DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2004 Vastned Industrial/Offices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2004 Vastned Industrial/Offices VastNed Offices / IndustrialAnnual VastNed/ N.V. Offices Report 2004 Annual Report 2004 VastNed Offices/Industrial Key figures Key figures property portfolio (in operation) 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ Netherlands Belgium France Total Results (x € 1 million) ____________________ ____________________ _______ _______ Gross rental income 94.0 108.2 117.8 111.3 83.6 Semi- Semi- Semi- Offices industrial Offices industrial industrial Direct investment result 40.8 48.6 52.6 52.2 48.2 _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ Indirect investment result (37.7) (31.5) (37.8) (8.2) 6.1 ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ Number of tenants 325 120 188 44 1 678 Investment result 3.1 17.1 14.8 44.0 54.3 Theoretical annual rental income (x € 1 million) 39.8 17.0 40.5 12.7 0.3 110.3 Market rent (x € 1 million) 38.2 16.1 36.7 11.5 0.3 102.8 Balance sheet (x € 1 million) Over/under-rent (in %) 104 106 110 111 127 107 Investments in property 1,165.6 1,262.6 1,323.1 1,271.3 1,131.7 Group equity 601.3 631.3 669.5 646.1 553.0 Average occupancy rate (in %) 86.0 84.0 79.4 93.0 100.0 84.2 Shareholders’ equity 466.4 509.0 540.6 570.4 547.1 Occupancy rate at year-end (in %) 87.7 74.8 79.8 93.5 100.0 83.5 Long-term liabilities 387.9 420.1 400.3 324.0 190.0 Rent-free periods / rent discounts (in %) 1.0 1.5 1.9 6.4 – 1.0 Composition property portfolio (in %) Number of properties 100 36 26 18 1 181 Netherlands 53 53 56 67 84 Investments (x € 1 million) 409.6 154.2 416.6 129.5 2.4 1,112.3 Belgium 47 45 42 31 13 Investments (as % of total) 37 14.0 37 12 < 1 100 France < 1 2 2 2 3 Ten largest properties (in %) 23 78 71 80 100 30 Average size of property (x € 1 million) 4.1 4.3 15.4 7.2 2.4 6.1 Offices 74 72 71 71 63 Logistics centres and industrial premises 26 28 29 29 36 Lettable floor space (in sqm) 307,412 300,640 286,320 254,509 11,753 1,160,634 Retail properties – – – – 1 Lettable floor space (as % of total) 26 26 25 22 1 100 Average number of ordinary shares in issue 19,143,124 18,742,694 18,274,314 17,824,369 17,143,413 Gross return (in %) 9.7 11.0 9.7 9.8 14.5 9.9 Number of ordinary shares in issue (at year-end) 19,273,904 18,894,020 18,437,541 17,948,295 17,611,959 Net return (in %) 7.6 9.3 9.3 9.7 12.5 8.6 Per share (x € 1) Average rent per sqm (x € 1) 1) 2) Shareholders’ equity per share at beginning of year Large cities 140 91 – – – 114 (including dividend) 26.94 29.32 31.78 31.06 32.25 Medium-sized cities 127 42 135 – – 93 Final dividend previous financial year (2.80) (3.10) (3.16) (1.65) (2.90) Small cities 106 59 147 51 – 86 Shareholders’ equity per share ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ at beginning of year (excluding dividend) 24.14 26.22 28.62 29.41 29.35 Regional spread (in %) Large cities 49 30 6 11 – 26 Direct investment result 2.13 2.59 2.88 2.93 2.82 Medium-sized cities 38 31 39 8 100 34 Indirect investment result (1.97) (1.68) (2.07) (0.46) 0.35 Small cities 13 39 55 81 – 40 Other movements (0.10) (0.19) (0.11) (0.10) (0.08) ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ Industry spread (in %) Investment result 0.06 0.72 0.70 2.37 3.09 Financial services 13 9 4 – – 8 Interim dividend – – – – (1.38) Business services 33 34 55 18 – 39 Shareholders’ equity per share at year-end ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ Technology, media, telecoms 12 12 17 – – 13 (including dividend) 24.20 26.94 29.32 31.78 31.06 Government 27 6 15 – – 16 Other 15 39 9 82 100 24 Share price (at year-end) 22.80 20.50 21.50 25.25 28.80 1) Parking spaces included in rent. Dividend in cash 2.13 2.80 3.10 3.16 3.03 2) Average is only calculated if the number of properties in the category is over 5. or in cash 1.88 2.25 2.30 2.20 1.83 and in shares charged to the share premium reserve 1) 2.86% 4.35% 3.85% 5.50% shareholders’ equity at beginning of year (excluding dividend) 8.8 10.7 10.8 10.7 10.3 Ratio group equity/ investments in property (in %) 51.6 50.0 50.6 50.8 48.9 Ratio long-term loan capital/ short-term loan capital (in %) 65/35 63/37 52/48 56/44 69/31 1) A percentage in shares yet to be determined charged to the share premium reserve. As from January 1, 2004 the costs of asset management are brought to the charge of the direct investment result. The comparative figures have been adjusted accordingly. Key figures Key figures property portfolio (in operation) 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ Netherlands Belgium France Total Results (x € 1 million) ____________________ ____________________ _______ _______ Gross rental income 94.0 108.2 117.8 111.3 83.6 Semi- Semi- Semi- Offices industrial Offices industrial industrial Direct investment result 40.8 48.6 52.6 52.2 48.2 _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ Indirect investment result (37.7) (31.5) (37.8) (8.2) 6.1 ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ Number of tenants 325 120 188 44 1 678 Investment result 3.1 17.1 14.8 44.0 54.3 Theoretical annual rental income (x € 1 million) 39.8 17.0 40.5 12.7 0.3 110.3 Market rent (x € 1 million) 38.2 16.1 36.7 11.5 0.3 102.8 Balance sheet (x € 1 million) Over/under-rent (in %) 104 106 110 111 127 107 Investments in property 1,165.6 1,262.6 1,323.1 1,271.3 1,131.7 Group equity 601.3 631.3 669.5 646.1 553.0 Average occupancy rate (in %) 86.0 84.0 79.4 93.0 100.0 84.2 Shareholders’ equity 466.4 509.0 540.6 570.4 547.1 Occupancy rate at year-end (in %) 87.7 74.8 79.8 93.5 100.0 83.5 Long-term liabilities 387.9 420.1 400.3 324.0 190.0 Rent-free periods / rent discounts (in %) 1.0 1.5 1.9 6.4 – 1.0 Composition property portfolio (in %) Number of properties 100 36 26 18 1 181 Netherlands 53 53 56 67 84 Investments (x € 1 million) 409.6 154.2 416.6 129.5 2.4 1,112.3 Belgium 47 45 42 31 13 Investments (as % of total) 37 14.0 37 12 < 1 100 France < 1 2 2 2 3 Ten largest properties (in %) 23 78 71 80 100 30 Average size of property (x € 1 million) 4.1 4.3 15.4 7.2 2.4 6.1 Offices 74 72 71 71 63 Logistics centres and industrial premises 26 28 29 29 36 Lettable floor space (in sqm) 307,412 300,640 286,320 254,509 11,753 1,160,634 Retail properties – – – – 1 Lettable floor space (as % of total) 26 26 25 22 1 100 Average number of ordinary shares in issue 19,143,124 18,742,694 18,274,314 17,824,369 17,143,413 Gross return (in %) 9.7 11.0 9.7 9.8 14.5 9.9 Number of ordinary shares in issue (at year-end) 19,273,904 18,894,020 18,437,541 17,948,295 17,611,959 Net return (in %) 7.6 9.3 9.3 9.7 12.5 8.6 Per share (x € 1) Average rent per sqm (x € 1) 1) 2) Shareholders’ equity per share at beginning of year Large cities 140 91 – – – 114 (including dividend) 26.94 29.32 31.78 31.06 32.25 Medium-sized cities 127 42 135 – – 93 Final dividend previous financial year (2.80) (3.10) (3.16) (1.65) (2.90) Small cities 106 59 147 51 – 86 Shareholders’ equity per share ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ at beginning of year (excluding dividend) 24.14 26.22 28.62 29.41 29.35 Regional spread (in %) Large cities 49 30 6 11 – 26 Direct investment result 2.13 2.59 2.88 2.93 2.82 Medium-sized cities 38 31 39 8 100 34 Indirect investment result (1.97) (1.68) (2.07) (0.46) 0.35 Small cities 13 39 55 81 – 40 Other movements (0.10) (0.19) (0.11) (0.10) (0.08) ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ Industry spread (in %) Investment result 0.06 0.72 0.70 2.37 3.09 Financial services 13 9 4 – – 8 Interim dividend – – – – (1.38) Business services 33 34 55 18 – 39 Shareholders’ equity per share at year-end ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ Technology, media, telecoms 12 12 17 – – 13 (including dividend) 24.20 26.94 29.32 31.78 31.06 Government 27 6 15 – – 16 Other 15 39 9 82 100 24 Share price (at year-end) 22.80 20.50 21.50 25.25 28.80 1) Parking spaces included in rent.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sec(2005)1764
    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 15.12.2005 SEC(2005) 1764 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Second annual report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of the AGIS programme YEAR 2004 EN EN COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER Second annual report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of the AGIS programme YEAR 2004 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 3 2. THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2004 BUDGET ................................................ 4 2.1. Projects......................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.1. Non Budgetary Indicators ............................................................................................ 5 2.1.2. Budgetary indicators.................................................................................................... 8 3. CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................................ 12 4. ANNEX I: LIST OF SELECTED PROJECTS IN 2004 ........................................... 14 EN 2 EN 1. INTRODUCTION From January 2003, the former five Programmes established under Title VI (Grotius Criminal, Oisin, Stop, Falcone and Hippokrates) were replaced and brought together into a single Programme - the AGIS Framework Programme. The AGIS Programme, a framework programme that aims to promote police and judicial co- operation in criminal matters,
    [Show full text]
  • The Educational System of the Netherlands
    The educational system of the Netherlands Ruud Luijkx and Manon de Heus1 1 Short historical overview The first act on compulsory education got implemented in 1900. This act made primary education of six grades compulsory to all children between 6 and 12 years of age. Repeatedly, there had been made adjustments to this act, but in 1969 it was completely replaced. According to the new act, all children aged 6 to 16 were obliged to fully attend daytime classes. In 1985, the lower limit was adjusted to the age of 5, and since then, full‐time edu‐ cation is compulsory for at least 12 complete school years. Students who have reached the age of 16 in the past school year are not obliged to attend education full‐time anymore. However, they are compelled to attend part‐time education (that is, at least 1 or 2 days a week) for at least another year. This is known as the act on partial compulsory education (partiële leerplichtwet). At the end of the school year in which the student turns 17, the student is not obliged to attend part‐ time‐education anymore (Eurydice, 2005a). Since the start of compulsory education in the Netherlands, the educational system has changed in many respects. However, there is one very important characteristic of the Dutch educational system that has stayed intact since the beginning of the 20th century. That is, since 1917, public and private education have been treated equally by law. This so‐called freedom of education (article 23 of the Dutch consti‐ tution) refers to the right of all Dutch citizens to found schools or follow education based on certain religious, ideological, or educational persuasions.
    [Show full text]
  • Gricard-Nihoul-Note Europeanelections.Indd
    EUROPEAN DEMOCRACY IN ACTION EUROPEAN ELECTIONS: FIVE REFLECTIONS FOR DISCUSSION GAËTANE RICARD-NIHOUL JULY 2009 GAËTANE RICARD-NIHOUL IS SECRETARY GENERAL OF NOTRE EUROPE. SHE HOLDS A DEGREE IN POLITICAL SCIENCE AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE AND AN MPHIL AND A DPHIL IN EUROPEAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY FROM OXFORD UNIVERSITY. HER RESEARCH FOCUSED ON POLICY FORMATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION, AND MORE PARTICULARLY ON EDUCATION POLICY. SHE IS THE AUTHOR OF SEVERAL STUDIES: « THE FRENCH ‘NO’ VOTE OF 29 MAY: UNDERSTANDING, ACTION » AND «THE REVISION OF THE EUROPEAN TREATIES: THE CONVENTIONMOMENT». EUROPEAN ELECTIONS: FIVE REFLECTIONS FOR DICUSSION - 1 1. Is abstention intractable? the progress made by this idea since 1998. But given the fall in turnout, we can only regret that once again the idea has not been put into practice. Average turnout across the EU for these elections of June 2009 was assessed at 43.2%. It was 45.5% in 2004 and 62% in 1979. The paradox Of course, the situation is not entirely gloomy. Participation increased in 8 of European elections persists: for 30 years participation has fallen with member states and remained stable in 7. But such increases or stability are each election, while in parallel the European Parliament’s competencies relative to 2004 figures which were somewhat low – or in certain cases very have grown significantly. The Parliament was already a major winner of the low. It is interesting to note the rising participation in two Scandinavian treaties of Maastricht, Nice and Amsterdam; if the Lisbon Treaty is ratified it countries where opinion has seemed increasingly favourable to European will become co-legislator, with the Council, in a large majority of the Union’s integration in recent years (59.52% against 47.89% in 2004 in Denmark; policy areas, and will have blocking power throughout the budget negotia- 43.8% against 37.85% in Sweden).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2004
    NETHERLANDS HELSINKI COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT 2004 This report was compiled by Carien Westerveld English Revision by Peter Morris Print: Krips Repro Meppel P.O. Box 93132 2509 AC The Hague The Netherlands Telephone: +31 (0)70 3926700 Fax: +31 (0)70 3926550 E-mail: [email protected] www.nhc.nl CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 5 1. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES .................................................... 7 1.1. Helsinki Committees.....................................................................7 1.2. The International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights ......................8 1.3. Objectives of the Netherlands Helsinki Committee ..............................9 2. ACTIVITIES.....................................................................................11 2.1. Research.................................................................................. 11 2.2. Monitoring............................................................................... 12 2.3. Publicity .................................................................................. 13 2.4. Lobbying ................................................................................. 14 2.5. Technical assistance ................................................................... 15 2.5.1. Strengthening the role and independence of the judiciary........... 16 - Strengthening the legal culture in Croatia: improvement of the relations between the judiciary and the media .................... 16 2.5.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Elevators and Escalators) (Notified Under Document Number C(2007) 512 Final) (Only the English Version Is Authentic)
    26.3.2008 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 75/19 Summary of Commission Decision of 21 February 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (Case COMP/E-1/38.823 — Elevators and Escalators) (notified under document number C(2007) 512 final) (Only the English version is authentic) (2008/C 75/10) I. SUMMARY OF THE INFRINGEMENTS Introduction 1. The decision was addressed to KONE Belgium SA, KONE GmbH, KONE Luxembourg SARL, KONE BV Liften en Roltrappen, KONE Corporation (hereinafter ‘KONE’), Mitsubishi Elevator Europe BV, NV OTIS SA, Otis GmbH & Co. OHG, General Technic-Otis SARL, General Technic SARL, Otis BV, Otis Elevator Company, United Technologies Corporation (hereinafter ‘Otis’), Schindler SA/NV, Schindler Deutschland Holding GmbH, Schindler SARL, Schindler Liften BV, Schindler Holding Ltd (hereinafter ‘Schindler’), ThyssenKrupp Liften Ascenseurs NV/SA, ThyssenKrupp Aufzüge GmbH, ThyssenKrupp Fahrtreppen GmbH, ThyssenKrupp Ascenseurs Luxembourg SARL, ThyssenKrupp Liften BV, ThyssenKrupp Elevator AG and ThyssenKrupp AG (hereinafter ‘ThyssenKrupp’). 2. The addressees participated in four separate but related single and continuous infringements of Article 81 of the Treaty in Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg and the Netherlands regarding elevators and escalators. Each of the four infringements covered the whole territory of one of these Member States. Procedure 3. The Commission initiated the investigation on its own initiative (‘ex-officio’) in early 2004 using informa- tion brought to its attention. Three rounds of inspections (Belgium, and Germany: January 2004; Belgium, Germany and Luxembourg: March 2004 and the Netherlands: April 2004) and a large number of leniency applications under the 2002 Leniency Notice confirmed that cartels were run in Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg and the Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2004 Contents
    annual report 2004 contents Bank Profile 1 Financial Highlights 2 Report of the Supervisory Board 3 Governing Bodies 5 Report of the Executive Board 6 Economic Environment In Turkey 8 Bank Operations 10 Wholesale Business 10 Retail Operations 11 Treasury Operations 15 Risk Management 16 Expectations 17 Board Staff and Personnel 18 Management and Staff 19 Financial Statement for the Year 2004 21 Consolidated balance sheet as of 31 December 2004 22 Consolidated profit and loss account for the financial year 2004 23 Consolidated cash flow statement for the financial year 2004 24 Notes to the consolidated balance sheet and profit and loss account 25 Financial Statement for the Year 2004 38 Company balance sheet as of 31 December 2004 38 Company profit and loss account for the financial year 2004 38 Notes to the company balance sheet and profit and loss account 39 Other Information 41 Auditor's Report 43 Directory 44 Dear reader, You may be surprised to see that we have chosen to illustrate our 2004 Annual Report with a number of children’s drawings, so here is a word of explanation. For the past seven years, DHB Bank has organized an annual drawing contest for children in the Netherlands. Each year, a theme is chosen, and the children compete in three age categories. The contest is enjoying an increasing popularity, and by now, more than thousand children participate in each edition. The contest, named "DeHa Cocuk", Turkish for whiz kid as well as a reference to our bank’s name, is traditionally organized in the run-up to April 23, the Turkish National Sovereignty and Children’s Day.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoonoses and Zoonotic Agents in Humans, Food, Animals and Feed in the Netherlands 2003-2006
    Zoonoses and Zoonotic Agents in Humans, Food, Animals and Feed in the Netherlands 2003-2006 Zoonoses and Zoonotic Agents in Humans, Food, Animals and Feed in the Netherlands 2003-2006 Editors: S. Valkenburgh, R. van Oosterom, O. Stenvers, M. Aalten, M. Braks, B. Schimmer, A. van de Giessen, W. van Pelt, M. Langelaar Centrum Infectieziektebestrijding RIVM, Postbus 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, telefoon: 030 - 274 91 11; fax: 030 - 274 29 71 Collaborating institutes: Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu Postbus 1 3720 BA Bilthoven Voedsel en Waren Autoriteit Postbus 19506 2500 CM Den Haag Auteursrecht voorbehouden © 2007, Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu, Bilthoven Aan de totstandkoming van deze uitgave is de uiterste zorg besteed. Voor informatie die noch- tans onvolledig of onjuist is opgenomen, aanvaarden redactie, auteurs en uitgever geen aanspra- kelijkheid. Voor eventuele verbeteringen van de opgenomen gegevens houden zij zich gaarne aanbevolen. Alle rechten voorbehouden. Niets uit deze uitgave mag worden verveelvoudigd, opgeslagen in een geautomatiseerd gegevensbestand of openbaar gemaakt in enige vorm of op enige wijze, hetzij elektronisch, mechanisch, door fotokopieën, opnamen of enige andere manier, zonder voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van het RIVM en de uitgever. Voorzover het maken van kopieën uit deze uitgave is toegestaan op grond van artikel 16b Au-teurswet 1912 juncto het Besluit van 20 juni 1974, Stb. 351, zoals gewijzigd bij het Besluit van 23 augustus 1985, Stb. 471, en artikel 17 Auteurswet 1912, dient men de daarvoor wettelijk verschuldigde vergoed- ingen te voldoen aan de Stichting Reprorecht, Postbus 882, 1180 AW Amstelveen. Voor het over- nemen van gedeelten uit deze uitgave in bloemlezingen, readers en andere compilatiewerken (artikel 16 Auteurswet 1912) dient men zich tot de uitgever te wenden.
    [Show full text]