The George Adamson Wildlife Preservation Trust R E P O R T F R O M T H T
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
MARA CHEETAH CUBS REPORT Cee4life
MARA CHEETAH CUBS REPORT Risk of Local Extinction of Cheetah in the Mara Ecosystem, Animal Welfare Issue at Nairobi Orphanage and Alleged Illegal Cub Trade in Kenya A Report on the Mara Cheetah Cubs Removal, the Critical Status of Mara Cheetah and the Ethics of Captive Care Facilitated and par-cipated in by: cee4life MARA CHEETAH CUBS REPORT Risk of Local Extinction of Cheetah in the Mara Ecosystem, Animal Welfare Issue at Nairobi Orphanage and Alleged Illegal Cub Trade in Kenya Facilitated and par-cipated in by: cee4life.org Melbourne Victoria, Australia +61409522054 http://www.cee4life.org/ [email protected] 2 Contents Section 1 Introduction!!!!!!!! !!1.1 Location!!!!!!!!5 !!1.2 Methods!!!!!!!!5! Section 2 Cheetahs Status in Kenya!! ! ! ! ! !!2.1 Cheetah Status in Kenya!!!!!!5 !!2.2 Cheetah Status in the Masai Mara!!!!!6 !!2.3 Mara Cheetah Population Decline!!!!!7 Section 3 Mara Cub Rescue!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!3.1 Abandoned Cub Rescue!!!!!!9 !!3.2 The Mother Cheetah!!!!!!10 !!3.3 Initial Capture & Protocols!!!!!!11 !!3.4 Rehabilitation Program Design!!!!!11 !!3.5 Human Habituation Issue!!!!!!13 Section 4 Mara Cub Removal!!!!!!! !!4.1 The Relocation of the Cubs Animal Orphanage!!!15! !!4.2 The Consequence of the Mara Cub Removal!!!!16 !!4.3 The Truth Behind the Mara Cub Removal!!!!16 !!4.4 Past Captive Cheetah Advocations!!!!!18 Section 5 Cheetah Rehabilitation!!!!!!! !!5.1 Captive Wild Release of Cheetahs!!!!!19 !!5.2 Historical Cases of Cheetah Rehabilitation!!!!19 !!5.3 Cheetah Rehabilitation in Kenya!!!!!20 Section 6 KWS Justifications -
KO RA N Ationalpark, Asako Village,Kenya
A B K George Adamson loved Kora as one of the last true y O T s wildernesses in Kenya. Inaccessible, thorny and o boiling hot as it was, it was ideal refuge for him, n a R y his lions and his ideals although he was under F k enormous pressure from Somali tribesmen, their i A t stock and their guns. Ultimately he fell to their z o j guns, but that was something we were both o h N prepared to accept for the privilege of the way of n v life there and what we were able to achieve. a i George desperately wanted me to continue his l t l work there and to make sure that all our efforts George Adamson’s camp, rebuilt by GAWPT a i had not been in vain. It was out of the question at o the time as the politics then were in disarray and I g n had taken on The Mkomazi Project in Tanzania in e George’s name, which was and still is a difficult a and time-consuming task with never an end in , sight. l K P Times have changed. Domestic stock is still a e problem in Kora with on going pastoral incursions. a n But the Kenya Wildlife Services (KWS) are r y determined to rehabilitate Kora as part of the k Meru conservation area. They have a multi- a , disciplinary approach to the problem and we are George Adamson at Kora 1987 . confident that they will make it work. Poaching of – Photographers International the large mammals has abated almost completely. -
The Status of Kenya's Elephants
The status of Kenya’s elephants 1990–2002 C. Thouless, J. King, P. Omondi, P. Kahumbu, I. Douglas-Hamilton The status of Kenya’s elephants 1990–2002 © 2008 Save the Elephants Save the Elephants PO Box 54667 – 00200 Nairobi, Kenya first published 2008 edited by Helen van Houten and Dali Mwagore maps by Clair Geddes Mathews and Philip Miyare layout by Support to Development Communication CONTENTS Acknowledgements iv Abbreviations iv Executive summary v Map of Kenya viii 1. Introduction 1 2. Survey techniques 4 3. Data collection for this report 7 4. Tsavo 10 5. Amboseli 17 6. Mara 22 7. Laikipia–Samburu 28 8. Meru 36 9. Mwea 41 10. Mt Kenya (including Imenti Forest) 42 11. Aberdares 47 12. Mau 51 13. Mt Elgon 52 14. Marsabit 54 15. Nasolot–South Turkana–Rimoi–Kamnarok 58 16. Shimba Hills 62 17. Kilifi District (including Arabuko-Sokoke) 67 18. Northern (Wajir, Moyale, Mandera) 70 19. Eastern (Lamu, Garissa, Tana River) 72 20. North-western (around Lokichokio) 74 Bibliography 75 Annexes 83 The status of Kenya’s elephants 1990–2002 AcKnowledgemenTs This report is the product of collaboration between Save the Elephants and Kenya Wildlife Service. We are grateful to the directors of KWS in 2002, Nehemiah Rotich and Joseph Kioko, and the deputy director of security at that time, Abdul Bashir, for their support. Many people have contributed to this report and we are extremely grateful to them for their input. In particular we would like to thank KWS field personnel, too numerous to mention by name, who facilitated our access to field records and provided vital information and insight into the status of elephants in their respective areas. -
Park Fees 2020/21 Download
TANZANIA NATIONAL PARKS TARIFFS From 1ST August 2020 to 30TH June 2021 EA Citizen Non-EA Citizen Expatriates/ (TShs) (US$) Residents Living in Tanzania (US$) A. CONSERVATION FEES PER PERSON Serengeti National Park Of or above the age of 16 years 10,000 60 30 Between the age of 5 and 15 years 2,000 20 10 Children below the age of 5 years Free Free Free Kilimanjaro National Park Of or above the age of 16 years 10,000 70 35 Between the age of 5 and 15 years 2,000 20 10 Children below the age of 5 years Free Free Free Lake Manyara, Tarangire and Arusha National Parks Of or above the age of 16 years 10,000 45 22.5 Between the age of 5 and 15 year 2,000 15 7.5 Children below the age of 5 years Free Free Free Mikumi, Ruaha, Rubondo Island, Saadani, Kitulo, Mkomazi, Udzungwa Mountains, Katavi, Burigi- Chato, Ibanda-Kyerwa, Rumanyika-Karagwe & Saanane Island National Parks Of or above the age of 16 years 5,000 30 15 Between the age of 5 and 15 years 2,000 10 5 Children below the age of 5 years Free Free Free Gombe National Park Of or above the age of 16 years 10,000 100 50 Between the age of 5 and 15 years 2,000 20 10 Children below the age of 5 years Free Free Free Mahale National Park Of or above the age of 16 years 5,000 80 40 Between the age of 5 and 15 years 2,000 20 10 Children below the age of 5 years Free Free Free Nyerere National Park Of or above the age of 16 years 5,000 50 50 Between the age of 5 and 15 years 3,000 30 30 Children below the age of 5 years Free Free Free Ugalla River and Kigosi National Parks Of or above the age of 16 years 4,000 20 20 Between the age of 5 and 15 years 2,000 10 10 Children below the age of 5 years Free Free Free B. -
Coastal Profile for Tanzania Mainland 2014 District Volume II Including Threats Prioritisation
Coastal Profile for Tanzania Mainland 2014 District Volume II Including Threats Prioritisation Investment Prioritisation for Resilient Livelihoods and Ecosystems in Coastal Zones of Tanzania List of Contents List of Contents ......................................................................................................................................... ii List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................. x List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................... xiii Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................... xiv Table of Units ....................................................................................................................................... xviii 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 19 Coastal Areas ...................................................................................................................................... 19 Vulnerable Areas under Pressure ..................................................................................................................... 19 Tanzania........................................................................................................................................................... -
Things to Do from Kili Villa
THINGS TO DO FROM KILI VILLA Staying in Kili Villa as a home base gives you various options for day trips into nature, culture and relaxing or more sportive activities. Go out for more beautiful nature, some fun and new experiences and come back home to retire to the campfire. NATURE • Arusha National Park, including Ngurdoto Crater and Momela Lakes 30 min • Mount Kilimanjaro National Park 90 min • Tarangire National Park 120 min • Mkomazi National Park 120 min • South Amboseli / West Kilimanjaro 90 min Enduimet Wildlife Management area • Lake Manjara 90 min Arusha National Park Mount Kilimanjaro National Park Tarangire National Park Mkomazi National Park Lake Manjara RELAXING Lake Duluti - is a small crater lake only 30 minutes drive from Kili Villa. It’s a sanctuary nature trail lake with over 130 different bird species including osprey, buzzards, kingfishers, eagles, storks, doves and babets. The forest around this Lake is also home to many reptiles such as different snakes and lizards. Canoeing with professional Guides is a great experience. Waterfall Kilasia or Kinukamori at the foothills of Mount Kilimanjaro. Its crystal clear water originates in the natural springs of volcanic rocks on Kilimanjaro. This picturesque spot is great for swimming or just relaxing and enjoying the refreshing breeze from the waterfall. The 2 hour drive through Moshi will take us to Marangu Village, where a short 20 minute hike will bring you to the Kinukamori Waterfall. Along the way you will pass thru beautiful forest past tall Eucalyptus trees among many others. At Kinukamori a picnic lunch can be served. -
Meru Conservation Area Management Plan, 2007-2017
Meru Conservation Area Management Plan, 2007-2017 www.kws.org Meru Conservation Area Management Plan, 2007- 2017 Planning carried out by MCA Managers MCA Stakeholders KWS Biodiversity Planning Department In accordance with the KWS PROTECTED AREAS PLANNING FRAMEWORK ii This General Management Plan has been developed through a participatory planning process involving a cross section of Meru Conservation Area stakeholders, under the coordination of a Core Planning Team comprising representatives from Meru Conservation Area PA managers, KWS HQ planners, and County Councils of Isiolo and Mwingi officials. Funding for the planning process has been provided by KWS with co-financing from the African Wildlife Foundation. Planning technical assistance and facilita- tion was provided by the Conservation Development Centre, Nairobi iii Approval Page The Board of Trustees and the management of the Kenya Wildlife Service, have approved the implementation of this management plan for the Meru Conservation Area. Mr Julius Kipng’etich Mr. Daniel Ndonye Director Chairman, Board of Trustees iv Foreword When future generations of Kenyans look back on protected area conservation in our nation at the beginning of the 21 st Century, they are likely to view this as an era of enormous challenges alongside unprecedented opportunities. On the opportunity front, they are likely to note the incredible advances in technology that are underway, which has enabled global travel to become affordable for a much larger number of people worldwide, and which has fuelled a rapid expansion in tourism in our national parks and reserves. Other technological advances, such as the Internet, are having an enormous impact, not only by making information about Kenya’s unique protected areas easily available world- wide, but also by facilitating enhanced management of even the more remote protected areas, through easier communications and better management systems. -
The Reptiles of Mkomazi National Park, Tanzania an Updated Checklist with Some Aspects of Biogeography
Journal of East African Natural History 108(2): 81–98 (2019) THE REPTILES OF MKOMAZI NATIONAL PARK, TANZANIA AN UPDATED CHECKLIST WITH SOME ASPECTS OF BIOGEOGRAPHY Glory W. Summay, Kevin E. Lyakurwa Mkomazi National Park P.O. Box 41, Same, Tanzania [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] John V. Lyakurwa, Chacha Werema Department of Zoology and Wildlife Conservation, University of Dar es Salaam P.O. Box 35064, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania [email protected]; [email protected] Tito J. Lanoy Department of Wildlife, College of African Wildlife Management P. O Box 3031, Moshi, Tanzania [email protected] Raymond E. Okick Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute P.O Box 661, Arusha, Tanzania [email protected] ABSTRACT The Mkomazi National Park (MNP) is a protected area representing three major biomes, yet it remains poorly known from a herpetological perspective. Intensive surveys for reptiles were carried out in the MNP during dry and wet seasons in 2018, with the main focus of updating the existing data and assessing the influence of the three biomes on the park’s species composition. Various methods were used to document 55 species, most of which were found during the dry season. The checklist of reptiles of MNP is now updated to 73 species, 97% of which are typical of the Somalia-Maasai biome, equivalent to 54% of all Somalia-Maasai biome species in Tanzania. The MNP was found to be the most discordant in species composition from the contiguous Pare and Usambara Mountains, the latter two areas harbouring Afromontane forest-dependent species. -
Northern Tanzania Wildlife Safari
Northern Tanzania Wildlife Safari August 7 -18, 2021, with extension Aug. 18-21 The Great Migration of the Serengeti is surely one of the world’s most spectacular wildlife phenomena. Equally impressive are the self-contained ecosystem of Ngorongoro Crater and the diverse habitats of Tarangire National Park. This safari con- centrates on these wildlife-rich areas so that you get more observation time and less travel than a trip that tries to cover too many areas superficially. Your leaders know these areas well and can give you the very best experience possible. We also offer a wonderful short extension to Mkomazi National Park, which you should consider if you have the time and resources to do so, as it is a different ecosystem with mammals (e.g., wild dogs) and birds unlikely to be seen elsewhere. Our January-February safari focuses on the short-grass plains of the southern Serengeti, but at this time of year, the action is in the north, especially along the Mara River, where we should have a good chance to see the dramatic river-crossings of the herds and plenty of predators. It’s the dry season in parks like Tarangire, so the river and marshes there attract large numbers of animals, both predator and prey. If an African safari could be a once-in-a-lifetime experience for you, then make it the best! And do it with expert leadership, people who know the patterns and behaviors of wildlife—who not only can find and spot the wildlife but who also can provide the rich details of context that makes this more than merely accumulating lists. -
Black Rhino Conservation in Tanzania: Translocation Efforts and Further Challenges
Black rhino conservation in Tanzania: translocation efforts and further challenges Robert D. Fyumagwa1*, Julius W. Nyahongo2 1Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute (TAWIRI), P. O. Box 661, Arusha, Tanzania; email: [email protected] 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Dodoma, P. O. Box 259 Dodoma, Tanzania; e-mail: [email protected] *Corresponding author Abstract Tanzania had many black rhinos (Diceros bicornis) in the 1960s but was hit by ruthless poaching between the 1970s and late 1980s. From the 1990s, the country declared a war against unscrupulous poachers in order to conserve the few remaining rhinos. The current strategy is to reintroduce black rhinos that were originally from East Africa in order to increase genetic diversity. Three translocations of black rhinos between 1997 and 2001 involved 10 animals from South Africa, two of which were reintroduced to Ngorongoro Crater and eight to Mkomazi National Park. In 2007, two black rhinos from Port Lympne Wild Animal Park, UK, were introduced into a sanctuary adjacent to Ikorongo-Grumeti Game Reserves. In June 2009, three black rhinos from the Czech Republic were translocated to Mkomazi National Park. Another translocation operation is expected to begin in May 2010 whereby 32 black rhinos will be translocated into the Serengeti ecosystem from Thaba Tholo, Thabazimbi, South Africa. Although the first five translocation operations went well, the challenge is the management of the reintroduced rhinos amid the growing social-ecological pressures affecting protected areas. Management authorities should consider the recommended sex ratio for rhino populations to avoid excessive male aggression. Keywords: Black rhinos, conservation, poaching, translocation Résumé La Tanzanie avait beaucoup de rhinocéros noirs (Diceros bicornis) dans les années 1960 mais elle a été touchée par un braconnage impitoyable entre les années 1970 et la fin des années 1980. -
Northern Tanzania Wildlife Safari
Northern Tanzania Wildlife Safari August 22 – September 2, 2021, with extension Sept. 2-5 The Great Migration of the Serengeti is surely one of the world’s most spectacular wildlife phenomena. Equally impressive are the self-contained ecosystem of Ngorongoro Crater and the diverse habitats of Tarangire National Park. This safari con- centrates on these wildlife-rich areas so that you get more observation time and less travel than a trip that tries to cover too many areas superficially. Your leaders know these areas well and can give you the very best experience possible. We also offer a wonderful short extension to Mkomazi National Park, which you should consider if you have the time and resources to do so, as it is a different ecosystem with mammals (e.g., wild dogs) and birds unlikely to be seen elsewhere. Our January-February safari focuses on the short-grass plains of the southern Serengeti, but at this time of year, the action is in the north, especially along the Mara River, where we should have a good chance to see the dramatic river-crossings of the herds and plenty of predators. It’s the dry season in parks like Tarangire, so the river and marshes there attract large numbers of animals, both predator and prey. If an African safari could be a once-in-a-lifetime experience for you, then make it the best! And do it with expert leadership, people who know the patterns and behaviors of wildlife—who not only can find and spot the wildlife but who also can provide the rich details of context that makes this more than merely accumulating lists. -
Profile on Environmental and Social Considerations in Tanzania
Profile on Environmental and Social Considerations in Tanzania September 2011 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) CRE CR(5) 11-011 Table of Content Chapter 1 General Condition of United Republic of Tanzania ........................ 1-1 1.1 General Condition ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Location and Topography ............................................................. 1-1 1.1.2 Weather ........................................................................................ 1-3 1.1.3 Water Resource ............................................................................ 1-3 1.1.4 Political/Legal System and Governmental Organization ............... 1-4 1.2 Policy and Regulation for Environmental and Social Considerations .. 1-4 1.3 Governmental Organization ................................................................ 1-6 1.4 Outline of Ratification/Adaptation of International Convention ............ 1-7 1.5 NGOs acting in the Environmental and Social Considerations field .... 1-9 1.6 Trend of Aid Agency .......................................................................... 1-14 1.7 Local Knowledgeable Persons (Consultants).................................... 1-15 Chapter 2 Natural Environment .................................................................. 2-1 2.1 General Condition ............................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Wildlife Species ..................................................................................