DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment Remediating Native Fish Spawning Habitat in the St. Clair

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment Remediating Native Fish Spawning Habitat in the St. Clair Environmental Assessment Remediating Native Fish Spawning Habitat in the St. Clair – Detroit River System Detroit River and St. Clair River, Michigan June 2014 Prepared by: United States Geological Survey Great Lakes Science Center 1451 Green Road Ann Arbor, MI 48105 In Cooperation with University of Michigan Michigan Sea Grant SmithGroupJJR __________________________ ______________________________ Date Approved for U.S. Geologic Survey Leon Carl, Midwest Regional Director For additional information concerning this proposed project or document, please contact: Jennifer Read, Ph.D. Bruce Manny, Ph.D. Deputy Director Research Fishery Biologist University of Michigan Water Center USGS Great Lakes Science Center 214 S. State St., Suite 200 1451 Green Road Ann Arbor, MI 48104 Ann Arbor, MI 48105 Phone: 734.763.2642 Phone: 734.214.7255 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] http://graham.umich.edu/water http://www.glsc.usgs.gov/ PREFACE The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 requires that federal government agencies identify and consider the social, economic, and natural environmental impacts of proposed actions as part of their decision-making processes. NEPA also requires that agencies receiving federal aid for a project provide information to the public and consider their input when reaching decisions. This Environmental Assessment (EA) has been prepared to satisfy these requirements. Proposed federal actions are classified into three different categories under NEPA. Class I actions “significantly” affect the environment and require preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Class II actions, deemed “categorical exclusions” do not have a significant effect on the environment, and do not require an EA or an EIS. Class III actions are those for which the significance of impacts is not clear. These actions require preparation of an EA to determine if an EIS or Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is the appropriate type of documentation. This EA has been prepared for the Remediation of Native Fish Spawning Habitat in the Detroit – St. Clair River System, Michigan. It includes several sections that address the following topics: • The purpose and need for the project. • Alternatives that were considered when designing and locating the proposed actions. • Existing environmental conditions in the project area. • Likely impacts and benefits of the proposed actions. • Consultation and coordination that has taken place with the public and government agencies. The worked described in this EA is part of a larger overall effort to remediate the St. Clair and Detroit rivers. Both rivers were identified as Areas of Concern (AOCs) under the U.S.-Canada Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (Annex 2 of the 1987 Protocol and the 2012 Amendment) because they experienced severe environmental degradation resulting in a number of formally designated Beneficial Use Impairments (BUIs). The proposed habitat remediation work is an important part of the restoration and delisting process for two Beneficial Use Impairments: 1) Loss of fish and wildlife habitat (BUI 14); and 2) Degradation of fish and wildlife populations (BUI 3). For this reason, the project team has already received funding for the St. Clair River projects from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through the Federal Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. Environmental Assessment June 2014 Remediating Native Fish Spawning Habitat in the St. Clair – Detroit River System Page i 50350.001 REMEDIATING NATIVE FISH SPAWNING HABITAT IN THE ST. CLAIR – DETROIT RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................... 1 SECTION 1 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE AND NEED ............................................................................ 2 1.1 Project Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Target Fish Species ............................................................................................................ 2 1.2.2 Historic Impacts to Fish Habitat .......................................................................................... 3 1.2.3 Remediation of Areas of Concern ....................................................................................... 6 1.2.4 Research Strategies and Consensus-Based Approach ..................................................... 6 1.2.5 Scoping and Issues ............................................................................................................. 8 1.3 Decision to be Made ........................................................................................................................ 8 1.4 Legal Mandates ................................................................................................................................ 8 SECTION 2 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED .......................................................................................... 9 2.1 Basis for Alternatives Considered .................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Alternatives Considered and Dismissed ........................................................................................ 11 2.2.1 Site Selection .................................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Preferred Alternative ...................................................................................................................... 12 2.3.1 St. Clair River Projects ...................................................................................................... 13 2.3.2 Detroit River Projects ........................................................................................................ 15 2.3.3 Project Monitoring ............................................................................................................. 17 2.4 No Action Alternative ...................................................................................................................... 17 SECTION 3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ............................................................................................ 19 3.1 Topography and Soils .................................................................................................................... 19 3.2 Utility Impacts ................................................................................................................................. 19 3.3 Social Impacts ................................................................................................................................ 19 3.3.1 Harts Light Reef (St. Clair River) ...................................................................................... 20 3.3.2 Pointe Aux Chenes Reef (St. Clair River) ......................................................................... 21 3.3.3 Detroit River Reef Sites .................................................................................................... 22 3.3.4 Impacts for Communities .................................................................................................. 23 3.4 Air Quality ....................................................................................................................................... 24 3.4.1 Attainment Status .............................................................................................................. 24 3.4.2 Regulatory Setting............................................................................................................. 24 3.4.3 Impacts to Air Quality ........................................................................................................ 25 3.5 Noise .............................................................................................................................................. 25 3.6 Summary of Water Resources ....................................................................................................... 26 3.6.1 Water Quality .................................................................................................................... 26 3.6.2 Surface Hydrology............................................................................................................. 27 3.7 Federal Threatened and Endangered Species .............................................................................. 28 Environmental Assessment June 2014 Remediating Native Fish Spawning Habitat in the St. Clair – Detroit River System Page i 50350.001 3.8 State Threatened and Endangered Species .................................................................................. 29 3.9 Invasive Species ............................................................................................................................ 33 3.9.1 Round Goby ...................................................................................................................... 33 3.9.2 Sea Lamprey ..................................................................................................................... 33 3.9.3 Invasive Mussels ............................................................................................................... 34 3.10 Section 4(f)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anthony Wayne M Em 0 R· I a L
    \ I ·I ANTHONY WAYNE M EM 0 R· I A L 'I ' \ THE ANTHONY WAYNE MEMORIAL PARKWAY PROJECT . in OHIO -1 ,,,, J Compiled al tlze Request of the ANTHONY WAYNE MEMO RIAL LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE by lhr O..H. IO STATE ARCHAEOLOGICAL and H ISTORICAL SOCIETY 0 00 60 4016655 2 I• Columbus, Ohio 1944 ' '.'-'TnN ~nd MONTGOMERY COt Jt-rt"-' =J1UC llBR.APV Acknowledgments . .. THE FOLLOWING ORGANIZATIONS ass isted lll the compilation of this booklet : The A nthony Wayne Memo ri al J oint L egislative Cammi ttee The Anthony \Vayne Memori al Associati on The! Toledo-Lucas County Planning Commiss ions The Ohio D epa1 rtment of Conservation and Natural Resources The Ohio Department of Highways \ [ 4 J \ Table of Contents I Anthony Wayne Portrait 1794_ ·---···-· ·--· _____ . ----------- ·----------------- -------------------. _____ Cover Anthony Wayne Portrait in the American Revolution ____________________________ F rrm I ispiece Ii I I The Joint Legislative Committee_______ --------····----------------------------------------------------- 7 i· '#" j The Artthony Wayne Memorial Association ___________________________________ .-------------------- 9 I· The Ohio Anthony Wayne Memorial Committee _____________________________________ ---------- 11 I I I Meetings of the Joint Legislative Committee·------·--------- -·---------------------------------- 13 I I "Mad Anthony" Wayne a'dd the Indian \Vars, 1790-179.'---------------------------------- 15 lI The Military Routes of Wa.yne, St. Clair, and Harmar, 1790-179-t- ___________ . _______ 27 I The Anthony Wayne Memorial
    [Show full text]
  • Detroit Heritage River Nomination Report
    Nomination of the Detroit River Submission Requirements This document sets out the criteria of the Canadian Heritage Rivers Board (CHRS) for the nomination of the Detroit River as a Heritage River within the Canadian Heritage Rivers System (CHRS). The CHRS is the vehicle by which the nominating agency identifies the heritage significance of a river and justifies its inclusion in the CHRS. The purpose of this format is to act as a guide to nominating agencies and to provide consistency in the nomination process. CHRS provides an opportunity for the recognition and conservation of rivers deemed to be of outstanding Canadian heritage value. This value is obtained when it has been determined that a river is an outstanding representative of or unique in a province or territory. By the inclusion of such rivers in a single coast-to-coast system, they become representative of Canada’s river heritage as a whole, thus reflecting a “Canadian value”. 1 Nomination of the Detroit River Canadian Heritage Rivers System The Canadian Heritage Rivers System (CHRS) has been established by the federal, provincial and territorial governments to recognize outstanding rivers of Canada and ensuring management which will protect these rivers and enhance their significant heritage values for the long term benefit and enjoyment of Canadians. To qualify for the Canadian Heritage Rivers System, a river or section of a river must be of outstanding significance in one or more areas: natural heritage, human heritage, or recreational values. The nominated section should be large enough to encompass these values and provide the user with an appreciation of the river’s resources, as well as an enjoyable recreational experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Detroit River International Crossing
    A LOCAL RESPONSE TO THE DETROIT RIVER INTERNATIONAL CROSSING RECOMMENDATIONS TO GUIDE A COMMUNITY BENEFITS AGREEMENT PRODUCED BY THE Urban and Regional Planning Program University of Michigan AT THE REQUEST OF THE Delray Community Council SPRING 2007 The University of Michigan Urban and Regional Planning Program http://www.tcaup.umich.edu/urp/index.html Gary Brieschke Anny Chang Luke Forrest Cassia Heron Kelsey Johnson Rebecca Mark Mariana Orloff Joe Shultz Logan Winston Advisors Eric Dueweke Larissa Larsen EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SUMMARY EXECUTIVE The proposed Detroit River International Crossing (DRIC) has the potential to once again inflict a dispropor- tionate burden on the southwest neighborhood of Delray. Until this point, the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) and its consultant, The Corrodino Group, have maintained a transparent and admi- rable planning process in regards to the proposed crossing. Despite the process, it is our recommendation that the Delray Community Council (DCC) not only partake in the planning process sanctioned by MDOT and the Corrodino Group, but also attempt to create a Community Benefits Agreement (CBA), a signed contract be- tween MDOT and a coalition of neighborhood groups that outlines how Delray and other residents of South- west Detroit can be fairly compensated for the loss of community and quality of life that would invariably oc- cur should the bridge go through Delray. The following report provides the DCC with relevant information pursuant to a CBA. More specifically, the report provides recommendations as to how the DCC should pro- ceed in terms of securing a CBA, and what they should expect to receive from said agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Susan Goethel Campbell Selected Solo Exhibitions 2015 Detroit Weather: 365 Days, the Detroit Instit
    Susan Goethel Campbell www.susangoethelcampbell.com ! ! !Selected Solo Exhibitions 2015 Detroit Weather: 365 Days, The Detroit Institute of Arts, Detroit, MI Field Guide, Oakland University Art Gallery, Rochester, MI 2014 Portraits of Air: Pittsburgh, 709 Gallery, Pittsburgh, PA Resisting Certainty, Grand Rapids Art Museum, Grand Rapids, MI 2013 Rotations, Re:View Contemporary, Detroit, MI 2011 Field Work, Lemberg Gallery, Ferndale, MI 2010 Susan Goethel Campbell, Academy of Merksem, Antwerp, Belgium 2007 Book Not/Book, Lemberg Gallery, Ferndale, MI 2006 Unknown Distance, Kathryn Markel Fine Arts, New York, NY 2002 New Work, Lemberg Gallery, Ferndale, MI 2001 Drawings and Books, Lemberg Gallery, Birmingham, MI After the Deluge, Mott Community College Fine Arts Gallery, Flint, MI 1999 Recent Drawings, Oasis Gallery, Marquette, MI 1997 New Work, Network, Pontiac, MI 1995 Old Bones and Coal, Bunting Gallery, Royal Oak, MI ! Passive Flyers, Birmingham Bloomfield Art Association, Birmingham, MI !Selected Two Person and Group Exhibitions 2015 Permanence/Impermanence, University of North Texas Art Gallery, Denton, TX First Show, David Klein, Detroit, MI Art Position, Fribourg, Switzerland Read Image See Text, Cranbrook Art Museum, Bloomfield Hills, MI 25th Anniversary Exhibition, Galerie Tim Blaess, Bern, Switzerland Art Miami, David Klein Gallery, Miami, FL 2014 State of the Art: Discovering New American Art Now, Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art, Bentonville, AR Two – Person exhibition, Gallery Tom Blaess, Bern, Switzerland I Just Want
    [Show full text]
  • Your Guide to Indiana History
    What’s A Hoosier? Your Guide to Indiana History Distributed by: State Rep. Sally Siegrist [email protected] www.IndianaHouseRepublicans.com 1-800-382-9841 Table of Contents 3 Indiana Facts 4 Native American Heritage 5 Early Hoosiers and Statehood 7 Agriculture and the Hoosier Economy 8 Hoosier Contributions 9 Famous Hoosiers 10 History Scramble 11 Indiana History Quiz 12 Indiana History Quiz Continued 13 Answers to Quizzes Information for this booklet made possible from: www.indianahistory.org, IN.gov and Indiana: The World Around Us MacMillian/McGraw - Hill, 1991 Indiana Facts STATE FLAG STATE SEAL POPULATION The star above the torch The State Seal depicts a Indiana is the 15th stands for Indiana, which pioneer scene portraying largest state. According was the 19th state to how the early people of to the 2010 U.S. join the Union. The state Indiana overcame the Census, 6,483,802 colors are blue and gold. wilderness. The seal has Hoosiers live here. been in use since 1801, adopted until 1963. but it was not officially STATE BIRD STATE CAPITAL STATE FLOWER In 1933, the The capital of Indiana From 1931 to 1957, cardinal was is Indianapolis. The the zinnia was the selected as the state Statehouse is located bird by the Indiana in Indianapolis. In 1957, the Indiana General Assembly. stateGeneral flower Assembly of Indiana. Indiana capital from adopted the peony as Corydon1813 wasto 1825. the first the state flower. 3 Our Native American Heritage Indiana means “the land of the Indians.” Early Native Americans lived like nomads. A nomad is a person who moves from place to place in search of food.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indians and the Michigan Road
    The Indians and the Michigan Road Juanita Hunter* The United States Confederation Congress adopted on May 20, 1785, an ordinance that established the method by which the fed- eral government would transfer its vast, newly acquired national domain to private ownership. According to the Land Ordinance of 1785 the first step in this transferral process was purchase by the government of all Indian claims. In the state of Indiana by 1821 a series of treaties had cleared Indian title from most land south of the Wabash River. Territory north of the river remained in the hands of the Miami and Potawatomi tribes, who retained posses- sion of at least portions of the area until their removals from the state during the late 1830s and early 1840s.’ After a brief hiatus following 1821, attempts to secure addi- tional cessions of land from the Indians in Indiana resumed in 1826. In the fall of that year three commissioners of the United States government-General John Tipton, Indian agent at Fort Wayne; Lewis Cass, governor of Michigan Territory; and James Brown Ray, governor of Indiana-met with leading chiefs and warriors of the Potawatomi and Miami tribes authorized in part “to propose an exchange of land. acre for acre West, of the Mississippi . .’’z The final treaty, signed October 26, 1826, contained no provision for complete Indian removal from the state. The Potawatomis agreed, however, to three important land cessions and received cer- tain benefits that included payment of debts and claims held against * Juanita Hunter is a graduate of Indiana State Teachers College, Terre Haute, and was a social studies teacher at Logansport High School, Logansport, Indiana, at the time of her retirement.
    [Show full text]
  • Detroit's New Front Porch
    Detroit'sDetroit'sDetroit's NewNewNew FrontFrontFront PorchPorchPorch A riverfront greenway in southwest Detroit The Southwest Detroit Riverfront Greenway Project September 1999 Detroit’s New Front Porch A riverfront greenway in southwest Detroit Written by Norman Cox, The Greenway Collaborative, Inc. for Rails-to-Trails Conservancy September 1999 Detroit’s New Front Porch A riverfront greenway in southwest Detroit Table of Contents Summary .....................................................................................................................1 Examples and Inspiration...........................................................................................2 Project Partners .........................................................................................................4 Public Input Related Efforts Issues and Opportunities ...........................................................................................6 History Neighborhoods Redevelopment Initiatives Planned Projects and Development Studies Summary of Issues and Opportunities .....................................................................10 The Problem The Concept Options......................................................................................................................12 Alternative A – Boulevards and Destinations Alternative B – Urban Explorer Master Plan...............................................................................................................15 Fort Wayne Area Working Waterfront Area Riverside Park Area
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Historic Fort Wayne Master Plan (See 3.2: Review of Prior Plans)
    CITY OF DETROIT GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Project Team Brad Dick Group Executive Meagan Elliott, PhD Chief Parks Planner Timothy Boscarino, AICP Project Director Juliana Fulton Parks Planner Historic Fort Way e A!"isory Co# ci$ Scott Bentley National Park Service Julio Cedano City of Detroit Planning and Development Department Jeremy Dimick Detroit Historical Society Martha MacFarlane-Faes Michigan State Historic Preservation Office Andre Kropacek Historic Fort Wayne Coalition Grand Chief Ted Roll Wyandot of Anderdon Nation Steven S. Rose United States Army Corps of Engineers Eva Torres City of Detroit Department of Neighborhoods Theresa Zajac Southwest Detroit Business Association Heather Zygmontowicz City of Detroit Bridging Neighborhoods TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SECTION ONE: BACKGROUND 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Profound and Diverse History and Significance 1.3 Future Opportunities SECTION TWO: LEGAL MANDATES 2.1 Historic Surplus Property Program and Federal Lands to Par!s Program 2.2 State and Local Re#uirements SECTION THREE: PLANNING PROCESS 3.1 Overvie$ 3.2 Revie$ of Prior Plans 3.3 Stakeholder Engagement 3.' Statement of Purpose SECTION FOUR: CASE STUDIES '.1 Overvie$ and E(amples '.2 Best Practices and Lessons Learned '.3 Key Decision Points SECTION FIVE: VISION AND IMPLEMENTATION +.1 Vision Statement +.2 Management Zones +.3 Immediate Interventions +.' Near01erm Strategies +.+ Long-1erm Direction SECTION SIX: FURTHER RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 Trees and Vegetation 2.2 Par!ing and Motor Vehicle Circulation 2.3 Adaptive Use and
    [Show full text]
  • Mark D. Johnson
    Mark D. Johnson Home Address: Work Address: 83 Romano Rd Maine College of Art South Portland, ME 04106 522 Congress St. 207-767-7132 Portland, ME 04101 Website: 207-879-5742 ext.5570 www.markjohnsonceramics.com [email protected] EDUCATION: Master of Fine Arts, Ceramics, 1983, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio. Bachelor of Fine Arts, Ceramics, 1980, summa cum laude, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio Associate of Arts, Ceramics and Sculpture, 1978, Lakeland Community College, Mentor, Ohio TEACHING Maine College of Art, Portland, Maine EXPERIENCE: Professor of Ceramics, 3D Design and Drawing 1987-Present Ceramics Program Chair 1985-87 Hartford Art School, Univ. of Hartford, West Hartford, CT Adjunct Ceramics Instructor/Ceramics Dept. Technician 1983-85 Archie Bray Foundation, Helena, MT Resident Artist in Ceramics, Ceramics Instructor 1984-85 Helena Art Center, Helena, MT Drawing Instructor 1981-83 Kent State University, Kent, OH Graduate Teaching Assistant in Ceramics 1980-81 Lakeland Community College, Mentor, OH Drawing Instructor RELATED Artist in Residence, Watershed Center for Ceramic Art, EXPERIENCE: Newcastle, ME 2011 VISITING ARTIST/ Haystack Mountain School of Crafts, Deer Isle, ME SLIDE LECTURES: Arrowmont School of Arts and Crafts, Gatlinburg, TN Maine Center for Contemporary Art, Rockport, ME Bates College, Lewiston, ME Nova Scotia College of Art and Design, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Portland Museum of Art, Portland, ME NCECA Conference, “Emerging Artist Lecture”, Syracuse, NY Greater Hartford Community College, Hartford, CT University of New England, Biddeford, ME Montana State University, Bozeman, MT Watershed Center for Ceramic Art, Newcastle, ME PUBLICATIONS: Pottery Making Illustrated Magazine, Flower Rafts: Compose and Contain, by Mark Johnson, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Monroe County, Michigan, War of 1812 Bicentennial Tentative Event Schedule
    MONROE COUNTY, MICHIGAN, WAR OF 1812 BICENTENNIAL TENTATIVE EVENT SCHEDULE 2012 DATE EVENT LOCATION ORGANIZER DESCRIPTION January Battle of New Orleans Jean Lafitte Nat’l Park Annual event 6-8 Chalmette, Louisiana January Annual River Raisin Battlefield NPS + Friends of Memorial ceremonies & 21 Commemoration Battle & area locations RiverRaisin Btlfld lectures – small, regional of the River Raisin January Dancing Through Time Monroe County MC War of 1812 Annual fundraiser for 1812 – 20 Annual Fundraiser Community College Steering Committee (grand finale raised $40k) Feb. 25 Living History Guelph Ontario Conference March 6 Don Hickey Lecture GVSU Grand Rapids, MI Mi Commission on Lecture series “Madison–War Pres.” Bic. War of 1812 March 7 Don Hickey Lecture Detroit Historical Mi Commission on Lecture series “What We Know Ain’t” Museum Bic. War of 1812 March 8 Don Hickey Lecture Mi Historical Center Mi Commission on Lecture series “Legacy of 1812” Lansing, MI Bic. War of 1812 March Algonquin Club muskrat Monroe, MI Friends of River Invitational fundraiser– Tony 20 & turkey dinner Raisin Battlefield Yanik spoke on Detroit 1812 March Annual Fort Osage Historic Fort Osage 24-25 Sibley, Missouri 2-4pm Militia Muster River Raisin National Lacroix’s company Introduction & training for Mar. 25 Battlefield Park prospective re-enactors 2-4pm Militia Muster River Raisin National Lacroix’s company Introduction & training for April 29 Battlefield Park prospective re-enactors May 5-6 Annual Battle London, Ontario Annual event Longwoods May 12 1812 camp Monroe County Scout-o-Rama Annual boyscout camp with Fairgrounds 1812 theme this year May 13 Annual Founders Day Sawyer Homestead Friends of Sawyer Booths, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashley Beatty 5840 Woodheath Avenue, Fort Wayne, in 46809 I 702.427.8442 I [email protected] I Solidashesphoto.Com
    Ashley Beatty 5840 Woodheath Avenue, Fort Wayne, IN 46809 I 702.427.8442 I [email protected] I solidashesphoto.com EDUCATION 2017 – 2019 Masters in Fine Arts, Photography (2D,3D,Printmaking), Cranbrook Academy of Art, Bloomfield, Michigan 2002 – 2016 Bachelor of Fine Arts Degree, General Fine Arts, School of The Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois SOLO EXHIBITIONS 2017 Artlink Gallery, Fort Wayne, Indiana Jennifer Ford Art Gallery, Fort Wayne, Indiana – Into the woods 2016 Wunderkammer Company, Fort Wayne, Indiana 2015 Old Crown, Fort Wayne, Indiana – Midwesting : a collection of photographs and prints Dash-In, Fort Wayne, Indiana – Roads Traveled 2014 Old Crown, Fort Wayne, Indiana – Interlude Dash-In, Fort Wayne, Indiana – Retrospective DUO EXHIBITIONS 2020 “Weather Permitting”, with Jeff Schofield, Plyspace Artist Residency, Muncie, IN (anticipated) 2019 “4 Degrees or More”, with Jeff Schofield, Chowan Arts Council, Edenton, NC SELECTED GROUP EXHIBITIONS 2019 Peanut Factory & Chowan Arts Council, Edenton, NC – Snag Trees, with Jeff Schofield Burnside Farm Gallery, Detroit, MI – Foresight / for Site Popp’s Packing Gallery, Detroit, MI – W(HERE) Mercedes-Benz Financial Services, Farmington Hills, MI – Experiencing Perspectives Cranbrook Art Museum, Bloomfield Hills, MI – Graduate Degree Exhibition San Fernando Gallery, Los Angeles, CA – Mom’s Spaghetti - MFA Cranbrook Photography Show Forum Gallery, Bloomfield Hills, MI – Collective Terrain ‘Cranbrook’ Show 2018 Next Step Studios & Gallery, Ferndale, MI – Hand Picked Collective
    [Show full text]
  • INDIANA MAGAZINE of HISTORY Volume XXXIX September, 1943 No
    INDIANA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY Volume XXXIX September, 1943 No. 3 John Hays and the Fort Wayne Indian Agency BY NELLIEA. ROBERTSON John Hays should have known better than to take an appointment as Indian agent at Fort Wayne in 1820. It was a hard, dangerous, exasperating, body-racking job ; and he was too experienced in frontier life to underestimate its demands. Perhaps he was tired of the little Illinois town on the Mississippi where he had lived for twenty-seven years. Cahokia had seemed a promising spot when he settled there in 1793 as agent for the trading house of Todd and Hay. One of the oldest settlements of the Illinois country, and a county-seat town, it then rivaled ancient Kaskaskia in im- portance.' For several years before, Hays had traded with the Indians of Canada and the Northwest; he had a good English education and a fluent command of French. Since more of Cahokia's five hundred inhabitants were French than English, it was a great advantage to be bilingual. The fact probably helped Hays to secure his appointment as sheriff of St. Clair County in 1802, and as postmaster of Cahokia, both of which offices he held year in and year out without regard to the direction of political tides." 1 Hays was born in the city of New York in 1770, according to a sketch of hie life in John Reynolds, The Pioneer History of Illinois . (Belleville, Ill., 1852), .186-88; see also Francis S. Philbrick (ed.), The Laws of Indiana Terratory, 1801-1809 (Indiana Historical Bureau Re- print of Illinois Historical Collections, XXI, Indianapolis, 1931), cclxxi- cclxxii.
    [Show full text]