DOCSLIB.ORG

Town of Southampton Water Protection Plan DRAFT February 2015 Prepared by the Urban Harbors Institute, University of Massachusetts Boston

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Town of Southampton Water Protection Plan DRAFT February 2015 Prepared by the Urban Harbors Institute, University of Massachusetts Boston Town of Southampton Water Protection Plan DRAFT February 2015 Prepared by the Urban Harbors Institute, University of Massachusetts Boston Town of Southampton Water Protection Plan DRAFT February 2015 Prepared on behalf of: Town of Southampton, NY Prepared by: Urban Harbors Institute University of Massachusetts, Boston 100 Morrissey Boulevard Boston, MA 02125 617‐287‐5570 [email protected] Table of Contentsi SOUTHAMPTON WATER PROTECTION PLAN ............................................................ 1 PART ONE: ..................................................................................................................... 1 ACTION PLAN ................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 2 PURPOSE OF THE PLAN ........................................................................................................................ 2 A TOWN, STATE, FEDERAL PARTNERSHIP ......................................................................................... 3 CONTENT OF THE PLAN ......................................................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1: PROPOSED BOUNDARY .......................................................................... 7 BOUNDARY PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................ 7 CRITERIA FOR BOUNDARY DELINEATION ......................................................................................... 10 BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................. 13 A PROPOSED BOUNDARY .................................................................................................................. 15 SECTION 2: LOCAL POLICIES AND IMPLEMENTATION TECHNIQUES .................. 22 DEVELOPMENT AND LAND USE .......................................................................................................... 24 HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES ........................................................................................... 34 SCENIC RESOURCES ........................................................................................................................... 46 FLOODING, EROSION, AND SEA LEVEL RISE ................................................................................... 55 WATER QUALITY ................................................................................................................................... 70 ECOSYSTEM AND NATURAL RESOURCES........................................................................................ 93 AIR QUALITY ........................................................................................................................................ 108 SOLID WASTE AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AND WASTE ..................................................... 111 PUBLIC ACCESS AND RECREATION ................................................................................................ 114 WATER-DEPENDENT USES AND THE SUSTAINABLE USE OF LIVING MARINE RESOURCES .. 122 AGRICULTURE ..................................................................................................................................... 136 ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES .............................................................................................. 142 SECTION 3: PROPOSED LOCAL CONSISTENCY LAW ........................................... 145 SOUTHAMPTON CONSISTENCY REVIEW LAW ............................................................................... 145 SECTION 4: ................................................................................................................ 154 GUIDELINES FOR NOTIFICATION AND REVIEW .............................................................................. 154 PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES FOR COORDINATING NYS DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) AND LWRP CONSISTENCY REVIEW OF FEDERAL AGENCY ACTIONS ................................................. 157 SECTION 5: A SUMMARY OF STATE AND FEDERAL ACTIONS LIKELY TO AFFECT PLAN IMPLEMENTA-TION ......................................................................................... 161 STATE AND FEDERAL ACTIONS LIKELY TO AFFECT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION.......................... 162 DRAFT Southampton Water Protection Plan: Part 1 i PART TWO: BACKGROUND & SUPPORTING MATERIAL ....................................... 183 INVENTORY OF RESOURCES AND ANALYSIS OF ISSUES ................................... 184 INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS: A SUMMARY ...................................................................................... 184 DEVELOPMENT AND LAND USE ........................................................................................................ 186 HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES ......................................................................................... 193 SCENIC RESOURCES ......................................................................................................................... 200 FLOODING, EROSION, AND SEA LEVEL RISE ................................................................................. 212 WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY ..................................................................................................... 221 ECOSYSTEM AND NATURAL RESOURCES...................................................................................... 234 PUBLIC ACCESS AND RECREATION ................................................................................................ 247 WATER DEPENDENT USES AND THE SUSTAINABLE USE OF LIVING MARINE RESOURCES .. 252 AGRICULTURE ..................................................................................................................................... 266 WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES .................................................... 268 WATERSHED OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................... 270 WATER QUALITY ISSUES ................................................................................................................... 273 HARBOR PLANS ........................................................................................................ 291 JURISDICTION AND MANAGING AUTHORITIES: .............................................................................. 291 SOUTHAMPTON HARBOR MANAGEMENT AUTHORITIES .............................................................. 292 MANAGEMENT OF THE HARBORS IN THE TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON ....................................... 293 HARBOR PLANS FOR INDIVIDUAL EMBAYMENTS .......................................................................... 293 REEVES BAY ........................................................................................................................................ 295 FLANDERS BAY ................................................................................................................................... 300 GREAT PECONIC BAY ......................................................................................................................... 302 LITTLE PECONIC BAY ......................................................................................................................... 311 NOYAC BAY .......................................................................................................................................... 319 SAG HARBOR ....................................................................................................................................... 326 MORICHES BAY ................................................................................................................................... 327 QUANTUCK BAY .................................................................................................................................. 333 SHINNECOCK BAY .............................................................................................................................. 338 SHINNECOCK CANAL .......................................................................................................................... 347 MECOX BAY ......................................................................................................................................... 351 SAGAPONACK LAKE ........................................................................................................................... 356 DRAFT Southampton Water Protection Plan: Part 1 ii List of Figures Figure 1: Southampton Water Protection Boundary 8 Figure 2: New York Coastal Management Program Boundary 11 Figure 3: Major Surface Watersheds 16 Figure 4: Surface Watersheds 17 Figure 5: Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats 18 Figure 6: New Atlantic Ecological Marine Units 19 Figure 7: Agricultural Lands 20 Figure 8: Land Use 25 Figure 9: Land Cover from 2006 National Land Cover Database 26 Figure 10: Zoning 27 Figure 11: Hardened Shorelines on the South Shore 57 Figure 12: FEMA Flood Zones & SLOSH Zones 59 Figure 13: Major Surface Watersheds (A larger version of this map is available in Figure 3.) 71 Figure 14: Surface Watersheds (A larger version of this map is available in Figure 4.) 71 Figure 15: Land Use 187 Figure 16: Land Cover from 2006 National Land Cover Database 188 Figure 17: Zoning 191 Figure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hamble River Logboat: Report on Recent Investigation by HWTMA
    Hamble River Logboat: Report on Recent Investigation by HWTMA Hampshire and Wight Trust for Maritime Archaeology September 2010 Hamble River Logboat Study Report Contents I. DOCUMENT CONTROL ........................................................................................................... 1 II. LIST OF FIGURES & TABLES .................................................................................................. 1 III. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS......................................................................................................... 2 1. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 PROJECT AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................ 2 1.2 THE RIVER HAMBLE ........................................................................................................... 2 1.3 HISTORY OF THE HAMBLE LOGBOAT ................................................................................... 2 1.4 THE HAMBLE LOGBOAT TODAY............................................................................................ 5 2. INVESTIGATION OF THE HAMBLE LOGBOAT................................................................. 6 2.1 DENDRO-CHRONOLOGY (BY NIGEL NAYLING)...................................................................... 6 3. ANALYSIS OF THE HAMBLE LOGBOAT........................................................................... 7 3.1 CONTEXT .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Long Island South Shore Estuary Reserve Coordinated Water Resources Monitoring Strategy Long Island SOUTH SHORE ESTUARY RESERVE
    Long Island South Shore Estuary Reserve Coordinated Water Resources Monitoring Strategy New York Suffolk Nassau Long Island SOUTH SHORE ESTUARY RESERVE Open-File Report 2017–1161 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. The Long Island South Shore Estuary Reserve (orange) stretches west to east from the Nassau-Queens county line to the town of Southampton. South to north, it extends from mean high tide on the ocean side of the barrier islands to the inland limits of the watersheds that drain into the bays. Image courtesy of the New York State Department of State Office of Planning, Development and Community Infrastructure. Long Island South Shore Estuary Reserve Coordinated Water Resources Monitoring Strategy By Shawn C. Fisher, Robert J. Welk, and Jason S. Finkelstein Prepared in cooperation with the New York State Department of State Office of Planning, Development and Community Infrastructure and the South Shore Estuary Reserve Office Open-File Report 2017–1161 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2018 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Great South Bay Ecosystem-Based Management Plan
    Great South Bay Ecosystem-based Management Plan Prepared by The Nature Conservancy, Long Island Chapter Prepared for The New York State Department of State with funds provided by the Environmental Protection Fund 2008 Draft Final 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Great South Bay (GSB) on the South Shore of Long Island is teeming with life, but it is also degraded compared to historical conditions. Conservation and management measures are needed to preserve and restore the health of the bay. The Long Island Chapter of the Nature Conservancy (TNC), under contract to the New York State Department of State (DOS), developed this Ecosystem-based Management (EBM) Plan for Great South Bay. Ecosystem-based Management is a management approach that considers the entire ecosystem, including humans. It promotes ecosystem viability and integrity, biodiversity, sustainability, and social values and principles. TNC’s analysis relies on choosing a set of ecological surrogates, representative species, and groups of species, or habitat types that can represent the ecological status of the biodiversity in Great South Bay. For each surrogate, specific measurable objectives are developed that describe the intended ecological state of Great South Bay with respect to each surrogate. The measurable objectives are achieved through the implementation of strategic actions and action steps described in the plan. Overarching objectives and strategic actions are also developed to address water quality, global climate change, and education. The surrogates chosen to represent the GSB ecosystem in the plan are: Hard clams Salt marshes Seagrass meadows Barrier island complex Predatory fishes Winter flounder Alewives Piping plovers Horseshoe crabs This report was originally drafted in 2008 followed by an update in 2012 to each surrogate’s current status, strategic actions and action steps.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Appendix D
    Long Island Duck Farm History and Ecosystem Restoration Opportunities Suffolk County, Long Island, New York February 2009 US Army Corps of Engineers Suffolk County, NY New York District APPENDIX D APPENDIX D Duck Farm Industry and Impacts Report prepared by Suffolk County Department of Planning H. Lee Dennison Building - 4th Floor 100 Veterans Memorial Highway P.O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, New York 11788 DeWitt S. Davies, Ph.D. Chief Environmental Analyst Duck Farm Industry Impacts on the Environment Introduction As documented in the historical overview section, the duck farm industry in Suffolk County was an extremely intensive land use along stream and bay shorelines. Inventory work by the Department of Planning indicates that approximately 2,000 acres of upland property and almost 20 miles of shoreline along freshwater creeks/rivers and estuary tributaries – primarily in the Towns of Brookhaven, Riverhead and Southampton – were utilized during the last century in Suffolk County for duck production. The impacts of duck farming were dramatic, both on-site and off-site. Extensive landform alterations were made to construct animal pens, feed lots and swim ponds, which were often located in or directly adjacent to streams/coves of the bays. Waste effluent discharges from the farms created thick organic matter deposits, degraded water quality and altered phytoplankton and benthic population in near-by surface waters. Duck Farms – An Intensive Land Use The significance of the impacts is reflected by the magnitude of the industry and the waste load generated. Effluent waste loadings from the farms in the form of suspended solids, nutrients and coliform bacteria were huge, especially prior to the required use of treatment technology under water pollution control laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking Through
    Photo courtesy of George Proios Breaking Through Nothing is more constant than in business and municipal practices that change itself… may have led to a decline in commercial shellfish populations. And nowhere can this be demonstrated more graphically than along Long Island’s barrier Looking long-term at the effects that beaches where the dynamic interactions future breaches along barrier beaches between shifting sands and crashing ocean might have on these estuarine ecosys- waves constantly reshape the thin strands of tems, New York Sea Grant has funded beach and periodically form new inlets. When four novel research projects. Each has new inlets form, salty water from the ocean a different approach and thus provides a enters the calmer, shallow waters of Long different piece of the puzzle. Island’s south shore estuaries (LISSE), po- Continued on page 4 tentially changing the delicate balance of the estuaries’ ecosystems. In recent decades, Breaking Through page 1 by Patrick Dooley and Barbara A. Branca each of these estuarine ecosystems has Funding Breakthrough Research page 3 by Barbara A. Branca, Patrick Dooley already undergone change due to increased and Lane Smith community development along Long Island’s NYSG a Sounding Board for Governor on Ocean Report page 6 populated south shore coupled with changes by Barbara A. Branca and Jack Mattice Are Marshes Losing Ground? page 7 by Barbara A. Branca CoastWatch: page 8 Great Lakes Student Summit by Paul C. Focazio Botulism Update page 10 by Helen Domske and Lane Smith Currents Stakeholders Set Great Lakes Priorities Paul C. Focazio page 12 Earthstock 2004 by Susan M.
    [Show full text]
  • Abbots Worthy Fishery River Itchen, Hampshire
    Abbots Worthy Fishery River Itchen, Hampshire Abbots Worthy Fishery River Itchen, Hampshire Winchester 3 miles (London Waterloo 57 mins), Alresford 6 miles and Stockbridge 10 miles. Syndicate membership for the Abbots Worthy beat on the Itchen Introduction The River Itchen is considered to be one of the finest English chalk streams by anglers worldwide. Rising from the Hampshire chalk downland near New Cheriton, the river has a reported catchment area of 280 miles from its source where it is known as the Titchbourne Stream. The river is approximately 28 miles long and flows north to New Alresford where it is joined by two spring fed streams, the Erle and the Candover Brook, becoming the River Itchen flowing west past Ovington and Itchen Abbot, east to Abbots Worthy and south to Winchester and Southampton where the river becomes tidal and joins the reaches of the River Test on Southampton Water. The river is highly sought after for its quality of water and fly fishing and almost completely wild trout population. Situation The Abbots Worthy beat on the Upper Itchen is located on the edge of the village of Abbots Worthy approximately 3 miles to the north of the cathedral city of Winchester. Within Abbots Worthy and the adjacent Kings Worthy there are everyday conveniences including shops, post office and public house. Winchester provides a comprehensive range of shops, cultural and recreational facilities and a wide choice of restaurants and wine bars. Travel and communications are excellent with the A33, A34 and M3 adjacent giving access to both London and the south coast, Oxford, the north and the A303 for the west country.
    [Show full text]
  • SANITARY SURVEY REPORT the Solent 2013
    EC Regulation 854/2004 CLASSIFICATION OF BIVALVE MOLLUSC PRODUCTION AREAS IN ENGLAND AND WALES SANITARY SURVEY REPORT The Solent 2013 SANITARY SURVEY REPORT SOLENT Cover photo: Oyster sampling in the Solent CONTACTS: For enquires relating to this report or For enquires relating to policy matters on further information on the the implementation of sanitary surveys in implementation of sanitary surveys in England: England and Wales: Simon Kershaw Beverley Küster Food Safety Group Hygiene Delivery Branch Cefas Weymouth Laboratory Enforcement and Delivery Division Barrack Road, Food Standards Agency The Nothe Aviation House Weymouth 125 Kingsway Dorset London DT43 8UB WC2B 6NH +44 (0) 1305 206600 +44 (0) 20 7276 8000 [email protected] [email protected] © Crown copyright, 2013. Native oysters and other bivalve species in the Solent 2 SANITARY SURVEY REPORT SOLENT STATEMENT OF USE: This report provides a sanitary survey for bivalve molluscs in the Solent, as required under EC Regulation 854/2004. It provides an appropriate hygiene classification zoning and monitoring plan based on the best available information with detailed supporting evidence. The Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (Cefas) undertook this work on behalf of the Food Standards Agency (FSA). CONSULTATION: Consultee Date of consultation Date of response Environment Agency 19/04/2013 - Isle of Wight Council 19/04/2013 - New Forest District Council 19/04/2013 - Portsmouth Port Health 19/04/2013 - Southampton Port Health 19/04/2013 - Southern IFCA 19/04/2013 21/05/2013 Southern Water 19/04/2013 - RECOMMENDED BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE: Cefas, 2013. Sanitary survey of the Solent. Cefas report on behalf of the Food Standards Agency, to demonstrate compliance with the requirements for classification of bivalve mollusc production areas in England and Wales under of EC Regulation No.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2: Brown Tide Management Plan
    Peconic Estuary Program C H A P T E R TWO BROWN TIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN OBJECTIVES 1) Determine the chemical, physical and biological factors responsible for producing, sustaining and ending blooms of the Brown Tide organism, Aureococcus anophagefferens. 2) Determine what management actions can be undertaken to prevent or, if that is not possible, to mitigate the effects of recurrent Brown Tide blooms on the ecosystem and economy of the Peconics. C H A P T E R T W O 2-1 Peconic Estuary Program CCMP MEASURABLE GOALS The PEP’s measurable goals with respect to Brown Tide blooms include: • Continue to better coordinate, focus, and expand Brown Tide research efforts (measured by funding appropriated, frequency of Brown Tide symposiums, frequency of updating the Brown Tide Workplan and coordinations within the Brown Tide Steering Committee). [See Action B-1] • Continue the current level of water quality sampling in the Peconic Estuary (measured by the number and frequency of samples taken per year and the number of bays and peripheral embayments sampled). Currently, the Suffolk Department of Health Services conducts biweekly monitoring at 32 stations in the Peconic Estuary throughout the year, resulting in over 830 samples taken annually. [See Action B-1] Measurable goals related to natural resources are found in the Habitat and Living Resources Chapter (Chapter 4). C H A P T E R T W O 2-2 Peconic Estuary Program CCMP INTRODUCTION Brown Tide is a marine microalgal bloom. Microalgae, or phytoplankton, are microscopic, single- cell plants that are found in all natural freshwater and marine ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Evidence Net Fishing Management for Estuaries, Harbours and Piers in Dorset, Hampshire and the Isle of Wight
    Supporting Evidence Net Fishing Management for Estuaries, Harbours and Piers in Dorset, Hampshire and the Isle of Wight Annex I: Table of Proposed Net Management Areas Annex II: Existing Measures Annex III: Net Management Area Selection Evidence Annex IV: Temporal Salmonid Migration Annex I – Table of Proposed Net Management Areas 21 No. Area Map Management proposal Timing 1. Chichester Harbour 1 No additional net use closure - 2. Langstone Harbour: Bridge 1 Closure to all net use, except ring nets All year Lake and associated rivers 3. Langstone Harbour: all areas 1 No additional net use closure - excluding Bridge Lake 4. Portsmouth Harbour: Fareham 1 Closure to all net use, except ring nets All year Creek and River Wallington 5. Portsmouth Harbour: all areas 1 No additional net use closure - excluding Fareham Creek 6. Southsea Pier 1 Closure to all net use within 100 All year metres of pier structure 7. River Meon 2 Closure to all net use, except ring nets All year 8. Rivers Test, Itchen and 2 Closure to all net use, except ring nets All year Hamble 9. Southampton Water – Dock 2 Closure to all net use within 3 metres All year Head to Calshot of the surface, except ring nets 10. Lymington River 4 Closure to all net use, except ring nets All year 11. Keyhaven 4 Closure to all net use, except ring nets All year 12. Sandown Pier 3 Closure to all net use within 100 All year metres of pier structure 13. Bembridge Harbour and River 3 Closure to all net use, except ring nets All year Yar (eastern) 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment for the Fareham Borough Local Plan 2037
    Habitats Regulations Assessment for the Fareham Borough Local Plan 2037 Screening and Appropriate Assessment Report for the Publication Plan September 2020 Habitats Regulations Assessment for the Fareham Borough Local Plan 2037 Screening and Appropriate Assessment Report for the Publication Plan Client: Fareham Borough Council Report No.: UE0192 HRA- Fareham Publication Plan_3_200921 Author: Proofed: Approved: Giulia Civello BSc(Hons) MSc PIEMA Nick Pincombe BA(Hons) MSc CEnv Nick Pincombe BA(Hons) MSc CEnv Nick Pincombe BA(Hons) MSc CEnv MIEMA MCIEEM MIEMA MCIEEM MIEMA MCIEEM Revision No.: Status/Comment: Date: 0 Draft for comment 4 August 2020 1 Final draft 12 August 2020 2 Final 16 September 2020 3 Revised final 22 September 2020 HRA for the Fareham Local Plan 2037: Screening & Appropriate Assessment Report for the Publication Plan September 2020 UE0192 HRA- Fareham Publication Plan_3_200921 Contents 0 Executive Summary i 0.1 Introduction i 0.2 Scope of the Assessment i 0.3 Impact Pathways ii 0.4 Summary of Findings ii 0.5 Conclusions iii 0.6 Consultation Arrangements iii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of this Report 1 1.2 The Fareham Borough Local Plan 2037 1 1.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment 2 1.4 Scope and Structure of this Document 2 2 Methodology 3 2.1 Good Practice Guidance 3 2.2 Screening 4 2.3 Appropriate Assessment 5 2.4 Counteracting Measures 6 2.5 In Combination Effects 7 3 European Sites 9 3.1 Scope of the Assessment 9 3.2 Conservation Objectives for SAC and SPA 10 3.3 Conservation Objectives for Ramsar Sites 21 3.4 Condition
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southampton
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF NATURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ocean and Earth Science Population structure and ecology of wild Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg, 1793) on the south coast of England by Stephanie Rachael Anne Mills Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2016 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF NATURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ocean and Earth Science Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Population structure and ecology of wild Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg, 1793) on the south coast of England By Stephanie Rachael Anne Mills Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg, 1793) is native to Japan and Korea, but has achieved global distribution through human mediated dispersal pathways and natural larval dispersal. Considerable variation in recruitment to wild aggregations has been seen regionally across the globe. Wild recruitment of C. gigas in England has increased in frequency since the millennia however a detailed understanding of their occurrence is limited to an area within the Thames estuary. There have been no English studies to date that reveal how C. gigas interacts with recipient ecosystems, or what impacts winter conditions have. Furthermore conclusive evidence has yet to be presented that feral C. gigas in England are self-sustaining. Intertidal surveys found substrate type and shore height to have the greatest impact on the locality and abundance of C. gigas recruitment. Gametogenesis initiated in C. gigas when water temperatures increased above 9.5 °C. Maturity was generally reached in the summer, however spawning differed between locations. Wild, intertidal C. gigas were found to spawn twice in a single reproductive season. Initially, spawning was triggered through tidally induced temperature shocking as water temperatures increased above 18 °C.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Island Tidal Wetlands Trends Analysis
    LONG ISLAND TIDAL WETLANDS TRENDS ANALYSIS Prepared for the NEW ENGLAND INTERSTATE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL COMMISSION Prepared by August 2015 Long Island Tidal Wetlands Trends Analysis August 2015 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL CONTEXT ..................................................................................................................... 6 FUNDING SOURCE AND PARTNERS ..................................................................................................................................... 6 TRENDS ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................................................. 7 METHODOLOGY AND DATA ................................................................................................................................... 9 OUTLINE OF TECHNICAL APPROACH ................................................................................................................................... 9 TECHNICAL OBJECTIVES
    [Show full text]