DOCSLIB.ORG

Meshpipe: a Python-Based Tool for Easy Automation and Demonstration of Geometry Processing Pipelines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Meshpipe: a Python-Based Tool for Easy Automation and Demonstration of Geometry Processing Pipelines MeshPipe: A Python-based Tool for Easy Automation and Demonstration of Geometry Processing Pipelines Joan Fons, Antoni Chica a and Carlos Andujar b ViRVIG, Universitat Politecnica` de Cataluna, Barcelona, Spain Keywords: Geometry Processing, Polygonal Meshes. Abstract: The popularization of inexpensive 3D scanning, 3D printing, 3D publishing and AR/VR display technologies have renewed the interest in open-source tools providing the geometry processing algorithms required to clean, repair, enrich, optimize and modify point-based and polygonal-based models. Nowadays, there is a large variety of such open-source tools whose user community includes 3D experts but also 3D enthusiasts and professionals from other disciplines. In this paper we present a Python-based tool that addresses two major caveats of current solutions: the lack of easy-to-use methods for the creation of custom geometry processing pipelines (automation), and the lack of a suitable visual interface for quickly testing, comparing and sharing different pipelines, supporting rapid iterations and providing dynamic feedback to the user (demonstration). From the user’s point of view, the tool is a 3D viewer with an integrated Python console from which internal or external Python code can be executed. We provide an easy-to-use but powerful API for element selection and geometry processing. Key algorithms are provided by a high-level C++ library exposed to the viewer via Python-C++ bindings. Unlike competing open-source alternatives, our tool has a minimal learning curve and typical pipelines can be written in a few lines of Python code. 1 INTRODUCTION photos and then using open-source MVS+SfM tools such as COLMAP (Schonberger¨ and Frahm, 2016; Point-based and polygonal-based models are the cen- Schonberger¨ et al., 2016). However, the resulting tral part of an increasing number of popular applica- model will include background objects that have to tions including 3D scanning (e.g. via photogramme- be removed and missing parts that have to be re- try tools), 3D modeling (e.g. Blender, Tinkercad), 3D paired. If a high-quality setting was used, the model printing services, 3D publishing tools (e.g. Sketch- will also require some optimizations (simplification, Fab) and desktop-based or AR/VR-based interactive normal mapping) to be ready for publication. Dif- applications. ferent applications often require different processing The availability of free or low-cost options for pipelines, although it makes sense for users to share these technologies have significantly increased their ready-to-use pipelines for specific tasks. user base, in areas such as art, architecture, cultural Today, there are many open-source libraries and heritage, construction and entertainment. This means tools supporting geometry processing. Some exam- that a growing number of users are not 3D model- ples we review in the next section are CGAL, VCG, ing/3D processing experts, but 3D enthusiasts, 3D PMP, PCL and libigl (libraries) and MeshLab, Mesh- hobbyists and professionals from other disciplines. Mixer and OpenFlipper (applications). A common requirement in all applications above The libraries above provide efficient imple- is the need to perform some geometry processing mentations of common geometry processing algo- on the 3D models before they become useful for rithms (analysis, repairing, simplification, remeshing, the target application. Consider for example a cul- smoothing, parameterization...) and obviously excel tural heritage project for digitizing and publishing in terms of automation. Unfortunately, they have a an art work. A 3D model can be created by taking substantial entry barrier for non-experts, and most of them require compilation, which makes it difficult to a https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7519-2201 iterate different pipelines or experimenting with as- b https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8480-4713 sociated parameters. Some libraries have been com- 71 Fons, J., Chica, A. and Andujar, C. MeshPipe: A Python-based Tool for Easy Automation and Demonstration of Geometry Processing Pipelines. DOI: 10.5220/0008935900710082 In Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (VISIGRAPP 2020), pages 71-82 ISBN: 978-989-758-402-2 Copyright c 2020 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved GRAPP 2020 - 15th International Conference on Computer Graphics Theory and Applications piled into JavaScript (e.g. MeshLabJS, PMP) to run in a browser, but these incur a substantial performance penalty and still require some background on geome- try processing. Besides libraries, open-source tools provide a graphical user-interface and thus offer immediate feedback on the geometry processing operations be- ing applied. The main drawback is the lack of au- tomation features. Some tools do offer automation (e.g. MeshLab), but filters have an overly long in- terface and iterating with different pipelines is not Figure 1: Intended usage of the Meshpipe viewer: side by straightforward. Automation is key for applying the side with a text editor. same pipeline to a collection of similar models (e.g. scanned objects with similar properties). Another is- tion 2 reviews related work on geometry processing sue is the size limitations when it comes to process software and libraries. Sections 3 and 4 describe the huge models such as those produced with 3D scan- design of the C++/Python API and the 3D viewer. Im- ning pipelines. First, most open-source tools require plementation details are given in Section 5. Section 6 the model to be kept in-core. Second, even if fits shows further script samples and results. Finally, Sec- in core memory, some operations like face selection tion 7 concludes the paper and outlines future work. (cleaning) or mesh parameterization (texturing) take a substantial amount of time on huge models. Try- ing different pipelines on a simplified version is an option, but some steps (e.g. face selection) cannot 2 PREVIOUS WORK be reused on a different mesh and thus working with huge meshes is a tedious task. Finally, some of these The variety of tools and libraries that cover the geo- tools have been designed for 3D professionals (e.g. metric processing of 3D models is quite wide. Some Blender, MeshLab) and thus require some training. features are common to most of them (such as simpli- fication). Others are only found in a subset of them. In this paper we propose a tool to overcome these Some tools serve to expose functionalities of a spe- limitations. We support the fast creation, re-use and cific library. In any case, the goal of tools is not the sharing of custom geometry processing pipelines (au- same as that of libraries. In the following two sub- tomation) through a simple high-level Python API. sections we analyze several of the available tools and We make extensive use of default parameters to sim- libraries. plify the use by non-experts. We also provide a pow- erful element selection mechanism so that any algo- 2.1 Tools rithm (deleting, smoothing, simplifying...) can be ap- plied to the desired part. Meshmixer The tool itself is a 3D viewer with an inte- grated Python console from which internal or external Meshmixer is a closed source software owned by Au- Python code can be executed (see Figure 1). Process- todesk. Its main focus is to provide tools for mesh ing operations can be also selected via the GUI, which processing and ”clay-like” sculpting. It has a very automatically inserts the Python call with appropriate powerful set of tools and a 3D viewport that helps the parameters. User interactions such as lasso selections user visualize the mesh properties as well as perform can be saved and reused on a different version (e.g. all sorts of modification tasks. higher quality) of the model. Custom pipelines can Over the last year it has incorporated many fea- be created with any editor, and the tool keeps track tures related to 3D printing, such as support genera- of changes to automatically load the pipeline. This tion for manufacturing processes and integration with way we support rapid iterations while providing dy- various 3D printer models in order to provide a one- namic feedback to the user (demonstration). In or- click setup to start the prints. However, there is no der to maximize performance, key data structures and support for any kind of automation or scripting. algorithms are implemented in C++, and accessible via Python-C++ bindings. The library in turn pro- MeshLab vides typical geometry processing algorithms through feature-rich libraries such as PMP and PCL. Meshlab (Cignoni et al., 2008) is a free and open The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Sec- source tool built upon VCGlib 2.2 that excels in the 72 MeshPipe: A Python-based Tool for Easy Automation and Demonstration of Geometry Processing Pipelines acquisition and reconstruction of meshes. It has great processing and displaying of triangular and tetrahe- tools for working with 3D scanned data and for ob- dral meshes. Its functionalities include simplification, taining a clean and usable mesh from it. Additionally, smoothing, parameterization, reconstruction, and sev- there is a web based variant called MeshLabJS, that eral others. The library is also well known because of replicates many of the features found in the original its use in The Digital Michelangelo Project. software in a web browser environment, thus requir- ing no local installation. CGAL Unlike Meshmixer, this tool introduces the con- cept of ”filter scripts” which allow the user to define a The Computational Geometry Algorithms Library processing pipeline to be reused in as many meshes as (CGAL) is by far the most extensive open library in needed. However, these pipelines are fixed, they only the context of computational geometry. The project contain a list of predefined steps and parameters and is developed via a collaborative effort from a commu- there is no possibility of changing them depending on nity of developers working at research institutes, uni- the properties of the mesh.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Openscad User Manual (PDF)
    OpenSCAD User Manual Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Additional Resources 1.2 History 2 The OpenSCAD User Manual 3 The OpenSCAD Language Reference 4 Work in progress 5 Contents 6 Chapter 1 -- First Steps 6.1 Compiling and rendering our first model 6.2 See also 6.3 See also 6.3.1 There is no semicolon following the translate command 6.3.2 See Also 6.3.3 See Also 6.4 CGAL surfaces 6.5 CGAL grid only 6.6 The OpenCSG view 6.7 The Thrown Together View 6.8 See also 6.9 References 7 Chapter 2 -- The OpenSCAD User Interface 7.1 User Interface 7.1.1 Viewing area 7.1.2 Console window 7.1.3 Text editor 7.2 Interactive modification of the numerical value 7.3 View navigation 7.4 View setup 7.4.1 Render modes 7.4.1.1 OpenCSG (F9) 7.4.1.1.1 Implementation Details 7.4.1.2 CGAL (Surfaces and Grid, F10 and F11) 7.4.1.2.1 Implementation Details 7.4.2 View options 7.4.2.1 Show Edges (Ctrl+1) 7.4.2.2 Show Axes (Ctrl+2) 7.4.2.3 Show Crosshairs (Ctrl+3) 7.4.3 Animation 7.4.4 View alignment 7.5 Dodecahedron 7.6 Icosahedron 7.7 Half-pyramid 7.8 Bounding Box 7.9 Linear Extrude extended use examples 7.9.1 Linear Extrude with Scale as an interpolated function 7.9.2 Linear Extrude with Twist as an interpolated function 7.9.3 Linear Extrude with Twist and Scale as interpolated functions 7.10 Rocket 7.11 Horns 7.12 Strandbeest 7.13 Previous 7.14 Next 7.14.1 Command line usage 7.14.2 Export options 7.14.2.1 Camera and image output 7.14.3 Constants 7.14.4 Command to build required files 7.14.5 Processing all .scad files in a folder 7.14.6 Makefile example 7.14.6.1 Automatic
    [Show full text]
  • Geometry & Computation for Interactive Simulation
    Geometry & Computation for Interactive Simulation Jorg Peters (CISE University of Florida, USA), Dinesh Pai (University of British Columbia), Ulrich Reif (Technische Universitaet Darmstadt) Sep 24 – Sep 29, 2017 1 Overview The workshop advanced the state of the art in geometry and computation for interactive simulation by in- troducing to each other researchers from different branches of academia, research labs and industry. These researchers share the common goal of improving the interface between geometry and computation for physi- cal simulation – but approach it with differing emphasis, techniques and toolkits. A key issue for all partici- pants is to shorten process times and to improve the outcomes of the design-analysis cycle. That is, to more quickly optimize shape, structure and properties to achieve one or multiple design goals. Correspondingly, the challenges laid out covered a wide spectrum from hierarchical design and prediction of novel 3D printed materials, to multi-objective optimization minimizing fuel consumption of commercial airplanes, to creating training scenarios for minimally invasive surgery, to multi-point interactive force feedback for virtually plac- ing an engine into a restricted cavity. These challenges map to challenges in the underlying areas of geometry processing, computational geometry, geometric design, formulation of simulation models, isogeometric and higher-order isoparametric design with splines and meshingless approaches, to real-time computation for interactive surgical force-feedback simulation. The workshop was highly succesful in presenting and con- trasting this rich set of techniques. And it generated recommendations for educating future generation of researchers in geometry and computation for interactive simulation (see outcomes). The lower than usual number of participants (due to a second series of earth quakes just before the meeting) allowed for increased length of individual presentations, so as to discuss topics and ideas at length, and to address basics theory.
    [Show full text]
  • An Adaptable and Extensible Geometry Kernel
    An Adaptable and Extensible Geometry Kernel ¾ ¿ Susan Hert ½ , Michael Hoffmann , Lutz Kettner , ½ Sylvain Pion , and Michael Seel ½ Max-Planck-Institut fur ¨ Informatik, Stuhlsatzenhausweg 85 66123 Saarbrucken, ¨ Germany. Email: [hert|seel]@mpi-sb.mpg.de. ¾ Institute for Theoretical Computer Science, ETH Zurich, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland. Email: [email protected]. ¿ University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA. Email: [email protected]. INRIA, Sophia Antipolis - France. Email: [email protected]. Abstract. Geometric algorithms are based on geometric objects such as points, lines and circles. The term kernel refers to a collection of representations for constant- size geometric objects and operations on these representations. This paper describes how such a geometry kernel can be designed and implemented in C++, having spe- cial emphasis on adaptability, extensibility and efficiency. We achieve these goals fol- lowing the generic programming paradigm and using templates as our tools. These ideas are realized and tested in CGAL [10], the Computational Geometry Algorithms Library. Keywords: Computational geometry, library design, generic programming. 1 Introduction Geometric algorithms that manipulate constant-size objects such as circles, lines, and points are usually described independent of any particular representation of the ob- jects. It is assumed that these objects have certain operations defined on them and that simple predicates exist that can be used, for example, to compare two objects or to determine their relative position. Algorithms are described in this way because all representations are equally valid as far as the correctness of an algorithm is concerned. Also, algorithms can be more concisely described and are more easily seen as being applicable in many settings when they are described in this more generic way.
    [Show full text]
  • Openscad User Manual/Print Version Table of Contents Introduction First
    OpenSCAD User Manual/Print version Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. First Steps 3. The OpenSCAD User Interface 4. The OpenSCAD Language 1. General 2. Mathematical Operators 3. Mathematical Functions 4. String Functions 5. Primitive Solids 6. Transformations 7. Conditional and Iterator Functions 8. CSG Modelling 9. Modifier Characters 10. Modules 11. Include Statement 12. Other Language Feature 5. Using the 2D Subsystem 1. 2D Primitives 2. 3D to 2D Projection 3. 2D to 2D Extrusion 4. DXF Extrusion 5. Other 2D formats 6. STL Import and Export 1. STL Import 2. STL Export 7. Commented Example Projects 8. Using OpenSCAD in a command line environment 9. Building OpenSCAD from Sources 1. Building on Linux/UNIX 2. Cross-compiling for Windows on Linux or Mac OS X 3. Building on Windows 4. Building on Mac OS X 10. Libraries 11. Glossary 12. Index Introduction OpenSCAD is a software for creating solid 3D CAD objects. It is free software (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) and available for GNU/Linux (http://www.gnu.org/) , MS Windows and Apple OS X. Unlike most free software for creating 3D models (such as the well-known application Blender (http://www.blender.org/) ), OpenSCAD does not focus on the artistic aspects of 3D modelling, but instead focuses on the CAD aspects. So it might be the application you are looking for when you are planning to create 3D models of machine parts, but probably is not what you are looking for when you are more interested in creating computer- animated movies. OpenSCAD is not an interactive modeller.
    [Show full text]
  • New Approaches to Protein Docking
    New approaches to protein docking Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades Doktor der Ingenieurwissenschaften (Dr.-Ing.) der Naturwissenschaftlich-Technischen Fakult¨at I der Universit¨at des Saarlandes von Oliver Kohlbacher Saarbr¨ucken 12. Januar 2001 Datum des Kolloquiums: 12. Januar 2000 Dekan der technischen Fakult¨at: Professor Dr. Rainer Schulze-Pillot-Ziemen Gutachter: Professor Dr. Hans-Peter Lenhof, Universit¨at des Saarlandes, Saarbr¨ucken Professor Dr. Kurt Mehlhorn, MPI f¨ur Informatik, Saarbr¨ucken 2 Á ØÒ Ø ÑÓ×Ø Ü ÔÙØÖ Ö× ÒÓÛ × ÔÖØÐÝ Ò ÖÓ ¸ Ò ÔÖØÐÝ Ò ØÓ Ó Ñ×ØÖݺ º º º ÓÐÓÝ × ×Ó Øи Ò ÙØ Ù×Ùк Ì ØÖÓÙÐ ÛØ ÓÐÓÝ × Øظ ÝÓÙ Ú ØÓ ÛÓÖ × ÓÐÓ×ظ Ø³× ÓÖÒº ÓÙÖ ÜÔ ÖÑÒØ× Ø ÝÓÙ ØÖ ÝÖ× Ò ØÒ¸ ÓÒ Òظ Ø Ý Ó × Ó« Ò ÐÐ Ø ØÒ× ÓÙ ×ØÖØ ÓÚÖº ÁÒ Û ÓÙÖ ÓÛÒ ÛÓÖÐ׺ ÓÐÓ×Ø× ×ÖÚ ÐÓØ Ó ÓÖ Ò Ð ØÓ ×ÐÙ Ø ØÖÓÙº – Donald Knuth Acknowledgements The work on this thesis was carried out during the years 1996–2000 at the Max-Planck- Institut f¨ur Informatik in the group of Prof. Dr. Kurt Mehlhorn under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Hans-Peter Lenhof. Prof. Dr. Hans-Peter Lenhof kindled my interest in Bioinformatics and gave me the freedom to do research in those areas that fascinated me most. Our discussions, although sometimes heated, were always fruitful and forced me to get to the very bottom of many problems. The implementation of BALL is unthinkable without the help of all the people who con- tributed code and ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficient Computation of Clipped Voronoi Diagram for Mesh Generation
    Efficient Computation of Clipped Voronoi Diagram for Mesh Generation Dong-Ming Yana,b,c, Wenping Wanga, Bruno L´evyb, Yang Liub,d aDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong bProject ALICE, INRIA/LORIA, Campus scientifique 615, rue du Jardin Botanique, 54600, Villers les Nancy, France cGeometric Modeling and Scientific Visualization Center, KAUST, Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia dMicrosoft Research Asia, Building 2, No. 5 Danling Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100800, P.R. China Abstract The Voronoi diagram is a fundamental geometric structure widely used in various fields, especially in computer graphics and geometry computing. For a set of points in a compact domain (i.e. a bounded and closed 2D region or a 3D volume), some Voronoi cells of their Voronoi diagram are infinite or partially outside of the domain, but in practice only the parts of the cells inside the domain are needed, as when computing the centroidal Voronoi tessellation. Such a Voronoi diagram confined to a compact domain is called a clipped Voronoi diagram. We present an efficient algorithm to compute the clipped Voronoi diagram for a set of sites with respect to a compact 2D region or a 3D volume. We also apply the proposed method to optimal mesh generation based on the centroidal Voronoi tessellation. Keywords: clipped Voronoi diagram, Delaunay triangulation, centroidal Voronoi tessellation, mesh generation. 1. Introduction computing the clipped Voronoi diagram with re- spect to a complicated input domain is a difficult The Voronoi diagram is a fundamental geometric problem and there is no efficient solution in the ex- structure which has numerous applications in var- isting literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Cgalmesh: a Generic Framework for Delaunay Mesh Generation Clément Jamin, Pierre Alliez, Mariette Yvinec, Jean-Daniel Boissonnat
    CGALmesh: a Generic Framework for Delaunay Mesh Generation Clément Jamin, Pierre Alliez, Mariette Yvinec, Jean-Daniel Boissonnat To cite this version: Clément Jamin, Pierre Alliez, Mariette Yvinec, Jean-Daniel Boissonnat. CGALmesh: a Generic Framework for Delaunay Mesh Generation. [Research Report] RR-8256, INRIA. 2014. hal- 00796052v2 HAL Id: hal-00796052 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00796052v2 Submitted on 27 Jan 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. CGALmesh: a Generic Framework for Delaunay Mesh Generation Clément Jamin, Pierre Alliez, Mariette Yvinec, Jean-Daniel Boissonnat RESEARCH REPORT N° 8256 January 2014 Project-Teams Geometrica ISSN 0249-6399 ISRN INRIA/RR--8256--FR+ENG CGALmesh: a Generic Framework for Delaunay Mesh Generation Clément Jamin∗y, Pierre Alliez∗, Mariette Yvinec∗, Jean-Daniel Boissonnat∗ Project-Teams Geometrica Research Report n° 8256 — January 2014 — 31 pages Abstract: CGALmesh is the mesh generation software package of the Computational Geometry Algorithm Library (CGAL). It generates isotropic simplicial meshes – surface triangular meshes or volume tetrahedral meshes – from input surfaces, 3D domains as well as 3D multi-domains, with or without sharp features. The underlying meshing algorithm relies on restricted Delaunay triangulations to approximate domains and surfaces, and on Delaunay refinement to ensure both approximation accuracy and mesh quality.
    [Show full text]
  • CGAL Arrangements and Their Applications
    Geometry and Computing 7 CGAL Arrangements and Their Applications A Step-by-Step Guide Bearbeitet von Efi Fogel, Dan Halperin, Ron Wein 1. Auflage 2012. Buch. xix, 293 S. Hardcover ISBN 978 3 642 17282 3 Format (B x L): 21 x 27,9 cm Gewicht: 1023 g Weitere Fachgebiete > EDV, Informatik > Programmiersprachen: Methoden > Algorithmen & Datenstrukturen schnell und portofrei erhältlich bei Die Online-Fachbuchhandlung beck-shop.de ist spezialisiert auf Fachbücher, insbesondere Recht, Steuern und Wirtschaft. Im Sortiment finden Sie alle Medien (Bücher, Zeitschriften, CDs, eBooks, etc.) aller Verlage. Ergänzt wird das Programm durch Services wie Neuerscheinungsdienst oder Zusammenstellungen von Büchern zu Sonderpreisen. Der Shop führt mehr als 8 Millionen Produkte. Preface What This Book Contains This book is about how to use the Cgal 2D Arrangements package to solve problems. It will teach you the functionality of this package and a few related Cgal packages. Every feature of the package is demonstrated by a small example program. Even the basic tools are sufficient to solve problems, as shown in Chapter 2, which includes the first application. We use the word application here to refer to a complete standalone program (written on top of Cgal arrangements) to solve a meaningful problem. The applications presented in the book include finding the minimum-area triangle defined by a set of points, planning the motion of a polygon translating amidst poly- gons in the plane, computing the offset polygon, constructing the farthest-point Voronoi diagram, coordinating the motion of two discs moving amidst obstacles in the plane, performing Boolean set operations on curved polygons, and more.
    [Show full text]
  • Postgis 2.4.2 Manual SVN Revision
    PostGIS 2.4.2 Manual i PostGIS 2.4.2 Manual SVN Revision () PostGIS 2.4.2 Manual ii Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Project Steering Committee . .1 1.2 Core Contributors Present . .1 1.3 Core Contributors Past . .2 1.4 Other Contributors . .2 1.5 More Information . .3 2 PostGIS Installation 4 2.1 Short Version . .4 2.2 Install Requirements . .5 2.3 Getting the Source . .7 2.4 Compiling and Install from Source: Detailed . .7 2.4.1 Configuration . .7 2.4.2 Building . .9 2.4.3 Building PostGIS Extensions and Deploying them . .9 2.4.4 Testing . 11 2.4.5 Installation . 20 2.5 Creating a spatial database using EXTENSIONS . 21 2.6 Create a spatially-enabled database without using extensions . 21 2.7 Installing and Using the address standardizer . 22 2.7.1 Installing Regex::Assemble . 23 2.8 Installing, Upgrading Tiger Geocoder and loading data . 23 2.8.1 Tiger Geocoder Enabling your PostGIS database: Using Extension . 23 2.8.1.1 Converting a Tiger Geocoder Regular Install to Extension Model . 25 2.8.2 Tiger Geocoder Enabling your PostGIS database: Not Using Extensions . 26 2.8.3 Using Address Standardizer Extension with Tiger geocoder . 26 2.8.4 Loading Tiger Data . 26 2.8.5 Upgrading your Tiger Geocoder Install . 27 2.9 Create a spatially-enabled database from a template . 28 2.10 Upgrading . 28 PostGIS 2.4.2 Manual iii 2.10.1 Soft upgrade . 28 2.10.1.1 Soft Upgrade Pre 9.1+ or without extensions .
    [Show full text]
  • A Generic Framework for Delaunay Mesh Generation Clément Jamin, Pierre Alliez, Mariette Yvinec, Jean-Daniel Boissonnat
    CGALmesh: a Generic Framework for Delaunay Mesh Generation Clément Jamin, Pierre Alliez, Mariette Yvinec, Jean-Daniel Boissonnat To cite this version: Clément Jamin, Pierre Alliez, Mariette Yvinec, Jean-Daniel Boissonnat. CGALmesh: a Generic Framework for Delaunay Mesh Generation. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, Association for Computing Machinery, 2015, 41 (4), pp.24. 10.1145/2699463. hal-01071759 HAL Id: hal-01071759 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01071759 Submitted on 6 Oct 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 CGALmesh: a Generic Framework for Delaunay Mesh Generation CLEMENT JAMIN, Inria and Universite´ Lyon 1, LIRIS, UMR5205 PIERRE ALLIEZ, Inria MARIETTE YVINEC, Inria JEAN-DANIEL BOISSONNAT, Inria CGALmesh is the mesh generation software package of the Computational Geometry Algorithm Library (CGAL). It generates isotropic simplicial meshes – surface triangular meshes or volume tetrahedral meshes – from input surfaces, 3D domains as well as 3D multi-domains, with or without sharp features. The under- lying meshing algorithm relies on restricted Delaunay triangulations to approximate domains and surfaces, and on Delaunay refinement to ensure both approximation accuracy and mesh quality. CGALmesh provides guarantees on approximation quality as well as on the size and shape of the mesh elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Geometry Algorithms Library
    Introduction to the Computational Geometry Algorithms Library Monique Teillaud www.cgal.org January 2011 Overview The CGAL Open Source Project Contents of the Library Robustness Triangulations Flexibility Recent and Ongoing Work Part I The CGAL Open Source Project Goals • Promote the research in Computational Geometry (CG) • “make the large body of geometric algorithms developed in the field of CG available for industrial applications” ) robust programs History Development started in 1995 Consortium of 8 European sites Two ESPRIT LTR European Projects (1996-1999) History Development started in 1995 Consortium of 8 European sites Two ESPRIT LTR European Projects (1996-1999) Utrecht University (Plageo) INRIA Sophia Antipolis (C++GAL) ETH Zürich (XYZ Geobench) MPI Saarbrücken (LEDA) Tel Aviv University Freie Universität Berlin RISC Linz Martin-Luther-Universität Halle History • Work continued after the end of Galia (1999) in several sites (partial support of EU Projects ECG, ACS, Aim@Shape) • January, 2003: creation of GEOMETRY FACTORY INRIA startup sells commercial licenses, support, customized developments • November, 2003: Release 3.0 - Open Source Project • October, 2010: Release 3.7 License a few basic packages under LGPL most packages under QPL ◦ free use for Open Source code ◦ commercial license needed otherwise • A guarantee for CGAL users • Allows CGAL to become a “standard” • Opens CGAL for new contributions Contributions Contributors keep their identity • “People” web page. • Copyright kept by the institution of the authors. •
    [Show full text]
  • LEDA and CGAL Michael Hoffmann, Lutz Kettner and Stefan N¨Aher
    70 TWO COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY LIBRARIES: LEDA AND CGAL Michael Hoffmann, Lutz Kettner and Stefan N¨aher INTRODUCTION Over the past decades, two major software libraries that support a wide range of ge- ometric computing have been developed: Leda, the Library of Efficient Data Types and Algorithms, and Cgal, the Computational Geometry Algorithms Library. We start with an introduction of common aspects of both libraries and major differ- ences. We continue with sections that describe each library in detail. Both libraries are written in C++. Leda is based on the object-oriented par- adigm and Cgal is based on the generic programming paradigm. They provide a collection of flexible, efficient, and correct software components for computational geometry. Users should be able to easily include existing functionality into their programs. Additionally, both libraries have been designed to serve as platforms for the implementation of new algorithms. Correctness is of crucial importance for a library, even more so in the case of geometric algorithms where correctness is harder to achieve than in other areas of software construction. Two well-known reasons are the exact arithmetic assumption and the nondegeneracy assumption that are often used in geometric algorithms. However, both assumptions usually do not hold: floating point arithmetic is not exact and inputs are frequently degenerate. See Chapter 46 for details. EXACT ARITHMETIC There are basically two scientific approaches to the exact arithmetic problem. One can either design new algorithms that can cope with inexact arithmetic or one can use exact arithmetic. Instead of requiring the arithmetic itself to be exact, one can guarantee correct computations if the so-called geometric primitives are exact.
    [Show full text]