DOCSLIB.ORG

22-11 20-10-Se 22-11 20-10-Ne

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
22-11 20-10-Se 22-11 20-10-Ne SUNRIVER N L A T S U N G L U Y N N SUNRA IVER LPOST OFFICE L L I G LY L RI Z Z E D F R C O E IL A N X H T W R E L R D D R N R E G V N RE A A E L T E H T L R ALL E B V N K E LOO IL N E P L IS L D A N T V G E C E N I T L L N B E L A M L N O L A N N C N I B L E G T L A S N A E C N E E BA L L E CK A N M A WO T I D T D ODS N O P O T S P O O A W LN W E Y 153 E R R D L O RANI WAY D IL W M C R ER IG P H WOODLAND P IR T PE C SOUTH CENTURY DR 01 P LN 06 O L L 05 IN I T 04 M 03 W THREE RIVERS 02 AY R 01 06 N 05 E T E L P C ELEMENTARY F L AIRW CENTRAL 03 AY E P G A LN A G ST T E SCHOOL 04 A N LN I MEADOW P S LARK A P E R I K D BOAT LAUNCH E V LN LN N N R A E O L E L E N IV E TERPRIS N N E R N I L O F D P O G R R C ES R T R N D E LN TRAPPER PARKLAND I IV R R LN LN D P PIO R S G NEE IN R LN S N N PR E O S T E P U I S E S H L N R C N D E E R S N E ND PINE B D E L L FI C H L D E T U BOUGH R PA N S L D G PE TE R ABIN LN LN C R INA LN COO R E P SPRING RIVER RD R A R H D P IV O E R R LO Y S CK U E M O M L BOAT LAUNCH R P D IT G AZUSA RD G D N O N I O R IN R A R L R D C Y P B A S R D E N 97 E IN A ¡¢ W R P IV T D D A S Y R E O N N L U L BAKERSFIELD RD L L I E TT LE N RI O VE T P R S D O RD W IVER R O G R L PRIN O S COVINA RD L R G E V I R T 20-10-NW E C 154 L 12 T DOWNEY RD T 07 I R R L 20-O 11-NW 08 A HISTORICAL C V K E 09 20-10-NE N CEMETERY C I 10 0 R 0 11 6 0 ELSINORE RD 07 GU 08 2 12 AD 2 A 09 4 LU WA PE 10 D Y R 0 S 4 D F FONTANA RD R S R D F R D R O L E R R A T D I D E R P T E E D O S M GLENDALE RD S S N O E I P G I L L P N A L I E BOAT LAUNCH R R E T C E S C P S D G N E S L E N A A I O R T N R T E C P HERMOSA RD R C D S S D L A N P 3 C U M S A C INDIO RD E RAILMERE O T CI N R A C R D ANNS BUTTE JAC INTO RD S R E V P I O R O L N S I S L KINGSBURG G W RD N U G S T L S E SS WA IR U Y S F G S LA G E T R C LAGUNA RD FI R MERE CIR D IL A TR R D TW F A I R R N L I S VE L MERCED RD N RS D 0 E C R 0 R T R T P E D 6 - S D T O K 0 R 2 O C RAIL DR D 2 D E 4 M L 155 U D E 4 R R A R G 2 E K D R D N D E C AC Y K 2 R CE C T H E NORWALK RD R SS C 0 O E E S E E U F R L R D M I D F E T GATES O E F K EGRET D L C R U C B B 13 A A L 18 S OXNARD RD M B 17 ER R G MERGANSER DR D AN 16 S CUR Y E LEW DR PASADE R R 15 NA RD C U T 14 T 18 N 13 17 E QUARTZ HILL RD C 16 SATT E H R GULL DR T 15 L U E D E R IS O D L A W S N K D R A L R ROSEMEAD W O Y R A D O E P H P R AUKLET DR W I A H A P L Y S D D O R N R S S A A E N S M F O I D D SACRA N MENTO W R SA R C RAMENTO RD M K C I E RD G E L D K H Y T P S Y I R W O S R A A R N U R Y O A K D 4 S D W O S D H C N H E U G D E D O L T R U D N R S R E G I F T TORRANC GREBE RD EV S E RD O ND A A 9 A K V 7 N G 24 O V H D C N W R A T H I A S O D C O L M N CA D NVASBACK DR S R C B E G A R R A B L N R P E E U DR KILLDEER DR BLU L E G HER S 0 ON N A 2 D O E 2 D R 4 E W KINGFISHER DR E SC U D H G U L R T O E B S S R O F IV S TRADER LN KODIAK LN E E R R WINCHESTER DR D BRANT DR R R D 0 D D 0 T K R 5 E C E C IF - G K 0 C N U K A H 2 U HAS V 2 D D BEAR PAW LN LOG CABIN LN 4 A D S O D HARLEQUIN DR D O O R SHARP DR W O 156 S L W F P D SITKUM BUTTE MOCKINGBIRD LN P R R D K A R C H GOLDEN EYE DR O U Y S SP DER R D RINGER DR E EY DIPPER LN F C R T K S P C S A R L 24 O W B TRUMPETER LN 19 D O DR 20 4 OD DUC K SCAUP DR 2 21 2 Y GOLD CREST LN 0 A PITCH CT 22 W - 23 4 LOST R R IDER L S 1 24 D S P 19 E LOOP 0 20 R E V E I C 21 R N R R A P O 22 D X U E C T Y S PON C E O AV O E V T I B U LA PINE RFPD OLD WOOD RD S WIDG T EON DR H C R STATION #102 C O A S D U I Y R L E T A W E D S L P S R O G N E Y E D E X A P R L A GADWALL D E R P T N D E I M N E L T L T R E D A U I US I U O L C S R H N L 0 E T A THOUSAND TRAILS B A A W E A G P 3 G T O N S 2 T C W R F S GR 4 N O IMM RD STAG L E STOP DR A E M I D S KER O PI - H R PI NTAIL DR G R N C D I S B W IG A F U Y T R O A A I N V N W E E U S A W R L G R D O ON MASTE R B F E R U GUELFI RD THOLSTRUP DR BIG RIVER DR SOUTH CENTURY DR D BR A R E NZ N S D R ONA A B D E R V E CEDAR CT E Y S 8 R A D W BOAT LAUNCH SUN Y ST R D U R T E CAMP A N Y L E H A T C C C S I H W R GROUND I T U R C SO D 157 A H EID J E HEMLOCK CT I C A T T M S I E E M W O A H Y D HEIERMAN D R 20-10-SW R R E T S 25 O MEADO 30 F W WAY 29 D C AS R 28 R PE D R 20-11-SW D N R R O R 20-10-SE T E 27 D I V G 25 S R N G I BI S 30 DA T 29 O RIN L N N 26 R 28 U G N H 27 L N F E O H R E S T R R D L E N V E I R K A S R E D T U ASP N E N T H L P C F C T L S S T G R E E A V D 0 BATES BUTTE 50 D Z EL 20 V 4 42 2 RD 3 FS 0 11 10 NTURY DR SOUTH CE GRAY WOLF LN LIVELY LN BATES ST T R S D N LODGEPOLE LN E O CHAPMAN LN T S R T 158 N D U N U L B N S Y M H A Y R W N A O Road Index E R O C E W L I E L L C O H A I T R V E G C C G O N 12 I B S LA PINE DR, 2210NE N C P R S F O I ID ROAD NAME, T-R-1/4 D K LACAR LN, 2210NW I R G S C P H R A E R J D D LADY BUG LN, 2110NE RY H CT D U D T A R N D R # E N T N C E A R LAGUNA RD, 2010NE H L L T C E V U RE O I T N S H N 1ST ST, 2210NE R B O LAKE LN, 2110SW E E E T L R A T G L F 2ND ST, 2110NW, 2210NE P N Y V R O I LANDERS CT, 2210NE A E T I A N F S R M R N A T U L M 3RD ST, 2110NW, 2210NE D D H L E E LA PINE STATE RECREATION RD, 2110NE, 2111NW N AR R 36 D R W L 32 D LAZY RIVER DR 4TH ST, 2110NW, 2210NE 31 T R R O LASSO LN, 2210NE S D O S E FALL RIVER D P R R 5TH ST, 2110NE, 2210NE 33 LAUREL RD, 2210NW O A U FISH HATCHERY F CE CT V 6TH ST, 2110NE, 2210NE,2210NW 34 E LAVA DR, 2110NE, 2110NW J 35 I LL P 7TH ST, 2110NE R E 36 I LAZY RIVER DR, 2010SE, 2011SW E Y A CT P N Y W 31 E L IE V T V 32 I L O N T 8TH ST, 2110NE L O O N N LECHNER LN, 2210NW L A D R O PINE N L 33 W AS E E R L 34 L P P LEONA LN, 2110SE, 2110SW E L R L K R A I C V T F F A LESLIE DR, 2210NW E S R T D R R R N E A N A D I T LIBERTY RD, 2210NW L V 9 I U M O O C 72 R P A ABBOT CIR NO.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Section 2.5 Water Resources
    Exhibit B Section 2.5 Water Resources … Riparian Areas Riparian areas are areas adjacent to rivers, streams, lakes or ponds where there is vegetation that requires free or unbound water or conditions that are more moist than normal. Riparian areas form an interconnected system within a watershed. At the water's edge they define the transition zone between aquatic and terrestrial systems. Riparian areas often contain a diversity of vegetation not found in upland areas. Riparian areas are limited in Deschutes County and are important habitats for both fish and wildlife. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan, adopted in 1979 and revised, mapped riparian areas along the following rivers and streams. Table 2.5.5 - Riparian Acreage in Deschutes County Streams Riparian Acres Deschutes River 1,440 Little Deschutes River 2,920 Paulina Creek 846 Indian Ford Creek 573 Tumalo Creek 50 Whychus Creek 47 Fall River 43 Crooked River 38 TOTAL 5,966 Source: Deschutes County/City of Bend River Study 1986 Significant riparian habitat is located in one or more of the following three areas: . The area within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of an inventoried river or stream. The 100 foot wide area may contain both riparian vegetation and upland vegetation. Wetlands and flood plain are also frequently within 100 feet of a stream or river. In some cases the riparian vegetation may extend beyond 100 feet from the ordinary high water mark if it is a designated wetland or flood plain. The area adjacent to an inventoried river or stream and located within a flood plain mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and zoned Flood Plain Combining by the County.
    [Show full text]
  • RECONNAISSANCE INVESTIGATION of SEDIMENT DISTRIBUTION, EROSION, and TRANSPORT in the UPPER DESCHUTES RIVER, DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, NOVEMBER 1986 by Kenneth A
    RECONNAISSANCE INVESTIGATION OF SEDIMENT DISTRIBUTION, EROSION, AND TRANSPORT IN THE UPPER DESCHUTES RIVER, DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, NOVEMBER 1986 By Kenneth A. Cameron and Jon J. Major U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 87-4114 Prepared in cooperation with the U. S. FOREST SERVICE Vancouver, Washington 1987 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey U. S. Geological Survey 5400 MacArthur Boulevard Books and Open-file Reports Vancouver, Washington 98661 Federal Center, Building 810 Box 25425 Denver, Colorado 80225 11 CONTENTS Page Abstract ---------------------------------------------------------- 1 Introduction ------------------------------------------------------ 2 Statement of problem ----------------------------------------- 2 Purpose and scope -------------------------------------------- 3 Method of investigation -------------------------------------- 3 General stratigraphy ---------------------------------------------- 6 River history ----------------------------------------------------- 7 Granulometric data ------------------------------------------------ 9 Erosion ----------------------------------------------------------- 13 Dendrochronologic determination of bank-erosion rates -------- 13 Riparian area ------------------------------------------------ 14 Channel area ------------------------------------------------- 14 Bedload transport
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Deschutes River Fish Managementplan
    Upper Deschutes River Fish ManagementPlan Draft May22, 1996 Oregon Department of Fish and Wtldlife Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife Page 1 of 431 Upper Deschutes River Basin Fish Management Plan 1996 COMPLETED DISTRICT DRAFT 04/11/96 6:12:58 PM DESCHUTES RIVER from Wickiup Dam to Bend (North Canal Dam) including the tributaries Fall River and Spring River Overview This portion of the basin plan includes the Deschutes River from Wickiup Dam (RM 227) downstream to Bend (North Canal Dam, RM 164.8), Fall River, and Spring River. The Little Deschutes River, a major tributary which enters at RM 193, is not included because of its' length and connection with other waters in the basin. The Little Deschutes River will be presented in a separate section of the basin plan. In the Habitat and Fish Management sections of the following discussion, the Deschutes River will be divided into two sections; Wickiup Dam to Benham Falls (RM 181), and Benham Falls to Bend (North Canal Dam). The reason for this is based on stream morphology and changes in fish populations. Benham Falls is a high gradient natural cascade which separates the Deschutes River into two logical sections with low gradient above the falls and high gradient below. Similarly, fish population composition changes at Benham Falls with brown trout dominant above and rainbow trout dominant below. The remaining sections; location and ownership, fish stocking history, angling regulations, management issues, summary of alternatives and alternatives will be presented as (1) Deschutes River, and (2) Tributaries. In 1987, the Oregon legislature designated the section of Deschutes River from Wickiup Dam to General Patch Bridge, and from Harper Bridge to the north boundary of the Deschutes National Forest as a State Scenic Waterway.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Management
    Chapter 2 Chapter 2 Resource Management Section 2.1 Introduction Background Resource lands are essentially available assets. In 1973 Oregon passed legislation with the intent of providing statewide protection to many of Oregon’s land use resources. At that time, farming and wood products were the primary economic drivers for the State, so farm and forest lands were specifically noted for protection and are often referred to as resource lands. Other resources were also identified. The structure for protecting Oregon’s lands is provided by five of the 19 Statewide Planning Goals and the associated Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) and Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR). This chapter includes resources protected through the Statewide Goals. Farm lands are protected by Statewide Goal 3, Agricultural Lands, ORS 215 and OAR 660-033. Goal 3 requires all counties to inventory and protect farm lands. The ORSs and OARs further define which land should be designated farm land and what uses are permissible. The State regulations for managing farm lands are comprehensive and complex. Forest lands are protected by Statewide Goal 4, Forest Lands, various sections of ORS and OAR 660-006. The Goal again requires all counties to inventory forest lands and adopt policies that will conserve forest lands for forest uses. Statewide Goal 5, Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas and Open Spaces, establishes a process for inventorying and evaluating more than a dozen natural and cultural resources. The process is defined in OAR 660-016 and OAR 660-023. If a resource is found to be significant, local government can protect it, allow uses that conflict with it, or find a balance.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Two Post-Mazama Prehistoric Flaked Stone Scatters in the Upper Deschutes River Basin of Central Oregon
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Janine Ruth McFarland for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies in the co-departments of Anthropology, History, and Geography presented on February 1, 1989. Title: An Analysis of Two Post-Mazama Flaked Stone Scatters in the Upper Deschutes River Basin of Central Oregon Abstract approved: Richard E. Ross During the summer of 1986, an archaeological testing projectwas completed at seven prehistoric campsites primarily located in the upper Deschutes River Basin of central Oregon. Testing was focused on two low-density "lithic scatters", an archaelogical sitetype which is especially abundant in this obsidian-rich region but which,to date, has not been extensively studied. Excavations indicated that the obsidian flake scatters post-date the 6800 B.F. eruption ofMount Mazama and represent the remains of huntingcamps focused along Fall River. The testing strategy employed providedan alternative approach to testing and evaluating the archaeological significanceof obsidian flake scatters located throughout the pumicezone of central Oregon. An Analysis of Two Post-Mazama Prehistoric Flaked Stone Scatters in the Upper Deschutes River Basin of Central Oregon by Janine Ruth McFarland A THESIS Submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies Completed February 1, 1989 Commencement June 1989 APPROVED Professor of Anthropology in charge of major A Associate Pitifessor of Astory in charge of co-field Professor of Geography in charge of co-field A Chair of Depliment of Antl.ropoOy Dean ul urduu acnooi kj Cr Date Thesis is Presented: February 1, 1989 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First of all, I'd like to express a heartfelt thank-you to Carl M.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Deschutes Subbasin Assessment August 2003
    Upper Deschutes Subbasin Assessment August 2003 By Kolleen E. Yake EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Upper Deschutes Subbasin Assessment began work in 2002 as a project of the Upper Deschutes Watershed Council. From its inception, the assessment has been a cooperative venture with multiple partners, participants, and advisors. Funding for the project came from grants received from the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board and the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. In-kind donations of time, technical assistance, contract services, and equipment were generously contributed to the project by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Deschutes National Forest, the Deschutes Resources Conservancy, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Bureau of Land Management, OSU-Cascades, the Nature Conservancy, the Oregon Water Resources Department, Deschutes County Soil and Water Conservation District, and GeoSpatial Solutions among many others. The purpose of the Upper Deschutes Subbasin Assessment was to gather together existing data and information on all the historic and current conditions that play a role in impacting the watershed health of the subbasin. The details, recommendations, and data gaps discussed within the assessment will assist the Upper Deschutes Watershed Council and other natural resource managers in the area identify key restoration projects and opportunities to enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water quality in the subbasin. By combining all of the existing available information on watershed resources, the Upper Deschutes Watershed Council hopes to raise community awareness about the interconnections and impacts within the whole Upper Deschutes Subbasin system. The key findings and recommendations within the assessment identify and prioritize opportunities for voluntary actions that are directed toward improving fish and wildlife habitat and water quality.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Corridor Management and Interpretive Plan
    CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT AND INTERPRETIVE PLAN 2018 Acknowledgments Thank you to the Federal Highway Administration for funding this project through the National Scenic Byways Program. Thank you also to the America’s Byways Resource Center for their excellent training modules for Corridor Management Planning. Many thanks are also due to the Byway Community Group and to all of the Byway partners and proponents representing community support for the Cascade Lakes National Scenic Byway. Funded in part by Federal Highway Administration Scenic Byway Partners Washanaksha Coalition Warm Springs, Oregon BEND2030 vision builds Crook County Cultural Coalition www.sunriverchamber.com CONTENTS Chapter I: Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................5 Statement of Significance ..........................................................................................................................................5 Vision .....................................................................................................................................................................................5 Description ........................................................................................................................................................................6 Byway History ..................................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Deschutes River Fisheries Monitoring Report
    Oregon Department and Fish and Wildlife Fisheries Monitoring Report 2015 Deschutes River Fisheries Monitoring Report: Assessing Redband Trout status in the middle and upper Deschutes River basin using young- of-the-year occupancy surveys in lateral habitats Steven J. Starcevich and Beth Bailey Native Fish Investigations Program Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife June 2017 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 2 Acknowledgements Special thanks to the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB, Grant #214-4014-10821), ODFW/Central Oregon Irrigation District Deschutes Mitigation and Enhancement Program, Upper Deschutes Watershed Council (UDWC), and ODFW Restoration & Enhancement Board for providing project funding and support. Thanks to Nancy Doran, Emma Garner, Leah Hough and Andy Johnsen (ODFW Deschutes Watershed District) for field data collection; and Lauren Mork (UDWC), Mike Meeuwig (ODFW-NFIP), and Ken Fetcho (OWEB) for a review of a draft report. Assessing trout status in the middle and upper Deschutes River 3 Abstract The Deschutes River, from Big Falls upstream to Wickiup Dam, has experienced dramatic alterations to its flow regime, habitat quality and connectivity, ecological processes, and fish community, including a perceived decline in the distribution and abundance of Redband Trout. Concern for the status of this species in this river and some of its tributaries led to a research effort to gain a better understanding of the distribution and abundance of Redband Trout and other salmonids and test the feasibility and effectiveness
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Deschutes River Redband Trout Population Genetics
    North American Journal of Fisheries Management © 2019 American Fisheries Society ISSN: 0275-5947 print / 1548-8675 online DOI: 10.1002/nafm.10288 ARTICLE Describing Fine‐Scale Patterns of Genetic Structure and Introgression of Redband Trout in a Complex River System Justin H. Bohling* U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Abernathy Fish Technology Center, 1440 Abernathy Creek Road, Longview, Washington 98632, USA Steven J. Starcevich Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Native Fish Investigations Program, 28655 Highway 34, Corvallis, Oregon 97333, USA Jennifer Von Bargen U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Abernathy Fish Technology Center, 1440 Abernathy Creek Road, Longview, Washington 98632, USA Elizabeth J. Bailey Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Native Fish Investigations Program, 28655 Highway 34, Corvallis, Oregon 97333, USA Abstract The conservation status of Redband Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri has been an increasing concern of fish managers. Effective fish management first requires an understanding of the spatial distribution of distinct popula- tions and the processes influencing gene flow. We performed a genetic analysis of Redband Trout from the Deschutes River basin in central Oregon to discern population genetic structure and the genetic impacts of an extensive hatchery stocking program and several potential barriers to dispersal. Conducting surveys in lateral habi- tats, we sampled over 1,400 young‐of‐the‐year Redband Trout and genotyped them at a panel of 269 SNPs using genotyping‐in‐thousands by sequencing. We found that within this section of the Deschutes River basin there were multiple distinct genetic groups of Redband Trout, with an irrigation diversion dam and only one of eight waterfalls in the study area acting as complete barriers to gene flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Deschutes River and Tumalo Creek 2005-2008 (Bend, Oregon)
    Upper Deschutes Watershed Council Technical Report City of Bend Ambient Water Quality Monitoring: Deschutes River and Tumalo Creek 2005‐2008 (Bend, Oregon) Prepared for: City of Bend Public Works Department 575 NE 15th Street Bend, OR 97701 Prepared by: Lesley Jones and Ryan Houston Upper Deschutes Watershed Council PO Box 1812 Bend, OR 97709 June 30, 2010 Acknowledgements There are numerous individuals and organizations that have helped support the water quality monitoring that is part of this report. The City of Bend staff, including the team at Public Works, the Laboratory and Water Divisions, were instrumental in project planning, implementation, and final documentation. In particular, the following team members have dedicated a tremendous amount of time and energy to the monitoring work presented in this report: Steve Prazak, Jeff Buystedt, Drexell Barnes, Ollie Fick, Patrick Griffiths, Wendy Edde and Tom Hickmann. The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Laboratory and field crews contributed a great deal of guidance with methodologies and assistance in the development and adaptation of field protocols. In particular, the following contributors are appreciated: Steve Hanson, Greg Pettit, and Michael Tichenor. Bonnie Lamb, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Natural Resource Specialist Eastern Region and Joanne Richter of Richter Environmental Consulting, assisted with the early development of the monitoring program in the City of Bend. The UDWC Water Quality Monitoring Program relies on funding from the City of Bend,
    [Show full text]
  • Focal Fish Species Characterization APPENDIX I
    Focal Fish Species Focal Fish Species Characterization APPENDIX I This chapter describes the fish species selected to evaluate the health of the Deschutes Basin ecosystem and the effectiveness of management actions in the basin. These species were selected because they have special ecological, cultural or legal status. The chapter provides information on each focal species. In particular, it describes the status of each focal species population, as well as its historic and current distribution within the Deschutes Subbasin. It also discusses historic and current artificial production programs and harvest within the subbasin, and the relationship between artificial and naturally produced populations. Focal Species Selection The Deschutes River Basin supports more than thirty species of indigenous and introduced fish. Indigenous salmonids comprise six of the species and include Chinook salmon, summer steelhead, sockeye salmon, redband trout, bull trout and mountain whitefish. Five introduced salmonid species present in the subbasin include Coho salmon, brown trout, cutthroat trout, brook trout and lake trout. Five of the thirty fish species in the Deschutes River Basin have been chosen as aquatic focal species for this subbasin plan: Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), steelhead/redband trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus), sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) and Pacific Lamprey (Lampetra tridentata) (Table 1). The five species were selected by the Fish Technical Team, a group of fish and natural resource experts brought together to provide technical advice during the subbasin planning process. The team selected the focal species based on their significance and ability to characterize the health of the ecosystem and the effectiveness of management actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Author of 'East of Thecascads A
    / S OREGON STATE UN VERS TV LIBRARIES 3O 1111111111 liii 11111111111111 12 0143180988 VISITOR INFORMATION SERVICE Deschutes National Forest 1969 SI'RA!!l PC:: c:::c DI5RICT BO 243 ci 775g By Phil F. Brogan Author of 'East of theCascads A. 0. ThE V1O197Z LAND USE ieitnnv ills, Oregon. CE1VED EEC. Novenber 8, 1972. a& WL ADti. Forest Supervisor PRSC BUD. Ac. Deechutes ilational Forest CONTRA Bend, Oregon. BANGERS if Dear iii. Nichols ;- - L ire fnr voirletter of October 31. Thanksalso for the. loan of the Phil Brogan document, hisrirfled herewIth-.- The Brogan report is a welldocunented bit of history, we 1rvr9for easy reference and reflects sonerather extensiv 3O 1973 discrepancies, however, andDR research. I dofindafew ciinor oa will coa.ent on thei briefly. RcASSt. Pege 127. "First road toPaullna Lake by John Curl, l9l2 'Jrong. The first.road, or moreproperly a wagon track, to I Pn11niTa ws3utthere by Ralph Coiwell, arancher on Pauhina Prairie. Colweli built thedaat the Pauhina Lake outlet to store water for irrIgation.The road wasrusen out to facIlItate constructionof the dam. Te road and dai were both oresent onJuly 1, 1911, the day I first sawPaulina Lake. AA Page 130. Pine iountain Fire,1915. Irong. There iere some noteworthy fires on the Pine ijountainistrict in 1913 and while I was on detail to theSiuslaw, but none of special n in 1915. As I recall, there were sonebad fires on the Fort Rock district, under Bill EarrLan,in 1915. On one occasion I crossed over the districtboundary to give Billan assist. In 1918, a 1700 acre'ire scorched the south faceof Pine iountain.
    [Show full text]