DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 10 Salt Marsh Losses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 10 Salt Marsh Losses APPENDIX 10 Book 9 Part 4 of the Literature Search, Salt Marsh Losses THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Suffolk County Vector Control & Wetlands Management Long Term Plan & Environmental Impact Statement TaskTask 3:3: BookBook 9,9, PartPart 44 SaltSalt Marsh Losses Prepared for: Suffolk County Department of Public Works Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County, New York Prepared by: CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.C. 1200 Veterans Memorial Highway, Hauppauge, NY March 2006 THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Suffolk County Vector Control and Wetlands Management Long-Term Plan Literature Review Task Three – Book 9 – Salt Marsh Losses March 2006 SUFFOLK COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL AND WETLANDS MANAGEMENT LONG - TERM PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PROJECT SPONSOR Steve Levy Suffolk County Executive Department of Environment and Energy Michael Deering Commissioner Department of Public Works Department of Health Services Gilbert Anderson, P.E. David G. Graham, M.D. Chief Deputy Commissioner Acting Commissioner Louis Calderone Vito Minei, P.E. Deputy Commissioner Director, Division of Environmental Quality PROJECT MANAGEMENT Project Manager: Walter Dawydiak, P.E., J.D. Chief Engineer, Division of Environmental Quality, Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Suffolk County Department of Public Works, Division of Vector Health Services, Office of Ecology Control Martin Trent Dominick V. Ninivaggi Chief Superintendent Kimberly Shaw Tom Iwanejko Bureau Supervisor Principal Environmental Analyst Robert M. Waters Mary E. Dempsey Bureau Supervisor Biologist Laura Bavaro Senior Environmental Analyst Phil DeBlasi Environmental Analyst Jeanine Schlosser Principal Clerk Cashin Associates, PC i Suffolk County Vector Control and Wetlands Management Long-Term Plan Literature Review Task Three – Book 9 – Salt Marsh Losses March 2006 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Cashin Associates, P.C. ii Suffolk County Vector Control and Wetlands Management Long-Term Plan Literature Review Task Three – Book 9 – Salt Marsh Losses March 2006 SUFFOLK COUNTY LONG TERM PLAN CONSULTANT TEAM Cashin Associates, P.C. Hauppauge, NY Subconsultants Cameron Engineering, L.L.P. Syosset, NY Integral Consulting Annapolis, MD Bowne Management Systems, Inc. Mineola, NY Kamazima Lwiza, PhD Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY Ducks Unlimited Stony Brook, NY Steven Goodbred, PhD & Laboratory Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY RTP Environmental Westbury, NY Sinnreich, Safar & Kosakoff Central Islip, NY Bruce Brownawell, PhD & Laboratory Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY Anne McElroy, PhD & Laboratory Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY Andrew Spielman, PhD Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA Richard Pollack, PhD Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA Masahiko Hachiya, PhD Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA Wayne Crans, PhD Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ Susan Teitelbaum, PhD Mount Sinai School of Medicine, NY Zawicki Vector Management Consultants Freehold, NJ Michael Bottini, Turtle Researcher East Hampton, NY Robert Turner, PhD & Laboratory Southampton College, NY Christopher Gobler, PhD & Laboratory Southampton College, NY Jerome Goddard, PhD Mississippi Department of Health, Jackson, MS Sergio Sanudo, PhD & Laboratory Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY Robert Cerrato, PhD Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Hauppauge, NY Division of Environmental Quality Cashin Associates, PC iii Suffolk County Vector Control and Wetlands Management Long-Term Plan Literature Review Task Three – Book 9 – Salt Marsh Losses March 2006 This report was prepared by Cashin Associates (personnel including Jeffrey Kassner, John Schreck, PE, Kimberly Somers, and David Tonjes, PhD). Cashin Associates, PC iv Suffolk County Vector Control and Wetlands Management Long-Term Plan Literature Review Task Three – Book 9 – Salt Marsh Losses March 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .....................................................................................v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................................1 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................3 2. WETLANDS REGULATIONS ......................................................................................................................4 2.1. Federal Regulation...........................................................................................................................5 2.2. State Regulation...............................................................................................................................8 2.3. County Regulation .........................................................................................................................14 2.4. Local Regulation............................................................................................................................14 3. GENERAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH SALT MARSH LOSSES...........................................................27 4. US EXAMPLES OF RECENT MAJOR SALT MARSH LOSSES...................................................................41 4.1. Louisiana Coastal Marshes ............................................................................................................41 4.2. Jamaica Bay ...................................................................................................................................47 5. LONG ISLAND SALT MARSH OBSERVATIONS .......................................................................................53 5.1. NYSDEC .......................................................................................................................................53 5.2. NYSDOS .......................................................................................................................................55 5.3. The Nature Conservancy................................................................................................................57 5.4. Other Studies..................................................................................................................................58 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................69 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Sea Level Rise Rates, US East Coast (from NOAA Tide Gage Records)......................................35 Table 2. North Shore Wetlands Trends ........................................................................................................54 Table 3. Peconic Bay Wetlands Trends........................................................................................................54 Table 4. South Shore Wetlands Trends ........................................................................................................54 Table 5. Suffolk County and Downstate Significant Water Fowl Coastal Wetlands Trends........................58 Table 6. Coastal Marsh Project Classifications of Suffolk County NWI Salt Marshes................................62 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Comparison of CA NWI Salt Marsh Interpretation and NASA Coastal Marsh Project NWI Salt Marsh Interpretation .............................................................................................................61 Figure 2. Comparison of CA NWI Salt Marsh Interpretation and NASA Coastal Marsh Project NWI Salt Marsh Interpretation .............................................................................................................63 Figure 3. Comparison of CA NWI Salt Marsh Interpretation and NASA Coastal Marsh Project NWI Salt Marsh Interpretation .............................................................................................................64 Figure 4. Comparison of CA NWI Salt Marsh Interpretation and NASA Coastal Marsh Project NWI Salt Marsh Interpretation .............................................................................................................65 Cashin Associates, PC v Suffolk County Vector Control and Wetlands Management Long-Term Plan Literature Review Task Three – Book 9 – Salt Marsh Losses March 2006 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CCMP Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan CDs Conservation Districts CMP Coastal Management Plan CWA Clean Water Act ECL Environmental Conservation Laws FINS Fire Island National Seashore FWA Freshwater Wetlands Act GIS Geographical Information System LISS Long Island Sound Study LWRP Local Waterfront Revitalization Program MTBE methyl tert butyl ether NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration NOAA National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration NPS National Park Service NWI National Wetland Inventory NYSDEC New York State Department of Environmental Conservation NYSDOS New York State Department of State OMWM Open Marsh Water Management PEP Peconic Estuary Program SCDHS Suffolk County Department of Health Services SCVC Suffolk County Department of Public Works, Division of Vector Control SSER South Shore Estuary Reserve TNC The Nature Conservancy TWA Tidal Wetlands Act ULV ultra low volume USEPA US Environmental Protection Agency USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Services USGS United States Geological Survey Cashin Associates, PC vi Suffolk County Vector Control and Wetlands Management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • INVENTORY of Tpf Larrier ISLAND CHAIN of the STATES of NEW YORK and NEW JERSEY
    B250B50 SCH INVENTORY OF TPf lARRIER ISLAND CHAIN OF THE STATES OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY PREPARED UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE FUNDED BY THE MC INTOSH FOUNDATION Pr OCL 13;.2 B5D 5ch INVENTORY OF THE BARRIER ISLAND CHAIN OF THE STATES OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY JAMES J, SCHEINKMANJ RESEARCHER PETER M. BYRNEJ CARTOGRAPHER ,, I PREPARED UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE J OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE 45 Rockefeller Plaza Room 2350 New York, N.Y. 10020 FUNDED BY THE MC INTOSH FOUNDATION October, 1977 I r- I,,' N.J~...; OCZ[VJ dbrary We wish to thank John R. Robinson, 150 Purchase Street, Rye, New York 10580, for his help and guidance and for the use of his office facilities in the prepara­ tion of this report. Copyright © The Mcintosh Foundation 1977 All rights reserved. Except for use in a review, the reproduction or utilization of this work in any form or by any electronic, mech­ anical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including xerography, photocopying, and recording, and in any information stor­ age and retrieval system is forbidden without the written permission of the publisher. TABLE OE' CONTENTS Page Number Preface iv New York Barrier Island Chain: Introduction to the New York Barrier Island Chain NY- 2 Barrier Island (Unnamed) NY- 5 Fire Island NY-10 Jones Beach Island NY-16 Long Beach Island NY-20 Background Information for Nassau County NY-24 Background Information for Suffolk County NY-25 New Jersey Barrier Island Chain: Introduction to the New Jersey Barrier Island Chain NJ- 2 Sandy Hook Peninsula NJ- 5 Barnegat
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Island—Historical Background
    Chapter 1 Fire Island—Historical Background Brief Overview of Fire Island History Fire Island has been the location for a wide variety of historical events integral to the development of the Long Island region and the nation. Much of Fire Island’s history remains shrouded in mystery and fable, including the precise date at which the barrier beach island was formed and the origin of the name “Fire Island.” What documentation does exist, however, tells an interesting tale of Fire Island’s progression from “Shells to Hotels,” a phrase coined by one author to describe the island’s evo- lution from an Indian hotbed of wampum production to a major summer resort in the twentieth century.1 Throughout its history Fire Island has contributed to some of the nation’s most important historical episodes, including the development of the whaling industry, piracy, the slave trade, and rumrunning. More recently Fire Island, home to the Fire Island National Seashore, exemplifies the late twentieth-century’s interest in preserving natural resources and making them available for public use. The Name. It is generally believed that Fire Island received its name from the inlet that cuts through the barrier and connects the Great South Bay to the ocean. The name Fire Island Inlet is seen on maps dating from the nineteenth century before it was attributed to the barrier island. On September 15, 1789, Henry Smith of Boston sold a piece of property to several Brookhaven residents through a deed that stated the property ran from “the Head of Long Cove to Huntting
    [Show full text]
  • Long Island South Shore Estuary Reserve Coordinated Water Resources Monitoring Strategy Long Island SOUTH SHORE ESTUARY RESERVE
    Long Island South Shore Estuary Reserve Coordinated Water Resources Monitoring Strategy New York Suffolk Nassau Long Island SOUTH SHORE ESTUARY RESERVE Open-File Report 2017–1161 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. The Long Island South Shore Estuary Reserve (orange) stretches west to east from the Nassau-Queens county line to the town of Southampton. South to north, it extends from mean high tide on the ocean side of the barrier islands to the inland limits of the watersheds that drain into the bays. Image courtesy of the New York State Department of State Office of Planning, Development and Community Infrastructure. Long Island South Shore Estuary Reserve Coordinated Water Resources Monitoring Strategy By Shawn C. Fisher, Robert J. Welk, and Jason S. Finkelstein Prepared in cooperation with the New York State Department of State Office of Planning, Development and Community Infrastructure and the South Shore Estuary Reserve Office Open-File Report 2017–1161 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2018 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Great South Bay Ecosystem-Based Management Plan
    Great South Bay Ecosystem-based Management Plan Prepared by The Nature Conservancy, Long Island Chapter Prepared for The New York State Department of State with funds provided by the Environmental Protection Fund 2008 Draft Final 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Great South Bay (GSB) on the South Shore of Long Island is teeming with life, but it is also degraded compared to historical conditions. Conservation and management measures are needed to preserve and restore the health of the bay. The Long Island Chapter of the Nature Conservancy (TNC), under contract to the New York State Department of State (DOS), developed this Ecosystem-based Management (EBM) Plan for Great South Bay. Ecosystem-based Management is a management approach that considers the entire ecosystem, including humans. It promotes ecosystem viability and integrity, biodiversity, sustainability, and social values and principles. TNC’s analysis relies on choosing a set of ecological surrogates, representative species, and groups of species, or habitat types that can represent the ecological status of the biodiversity in Great South Bay. For each surrogate, specific measurable objectives are developed that describe the intended ecological state of Great South Bay with respect to each surrogate. The measurable objectives are achieved through the implementation of strategic actions and action steps described in the plan. Overarching objectives and strategic actions are also developed to address water quality, global climate change, and education. The surrogates chosen to represent the GSB ecosystem in the plan are: Hard clams Salt marshes Seagrass meadows Barrier island complex Predatory fishes Winter flounder Alewives Piping plovers Horseshoe crabs This report was originally drafted in 2008 followed by an update in 2012 to each surrogate’s current status, strategic actions and action steps.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Appendix D
    Long Island Duck Farm History and Ecosystem Restoration Opportunities Suffolk County, Long Island, New York February 2009 US Army Corps of Engineers Suffolk County, NY New York District APPENDIX D APPENDIX D Duck Farm Industry and Impacts Report prepared by Suffolk County Department of Planning H. Lee Dennison Building - 4th Floor 100 Veterans Memorial Highway P.O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, New York 11788 DeWitt S. Davies, Ph.D. Chief Environmental Analyst Duck Farm Industry Impacts on the Environment Introduction As documented in the historical overview section, the duck farm industry in Suffolk County was an extremely intensive land use along stream and bay shorelines. Inventory work by the Department of Planning indicates that approximately 2,000 acres of upland property and almost 20 miles of shoreline along freshwater creeks/rivers and estuary tributaries – primarily in the Towns of Brookhaven, Riverhead and Southampton – were utilized during the last century in Suffolk County for duck production. The impacts of duck farming were dramatic, both on-site and off-site. Extensive landform alterations were made to construct animal pens, feed lots and swim ponds, which were often located in or directly adjacent to streams/coves of the bays. Waste effluent discharges from the farms created thick organic matter deposits, degraded water quality and altered phytoplankton and benthic population in near-by surface waters. Duck Farms – An Intensive Land Use The significance of the impacts is reflected by the magnitude of the industry and the waste load generated. Effluent waste loadings from the farms in the form of suspended solids, nutrients and coliform bacteria were huge, especially prior to the required use of treatment technology under water pollution control laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking Through
    Photo courtesy of George Proios Breaking Through Nothing is more constant than in business and municipal practices that change itself… may have led to a decline in commercial shellfish populations. And nowhere can this be demonstrated more graphically than along Long Island’s barrier Looking long-term at the effects that beaches where the dynamic interactions future breaches along barrier beaches between shifting sands and crashing ocean might have on these estuarine ecosys- waves constantly reshape the thin strands of tems, New York Sea Grant has funded beach and periodically form new inlets. When four novel research projects. Each has new inlets form, salty water from the ocean a different approach and thus provides a enters the calmer, shallow waters of Long different piece of the puzzle. Island’s south shore estuaries (LISSE), po- Continued on page 4 tentially changing the delicate balance of the estuaries’ ecosystems. In recent decades, Breaking Through page 1 by Patrick Dooley and Barbara A. Branca each of these estuarine ecosystems has Funding Breakthrough Research page 3 by Barbara A. Branca, Patrick Dooley already undergone change due to increased and Lane Smith community development along Long Island’s NYSG a Sounding Board for Governor on Ocean Report page 6 populated south shore coupled with changes by Barbara A. Branca and Jack Mattice Are Marshes Losing Ground? page 7 by Barbara A. Branca CoastWatch: page 8 Great Lakes Student Summit by Paul C. Focazio Botulism Update page 10 by Helen Domske and Lane Smith Currents Stakeholders Set Great Lakes Priorities Paul C. Focazio page 12 Earthstock 2004 by Susan M.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2: Brown Tide Management Plan
    Peconic Estuary Program C H A P T E R TWO BROWN TIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN OBJECTIVES 1) Determine the chemical, physical and biological factors responsible for producing, sustaining and ending blooms of the Brown Tide organism, Aureococcus anophagefferens. 2) Determine what management actions can be undertaken to prevent or, if that is not possible, to mitigate the effects of recurrent Brown Tide blooms on the ecosystem and economy of the Peconics. C H A P T E R T W O 2-1 Peconic Estuary Program CCMP MEASURABLE GOALS The PEP’s measurable goals with respect to Brown Tide blooms include: • Continue to better coordinate, focus, and expand Brown Tide research efforts (measured by funding appropriated, frequency of Brown Tide symposiums, frequency of updating the Brown Tide Workplan and coordinations within the Brown Tide Steering Committee). [See Action B-1] • Continue the current level of water quality sampling in the Peconic Estuary (measured by the number and frequency of samples taken per year and the number of bays and peripheral embayments sampled). Currently, the Suffolk Department of Health Services conducts biweekly monitoring at 32 stations in the Peconic Estuary throughout the year, resulting in over 830 samples taken annually. [See Action B-1] Measurable goals related to natural resources are found in the Habitat and Living Resources Chapter (Chapter 4). C H A P T E R T W O 2-2 Peconic Estuary Program CCMP INTRODUCTION Brown Tide is a marine microalgal bloom. Microalgae, or phytoplankton, are microscopic, single- cell plants that are found in all natural freshwater and marine ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Island Duck Farm History and Ecosystem Restoration Opportunities Suffolk County, Long Island, New York
    Long Island Duck Farm History and Ecosystem Restoration Opportunities Suffolk County, Long Island, New York February 2009 US Army Corps of Engineers Suffolk County, NY New York District Table of Contents Section Page Table of Contents............................................................................................................................ 1 List of Appendices .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Purpose..................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 History of Duck Farming on Long Island................................................................................ 1 4.0 Environmental Impacts ............................................................................................................. 2 4.1 Duck Waste Statistics ....................................................................................................... 2 4.2 Off-site Impacts of Duck Farm Operation........................................................................ 3 4.2.1 Duck Sludge Deposits.................................................................................................... 4 4.3 On-site Impacts of Duck Farm Operation......................................................................... 5 5.0
    [Show full text]
  • Long Island Tidal Wetlands Trends Analysis
    LONG ISLAND TIDAL WETLANDS TRENDS ANALYSIS Prepared for the NEW ENGLAND INTERSTATE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL COMMISSION Prepared by August 2015 Long Island Tidal Wetlands Trends Analysis August 2015 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL CONTEXT ..................................................................................................................... 6 FUNDING SOURCE AND PARTNERS ..................................................................................................................................... 6 TRENDS ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................................................. 7 METHODOLOGY AND DATA ................................................................................................................................... 9 OUTLINE OF TECHNICAL APPROACH ................................................................................................................................... 9 TECHNICAL OBJECTIVES
    [Show full text]
  • Shellfishing Newsletter
    10/24/2018 Shellfishing Newsletter We only use cookies that are necessary for this site to function, and to provide you with the best experience. Learn more in our Cookie Statement. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies. 5 Receive Updates Enter Email Address Go Shellfishing Newsletter The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation sent this bulletin on 10/23/2018 03:05 PM EDT DEC Delivers - Information to keep you connected and informed from the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Share or view as a web page || Update preferences or unsubscribe Shellfishing Newsletter Bay Scallop Season Opens November 5 Bay scallops (Argopecten irradians) are New York’s official state shellfish, and a highly anticipated local seafood option this time of year. They get their name from the shallow waterbodies they’re found in, such as the Peconic, Gardiners and Shinnecock bays here in New York’s marine waters. Shellfish, which include scallops, clams, oysters, and mussels, can be harvested from certified waters in New York year-round, with the exception of bay scallops. Bay scallop season opens on the first Monday of November, which this year is November 5th and closes on March 31st. To retain bay scallops, they must be over 2-¼ inches in length from its mid-hinge to mid-bill and also display an annual growth ring (pictured), which ensures they have been able to reproduce prior to being harvested. Bay scallops have a relatively short life expectancy, averaging about 20-22 months but could live up to 26 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Brown Tidetide —— Anan Overviewoverview
    New York Report #1 March 1998 BROWNBROWN TIDETIDE —— ANAN OVERVIEWOVERVIEW Brown tides are part of growing world-wide incidences of harmful algal blooms (HAB) which are caused by a proliferation of single- celled marine plants called phytoplankton. One species of phytoplankton, the microscopic alga Aureococcus anophagefferens (or-ee-oh-KAHKAH-kus ah-no-fah-JEFJEF-fer-ens) may bloom in such densities that the water turns dark brown, a condition known as “brown tide.” In 1985, severe brown tides were first reported in the Peconic Bays of eastern Long Island, Mass. New York, in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island and possibly in Rhode Barnegat Bay, New Jersey. Since then, brown tide has Island intermittently occurred with variable intensity in Barnegat Bay and in the bays of Long Island. Connecticut New Narragansett York Bay Locations of BROWN TIDE > .50 million cells / ml NJ, NY & RI Peconic Bays > .25 million cells / ml Great South Brown tide has had particularly detrimental effects Bay on the Peconic Bay ecosystem and the economy of eastern Long Island. During intense bloom conditions, densities of the brown tide organism can approach two million cells per milliliter. These numbers far surpass typical New mixed phytoplankton densities of 100 to 100,000 in Jersey that same volume. Eelgrass beds which serve as spawning and nursery grounds for shellfish and finfish may have Barnegat been adversely impacted by decreased light penetration, Bay at least in part, due to brown tide blooms. The Peconic estuary bay scallop industry, at one point worth almost $2 million annually, was virtually eradicated to a dockside value of merely a few thousand dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Island Geographic Scope Jurisdictions
    Ocean Avenue 27A 495 Town of Smithtown 112 TOWN OF ay CENTER xpressw o HOLBROOK Long Island E BROOKHAVEN MORICHES RONKONKOMA Long Island 27 46 F CENTRAL ISLIP MacArthur o r NORTH g e East Moriches Airport LONG ISLAND y PATCHOGUE a R Coast Guard 454 w iv Station Wertheim k e r Lakeland Avenue William Floyd r a Town of Huntington Town Sunrise Highway BRENTWOOD P National Estate Long Island Railroad d Wildlife y Town of Islip of Town o MORICHES BAY l F Town of Babylon Refuge VILLAGE OF m BROOKHAVEN a i l TOWN OF l Sagtikos Parkway Connetquot River PATCHOGUE i State Park 27 VILLAGE W Smith Point MORICHES ISLIP BOHEMIA Patchogue VILLAGE OF Preserve OF County Park Great Gun INLET MASTIC BEACH Y Town of Islip of Town BA Park BELLPORT W Beach Bayard RO Town of Brookhaven of Town BELLPORT R (Town of Brookhaven) Cutting Administration NA BABYLON Patchogue BAY Arboretum Ferry Davis Park Southern State Parkway Terminal Ferry Terminal Long Island Railroad (NPS) John Boyle Island BAYPORT Sayville PATCHOGUE Hospital Island OAKDALE 27A SAYVILLE Sayville BAY Pelican Island Sunrise Highway Islip Fire Island Ferry Terminal Ridge Island EAST ISLIP Wilderness ISLIP WEST VILLAGE OF SAYVILLE Visitor Center BRIGHTWATERS Fire Island NICOLL Old Inlet 27 Ferry Terminal Seatuck National BAY GREAT SOUTH Wildlife Heckscher Bellport Beach BAY SHORE BAY GREAT Refuge State Park (Village of Bellport) COVE WEST ISLIP 27A Montauk Highway Watch Hill Robert Moses Causeway FIRE ISLAND NATIONAL SEASHORE Davis Park Leja Beach P r i v Blue Point Beach (Town of Brookhaven) a t GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN e F e Water Island SOUTH Town of Islip of Islip Town r Town of Babylon r y Town of Brookhaven of Town OYSTER S e r BAY v i c FIGURE 6.0 JURISDICTIONS e Talisman Sunken Fire Island Pines Forest West East Fire Island Fire Island Cherry Grove The National Park Service (NPS) has jurisdiction over all activities in the surface and water column within the park’s boundaries, regardless of land ownership (36 CFR Part 1.2).
    [Show full text]