mall hopklns.co.uk

(C) Coo,rlgt!t HopkIns Archlhcta Ltd. Do Not Scale. USII Figured DimensionS Only. All Dimensions to be checked on IIlte. OrigIn,' Drawing Sl:u A3 ILl Registered Office: Hopkins Architects ltd. Registered In England number: 324131 Reglslered address: 49a DownshlTe Hill London NW3 1NX KEY: !~ Pamted MIld Steel (dark grey) NP/DDU/J • / o o 53 ® Timber (pilCh pinel © Glass ® Lead roof ® York Stone 3553 14400 3553 ® Rendered wailio match rear of existing buildings r r , , , 1_' , E'llstlng retaining wall , dotted IIn8 Indlcatea cndatlng Relort BuildIng bridge~ , . , , . ········0 , I: I , ,, , .. .' D ,,' . , - -~- r : .•.. :. '7~········.'··-''''... : ~ ••. ······.·····.·.··.·····0 - : ®- ...... "'0'.. ,. ®- ;... . . , :, ····t r .- ... ~ ... .. ; .' !.. ...

::,: . i .. \ "- .. ; i:; i ., .. .• ... '.

. . , . ..

, .... ! i ; i - ...... " .c". _..- ,- , - ,. ,...... , .. " .. ;. -~ , "', !" ...... I~- -e- -'--. -I,' -- .- ,,,... -- .+ ". ·1 ' . ,,-- .. .. 1''' .... I' , -- . . 'I ! k..·· . ,., ...... 'I··.. ~ ...... ! I'· I'···.. .

,~ ...... - ..... 1'. ...{- . " I·"....· ".;, , .- ... I I· .. - i ; I' ~~:o' - ,=-======-=-=--... I·',,, .. . -- - ,., --- .. ,,---- over8alling link roof---~ --, -- -- -

Existing Shop Building Unk I entrance New VIsitor centre link JEntrance rePEAJ(w~p~lSliiIR!iIlUTi«Aiil1Olfii~~II'i!,iiiiii~in g

DATE REC'D - 3 JUN 2004 ALLOCATED: GROUP OfFICER ACKNOWLEOGEMENT: REPLY: FILE ALLOCATION: COPIED TO: \

Dale Ref. Revision Project David Mellor . New V isil or Cen lr e Project Reference DMC 02.06.04 00 Issued f., planning. INOO1

Subject ROOF PLAN Drawing Number A DMC L002 Scale 1 : 100 I Date 25.05.04 Revision 00 Architects Hopkins Architects LId. 27 Broadley Terrace london NW1 6LG t: 020 7724 1751 e: m.1I hopklns.co.uk

® CooYriAht Hooklns Architects Ltd. Do Not 5c.18. Use Figured Dimensions Only. All Dlm8n\ilons to be checked on site. Origin. I Drawing SIze 1\3 III Registered Office: Hopkins Architects Ltd. Registered In England number: 324131 Reglst~redr--' -.address:.-- 49a Oownshlre Hill London HW3 1NX KEY: o Painted Mild Sleelldark grey) ® Timber (pitch pmel

@ Glass

® Lead roof ® York Slone ® Rendered wall to match rear of eXisting building

Uno of window ----'------7) lintel on Oltl8tln9 ~ shop building beyond I~---{C line of elllsting shop building beyond line 0' window ------, sill on exlstlf\9 shop building beyond -j----+---( F ~·····~···I )l ® rr-- existing gas meter

dralnago channel ..x .

Gable elevation (Existing Shop Building beyond)

------~- PEAK DlSIRJCT NAT!ONM PARK AlfTHClflIIY I DATEREC'D f f JUN 2004 ~JI) AllOCATED: GIlOU," c:!) OFFICER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: .:::r.->0 1 REPLY: ! FILE ALLOCATION: ; COPIED TO: 0)" \ <..$1 (.N

Dale Revision 3 Project David Mellor - New Visitor Centre Project Reference DMC 10.06.04 Issued lor plannIng INO

Subject East Gable elevation Drawing Number A DMC X003

Scale 1:50 I Date 10.06.04 Revision 00

Architects Hopkins Architects 27 Broadley Terrece London NW1 BLG t: 020 7724 1751 e: mall hopklns.co.uk

Copyright Hopkins Archllects Ltd. Do Not Scale. U.e Figured Dlmen.lont Only. All Dlmerulonll to be checked on lllte. Orlglna' Drawing Size A3 iLl

,1 1 i

I I ". j

, , • - I 'I \ I KEY: o Painted Mild Steelldark grey} ® TImber (pilCh pinel

,------.------~------~---- • gas meIer

new opening in Shop gable wall -+-----.. '""----- new opening In Retort building gable wall •o Existing Shop Building Existing Retort Building

MDIS1BICINAUONM '&BK~ Unk I entrance New Visitor Centre Unk I Entrance DATE REC'D - 3 JUN 2004 OGATED: GROUP - OCflCER :KNOWLEOGEMENT: EPLY: .iLE AlLOC"TIOH: ICOPIEO TO: I

Date Ref. Revision Project David Mellor New Visi t or Centre Project Reference DMC 02.06.04 00 Issued lor plannIng. INOOl

Subject GROUNDFLOOR PLAN Drawing Number A DMC LOOI Scale 1 : 100 I Date 25.05.04 Revision 00 ArGhitects Hopkins Architects Ltd. 27 Broadley Terrace London NWl BLG t: 020 7724 1751 e: mall hopklns.co.uk

© CoPyright Hopkins Archltech ltd. Do Not Selle. Use Figured DimensIons Onl,. All Dlmen,lon. to be checked on .Ite. Original Drawing Size A3 ILl Registered Office: Hopkins Architects Ltd. Registered In England number: 324131 Registered address; 498 Downshlre HlI1london NW3 1NX

.. , ~. "., . . , I: Ili II KEY: ~"- ~ o Painted Mild Steel (d~?k in@ (.O@) Glass .,® Lead roof

'4j-® -,0 - .'~ --""

... _- {'---:; ,; --..... If· JU~· - - ...... - JI ----L .::.:....-'"

I!E------{ C

E existing gills meier --+-7 (

dralnllge hannel

'------'------{ B Section (Retort Building beyond)

F )-----+-----t-

8 ®

exlstlng gall meter E

drainage

Gable elevation (Retort Building beyond)

Date Revl.lon Project David Mellor - New Visitor Centre Project Reference DMC 02.06.04 Issued for planning 'NO ,

Subject Section and Gable elevation Drawing Number A DMC XOOl

Scale 1:50 I Date 25.05.04 Revision 00

Architects Hopkins chitects 27 Broedlay Terrace ndon NW' BLG t: 020 7724 1751 e: mell hopklns_co.uk

Capyrlgnt Hopkins Architects Ltd. Do Nol Scellt. U.8 FIgured DImensions Only. All Dimension, 10 be cheeked on site. Orlgln81 Drawing Size A3 4Ll ; 'ell Q3:\<\Q:J ' 'I>lQU"'::lOn'W '311; '.I-'ki:'lCi :.J.j\'3IV39031MON)tO\f !:l3:J1~30 "1~D '03J,VOC)lW 'G8l NOr £ - O.03~ 3.1.\10 XDlIoAll1nli!fliliOUfIi 151SlM W1iI

,0 f.~, i 1,,5 ~

! !

."""": -, i I------If--J'[ ....__ .,._ , ... :"'oL line 01 New ViS lor Center behind~ __.L 1oooo",i-----~~-·~~:o-.~-~r_~·.~~:r~I~ I __ , . , • i T" -'------....-.• ..,.--...J...... ,..-----'·----T- , ! , , , j., _,_•••_ •• _. _:••• ... .._.L., .., __ ' -'-_~_,_._LL~-o. ~ .. .,,__J .. " -"oTo- ...... l_. , , ) - ~.~ '---r _:.. J. .1... - , "r J ~ ~

r'\ Section through Links - Retort Building Elevation / ..

..... ,

'--

~ z j ~ ".,I: i o0' .: 0>• ~ , • T -- -'L.;,,:=====r-"--,-·-·L-jl---,--=-<--::-_-'-H L __ Jj-L------,,-- ~ _L-,- L-,-__ ----1 QQI--T'---'-'--,-I~C---H c F .-- .... \ 0·-·7 .- -~ --~ behinll-+----+----;----'--.~_.,~:' line of New Visitor Center DO '

-", . -r ',------,·-11,1__ .: r' , 1_", ... ,-. 1-----:-----11' , - ..... _l. 'T ·F----T--· drainage channel ·~-;~:E~T T J. ,-,j '1' I , Ii -·T----·J."--,'·-,~-"·-~

line 01 existing winllows 10 be removed/ blocked Section through Links - Shop Building Elevation

Dele Revision 1 Project David Mellor . New Visitor Centre Project Reference WEL 02.06.04 Issued lor plannIng INO Subject Section through Links Drawing Number A DMC X002

~ Scale 1:50 r Date 25.05.04 Revision 00 ;• li Architects Hopkins Architects 27 Broadley Terrece London NW, BLG I: 020 7724 1751 e: mell hopklns.co.uk 0> Z• CODyrlght HODklnl Archltlctl Ltd. Do Not SCIre. Ule Figured Dlmenllons Onl .... All DImensIons to bl checked on slte. OrigInal Drawing Size A3 ILl PEAK DISJBICT &TIOH& !WlK N!I!!ORIIY OATE REC'D - 3 JUN 211114 ALLOCATED: GROUP OFFICE" ACKNOWWEOGEMEHt REPLY: FILE ALLOCATION: CQI'IEO TO: