NEWS IN FOCUS PHYSICS Entanglement can’t NORTHERN LIGHT Fourth- ETHICS Panel considers CHEMISTRY The building boom be explained by local generation synchrotron data-sharing issues in nanoscale motors, rotors, effects p.14 powers up in Sweden p.15 in big US study p.16 switches and pumps p.18 NASA/JHUAPL/SWRI

The craft photographed ’s atmosphere, backlit by the Sun, as the probe sailed away from the dwarf planet in mid-July.

PLANETARY SCIENCE Pluto pressure data pose an atmospheric conundrum Discrepancy arises between New Horizons and Earth-based measurements.

BY ALEXANDRA WITZE measurements obtained from Earth. (SwRI) in Boulder, Colorado. Some have suggested that Pluto’s atmos- On 29 June, a few weeks before the ASA’s New Horizons spacecraft solved pheric pressure is dropping as the dwarf fly-by, Young organized astronomers across many mysteries about Pluto when it planet’s orbit carries it farther from the Sun and New Zealand and Australia to watch Pluto flew past the dwarf planet in July. But gases freeze out and fall to the surface as snow. as it passed in front of a distant star. Tracking Nas mission controllers prepare to steer the But the most recent data taken from Earth how the star’s light faded during the passage probe to its next rendezvous, planetary sci- suggest no such dramatic transformation. provided information on how much gas is in entists are working to understand a puzzling “I feel pretty secure that Pluto isn’t starting Pluto’s atmosphere. Using the same method, result: an atmospheric pressure at Pluto’s to freeze out,” says Eliot Young, a planetary planetary scientists have seen the atmosphere surface that is much lower than indicated by scientist at the Southwest Research Institute grow denser since 1988 — and analysis of

3 SEPTEMBER 2015 | VOL 525 | NATURE | 13 © 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved NEWS IN FOCUS

the 29 June observations shows that the QUANTUM PHYSICS trend remains intact. Young calculates that the current atmospheric pressure at Pluto’s surface is 22 microbars (0.022 pascals), or 22-millionths the pressure at sea level on Toughest test yet for Earth. But on 14 July, New Horizons measured Pluto’s surface pressure as much lower quantum ‘spookiness’ than that ­— just 5 microbars. “How we link the two, we’re still working on,” says Cathy Olkin, a deputy project scientist for Experiment plugs loopholes in previous demonstrations of New Horizons at SwRI. ‘action at a distance’ and could make data encryption safer. Part of the discrepancy between the spacecraft’s observation and past estimates could be due to the indirect way that BY ZEEYA MERALI of light. He proposed that quantum particles astronomers derive the value from Earth- do have set properties, called hidden vari- based observations. These studies measure t’s a bad day both for Albert Einstein and for ables, before they are measured, and that even pressure some 50–75 kilo­metres above the hackers. Physicists say that they have made though those variables cannot be accessed they dwarf planet’s surface, and researchers use the most rigorous demonstration yet of the pre-program entangled particles to behave in assumptions about the atmosphere’s struc- Iquantum ‘spooky action at a distance’ effect correlated ways. ture to calculate what that number translates that the German physicist famously hated — in In the 1960s, physicist John Bell proposed a to at the ground. which manipulating one object instantaneously test that could discriminate between Einstein’s By contrast, New Horizons measured seems to affect another one far away. hidden variables and spooky action at a surface pressure directly by determin- The experiment could be the final nail in distance1. He calculated that hidden variables ing how strongly radio waves, beamed the coffin for theories that are more intuitive can explain correlations only up to some maxi- from antennas on than standard quantum mechanics. It could mum limit. If that level is exceeded, then Ein- Earth, bent as they “We may be also enable engineers to develop a new suite stein’s model must be wrong. passed through looking at the of ultrasecure cryptographic devices. “From a The first experiment suggesting that this was Pluto’s atmos- first test of these fundamental point of view, this is truly history- the case was carried out in 1981 (ref. 2). Many phere and arrived models, not an making,” says Nicolas Gisin, a quantum physi- more have been performed since, always com- at the spacecraft cist at the University of Geneva in Switzerland. ing down on the side of spookiness — but each on the far side of atmospheric In quantum mechanics, objects can be in has had loopholes that meant that physicists the dwarf planet. collapse.” multiple states simultaneously: an atom can be have never been able to fully close the door on The next chal- in two places at once, for example. Measuring Einstein’s view. Experiments that use entangled lenge is to figure out which of several an object forces it to snap into a well-defined photons are prone to the ‘detection loophole’: competing models that describe Pluto’s state. The properties of different objects also not all photons produced in the experiment are atmosphere can best reconcile the Earth- can become ‘entangled’, meaning that when detected, and sometimes as many as 80% are based measurements and what New one such object is measured, the state of its lost. Experimenters therefore have to assume Horizons measured at the surface. entangled twin also becomes set. that the photons they capture are representa- “We may be looking at the first test of This idea galled Einstein because it seemed tive of the entire set. these models, not an atmospheric collapse that this ghostly influence would travel instan- To get around the detection loophole, physi- or some spectacularly freaky physics,” taneously — contravening the universal rule cists often use particles that are easier to keep says Ivan Linscott, a physicist at Stanford that nothing can travel faster than the speed track of than are photons, such as atoms. But University in California and co-leader of it is tough to place atoms far apart without the New Horizons radio measurement. destroying their entanglement. This opens “The jury’s still out.” the ‘communication loophole’: if the entangled Clues may yet come from New Horizons. atoms are too close together, then, in princi- About 95% of the data collected in its Pluto ple, measurements made on one could affect fly-by, including much of the informa- the other without violating the speed-of-light tion from the radio measurement, is still limit. on board. Slow transmission speeds mean that the team will have to wait months for ENTANGLEMENT SWAPPING the rest of it to arrive. The transmission In the latest paper3, which was submitted to of images, which has been on pause since the arXiv preprint repository on 24 August soon after the 14 July fly-by, will resume on and has not yet been peer reviewed, Ronald 5 September. Hanson of Delft University of Technology And in late October, mission controllers and his colleagues report the first Bell experi- will ignite the spacecraft’s engines in a ment that closes both the detection and the series of burns to set it on course for its next communication loopholes. The team used destination: an object called 2014 MU69, a cunning technique called entanglement which is about 45 kilometres across and swapping to combine the benefits of using lies in the , a collection of both light and matter. The researchers started small bodies orbiting beyond . with two unentangled electrons sitting in dia- New Horizons is set to pass within about mond crystals in different labs on the Delft 12,000 kilometres of the object on New John Bell devised a test to show that nature does campus, 1.3 kilometres apart. Each electron

Year’s Day 2019. ■ not ‘hide variables’ as Einstein had proposed. was individually entangled with a photon, CERN

14 | NATURE | VOL 525 | 3 SEPTEMBER 2015 © 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved