HIV-1 and HIV-2 Exhibit Divergent Interactions with HLTF and UNG2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HIV-1 and HIV-2 Exhibit Divergent Interactions with HLTF and UNG2 HIV-1 and HIV-2 exhibit divergent interactions with PNAS PLUS HLTF and UNG2 DNA repair proteins Kasia Hreckaa,1, Caili Haoa,1, Ming-Chieh Shuna, Sarabpreet Kaura, Selene K. Swansonb, Laurence Florensb, Michael P. Washburnb,c, and Jacek Skowronskia,2 aDepartment of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106; bStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110; and cDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160 Edited by Stephen P. Goff, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, and approved May 20, 2016 (received for review March 29, 2016) HIV replication in nondividing host cells occurs in the presence antiviral proteins for degradation by the proteasome (13). In of high concentrations of noncanonical dUTP, apolipoprotein B particular, Vif loads antiviral APOBEC3 family proteins onto a mRNA-editing, enzyme-catalytic, polypeptide-like 3 (APOBEC3) CRL5 E3 ubiquitin ligase for polyubiquitination and subsequent cytidine deaminases, and SAMHD1 (a cell cycle-regulated dNTP proteasome-dependent degradation (14). Vpx, encoded by the triphosphohydrolase) dNTPase, which maintains low concentra- HIV-2/simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) SIVsm lineage of tions of canonical dNTPs in these cells. These conditions favor primate lentiviruses, and closely related Vpr proteins from a the introduction of marks of DNA damage into viral cDNA, and subset of SIV viruses isolated from various primate species, thereby prime it for processing by DNA repair enzymes. Accessory counteract SAMHD1-mediated restriction (6, 7, 11). Specifically, protein Vpr, found in all primate lentiviruses, and its HIV-2/simian Vpx binds to the DCAF1 substrate receptor subunit of the immunodeficiency virus (SIV) SIVsm paralogue Vpx, hijack the CRL4DCAF1 E3 ubiquitin ligase and loads SAMHD1 onto this CRL4DCAF1 E3 ubiquitin ligase to alleviate some of these conditions, enzyme, thereby targeting it for degradation (15). Although HIV-1 but the extent of their interactions with DNA repair proteins has does not counteract SAMHD1 directly, it was proposed to bypass not been thoroughly characterized. Here, we identify HLTF, a post- the SAMHD1-imposed restriction as a result of a more efficient replication DNA repair helicase, as a common target of HIV-1/ reverse transcriptase that can synthesize viral cDNA in a low-dNTP SIVcpz Vpr proteins. We show that HIV-1 Vpr reprograms environment (16). The failure of the aforementioned viral coun- DCAF1 CRL4 E3 to direct HLTF for proteasome-dependent degrada- termeasures flags HIV cDNA for processing by DNA repair tion independent from previously reported Vpr interactions with enzymes, which, if not successfully completed in a low-dNTP base excision repair enzyme uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG2) and environment set up by SAMHD1, could lead to the initiation of crossover junction endonuclease MUS81, which Vpr also directs an innate response to viral nucleic acids, increased HIV-1 mu- for degradation via CRL4DCAF1 E3. Thus, separate functions of – DCAF1 tation rate, and/or inhibition of HIV-1 infection (17 19). HIV-1 Vpr usurp CRL4 E3 to remove key enzymes in three Vpr, a paralogue of Vpx found in all primate lentiviruses, coor- DNA repair pathways. In contrast, we find that HIV-2 Vpr is unable dinates interactions with postreplication DNA repair machinery, to efficiently program HLTF or UNG2 for degradation. Our find- whose role for the replication cycle of primate lentiviruses is not MICROBIOLOGY ings reveal complex interactions between HIV-1 and the DNA re- well understood. Early studies revealed that HIV-1 Vpr modulates pair machinery, suggesting that DNA repair plays important roles mutation rates in plasmid shuttle vectors in model systems (20, in the HIV-1 life cycle. The divergent interactions of HIV-1 and HIV-2 with DNA repair enzymes and SAMHD1 imply that these Significance viruses use different strategies to guard their genomes and facil- itate their replication in the host. In nondividing host cells, HIV is targeted by intrinsic antiviral HIV | Vpr | postreplication DNA repair | SAMHD1 | restriction defense mechanisms that introduce marks of damage into viral cDNA, thereby tagging it for processing by cellular DNA repair machinery. Surprisingly, our findings reveal that the two main ondividing memory T cells and myeloid cells are the main types of HIV exhibit very different interactions with enzymes Ntargets of primate lentiviruses during the initial weeks of the – involved in DNA repair. HIV-1, but not HIV-2, efficiently removes acute, in vivo infection (1 4). Infection of these cells is inhibited select DNA repair enzymes, whereas HIV-2 increases dNTP supply by intrinsic and innate antiviral mechanisms, several of which con- in infected cells by removing SAMHD1 (a cell cycle-regulated dNTP verge on reverse transcription of the viral RNA genome. One such triphosphohydrolase) dNTPase. Our findings imply that increasing restriction is imposed by SAMHD1, a cell cycle-regulated dNTP dNTP supply during viral cDNA synthesis or repair, or blocking triphosphohydrolase that, in G1-phase leukocytes, maintains the cDNA processing by DNA repair enzymes, are alternative strate- concentrations of canonical dNTPs below the threshold required for gies used by HIV-2 and HIV-1 to guard their DNA genomes and efficient reverse transcription (5–8). Another is caused by a rela- facilitate their replication/persistence in the host. tively high concentration of noncanonical deoxyuridine triphosphate compared with canonical TTP. dUTP is a substrate for HIV reverse Author contributions: K.H., C.H., M.-C.S., S.K., S.K.S., L.F., M.P.W., and J.S. designed re- transcriptase, which leads to uracil incorporation into viral cDNA. search; K.H., C.H., M.-C.S., S.K., and S.K.S. performed research; L.F. and M.P.W. contrib- uted new reagents/analytic tools; K.H., C.H., M.-C.S., S.K., S.K.S., L.F., M.P.W., and J.S. HIV reverse transcripts are heavily uracilated in macrophages analyzed data; and J.S. wrote the paper. (9, 10). Moreover, viral cDNA is a substrate for apolipoprotein B The author declares no conflict of interest. mRNA-editing, enzyme-catalytic, polypeptide-like 3 (APOBEC3)- This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. family editing enzymes, which convert cytidine to uridine in the Data deposition: The complete MudPIT mass spectrometry dataset (raw files, peak files, minus strand of HIV reverse-transcription intermediates (6, 7, 11, search files, as well as DTASelect result files) can be obtained from the MassIVE database 12). The latter two mechanisms flag viral cDNA for processing by via ftp://[email protected] with password KHJS60144. cellular DNA repair enzymes. 1K.H. and C.H. contributed equally to this work. The restriction mechanisms that target lentivirus genome rep- 2To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]. lication are counteracted by accessory virulence proteins Vif, Vpx, This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. and Vpr, which usurp specific cellular E3 ubiquitin ligases to direct 1073/pnas.1605023113/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1605023113 PNAS | Published online June 22, 2016 | E3921–E3930 Downloaded by guest on September 27, 2021 21). Vpr, like Vpx, binds the DCAF1 subunit of the CRL4DCAF1 (41, 42). The presence of multiple proteins involved with DNA E3 complex and hijacks this enzyme (22). This interaction is repair was not surprising, as HIV-1 Vpr and DCAF1 were reported associated with the induction of DNA repair foci and activation to colocalize with DNA repair foci in chromatin (23). The presence of the serine/threonine kinase ATR-controlled DNA damage of UNG2, a known, specific substrate of the CRL4DCAF1-H1.Vpr checkpoint; the latter usually reflects the presence of, or failure E3, in MudPIT datasets indicates that our experimental approach to repair, damaged DNA at replication forks (23–25). Al- detects cellular proteins that Vpr recruits to the CRL4DCAF1 E3 though the exact mechanism by which Vpr mediates the in- ubiquitin ligase and thereby directs for proteasome-dependent duction of replication stress is unclear, it was recently linked degradation. to the Vpr-mediated recruitment of SLX4-SLX1/MUS81-EME1 structure-specific endonucleases to DCAF1, resulting in activation HIV-1 Vpr Down-Regulates HLTF, a Postreplication DNA Repair Helicase. of the MUS81-EME1 endonuclease and, surprisingly, DCAF1- To assess whether any of the 21 identified DNA repair proteins is a and proteasome-dependent MUS81 degradation (26). Sepa- potential substrate of CRL4DCAF1-H1.Vpr E3, we first tested their rately, HIV-1 and HIV-2 Vpr were reported to bind a base levels in CEM.SS-iH1.Vpr and/or U2OS-iH1.Vpr, the latter also excision repair enzyme, uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG2), harboring a doxycycline-inducible HIV-1 NL4-3 Vpr transgene (Fig. which can restrict HIV-1 infection in cells with high concen- S1). Of note, U2OS cells retain many of the cell cycle regulation trations of dUTP (19, 27–29). HIV-1 Vpr was shown to tar- characteristics of normal cells and are commonly used for cell cycle/ get UNG2 to the ubiquitin proteasome pathway via the DNA repair/replication studies. Interestingly, the levels of endoge- CRL4DCAF1 E3 complex and thereby disrupt UNG2-initiated base nous HLTF were much lower in CEM.SS-iH1.Vpr and U2OS-iH1. excision repair in HIV-1–infected cells (30–32). Vpr cells that had been arrested by Vpr at the DNA damage The fact that cellular restriction factors flag HIV cDNA for checkpoint in the G2 phase of the cell cycle compared with control processing by DNA repair enzymes, taken together with the asynchronously dividing cells that did not express Vpr (Fig. S1). considerable complexity of cellular repair machineries, raises the Significantly, HLTF was not depleted in control cells arrested possibility that Vpr coordinately engages DNA repair pathways.
Recommended publications
  • DNA Replication Stress Response Involving PLK1, CDC6, POLQ
    DNA replication stress response involving PLK1, CDC6, POLQ, RAD51 and CLASPIN upregulation prognoses the outcome of early/mid-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients C. Allera-Moreau, I. Rouquette, B. Lepage, N. Oumouhou, M. Walschaerts, E. Leconte, V. Schilling, K. Gordien, L. Brouchet, Mb Delisle, et al. To cite this version: C. Allera-Moreau, I. Rouquette, B. Lepage, N. Oumouhou, M. Walschaerts, et al.. DNA replica- tion stress response involving PLK1, CDC6, POLQ, RAD51 and CLASPIN upregulation prognoses the outcome of early/mid-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients. Oncogenesis, Nature Publishing Group: Open Access Journals - Option C, 2012, 1, pp.e30. 10.1038/oncsis.2012.29. hal-00817701 HAL Id: hal-00817701 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00817701 Submitted on 9 Jun 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License Citation: Oncogenesis (2012) 1, e30; doi:10.1038/oncsis.2012.29 & 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 2157-9024/12 www.nature.com/oncsis ORIGINAL ARTICLE DNA replication stress response involving PLK1, CDC6, POLQ, RAD51 and CLASPIN upregulation prognoses the outcome of early/mid-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients C Allera-Moreau1,2,7, I Rouquette2,7, B Lepage3, N Oumouhou3, M Walschaerts4, E Leconte5, V Schilling1, K Gordien2, L Brouchet2, MB Delisle1,2, J Mazieres1,2, JS Hoffmann1, P Pasero6 and C Cazaux1 Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • UBE2N Antibody (N-Term) Blocking Peptide Synthetic Peptide Catalog # Bp13846a
    10320 Camino Santa Fe, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.875.1900 Fax: 858.622.0609 UBE2N Antibody (N-term) Blocking peptide Synthetic peptide Catalog # BP13846a Specification UBE2N Antibody (N-term) Blocking UBE2N Antibody (N-term) Blocking peptide - peptide - Background Product Information The modification of proteins with ubiquitin is Primary Accession P61088 animportant cellular mechanism for targeting abnormal or short-livedproteins for degradation. Ubiquitination involves at least UBE2N Antibody (N-term) Blocking peptide - Additional Information threeclasses of enzymes: ubiquitin-activating enzymes, or E1s,ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, or E2s, and ubiquitin-proteinligases, Gene ID 7334 or E3s. This gene encodes a member of the E2ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme family. Other Names Studies in mouse suggest thatthis protein plays Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 N, a role in DNA postreplication repair. Bendless-like ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, [providedby RefSeq]. Ubc13, UbcH13, Ubiquitin carrier protein N, Ubiquitin-protein ligase N, UBE2N, BLU UBE2N Antibody (N-term) Blocking Target/Specificity peptide - References The synthetic peptide sequence used to generate the antibody AP13846a was Zhao, J., et al. BMC Med. Genet. 11, 96 (2010) selected from the N-term region of UBE2N. :Markson, G., et al. Genome Res. A 10 to 100 fold molar excess to antibody is 19(10):1905-1911(2009)Topisirovic, I., et al. recommended. Precise conditions should be Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. optimized for a particular assay. 106(31):12676-12681(2009)Yin, Q., et al. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16(6):658-666(2009)van Wijk, Format S.J., et al. Mol. Syst. Biol. 5, 295 (2009) : Peptides are lyophilized in a solid powder format.
    [Show full text]
  • Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-Like Proteins Are Essential Regulators of DNA Damage Bypass
    cancers Review Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-Like Proteins Are Essential Regulators of DNA Damage Bypass Nicole A. Wilkinson y, Katherine S. Mnuskin y, Nicholas W. Ashton * and Roger Woodgate * Laboratory of Genomic Integrity, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 9800 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, USA; [email protected] (N.A.W.); [email protected] (K.S.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (N.W.A.); [email protected] (R.W.); Tel.: +1-301-435-1115 (N.W.A.); +1-301-435-0740 (R.W.) Co-first authors. y Received: 29 August 2020; Accepted: 29 September 2020; Published: 2 October 2020 Simple Summary: Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins are conjugated to many other proteins within the cell, to regulate their stability, localization, and activity. These modifications are essential for normal cellular function and the disruption of these processes contributes to numerous cancer types. In this review, we discuss how ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins regulate the specialized replication pathways of DNA damage bypass, as well as how the disruption of these processes can contribute to cancer development. We also discuss how cancer cell survival relies on DNA damage bypass, and how targeting the regulation of these pathways by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins might be an effective strategy in anti-cancer therapies. Abstract: Many endogenous and exogenous factors can induce genomic instability in human cells, in the form of DNA damage and mutations, that predispose them to cancer development. Normal cells rely on DNA damage bypass pathways such as translesion synthesis (TLS) and template switching (TS) to replicate past lesions that might otherwise result in prolonged replication stress and lethal double-strand breaks (DSBs).
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Characterisation of Human Cytomegalovirus-Mediated Degradation of Helicase-Like Transcription Factor
    Identification and Characterisation of Human Cytomegalovirus-Mediated Degradation of Helicase-Like Transcription Factor Kai-Min Lin Department of Medicine Cambridge Institute for Medical Research University of Cambridge This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Fitzwilliam College September 2020 Declaration I hereby declare, that except where specific reference is made to the work of others, the contents of this dissertation are original and have not been submitted in whole or in part for consideration for any other degree of qualification in this, or any other university. This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as where specified in the text and acknowledgments. This dissertation does not exceed the specified word limit of 60,000 words as defined by the Degree Committee, excluding figures, photographs, tables, appendices and bibliography. Kai-Min Lin September, 2020 I Summary Identification and characterisation of human cytomegalovirus-mediated degradation of helicase-like transcription factor Kai-Min Lin Viruses are known to degrade host factors that are important in innate antiviral immunity in order to infect successfully. To systematically identify host proteins targeted for early degradation by human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), the lab developed orthogonal screens using high resolution multiplexed mass spectrometry. Taking advantage of broad and selective proteasome and lysosome inhibitors, proteasomal degradation was found to be heavily exploited by HCMV. Several known antiviral restriction factors, including components of cellular promyelocytic leukemia (PML) were enriched in a shortlist of proteasomally degraded proteins during infection. A particularly robust novel ‘hit’ was helicase-like transcription factor (HLTF), a DNA repair protein that participates in error-free repair of stalled replication forks.
    [Show full text]
  • Loss of HLTF Function Promotes Intestinal Carcinogenesis Sumit Sandhu1, Xiaoli Wu1, Zinnatun Nabi1, Mojgan Rastegar1,3,4, Sam Kung3, Sabine Mai1,2 and Hao Ding1*
    Sandhu et al. Molecular Cancer 2012, 11:18 http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/11/1/18 RESEARCH Open Access Loss of HLTF function promotes intestinal carcinogenesis Sumit Sandhu1, Xiaoli Wu1, Zinnatun Nabi1, Mojgan Rastegar1,3,4, Sam Kung3, Sabine Mai1,2 and Hao Ding1* Abstract Background: HLTF (Helicase-like Transcription Factor) is a DNA helicase protein homologous to the SWI/SNF family involved in the maintenance of genomic stability and the regulation of gene expression. HLTF has also been found to be frequently inactivated by promoter hypermethylation in human colon cancers. Whether this epigenetic event is required for intestinal carcinogenesis is unknown. Results: To address the role of loss of HLTF function in the development of intestinal cancer, we generated Hltf deficient mice. These mutant mice showed normal development, and did not develop intestinal tumors, indicating that loss of Hltf function by itself is insufficient to induce the formation of intestinal cancer. On the Apcmin/+ mutant background, Hltf- deficiency was found to significantly increase the formation of intestinal adenocarcinoma and colon cancers. Cytogenetic analysis of colon tumor cells from Hltf -/-/Apcmin/+ mice revealed a high incidence of gross chromosomal instabilities, including Robertsonian fusions, chromosomal fragments and aneuploidy. None of these genetic alterations were observed in the colon tumor cells derived from Apcmin/+ mice. Increased tumor growth and genomic instability was also demonstrated in HCT116 human colon cancer cells in which HLTF expression was significantly decreased. Conclusion: Taken together, our results demonstrate that loss of HLTF function promotes the malignant transformation of intestinal or colonic adenomas to carcinomas by inducing genomic instability.
    [Show full text]
  • Lymph Node Metastasis Is Infrequent in Patients with Highly-Methylated Colorectal Cancer
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH 26: 55-58 (2006) Lymph Node Metastasis is Infrequent in Patients with Highly-methylated Colorectal Cancer KENJI HIBI1 and AKIMASA NAKAO2 1Department of Surgery, Seirei Hospital, 56 Kawanayama-machi, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8633; 2Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8560, Japan Abstract. In this study, the combined methylation status of p16, was found to harbor promoter hypermethylation p16, p14, HLTF, CDH13 and RUNX3 was examined in 59 associated with the loss of protein expression in cancer cells resected primary colorectal cancers using methylation-specific (7). Though homozygous deletions of the p16 locus were not PCR and the methylation status was correlated with the present (8), p16 promoter methylation was detected in clinicopathological features of the affected patients. A colorectal cancer (9). Subsequently, it has been found that significant difference was found in lymph node metastasis human p14 was also silenced by promoter hypermethylation (p=0.0359) on comparing the methylation status in in colorectal cancer (10). p14 interacts with the MDM2 colorectal cancers with lymph node metastasis to those protein and neutralizes the MDM2-mediated degradation without. There was also a significant gender difference of p53. Thus, p14 acts as a tumor suppressor gene via (p=0.0248) when the methylation status was compared. inhibition of p53 degradation. These studies indicated that Colorectal cancer without lymph node metastasis frequently p16 and p14 inactivation due to promoter methylation was exhibited aberrant methylation of the p16, p14, HLTF, important for colorectal tumorigenesis. We previously CDH13 and RUNX3 genes. examined the methylation status of these genes in 86 primary colorectal cancers using methylation-specific PCR There is now strong evidence that a series of genetic (MSP) (11).
    [Show full text]
  • Nº Ref Uniprot Proteína Péptidos Identificados Por MS/MS 1 P01024
    Document downloaded from http://www.elsevier.es, day 26/09/2021. This copy is for personal use. Any transmission of this document by any media or format is strictly prohibited. Nº Ref Uniprot Proteína Péptidos identificados 1 P01024 CO3_HUMAN Complement C3 OS=Homo sapiens GN=C3 PE=1 SV=2 por 162MS/MS 2 P02751 FINC_HUMAN Fibronectin OS=Homo sapiens GN=FN1 PE=1 SV=4 131 3 P01023 A2MG_HUMAN Alpha-2-macroglobulin OS=Homo sapiens GN=A2M PE=1 SV=3 128 4 P0C0L4 CO4A_HUMAN Complement C4-A OS=Homo sapiens GN=C4A PE=1 SV=1 95 5 P04275 VWF_HUMAN von Willebrand factor OS=Homo sapiens GN=VWF PE=1 SV=4 81 6 P02675 FIBB_HUMAN Fibrinogen beta chain OS=Homo sapiens GN=FGB PE=1 SV=2 78 7 P01031 CO5_HUMAN Complement C5 OS=Homo sapiens GN=C5 PE=1 SV=4 66 8 P02768 ALBU_HUMAN Serum albumin OS=Homo sapiens GN=ALB PE=1 SV=2 66 9 P00450 CERU_HUMAN Ceruloplasmin OS=Homo sapiens GN=CP PE=1 SV=1 64 10 P02671 FIBA_HUMAN Fibrinogen alpha chain OS=Homo sapiens GN=FGA PE=1 SV=2 58 11 P08603 CFAH_HUMAN Complement factor H OS=Homo sapiens GN=CFH PE=1 SV=4 56 12 P02787 TRFE_HUMAN Serotransferrin OS=Homo sapiens GN=TF PE=1 SV=3 54 13 P00747 PLMN_HUMAN Plasminogen OS=Homo sapiens GN=PLG PE=1 SV=2 48 14 P02679 FIBG_HUMAN Fibrinogen gamma chain OS=Homo sapiens GN=FGG PE=1 SV=3 47 15 P01871 IGHM_HUMAN Ig mu chain C region OS=Homo sapiens GN=IGHM PE=1 SV=3 41 16 P04003 C4BPA_HUMAN C4b-binding protein alpha chain OS=Homo sapiens GN=C4BPA PE=1 SV=2 37 17 Q9Y6R7 FCGBP_HUMAN IgGFc-binding protein OS=Homo sapiens GN=FCGBP PE=1 SV=3 30 18 O43866 CD5L_HUMAN CD5 antigen-like OS=Homo
    [Show full text]
  • Fission Yeast Rad8/HLTF Facilitates Rad52-Dependent Chromosomal
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.05.425428; this version posted January 6, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Fission yeast Rad8/HLTF facilitates Rad52-dependent 2 chromosomal rearrangements through PCNA lysine 107 3 ubiquitination 4 5 Jie Su, Naoko Toyofuku, Takuro Nakagawa * 6 Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Japan 7 *For correspondence: [email protected] 8 9 10 Abstract 11 Rad52 recombinase can cause gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs). However, the 12 mechanism of Rad52-dependent GCRs remains unclear. Here, we show that fission yeast 13 Rad8/HLTF facilitates Rad52-dependent GCRs through the ubiquitination of lysine 107 (K107) 14 of PCNA, a DNA sliding clamp. Loss of Rad8 reduced isochromosomes resulting from 15 centromere inverted repeat recombination. Rad8 HIRAN and RING finger mutations reduced 16 GCRs, suggesting that Rad8 facilitates GCRs through 3' DNA-end binding and ubiquitin ligase 17 activity. Mms2 and Ubc4 but not Ubc13 ubiquitin-conjugating proteins were required for GCRs. 18 Consistent with this, PCNA K107R but not K164R mutation greatly reduced GCRs. Rad8- 19 dependent PCNA K107 ubiquitination facilitates Rad52-dependent GCRs, as PCNA K107R, 20 rad8, and rad52 mutations epistatically reduced GCRs. Remarkably, K107 is located at the 21 interface between PCNA subunits, and an interface mutation D150E bypassed the requirement 22 of PCNA K107 ubiquitination for GCRs.
    [Show full text]
  • Autism and Cancer Share Risk Genes, Pathways, and Drug Targets
    TIGS 1255 No. of Pages 8 Forum Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of unclear whether this is related to its signal- Autism and Cancer risk genes for ASD that are also risk genes ing function or a consequence of a second for cancers, extending the original finding independent PTEN activity, but this dual Share Risk Genes, that the PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling axis function may provide the rationale for the (involving PTEN, FMR1, NF1, TSC1, and dominant role of PTEN in cancer and Pathways, and Drug TSC2) was associated with inherited risk autism. Other genes encoding common Targets for both cancer and ASD [6–9]. Recent tumor signaling pathways include MET8[1_TD$IF],[2_TD$IF] genome-wide exome-sequencing studies PTK7, and HRAS, while p53, AKT, mTOR, Jacqueline N. Crawley,1,2,* of de novo variants in ASD and cancer WNT, NOTCH, and MAPK are compo- Wolf-Dietrich Heyer,3,4 and have begun to uncover considerable addi- nents of signaling pathways regulating Janine M. LaSalle1,4,5 tional overlap. What is surprising about the the nuclear factors described above. genes in Table 1 is not necessarily the Autism is a neurodevelopmental number of risk genes found in both autism Autism is comorbid with several mono- and cancer, but the shared functions of genic neurodevelopmental disorders, disorder, diagnosed behaviorally genes in chromatin remodeling and including Fragile X (FMR1), Rett syndrome by social and communication genome maintenance, transcription fac- (MECP2), Phelan-McDermid (SHANK3), fi de cits, repetitive behaviors, tors, and signal transduction pathways 15q duplication syndrome (UBE3A), and restricted interests. Recent leading to nuclear changes [7,8].
    [Show full text]
  • Rad5, HLTF, and SHPRH: a Fresh View of an Old Story
    This is a repository copy of Rad5, HLTF, and SHPRH: A fresh view of an old story. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/159493/ Version: Published Version Article: Elserafy, M., Abugable, A.A. orcid.org/0000-0003-1275-3328, Atteya, R. et al. (1 more author) (2018) Rad5, HLTF, and SHPRH: A fresh view of an old story. Trends in Genetics, 34 (8). pp. 574-577. ISSN 0168-9525 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2018.04.006 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ impact of mismatches on the recombina- The presence of dispersed Alu elements chromosomal double strand breaks. Methods Mol. Biol. 920, 379–391 fi tion ef ciency. Their reporter was inte- throughout the genome [3], and other 9. Sugawara, N. et al. (2004) Heteroduplex rejection during grated in the genome in such a way that repetitive DNA sequences, provides end- single-strand annealing requires Sgs1 helicase and mis- match repair proteins Msh2 and Msh6 but not Pms1.
    [Show full text]
  • UBE2N Antibody Order 021-34695924 [email protected] Support 400-6123-828 50Ul [email protected] 100 Ul √ √ Web
    TD8193 UBE2N Antibody Order 021-34695924 [email protected] Support 400-6123-828 50ul [email protected] 100 uL √ √ Web www.ab-mart.com.cn Description: The UBE2V1-UBE2N and UBE2V2-UBE2N heterodimers catalyze the synthesis of non- canonical 'Lys-63'-linked polyubiquitin chains. This type of polyubiquitination does not lead to protein degradation by the proteasome. Mediates transcriptional activation of target genes. Plays a role in the control of progress through the cell cycle and differentiation. Plays a role in the error-free DNA repair pathway and contributes to the survival of cells after DNA damage. Acts together with the E3 ligases, HLTF and SHPRH, in the 'Lys-63'- linked poly-ubiquitination of PCNA upon genotoxic stress, which is required for DNA repair. Appears to act together with E3 ligase RNF5 in the 'Lys-63'-linked polyubiquitination of JKAMP thereby regulating JKAMP function by decreasing its association with components of the proteasome and ERAD. Promotes TRIM5 capsid-specific restriction activity and the UBE2V1-UBE2N heterodimer acts in concert with TRIM5 to generate 'Lys-63'-linked polyubiquitin chains which activate the MAP3K7/TAK1 complex which in turn results in the induction and expression of NF-kappa-B and MAPK-responsive inflammatory genes. Together with RNF135 and UB2V1, catalyzes the viral RNA-dependent 'Lys-63'-linked polyubiquitination of RIG-I/DDX58 to activate the downstream signaling pathway that leads to interferon beta production. Uniprot:P61088 Alternative Names: Bendless like ubiquitin conjugating enzyme;
    [Show full text]
  • Highly-Methylated Colorectal Cancers Show Poorly-Differentiated Phenotype
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH 26: 4263-4266 (2006) Highly-methylated Colorectal Cancers Show Poorly-differentiated Phenotype KENJI HIBI1,2 and AKIMASA NAKAO2 1Department of Surgery, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, 1-30 Fujigaoka, Aoba-ku, Yokohama 227-8501; 2Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8560, Japan Abstract. The combined methylation status of p16, p14, HLTF, human p14 was also silenced by promoter hypermethylation SOCS-1, CDH13, RUNX3 and CHFR was examined in 58 in colorectal cancer (10). p14 interacts with the MDM2 resected primary colorectal cancers using methylation-specific protein and neutralizes the MDM2-mediated degradation of PCR, and the methylation status was correlated with the p53. Thus, p14 acts as a tumor suppressor gene via inhibition clinicopathological features of the affected patients. A significant of p53 degradation. These studies indicated that p16 and p14 difference in histology (p=0.0041) was observed when the number inactivation due to promoter methylation was important for of methylated genes of poorly-differentiated colorectal cancers was colorectal tumorigenesis. We previously examined the compared to that of other differentiated ones. Poorly-differentiated methylation status of these genes in 86 primary colorectal colorectal cancers preferentially exhibited gene methylation. cancers using methylation-specific PCR (MSP) (11). Aberrant promoter methylation of p16 and p14 genes was detected in There is now strong evidence that a series of genetic 43 out of 86 (50 %) and 25 out of 86 (29%) colorectal cancer alterations in both dominant oncogenes and tumor suppressor specimens, respectively. genes are involved in the pathogenesis of human colorectal The loss of expression of a helicase-like transcription factor cancer.
    [Show full text]