DOCSLIB.ORG

Shelter Island Revisited in This Issue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shelter Island Revisited in This Issue HistoryNEWSLETTER Physics A FORUM OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICALof SOCIETY • VOLUME XI • NO. 4 • SPRING 2011 2011 Pais Prize Lecture: Shelter Island Revisited By Silvan S. Schweber he Shelter Island Conference on Quantum Mechanics was a landmark. It was the first of three small post- World War II conferences on theoretical physics spon- Tsored by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS). The first took place June 2–4, 1947, at the Ram’s Head Inn on Shelter Island at the tip of Long Island. The second, the Pocono Conference, was held from March 30 to April 2, 1948, and the third, Oldstone, occurred April 11–14, 1949. The initial impetus for the Shelter Island Conference came from Duncan MacInnes, a distinguished physical chemist at the Rockefeller Institute, who had suggested to Frank Jewett, then president of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), that it sponsor a series of small conferences. The participants (see Fig. 1) were primarily theoretical physicists, most of whom had been leaders at the highly successful wartime laboratories: the MIT Radiation Laboratory, Chicago Metallurgical Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Applied Phys- ics Laboratory, and Los Alamos. Also in attendance were several experimental physicists including Willis Lamb and Fig. 1. Assembled attendees of the June 1947 Shelter Island Conference Isidor Rabi, who reported on experiments on the spectrum on Quantum Mechanics. Left to right: Isidor Rabi, Linus Pauling, of hydrogen that had been recently performed at Columbia John Van Vleck, Willis Lamb, Gregory Breit, Duncan MacInnes, University, and Bruno Rossi who reported on the results of Karl Darrow, George Uhlenbeck, Julian Schwinger, Edward Teller, researches carried out in Rome on the atmospheric absorp- Bruno Rossi, Arnold Nordsieck, John von Neumann, John Wheeler, tion of cosmic rays. Hans Bethe, Robert Serber, Robert Marshak, Abraham Pais, Robert The significance of the conference was soon as evident Oppenheimer, David Bohm, Richard Feynman, Victor Weisskopf, to the participants as it is now in retrospect. Six months Herman Feshbach. Not included here is Hendrik Kramers. Photograph later, in January of 1948, APS secretary Darrow wrote his courtesy of AIP Emilio Segrè Visual Archives, Marshak Collection. fellow organizer Duncan MacInnes a brief postcard stating, “I must quote [you] . the words of warm commendation used yesterday by I. I. Rabi about your Shelter Island meet- ing—he said that it has proved much more important than it In This Issue seemed even at the time, and would be remembered as the 1911 Solvay Congress is remembered, for having been the Shelter Island Revisited 1 starting-point of remarkable new developments.” Similarly, Richard Feynman many years later recalled, “There have been many conferences in the world since, but I’ve never felt Editor’s Corner 2 any to be as important as this.” The meeting turned out to be the most seminal confer- History of Superconductivity 4 ence held right after the end of World War II; its impact was indeed comparable to that of the Solvay Congress of 1911. Just as that meeting set the stage for all the subse- John Van Vleck 6 quent developments in quantum theory, similarly Shelter Island provided the initial stimulus for the post-World New Books of Note 12 Continues on page 8 Editors’ Corner Having your house suddenly annihi- lated by a tornado imposes a Janus-like predicament, where you find yourself looking backwards and forward simultane- ously. New beginnings can be good. Rhonda always wanted to design her own house, and now she can do so. But looking back forms an indelible part of the experience. Although a tornado makes history, history lost must be counted among its casualties. Before going there, let me return to the tor- nado itself. The May 24 tornado that honored us with its impersonal visit cut a 65-mile swath across central Oklahoma (the English units stick in the mind from local weather reports). Its rain-wrapped, half-mile-diameter main vortex evidently carried within it at least four tighter vortices. We have reason to think that one of them passed through our Fig. 1. My house (transformed into a high-entropy state) on May 24, 2011. I needed to clean out den and dining room. That part of the house that garage anyway. (Photo by Mark Winslow, of the SNU Physics Department) was cleaned off down to the slab; the rest of the structure collapsed into a pile of twisted he Spring 2011 issue of the FHP rubble. Our roof, doors, appliances, sofas, Newsletter was unfortunately and dining room table were nowhere to be delayed due to inclement weather. found, not even as fragments. Tornadoes TOn May 24, in a spectacularly violent dis- famously produce bizarre effects—your The Forum on History of Physics of play of non-equilibrium thermodynamics refrigerator vanishes but you find the tiny the American Physical Society pub- in a nonlinear system, an EF5 tornado col- wheel of a toy car. We have done the experi- lishes this Newsletter biannually at lided with our house, and the houses of our ment, and can affirm that, for objects having http://www.aps.org/units/fhp/newslet- neighbors (see Fig. 1). large surfaces, the integral of PdA trumps mg ters/index.cfm. If you wish to receive My priorities suddenly changed. Thank- when the wind slams into your house at 300 a printed version of the Newsletter, fully, former Editor Michael Riordan, and mph. I wish that high-speed cameras, like please contact the editor. Each 3-year the recently appointed next Editor Robert those used in the nuclear weapons tests of volume consists of six issues. Crease, approached me through an email the 1950s, had been mounted throughout message aptly entitled “Your Plight,” and the house. It would have been interesting The articles in this issue represent the offered to steer the Spring 2011 issue to to see how our Silverado ended up on top views of their authors and are not completion. Their thoughtful initiative of the Highlander. Most of the vehicles on necessarily those of the Forum or APS. solved a pressing logistical dilemma for me, our street landed in a wheat field half a mile Editor and foreshadowed a flood of thoughtfulness from where they had been parked, folded Dwight E. Neuenschwander to come. into a right angle or rolled into a ball with Department of Physics I am not writing this to elicit sympathy wheels sticking out. When the tornado Southern Nazarene University —we are going to be fine—but to express hit, we were on our way home but were Bethany, OK 73008 gratitude. Within hours of this event and turned back twice by the police. Had we [email protected] ever since, my wife Rhonda and I have been at home we would not have survived. (405) 491-6361 received e-mails, telephone calls, and letters Our new house will have an underground from friends and colleagues. I wish to take shelter. Assuming that one can dash into a this opportunity to express our gratitude neighbor’s shelter now seems too uncertain Associate Editor and appreciation to the Forum on History a strategy. We are thankful to still be among Don Lemons of Physics members who sent messages the living. We can still look forward to seeing Department of Physics of concern, and offered various means of our grandchildren grow up. Bethel College helping us through this challenging time. Not everyone was so fortunate. North Newton, KS 67117 Throughout this experience we found a Although no person on our street perished, [email protected] force stronger than a mere EF5 tornado: the this particular twister killed ten people in Book Review Editor care and concern of so many kind and gener- Oklahoma that day. On our street eight Michael Riordan ous people. We have so much for which to horses lost their lives, including our own [email protected] be grateful. dear Annie, my wife’s equine companion 2 Volume XI, No. 4 • Spring 2011 • History of Physics Newsletter that, hanging in my shop, it was more than a rickety old chair: it was a tribute to Great- Grandpa Ed’s rascally sense of humor. That wobbly green wooden chair is now gone. Telling my grandchildren about their col- orful, ornery, fun-loving great-great-great grandpa became more difficult after May 24. When an artifact has vanished, the tell- ing of the story is diminished. One cannot save everything, but one must save some things, for history. Seeing with you own eyes Galileo’s telescope or Marie Curie’s letters, Albert Einstein’s pipe or one of Niels Bohr’s notebooks, brings the story (and the phys- Fig. 2. Your outgoing editor hard at work a few days after May 24. (Photo by Daryl Cox of the ics) to life. The real thing has no substitute. SNU Chemistry Department) It came up with us. The stories of the people and places for eleven years. Our two weenie dogs, sewing clothes. She also knows the story of behind the physics are more complicat- Heidi and Maggie, amazingly survived how in 1956 her mother made her wedding ed than the body of physics knowledge unscathed. Their steel wire kennel was dress, with her mother’s help, on this very itself, forming incredibly complex webs of found wedged between two heavy pieces machine. The memory of Grandma Coatney relationships that stretch across time and of furniture buried beneath rubble at the far and those events are held within its cabinet. cultures. But without its stories, physics end of the house. They were probably the A creation myth of the pueblo-dwelling becomes homeless, and loses its identity.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Charles Hard Townes (1915–2015)
    ARTICLE-IN-A-BOX Charles Hard Townes (1915–2015) C H Townes shared the Nobel Prize in 1964 for the concept of the laser and the earlier realization of the concept at microwave frequencies, called the maser. He passed away in January of this year, six months short of his hundredth birthday. A cursory look at the archives shows a paper as late as 2011 – ‘The Dust Distribution Immediately Surrounding V Hydrae’, a contribution to infrared astronomy. To get a feel for the range in time and field, his 1936 masters thesis was based on repairing a non-functional van de Graaf accelerator at Duke University in 1936! For his PhD at the California Institute of Technology, he measured the spin of the nucleus of carbon-13 using isotope separation and high resolution spectroscopy. Smythe, his thesis supervisor was writing a comprehensive text on electromagnetism, and Townes solved every problem in it – it must have stood him in good stead in what followed. In 1939, even a star student like him did not get an academic job. The industrial job he took set him on his lifetime course. This was at the legendary Bell Telephone Laboratories, the research wing of AT&T, the company which set up and ran the first – and then the best – telephone system in the world. He was initially given a lot of freedom to work with different research groups. During the Second World War, he worked in a group developing a radar based system for guiding bombs. But his goal was always physics research. After the War, Bell Labs, somewhat reluctantly, let him pursue microwave spectroscopy, on the basis of a technical report he wrote suggesting that molecules might serve as circuit elements at high frequencies which were important for communication.
    [Show full text]
  • NMD, National Security Issues Featured at 2001 April Meeting In
    April 2001 NEWS Volume 10, No. 4 A Publication of The American Physical Society http://www.aps.org/apsnews NMD, National Security Issues Featured Phase I CPU Report to be at 2001 April Meeting in Washington Discussed at Attendees of the 2001 APS April include a talk on how the news me- Meeting, which returns to Wash- dia cover science by David April Meeting ington, DC, this year, should arrive Kestenbaum, a self-described “es- The first phase of a new Na- just in time to catch the last of the caped physicist who is hiding out tional Research Council report of cherry blossom season in between at National Public Radio,” and a lec- the Committee on the Physics of scheduled sessions and special ture on entangled photons for the Universe (CPU) will be the events. The conference will run quantum information by the Uni- topic of discussion during a spe- April 28 through May 1, and will versity of Illinois’ Paul Kwiat. Other cial Sunday evening session at the feature the latest results in nuclear scheduled topics include imaging APS April Meeting in Washing- physics, astrophysics, chemical the cosmic background wave back- ton, DC. The session is intended physics, particles and fields, com- ground, searching for extra to begin the process of collect- putational physics, plasma physics, dimensions, CP violation in B me- ing input from the scientific the physics of beams, and physics sons, neutrino oscillations, and the community on some of the is- history, among other subdisci- amplification of atoms and light in The White House and (inset) some of its famous fictional sues outlined in the draft report, plines.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel Goudsmit
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES SAMUEL ABRAHAM GOUDSMIT 1 9 0 2 — 1 9 7 8 A Biographical Memoir by BENJAMIN BEDERSON Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 2008 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON, D.C. Photograph courtesy Brookhaven National Laboratory. SAMUEL ABRAHAM GOUDSMIT July 11, 1902–December 4, 1978 BY BENJAMIN BEDERSON AM GOUDSMIT LED A CAREER that touched many aspects of S20th-century physics and its impact on society. He started his professional life in Holland during the earliest days of quantum mechanics as a student of Paul Ehrenfest. In 1925 together with his fellow graduate student George Uhlenbeck he postulated that in addition to mass and charge the electron possessed a further intrinsic property, internal angular mo- mentum, that is, spin. This inspiration furnished the missing link that explained the existence of multiple spectroscopic lines in atomic spectra, resulting in the final triumph of the then struggling birth of quantum mechanics. In 1927 he and Uhlenbeck together moved to the United States where they continued their physics careers until death. In a rough way Goudsmit’s career can be divided into several separate parts: first in Holland, strictly as a theorist, where he achieved very early success, and then at the University of Michigan, where he worked in the thriving field of preci- sion spectroscopy, concerning himself with the influence of nuclear magnetism on atomic spectra. In 1944 he became the scientific leader of the Alsos Mission, whose aim was to determine the progress Germans had made in the development of nuclear weapons during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Title: the Distribution of an Illustrated Timeline Wall Chart and Teacher's Guide of 20Fh Century Physics
    REPORT NSF GRANT #PHY-98143318 Title: The Distribution of an Illustrated Timeline Wall Chart and Teacher’s Guide of 20fhCentury Physics DOE Patent Clearance Granted December 26,2000 Principal Investigator, Brian Schwartz, The American Physical Society 1 Physics Ellipse College Park, MD 20740 301-209-3223 [email protected] BACKGROUND The American Physi a1 Society s part of its centennial celebration in March of 1999 decided to develop a timeline wall chart on the history of 20thcentury physics. This resulted in eleven consecutive posters, which when mounted side by side, create a %foot mural. The timeline exhibits and describes the millstones of physics in images and words. The timeline functions as a chronology, a work of art, a permanent open textbook, and a gigantic photo album covering a hundred years in the life of the community of physicists and the existence of the American Physical Society . Each of the eleven posters begins with a brief essay that places a major scientific achievement of the decade in its historical context. Large portraits of the essays’ subjects include youthful photographs of Marie Curie, Albert Einstein, and Richard Feynman among others, to help put a face on science. Below the essays, a total of over 130 individual discoveries and inventions, explained in dated text boxes with accompanying images, form the backbone of the timeline. For ease of comprehension, this wealth of material is organized into five color- coded story lines the stretch horizontally across the hundred years of the 20th century. The five story lines are: Cosmic Scale, relate the story of astrophysics and cosmology; Human Scale, refers to the physics of the more familiar distances from the global to the microscopic; Atomic Scale, focuses on the submicroscopic This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolfgang Pauli Niels Bohr Paul Dirac Max Planck Richard Feynman
    Wolfgang Pauli Niels Bohr Paul Dirac Max Planck Richard Feynman Louis de Broglie Norman Ramsey Willis Lamb Otto Stern Werner Heisenberg Walther Gerlach Ernest Rutherford Satyendranath Bose Max Born Erwin Schrödinger Eugene Wigner Arnold Sommerfeld Julian Schwinger David Bohm Enrico Fermi Albert Einstein Where discovery meets practice Center for Integrated Quantum Science and Technology IQ ST in Baden-Württemberg . Introduction “But I do not wish to be forced into abandoning strict These two quotes by Albert Einstein not only express his well­ more securely, develop new types of computer or construct highly causality without having defended it quite differently known aversion to quantum theory, they also come from two quite accurate measuring equipment. than I have so far. The idea that an electron exposed to a different periods of his life. The first is from a letter dated 19 April Thus quantum theory extends beyond the field of physics into other 1924 to Max Born regarding the latter’s statistical interpretation of areas, e.g. mathematics, engineering, chemistry, and even biology. beam freely chooses the moment and direction in which quantum mechanics. The second is from Einstein’s last lecture as Let us look at a few examples which illustrate this. The field of crypt­ it wants to move is unbearable to me. If that is the case, part of a series of classes by the American physicist John Archibald ography uses number theory, which constitutes a subdiscipline of then I would rather be a cobbler or a casino employee Wheeler in 1954 at Princeton. pure mathematics. Producing a quantum computer with new types than a physicist.” The realization that, in the quantum world, objects only exist when of gates on the basis of the superposition principle from quantum they are measured – and this is what is behind the moon/mouse mechanics requires the involvement of engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • Proton Tomography Through Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering
    Proton Tomography Through Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering Xiangdong Ji1, 2, ∗ 1Maryland Center for Fundamental Physics, Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA 2INPAC, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, P. R. China (Dated: November 7, 2018) Abstract In this prize talk, I recall some of the history surrounding the discovery of deeply virtual Compton scattering, and explain why it is an exciting experimental tool to obtain novel tomographic pictures of the nucleons at Jefferson Lab 12 GeV facility and the planned Electron-Ion Collider in the United States. arXiv:1605.01114v1 [hep-ph] 3 May 2016 ∗The 2016 Feshbach prize in theoretical nuclear physics talk given at APS April Meeting, Salt Lake City, Session U3: DNP Awards Session, Monday, April 18, 2016. The write-up is slightly expanded in details from the original talk. 1 It is certainly a great honor to have received the 2016 Herman Feshbach Prize in theoreti- cal nuclear physics by the American Physical Society (APS). I sincerely thank my colleagues in the Division of Nuclear Physics (DNP) to recognize the importance of some of the theoret- ical works I have done in the past, particularly their relevance to the experimental programs around the world. I. HERMAN FESHBACH AND ME Since this prize is in honor and memory of a great nuclear theorist, Herman Feshbach, it is fitting for me to start my talk by recalling some of my personal interactions with Herman. I first heard Feshbach back in 1982 when I was a freshman graduate student at Peking University before I knew anything about nuclear physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Turning Point in the Development of Quantum Mechanics and the Early Years of the Mossbauer Effect*
    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory FERMILAB-Conf-76/87-THY October 1976 A TURNING POINT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF QUANTUM MECHANICS AND THE EARLY YEARS OF THE MOSSBAUER EFFECT* Harry J. Lipkin' Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60^39 Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory"; Batavia, Illinois 60S10 It is interesting to hear about the exciting early days recalled by Professors Wigner and Wick. I learned quantum theory at a later period, which might be called a turning point in its development, when the general attitude toward quantum mechanics and the study of physics was very different from what it is today. As an undergraduate student in electrical engineering in 19^0 in the United States I found a certain disagreement between the faculty and the students about the "relevance'- of the curriculum. Students thought a k-year course in electrical engineering should include more electronics than a one-semester 3-hour course. But the establishment emphasized the study of power machinery and power transmission because 95'/° of their graduates would eventually get jobs in power. Electronics, they said, was fun for students who were radio hams but useless on the job market. Students at that time did not have today's attitudes and did not stage massive demonstrations and protests against the curriculum. Instead a few of us who wished to learn more interesting things satisfied all the requirements of the engineering school and spent as much extra time as possible listening to fascinating courses in the physics building. There we had the opportunity to listen to two recently-arrived Europeans, Bruno Rossi and Hans Bethe.
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein and the Early Theory of Superconductivity, 1919–1922
    Einstein and the Early Theory of Superconductivity, 1919–1922 Tilman Sauer Einstein Papers Project California Institute of Technology 20-7 Pasadena, CA 91125, USA [email protected] Abstract Einstein’s early thoughts about superconductivity are discussed as a case study of how theoretical physics reacts to experimental find- ings that are incompatible with established theoretical notions. One such notion that is discussed is the model of electric conductivity implied by Drude’s electron theory of metals, and the derivation of the Wiedemann-Franz law within this framework. After summarizing the experimental knowledge on superconductivity around 1920, the topic is then discussed both on a phenomenological level in terms of implications of Maxwell’s equations for the case of infinite conduc- tivity, and on a microscopic level in terms of suggested models for superconductive charge transport. Analyzing Einstein’s manuscripts and correspondence as well as his own 1922 paper on the subject, it is shown that Einstein had a sustained interest in superconductivity and was well informed about the phenomenon. It is argued that his appointment as special professor in Leiden in 1920 was motivated to a considerable extent by his perception as a leading theoretician of quantum theory and condensed matter physics and the hope that he would contribute to the theoretical direction of the experiments done at Kamerlingh Onnes’ cryogenic laboratory. Einstein tried to live up to these expectations by proposing at least three experiments on the arXiv:physics/0612159v1 [physics.hist-ph] 15 Dec 2006 phenomenon, one of which was carried out twice in Leiden. Com- pared to other theoretical proposals at the time, the prominent role of quantum concepts was characteristic of Einstein’s understanding of the phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • De Nobelprijzen Komen Eraan!
    De Nobelprijzen komen eraan! De Nobelprijzen komen eraan! In de loop van volgende week worden de Nobelprijswinnaars van dit jaar aangekondigd. Daarna weten we wie in december deze felbegeerde prijzen in ontvangst mogen gaan nemen. De Nobelprijzen zijn wellicht de meest prestigieuze en bekende academische onderscheidingen ter wereld, maar waarom eigenlijk? Hoe zijn de prijzen ontstaan, en wie was hun grondlegger, Alfred Nobel? Afbeelding 1. Alfred Nobel.Alfred Nobel (1833-1896) was de grondlegger van de Nobelprijzen. Volgende week is de jaarlijkse aankondiging van de prijswinnaard. Alfred Nobel Alfred Nobel was een belangrijke negentiende-eeuwse Zweedse scheikundige en uitvinder. Hij werd geboren in Stockholm in 1833 in een gezin met acht kinderen. Zijn vader, Immanuel Nobel, was een werktuigkundige en uitvinder die succesvol was met het maken van wapens en stoommotoren. Immanuel wou dat zijn zonen zijn bedrijf zouden overnemen en stuurde Alfred daarom op een twee jaar durende reis naar onder andere Duitsland, Frankrijk en de Verenigde Staten, om te leren over chemische werktuigbouwkunde. In Parijs ontmoette bron: https://www.quantumuniverse.nl/de-nobelprijzen-komen-eraan Pagina 1 van 5 De Nobelprijzen komen eraan! Alfred de Italiaanse scheikundige Ascanio Sobrero, die drie jaar eerder het explosief nitroglycerine had ontdekt. Nitroglycerine had een veel grotere explosieve kracht dan het buskruit, maar was ook veel gevaarlijker om te gebruiken omdat het instabiel is. Alfred raakte geinteresseerd in nitroglycerine en hoe het gebruikt kon worden voor commerciele doeleinden, en ging daarom werken aan de stabiliteit en veiligheid van de stof. Een makkelijk project was dit niet, en meerdere malen ging het flink mis.
    [Show full text]
  • Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratory and Lorentz Institute
    europhysicsnews 2015 • Volume 46 • number 2 Europhysics news is the magazine of the European physics community. It is owned by the European Physical Society and produced in cooperation with EDP Sciences. The staff of EDP Sciences are involved in the production of the magazine and are not responsible for editorial content. Most contributors to Europhysics news are volunteers and their work is greatly appreciated EPS HISTORIC SITES by the Editor and the Editorial Advisory Board. Europhysics news is also available online at: www.europhysicsnews.org General instructions to authors can be found at: www.eps.org/?page=publications Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratory Editor: Victor R. Velasco (SP) Email: [email protected] and Lorentz Institute Science Editor: Jo Hermans (NL) Email: [email protected] Leiden, The Netherlands Executive Editor: David Lee Email: [email protected] Graphic designer: Xavier de Araujo ‘The coldest place on earth’ Email: [email protected] Director of Publication: Jean-Marc Quilbé Editorial Advisory Board: Gonçalo Figueira (PT), Guillaume Fiquet (FR), On 9 February 2015, the site of the former Physics Zsolt Fülöp (Hu), Adelbert Goede (NL), Agnès Henri (FR), Martin Huber (CH), Robert Klanner (DE), Laboratory of Leiden University was officially Peter Liljeroth (FI), Stephen Price (UK), recognised as one of the ‘EPS Historic Sites’ Laurence Ramos (FR), Chris Rossel (CH), Claude Sébenne (FR), Marc Türler (CH) of the European Physical Society. On that day © European Physical Society and EDP Sciences EPS president-elect Christophe Rossel unveiled EPS Secretariat the commemorative plaque near the present-day Address: EPS • 6 rue des Frères Lumière 68200 Mulhouse • France entrance to the complex (since 2004 the location Tel: +33 389 32 94 40 • fax: +33 389 32 94 49 of Leiden University’s Law Faculty).
    [Show full text]
  • John Von Neumann's “Impossibility Proof” in a Historical Perspective’, Physis 32 (1995), Pp
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by SAS-SPACE Published: Louis Caruana, ‘John von Neumann's “Impossibility Proof” in a Historical Perspective’, Physis 32 (1995), pp. 109-124. JOHN VON NEUMANN'S ‘IMPOSSIBILITY PROOF’ IN A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ABSTRACT John von Neumann's proof that quantum mechanics is logically incompatible with hidden varibales has been the object of extensive study both by physicists and by historians. The latter have concentrated mainly on the way the proof was interpreted, accepted and rejected between 1932, when it was published, and 1966, when J.S. Bell published the first explicit identification of the mistake it involved. What is proposed in this paper is an investigation into the origins of the proof rather than the aftermath. In the first section, a brief overview of the his personal life and his proof is given to set the scene. There follows a discussion on the merits of using here the historical method employed elsewhere by Andrew Warwick. It will be argued that a study of the origins of von Neumann's proof shows how there is an interaction between the following factors: the broad issues within a specific culture, the learning process of the theoretical physicist concerned, and the conceptual techniques available. In our case, the ‘conceptual technology’ employed by von Neumann is identified as the method of axiomatisation. 1. INTRODUCTION A full biography of John von Neumann is not yet available. Moreover, it seems that there is a lack of extended historical work on the origin of his contributions to quantum mechanics.
    [Show full text]
  • Ginling College, the University of Michigan and the Barbour Scholarship
    Ginling College, the University of Michigan and the Barbour Scholarship Rosalinda Xiong United World College of Southeast Asia Singapore, 528704 Abstract Ginling College (“Ginling”) was the first institution of higher learning in China to grant bachelor’s degrees to women. Located in Nanking (now Nanjing) and founded in 1915 by western missionaries, Ginling had already graduated nearly 1,000 women when it merged with the University of Nanking in 1951 to become National Ginling University. The University of Michigan (“Michigan”) has had a long history of exchange with Ginling. During Ginling’s first 36 years of operation, Michigan graduates and faculty taught Chinese women at Ginling, and Ginlingers furthered their studies at Michigan through the Barbour Scholarship. This paper highlights the connection between Ginling and Michigan by profiling some of the significant people and events that shaped this unique relationship. It begins by introducing six Michigan graduates and faculty who taught at Ginling. Next we look at the 21 Ginlingers who studied at Michigan through the Barbour Scholarship (including 8 Barbour Scholars from Ginling who were awarded doctorate degrees), and their status after returning to China. Finally, we consider the lives of prominent Chinese women scholars from Ginling who changed China, such as Dr. Wu Yi-fang, a member of Ginling’s first graduating class and, later, its second president; and Miss Wu Ching-yi, who witnessed the brutality of the Rape of Nanking and later worked with Miss Minnie Vautrin to help refugees in Ginling Refugee Camp. Between 2015 and 2017, Ginling College celebrates the centennial anniversary of its founding; and the University of Michigan marks both its bicentennial and the hundredth anniversary of the Barbour Gift, the source of the Barbour Scholarship.
    [Show full text]