Page & Turnbull

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Page & Turnbull MILL VALLEY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT MILL VALLEY, CALIFORNIA [ 17050] PREPARF.D FOR CITY OF f"liLL VALLEY, C,' PAGE & TURNBULL JANUARY 2021 imagining change in historic envronrnenls through design, research, and technology CITY OF MILL VALLEY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Final Draft January 2021 Prepared for: City of Mill Valley 26 Corte Madera Avenue Mill Valley, CA 94941 www.cityofmillvalley.org Prepared by: Page & Turnbull, Inc. PAGE &TURNBULL 170 Maiden Lane, 5 th Floor ~'f;"f• .,.•. ~ .. ,.,....'1 ~ & t~ A""11e.., t Joe.:.·n-:Tl'rr l ~ San Francisco, CA 941 08 http://www.page-turnbull.com/ Mayor Sashi McEntee I Vice Mayor john McCauley Council members Jim Wickham I Urban Carmel I Tricia Ossa Alan Piombo, City Manager TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................ 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................. .. ..... ....................... I I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 3 A PROJECT BACKGROUND & OB)EGIVES ............................................................................................................] B. DEFINITION OF GEOGRAPHICAL AREA ......... .................................. .......... .. ... ................................................... 3 C. METHODOLOGY & RESEARCH .......................................................................................................................... S D. HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT ............... .......... .......... ........................................................... ....... ................ 7 E. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ....... ..................................................... ....... ...... ..... .................. .... ................ 8 II. PREVIOUS SURVEYS, STUDIES, AND REPORTS ............................................... II Ill. GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATION ............. ....................................................... .... IS A. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT THEMES .......... ...... ................ ................... ................... .. .................................... 15 B. SUMMARY OF PROPERTY TYPES . ..................................... ,....... ...................... .... ....... .............. ., .. .... .......... /6 C. EVALUATION CR/TERIA ................................................................................ ,................. .................................. I7 IV. HISTORIC CONTEXT...................................................... ..................................... 23 A NATIVE AMERICAN & SPANISH MISSION PERIODS (10,000 BCE TO 1833) ................. ..................................... 23 B. MEXICAN RANCHO & EARLY AMERICAN PERIOD (1834 TO 1882) . ........ ................................. ...................... 29 C. OUTDOOR RECREATION & RESORTS (1883 TO /899) ,. .. ,........... ,.......................... ,............... ......................... .37 D. INCORPORATION & EARLY DEVELOPMENT ( 1900 TO 1929) ............ ............................................................... 6 7 E. THE GREAT DEPRESSION THROUGH WORLD WAR II (1930 TO 1945) .......................................................... 111 F. POST-WORLD WAR II DEVELOPMENT ( 1946 TO 1980) ............ .. ......... ........................................................ .. 141 G. POST-SCRIPT: 198/ TO PRESENT .................................................................................................................. 189 V. REFERENCES ........................................... .........................................-. ............ .......... 19 1 A BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................... ................. .......... .... ., .. ...................................... ....... ,..... ,., ... ,./91 B. MILL VALLEY HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICTS ............ ,................................ .. ........ ,....................... .................... 201 C. ENDNOTES ................................................................................................................................................... 203 Htslm7,. Context J lall!ll7111lt - Ctty Gomuil Rcut&JII Draj/ lvltll f/ alii!)' Exemlii!P.fum ma ry Marin CouniJ•, Calijimun EXECUTIVE SUMMARY "Note the following unparalleled attractions: -Fifty minutes from San Prancisco; delightful climate; perfect drainage; trout streams~ purest and best of water in great :\bundance; water sysrem now under construction; beautiful drives and perfect views of mountain, bay, forest and city. Forests of redwoods and other evergreen trees and shrubs; in fact all the attractions of city life, minus the discomforts of each " 1 So wrote auctioneer Samuel Ferguson, in a publication for the Tamalpais Land & Water Company land auction held on May 31, 1890. The auction resulted in the sale of approximately 200 acres of rhe former Rancho Sausalito land grant. At the rime of the auction, the area was overwhelmingly rural; fewer than ten homes were distributed across all of what is now Mill Valley. The scenic, forested lots located in the canyons and valleys of Mount Tamalpais offered a rural respite from the urban chaos and chilling fog of nearby San Francisco. With the construction of the North Pacific Coast Railroad spur to Mill Valley and, later, the Mill Valley & Mount Tamalpais Scenic Railway, increasing numbers of seasonal visitors flocked from San Francisco via feuy service and rail travel for summer camping, swimming, hiking, and hunting. Cabins, campgrounds, hotels, and lodges were established to cater to seasonal visitors. Mostlots purchased in 1890 were gradually developed with permanent residential homes. Civil engineer Michael O'Shaughnessy laid out a plan for Mill Valley that included a commercial downtown area as well as a pedestrian network of steps, lanes, and paths (SLPs). The town of Mill Valley was incorporated in 1900 and soon after became a haven for refugees displaced by the 1906 earthquake-many of whom fled San Francisco and resettled permanently in Mill Valley. During the early twentieth century, Mill Valley prospered as the population rapidly grew. Numerous civic, cultural, and recreational institutions were established, including the famous Dipsea Race (the oldest cross-country trail race .in the nation), the Outdoor Art Club and Mountain Play. After a period of sustained development, Mill Valley experienced a devastating fue in 1929 which damaged or desu:oyed over 100 homes. In the wake of the ftre, Mill Valley grappled with the financial downturn of the Great Depression. In 1937, the Golden Gate Bridge opened, connecting San Francisco and the Marin County peninsula v-ia the U.S. 101 highway- a development that changed Mill Valley forever. Reliance on ferries and passenger railroads sharply declined with the increasing accessibility of the personal automobile. During World War II and immediately following, Mill Valley experienced an explosion in population and housing construction. This growth resulted in tensions between e.x:panding development and a desire to conserve natural spaces and retain the small-town atmosphere. Today, Mill Valley continues to attract residents and visitOrs from San Francisco commuters co outdoor enthusiasts, who all appreciate the natural beauty and unique character of Mill Valley. During the late nineteenth century and early twentieth centuries, buildings constructed in Mill Valley ranged from rustic lodges and vernacular buildings to high-style examples of the First Bay Tradition, Tudor Revival, and Queen Anne styles. Mill Valley's population increased following its incorporation in 1900, in the aftermath of the 1906 earthquake, and throughoU[ the prosperous yeatS of the 1910s and 1920s. Residences, as well as commercial and institutional buildings, were constructed in a range of revival styles -including Tudor Revival and Spanish Colonial Rev1val- as well as Craftsman, Arts and Crafts and Bay Tradition regional styles. The 1940s were generally jcllltlrJl)l 202 1 Paga & ' THmbull.lm. Hutom· C(lntc..Yt Staiel!lmi- Ct(y Cortnt11 Re/)/ew Drr!fl 1\lfil/ V allO' Exer:utiue SutJ/mary Marin Com1(y, Califomia characterized by the construction of tracts of Minimal Traditional style houses. These homes included nwnetous houses built by developer Geotge Goheen who leveraged the influx of defense workers to the Marin County area leading up to and during World War II to access financing and otherwise rationed building materials. Following the end of the war, Mill Valley residential development included suburban tract developments that characterized much of national postwar growth. In addition to the typical California futach style houses, Mill Valley also was grounds for a awnber of experimentations in high~ sryle Modernist architecture-including Campbell & Wongs famous and prolific A-frame "Leisure House." A nwnber of prominent Bay Area architects designed homes and institutional buildings in Midcentury Modern and the Second and Third Bay Tradition regional modernist styles. Few extant resources survive from the Native American & Spanish Mission Periods (10,000 BCE to 1833) or the Mexican Rancho & Early American Periods (1834 to 1882), and as such any properties from these periods are likely to be significant evidence of the earliest history of Mill Valley. This historic context statement finds that sw:viving examples of Mill Valley's nineteenth century development may be historically significant for their association "vith the early
Recommended publications
  • Appendix H Cultural Resources
    GNOSS FIELD AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FINAL APPENDIX H CULTURAL RESOURCES This appendix contains the following items: The Cultural Resources Existing Conditions and Survey Methodology Report and Archaeological Survey to support the assessment of the effects of the proposed project on historic properties. Documentation of coordination with tribal governments including the FAA’s government-to-government consultations with tribes in accordance with Executive Order 13175 Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments and FAA Order 1210.20 American Indian and Alaska Native Tribal Consultation Policy and Procedures. Documentation of the FAA’s consultation with the California State Historic Preservation Office in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act that resulted in the FAA’s determination that the Gnoss Field Airport Runway Extension Project would have no effect on historic properties. Landrum & Brown Appendix H - Cultural Resources June 2014 Page H-1 GNOSS FIELD AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FINAL THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Landrum & Brown Appendix H - Cultural Resources June 2014 Page H-2 CULTURAL RESOURCES EXISTING CONDITIONS AND SURVEY METHODOLOGY REPORT AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT For the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to Evaluate the Proposed Extension of Runway 13/31 at Gnoss Field Airport Marin County, Novato, California Dwight D. Simons, Ph.C and Kim J. Tremaine, Ph.C., RPA TREMAINE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 859 Stillwater Road, Suite 1 West Sacramento, CA 95605 November 6, 2009 Revised July 18, 2011 Submitted To Landrum and Brown, Inc. 11279 Cornell Park Drive Cincinnati, OH 45242 Page H-3 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Shell Mounds and the Archaeology of Colonial Encounters in the San Francisco Bay Area, California
    Placing Refuge: Shell Mounds and the Archaeology of Colonial Encounters in the San Francisco Bay Area, California By Tsim Duncan Schneider A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Kent G. Lightfoot, Chair Associate Professor Junko Habu Professor Margaret W. Conkey Professor Kerwin Klein Spring 2010 Placing Refuge: Shell Mounds and the Archaeology of Colonial Encounters in the San Francisco Bay Area, California © 2010 by Tsim Duncan Schneider Abstract Placing Refuge: Shell Mounds and the Archaeology of Colonial Encounters in the San Francisco Bay Area, California by Tsim Duncan Schneider Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology University of California, Berkeley Professor Kent G. Lightfoot, Chair Spanish missions were established in the San Francisco Bay Area beginning in A.D. 1776 with the founding of Mission San Francisco de Asís (Mission Dolores). Native American accommodation and resistance to colonial settlements has been studied in a variety of contexts in California, including mission sites, but only recently have scholars challenged preconceptions of culture change to examine the range of sociocultural consequences that resulted from colonial encounters. With the present research I seek to identify the places beyond the mission quadrangles where hunter-gatherers both maintained cultural practices and negotiated the adoption of new ones, as well as the processes of cultural change and persistence. I examine a cluster of three shell mounds—CA-MRN-114, CA-MRN-115, and CA- MRN-328—located on the Marin Peninsula in the hinterland of Mission Dolores for evidence of long-term patterns of hunter-gatherer residence before, during, and after Spanish settlement (1776 -1830s).
    [Show full text]
  • WNCXI~Ioej Date Copyright 2009
    Excavating the Past for the Future: A Synthesis ofMarin County Prehistoric Archaeology by Eileen Barrow A thesis submitted to Sonoma State University in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS In Cultural Resources Management Thomas M. Origer, M.A. Ni~k L. Tipon;~ WNCXI~ioeJ Date Copyright 2009 by Eileen Barrow II AUTHORIZATION FOR REPRODUCTION OF MASTER'S THESIS/PROJECT I grant permission for the reproduction ofthis thesis in its entirety, without further authorization from me, on the condition the person or agency requesting reproduction absorb the cost and provide proper acknowledgement of authorship. Date: Signature iii Excavating the Past for the Future: A Synthesis of Marin County Prehistoric Archaeology Thesis by Eileen Barrow ABSTRACT Purpose of Study: The goal of this thesis is to lay a strong foundation on which future research can build. To accomplish this goal I will create a synthesis of the Marin County archaeological data (excluding Point Reyes National Seashore), primarily using information generated by cultural resources management excavation reports. Specifically, I will examine data pertaining to prehistoric research themes such as cultural chronology, settlement and subsistence patterns, technology, and economic and social organization. Most of the data needed to conduct this work are managed and stored by the California Historical Resources Information System; however, this synthesis would be incomplete if it did not include data generated through other means such as thesis and dissertation work. These data will be used to build a framework that 1) reflects the current state of research in prehistoric archaeology in Marin County, 2) identifies research 'dead zones', and 3) identifies research areas that would benefit from further study.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 T1l~1Ol1c Date Copyright 2012
    The Rediscovery of Mission San Rafael Arcangel: An Archaeological Snapshot of the 20th California Mission by Cassidy R. DeBaker A thesis submitted to Sonoma State University Rohnert Park, California in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER'S OF ARTS in Cultural Resources Management Adrian Praetzellis, Ph.D. laura Watt, Ph.D. Nick Tipon, B.A. 5 t1l~1ol1c Date Copyright 2012 Cassidy R. DeBaker ii AUTHORIZATION FOR REPORDUCTION OF MASTER'S THESIS I grant permission for the reproduction of this thesis in its entirety, without further authorization from me, on the condition that the person or agency requesting reproduction absorbs the cost and provides full and proper acknowledgement of authorship. Date: ~ Pt· ll, ?.o 1'2.- Ill The Rediscovery of Mission San Rafael Arcangel: An Archaeological Snapshot of the 20th California Mission Thesis by Cassidy R. DeBaker ABSTRACT Purpose: There has been very little written about Mission San Rafael Arcangel, especially in comparison to the other 20 California missions. Its documentary record is clouded with inconsistencies, omissions, and miscalculations, often raising more questions than answers. A very small body of primary documentation exits that describes the layout of the mission buildings, structures, and surrounding landscape during the Mission Period (1769-1834). A handful of artifacts have been recovered from within and in close proximity to the study area that can be loosely associated with the MSRA, but there has been no positive identification or attempt to locate the original buildings. The purpose of this study is to understand the early footprint of the mission complex, to identify the possible mission-era resource types, and to assess the overall potential for archaeological sensitivity within the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Conservation Plans Provide Long Term Guidance For
    Marin Islands National Wildlife Refuge: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Marin Islands National Wildlife Refuge San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge Complex P.O. Box 524 Newark, CA 94560 Marin Islands Telephone: 510/792 0222 Fax: 510/792 5828 National Wildlife Refuge U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1 800-344 WILD www.fws.gov July 2006 Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment %cover_mi_ccp-Laurie.indd 1 7/6/2006 3:49:49 PM Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long term guidance for management decisions and set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes and identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffing increases, operational and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition. Cover photo USFWS Marin Islands National Wildlife Refuge and State of California Ecological Reserve Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan Prepared By U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge Complex P.O. Box 524 Newark, CA 94560 Approved: ____________________________________________ Date: _____________________________ California Nevada Operations Manager Implementation of this Comprehensive Conservation Plan and alternative management actions/programs
    [Show full text]